SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 46
Process Improvement




©Ian Sommerville 2004   Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28   Slide 1
Objectives
           To explain the principles of software process
           improvement
           To explain how software process factors
           influence software quality and productivity
           To explain how to develop simple models of
           software processes
           To explain the notion of process capability
           and the CMMI process improvement model


©Ian Sommerville 2004   Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28   Slide 2
Topics covered
           Process and product quality
           Process classification
           Process measurement
           Process analysis and modelling
           Process change
           The CMMI process improvement framework




©Ian Sommerville 2004     Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28   Slide 3
Process improvement
           Understanding existing processes and
           introducing process changes to improve
           product quality, reduce costs or accelerate
           schedules.
           Most process improvement work so far has
           focused on defect reduction. This reflects the
           increasing attention paid by industry to
           quality.
           However, other process attributes can also
           be the focus of improvement


©Ian Sommerville 2004   Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28   Slide 4
Process attributes




©Ian Sommerville 2004       Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28   Slide 5
Mea
The process improvement cycle




                    Chan
                      An
©Ian Sommerville 2004   Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28   Slide 6
Process improvement stages
         Process measurement
          •      Attributes of the current process are
                 measured. These are a baseline for
                 assessing improvements.
         Process analysis
          •      The current process is assessed and
                 bottlenecks and weaknesses are identified.
         Process change
          •      Changes to the process that have been
                 identified during the analysis are introduced.



©Ian Sommerville 2004        Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28   Slide 7
Process and product quality
           Process quality and product quality are closely
           related and process improvement benefits arise
           because the quality of the product depends on its
           development process.
           A good process is usually required to produce a
           good product.
           For manufactured goods, process is the
           principal quality determinant.
           For design-based activity, other factors are also
           involved especially the capabilities of the designers.


©Ian Sommerville 2004     Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28   Slide 8
Deo
               vlo
               eP
               tech
              Prgqu
                ye
              oces
               Pr
               odu
              qual
               qua
     Principal product quality factors




               Cos
               sch
©Ian Sommerville 2004   Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28   Slide 9
Quality factors
            For large projects with ‘average’ capabilities,
            the development process determines
            product quality.
            For small projects, the capabilities of the
            developers is the main determinant.
            The development technology is particularly
            significant for small projects.
            In all cases, if an unrealistic schedule is
            imposed then product quality will suffer.


©Ian Sommerville 2004     Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28   Slide 10
Process classification
           Informal
             •     No detailed process model. Development team chose
                   their own way of working.
           Managed
             •     Defined process model which drives the development
                   process.
           Methodical
             •     Processes supported by some development method such

                   as the RUP.
           Supported
             •     Processes supported by automated CASE tools.



©Ian Sommerville 2004            Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28   Slide 11
Pr
                   oto
               Inft-lif
               or Sho
               mal
               pr 4GL
                  usi
               ocess
                  Sm
                   sys
                        Process applicability




               Mana
               gedpl
                  Lar
                   ge
               pr R-en
               ocess
                  Lon
                  W od
                  ell-
               Metho
               pr aed
                  p
                  etion
               ocess
                   ine
©Ian Sommerville 2004        Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28   Slide 12
Process choice
           Process used should depend on type of
           product which is being developed
             •     For large systems, management is usually the principal
                   problem so you need a strictly managed process;
             •     For smaller systems, more informality is possible.
           There is no uniformly applicable process which
           should be standardised within an organisation
             •     High costs may be incurred if you force an inappropriate
                   process on a development team;
             •     Inappropriate methods can also increase costs and lead
                   to reduced quality.



©Ian Sommerville 2004          Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28   Slide 13
InfionIm
     ortgedpr
     malproc
       Mana
          Met
     pramana
     ocessSp
        proce
        ocesso
             v
                    Process tool support




      Config
         Pr red
         ojec
      manaAna
       gemeysi
     Generic
         gem
          des
     tools to
       tools
         tools
          w
          o
          kbe
©Ian Sommerville 2004    Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28   Slide 14
Process measurement
           Wherever possible, quantitative process data
           should be collected
             •     However, where organisations do not have clearly defined
                   process standards this is very difficult as you don’t know
                   what to measure. A process may have to be defined
                   before any measurement is possible.
           Process measurements should be used to
           assess process improvements
             •     But this does not mean that measurements should drive
                   the improvements. The improvement driver should be the
                   organizational objectives.



©Ian Sommerville 2004          Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28   Slide 15
Classes of process measurement
           Time taken for process activities to be
           completed
             •     E.g. Calendar time or effort to complete an
                   activity or process.
           Resources required for processes or
           activities
             •     E.g. Total effort in person-days.
           Number of occurrences of a particular event
             •     E.g. Number of defects discovered.


©Ian Sommerville 2004        Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28   Slide 16
Goal-Question-Metric Paradigm
           Goals
             •     What is the organisation trying to achieve? The
                   objective of process improvement is to satisfy
                   these goals.
           Questions
             •     Questions about areas of uncertainty related to
                   the goals. You need process knowledge to
                   derive these.
           Metrics
             •     Measurements to be collected to answer the
                   questions.

