SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 62
WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
JUSTIN T MOORE, A SOLUTION TO THE L-SPACE PROBLEM,
                  PREPRINT, 2005.


                       Erik A. Andrejko

         University of Wisconsin - Madison – SPECIALTY EXAM

                     November 29 2005




                ERIK A. ANDREJKO    WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
S AND L-SPACES



  A space is called hereditarily separable if every subspace has a
  countable dense subset.




                       ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
S AND L-SPACES



  A space is called hereditarily separable if every subspace has a
  countable dense subset.
  A space is called hereditarily Lindelöf if every cover of a subspace
  has a countable subcover.




                       ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
S AND L-SPACES



  A space is called hereditarily separable if every subspace has a
  countable dense subset.
  A space is called hereditarily Lindelöf if every cover of a subspace
  has a countable subcover.
  An S-space is a regular (T3 ) space that is hereditarily separable but
  not hereditarily Lindelöf.




                        ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
S AND L-SPACES



  A space is called hereditarily separable if every subspace has a
  countable dense subset.
  A space is called hereditarily Lindelöf if every cover of a subspace
  has a countable subcover.
  An S-space is a regular (T3 ) space that is hereditarily separable but
  not hereditarily Lindelöf.
  An L-space is a regular space that is hereditarily Lindelöf but not
  hereditarily separable.




                        ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
S AND L-SPACES



  A space is called hereditarily separable if every subspace has a
  countable dense subset.
  A space is called hereditarily Lindelöf if every cover of a subspace
  has a countable subcover.
  An S-space is a regular (T3 ) space that is hereditarily separable but
  not hereditarily Lindelöf.
  An L-space is a regular space that is hereditarily Lindelöf but not
  hereditarily separable.

  QUESTION
  (Juhász and Hajnal 1968) Do there exist S and L spaces?




                        ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
CANONICAL S AND L-SPACES

  A space X is called right-separated if it can be well ordered in type
  ω1 such that every initial segment is open.




                        ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
CANONICAL S AND L-SPACES

  A space X is called right-separated if it can be well ordered in type
  ω1 such that every initial segment is open.

                                                                        ...
                                                                      ...
                      FIGURE: A right-separated space




                        ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
CANONICAL S AND L-SPACES

  A space X is called right-separated if it can be well ordered in type
  ω1 such that every initial segment is open.

                                                                        ...
                                                                      ...
                      FIGURE: A right-separated space


  A space X is called left-separated if it can be well ordered in type ω1
  such that every initial segment is open.




                        ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
CANONICAL S AND L-SPACES

  A space X is called right-separated if it can be well ordered in type
  ω1 such that every initial segment is open.

                                                                        ...
                                                                      ...
                      FIGURE: A right-separated space


  A space X is called left-separated if it can be well ordered in type ω1
  such that every initial segment is open.

                                                                      ...

                      FIGURE: A left-separated space



                        ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
CANONICAL S AND L-SPACES




  THEOREM
  A space is hereditarily separable iff it has no uncountable left
  separated subspace.




                        ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
CANONICAL S AND L-SPACES




  THEOREM
  A space is hereditarily separable iff it has no uncountable left
  separated subspace.

  THEOREM
  A space is hereditarily Lindelöf iff it has no uncountable right
  separated subspace.




                        ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
CANONICAL S AND L-SPACES



  FACT
  A regular right separated space of type ω1 is an S-space iff it has no
  uncountable discrete subspace. A regular left separated space of type
  ω1 is an L-space iff it has no uncountable discrete subspaces.




                       ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
CANONICAL S AND L-SPACES



  FACT
  A regular right separated space of type ω1 is an S-space iff it has no
  uncountable discrete subspace. A regular left separated space of type
  ω1 is an L-space iff it has no uncountable discrete subspaces.
  By 2ω1 we denote the Tychanoff product space where 2 is the 2 point
  discrete space. This has basis elements [σ ] where σ is a finite
  function from ω1 to 2 and where

                        [σ ] = {f ∈ 2ω1 : f |dom(σ ) = σ }

  i.e., the functions which extend σ .




                         ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
CANONICAL S AND L-SPACES



  THEOREM
  Canonical Form
  (A) Every S-space contains an uncountable subset which under a
      possibly weaker topology is homeomorphic to a right separated
      S-subspace of 2ω1 .




                       ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
CANONICAL S AND L-SPACES



  THEOREM
  Canonical Form
  (A) Every S-space contains an uncountable subset which under a
      possibly weaker topology is homeomorphic to a right separated
      S-subspace of 2ω1 .
  (B) Assume ¬CH. Every L-space contains a subset which under a
      possibly weaker topology is homeomorphic to a left separated
      L-subspace of 2ω1 .




                       ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
CANONICAL S AND L-SPACES



  THEOREM
  Canonical Form
  (A) Every S-space contains an uncountable subset which under a
      possibly weaker topology is homeomorphic to a right separated
      S-subspace of 2ω1 .
  (B) Assume ¬CH. Every L-space contains a subset which under a
      possibly weaker topology is homeomorphic to a left separated
      L-subspace of 2ω1 .

  Thus S and L-spaces, when they exist, exist as subspaces of 2ω1 .




                       ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
BUILDING S AND L-SPACES




               ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
BUILDING S AND L-SPACES



  THEOREM (KUREPA)
  A Suslin line is an L-space.




                        ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
BUILDING S AND L-SPACES



  THEOREM (KUREPA)
  A Suslin line is an L-space.

  THEOREM (RUDIN)
  If there is a Suslin line there is an S-space.




                         ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
BUILDING S AND L-SPACES



  THEOREM (KUREPA)
  A Suslin line is an L-space.

