The document summarizes a presentation on leveraging a critical friend model. It discusses: 1) Baseline data that showed group 1 (who received feedback) rated higher than group 2 (who received no feedback) in areas like communication, adaptability, and service orientation. 2) Subsequent rounds of data collection found greater improvements in group 1 over group 2, indicating the feedback was effective. 3) Next steps discussed expanding the program and collecting additional data.

1. Session
9:30-10:45
Nancy Lindfors, Harrison College (In)
Andrew Shean, Ashford University (Ca)
Moderator: Kathi Baldwin, University of Alaska, SE Sitka

2. Leveraging a Critical Friend Model

3. History:
•
•
•
•
•
•

4. Where are we?
Evaluation and
Rollout Implementation
Revisions

5. Baseline Data
Professional/
Communicati Service Overall
Leadership Adaptability Technical
on Orientation Rating
Expertise
2.73 2.66 2.58 2.91 2.82 2.74
Overall Rating 7.12
Service Orientation
Professional / Technical Expertise
Communication
Adaptbiltiy
Leadership
2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 3

6. Next Steps
•
•
•
•
•

13. 3.5
3.1
3 2.9
2.5 2.4
2 1.9
1.5
1
0.5
0
Group 1 (Feedback) Group 2 (No Feedback)
Round 1 Round 2

14. 0.45
0.4
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
Change Comparison
Group 1 (Feedback) Group 2 (No Feedback)

18. 3.5 3.2
3 2.7
2.5
2.5
2.1
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
Group 1 (Feedback) Group 2 (No Feedback)
Round 1 Round 2

19. 0.45
0.4 0.4
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
Change Comparison
Group 1 (Feedback) Group 2 (No Feedback)

22. 3.5 3.2
3 2.7
2.5 2.4
2 1.9
1.5
1
0.5
0
Group 1 (Feedback) Group 2 (No Feedback)
Round 1 Round 2

23. 0.6
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
Change Comparison
Group 1 (Feedback) Group 2 (No Feedback)

24. 4
3.5 3.4
3.1
3
2.5
2.5 2.3
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
Group 1 (Feedback) Group 2 (No Feedback)
Round 1 Round 2

25. 0.35
0.3
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
Change Comparison
Group 1 (Feedback) Group 2 (No Feedback)

29. 3.5 3.3
3.1
3
2.6
2.5 2.2
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
Group 1 (Feedback) Group 2 (No Feedback)
Round 1 Round 2

30. 0.45
0.4
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.1
0.05
0
Change Comparison
Group 1 (Feedback) Group 2 (No Feedback)

31. 3.5 3.2
3 2.9
2.5
2.5
2.1
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
Group 1 (Feedback) Group 2 (No Feedback)
Round 1 Round 2

32. 0.45
0.4
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
Change Comparison
Group 1 (Feedback) Group 2 (No Feedback)

33. 3.5
3.1
3
2.5 2.3
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
Mean Score
Group 1 (Feedback) Group 2 (No Feedback)

34. All Instructors In All Areas
3 2.7
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
Mean Score
All Instructors In All Areas

38. Targeted Professional Development

39. QUESTIONS/COMMENTS