1. BY
PEKETI PADMAKANTH GO6159
VENKAT ASHISH GO6149
VIKAS REDDY MAREPALLY GO6148

2. About Hyderabad
 Hyderabad is the capital of Andhra Pradesh
(AP) and the fifth largest city of India. While AP
is known as the most IT savvy state, It is
emerging as a major center for IT exports.
 It’s share in Indian IT exports is about 12%
 The total extent of Hyderabad Metropolitan are
(HMA) is 1868 Sq.Km and the total population
of is about 63.83 Lakhs as per 2001 census.

3. Why This project ?
 To divert the highway traffic by passing
through the city
 Time saving.
 Connecting all the places around the
city.

4. Project Scope
 Greater Hyderabad Growth Corridor (ORR) of 167 Kms
with 8 lanes having access control arrangements.
 Complete land use plan for ‘Knowledge Corridor’(KC) in a
given areas of 20,000 acres developing the needed
modern infrastructure support systems on an area based
Land Use Plan.
 Cluster Development (CD) including fully integrated self
contained townships to enable the developer to recoup
Project Costs

7. Project Importance
 Facilitate smooth flow of traffic in city
 Efficient traffic flow to H.I.A.L.
 Decongest city with cluster development
 State to attract Global players and
investment

8. Features of Outer Ring Road
(ORR)
 8 lane divided with access control and carriage
way with design speed of 120 kmph
 4 lane facility with one emergency lane provided
for breakdown facility
 2 lane service road on both sides of the project
corridor where ever required with earthen
shoulder to accommodate noise barriers and
greenery

10. USP of the project
 To interconnect every part of the city
from the outskirts
 This is designed in such a way that the
vehicles can be travelled with out
entering in to the city
 To provide ease access of free flow of
traffic

11. Controversies
 political influences
 Rehabitation
 Outer Ring Road emerges as death way in
HYD (NDTV)
 Delayed project due to financial issues

12. Joint ventures & advantages
 Access to resources and new
technologies
 Access larger markets
 Time saving
 Rapid completion of the project
 More profits
 Risk is less

13. Differ in similar projects in the
same sector
 The length of the Bangalore ORR is
comparatively less than that of
Hyderabad
 In bangalore the traffic volume is more
when compared to Hyderabad
 Hyderabad has 8-lane+2lane service
road where as bangalore provided with
6lane+2lane service road

14. Benefits of project to society
 Boom in real estate
 Transport facility is easy
 Traffic control
 Time saving
 pollution control in the city
 Accidents can be reduced

15. Role of the manager
 Preconstruction Services support
 Administration of the project
 Acquisitions required for the construction
of the project
 Management and scheduling of the
project
 Cost control management

16. Project Implementation
 The Entire Project is proposed to be implemented in
2 Phases as under.
 Phase-I: This phase is intended to connect
Gachibowli (IT Park of Hyderabad) to Shamshabad
(proposed International Airport) with 6/8 lane
access controlled Expressway of length around 29
km- Rs 699 Crores.
 Phase-II:This phase is intended to connect
Narsingi-Kollur- Patancheru- Medchal-Shameerpet-
Peddamberpet-Turkayamjal-Shamshabad with 8
lane access controlled Expressway of length 138
Km – Rs 2500 Crores.

17.  Clover –leaf junctions, intersections, Major Bridges
and Minor Bridges to satisfy global standards of an
access controlled expressway
 Right of Way (ROW) for ORR a minimum of 125
mts and maximum of 150 mts
 As a by pass to National Highways passing through
Hyderabad –NH7 & NH 9
 Access to be provided only at junctions with
National and State Highways
 Service roads to be terminated at intersections

18. Awarding of Phase-I works of
Outer Ring Road Project
 Procurement for Phase-I works of Outer Ring
Road Project was commenced in January' 2006
in respect of both Supervision Consultancy as
well as Civil
works divided into two Contract Packages.
 1. Supervision Consultancy Contract
 2. Civil Works Contracts

19. 1. Supervision Consultancy
Contract:
 9 Nos Consultancy firms were shortlisted based on
the Expression of Interest proposals (EOI)
submitted by the firms.
 Only 4 Nos out of the above submitted their Bids in
response to the Request for Proposal (RFP) issued
by Hyderabad Growth Corridor Ltd (HGCL).
 The selection of Consultancy firm as per RFP shall
be on Quality and Cost Based Selection (QCBS)
with 80% weightage for the Technical score and
20% weightage for the Financial Score

