SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 14
OPERATION MANAGEMENT




SUBMITED TO:                    SUBMITED BY: GROUP 7
                                NITISH GOEL        (65)
DR. R.K SINGH                   SANTOSH GHILDIYAL (72)
                                ANKIT PHARTIYAL     (77)
                                LAISHRAM ARNOLD     (91)
                                DHEERAJ KUMAR       (118)
BENCHMARKING
 Process of improving performance by
  constantly identifying, understanding
  and adapting best practices and
  processes.
 Comparing one's organization or a part
  of it with that of the other companies.
TYPES OF BENCHMARKING
Benefits of Benchmarking
   Promotes a thorough understanding of company’s own
    process

   Saves time and money

   Identify non value added activities

   Focuses on performance measures and processes and
    not on products

   It provides a basis for training human resource
STAGES IN A BENCHMARKING
    Planning:
   Identifying, establishing and documenting specific study
    focus areas.
   The best-practice companies are identified and
    appropriate data collection tools are selected.
    Data collection:
   Information is mainly collected through questionnaires
    administered to all best practice companies.
    Data analysis & Report:
   Involves the critical evaluation of practices followed, and
    the identification of practices that help and deter superior
    performance.
    Adaptation
Benchmarking at Xerox
Benchmarking against Japanese: Xerox found that,
-They take twice as long as its Japanese competitors.
-Five times number of engineers.
- Four times the number of design change.
- Three times the design cost.


Company found that Japanese could produce, ship and sell units for about
the same amount that it cost Xerox to manufacture them.

Xerox’s products had over 30,000 defective parts per million—about 30
times more than its competitors.
Benchmarking Model at Xerox

• Planning: Determining the subject to be benchmarked, identify the relevant
 best practice and develop most appropriate data collection technique.

•Analysis: Assess the strengths of competitors and compare Xerox’s
 performance with competitors.

• Integration: Establish necessary goals and integrate these goals into the
  company’s formal planning processes.

• Action: Implement action plans established and assess them periodically to
  determine whether the company is achieving its objectives.

• Maturity: Determine whether the company has attained a superior
  performance level.
Supplier management system

     Japanese Companies
•It has 1000 suppliers
•They trained Vendor’s Employee in Quality Control , manufacturing automation.
•Just-in-time i.e. Delivery in small quantities, as per customer’s production Schedule.
       Xerox
• Reduced the vendors from 5000 to 400.
• Created a Vendor Certification Process in which suppliers were offered training &
  told their areas of improvement.
• Vendors were consulted for better Designs & Improved Customer service.
Inventory Management
   Inventory holding Time reduction
•Xerox asked Branch managers to match the Stocking Policy with Customer’s
installation Orders .
• As a result CCP ( Capital Cycle Period) was cut by 70% which leads to savings of
    $ 200 million.
• Minimize Inventory Carrying Cost was to delay the assembly of product into the
   final Configuration.
Manufacturing System
Managers were encouraged to identify its :
Internal Customers ( i.e. Assembly Line Workers) & External Customers ( i.e. End
users who load the papers) in order to meet their needs.

Marketing
Company sent 55,000 questionnaires to monthly to customers to measure customer
Satisfaction & record Competitor’s performance.
Those Competitors who have scored higher, Xerox benchmark itself against it.

Quality
As a part of “Leadership Through Quality” program, Xerox started providing its
customers( External & Internal) innovative products & services.
    Total Quality Management
Team consists of Senior managers & Consultants from McKinsey help to make
TQM.
Under which New three SBUs were introduced:
Enterprise Service Business
Office Copiers
Home Copiers
All these have autonomy in Engineering, marketing & pricing.
Reaping The Benefits
• Number of defects reduced by 78 per 100 machines.

• Service response time reduced by 27%.

• Inspection of incoming components reduced to below 5%.

• Defects in incoming parts reduced to 150ppm.

• Inventory costs reduced by two-thirds.

• Marketing productivity increased by one-third.

• Distribution productivity increased by 8-10%.
• Increased product reliability on account of 40% reduction in
  unscheduled maintenance.

• Errors in billing reduced from 8.3% to 3.5% percent.

• Became the leader in the high-volume copier-duplicator
  market segment.

• Country units improved sales from 152% to 328%.