©Ian Sommerville 2004        Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28   Slide 17
Process analysis and modelling
            Process analysis
             •     The study of existing processes to understand
                   the relationships between parts of the process
                   and to compare them with other processes.
            Process modelling
             •     The documentation of a process which records
                   the tasks, the roles and the entities used;
             •     Process models may be presented from
                   different perspectives.



©Ian Sommerville 2004        Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28   Slide 18
Process analysis and modelling
           Study an existing process to understand its
           activities.
           Produce an abstract model of the process.
           You should normally represent this
           graphically. Several different views (e.g.
           activities, deliverables, etc.) may be required.
           Analyse the model to discover process
           problems. This involves discussing process
           activities with stakeholders and discovering
           problems and possible process changes.


©Ian Sommerville 2004   Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28   Slide 19
Process analysis techniques
           Published process models and process
           standards
             •     It is always best to start process analysis with an existing
                   model. People then may extend and change this.
           Questionnaires and interviews
             •     Must be carefully designed. Participants may tell you what
                   they think you want to hear.
           Ethnographic analysis
             •     Involves assimilating process knowledge by observation.
                   Best for in-depth analysis of process fragments rather
                   than for whole-process understanding.



©Ian Sommerville 2004          Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28   Slide 20
Process model elements 1
Activity                      An activity has a clearly defined objective, entry and exit
(shown as a round-edged       conditions. Examples of activities are preparing a set of test data to
rectangle with no drop        test a module, coding a fu nction or a module, proof-reading a
shadow)                       document, etc. Generally, an activity is atomic i.e. it is the
                              responsibility of one person or group. It is not decomposed into sub-
                              activities.
Process                       A p rocess is a set of activities which have some coherence and
(shown as a round-edged       whose objective is generally agreed within an organisation.
rectangle with drop           Examples of processes are requirements analysis, architectural
shadow)                       design, test planning, etc.
Deliverable                   A deliverable is a tangible output of an activity that is predicted in a
(shown as a rectangle with    project plan.
drop shadow)
Condition                     A condition is either a pre-condition that must hold before a process
(shown as a parallelogram )   or activity can start or a post-condition that holds after a p rocess or
                              activity has finished.



©Ian Sommerville 2004              Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28            Slide 21
Process model elements 2

 Role                      A role is a bounded area of responsibility. Examples of roles might
 (shown as a circle with   be configuration manager, test engineer, software designer, etc. One
 drop shadow)              person may have several different roles and a s ingle role may be
                           associated with several different people.
 Exception                 An exception is a description of how to modify the process if some
 (not shown in examples    anticipated or unanticipated event occurs. Exceptions are often
 here but may be           undefined and it is left to the ingenuity of the project managers and
 represented as a double   engineers to handle the exception.
 edged box)
 Communication             An interchange of information between people or between people
 (shown as an arrow)       and supporting computer systems. Communications may be
                           informal or formal. Formal communications might be the approval
                           of a deliverable by a p roject manager; informal communications
                           might be the interchange of electronic mail to resolve ambiguities in
                           a document.




©Ian Sommerville 2004           Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28             Slide 22
Role
       e-condPst
             o
       Prelest te
           TOu
           erAl
           eng
           inee
       Modul run
           The module testing activity



       withou
         Rspo
        err st c
        ors Sig
          fmod
          oM
           T rd
           ee
       Input
         Pr da
          oces
        Modu  f
       specif
        tionta
©Ian Sommerville 2004   Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28   Slide 23
TEdingriet
       SARSubm
       TAtionvta
       ARHARd
       TSPPerRto
        RPrION
         EEtavie
          TT TE
           D test
            ION
            Pfwe
           epar
           e ta
       Rad o w
       eN modu
           accor
       specifica
        tionmodu
            Activities in module testing

           specific
       MODU m
       LEface s
        SionPrand
        TAR rtes
          Emodule
           Aconfig
       Check Co
        outad har
         t R eesul
           e epar
              e
       freEXEtes
       omvdocor
         a RnRtest
              fa
       manatest h
       gement
       TEoneg r
       S umodul
       T pprmod
        CUTION
       Incorpor
        a onfdssio
        tt R omod
            or
            ee
       withrSrubm
       TESubmit
       Sdiscosult
       Tobeporin
       EPOR
        TIfol a
         NG r
       W otpr
       rvr ppr
        epore
         itev
       testing
       of a
        elems
         ed
©Ian Sommerville 2004   Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28   Slide 24
Process exceptions
            Software processes are complex and process
            models cannot effectively represent how to handle
            exceptions:
             •     Several key people becoming ill just before a critical
                   review;
             •     A breach of security that means all external
                   communications are out of action for several days;
             •     Organisational reorganisation;
             •     A need to respond to an unanticipated request for new
                   proposals.
            Under these circumstances, the model is suspended
            and managers use their initiative to deal with the
            exception.