  THEOREM (RUDIN)
  If there is a Suslin line there is an S-space.




                         ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
BUILDING S AND L-SPACES



  THEOREM (KUREPA)
  A Suslin line is an L-space.

  THEOREM (RUDIN)
  If there is a Suslin line there is an S-space.

  THEOREM
  (CH) There exists S and L-spaces.




                         ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
DESTROYING S AND L-SPACES


  A strong S-space is a space X such that for all n < ω X n is an
  S-space.




                       ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
DESTROYING S AND L-SPACES


  A strong S-space is a space X such that for all n < ω X n is an
  S-space.
  A strong L-space is a space X such that for all n < ω X n is an
  L-space.




                       ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
DESTROYING S AND L-SPACES


  A strong S-space is a space X such that for all n < ω X n is an
  S-space.
  A strong L-space is a space X such that for all n < ω X n is an
  L-space.

  THEOREM (ROITMAN)
  Adding a single Cohen real adds a strong S-space and strong L-space.




                       ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
DESTROYING S AND L-SPACES


  A strong S-space is a space X such that for all n < ω X n is an
  S-space.
  A strong L-space is a space X such that for all n < ω X n is an
  L-space.

  THEOREM (ROITMAN)
  Adding a single Cohen real adds a strong S-space and strong L-space.

  Under MA + ¬ CH a space is strongly hereditarily Lindelöf iff it is
  strongly hereditarily separable.




                        ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
DESTROYING S AND L-SPACES


  A strong S-space is a space X such that for all n < ω X n is an
  S-space.
  A strong L-space is a space X such that for all n < ω X n is an
  L-space.

  THEOREM (ROITMAN)
  Adding a single Cohen real adds a strong S-space and strong L-space.

  Under MA + ¬ CH a space is strongly hereditarily Lindelöf iff it is
  strongly hereditarily separable.

  THEOREM (KUNEN)
  (MA + ¬ CH) There are no strong S or L-spaces.




                        ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
A CONJECTURE




               ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
A CONJECTURE




                   ˇ´
  THEOREM (TODORCE VI C)
  (PFA) There are no S-spaces




                     ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
A CONJECTURE




                   ˇ´
  THEOREM (TODORCE VI C)
  (PFA) There are no S-spaces

  CONJECTURE
  (PFA) There are no L-spaces.




                      ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
PARTITIONS


  The existence of S and L-spaces are equivalent to the existence of
  certain colorings of [ω1 ]2 .




                       ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
PARTITIONS


  The existence of S and L-spaces are equivalent to the existence of
  certain colorings of [ω1 ]2 .

  THEOREM (ROITMAN)
  There does not exist an L-space iff for every partition

                                  [ω1 ]2 = K0 ∪ K1

  there is an increasing (separated) sequence {aξ : ξ < ω1 } of n
  elements subsets of ω1 and a k < n such that for all ξ < η either
   (I) There is an i > k such that {aξ i , aηk } ∈ K1 ,
  (II) or for some i ≤ k {aξ i , aηk } ∈ K1 iff {aξ i , aξ k } ∈ K0




                           ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
UPPER TRACE

  Let Cδ ⊆ δ be unbounded in δ of order type ω for each δ < ω1 . The
  sequence Cδ : δ < ω1 is called a ladder system which allows on to
  quot;walkquot; from β to α.




                      ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
UPPER TRACE

  Let Cδ ⊆ δ be unbounded in δ of order type ω for each δ < ω1 . The
  sequence Cδ : δ < ω1 is called a ladder system which allows on to
  quot;walkquot; from β to α.
  Define the upper trace Tr(α, β )


                  Tr(α, α) = 0,
                             /
                  Tr(α, β ) = Tr(α, min(Cβ  α)) ∪ {β }




                      ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
UPPER TRACE
  Let Cδ ⊆ δ be unbounded in δ of order type ω for each δ < ω1 . The
  sequence Cδ : δ < ω1 is called a ladder system which allows on to
  quot;walkquot; from β to α.
  Define the upper trace Tr(α, β )


                  Tr(α, α) = 0,
                             /
                  Tr(α, β ) = Tr(α, min(Cβ  α)) ∪ {β }




    ...                                                             ...



                             FIGURE: Tr(α, β )


                      ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
UPPER TRACE
  Let Cδ ⊆ δ be unbounded in δ of order type ω for each δ < ω1 . The
  sequence Cδ : δ < ω1 is called a ladder system which allows on to
  quot;walkquot; from β to α.
  Define the upper trace Tr(α, β )


                  Tr(α, α) = 0,
                             /
                  Tr(α, β ) = Tr(α, min(Cβ  α)) ∪ {β }




    ...                                                             ...



                             FIGURE: Tr(α, β )


                      ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
UPPER TRACE
  Let Cδ ⊆ δ be unbounded in δ of order type ω for each δ < ω1 . The
  sequence Cδ : δ < ω1 is called a ladder system which allows on to
  quot;walkquot; from β to α.
  Define the upper trace Tr(α, β )


                  Tr(α, α) = 0,
                             /
                  Tr(α, β ) = Tr(α, min(Cβ  α)) ∪ {β }




                                                                    ...
    ...                                                                   ...



                             FIGURE: Tr(α, β )


                      ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
UPPER TRACE
  Let Cδ ⊆ δ be unbounded in δ of order type ω for each δ < ω1 . The
  sequence Cδ : δ < ω1 is called a ladder system which allows on to
  quot;walkquot; from β to α.
  Define the upper trace Tr(α, β )


                  Tr(α, α) = 0,
                             /
                  Tr(α, β ) = Tr(α, min(Cβ  α)) ∪ {β }




                                         ...                        ...
    ...                                                                   ...



