Wikipedians, like the 18 th century crowd, do not have an “advanced” political consciousness, they do have shared values, values are both basis for bottom-up self governance (direct action) and top-down regulation
Point out: title, infobox, warning tag, bold terms in lead
Point Out: Multiple Warning Tags (warning of disputes, possible sanctions, and media organization involvement, massive archive of discussions, navigation bookmarks provided for often needed discussions)
Note the peak early on when article is being created, point out that you will only be discussing early history of article (winter/spring 2009), early history still matters because many people view article during this time (Wikipedia as news) and because some compromises reached here prove fairly durable
Explain the history of WP:ARBPIA, Explain that the talk page warns of Note that the talk page warns of increased scrutiny and active editors were warned on their talk pages,
Note that this comes up in other articles, in your anecdotal experience
Note that Nableezy is most active editor on this article and active on many articles related to Israel Palestine, as well as other issues, show how this shifts debate from transcendent truth (potentially endless) to reliable sources (concrete and available
Note that challenges to
Note that these charts show continued influence of “real world” institutional power as well as how language boundaries affect wikipedia