©Ian Sommerville 2004          Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28   Slide 25
Process change
            Involves making modifications to existing
            processes.
            This may involve:
             •     Introducing new practices, methods or
                   processes;
             •     Changing the ordering of process activities;
             •     Introducing or removing deliverables;
             •     Introducing new roles or responsibilities.
            Change should be driven by measurable
            goals.

©Ian Sommerville 2004        Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28   Slide 26
Intr
        odu
        The process change process


        proc
        ocen
  Identify
     Priori
  improve T
     improc
     oaengi
      vmen u
      e inin
          pr
        Tin
        roed
        aR
        inee
  Pr Timp
   ocess m
    Prr F e
    ocess
  modelm
    planev
       plan
         v
         e
©Ian Sommerville 2004   Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28   Slide 27
Process change stages
            Improvement identification.
            Improvement prioritisation.
            Process change introduction.
            Process change training.
            Change tuning.




©Ian Sommerville 2004   Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28   Slide 28
The CMMI framework
            The CMMI framework is the current stage of work on
            process assessment and improvement that started
            at the Software Engineering Institute in the 1980s.
            The SEI’s mission is to promote software technology
            transfer particularly to US defence contractors.
            It has had a profound influence on process
            improvement
             •     Capability Maturity Model introduced in the early 1990s.
             •     Revised maturity framework (CMMI) introduced in 2001.




©Ian Sommerville 2004          Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28   Slide 29
Process capability assessment
            Intended as a means to assess the extent to
            which an organisation’s processes follow
            best practice.
            My providing a means for assessment, it is
            possible to identify areas of weakness for
            process improvement.
            There have been various process
            assessment and improvement models but
            the SEI work has been most influential.

©Ian Sommerville 2004   Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28   Slide 30
The SEI capability maturity model
           Initial
             •     Essentially uncontrolled
           Repeatable
             •     Product management procedures defined and used
           Defined
             •     Process management procedures and strategies defined
                   and used
           Managed
             •     Quality management strategies defined and used
           Optimising
             •     Process improvement strategies defined and used



©Ian Sommerville 2004          Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28   Slide 31
Problems with the CMM
            Practices associated with model levels
             •     Companies could be using practices from different levels
                   at the same time but if all practices from a lower level
                   were not used, it was not possible to move beyond that
                   level
            Discrete rather than continuous
             •     Did not recognise distinctions between the top and the
                   bottom of levels
            Practice-oriented
             •     Concerned with how things were done (the practices)
                   rather than the goals to be achieved.



©Ian Sommerville 2004          Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28   Slide 32
The CMMI model
            An integrated capability model that includes
            software and systems engineering capability
            assessment.
            The model has two instantiations
             •     Staged where the model is expressed in terms
                   of capability levels;
             •     Continuous where a capability rating is
                   computed.




©Ian Sommerville 2004       Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28   Slide 33
CMMI model components
            Process areas
             •     24 process areas that are relevant to process capability
                   and improvement are identified. These are organised into
                   4 groups.
            Goals
             •     Goals are descriptions of desirable organisational states.
                   Each process area has associated goals.
            Practices
             •     Practices are ways of achieving a goal - however, they
                   are advisory and other approaches to achieve the goal
                   may be used.



©Ian Sommerville 2004          Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28   Slide 34
CMMI process areas 1




©Ian Sommerville 2004   Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28   Slide 35
CMMI process areas 2




©Ian Sommerville 2004   Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28   Slide 36
CMMI goals




©Ian Sommerville 2004    Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28   Slide 37
CMMI practices
   Practice                                                Associated goal
   Analyse derived requirements to ensure that they are    The requirements are analysed and
   necessary and sufficient                                validated and a definition of the
                                                           required functionality is developed.
   Validate requirements to ensure that the resulting
   product will perform as intended in the user’s
   environment using multiple techniques as
   appropriate.
   Select the defects and other problems for analysis.     Root causes of defects and other
                                                           problems are systematically determined.
   Perform causal analysis of selected defects and other
   problems and propose actions to address them.
   Establish and maintain an organisational policy for     The process is institutionalised as a
   planning and performing the requirements                defined process.
   development process.
   Assign responsibility and authority for performing
   the process, developing the work products and
   providing the services of the requirements
   development process.



©Ian Sommerville 2004                    Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28               Slide 38
CMMI assessment
            Examines the processes used in an organisation
            and assesses their maturity in each process area.
            Based on a 6-point scale:
             •     Not performed;
             •     Performed;
             •     Managed;
             •     Defined;
             •     Quantitatively managed;
             •     Optimizing.




©Ian Sommerville 2004         Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28   Slide 39
The staged CMMI model
            Comparable with the software CMM.
            Each maturity level has process areas and
            goals. For example, the process area
            associated with the managed level include:
             •     Requirements management;
             •     Project planning;
             •     Project monitoring and control;
             •     Supplier agreement management;
             •     Measurement and analysis;
             •     Process and product quality assurance.