                             FIGURE: Tr(α, β )


                      ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
UPPER TRACE
  Let Cδ ⊆ δ be unbounded in δ of order type ω for each δ < ω1 . The
  sequence Cδ : δ < ω1 is called a ladder system which allows on to
  quot;walkquot; from β to α.
  Define the upper trace Tr(α, β )


                  Tr(α, α) = 0,
                             /
                  Tr(α, β ) = Tr(α, min(Cβ  α)) ∪ {β }




                                         ...                        ...
    ...                                                                   ...
                             ...



                             FIGURE: Tr(α, β )


                      ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
UPPER TRACE
  Let Cδ ⊆ δ be unbounded in δ of order type ω for each δ < ω1 . The
  sequence Cδ : δ < ω1 is called a ladder system which allows on to
  quot;walkquot; from β to α.
  Define the upper trace Tr(α, β )


                  Tr(α, α) = 0,
                             /
                  Tr(α, β ) = Tr(α, min(Cβ  α)) ∪ {β }




                                         ...                        ...
    ...                                                                   ...
                             ...



                             FIGURE: Tr(α, β )


                      ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
LOWER TRACE



  Define the lower trace L(α, β ) by


     L(α, α) = 0,
               /
     L(α, β ) = L(α, min(Cβ  α)) ∪ {max(Cβ ∩ α)}  max(Cβ ∩ α)




                      ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
LOWER TRACE

  Define the lower trace L(α, β ) by


     L(α, α) = 0,
               /
     L(α, β ) = L(α, min(Cβ  α)) ∪ {max(Cβ ∩ α)}  max(Cβ ∩ α)




    ...                                                             ...



                             FIGURE: L(α, β )




                      ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
LOWER TRACE

  Define the lower trace L(α, β ) by


     L(α, α) = 0,
               /
     L(α, β ) = L(α, min(Cβ  α)) ∪ {max(Cβ ∩ α)}  max(Cβ ∩ α)




    ...                                                             ...



                             FIGURE: L(α, β )




                      ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
LOWER TRACE

  Define the lower trace L(α, β ) by


     L(α, α) = 0,
               /
     L(α, β ) = L(α, min(Cβ  α)) ∪ {max(Cβ ∩ α)}  max(Cβ ∩ α)




                                                                    ...
    ...                                                                   ...



                             FIGURE: L(α, β )




                      ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
LOWER TRACE

  Define the lower trace L(α, β ) by


     L(α, α) = 0,
               /
     L(α, β ) = L(α, min(Cβ  α)) ∪ {max(Cβ ∩ α)}  max(Cβ ∩ α)




                                         ...                        ...
    ...                                                                   ...
          0



                             FIGURE: L(α, β )




                      ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
LOWER TRACE

  Define the lower trace L(α, β ) by


     L(α, α) = 0,
               /
     L(α, β ) = L(α, min(Cβ  α)) ∪ {max(Cβ ∩ α)}  max(Cβ ∩ α)




                                         ...                        ...
    ...                                                                   ...
                             ...
          01



                             FIGURE: L(α, β )




                      ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
LOWER TRACE

  Define the lower trace L(α, β ) by


     L(α, α) = 0,
               /
     L(α, β ) = L(α, min(Cβ  α)) ∪ {max(Cβ ∩ α)}  max(Cβ ∩ α)




                                         ...                        ...
    ...                                                                   ...
                             ...
          01
            2


                             FIGURE: L(α, β )




                      ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
COHERENT SEQUENCES


  If eβ : β < ω1 is a sequence of finite to one functions such that
  eβ → ω for all β < ω1 then it is a coherent sequence if whenever
  β ≤ β eβ β differs from eβ on a finite set.




                      ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
COHERENT SEQUENCES


  If eβ : β < ω1 is a sequence of finite to one functions such that
  eβ → ω for all β < ω1 then it is a coherent sequence if whenever
  β ≤ β eβ β differs from eβ on a finite set.
  For α ≤ β define ρ1 (α, β ):

                                         max |Cξ ∩ α|
                      ρ1 (α, β ) =
                                     ξ ∈Tr(α,β )




                      ERIK A. ANDREJKO    WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
COHERENT SEQUENCES


  If eβ : β < ω1 is a sequence of finite to one functions such that
  eβ → ω for all β < ω1 then it is a coherent sequence if whenever
  β ≤ β eβ β differs from eβ on a finite set.
  For α ≤ β define ρ1 (α, β ):

                                          max |Cξ ∩ α|
                       ρ1 (α, β ) =
                                      ξ ∈Tr(α,β )

  Define eβ (α) = ρ1 (α, β ).




                       ERIK A. ANDREJKO    WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
COHERENT SEQUENCES


  If eβ : β < ω1 is a sequence of finite to one functions such that
  eβ → ω for all β < ω1 then it is a coherent sequence if whenever
  β ≤ β eβ β differs from eβ on a finite set.
  For α ≤ β define ρ1 (α, β ):

                                          max |Cξ ∩ α|
                       ρ1 (α, β ) =
                                      ξ ∈Tr(α,β )

  Define eβ (α) = ρ1 (α, β ).

  FACT
  The sequence eβ : β < ω1 is a coherent sequence.




                       ERIK A. ANDREJKO    WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
OSCILLATIONS




  For finite functions s and t defined on a common set F let Osc(s, t; F )
  be the set of all ξ ∈ F  {min(F )} such that s(ξ − ) ≤ t(ξ − ) and
  s(ξ ) > t(ξ ) where ξ − is greatest element of F less than ξ .




