The document provides an outline for a presentation on building condition surveys. Some key points:
1) The presentation will cover survey and defect identification, examples of common building defects, inspection procedures, reporting methods, and analysis of inspection results including overall building ratings and predictive models.
2) Building defects are defined as areas of non-compliance to regulations or standards, or conditions outside of acceptable norms. Common defects discussed include cracks, foundation issues, and water damage.
3) Inspection procedures involve both visual and technical examinations. Reporting standards vary but typically involve documentation of defects, condition assessments, and recommendations for improvements.
4) Analysis of results includes categorizing defects, calculating overall building ratings, examining defect distributions
1. BUILDING CONDITION
SURVEY :
What's More from Defects
Identification
Adi Irfan Che-Ani
Norngainy Mohd. Tawil
Azalillah Ramdani Musa
Mazlan Mohd. Tahir
UKM
UKM Pakarunding Sdn. Bhd. UKM:Che-Ani 2012
http://www.eagle-wi.gov
2. 1. Survey & defect
2. Building defect: example
3. Building condition
survey: inspection
4. Building condition
survey: reporting
5. Next: analysis
6. Next: performance
PRESENTATION measurement
OUTLINE 7. Next: how “defect”
benefit us
8. Summary
3. Survey & Defect
Survey (Hollis & Gibson – Surveying
Buildings, 2005):
Inspection & investigation of construction &
services of property in sufficient details to enable
surveyor to advise what impact the condition &
circumstances of that property will have upon client.
Defects:
areas of non-compliance to the bye-law, regulation, http://myprservices.com
standard (mostly not subjective)
Out of acceptable condition (subjective)
http://www.buildingdefects.com.au/
“Defects will occur in buildings. It is one of the great certainties in
construction, the equivalent of death and taxes in life more generally”.
(Professor Anthony Lavers)
http://www.blaketurner.com
Page 3 UKM:Che-Ani 2012
5. Growth of mould and algae due
to water ponding and continuous
dampness Water ponding due to blockage
of outlet to rainwater downpipe
(due to small outlet) – it’s very
hot during the course of
Page 5
inspection
6. Water mark on the ceiling
surface due to water penetration
Stalactite effect due to
from leaking roof (the brown
water proofing failure at
color suggest it dripped via
upstairs toilet
timber trusses, perhaps the
trusses need structural
inspection)
Page 6
7. BUILDING DEFECT: CRACKS
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvTlB1EVKbQ&feature=player_embedded
Page 7 UKM:Che-Ani 2012
9. BUILDING DEFECT
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OeAB9XLjA8k&feature=player_embedded
Page 9 UKM:Che-Ani 2012
10. BUILDING CONDITION SURVEY : INSPECTION
An apparent defect has been
perceived when
It looks Someone It just felt Something
wrong Something heard wrong felt
smells strange something
Page 10 UKM:Che-Ani 2012
http://www.nienergyrating.com
11. Inspect All seem No further
OK? action at this
time
Defect Record and
confirmed keep in mind
for future
Is a matter of Allocate priority in
health and safety accord with agreed
criteria
UKM:Che-Ani 2012
Page 11
12. Initiate urgent Prepare or select Select
action appropriate appropriate
specialists for
rectification further
specification inspection
Discuss and agree with client and users
Commission rectification work
Check and record work in progress early
on and periodically
Page 12
Review periodically
UKM:Che-Ani 2012 (annually)
13. BUILDING CONDITION SURVEY : REPORTING
Various standard available
No Piawaian/ Tahun Kerja Pra- Kerja Keperluan Keperluan Kaedah Penggunaan Input data Cadangan Kandungan
Dokumen dibang- Pemeriksaan ukur nilai anggaran pengkadaran/ kod warna pembaikan utama
unkan kondisi pasaran kos numerik pelaporan
1 RICS Building 2005 Kajian Meja Protokol Tidak Tidak Tiada Tiada Keadaan, Ada Pemeriksaan,
Survey Report 1 (visual) perlu perlu sebab, Laporan,
tahap Penilaian
kerosakan
2 BRE Design 2007 Tiada Protokol Perlu Perlu Ada Tiada Keadaan Ada Pemeriksaan,
Quality Manual 1 (visual) Laporan,
Penilaian
http://www.home-building-inspectors-ny.com/
3 ASTM E-2018 2008 Penelitian Protokol Perlu Tiada Tiada Keadaan Ada Laporan
dokumen & 1 (visual) Keadaan
temubual Hartanah
4 The RICS Home 2009 Tidak perlu Protokol Perlu Perlu 3 kadaran Ada Keadaan Ada Pemeriksaan,
Buyer Report 1 (visual) Laporan,
2009 Penilaian
5 Matriks CSP1 2010 Kajian meja Protokol Tidak Tidak Keadaan (5 Ada Keadaan, Tiada Jadual keadaan
1 (visual) perlu perlu kadaran) & Kepenting bangunan,
Keutamaan (4 an Kotak
kadaran) gambarfoto,
pelan tandaan
kecacatan
6 RICS Condition 2010 Tidak perlu Protokol Tidak Tidak 3 kadaran Ada Keadaan Tiada Pemeriksaan,
Report 1 (visual) perlu perlu Laporan
7 CP BS101 2011 Kajian meja Protokol Tidak Perlu Ada (Building Ada Keadaan, Ada Jadual keadaan
1 (visual) perlu Assessment & Kepenting bangunan,
Rating System an Kotak
– BARIS) gambarfoto,
pelan tandaan
kecacatan
And many more…
Page 13 UKM:Che-Ani 2012
14. BUILDING CONDITION SURVEY : REPORTING
Problem: No standard is adopted….