©Ian Sommerville 2004       Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28   Slide 40
Le
             vl
             e3Le
               vl
               e4
               Op
             Qua
              The staged CMMI model



             man
          Le
          vlLe
            vl
            e2
            Defin
           e1
          Manag
         Le
         vl
         e
         Initial
©Ian Sommerville 2004   Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28   Slide 41
Institutional practices
            Institutions operating at the managed level
            should have institutionalised practices that
            are geared to standardisation.
             •     Establish and maintain policy for performing the
                   project management process;
             •     Provide adequate resources for performing the
                   project management process;
             •     Monitor and control the project planning
                   process;
             •     Review the activities, status and results of the
                   project planning process.


©Ian Sommerville 2004        Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28   Slide 42
The continuous CMMI model
            This is a finer-grain model that considers individual
            or groups of practices and assesses their use.
            The maturity assessment is not a single value but is
            a set of values showing the organisations maturity in
            each area.
            The CMMI rates each process area from levels 1 to
            5.
            The advantage of a continuous approach is that
            organisations can pick and choose process areas to
            improve according to their local needs.


©Ian Sommerville 2004     Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28   Slide 43
Project
    and con
    Supplie
     reemen
    manage
     Risk
    manage
           A process capability profile




    Config
    manage
    Require
    manage
    V135
    erificat
    V24
     alidatio
©Ian Sommerville 2004   Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28   Slide 44
Key points
 Process improvement involves process analysis,
 standardisation, measurement and change.
 Processes can be classified as informal, managed,
 methodical and improving. This classification can be
 used to identify process tool support.
 The process improvement cycle involves process
 measurement, process analysis and process
 change.
 Process measurement should be used to answer
 specific process questions, based on organisational
 improvement goals.



©Ian Sommerville 2004   Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28   Slide 45
Key points
The three types of process metrics used in the
measurement process are time metrics, resource
utilisation metrics and event metrics.
Process models include descriptions of tasks,
activities, roles, exceptions, communications,
deliverables and other processes.
The CMMI process maturity model integrates software
and systems engineering process improvement.
Process improvement in the CMMI model is based on
reaching a set of goals related to good software
engineering practice.



©Ian Sommerville 2004   Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28   Slide 46

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente

Productivity Improvement In Sw Industry
Productivity Improvement In Sw IndustryProductivity Improvement In Sw Industry
Productivity Improvement In Sw IndustryAmit Kumar Nayak
 
Process improvement & service oriented software engineering
Process improvement & service oriented software engineeringProcess improvement & service oriented software engineering
Process improvement & service oriented software engineeringSweta Kumari Barnwal
 
MiniMax's Software Process Improvement
MiniMax's Software Process ImprovementMiniMax's Software Process Improvement
MiniMax's Software Process ImprovementTamer Salah
 
Unit II Software Testing and Quality Assurance
Unit II Software Testing and Quality AssuranceUnit II Software Testing and Quality Assurance
Unit II Software Testing and Quality AssuranceVinothkumaR Ramu
 
Presentation on Software process improvement in GSD
Presentation on Software process improvement in GSDPresentation on Software process improvement in GSD
Presentation on Software process improvement in GSDRafi Ullah
 
Capability Maturity Model
Capability Maturity ModelCapability Maturity Model
Capability Maturity ModelUzair Akram
 
Software Process in software engineering
Software Process in software engineeringSoftware Process in software engineering
Software Process in software engineeringMuhammadTalha436
 
Process model in SE
Process model in SEProcess model in SE
Process model in SEsuranisaunak
 
CMMI - High Maturity Misconceptions and Pitfalls
CMMI - High Maturity Misconceptions and PitfallsCMMI - High Maturity Misconceptions and Pitfalls
CMMI - High Maturity Misconceptions and PitfallsRajesh Naik
 
Unit4 Software Engineering Institute (SEI)’s Capability Maturity Model (CMM) ...
Unit4 Software Engineering Institute (SEI)’sCapability Maturity Model (CMM)...Unit4 Software Engineering Institute (SEI)’sCapability Maturity Model (CMM)...
Unit4 Software Engineering Institute (SEI)’s Capability Maturity Model (CMM) ...Reetesh Gupta
 
CP7301 Software Process and Project Management notes
CP7301 Software Process and Project Management   notesCP7301 Software Process and Project Management   notes
CP7301 Software Process and Project Management notesAAKASH S
 
Improving of software processes
Improving of software processesImproving of software processes
Improving of software processesREHMAT ULLAH
 
المحاضرة الرابعة والخامسة
المحاضرة الرابعة والخامسةالمحاضرة الرابعة والخامسة
المحاضرة الرابعة والخامسةAhmed Alageed
 
CMMI High Maturity Best Practices HMBP 2010: Deploying High Maturity Practice...
CMMI High Maturity Best Practices HMBP 2010: Deploying High Maturity Practice...CMMI High Maturity Best Practices HMBP 2010: Deploying High Maturity Practice...
CMMI High Maturity Best Practices HMBP 2010: Deploying High Maturity Practice...QAI
 
