Similar a Win-wins in forest product value chains? How governance impacts the sustainability of livelihoods based on non-timber forest products from Cameroon
Similar a Win-wins in forest product value chains? How governance impacts the sustainability of livelihoods based on non-timber forest products from Cameroon (20)
Species composition, diversity and community structure of mangroves in Barang...
Win-wins in forest product value chains? How governance impacts the sustainability of livelihoods based on non-timber forest products from Cameroon
1. Win-wins in forest product value chains?
How governance impacts the sustainability of
livelihoods based on non-timber forest products
from Cameroon
Verina Ingram
PhD defence
18 March 2014, Agnietenkapel, University of Amsterdam,
The Netherlands
6. Sustainable
• Development that meets the
needs of the present without
compromising the ability of
future generations to meet their
own needs.
• Cope with risks and shocks, and
improve way of living while not
undermining the natural
environment
7. Governance....
Way a society organises its
self
• Rules of the game
(formal & informal)
• Boundaries
• Umpires
• Supporters
• Winners and losers
8. Problems
Population 19 million & growing
People depend on NTFPs for
subsistence and cash
Increasing deforestation and
degradation
Unsustainable trade
Contradicting governance
regimes
High corruption
9. The question:
How does
governance
impact the
sustainability of
livelihoods
based on NTFPs
?
1. How do these chains work, can
people earn a living, both today and
tomorrow?
2 How is the trade governed?
3. Does this make the trade
sustainable?
4. How can it be done better ?
10. • Talking 2,195 interviews!
• Hassling officials trade data
• Walking observation
• Counting plants resource assessment
• Participatory action research
• Data analysis
Methods : Getting the answers
14. Ineffective laws & customs
Strong union governance
High corruption
High value & demand
Not sustainable
15. Q1. How do these chains work
and can people earn a living,
both today and tomorrow?
• 710 NTFP species, 225 traded
• 34,000 people involved
• 8 NTFP markets worth over US$ 32 million
annually
• Average yearly incomes US$ 3,189 annually,
US$ 1.4 per day per person
• NTFPs not a way out of poverty for most
• Most dependence on NTFP incomes, with
fewer income sources are at end of chain
17. Q3. Are the NTFP chains sustainable?
Pygeum
Gum arabic*
Bamboo
Honey
Yes - Win No - Lose
Cola
Raffia
Bush mango Eru
18. Q4. Recommendations
and some results
• Change the law
• No one arrangement works best
• Plural arrangements work, if recognised and complementary
• And if govern forest species and markets
• Get people in chains talking
• Cultivation
• Know what NTFPs are worth
• Support the most vulnerable people
• Tackle corruption
Chains vary regarding actors (state-non state), institutions (formal-statutory/informal-customary), the rule of market (weak-strong) and regulation of tenure (weak-strong). Prunus strongly formalized, state-governed chain with market access strongly regulated and tenure more weakly regulated chain + NGO-governed chain with moderate market governance and strong customary governance based mainly on informal institutions
NEED TO ADD SCALE USED AND DEFINTNIONS INTO THE METHODOLOGY!!