SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 9
Creating A New Clinical Assessment Tool for
Trials in Early Alzheimer’s Disease
Veronika Logovinsky, MD, PhD
Eisai Inc.




                               © 2012 Eisai Inc.
Background and Objectives

•   Convergent efforts within Alzheimer’s disease (AD) field to treat
    early stages of disease
•   Disease modification treatments need to be studied in Early AD
    populations
•   Early AD population: disease continuum from MCI to mild
    Alzheimer’s dementia
•   Widely recognized by the AD community that no standard
    clinical endpoints exist that are sensitive to disease progression
    and treatment effect in Early AD
•   Significant burden for conducting trials in Early AD (particularly
    MCI) → long and large trials, difficult to impossible to manage

                                                                         2
                               Eisai Confidential
Development of New Composite Measure at Eisai

• Assumptions
  – Certain items in existing clinical scales are sensitive for early disease stages
  – Can develop and optimize new assessment by selecting and combining these
    items
• Approach
  – Develop a statistical model to analyze placebo data across multiple MCI
    studies over 1 year
  – Determine most sensitive combination of items from existing clinical tools
    (ADAS-Cog, MMSE, CDR-SB, NTB, …)  the new clinical measure
  – Assess behavior of the new tool across multiple mild Alzheimer’s dementia
    studies
  – Assess sensitivity of the new tool to treatment effects in MCI and mild
    Alzheimer’s dementia



                                                                                       3
                                      Eisai Confidential
Final Composite:
       Items and Their Relative Contributions
                                                                              % of
                                 Maximum      % of               Observed
                                                                            Composite
                                 Possible   Composite            Maximum
                                                                            Observed
        Delayed Word Recall         10          4%                  10         6%       • ADAS-cog items
                                                                                          contribute ~22%
            Orientation             8           7%                  7          9%
ADAS




                                                                                          (vs. ~17%
         Word Recognition           12          2%                  12         3%         possible)

       Word Finding Difficulty      5           4%                  4          4%       • MMSE items
                                                                                          contribute ~18%
MMSE




        Orientation to Time         5          11%                  5         15%
                                                                                          (vs. ~13%
       Constructional Praxis        1           2%                  1          3%         possible)
           Personal Care            3           8%                  1          4%       • CDR-sb items
         Community Affairs          3          17%                  2         15%         contribute ~61%
                                                                                          (vs. ~71%
        Home and Hobbies            3          14%                  2         13%         possible)
CDR




       Judgment and Problem
                                    3          11%                  2         10%
             Solving
              Memory                3           9%                  2          8%
            Orientation             3          12%                  2         11%

                                                                                                            4
                                            Eisai Confidential
New Composite Has Been Extensively Tested and
Validated with Retrospective Data

• Split sample validation and reliability
• Responsiveness to change with disease progression
  – Compare Mean to Standard Deviation Ratio (MSDR) between the composite
    and standard scales
     • MCI population
     • Enriched MCI subgroups (CSF Aβ positive and ApoE4 positive)
     • Mild Alzheimer’s dementia patient population combining placebo data from
       3 studies
• Responsiveness to treatment effect
  – MCI population
  – Mild Alzheimer’s dementia




                                                                                  5
                                  Eisai Confidential
New Composite Improves Responsiveness/Sample Size
                      Required Compared to Original Scales
                      7000
                                                    5000              Pooled
                                                                                 2000
                                                                      MCI

                      6000                                            APOε4
                                                                      Carrier
Sample Size per arm




                                                    4000              MCI CSF
                      5000                                            Aβ(1-42)
                                                                      Pooled
                                                                      Mild AD
                      4000                          3000

                                                                                 1000
                      3000
                                                    2000

                      2000

                                                    1000
                      1000


                        0                              0                           0
                             ADAS-cog   Composite          MMSE   Composite             CDR   Composite
                                          Score                     Score                       Score
Responsiveness to Treatment Effect: Difference of Donepezil
   Versus Placebo in Change from Baseline

                                         Study                               ADAS-
                      Population                       Treatment†                     CDR-SB       MMSE    ADCOMS
Study                                   duration                              Cog
Eisai donepezil
                           MCI            12 mo           10 mg                -          -            -     -
Study 1
Eisai donepezil                                            5 mg                +          -            +     +
                        Mild AD           6 mo
Study 3                                                   10 mg                +          -            -     +
                                                          10 mg                -          -            +     +
ADCS                       MCI            12 mo          2000 IU
                                                                               -          -            -     -
                                                        Vitamin E
+ indicates statistical significance at alpha=0.05; - indicated statistical significance was not reached
† Treatment was donepezil unless otherwise indicated

  • Responsiveness to treatment effect is driven by ADAS-Cog and MMSE
  • CDR-SB alone is not responsive to treatment effect



                                                                                                                    7
                                                        Eisai Confidential
Summary

• Improved sensitivity to decline
• Allows for substantially smaller sample sizes
• Responsive to current treatments
• Valid as a clinical outcome
• Can be used as single primary outcome assessment for Early AD studies