• Xerox went to be only company to win three prestigious quality
awards- Malcolm Baldridge National award, Deming award ,and
European quality award .

• During 1990s, Xerox, along with companies like Ford, AT&T,
  IBM, Motorola created the International Benchmarking
  Clearinghouse (IBC) to promote Benchmarking and guide
   companies across the world in benchmarking efforts.
Xerox benchmarking

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente

Xerox corporation (A)
Xerox corporation (A)Xerox corporation (A)
Xerox corporation (A)
Parth Purohit
 
Vermont teddy bear case
Vermont teddy bear caseVermont teddy bear case
Vermont teddy bear case
6592vivek
 
AT&T: Twenty Years of Change Case Analysis
AT&T: Twenty Years of Change Case AnalysisAT&T: Twenty Years of Change Case Analysis
AT&T: Twenty Years of Change Case Analysis
Motaz Agamawi
 
Caesars LEAN Operations_FINAL_v3
Caesars LEAN Operations_FINAL_v3Caesars LEAN Operations_FINAL_v3
Caesars LEAN Operations_FINAL_v3
Natalia Loyola
 
Som case study - dont bother me i cant cope
Som   case study - dont bother me i cant copeSom   case study - dont bother me i cant cope
Som case study - dont bother me i cant cope
Rajendra Inani
 

La actualidad más candente (20)

pfofile of wipro
pfofile of wipropfofile of wipro
pfofile of wipro
 
Case Study on Caterpillar Inc. (CAT)
Case Study on Caterpillar Inc. (CAT)Case Study on Caterpillar Inc. (CAT)
Case Study on Caterpillar Inc. (CAT)
 
Xerox corporation (A)
Xerox corporation (A)Xerox corporation (A)
Xerox corporation (A)
 
Hp case study
Hp case studyHp case study
Hp case study
 
Havells acquisition and turnaround of Sylvania - A comprehensive analysis
Havells acquisition and turnaround of Sylvania - A comprehensive analysisHavells acquisition and turnaround of Sylvania - A comprehensive analysis
Havells acquisition and turnaround of Sylvania - A comprehensive analysis
 
Cisco Case Analysis
Cisco Case AnalysisCisco Case Analysis
Cisco Case Analysis
 
Vermont teddy bear case
Vermont teddy bear caseVermont teddy bear case
Vermont teddy bear case
 
AT&T: Twenty Years of Change Case Analysis
AT&T: Twenty Years of Change Case AnalysisAT&T: Twenty Years of Change Case Analysis
AT&T: Twenty Years of Change Case Analysis
 
Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2010
Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2010Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2010
Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2010
 
Caesars LEAN Operations_FINAL_v3
Caesars LEAN Operations_FINAL_v3Caesars LEAN Operations_FINAL_v3
Caesars LEAN Operations_FINAL_v3
 
Consulting & Entrepreneurship Quiz - Answers
Consulting & Entrepreneurship Quiz - AnswersConsulting & Entrepreneurship Quiz - Answers
Consulting & Entrepreneurship Quiz - Answers
 
Case Study : priceline.com
Case Study : priceline.comCase Study : priceline.com
Case Study : priceline.com
 
The royal bank of scotland
The royal bank of scotlandThe royal bank of scotland
The royal bank of scotland
 
McKinsey & Company: Managing Knowledge and Learning
McKinsey & Company:  Managing Knowledge and LearningMcKinsey & Company:  Managing Knowledge and Learning
McKinsey & Company: Managing Knowledge and Learning
 
Snapple Case Study
Snapple Case StudySnapple Case Study
Snapple Case Study
 
D.Light Design Case Study Ananlysis
D.Light Design Case Study AnanlysisD.Light Design Case Study Ananlysis
D.Light Design Case Study Ananlysis
 
Case 1 Medisys Corp
Case 1 Medisys CorpCase 1 Medisys Corp
Case 1 Medisys Corp
 
Clique Pens Pricing: The Writing Implements Division of U.S. Home
Clique Pens Pricing: The Writing Implements Division of U.S. Home Clique Pens Pricing: The Writing Implements Division of U.S. Home
Clique Pens Pricing: The Writing Implements Division of U.S. Home
 
Case study xerox
Case study   xeroxCase study   xerox
Case study xerox
 
Som case study - dont bother me i cant cope
Som   case study - dont bother me i cant copeSom   case study - dont bother me i cant cope
Som case study - dont bother me i cant cope
 