Software process life cycles
Software process life cyclesSoftware process life cycles
Software process life cycles sathish sak
 

La actualidad más candente (20)

Productivity Improvement In Sw Industry
Productivity Improvement In Sw IndustryProductivity Improvement In Sw Industry
Productivity Improvement In Sw Industry
 
Process improvement & service oriented software engineering
Process improvement & service oriented software engineeringProcess improvement & service oriented software engineering
Process improvement & service oriented software engineering
 
MiniMax's Software Process Improvement
MiniMax's Software Process ImprovementMiniMax's Software Process Improvement
MiniMax's Software Process Improvement
 
13 software metrics
13 software metrics13 software metrics
13 software metrics
 
Unit II Software Testing and Quality Assurance
Unit II Software Testing and Quality AssuranceUnit II Software Testing and Quality Assurance
Unit II Software Testing and Quality Assurance
 
Presentation on Software process improvement in GSD
Presentation on Software process improvement in GSDPresentation on Software process improvement in GSD
Presentation on Software process improvement in GSD
 
Capability Maturity Model
Capability Maturity ModelCapability Maturity Model
Capability Maturity Model
 
Software Process in software engineering
Software Process in software engineeringSoftware Process in software engineering
Software Process in software engineering
 
Road map to cmm
Road map to cmmRoad map to cmm
Road map to cmm
 
Process model in SE
Process model in SEProcess model in SE
Process model in SE
 
CMMI - High Maturity Misconceptions and Pitfalls
CMMI - High Maturity Misconceptions and PitfallsCMMI - High Maturity Misconceptions and Pitfalls
CMMI - High Maturity Misconceptions and Pitfalls
 
Software Process Improvement - RKREDDY
Software Process Improvement - RKREDDYSoftware Process Improvement - RKREDDY
Software Process Improvement - RKREDDY
 
Chap21
Chap21Chap21
Chap21
 
Unit4 Software Engineering Institute (SEI)’s Capability Maturity Model (CMM) ...
Unit4 Software Engineering Institute (SEI)’sCapability Maturity Model (CMM)...Unit4 Software Engineering Institute (SEI)’sCapability Maturity Model (CMM)...
Unit4 Software Engineering Institute (SEI)’s Capability Maturity Model (CMM) ...
 
CP7301 Software Process and Project Management notes
CP7301 Software Process and Project Management   notesCP7301 Software Process and Project Management   notes
CP7301 Software Process and Project Management notes
 
Improving of software processes
Improving of software processesImproving of software processes
Improving of software processes
 
SQA_Class
SQA_ClassSQA_Class
SQA_Class
 
المحاضرة الرابعة والخامسة
المحاضرة الرابعة والخامسةالمحاضرة الرابعة والخامسة
المحاضرة الرابعة والخامسة
 
CMMI High Maturity Best Practices HMBP 2010: Deploying High Maturity Practice...
CMMI High Maturity Best Practices HMBP 2010: Deploying High Maturity Practice...CMMI High Maturity Best Practices HMBP 2010: Deploying High Maturity Practice...
CMMI High Maturity Best Practices HMBP 2010: Deploying High Maturity Practice...
 
Software process life cycles
Software process life cyclesSoftware process life cycles
Software process life cycles
 

Similar a Ch28 (20)

Quality management 27
Quality management 27Quality management 27
Quality management 27
 
Software Engineering The Multiview Approach And Wisdm
Software Engineering   The Multiview Approach And WisdmSoftware Engineering   The Multiview Approach And Wisdm
Software Engineering The Multiview Approach And Wisdm
 
Verification and validation
Verification and validationVerification and validation
Verification and validation
 
Software Processes
Software Processes Software Processes
Software Processes
 
Evolution-2.ppt
Evolution-2.pptEvolution-2.ppt
Evolution-2.ppt
 
Ppt en 5
Ppt en 5Ppt en 5
Ppt en 5
 
Ch1
Ch1Ch1
Ch1
 
Ch5
Ch5Ch5
Ch5
 
Introduction to Software Engineering
Introduction to Software EngineeringIntroduction to Software Engineering
Introduction to Software Engineering
 
01 unidad i introduccion
01 unidad i   introduccion01 unidad i   introduccion
01 unidad i introduccion
 
Introduction to Software Enigneering
Introduction to Software Enigneering Introduction to Software Enigneering
Introduction to Software Enigneering
 
Ch27 (1)
Ch27 (1)Ch27 (1)
Ch27 (1)
 
962 sech04
962 sech04962 sech04
962 sech04
 
ch1.ppt
ch1.pptch1.ppt
ch1.ppt
 
Ch5
Ch5Ch5
Ch5
 
Ch1
Ch1Ch1
Ch1
 
Week_02.pptx
Week_02.pptxWeek_02.pptx
Week_02.pptx
 
Process Models IN software Engineering
Process Models IN software EngineeringProcess Models IN software Engineering
Process Models IN software Engineering
 