                       ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
OSCILLATIONS




  For finite functions s and t defined on a common set F let Osc(s, t; F )
  be the set of all ξ ∈ F  {min(F )} such that s(ξ − ) ≤ t(ξ − ) and
  s(ξ ) > t(ξ ) where ξ − is greatest element of F less than ξ .
  Define osc(α, β ) by:

                    osc(α, β ) = | Osc(α, β ; L(α, β ))|




                       ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
OSCILLATIONS




  THEOREM (MOORE)
  For any A ⊆ [ω1 ]k and B ⊆ [ω1 ]l which are pairwise disjoint and
  uncountable and every n < ω there exist a ∈ A and {bm }m<n ⊆ B with
  a < bm and for all i < k, j < l and m < n

                 osc(a(i), bm (j)) = osc(a(i), b0 (j)) + m




                       ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
THE MAIN RESULT




  THEOREM (MOORE)
  There exists a function o∗ : ω1 → ω such that if A ⊆ [ω1 ]k and
                                2

  B ⊆ [ω1 ] are pairwise disjoint and uncountable and χ : k → ω is any
            l

  function then there exist a ∈ A and b ∈ B with a < b and

                         o∗ (a(i), b(φ (i))) = χ(i)

  for any φ : k → l.




                       ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
THE MAIN RESULT CONT...




  COROLLARY
  There exists an L-space.




                       ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
THE MAIN RESULT CONT...




  COROLLARY
  There exists an L-space.

  COROLLARY
  There exists a weak HFC.




                       ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
OPEN QUESTIONS




                 ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
OPEN QUESTIONS




  QUESTION
  Does there exist an L-space whose square is an L-space?




                      ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
OPEN QUESTIONS




  QUESTION
  Does there exist an L-space whose square is an L-space?

  QUESTION
  Does there exist an HFCk space?
                         w




                      ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
OPEN QUESTIONS




  QUESTION
  Does there exist an L-space whose square is an L-space?

  QUESTION
  Does there exist an HFCk space?
                         w


  QUESTION
  Does there exist an L-space that is not a weak HFC?




                      ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
REFERENCES




             ERIK A. ANDREJKO   WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE

More Related Content

More from andrejko

Killing S Spaces
Killing S SpacesKilling S Spaces
Killing S Spacesandrejko
 
Decidability
DecidabilityDecidability
Decidabilityandrejko
 
Completeness
CompletenessCompleteness
Completenessandrejko
 
Compactness
CompactnessCompactness
Compactnessandrejko
 
Ordinal Cardinals
Ordinal CardinalsOrdinal Cardinals
Ordinal Cardinalsandrejko
 
The relative consistency of the negation of the Axiom of Choice using permuta...
The relative consistency of the negation of the Axiom of Choice using permuta...The relative consistency of the negation of the Axiom of Choice using permuta...
The relative consistency of the negation of the Axiom of Choice using permuta...andrejko
 
Ccc Indestructible S Spaces
Ccc Indestructible S SpacesCcc Indestructible S Spaces
Ccc Indestructible S Spacesandrejko
 

More from andrejko (8)

Killing S Spaces
Killing S SpacesKilling S Spaces
Killing S Spaces
 
Decidability
DecidabilityDecidability
Decidability
 
Completeness
CompletenessCompleteness
Completeness
 
Compactness
CompactnessCompactness
Compactness
 
ZF
ZFZF
ZF
 
Ordinal Cardinals
Ordinal CardinalsOrdinal Cardinals
Ordinal Cardinals
 
The relative consistency of the negation of the Axiom of Choice using permuta...
The relative consistency of the negation of the Axiom of Choice using permuta...The relative consistency of the negation of the Axiom of Choice using permuta...
The relative consistency of the negation of the Axiom of Choice using permuta...
 
Ccc Indestructible S Spaces
Ccc Indestructible S SpacesCcc Indestructible S Spaces
Ccc Indestructible S Spaces
 

Recently uploaded

TrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data Discovery
TrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data DiscoveryTrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data Discovery
TrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data DiscoveryTrustArc
 
Strategies for Landing an Oracle DBA Job as a Fresher
Strategies for Landing an Oracle DBA Job as a FresherStrategies for Landing an Oracle DBA Job as a Fresher
Strategies for Landing an Oracle DBA Job as a FresherRemote DBA Services
 
Web Form Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apri...
Web Form Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apri...Web Form Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apri...
Web Form Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apri...Jeffrey Haguewood
 
2024: Domino Containers - The Next Step. News from the Domino Container commu...
2024: Domino Containers - The Next Step. News from the Domino Container commu...2024: Domino Containers - The Next Step. News from the Domino Container commu...
2024: Domino Containers - The Next Step. News from the Domino Container commu...Martijn de Jong
 
Repurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost Saving
Repurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost SavingRepurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost Saving
Repurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost SavingEdi Saputra
 
Real Time Object Detection Using Open CV
Real Time Object Detection Using Open CVReal Time Object Detection Using Open CV
Real Time Object Detection Using Open CVKhem
 
"I see eyes in my soup": How Delivery Hero implemented the safety system for ...
"I see eyes in my soup": How Delivery Hero implemented the safety system for ..."I see eyes in my soup": How Delivery Hero implemented the safety system for ...
"I see eyes in my soup": How Delivery Hero implemented the safety system for ...Zilliz
 
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...apidays
 
Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...
Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...
Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...Miguel Araújo
 
ICT role in 21st century education and its challenges
ICT role in 21st century education and its challengesICT role in 21st century education and its challenges
ICT role in 21st century education and its challengesrafiqahmad00786416
 
