SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 12
Descargar para leer sin conexión
Office of Academic Affairs
January 29, 2013




Presenter:
Barbara Altmann,
         Vice Provost for Academic Affairs
Materials presented are for general informational
purposes only and do not constitute official University
rules, policies or practices, or interpretations or
summaries of such rules, policies or practices. No
warranties or representations are made as to the
accuracy of any information presented. Any
discrepancy between the information presented here
and the official rules and policies of the University of
Oregon and the Oregon University System is not
intended to and does not alter or amend the official
rules and policies.
   Reality check for progress toward tenure

   “Practice run” for faculty member as she or
    he approaches tenure review process

   Important for department to give meaningful
    review and feedback
   Review work accomplished/current trajectory

   Is candidate on track for tenure?

   Formative and Summative Evaluations
   Three-year contract renewal

   Terminal one-year contract

   One-year contract with possible
    renewal, with stipulations
   Current vita

   Brief statement of
    accomplishments, progress, and prospective
    progress in research and teaching

   Copies of work published/completed and
    works in progress
   Department head assembles materials for
    review
   Voting faculty deliberate and vote
   Vote results are forwarded to department
    head
   Department head provides recommendation
    to the dean
   Dean provides clear explanation of the
    decision, and forwards copy of the review
    dossier and contract renewal documents to
    Academic Affairs for each possible outcome:
     3-year renewal
     Terminal 1-year contract
     1-year contract with possible renewal and
     stipulations
   Academic Affairs provides a response after
    review of the following:
     Dean’s narrative
     Recommendations of department head
     Candidate’s review file
     Contract renewal documents
   Unequivocally positive: on track for tenure
     3-year contract renewal

   Unequivocally negative: tenure not possible, no
    desire to retain
     1-year terminal contract and dismissal

   Problematic but still possible: could make tenure
    with a change in direction, desire to retain in
    department
     1-year contract with stipulations
   Focus on accomplishments

   Conduct the discussion in two parts
     Diagnostic review of vita and accomplishments
     Evaluative review of prospective success and what
     is needed

   Focus on the vita and accomplishments, not
    on the person
Third-Year Reviews 2013

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente

Qualities of a good testing instrument
Qualities of a good testing instrumentQualities of a good testing instrument
Qualities of a good testing instrumentMarilou Vergara
 
Measurement,test and evaluation
Measurement,test and evaluationMeasurement,test and evaluation
Measurement,test and evaluationShinta
 
Administration of test
Administration of testAdministration of test
Administration of testLNIPE
 
Measurement,evaluation,assessment(upload)
Measurement,evaluation,assessment(upload)Measurement,evaluation,assessment(upload)
Measurement,evaluation,assessment(upload)Dr.Shazia Zamir
 
Erni types of evaluation
Erni  types of evaluationErni  types of evaluation
Erni types of evaluationYouise Saculo
 
T - Test, Measurement and Evaluation
T - Test, Measurement and EvaluationT - Test, Measurement and Evaluation
T - Test, Measurement and EvaluationMahendra Rajak
 
Different kinds of evaluation
Different kinds of evaluationDifferent kinds of evaluation
Different kinds of evaluationMaria Mu
 

La actualidad más candente (11)

Qualities of a good testing instrument
Qualities of a good testing instrumentQualities of a good testing instrument
Qualities of a good testing instrument
 
Types of evaluation
Types of evaluationTypes of evaluation
Types of evaluation
 
Characteristics of a good measuring tool
Characteristics of a good measuring toolCharacteristics of a good measuring tool
Characteristics of a good measuring tool
 
Measurement,test and evaluation
Measurement,test and evaluationMeasurement,test and evaluation
Measurement,test and evaluation
 
Administration of test
Administration of testAdministration of test
Administration of test
 
Functions of evaluation
Functions of evaluationFunctions of evaluation
Functions of evaluation
 
Summative and formative evaluation
Summative and formative evaluationSummative and formative evaluation
Summative and formative evaluation
 
Measurement,evaluation,assessment(upload)
Measurement,evaluation,assessment(upload)Measurement,evaluation,assessment(upload)
Measurement,evaluation,assessment(upload)
 