Then you need
to be
certified….but
who certified
Page 14 UKM:Che-Ani 2012
15. NEXT: ANALYSIS
Common building defects
Overall building rating
Distribution of defects
Predictive model
http://www.home-building-inspectors-ny.com/
http://www.researchrockstar.com/mark
et-research-challenge-analysis-bias/
Page 15 UKM:Che-Ani 2012
17. Table 6: BUILDING CONDITION ASSESSMENT for ECSTRACT, LANGKAWI, KEDAH
Schedule of Building Condition (CSP1 Matrix)
NEXT: ANALYSIS
Overall Building Rating
NO. AREA DEFECTS Condition Priority
Condition Survey Protocol (CSP) 1
Matrix A’lysis [c] Photo No. /
Assessment Assessment Defect Plan Tag
(a x b) (Sketch No.)
[a] [b]
A EXTERNAL Rainwater outlet
1 Front outlet: Blockage with dried leaf 2 2 4 1 1
Rainwater collector
2 Back collector: Had little gap 2 2 4 2 2
3 Back collector: Sealant fail 1 2 2 3 3
Gutter at bothsides
4 Back gutter: Blockage with dried leaf 2 2 4 4 4
Water tank
5 Water tank (front): Distortion 3 4 12 5 5
6 Water tank (back): Sagging and leaking 3 4 12 6 6
Water tank support
7 Supporting bar: Corrosion 2 2 4 7 7
Distribution board (DB)
8 Cover: Can not open and close properly 1 1 1 8 8
B MALE
First cubicle (Disable) Water closet (WC)
9 Flush does not function 2 2 4 9 9
Door
10 Misaligment 2 2 4 10 10
11 Can not close and lock properly 2 2 4 11 11
Second cubicle Water closet (WC)
12 Flush does not function 2 2 4 12 12
Tap
13 Function with low water pressure 2 2 4 13 13
Circulation Hand dryer
14 Not function and not fix at wall 2 2 4 14 14
Dustbin
15 Not properly fix at floor and sagging 1 2 2 15 15
Sink
Page 17
18. 16
17
Sink tap 1: Function with low water
pressure
Sink tap 2: Not function
2
2
2
2
NEXT: ANALYSIS
4
4
16
17
16
17
18 Outlet: Blockage 3 2 6 18 18
Lamp
19 Not function 2 2 4 19 19
Vegetation area
20 Vegetation: Not available anymore 2 2 4 20 20
C FEMALE
First cubicle (Disable) Tap
21 Function with low water pressure 2 2 4 21 21
Second cubicle Tap
Pipe disconnected and function with
22 low water pressure 2 3 6 22 22
Door
23 Can not close properly 2 2 4 23 23
Circulation Hand dryer
24 Not properly fix at wall 2 2 4 24 24
Dustbin
25 Not properly fix at floor 1 2 2 25 25
Sink
Sink tap 1: Function with low water
26 pressure 2 2 4 26 26
Sink tap 2: Function with low water
27 pressure 2 2 4 27 27
Lamp
28 Not function 2 2 4 28 28
Vegetation area
29 Vegetation: Not available anymore 2 2 4 29 29
Total marks [d] (∑ of c) 127
Number of defects [e] 29
Total score (d/e) 4.38
Overall building rating Good
Limitation(s):
1. Roof top is not inspected as there is no safe access during the time of inspection.
Page 18
Overall Building Rating
19. NEXT: ANALYSIS
5.6
5.49
5.4
5.31
5.2
Nilai skor
5.07
5
4.8 4.81
4.6
4.4
Pelajar/ K.Tangan Pelajar K.Tangan/
K.Tangan Pelawat
Kategori pengguna
Matriks CSP1
Distribution of defects:
toilet (perhaps frequency of toilet
cleaning can be reasonably
distributed)
Page 19 UKM:Che-Ani 2012
20. NEXT: ANALYSIS
Predictive model: multiple logistic regression –
school (possibly to predict the building condition with focusing to
critical defect )
1
f ( z)
Kebarangkalian (bangunan tidak selamat) = 1 e z
di mana z = -0.606 – 0.891(Dinding) + 1.372(Kasau Bumbung) +
1.961(Kekuda) + 1.968(Papak) - 1.628(Pendawaian) – 1.479(Tiang)
Page 20 UKM:Che-Ani 2012
23. NEXT: PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT
Qlassic (construction quality,
especially contractor)
Sampling guideline for
architectural works
Defects Group For Assessment Of
Architectural Works (Internal Finishes)
Weightage for
architectural elements
Page 23 UKM:Che-Ani 2012
25. NEXT: How “defect” benefit us…
It wasn’t hit by the massive earthquake. In true fashion of the Ripley Legacy, it
was built to reflect the odd 1812 earthquake that measured 8.0 on the rick.
The building has now become one of the most photographed in the world.
Page 25 UKM:Che-Ani 2012
31. SUMMARY
Start up: building defects identification – more than an “album”
Reporting: standard and certified – qualify to stand in court
Next level: building defect analysis – defects are here & there:
so what?
Next level: performance measurement – information for future
design
Next level: building defect “advantage”? – new theory around
the corner
“We do not want a structural survey. If you can just have a quick
look at the house to make sure that it is structurally sound, that
will be fine”
Page 31
(Extract from client’s letter of instruction)
UKM:Che-Ani 2012
32. Thank you very much
adiirfan@gmail.com
- reflection -
Page 32