Axa Assurance Maroc - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Axa Assurance Maroc - Insurer Innovation Award 2024Axa Assurance Maroc - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Axa Assurance Maroc - Insurer Innovation Award 2024The Digital Insurer
 
Apidays New York 2024 - Accelerating FinTech Innovation by Vasa Krishnan, Fin...
Apidays New York 2024 - Accelerating FinTech Innovation by Vasa Krishnan, Fin...Apidays New York 2024 - Accelerating FinTech Innovation by Vasa Krishnan, Fin...
Apidays New York 2024 - Accelerating FinTech Innovation by Vasa Krishnan, Fin...apidays
 
GenAI Risks & Security Meetup 01052024.pdf
GenAI Risks & Security Meetup 01052024.pdfGenAI Risks & Security Meetup 01052024.pdf
GenAI Risks & Security Meetup 01052024.pdflior mazor
 
Strategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot Takeoff
Strategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot TakeoffStrategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot Takeoff
Strategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot Takeoffsammart93
 
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Modernizing Securities Finance by Madhu Subbu
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Modernizing Securities Finance by Madhu SubbuApidays Singapore 2024 - Modernizing Securities Finance by Madhu Subbu
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Modernizing Securities Finance by Madhu Subbuapidays
 
Connector Corner: Accelerate revenue generation using UiPath API-centric busi...
Connector Corner: Accelerate revenue generation using UiPath API-centric busi...Connector Corner: Accelerate revenue generation using UiPath API-centric busi...
Connector Corner: Accelerate revenue generation using UiPath API-centric busi...DianaGray10
 
Why Teams call analytics are critical to your entire business
Why Teams call analytics are critical to your entire businessWhy Teams call analytics are critical to your entire business
Why Teams call analytics are critical to your entire businesspanagenda
 
Apidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, Adobe
Apidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, AdobeApidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, Adobe
Apidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, Adobeapidays
 
A Beginners Guide to Building a RAG App Using Open Source Milvus
A Beginners Guide to Building a RAG App Using Open Source MilvusA Beginners Guide to Building a RAG App Using Open Source Milvus
A Beginners Guide to Building a RAG App Using Open Source MilvusZilliz
 
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processors
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone ProcessorsExploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processors
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processorsdebabhi2
 

Recently uploaded (20)

TrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data Discovery
TrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data DiscoveryTrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data Discovery
TrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data Discovery
 
Strategies for Landing an Oracle DBA Job as a Fresher
Strategies for Landing an Oracle DBA Job as a FresherStrategies for Landing an Oracle DBA Job as a Fresher
Strategies for Landing an Oracle DBA Job as a Fresher
 
Web Form Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apri...
Web Form Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apri...Web Form Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apri...
Web Form Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apri...
 
2024: Domino Containers - The Next Step. News from the Domino Container commu...
2024: Domino Containers - The Next Step. News from the Domino Container commu...2024: Domino Containers - The Next Step. News from the Domino Container commu...
2024: Domino Containers - The Next Step. News from the Domino Container commu...
 
Repurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost Saving
Repurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost SavingRepurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost Saving
Repurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost Saving
 
Real Time Object Detection Using Open CV
Real Time Object Detection Using Open CVReal Time Object Detection Using Open CV
Real Time Object Detection Using Open CV
 
"I see eyes in my soup": How Delivery Hero implemented the safety system for ...
"I see eyes in my soup": How Delivery Hero implemented the safety system for ..."I see eyes in my soup": How Delivery Hero implemented the safety system for ...
"I see eyes in my soup": How Delivery Hero implemented the safety system for ...
 
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...
 
Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...
Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...
Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...
 
ICT role in 21st century education and its challenges
ICT role in 21st century education and its challengesICT role in 21st century education and its challenges
ICT role in 21st century education and its challenges
 
Axa Assurance Maroc - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Axa Assurance Maroc - Insurer Innovation Award 2024Axa Assurance Maroc - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Axa Assurance Maroc - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
 
Apidays New York 2024 - Accelerating FinTech Innovation by Vasa Krishnan, Fin...
Apidays New York 2024 - Accelerating FinTech Innovation by Vasa Krishnan, Fin...Apidays New York 2024 - Accelerating FinTech Innovation by Vasa Krishnan, Fin...
Apidays New York 2024 - Accelerating FinTech Innovation by Vasa Krishnan, Fin...
 
GenAI Risks & Security Meetup 01052024.pdf
GenAI Risks & Security Meetup 01052024.pdfGenAI Risks & Security Meetup 01052024.pdf
GenAI Risks & Security Meetup 01052024.pdf
 
Strategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot Takeoff
Strategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot TakeoffStrategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot Takeoff
Strategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot Takeoff
 
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Modernizing Securities Finance by Madhu Subbu
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Modernizing Securities Finance by Madhu SubbuApidays Singapore 2024 - Modernizing Securities Finance by Madhu Subbu
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Modernizing Securities Finance by Madhu Subbu
 
Connector Corner: Accelerate revenue generation using UiPath API-centric busi...
Connector Corner: Accelerate revenue generation using UiPath API-centric busi...Connector Corner: Accelerate revenue generation using UiPath API-centric busi...
Connector Corner: Accelerate revenue generation using UiPath API-centric busi...
 