Similar a Xerox benchmarking

Reessssssssssßdddeeeeeeeeeeeengineering.ppt
Reessssssssssßdddeeeeeeeeeeeengineering.pptReessssssssssßdddeeeeeeeeeeeengineering.ppt
Reessssssssssßdddeeeeeeeeeeeengineering.ppt
AyaMofre7
 
Process change - change managment
Process change - change managmentProcess change - change managment
Process change - change managment
Adarsh Pawaiya
 

Similar a Xerox benchmarking (20)

Benchmarking
BenchmarkingBenchmarking
Benchmarking
 
Benchmarking.ppt
Benchmarking.pptBenchmarking.ppt
Benchmarking.ppt
 
Benchmarking
BenchmarkingBenchmarking
Benchmarking
 
Benchmarking models
Benchmarking modelsBenchmarking models
Benchmarking models
 
Reessssssssssßdddeeeeeeeeeeeengineering.ppt
Reessssssssssßdddeeeeeeeeeeeengineering.pptReessssssssssßdddeeeeeeeeeeeengineering.ppt
Reessssssssssßdddeeeeeeeeeeeengineering.ppt
 
2 six sigma
2  six sigma2  six sigma
2 six sigma
 
Case copy
Case   copyCase   copy
Case copy
 
Process change - change managment
Process change - change managmentProcess change - change managment
Process change - change managment
 
Quality By Design Total Quality Management
Quality By Design Total Quality ManagementQuality By Design Total Quality Management
Quality By Design Total Quality Management
 
Total Quality Management (TQM)
Total Quality Management (TQM)Total Quality Management (TQM)
Total Quality Management (TQM)
 
How to implement operational excellence in organizations
How to implement operational excellence in organizationsHow to implement operational excellence in organizations
How to implement operational excellence in organizations
 
fkiQuality overview 2014 09
fkiQuality overview 2014 09fkiQuality overview 2014 09
fkiQuality overview 2014 09
 
Production, Logistics, and Purchase strategy
Production, Logistics, and Purchase strategyProduction, Logistics, and Purchase strategy
Production, Logistics, and Purchase strategy
 
Agile metrics - Agile KC Meeting 9/26/13
Agile metrics - Agile KC Meeting 9/26/13Agile metrics - Agile KC Meeting 9/26/13
Agile metrics - Agile KC Meeting 9/26/13
 
Benchmarking : An essential Quality tool
Benchmarking : An essential Quality toolBenchmarking : An essential Quality tool
Benchmarking : An essential Quality tool
 
Tqm
TqmTqm
Tqm
 
OM2_Lecture 11vvvhhbbjjbjdjjeebjrhvhuuhh
OM2_Lecture 11vvvhhbbjjbjdjjeebjrhvhuuhhOM2_Lecture 11vvvhhbbjjbjdjjeebjrhvhuuhh
OM2_Lecture 11vvvhhbbjjbjdjjeebjrhvhuuhh
 
Game Changing Quality Strategies that Drive Organizational Excellence
Game Changing Quality Strategies that Drive Organizational ExcellenceGame Changing Quality Strategies that Drive Organizational Excellence
Game Changing Quality Strategies that Drive Organizational Excellence
 
Six sigma in Wipro
Six sigma in WiproSix sigma in Wipro
Six sigma in Wipro
 
Proposal plan final draft
Proposal plan final draftProposal plan final draft
Proposal plan final draft
 

Más de Ankit Phartiyal

Más de Ankit Phartiyal (7)

Hrm hsbc (1)
Hrm hsbc (1)Hrm hsbc (1)
Hrm hsbc (1)
 
Adl matrix (1)
Adl matrix (1)Adl matrix (1)
Adl matrix (1)
 