Erni types of evaluation
Erni  types of evaluationErni  types of evaluation
Erni types of evaluation
 
T - Test, Measurement and Evaluation
T - Test, Measurement and EvaluationT - Test, Measurement and Evaluation
T - Test, Measurement and Evaluation
 
Different kinds of evaluation
Different kinds of evaluationDifferent kinds of evaluation
Different kinds of evaluation
 

Similar a Third-Year Reviews 2013

NTTF Review and Promotion 2013
NTTF Review and Promotion 2013NTTF Review and Promotion 2013
NTTF Review and Promotion 2013UO-AcademicAffairs
 
Career NTTF Evaluation and Promotion Processes
Career NTTF Evaluation and Promotion Processes Career NTTF Evaluation and Promotion Processes
Career NTTF Evaluation and Promotion Processes UO-AcademicAffairs
 
CBA Implementation: One-time reclassification of adjunct faculty
CBA Implementation: One-time reclassification of adjunct facultyCBA Implementation: One-time reclassification of adjunct faculty
CBA Implementation: One-time reclassification of adjunct facultyUO-AcademicAffairs
 
Probation and Confirmation Policy
Probation and Confirmation PolicyProbation and Confirmation Policy
Probation and Confirmation PolicyHrhelp board
 
Performance Appraisals
Performance AppraisalsPerformance Appraisals
Performance Appraisalssatyam mishra
 
Promotion to Full Professor April 21, 2015
Promotion to Full Professor April 21, 2015Promotion to Full Professor April 21, 2015
Promotion to Full Professor April 21, 2015UO-AcademicAffairs
 
Department heads office managers staff revised jan 2014 final
Department heads office managers staff revised jan 2014 finalDepartment heads office managers staff revised jan 2014 final
Department heads office managers staff revised jan 2014 finalUO-AcademicAffairs
 
Professional Unbranded Performance Appraisal Form
Professional Unbranded Performance Appraisal FormProfessional Unbranded Performance Appraisal Form
Professional Unbranded Performance Appraisal FormOleksiy Kuryliak
 
Performance Appraisalsfor Prof Staff.Ppt
Performance Appraisalsfor Prof Staff.PptPerformance Appraisalsfor Prof Staff.Ppt
Performance Appraisalsfor Prof Staff.Pptsatyam mishra
 
Tenure Reduction Program, March 18, 2014
Tenure Reduction Program, March 18, 2014Tenure Reduction Program, March 18, 2014
Tenure Reduction Program, March 18, 2014UO-AcademicAffairs
 
Probation and confirmation policy for employee -Hrhelpboard
Probation and confirmation policy for employee -HrhelpboardProbation and confirmation policy for employee -Hrhelpboard
Probation and confirmation policy for employee -HrhelpboardHrhelpboard
 
Teacher performance appraisal presentation
Teacher performance appraisal presentationTeacher performance appraisal presentation
Teacher performance appraisal presentationShericka Wilson
 
S2009 022 new rules and proceedures for further assessment opportunities
S2009 022 new rules and proceedures for further assessment opportunitiesS2009 022 new rules and proceedures for further assessment opportunities
S2009 022 new rules and proceedures for further assessment opportunitiesjohnwest
 
Grading RubricMN 507 - Assignment #3 Comparing Systems of Hea.docx
Grading RubricMN 507 - Assignment #3 Comparing Systems of Hea.docxGrading RubricMN 507 - Assignment #3 Comparing Systems of Hea.docx
Grading RubricMN 507 - Assignment #3 Comparing Systems of Hea.docxbenjaminjames21681
 
HEA 550 Final Project Milestone Three Evaluation of Effec.docx
HEA 550 Final Project Milestone Three Evaluation of Effec.docxHEA 550 Final Project Milestone Three Evaluation of Effec.docx
HEA 550 Final Project Milestone Three Evaluation of Effec.docxpooleavelina
 
TOEFL IBT vz CEFR - Panca Eka Septiardi.pptx
TOEFL IBT vz CEFR - Panca Eka Septiardi.pptxTOEFL IBT vz CEFR - Panca Eka Septiardi.pptx
TOEFL IBT vz CEFR - Panca Eka Septiardi.pptxjiu_51
 
