Más contenido relacionado
La actualidad más candente (20)
Similar a Torcthumbnail4 gettingtoyes-091014122718-phpapp01 (20)
Torcthumbnail4 gettingtoyes-091014122718-phpapp01
- 1. Torc Thumbnail # 4
Getting to YES
- Negotiating Agreement
Without Giving In
© Torc Consulting Group
- 2. Getting to YES: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In
Getting to YES: Negotiating Agreement
Without Giving In
by Roger Fisher, William Ury & Bruce Patton.
© Torc Consulting Group
- 3. Getting to YES: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In
According to Fisher & Ury any method of agreement
may be fairly judged by three criteria:
1.
2.
3.
It should produce a wise* agreement if agreement is
possible
It should be efficient
It should improve or at least not damage the relationship
between parties
*A wise agreement can be defined as one which meets the
legitimate interests of each side to the extent possible,
resolves conflicting interests fairly, is durable, and takes
community interests into account.
© Torc Consulting Group
- 4. Getting to YES: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In
Positional Bargaining – where each side
takes a position, argues for it and makes
concessions to reach a compromise – does
not produce agreements which meet the three
criteria.
© Torc Consulting Group
- 5. Getting to YES: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In
To support the case against positional bargaining
they state:
Arguing over positions produces unwise agreements
Arguing over positions is inefficient
Arguing over positions endangers an ongoing relationship
Where many parties are involved, positional bargaining
leads to more complex negotiations
Any negotiation primarily concerned with the relationship
runs the risk of producing a sloppy agreement.
© Torc Consulting Group
- 6. Getting to YES: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In
The Principled Negotiating Approach is
designed to address and meet the three
criteria and involves the following steps:
1.
2.
3.
4.
People – Separate the people from the problem
Interests – Focus on interests, not positions
Options – Generate a variety of possibilities
before deciding what to do
Criteria – Insist that the result be based on some
objective standard
© Torc Consulting Group
- 7. Getting to YES: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In
Principled Negotiating Approach
Separating the People from the Problem
Every person involved in dispute resolution has two
interests:
a)
b)
in the substance - our own interests in the problem
in interpersonal relationships
When relationships become entangled with the problem,
negotiations can fail or not produce a fair and robust
outcome.
© Torc Consulting Group
- 8. Getting to YES: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In
Principled Negotiating Approach
Separating the People from the Problem – contd.
The people side of negotiations can be addressed by:
Clarifying perceptions
Allowing emotions to be expressed
Maintaining clear communications
Separating people from the problem allows parties to deal
with the human aspect in parallel with addressing the
problem on its merits.
© Torc Consulting Group
- 9. Getting to YES: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In
Principled Negotiating Approach
Focus on Interests, Not Positions
Your position is something you have decided on, your
interests are what caused you to so decide.
It is important to build a picture of your own and of the
various interests of those other parties involved in the
negotiations.
Interests can be identified by asking Why? and Why
Not? as distinct from What?
© Torc Consulting Group
- 10. Getting to YES: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In
Principled Negotiating Approach
Focus on Interests, Not Positions cont/d
Establish the legitimacy of your interests and
demonstrate that you appreciate the other party
interests
Present your interests before outlining your proposals.
Don’t overlook basic human needs e.g. security,
economic wellbeing, a sense of belonging, recognition,
control over one’s life.
© Torc Consulting Group
- 11. Getting to YES: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In
Principled Negotiating Approach
Invent Options For Mutual Gain
In negotiations the four major obstacles that inhibit the
inventing of options are:
Premature judgement
Searching for a single answer
The assumption of a fixed pie
Thinking that ‘solving their problem is their problem’
© Torc Consulting Group
- 12. Getting to YES: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In
Principled Negotiating Approach
Invent Options For Mutual Gain
To generate creative options you need to:
Separate the act of inventing options from the
act of judging them
Try to broaden options
Search for mutual gains
Invent ways to make their decisions easy
© Torc Consulting Group
- 13. Getting to YES: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In
Principled Negotiating Approach
Insist on Using Objective Criteria
Develop objective criteria based on fair standards or
fair procedures.
Open the discussion on objective criteria by:
Framing each issue as a joint search for objective
criteria
Reason and be open to reason as to which
standards are most appropriate and how they
should be applied
Never yield to pressure, only to principle.
© Torc Consulting Group
- 14. Getting to YES: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In
On the question of pressure a refusal to yield
except in response to sound reasons is an easier
position to defend –publicly and privately –than is
a refusal to yield combined with a refusal to
advance sound reasons.
© Torc Consulting Group
- 15. Getting to YES: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In
What if they are more powerful?
Develop a BATNA – Best Alternative to a
Negotiated Agreement
In preparation for negotiations it is necessary to develop the
alternatives against which to measure a proposal against. Also
try to develop the other party’s BATNA.
Whether you should or should not agree on something in a
negotiation depends entirely on the attractiveness to you of
the best available alternative
The better your BATNA, the greater your power.
© Torc Consulting Group
- 16. Getting to YES: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In
What if the other side won’t play to the same rules
and insist on attacking your proposals and
maximising their gains?
Continue to concentrate on the merits rather than
positions
Rather than resisting their force, seek out and
discuss the principles underlying the other side’s
positions
Consider using a third party to mediate
© Torc Consulting Group
- 17. Getting to YES: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In
What if the other negotiator uses dirty tricks?
Recognise the tactic explicitly
Question the tactic, not their personal integrity
Insist on using objective criteria
As a last resort – turn to your BATNA and leave the
negotiations
© Torc Consulting Group
- 18. Getting to YES: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In
For further information, please contact:
Tony Roe
Torc Consulting Group
4 Lower Pembroke Street
Dublin 2
Ph : +353-1-6623020
tr@torc.ie
© Torc Consulting Group