20.  Technical Evaluation Committee (TEC)
constituted by the Government, on evaluation of
the proposals, recommended the bid of M/s
BCEOM - Aarvee (JV) as the best value bid.
 The High Level Committee (HLC) constituted by
the Government approved the above
recommendation to award the work to M/s
BCEOM - Aarvee (JV) for an amount of Rs
14,50,63,438/-

21. 2. Civil Works Contracts
 The Phase-I of ORR Project was divided into two
Contract Packages with Package-I from Km 0.000 to
11.000 (Gachibowli to APPA) and Package-II from Km
11.000 to 24.380 (APPA to Shamshabad).
Procurement for these works was commenced in
January' 2006. 22 Nos Contracting firms were pre-
qualified by the HGCL based on the proposals
submitted by them.14 Nos Contracting firms out of the
above purchased the bid documents for both the
Packages and only 10 Nos firms submitted the bids by
the due date.

22. COMPANIES

23. Project funding and govt
subsidies
 It is built by HMDA at a cost of Rs.6696
crores. with an assistance of Rs 3,123 crores
from japan international corporation agency.
 The company negotiated with Consortium of
Banks (Bank of Baroda, Andhra Bank, Indian
Overseas Bank, Vijaya Bank, Central Bank of
India ) and obtained long term loan of Rs.500 Cr
by mortgaging the lands held by HUDA for
executing the phase I of the ORR.

24. Criticism
 Much before the outer ring road (ORR) became
a ring road, it underwent several changes in the
road alignments. Influential farmers and realtors
changed the alignments to best serve their
interests at the cost of small and marginal
farmers.
 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh passed a
landmark judgment on 9 September 2010 in
which the land acquisition proceedings were
quashed for various reasons

25. Intelligent Transport
System
An Intelligent Transport System is proposed to be
developed for the Outer Ring Road. Its key
components are as follows:
A) Toll Management System (TMS)
 Manual
 Touch-and-go (or Smart Card)
 On Board Unit (with Smart Card)

26. B) Highway Traffic Management System
(HTMS)
 Emergency Communication System
 Variable Message Signs (VMS)
 Meteorological Data System
 Automatic Traffic Counter-cum-classifier
(ATCC)
 Traffic Control Centre (TCC)

28. ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE
 The Government of Andhra Pradesh formed a Special
Purpose Vehicle (SPV) for development of Outer Ring
Road (ORR) named as “Hyderabad Growth Corridor
Limited" under Companies Act 1956 on 26th December
2005 with Registration No.01-48580 with the equity
participation from INCAP(40%) and HUDA(60%).
 Subseqnently, the equity participation is restructured as
to INCAP(26%) and HUDA(74%).The following are the
Board of Directors of the Company.

29. MATRIX FORM
CHARIMAN
MR. JAWAHAR
REDDY IAS
MANAGING
DIRECTOR
Mr. RAHUL
BOJJA IAS
DIRECTOR
DIRECTOR Mr. DIRECTOR
Mr.K.V.REDDY G.JAGANNATHA Mr. YOUSUF ALI
RAO

30. PROJECT MANAGEMENT
SYSTEMS
 A new department by name "Infrastructure
& Investment department" has been
created by the Government with a view to
achieve the development and growth
objectives of the State
 The main objective of creation of this new
department is to expedite fast track
clearances and resolution of Project related
issues.

31.  The Infrastructure & Investment Department
deals with the subject of
Infrastructure, spanning the full range of
activities from attracting investment through
promotional activities, formulating
policies, monitoring and facilitation of
implementation of those projects.
 The Government, depending on the nature of a
given Project and its importance, from time to
time notify certain Projects as Infrastructure
Projects which will come under the purview of
this department.

32.  The Infrastructure & Investment dept. shall
only facilitate implementation of these
Projects and shall hand over the project after
execution to the respective line departments
for operation and maintenance.
 The Infrastructure & Investment Department
is responsible for facilitation and monitoring
of the Project from conceptualization to the
last stage in project delivery

34. THANK YOU