Examining the exam
Examining the examExamining the exam
Examining the examDonnaOti
 

Similar a Third-Year Reviews 2013 (20)

NTTF Review and Promotion 2013
NTTF Review and Promotion 2013NTTF Review and Promotion 2013
NTTF Review and Promotion 2013
 
Career NTTF Evaluation and Promotion Processes
Career NTTF Evaluation and Promotion Processes Career NTTF Evaluation and Promotion Processes
Career NTTF Evaluation and Promotion Processes
 
CBA Implementation: One-time reclassification of adjunct faculty
CBA Implementation: One-time reclassification of adjunct facultyCBA Implementation: One-time reclassification of adjunct faculty
CBA Implementation: One-time reclassification of adjunct faculty
 
Post-Tenure Review 2009-2010
Post-Tenure Review 2009-2010Post-Tenure Review 2009-2010
Post-Tenure Review 2009-2010
 
Demystifying Promotion and Tenure
Demystifying Promotion and TenureDemystifying Promotion and Tenure
Demystifying Promotion and Tenure
 
Probation and Confirmation Policy
Probation and Confirmation PolicyProbation and Confirmation Policy
Probation and Confirmation Policy
 
Performance Appraisals
Performance AppraisalsPerformance Appraisals
Performance Appraisals
 
Promotion to Full Professor April 21, 2015
Promotion to Full Professor April 21, 2015Promotion to Full Professor April 21, 2015
Promotion to Full Professor April 21, 2015
 
Department heads office managers staff revised jan 2014 final
Department heads office managers staff revised jan 2014 finalDepartment heads office managers staff revised jan 2014 final
Department heads office managers staff revised jan 2014 final
 
Professional Unbranded Performance Appraisal Form
Professional Unbranded Performance Appraisal FormProfessional Unbranded Performance Appraisal Form
Professional Unbranded Performance Appraisal Form
 
Performance Appraisalsfor Prof Staff.Ppt
Performance Appraisalsfor Prof Staff.PptPerformance Appraisalsfor Prof Staff.Ppt
Performance Appraisalsfor Prof Staff.Ppt
 
Tenure Reduction Program, March 18, 2014
Tenure Reduction Program, March 18, 2014Tenure Reduction Program, March 18, 2014
Tenure Reduction Program, March 18, 2014
 
Probation and confirmation policy for employee -Hrhelpboard
Probation and confirmation policy for employee -HrhelpboardProbation and confirmation policy for employee -Hrhelpboard
Probation and confirmation policy for employee -Hrhelpboard
 
Teacher performance appraisal presentation
Teacher performance appraisal presentationTeacher performance appraisal presentation
Teacher performance appraisal presentation
 
S2009 022 new rules and proceedures for further assessment opportunities
S2009 022 new rules and proceedures for further assessment opportunitiesS2009 022 new rules and proceedures for further assessment opportunities
S2009 022 new rules and proceedures for further assessment opportunities
 
Grading RubricMN 507 - Assignment #3 Comparing Systems of Hea.docx
Grading RubricMN 507 - Assignment #3 Comparing Systems of Hea.docxGrading RubricMN 507 - Assignment #3 Comparing Systems of Hea.docx
Grading RubricMN 507 - Assignment #3 Comparing Systems of Hea.docx
 
Demystifying P&T 2009
Demystifying P&T 2009Demystifying P&T 2009
Demystifying P&T 2009
 
HEA 550 Final Project Milestone Three Evaluation of Effec.docx
HEA 550 Final Project Milestone Three Evaluation of Effec.docxHEA 550 Final Project Milestone Three Evaluation of Effec.docx
HEA 550 Final Project Milestone Three Evaluation of Effec.docx
 
TOEFL IBT vz CEFR - Panca Eka Septiardi.pptx
TOEFL IBT vz CEFR - Panca Eka Septiardi.pptxTOEFL IBT vz CEFR - Panca Eka Septiardi.pptx
TOEFL IBT vz CEFR - Panca Eka Septiardi.pptx
 