Why Teams call analytics are critical to your entire business
Why Teams call analytics are critical to your entire businessWhy Teams call analytics are critical to your entire business
Why Teams call analytics are critical to your entire business
 
Apidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, Adobe
Apidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, AdobeApidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, Adobe
Apidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, Adobe
 
A Beginners Guide to Building a RAG App Using Open Source Milvus
A Beginners Guide to Building a RAG App Using Open Source MilvusA Beginners Guide to Building a RAG App Using Open Source Milvus
A Beginners Guide to Building a RAG App Using Open Source Milvus
 
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processors
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone ProcessorsExploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processors
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processors
 

L Space In ZFC

  • 1. WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE JUSTIN T MOORE, A SOLUTION TO THE L-SPACE PROBLEM, PREPRINT, 2005. Erik A. Andrejko University of Wisconsin - Madison – SPECIALTY EXAM November 29 2005 ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 2. S AND L-SPACES A space is called hereditarily separable if every subspace has a countable dense subset. ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 3. S AND L-SPACES A space is called hereditarily separable if every subspace has a countable dense subset. A space is called hereditarily Lindelöf if every cover of a subspace has a countable subcover. ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 4. S AND L-SPACES A space is called hereditarily separable if every subspace has a countable dense subset. A space is called hereditarily Lindelöf if every cover of a subspace has a countable subcover. An S-space is a regular (T3 ) space that is hereditarily separable but not hereditarily Lindelöf. ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 5. S AND L-SPACES A space is called hereditarily separable if every subspace has a countable dense subset. A space is called hereditarily Lindelöf if every cover of a subspace has a countable subcover. An S-space is a regular (T3 ) space that is hereditarily separable but not hereditarily Lindelöf. An L-space is a regular space that is hereditarily Lindelöf but not hereditarily separable. ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 6. S AND L-SPACES A space is called hereditarily separable if every subspace has a countable dense subset. A space is called hereditarily Lindelöf if every cover of a subspace has a countable subcover. An S-space is a regular (T3 ) space that is hereditarily separable but not hereditarily Lindelöf. An L-space is a regular space that is hereditarily Lindelöf but not hereditarily separable. QUESTION (Juhász and Hajnal 1968) Do there exist S and L spaces? ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 7. CANONICAL S AND L-SPACES A space X is called right-separated if it can be well ordered in type ω1 such that every initial segment is open. ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 8. CANONICAL S AND L-SPACES A space X is called right-separated if it can be well ordered in type ω1 such that every initial segment is open. ... ... FIGURE: A right-separated space ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 9. CANONICAL S AND L-SPACES A space X is called right-separated if it can be well ordered in type ω1 such that every initial segment is open. ... ... FIGURE: A right-separated space A space X is called left-separated if it can be well ordered in type ω1 such that every initial segment is open. ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 10. CANONICAL S AND L-SPACES A space X is called right-separated if it can be well ordered in type ω1 such that every initial segment is open. ... ... FIGURE: A right-separated space A space X is called left-separated if it can be well ordered in type ω1 such that every initial segment is open. ... FIGURE: A left-separated space ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 11. CANONICAL S AND L-SPACES THEOREM A space is hereditarily separable iff it has no uncountable left separated subspace. ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 12. CANONICAL S AND L-SPACES THEOREM A space is hereditarily separable iff it has no uncountable left separated subspace. THEOREM A space is hereditarily Lindelöf iff it has no uncountable right separated subspace. ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 13. CANONICAL S AND L-SPACES FACT A regular right separated space of type ω1 is an S-space iff it has no uncountable discrete subspace. A regular left separated space of type ω1 is an L-space iff it has no uncountable discrete subspaces. ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 14. CANONICAL S AND L-SPACES FACT A regular right separated space of type ω1 is an S-space iff it has no uncountable discrete subspace. A regular left separated space of type ω1 is an L-space iff it has no uncountable discrete subspaces. By 2ω1 we denote the Tychanoff product space where 2 is the 2 point discrete space. This has basis elements [σ ] where σ is a finite function from ω1 to 2 and where [σ ] = {f ∈ 2ω1 : f |dom(σ ) = σ } i.e., the functions which extend σ . ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 15. CANONICAL S AND L-SPACES THEOREM Canonical Form (A) Every S-space contains an uncountable subset which under a possibly weaker topology is homeomorphic to a right separated S-subspace of 2ω1 . ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 16. CANONICAL S AND L-SPACES THEOREM Canonical Form (A) Every S-space contains an uncountable subset which under a possibly weaker topology is homeomorphic to a right separated S-subspace of 2ω1 . (B) Assume ¬CH. Every L-space contains a subset which under a possibly weaker topology is homeomorphic to a left separated L-subspace of 2ω1 . ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 17. CANONICAL S AND L-SPACES THEOREM Canonical Form (A) Every S-space contains an uncountable subset which under a possibly weaker topology is homeomorphic to a right separated S-subspace of 2ω1 . (B) Assume ¬CH. Every L-space contains a subset which under a possibly weaker topology is homeomorphic to a left separated L-subspace of 2ω1 . Thus S and L-spaces, when they exist, exist as subspaces of 2ω1 . ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 18. BUILDING S AND L-SPACES ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 19. BUILDING S AND L-SPACES THEOREM (KUREPA) A Suslin line is an L-space. ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 20. BUILDING S AND L-SPACES THEOREM (KUREPA) A Suslin line is an L-space. THEOREM (RUDIN) If there is a Suslin line there is an S-space. ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 21. BUILDING S AND L-SPACES THEOREM (KUREPA) A Suslin line is an L-space. THEOREM (RUDIN) If there is a Suslin line there is an S-space. ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 22. BUILDING S AND L-SPACES THEOREM (KUREPA) A Suslin line is an L-space. THEOREM (RUDIN) If there is a Suslin line there is an S-space. THEOREM (CH) There exists S and L-spaces. ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 23. DESTROYING S AND L-SPACES A strong S-space is a space X such that for all n < ω X n is an S-space. ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 24. DESTROYING S AND L-SPACES A strong S-space is a space X such that for all n < ω X n is an S-space. A strong L-space is a space X such that for all n < ω X n is an L-space. ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 25. DESTROYING S AND L-SPACES A strong S-space is a space X such that for all n < ω X n is an S-space. A strong L-space is a space X such that for all n < ω X n is an L-space. THEOREM (ROITMAN) Adding a single Cohen real adds a strong S-space and strong L-space. ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 26. DESTROYING S AND L-SPACES A strong S-space is a space X such that for all n < ω X n is an S-space. A strong L-space is a space X such that for all n < ω X n is an L-space. THEOREM (ROITMAN) Adding a single Cohen real adds a strong S-space and strong L-space. Under MA + ¬ CH a space is strongly hereditarily Lindelöf iff it is strongly hereditarily separable. ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 27. DESTROYING S AND L-SPACES A strong S-space is a space X such that for all n < ω X n is an S-space. A strong L-space is a space X such that for all n < ω X n is an L-space. THEOREM (ROITMAN) Adding a single Cohen real adds a strong S-space and strong L-space. Under MA + ¬ CH a space is strongly hereditarily Lindelöf iff it is strongly hereditarily separable. THEOREM (KUNEN) (MA + ¬ CH) There are no strong S or L-spaces. ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 28. A CONJECTURE ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 29. A CONJECTURE ˇ´ THEOREM (TODORCE VI C) (PFA) There are no S-spaces ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 30. A CONJECTURE ˇ´ THEOREM (TODORCE VI C) (PFA) There are no S-spaces CONJECTURE (PFA) There are no L-spaces. ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 31. PARTITIONS The existence of S and L-spaces are equivalent to the existence of certain colorings of [ω1 ]2 . ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 32. PARTITIONS The existence of S and L-spaces are equivalent to the existence of certain colorings of [ω1 ]2 . THEOREM (ROITMAN) There does not exist an L-space iff for every partition [ω1 ]2 = K0 ∪ K1 there is an increasing (separated) sequence {aξ : ξ < ω1 } of n elements subsets of ω1 and a k < n such that for all ξ < η either (I) There is an i > k such that {aξ i , aηk } ∈ K1 , (II) or for some i ≤ k {aξ i , aηk } ∈ K1 iff {aξ i , aξ k } ∈ K0 ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 33. UPPER TRACE Let Cδ ⊆ δ be unbounded in δ of order type ω for each δ < ω1 . The sequence Cδ : δ < ω1 is called a ladder system which allows on to quot;walkquot; from β to α. ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 34. UPPER TRACE Let Cδ ⊆ δ be unbounded in δ of order type ω for each δ < ω1 . The sequence Cδ : δ < ω1 is called a ladder system which allows on to quot;walkquot; from β to α. Define the upper trace Tr(α, β ) Tr(α, α) = 0, / Tr(α, β ) = Tr(α, min(Cβ α)) ∪ {β } ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 35. UPPER TRACE Let Cδ ⊆ δ be unbounded in δ of order type ω for each δ < ω1 . The sequence Cδ : δ < ω1 is called a ladder system which allows on to quot;walkquot; from β to α. Define the upper trace Tr(α, β ) Tr(α, α) = 0, / Tr(α, β ) = Tr(α, min(Cβ α)) ∪ {β } ... ... FIGURE: Tr(α, β ) ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 36. UPPER TRACE Let Cδ ⊆ δ be unbounded in δ of order type ω for each δ < ω1 . The sequence Cδ : δ < ω1 is called a ladder system which allows on to quot;walkquot; from β to α. Define the upper trace Tr(α, β ) Tr(α, α) = 0, / Tr(α, β ) = Tr(α, min(Cβ α)) ∪ {β } ... ... FIGURE: Tr(α, β ) ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 37. UPPER TRACE Let Cδ ⊆ δ be unbounded in δ of order type ω for each δ < ω1 . The sequence Cδ : δ < ω1 is called a ladder system which allows on to quot;walkquot; from β to α. Define the upper trace Tr(α, β ) Tr(α, α) = 0, / Tr(α, β ) = Tr(α, min(Cβ α)) ∪ {β } ... ... ... FIGURE: Tr(α, β ) ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 38. UPPER TRACE Let Cδ ⊆ δ be unbounded in δ of order type ω for each δ < ω1 . The sequence Cδ : δ < ω1 is called a ladder