Eisai recently initiated large Phase 2 study with BAN2401 (monoclonal
antibody directed against protofibrils)
New composite is used as clinical outcome assessment in the study




                                                                          8
                                    Eisai Confidential
Thanks!
Eisai Inc.
•   Andrew Satlin
•   Jinping Wang
•   Carlos Perdomo
•   Shobha Dhadda
•   Ira Do
•   Martin Rabe


Pentara
• Suzanne B. Hendrix
• Stephanie Stanworth




                                             9
                        Eisai Confidential

More Related Content

More from Alzforum

More from Alzforum (20)

Protein-RNA Complexes, ALS and Aging
Protein-RNA Complexes, ALS and AgingProtein-RNA Complexes, ALS and Aging
Protein-RNA Complexes, ALS and Aging
 
Lifespan vs. Healthspan
Lifespan vs. HealthspanLifespan vs. Healthspan
Lifespan vs. Healthspan
 
Genetic regulation of human brain aging
Genetic regulation of human brain agingGenetic regulation of human brain aging
Genetic regulation of human brain aging
 
Marc Dhenain Alzforum Webinar - Dec 7, 2016
Marc Dhenain Alzforum Webinar - Dec 7, 2016Marc Dhenain Alzforum Webinar - Dec 7, 2016
Marc Dhenain Alzforum Webinar - Dec 7, 2016
 
Peter Nelson Alzforum Webinar - Dec 7, 2016
Peter Nelson Alzforum Webinar - Dec 7, 2016Peter Nelson Alzforum Webinar - Dec 7, 2016
Peter Nelson Alzforum Webinar - Dec 7, 2016
 
Elizabeth Head Alzforum Webinar - Dec 7, 2016
Elizabeth Head Alzforum Webinar - Dec 7, 2016Elizabeth Head Alzforum Webinar - Dec 7, 2016
Elizabeth Head Alzforum Webinar - Dec 7, 2016
 
Patrick Hof Alzforum Webinar - Dec 7, 2016
Patrick Hof Alzforum Webinar - Dec 7, 2016Patrick Hof Alzforum Webinar - Dec 7, 2016
Patrick Hof Alzforum Webinar - Dec 7, 2016
 
Lary Walker Introduction Webinar
Lary Walker Introduction WebinarLary Walker Introduction Webinar
Lary Walker Introduction Webinar
 
Bob Olsson - Alzforum Live Webinar April 29, 2016
Bob Olsson - Alzforum Live Webinar April 29, 2016Bob Olsson - Alzforum Live Webinar April 29, 2016
Bob Olsson - Alzforum Live Webinar April 29, 2016
 
Henrik Zetterberg - Alzforum webinar April 29, 2016
Henrik Zetterberg - Alzforum webinar April 29, 2016Henrik Zetterberg - Alzforum webinar April 29, 2016
Henrik Zetterberg - Alzforum webinar April 29, 2016
 
Johannes Streffer - Alzforum webinar April 29, 2016
Johannes Streffer - Alzforum webinar April 29, 2016Johannes Streffer - Alzforum webinar April 29, 2016
Johannes Streffer - Alzforum webinar April 29, 2016
 
Byron Caughey
Byron CaugheyByron Caughey
Byron Caughey
 
Dominic Walsh - A Critical Appraisal of the Pathogenic Protein Spread Hypothe...
Dominic Walsh - A Critical Appraisal of the Pathogenic Protein Spread Hypothe...Dominic Walsh - A Critical Appraisal of the Pathogenic Protein Spread Hypothe...
Dominic Walsh - A Critical Appraisal of the Pathogenic Protein Spread Hypothe...
 
David Harris -
David Harris - David Harris -
David Harris -
 
Patrik Brundin - Are Synucleinopathies Prion Diseases?
Patrik Brundin - Are Synucleinopathies Prion Diseases?Patrik Brundin - Are Synucleinopathies Prion Diseases?
Patrik Brundin - Are Synucleinopathies Prion Diseases?
 
Virginia Lee - Cell-to-Cell Spread of Pathological Tau
Virginia Lee - Cell-to-Cell Spread of Pathological TauVirginia Lee - Cell-to-Cell Spread of Pathological Tau
Virginia Lee - Cell-to-Cell Spread of Pathological Tau
 
The cellular phase of Alzheimer's disease
The cellular phase of Alzheimer's diseaseThe cellular phase of Alzheimer's disease
The cellular phase of Alzheimer's disease
 
Hendrix 2015 composite endpoints redacted
Hendrix 2015 composite endpoints redacted Hendrix 2015 composite endpoints redacted
Hendrix 2015 composite endpoints redacted
 