Examining the exam
Examining the examExamining the exam
Examining the exam
 

Más de UO-AcademicAffairs

Tenure Reduction Program April 7, 2015
 Tenure Reduction Program April 7, 2015 Tenure Reduction Program April 7, 2015
Tenure Reduction Program April 7, 2015UO-AcademicAffairs
 
Retirement Considerations (TRP) April 7, 2015
Retirement Considerations (TRP) April 7, 2015Retirement Considerations (TRP) April 7, 2015
Retirement Considerations (TRP) April 7, 2015UO-AcademicAffairs
 
Preparing Promotion and Tenure Files 02/24/15
Preparing Promotion and Tenure Files 02/24/15Preparing Promotion and Tenure Files 02/24/15
Preparing Promotion and Tenure Files 02/24/15UO-AcademicAffairs
 
P&T for Tenure Track Faculty Who Will Undergo Review 11/11/14
P&T for Tenure Track Faculty Who Will Undergo Review 11/11/14P&T for Tenure Track Faculty Who Will Undergo Review 11/11/14
P&T for Tenure Track Faculty Who Will Undergo Review 11/11/14UO-AcademicAffairs
 
10/21/14 Workshop: Promotion and Tenure for Untenured Faculty
10/21/14 Workshop: Promotion and Tenure for Untenured Faculty10/21/14 Workshop: Promotion and Tenure for Untenured Faculty
10/21/14 Workshop: Promotion and Tenure for Untenured FacultyUO-AcademicAffairs
 
Retirement Considerations, March 18, 2014
Retirement Considerations, March 18, 2014Retirement Considerations, March 18, 2014
Retirement Considerations, March 18, 2014UO-AcademicAffairs
 
Promotion and Tenure for Faculty Who Will Undergo Review
Promotion and Tenure for Faculty Who Will Undergo ReviewPromotion and Tenure for Faculty Who Will Undergo Review
Promotion and Tenure for Faculty Who Will Undergo ReviewUO-AcademicAffairs
 
Introduction to Tenure for Untenured Faculty 2013
Introduction to Tenure for Untenured Faculty 2013Introduction to Tenure for Untenured Faculty 2013
Introduction to Tenure for Untenured Faculty 2013UO-AcademicAffairs
 
Promotion to Full Professor Workshop
Promotion to Full Professor WorkshopPromotion to Full Professor Workshop
Promotion to Full Professor WorkshopUO-AcademicAffairs
 
Immigration Reform: Oregon Latino Students, Families and Access to UO
Immigration Reform: Oregon Latino Students, Families and Access to UOImmigration Reform: Oregon Latino Students, Families and Access to UO
Immigration Reform: Oregon Latino Students, Families and Access to UOUO-AcademicAffairs
 
Preparing tenure files_for_dept_heads_ofcmanagers_staff_jan 15_2013
Preparing tenure files_for_dept_heads_ofcmanagers_staff_jan 15_2013Preparing tenure files_for_dept_heads_ofcmanagers_staff_jan 15_2013
Preparing tenure files_for_dept_heads_ofcmanagers_staff_jan 15_2013UO-AcademicAffairs
 
Writing a tenure statement 2011
Writing a tenure statement 2011Writing a tenure statement 2011
Writing a tenure statement 2011UO-AcademicAffairs
 

Más de UO-AcademicAffairs (12)

Tenure Reduction Program April 7, 2015
 Tenure Reduction Program April 7, 2015 Tenure Reduction Program April 7, 2015
Tenure Reduction Program April 7, 2015
 
Retirement Considerations (TRP) April 7, 2015
Retirement Considerations (TRP) April 7, 2015Retirement Considerations (TRP) April 7, 2015
Retirement Considerations (TRP) April 7, 2015
 
Preparing Promotion and Tenure Files 02/24/15
Preparing Promotion and Tenure Files 02/24/15Preparing Promotion and Tenure Files 02/24/15
Preparing Promotion and Tenure Files 02/24/15
 
