Evaluation question 3

1. 3) What have you
learned from your
audience
feedback?
Part 2

2. Audience Feedback
Once our main and ancillary task’s were completed
we needed to gain feedback from our audience to
ensure we had produced suitable content which our
target audience could relate to, understand and
enjoy.
We chose to give our audience a questionnaire to fill
out when watching, listening and reading our final
products.
We made sure to include both open and closed
questions throughout the three questionnaires in order
to gain quantitative and qualitative data and to
make sure we had detailed and informative
feedback from each individual.

4. What did you like?
Music
What did
you like?
Comedy
0
5
10
We then asked ‘what
did you dislike?’ and it
What
became apparent that
the sound levels needed
to be adjusted. This
Sound Levels
raised concern for us
because when we were
editing we made sure
the sound levels were Camera Work
even and the audio was
perfectly clear
0
throughout.
When we asked the
question ‘what did you
like?’ the overall majority
of the answers given
were music and
comedy. This indicating
that our audience
understood what we
were trying to achieve
and understood the
comedic undertones of
the documentary.
did you dislike?
What did you
dislike?
5
10

5. The humour within our
documentary seemed
to be the one thing
that stood out
amongst the
rest, along with the
facts provided
throughout.
What stood out the most?
Facts
What stood
out the most?
Humour
0
5
10
15
Did you learn anything?
No
Yes
0
10
20
All of our audience stated that
they had learned something
whist watching our
documentary , this alongside
Did you
the answer to the previous
learn
question indicates that we had
anything? done a sufficient job in
catering for our audience and
supplied them with knowledge
and entertainment.

6. What would you change?
What would
you change?
Music
Camera Work
Sound Levels
0
5
10
Overall it became apparent that the main
concern was the sound levels and it was
those that needed to be changed the
most, there was a little dislike for the
camera work where people said a tripod
was needed to be used more, however
parts of the documentary were intentionally
shaky due to the use of hand held.
Would you continue watching our
documentary?
Would you
continue watching
our documentar?
No
All of our audience stated that
they would continue watching
our documentary.
Yes
0
2
4
6

7. Overall Feedback
The audience enjoyed the
opening five minutes to our
documentary and would happily
carry on to watch the rest of it.
Positives
Looking back at our
documentary questionnaire
there seems to be a set of
reoccurring answers when
asked ‘What did you like?’
It became apparent that our
strongest elements within the
documentary were the
comedic aspects, the use of
animation and the voice over
script.
Negatives
Just as it was clear to spot the positives it
was clear to spot the reoccurring
negatives. These where the sound levels
and in some cases, the music used.
Improvements that could
have been made
- The sound levels during the interviews – the
music was overpowering at times
- The camera work could have been improved
by using the tripod more, however it proved
difficult when given a faulty tripod.
Was the audience’s
reaction expected?
Our audience reaction was better than
expected. They reacted well to the humour in
the documentary and their criticism was fair
and understandable.

9. Was it good quality?
Yes
No
When asked if our radio
trail was of good
quality the majority of
our audience said
yes, with a few saying
no due to the sound
levels.
What do you like?
Our audience
liked a range of
things within our
radio trail, the
main things being
the music, voice
over and the
audio clips from
the documentary.
Music
Voiceover
Audio Clips

10. More than half of our
audience stated that it was
clear what our radio trail
was advertising, stating that
the content/ information
was clear.
Is it clear what it is advertising?
Yes
No
Is it relevat to the documentary?
Yes
No
This lead on nicely to
our next
question, asking if it
linked in well with our
documentary.
Although a small
handful said no, the
overall majority agreed
that it did.

11. What would you change?
Sound levels
Music
When asked what they would change, the
audience replied that the sound levels and the
music were the most important things to be
changed. The reoccurring problem with the
sound leves worried us because just as we did
with our documentary, during editing we made
sure that the sound levels in our radio trail were
equal and complemented each other
nicely, however that did not show when
listening to it back through speakers

12. Overall Feedback
The audience enjoyed the
radio trail and understood
what was being said and
advertised.
Positives
The feedback suggests that
the radio trail links in with
the documentary, the
scripting/ voice over was
clear and the audio clips
were appropriate.
Negatives
It was clear that the main
negatives with the radio trail was
the sound levels and music.
Improvements that could
have been made
- The sound levels need to be consistent
- The music could have been placed a
little more appropriately throughout the
radio trail
- Was the audience’s
reaction expected?
Our audience reaction was better than
expected. They liked the clips we chose
to use from the documentary and found
the information to be clear and
informative.

14. Does it look good?
10
There was mixed views
when asked if our double
pages spread looked
good, however the majority
said that it was creative
and colourful.
8
6
4
2
0
Yes
When asked about the
conventions, most of
our audience agreed
that it did follow
them, with a few
people disagreeing.
no
Does it follow the
conventions?
15
10
5
0
Yes
No

15. Is it informative?
15
10
Over half of our
audience claimed
that our double page
spread had sufficient
information.
5
0
Yes
We also asked if it
was clear what it
was it was
advertising, just
over half agreed
that it was
clear, linking in
nicely with our last
question.
No
Is it clear what its
advertising?
15
10
5
0
Yes
No

16. Does it provide all relevant
information?
15
10
5
0
Yes
No
For our last question we asked ‘As this is advertising a TV
programme, does it provide all the relevant information
require?’ We were pleased to find that only one person said
no. This suggesting that we had included all of the sufficient
information needed in a TV listing double page spread.

17. Overall Feedback
The audience seemed to like
how creative our double
page spread was, but
agreed that it didn’t
necessarily look like the
conventional TV listing
double page spread. Thy
did, however agree that
despite this, it contained all
the relevant information
needed.
Positives
The feedback suggests that
there are a few positives
within our spread. It was
colourful and eye
catching, there was good
use of graphics and imaged
alongside the required
conventions of a professional
double page spread.
Negatives
The Negative qualities within our
double page spread is the lack of
potential content as the article
could have been a little longer
than it was. The overall feel of the
spread could have been improved
also.
Improvements that could
have been made
-
We could have used more images
We could have had a longer article
The layout could have been improved
Was the audience’s
reaction expected?
Our audience reaction was
expected, there were a range of different
views and opinions of our double page
spread/ The audience gave sufficient
criticism that we could agree with.