Cliff Brangwynne
Cliff BrangwynneCliff Brangwynne
Cliff Brangwynne
 
Paul Taylor
Paul Taylor Paul Taylor
Paul Taylor
 

Logovinsky Alzforum Feb 28 2013 final

  • 1. Creating A New Clinical Assessment Tool for Trials in Early Alzheimer’s Disease Veronika Logovinsky, MD, PhD Eisai Inc. © 2012 Eisai Inc.
  • 2. Background and Objectives • Convergent efforts within Alzheimer’s disease (AD) field to treat early stages of disease • Disease modification treatments need to be studied in Early AD populations • Early AD population: disease continuum from MCI to mild Alzheimer’s dementia • Widely recognized by the AD community that no standard clinical endpoints exist that are sensitive to disease progression and treatment effect in Early AD • Significant burden for conducting trials in Early AD (particularly MCI) → long and large trials, difficult to impossible to manage 2 Eisai Confidential
  • 3. Development of New Composite Measure at Eisai • Assumptions – Certain items in existing clinical scales are sensitive for early disease stages – Can develop and optimize new assessment by selecting and combining these items • Approach – Develop a statistical model to analyze placebo data across multiple MCI studies over 1 year – Determine most sensitive combination of items from existing clinical tools (ADAS-Cog, MMSE, CDR-SB, NTB, …)  the new clinical measure – Assess behavior of the new tool across multiple mild Alzheimer’s dementia studies – Assess sensitivity of the new tool to treatment effects in MCI and mild Alzheimer’s dementia 3 Eisai Confidential
  • 4. Final Composite: Items and Their Relative Contributions % of Maximum % of Observed Composite Possible Composite Maximum Observed Delayed Word Recall 10 4% 10 6% • ADAS-cog items contribute ~22% Orientation 8 7% 7 9% ADAS (vs. ~17% Word Recognition 12 2% 12 3% possible) Word Finding Difficulty 5 4% 4 4% • MMSE items contribute ~18% MMSE Orientation to Time 5 11% 5 15% (vs. ~13% Constructional Praxis 1 2% 1 3% possible) Personal Care 3 8% 1 4% • CDR-sb items Community Affairs 3 17% 2 15% contribute ~61% (vs. ~71% Home and Hobbies 3 14% 2 13% possible) CDR Judgment and Problem 3 11% 2 10% Solving Memory 3 9% 2 8% Orientation 3 12% 2 11% 4 Eisai Confidential
  • 5. New Composite Has Been Extensively Tested and Validated with Retrospective Data • Split sample validation and reliability • Responsiveness to change with disease progression – Compare Mean to Standard Deviation Ratio (MSDR) between the composite and standard scales • MCI population • Enriched MCI subgroups (CSF Aβ positive and ApoE4 positive) • Mild Alzheimer’s dementia patient population combining placebo data from 3 studies • Responsiveness to treatment effect – MCI population – Mild Alzheimer’s dementia 5 Eisai Confidential
  • 6. New Composite Improves Responsiveness/Sample Size Required Compared to Original Scales 7000 5000 Pooled 2000 MCI 6000 APOε4 Carrier Sample Size per arm 4000 MCI CSF 5000 Aβ(1-42) Pooled Mild AD 4000 3000 1000 3000 2000 2000 1000 1000 0 0 0 ADAS-cog Composite MMSE Composite CDR Composite Score Score Score
  • 7. Responsiveness to Treatment Effect: Difference of Donepezil Versus Placebo in Change from Baseline Study ADAS- Population Treatment† CDR-SB MMSE ADCOMS Study duration Cog Eisai donepezil MCI 12 mo 10 mg - - - - Study 1 Eisai donepezil 5 mg + - + + Mild AD 6 mo Study 3 10 mg + - - + 10 mg - - + + ADCS MCI 12 mo 2000 IU - - - - Vitamin E + indicates statistical significance at alpha=0.05; - indicated statistical significance was not reached † Treatment was donepezil unless otherwise indicated • Responsiveness to treatment effect is driven by ADAS-Cog and MMSE • CDR-SB alone is not responsive to treatment effect 7 Eisai Confidential
  • 8. Summary • Improved sensitivity to decline • Allows for substantially smaller sample sizes • Responsive to current treatments • Valid as a clinical outcome • Can be used as single primary outcome assessment for Early AD studies Eisai recently initiated large Phase 2 study with BAN2401 (monoclonal antibody directed against protofibrils) New composite is used as clinical outcome assessment in the study 8 Eisai Confidential
  • 9. Thanks! Eisai Inc. • Andrew Satlin • Jinping Wang • Carlos Perdomo • Shobha Dhadda • Ira Do • Martin Rabe Pentara • Suzanne B. Hendrix • Stephanie Stanworth 9 Eisai Confidential

Editor's Notes

  1. Composite score is a weighted sum of items using their PLS coefficients as the weights Addition of ADL or NTB items did not improve sensitivity of the combination
  2. CDR (vs. ADAS-Cog) tracks well with disease progression; Further improvement possible for MCI using enriched populations, such as ApoE ε4 carriers (reduced heterogeneity and increased progression)
  3. CDR-SB items may not be as reversible, therefore do not change due to treatment.