Lecture 4.pdf
Lecture 4.pdfLecture 4.pdf
Lecture 4.pdf
 
Chapter 2_Process Models sunorgamisedASE_finalised.ppt
Chapter 2_Process Models sunorgamisedASE_finalised.pptChapter 2_Process Models sunorgamisedASE_finalised.ppt
Chapter 2_Process Models sunorgamisedASE_finalised.ppt
 

Ch28

  • 1. Process Improvement ©Ian Sommerville 2004 Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28 Slide 1
  • 2. Objectives To explain the principles of software process improvement To explain how software process factors influence software quality and productivity To explain how to develop simple models of software processes To explain the notion of process capability and the CMMI process improvement model ©Ian Sommerville 2004 Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28 Slide 2
  • 3. Topics covered Process and product quality Process classification Process measurement Process analysis and modelling Process change The CMMI process improvement framework ©Ian Sommerville 2004 Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28 Slide 3
  • 4. Process improvement Understanding existing processes and introducing process changes to improve product quality, reduce costs or accelerate schedules. Most process improvement work so far has focused on defect reduction. This reflects the increasing attention paid by industry to quality. However, other process attributes can also be the focus of improvement ©Ian Sommerville 2004 Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28 Slide 4
  • 5. Process attributes ©Ian Sommerville 2004 Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28 Slide 5
  • 6. Mea The process improvement cycle Chan An ©Ian Sommerville 2004 Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28 Slide 6
  • 7. Process improvement stages Process measurement • Attributes of the current process are measured. These are a baseline for assessing improvements. Process analysis • The current process is assessed and bottlenecks and weaknesses are identified. Process change • Changes to the process that have been identified during the analysis are introduced. ©Ian Sommerville 2004 Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28 Slide 7
  • 8. Process and product quality Process quality and product quality are closely related and process improvement benefits arise because the quality of the product depends on its development process. A good process is usually required to produce a good product. For manufactured goods, process is the principal quality determinant. For design-based activity, other factors are also involved especially the capabilities of the designers. ©Ian Sommerville 2004 Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28 Slide 8
  • 9. Deo vlo eP tech Prgqu ye oces Pr odu qual qua Principal product quality factors Cos sch ©Ian Sommerville 2004 Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28 Slide 9
  • 10. Quality factors For large projects with ‘average’ capabilities, the development process determines product quality. For small projects, the capabilities of the developers is the main determinant. The development technology is particularly significant for small projects. In all cases, if an unrealistic schedule is imposed then product quality will suffer. ©Ian Sommerville 2004 Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28 Slide 10
  • 11. Process classification Informal • No detailed process model. Development team chose their own way of working. Managed • Defined process model which drives the development process. Methodical • Processes supported by some development method such as the RUP. Supported • Processes supported by automated CASE tools. ©Ian Sommerville 2004 Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28 Slide 11
  • 12. Pr oto Inft-lif or Sho mal pr 4GL usi ocess Sm sys Process applicability Mana gedpl Lar ge pr R-en ocess Lon W od ell- Metho pr aed p etion ocess ine ©Ian Sommerville 2004 Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28 Slide 12
  • 13. Process choice Process used should depend on type of product which is being developed • For large systems, management is usually the principal problem so you need a strictly managed process; • For smaller systems, more informality is possible. There is no uniformly applicable process which should be standardised within an organisation • High costs may be incurred if you force an inappropriate process on a development team; • Inappropriate methods can also increase costs and lead to reduced quality. ©Ian Sommerville 2004 Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28 Slide 13
  • 14. InfionIm ortgedpr malproc Mana Met pramana ocessSp proce ocesso v Process tool support Config Pr red ojec manaAna gemeysi Generic gem des tools to tools tools w o kbe ©Ian Sommerville 2004 Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28 Slide 14
  • 15. Process measurement Wherever possible, quantitative process data should be collected • However, where organisations do not have clearly defined process standards this is very difficult as you don’t know what to measure. A process may have to be defined before any measurement is possible. Process measurements should be used to assess process improvements • But this does not mean that measurements should drive the improvements. The improvement driver should be the organizational objectives. ©Ian Sommerville 2004 Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28 Slide 15
  • 16. Classes of process measurement Time taken for process activities to be completed • E.g. Calendar time or effort to complete an activity or process. Resources required for processes or activities • E.g. Total effort in person-days. Number of occurrences of a particular event • E.g. Number of defects discovered. ©Ian Sommerville 2004 Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28 Slide 16
  • 17. Goal-Question-Metric Paradigm Goals • What is the organisation trying to achieve? The objective of process improvement is to satisfy these goals. Questions • Questions about areas of uncertainty related to the goals. You need process knowledge to derive these. Metrics • Measurements to be collected to answer the questions. ©Ian Sommerville 2004 Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28 Slide 17
  • 18. Process analysis and modelling Process analysis • The study of existing processes to understand the relationships between parts of the process and to compare them with other processes. Process modelling • The documentation of a process which records the tasks, the roles and the entities used; • Process models may be presented from different perspectives. ©Ian Sommerville 2004 Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28 Slide 18