system which allows on to quot;walkquot; from β to α. Define the upper trace Tr(α, β ) Tr(α, α) = 0, / Tr(α, β ) = Tr(α, min(Cβ α)) ∪ {β } ... ... ... ... FIGURE: Tr(α, β ) ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 39. UPPER TRACE Let Cδ ⊆ δ be unbounded in δ of order type ω for each δ < ω1 . The sequence Cδ : δ < ω1 is called a ladder system which allows on to quot;walkquot; from β to α. Define the upper trace Tr(α, β ) Tr(α, α) = 0, / Tr(α, β ) = Tr(α, min(Cβ α)) ∪ {β } ... ... ... ... ... FIGURE: Tr(α, β ) ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 40. UPPER TRACE Let Cδ ⊆ δ be unbounded in δ of order type ω for each δ < ω1 . The sequence Cδ : δ < ω1 is called a ladder system which allows on to quot;walkquot; from β to α. Define the upper trace Tr(α, β ) Tr(α, α) = 0, / Tr(α, β ) = Tr(α, min(Cβ α)) ∪ {β } ... ... ... ... ... FIGURE: Tr(α, β ) ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 41. LOWER TRACE Define the lower trace L(α, β ) by L(α, α) = 0, / L(α, β ) = L(α, min(Cβ α)) ∪ {max(Cβ ∩ α)} max(Cβ ∩ α) ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 42. LOWER TRACE Define the lower trace L(α, β ) by L(α, α) = 0, / L(α, β ) = L(α, min(Cβ α)) ∪ {max(Cβ ∩ α)} max(Cβ ∩ α) ... ... FIGURE: L(α, β ) ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 43. LOWER TRACE Define the lower trace L(α, β ) by L(α, α) = 0, / L(α, β ) = L(α, min(Cβ α)) ∪ {max(Cβ ∩ α)} max(Cβ ∩ α) ... ... FIGURE: L(α, β ) ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 44. LOWER TRACE Define the lower trace L(α, β ) by L(α, α) = 0, / L(α, β ) = L(α, min(Cβ α)) ∪ {max(Cβ ∩ α)} max(Cβ ∩ α) ... ... ... FIGURE: L(α, β ) ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 45. LOWER TRACE Define the lower trace L(α, β ) by L(α, α) = 0, / L(α, β ) = L(α, min(Cβ α)) ∪ {max(Cβ ∩ α)} max(Cβ ∩ α) ... ... ... ... 0 FIGURE: L(α, β ) ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 46. LOWER TRACE Define the lower trace L(α, β ) by L(α, α) = 0, / L(α, β ) = L(α, min(Cβ α)) ∪ {max(Cβ ∩ α)} max(Cβ ∩ α) ... ... ... ... ... 01 FIGURE: L(α, β ) ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 47. LOWER TRACE Define the lower trace L(α, β ) by L(α, α) = 0, / L(α, β ) = L(α, min(Cβ α)) ∪ {max(Cβ ∩ α)} max(Cβ ∩ α) ... ... ... ... ... 01 2 FIGURE: L(α, β ) ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 48. COHERENT SEQUENCES If eβ : β < ω1 is a sequence of finite to one functions such that eβ → ω for all β < ω1 then it is a coherent sequence if whenever β ≤ β eβ β differs from eβ on a finite set. ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 49. COHERENT SEQUENCES If eβ : β < ω1 is a sequence of finite to one functions such that eβ → ω for all β < ω1 then it is a coherent sequence if whenever β ≤ β eβ β differs from eβ on a finite set. For α ≤ β define ρ1 (α, β ): max |Cξ ∩ α| ρ1 (α, β ) = ξ ∈Tr(α,β ) ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 50. COHERENT SEQUENCES If eβ : β < ω1 is a sequence of finite to one functions such that eβ → ω for all β < ω1 then it is a coherent sequence if whenever β ≤ β eβ β differs from eβ on a finite set. For α ≤ β define ρ1 (α, β ): max |Cξ ∩ α| ρ1 (α, β ) = ξ ∈Tr(α,β ) Define eβ (α) = ρ1 (α, β ). ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 51. COHERENT SEQUENCES If eβ : β < ω1 is a sequence of finite to one functions such that eβ → ω for all β < ω1 then it is a coherent sequence if whenever β ≤ β eβ β differs from eβ on a finite set. For α ≤ β define ρ1 (α, β ): max |Cξ ∩ α| ρ1 (α, β ) = ξ ∈Tr(α,β ) Define eβ (α) = ρ1 (α, β ). FACT The sequence eβ : β < ω1 is a coherent sequence. ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 52. OSCILLATIONS For finite functions s and t defined on a common set F let Osc(s, t; F ) be the set of all ξ ∈ F {min(F )} such that s(ξ − ) ≤ t(ξ − ) and s(ξ ) > t(ξ ) where ξ − is greatest element of F less than ξ . ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 53. OSCILLATIONS For finite functions s and t defined on a common set F let Osc(s, t; F ) be the set of all ξ ∈ F {min(F )} such that s(ξ − ) ≤ t(ξ − ) and s(ξ ) > t(ξ ) where ξ − is greatest element of F less than ξ . Define osc(α, β ) by: osc(α, β ) = | Osc(α, β ; L(α, β ))| ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 54. OSCILLATIONS THEOREM (MOORE) For any A ⊆ [ω1 ]k and B ⊆ [ω1 ]l which are pairwise disjoint and uncountable and every n < ω there exist a ∈ A and {bm }m<n ⊆ B with a < bm and for all i < k, j < l and m < n osc(a(i), bm (j)) = osc(a(i), b0 (j)) + m ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 55. THE MAIN RESULT THEOREM (MOORE) There exists a function o∗ : ω1 → ω such that if A ⊆ [ω1 ]k and 2 B ⊆ [ω1 ] are pairwise disjoint and uncountable and χ : k → ω is any l function then there exist a ∈ A and b ∈ B with a < b and o∗ (a(i), b(φ (i))) = χ(i) for any φ : k → l. ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 56. THE MAIN RESULT CONT... COROLLARY There exists an L-space. ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 57. THE MAIN RESULT CONT... COROLLARY There exists an L-space. COROLLARY There exists a weak HFC. ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 58. OPEN QUESTIONS ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 59. OPEN QUESTIONS QUESTION Does there exist an L-space whose square is an L-space? ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 60. OPEN QUESTIONS QUESTION Does there exist an L-space whose square is an L-space? QUESTION Does there exist an HFCk space? w ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 61. OPEN QUESTIONS QUESTION Does there exist an L-space whose square is an L-space? QUESTION Does there exist an HFCk space? w QUESTION Does there exist an L-space that is not a weak HFC? ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE
  • 62. REFERENCES ERIK A. ANDREJKO WALKING UP TO AN L-SPACE