2. Definitions
Paradigm: Shared worldview, or
knowledge “landscape” and all its
implications within which a
discipline legitimately operates
Paradigm Shift: A profound
change in the underlying model
that increases its capacity to
explain observed phenomena; a
higher-order understanding. The Thinker - Rodin
3. Signs of Paradigm Problems
Accumulating anomalies that
the paradigm cannot explain.
Competing concepts, theories,
and principles.
Diverse interpretations of
observations and experience.
Anomalies, disagreements,
and diversity are increasingly
important.
4. What if…
Instead of the mantra that
organizational culture must
change for knowledge
management to succeed,
We ask the question: “Given an
existing culture, what can
knowledge management do to
leverage the value of
organizational knowledge and
increase the productivity of
knowledge work?”
7. Knowledge Infrastructure
work routines
lessons learned,
best practices,
People
learning, motivation,
rewards, incentives,
staffing, skills
roles, responsibilities,
authorities, resources
Content,
Services
data, risk analysis,
reports, monitoring,
operations, policies
Tools
systems to
capture, store,
share, and
process content
KM Levels
Governance
Processes
8. Knowledge Assets
Capture: Represent explicit or tacit
knowledge on reproducible media
Inventory: Find, list, and describe
knowledge; map to business needs,
value and prioritize
Needs: What needs to be known to
accomplish organizational goals; identify
core knowledge
Gaps: Difference between what is known
and what needs to be known
Preserve: organize, store, search &
retrieval, maintain and migrate
throughout life-cycle
KM Levels
10. Collaboration
Dialogue, conversations in groups
Sharing, exchanges among peers
Candor, freedom of expression
Trust, safety, honesty
Transparency, openness
Agreed rules of conduct
Diversity, flexibility, outliers
Equality, meritocracy of ideas
Collective, not individual benefit
KM Levels
11. Social Network Principles
Openness – collaboration based
on candor, transparency, freedom,
flexibility, and accessibility.
Peering – horizontal voluntary
meritocracy, based on fun,
altruism, or personal values.
Sharing – increased value of
common products benefits all
participants.
Acting Globally – value is
created through large knowledge
ecosystems.
Cass Sunstein (2006)
KM Levels
13. Knowledge Transfer
Communications: one-way dissemination of approved
messages and positions.
Transaction: two-way exchanges of knowledge
products & services.
Parallel: Transferring knowledge products & services
from or to two or more providers or users.
Sequential: Multiple organizations sequentially produce
and transfer knowledge products & services.
Cyclic: Knowledge service “value chains” continuously
create and transfer new knowledge.
Network: Interactions among large numbers of
participants in a “knowledge ecosystem.”
KM Levels
17. Engagement
Autonomy: (agreed task, flexible schedule, select
technique, choose team)
Mastery: (mindset, takes time and effort, is asymptotic)
Purpose: (meaningful goals, words are important,
policies)
Daniel Pink (2009)
Creation
19. Communities Create & Validate
Knowledge
Knowledge exists in the minds of people. Experience is
as important as formal knowledge.
Knowledge is tacit as well as explicit. Transferring tacit
knowledge is more effective through human interaction.
Knowledge is social as well as individual. Today’s
knowledge is the result of centuries of collective research.
Knowledge is changing at an accelerating rate. It takes a
community of people to keep up with new concepts,
practices, and technology.
Validation
20. Participants
- Help with their work
- Solve problems
- Find experts
- Receive feedback
- Place to learn
- Enhance reputation
Management
- Connect isolated experts
- Coordinate activities
- Fast problem solving
- Reduce development time
- Standardize processes
- Develop & retain talent
Community Benefits
Outputs
- Tangible: documents, reports, manuals, recommendations,
reduced innovation time and cost
- Intangible: increased skills, sense of trust, relationships,
diverse perspectives, capacity to innovate, spirit of enquiry
Validation
21. Harvesting Methods
Service Center: repository for community outputs;
interface with communities, minimize duplication, inform
communities
Leader: transfer community outputs; Identify emerging
trends, prioritize issues
Sponsor: endorse community outputs; bridge between
the community and the organization, provide support,
minimize organizational barriers
Champion: ensure adoption of community outputs;
communicate purpose, promote the community
Validation
23. Knowledge Services Value Chain
Use
Internally
Use
Professionally
Use
Personally
Create Transform Add Value
Transfer EvaluateManage
Extract
Advance
Embed
Legend
S&T Partners Centre for
Security
Science
Practitioners &
Stakeholders
Organization
24. Knowledge Creation Process
Legend:
Work
Output
Service
Social
Statistical apps.
Store
Analyze
Body of
knowledge Review
Literature
Experimental
design
Test
Experiment
inadequate
adequate
Write
Review
Publish
Edit
Hypothesis
Data
Tacit
Explicit
Product
Gap
Library,
Web,
Search
Expertise
Office app.
Data mgt.
Analysis apps.
Interface
Collaboration
Organization
27. Authorization
Understanding – Keep it simple; one message with stories and
multiple analogies from different perspectives.
Experience – Do your homework; pre-brief decision makers, solicit
opinions, negotiate objections (to a point).
Resources – Pick low-hanging fruit; plan low cost, small effort, low
impact activities.
Management – Think big, start small; divide into small projects with
measurable, high-impact deliverables.
Submission – Leadership is essential; bypass unjustified
objections, accept majority vote, authorize work.
Authorization
28. Sustainability
Leadership – Outputs must be delivered within a leader’s tenure;
preferably, get them institutionalized.
Governance – Representative, federated decision making is the only
sustainable governance for knowledge work.
Reorganization – Align a project/activity with the organizational
business model.
Priorities – Align the project/activity with the organization’s long-term
strategy
Support – Deliver initial outputs when & as promised; be prepared to
adapt to changing priorities.
Culture – Develop favorable policies, reward desired behavior, leverage
work, implement helpful systems.
Authorization
32. Definitions
Authoritative Hierarchy: Knowledge creation, management,
and use can be completely, totally, or entirely mandated,
governed, structured, and evaluated. (>90%)
Organizational Structure: Knowledge creation, management,
and use can be predominantly, generally, or mostly
mandated, governed, structured, and evaluated. (50%-90%)
Negotiated Agreement: Knowledge creation, management,
and use can be partly, nominally, or incompletely mandated,
governed, structured, and evaluated. (10%-50%)
Responsible Autonomy: Knowledge creation, management,
and use can be slightly, minimally, or not mandated,
governed, structured, and evaluated. (10%<)
Manageability
35. Main Messages
There are six knowledge
management levels.
There are four knowledge
management regimes
Knowledge flows across all
levels and regimes.
This is a new paradigm for
knowledge management. M. C. Escher (1957)
“Cube with Magic Ribbons”
http://cradpdf.drdc-rddc.gc.ca/PDFS/unc118/p536618_A1b.pdf