  • 19. Process analysis and modelling Study an existing process to understand its activities. Produce an abstract model of the process. You should normally represent this graphically. Several different views (e.g. activities, deliverables, etc.) may be required. Analyse the model to discover process problems. This involves discussing process activities with stakeholders and discovering problems and possible process changes. ©Ian Sommerville 2004 Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28 Slide 19
  • 20. Process analysis techniques Published process models and process standards • It is always best to start process analysis with an existing model. People then may extend and change this. Questionnaires and interviews • Must be carefully designed. Participants may tell you what they think you want to hear. Ethnographic analysis • Involves assimilating process knowledge by observation. Best for in-depth analysis of process fragments rather than for whole-process understanding. ©Ian Sommerville 2004 Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28 Slide 20
  • 21. Process model elements 1 Activity An activity has a clearly defined objective, entry and exit (shown as a round-edged conditions. Examples of activities are preparing a set of test data to rectangle with no drop test a module, coding a fu nction or a module, proof-reading a shadow) document, etc. Generally, an activity is atomic i.e. it is the responsibility of one person or group. It is not decomposed into sub- activities. Process A p rocess is a set of activities which have some coherence and (shown as a round-edged whose objective is generally agreed within an organisation. rectangle with drop Examples of processes are requirements analysis, architectural shadow) design, test planning, etc. Deliverable A deliverable is a tangible output of an activity that is predicted in a (shown as a rectangle with project plan. drop shadow) Condition A condition is either a pre-condition that must hold before a process (shown as a parallelogram ) or activity can start or a post-condition that holds after a p rocess or activity has finished. ©Ian Sommerville 2004 Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28 Slide 21
  • 22. Process model elements 2 Role A role is a bounded area of responsibility. Examples of roles might (shown as a circle with be configuration manager, test engineer, software designer, etc. One drop shadow) person may have several different roles and a s ingle role may be associated with several different people. Exception An exception is a description of how to modify the process if some (not shown in examples anticipated or unanticipated event occurs. Exceptions are often here but may be undefined and it is left to the ingenuity of the project managers and represented as a double engineers to handle the exception. edged box) Communication An interchange of information between people or between people (shown as an arrow) and supporting computer systems. Communications may be informal or formal. Formal communications might be the approval of a deliverable by a p roject manager; informal communications might be the interchange of electronic mail to resolve ambiguities in a document. ©Ian Sommerville 2004 Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28 Slide 22
  • 23. Role e-condPst o Prelest te TOu erAl eng inee Modul run The module testing activity withou Rspo err st c ors Sig fmod oM T rd ee Input Pr da oces Modu f specif tionta ©Ian Sommerville 2004 Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28 Slide 23
  • 24. TEdingriet SARSubm TAtionvta ARHARd TSPPerRto RPrION EEtavie TT TE D test ION Pfwe epar e ta Rad o w eN modu accor specifica tionmodu Activities in module testing specific MODU m LEface s SionPrand TAR rtes Emodule Aconfig Check Co outad har t R eesul e epar e freEXEtes omvdocor a RnRtest fa manatest h gement TEoneg r S umodul T pprmod CUTION Incorpor a onfdssio tt R omod or ee withrSrubm TESubmit Sdiscosult Tobeporin EPOR TIfol a NG r W otpr rvr ppr epore itev testing of a elems ed ©Ian Sommerville 2004 Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28 Slide 24
  • 25. Process exceptions Software processes are complex and process models cannot effectively represent how to handle exceptions: • Several key people becoming ill just before a critical review; • A breach of security that means all external communications are out of action for several days; • Organisational reorganisation; • A need to respond to an unanticipated request for new proposals. Under these circumstances, the model is suspended and managers use their initiative to deal with the exception. ©Ian Sommerville 2004 Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28 Slide 25
  • 26. Process change Involves making modifications to existing processes. This may involve: • Introducing new practices, methods or processes; • Changing the ordering of process activities; • Introducing or removing deliverables; • Introducing new roles or responsibilities. Change should be driven by measurable goals. ©Ian Sommerville 2004 Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28 Slide 26
  • 27. Intr odu The process change process proc ocen Identify Priori improve T improc oaengi vmen u e inin pr Tin roed aR inee Pr Timp ocess m Prr F e ocess modelm planev plan v e ©Ian Sommerville 2004 Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28 Slide 27
  • 28. Process change stages Improvement identification. Improvement prioritisation. Process change introduction. Process change training. Change tuning. ©Ian Sommerville 2004 Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28 Slide 28
  • 29. The CMMI framework The CMMI framework is the current stage of work on process assessment and improvement that started at the Software Engineering Institute in the 1980s. The SEI’s mission is to promote software technology transfer particularly to US defence contractors. It has had a profound influence on process improvement • Capability Maturity Model introduced in the early 1990s. • Revised maturity framework (CMMI) introduced in 2001. ©Ian Sommerville 2004 Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28 Slide 29
  • 30. Process capability assessment Intended as a means to assess the extent to which an organisation’s processes follow best practice. My providing a means for assessment, it is possible to identify areas of weakness for process improvement. There have been various process assessment and improvement models but the SEI work has been most influential. ©Ian Sommerville 2004 Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28 Slide 30