Inflation final
Inflation finalInflation final
Inflation final
 
Mc d ind
Mc d indMc d ind
Mc d ind
 
Ethics canara bank
Ethics canara bankEthics canara bank
Ethics canara bank
 
Us bottle case
Us bottle caseUs bottle case
Us bottle case
 
Ethics canara bank
Ethics canara bankEthics canara bank
Ethics canara bank
 

Xerox benchmarking

  • 1. OPERATION MANAGEMENT SUBMITED TO: SUBMITED BY: GROUP 7 NITISH GOEL (65) DR. R.K SINGH SANTOSH GHILDIYAL (72) ANKIT PHARTIYAL (77) LAISHRAM ARNOLD (91) DHEERAJ KUMAR (118)
  • 2.
  • 3.
  • 4. BENCHMARKING  Process of improving performance by constantly identifying, understanding and adapting best practices and processes.  Comparing one's organization or a part of it with that of the other companies.
  • 6. Benefits of Benchmarking  Promotes a thorough understanding of company’s own process  Saves time and money  Identify non value added activities  Focuses on performance measures and processes and not on products  It provides a basis for training human resource
  • 7. STAGES IN A BENCHMARKING Planning:  Identifying, establishing and documenting specific study focus areas.  The best-practice companies are identified and appropriate data collection tools are selected. Data collection:  Information is mainly collected through questionnaires administered to all best practice companies. Data analysis & Report:  Involves the critical evaluation of practices followed, and the identification of practices that help and deter superior performance. Adaptation
  • 8. Benchmarking at Xerox Benchmarking against Japanese: Xerox found that, -They take twice as long as its Japanese competitors. -Five times number of engineers. - Four times the number of design change. - Three times the design cost. Company found that Japanese could produce, ship and sell units for about the same amount that it cost Xerox to manufacture them. Xerox’s products had over 30,000 defective parts per million—about 30 times more than its competitors.
  • 9. Benchmarking Model at Xerox • Planning: Determining the subject to be benchmarked, identify the relevant best practice and develop most appropriate data collection technique. •Analysis: Assess the strengths of competitors and compare Xerox’s performance with competitors. • Integration: Establish necessary goals and integrate these goals into the company’s formal planning processes. • Action: Implement action plans established and assess them periodically to determine whether the company is achieving its objectives. • Maturity: Determine whether the company has attained a superior performance level.
  • 10. Supplier management system Japanese Companies •It has 1000 suppliers •They trained Vendor’s Employee in Quality Control , manufacturing automation. •Just-in-time i.e. Delivery in small quantities, as per customer’s production Schedule. Xerox • Reduced the vendors from 5000 to 400. • Created a Vendor Certification Process in which suppliers were offered training & told their areas of improvement. • Vendors were consulted for better Designs & Improved Customer service. Inventory Management Inventory holding Time reduction •Xerox asked Branch managers to match the Stocking Policy with Customer’s installation Orders . • As a result CCP ( Capital Cycle Period) was cut by 70% which leads to savings of $ 200 million. • Minimize Inventory Carrying Cost was to delay the assembly of product into the final Configuration.
  • 11. Manufacturing System Managers were encouraged to identify its : Internal Customers ( i.e. Assembly Line Workers) & External Customers ( i.e. End users who load the papers) in order to meet their needs. Marketing Company sent 55,000 questionnaires to monthly to customers to measure customer Satisfaction & record Competitor’s performance. Those Competitors who have scored higher, Xerox benchmark itself against it. Quality As a part of “Leadership Through Quality” program, Xerox started providing its customers( External & Internal) innovative products & services. Total Quality Management Team consists of Senior managers & Consultants from McKinsey help to make TQM. Under which New three SBUs were introduced: Enterprise Service Business Office Copiers Home Copiers All these have autonomy in Engineering, marketing & pricing.
  • 12. Reaping The Benefits • Number of defects reduced by 78 per 100 machines. • Service response time reduced by 27%. • Inspection of incoming components reduced to below 5%. • Defects in incoming parts reduced to 150ppm. • Inventory costs reduced by two-thirds. • Marketing productivity increased by one-third. • Distribution productivity increased by 8-10%.
  • 13. • Increased product reliability on account of 40% reduction in unscheduled maintenance. • Errors in billing reduced from 8.3% to 3.5% percent. • Became the leader in the high-volume copier-duplicator market segment. • Country units improved sales from 152% to 328%. • Xerox went to be only company to win three prestigious quality awards- Malcolm Baldridge National award, Deming award ,and European quality award . • During 1990s, Xerox, along with companies like Ford, AT&T, IBM, Motorola created the International Benchmarking Clearinghouse (IBC) to promote Benchmarking and guide companies across the world in benchmarking efforts.