P&T for Tenure Track Faculty Who Will Undergo Review 11/11/14
P&T for Tenure Track Faculty Who Will Undergo Review 11/11/14P&T for Tenure Track Faculty Who Will Undergo Review 11/11/14
P&T for Tenure Track Faculty Who Will Undergo Review 11/11/14
 
10/21/14 Workshop: Promotion and Tenure for Untenured Faculty
10/21/14 Workshop: Promotion and Tenure for Untenured Faculty10/21/14 Workshop: Promotion and Tenure for Untenured Faculty
10/21/14 Workshop: Promotion and Tenure for Untenured Faculty
 
Retirement Considerations, March 18, 2014
Retirement Considerations, March 18, 2014Retirement Considerations, March 18, 2014
Retirement Considerations, March 18, 2014
 
Promotion and Tenure for Faculty Who Will Undergo Review
Promotion and Tenure for Faculty Who Will Undergo ReviewPromotion and Tenure for Faculty Who Will Undergo Review
Promotion and Tenure for Faculty Who Will Undergo Review
 
Introduction to Tenure for Untenured Faculty 2013
Introduction to Tenure for Untenured Faculty 2013Introduction to Tenure for Untenured Faculty 2013
Introduction to Tenure for Untenured Faculty 2013
 
Promotion to Full Professor Workshop
Promotion to Full Professor WorkshopPromotion to Full Professor Workshop
Promotion to Full Professor Workshop
 
Immigration Reform: Oregon Latino Students, Families and Access to UO
Immigration Reform: Oregon Latino Students, Families and Access to UOImmigration Reform: Oregon Latino Students, Families and Access to UO
Immigration Reform: Oregon Latino Students, Families and Access to UO
 
Preparing tenure files_for_dept_heads_ofcmanagers_staff_jan 15_2013
Preparing tenure files_for_dept_heads_ofcmanagers_staff_jan 15_2013Preparing tenure files_for_dept_heads_ofcmanagers_staff_jan 15_2013
Preparing tenure files_for_dept_heads_ofcmanagers_staff_jan 15_2013
 
Writing a tenure statement 2011
Writing a tenure statement 2011Writing a tenure statement 2011
Writing a tenure statement 2011
 

Third-Year Reviews 2013

  • 1. Office of Academic Affairs January 29, 2013 Presenter: Barbara Altmann, Vice Provost for Academic Affairs
  • 2. Materials presented are for general informational purposes only and do not constitute official University rules, policies or practices, or interpretations or summaries of such rules, policies or practices. No warranties or representations are made as to the accuracy of any information presented. Any discrepancy between the information presented here and the official rules and policies of the University of Oregon and the Oregon University System is not intended to and does not alter or amend the official rules and policies.
  • 3. Reality check for progress toward tenure  “Practice run” for faculty member as she or he approaches tenure review process  Important for department to give meaningful review and feedback
  • 4. Review work accomplished/current trajectory  Is candidate on track for tenure?  Formative and Summative Evaluations
  • 5. Three-year contract renewal  Terminal one-year contract  One-year contract with possible renewal, with stipulations
  • 6. Current vita  Brief statement of accomplishments, progress, and prospective progress in research and teaching  Copies of work published/completed and works in progress
  • 7. Department head assembles materials for review  Voting faculty deliberate and vote  Vote results are forwarded to department head  Department head provides recommendation to the dean
  • 8. Dean provides clear explanation of the decision, and forwards copy of the review dossier and contract renewal documents to Academic Affairs for each possible outcome:  3-year renewal  Terminal 1-year contract  1-year contract with possible renewal and stipulations
  • 9. Academic Affairs provides a response after review of the following:  Dean’s narrative  Recommendations of department head  Candidate’s review file  Contract renewal documents
  • 10. Unequivocally positive: on track for tenure  3-year contract renewal  Unequivocally negative: tenure not possible, no desire to retain  1-year terminal contract and dismissal  Problematic but still possible: could make tenure with a change in direction, desire to retain in department  1-year contract with stipulations
  • 11. Focus on accomplishments  Conduct the discussion in two parts  Diagnostic review of vita and accomplishments  Evaluative review of prospective success and what is needed  Focus on the vita and accomplishments, not on the person