  • 31. The SEI capability maturity model Initial • Essentially uncontrolled Repeatable • Product management procedures defined and used Defined • Process management procedures and strategies defined and used Managed • Quality management strategies defined and used Optimising • Process improvement strategies defined and used ©Ian Sommerville 2004 Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28 Slide 31
  • 32. Problems with the CMM Practices associated with model levels • Companies could be using practices from different levels at the same time but if all practices from a lower level were not used, it was not possible to move beyond that level Discrete rather than continuous • Did not recognise distinctions between the top and the bottom of levels Practice-oriented • Concerned with how things were done (the practices) rather than the goals to be achieved. ©Ian Sommerville 2004 Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28 Slide 32
  • 33. The CMMI model An integrated capability model that includes software and systems engineering capability assessment. The model has two instantiations • Staged where the model is expressed in terms of capability levels; • Continuous where a capability rating is computed. ©Ian Sommerville 2004 Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28 Slide 33
  • 34. CMMI model components Process areas • 24 process areas that are relevant to process capability and improvement are identified. These are organised into 4 groups. Goals • Goals are descriptions of desirable organisational states. Each process area has associated goals. Practices • Practices are ways of achieving a goal - however, they are advisory and other approaches to achieve the goal may be used. ©Ian Sommerville 2004 Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28 Slide 34
  • 35. CMMI process areas 1 ©Ian Sommerville 2004 Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28 Slide 35
  • 36. CMMI process areas 2 ©Ian Sommerville 2004 Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28 Slide 36
  • 37. CMMI goals ©Ian Sommerville 2004 Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28 Slide 37
  • 38. CMMI practices Practice Associated goal Analyse derived requirements to ensure that they are The requirements are analysed and necessary and sufficient validated and a definition of the required functionality is developed. Validate requirements to ensure that the resulting product will perform as intended in the user’s environment using multiple techniques as appropriate. Select the defects and other problems for analysis. Root causes of defects and other problems are systematically determined. Perform causal analysis of selected defects and other problems and propose actions to address them. Establish and maintain an organisational policy for The process is institutionalised as a planning and performing the requirements defined process. development process. Assign responsibility and authority for performing the process, developing the work products and providing the services of the requirements development process. ©Ian Sommerville 2004 Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28 Slide 38
  • 39. CMMI assessment Examines the processes used in an organisation and assesses their maturity in each process area. Based on a 6-point scale: • Not performed; • Performed; • Managed; • Defined; • Quantitatively managed; • Optimizing. ©Ian Sommerville 2004 Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28 Slide 39
  • 40. The staged CMMI model Comparable with the software CMM. Each maturity level has process areas and goals. For example, the process area associated with the managed level include: • Requirements management; • Project planning; • Project monitoring and control; • Supplier agreement management; • Measurement and analysis; • Process and product quality assurance. ©Ian Sommerville 2004 Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28 Slide 40
  • 41. Le vl e3Le vl e4 Op Qua The staged CMMI model man Le vlLe vl e2 Defin e1 Manag Le vl e Initial ©Ian Sommerville 2004 Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28 Slide 41
  • 42. Institutional practices Institutions operating at the managed level should have institutionalised practices that are geared to standardisation. • Establish and maintain policy for performing the project management process; • Provide adequate resources for performing the project management process; • Monitor and control the project planning process; • Review the activities, status and results of the project planning process. ©Ian Sommerville 2004 Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28 Slide 42
  • 43. The continuous CMMI model This is a finer-grain model that considers individual or groups of practices and assesses their use. The maturity assessment is not a single value but is a set of values showing the organisations maturity in each area. The CMMI rates each process area from levels 1 to 5. The advantage of a continuous approach is that organisations can pick and choose process areas to improve according to their local needs. ©Ian Sommerville 2004 Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28 Slide 43
  • 44. Project and con Supplie reemen manage Risk manage A process capability profile Config manage Require manage V135 erificat V24 alidatio ©Ian Sommerville 2004 Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28 Slide 44
  • 45. Key points Process improvement involves process analysis, standardisation, measurement and change. Processes can be classified as informal, managed, methodical and improving. This classification can be used to identify process tool support. The process improvement cycle involves process measurement, process analysis and process change. Process measurement should be used to answer specific process questions, based on organisational improvement goals. ©Ian Sommerville 2004 Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28 Slide 45
  • 46. Key points The three types of process metrics used in the measurement process are time metrics, resource utilisation metrics and event metrics. Process models include descriptions of tasks, activities, roles, exceptions, communications, deliverables and other processes. The CMMI process maturity model integrates software and systems engineering process improvement. Process improvement in the CMMI model is based on reaching a set of goals related to good software engineering practice. ©Ian Sommerville 2004 Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 28 Slide 46