SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 54
INFERENCE
   AND
SYLLOGISM
   It is the mental activity whereby starting with several
    judgments which we relate to one another, we arrive
    at a new judgment which necessarily follows from
    the preceding ones.

   Every reasoning process, involves a number of
    previously known truths. These truths are called
    premises. The reasoning process also involves the
    knowledge of a new truth (the conclusion).
   It is the drawing of a conclusion from one or more
    premises. There are 2 kinds of inference:
    immediate and mediate.
   Immediate – when a conclusion is drawn from only
    one premise.
   Mediate – when a conclusion is drawn from two
    premises.
   The mental product of inference is called an
    argument: The external expression of which is
    called a syllogism.
   It is the logical process in which the premises relate
    two terms with a third (middle), and the relationship
    is expressed in the conclusion that either unites
    (affirmative) or separates (negative) the first two
    terms
   It is an inference that draws the conclusion in an
    absolute manner. Here, when the first 2 propositions
    are posited as true, the third must also be true.
   All animals are substances.
    But, a dog is an animal.
    Therefore, a dog is a substance.
   It is an inference which concludes with certainty,
    affirming or denying a statement, from the
    affirmation or denial of another.
   If the students plagiarize, then they should be
    punished.
    The students plagiarize.
    Therefore, they should be punished.
   Either you pass the test, or you fail.
    You pass.
    Therefore, you did not fail.
   All humans are mortal.
    All Filipinos are humans.
    Thus, all Filipinos are mortal.

   Major premise: All humans are mortal.
    Minor premise: All Filipinos are humans.
    Conclusion: All Filipinos are mortal.
   Major term (T) – predicate of the conclusion
    Minor term (t) – subject of the conclusion
    Middle term (M) – found in both premises.
   Figure 1
         M T
          t M
    Thus, t T
   SUB-PRE
   Some scholars are wide-readers.
    Some Filipinos are scholars.
    Thus, Some Filipinos are wide-readers.
   III-1
   Figure 2
          T M
           t M
    Thus, t T
   PRE-PRE
   All great scientists are college graduates.
    Some       professional    athletes   are   college
    graduates.
    Thus, some professional athletes are great
    scientists
   AII-2
   Figure 3
           M T
            M t
    Thus, t T
   SUB-SUB
   All artists are egoists.
    Some artists are paupers.
    Thus, some paupers are egoists.
   AII-3
   Figure 4
          T M
           M t
    Thus, t     T
   PRE-SUB
   No gamblers are quitters.
    All quitters are losers.
    Thus, no losers are gamblers.
   EAE-4
1. No heroes are cowards.
   Some soldiers are cowards.
   Thus, some soldiers are not heroes.
2. All sacrifices are rewarding.
   Some acts of cheating are rewarding.
   Thus, all acts of cheating are sacrifices.
3. All pilots are risk-takers.
   Some pilots are not happy-go-lucky.
   Thus, some risk-takers are not happy-go-lucky.
4. No nuclear-powered submarines are commercial
   vessels, so no warships are commercial vessels,
   since all nuclear-powered submarines are
   warships.
       Some animals are two-legged.
        All people are animals.
        Thus, all people are two-legged.

          All animals are mortal.
          Some animals are dogs.
          Thus, some dogs are mortal.
1. There must only be 3 univocal terms, each of
   which occurs twice but not in the same
   proposition.
   A father is a male parent.
   The Holy Pope is a father.
   Thus, the Holy Pope is a male parent.
   *Fallacy of Equivocation

  All flowers are beautiful.
  All roses are flowers.
  Thus, all roses are beautiful.
2. The middle term must not occur in the
   conclusion.

  A goddess is a female.
  A goddess is a deity.
  Thus, a goddess is a female deity.
  *Fallacy of Misplaced Middle Term
3. The middle tem must be distributed atleast once,
   in the premises.

  All lions are animals.    Tu (+) Mp
  All men are animals.      tu (+) Mp
  Thus, all men are lions. tu (+) Tp
  * Fallacy of the Undistributed Middle Term

  All trees are plants.
  All kamagong are plants.
  Thus, all kamagong are trees.
4. If a term is distributed in the conclusion, then
   such term must be distributed in the premise.

  Some lawyers are holy.            Tp (+) Mp
  No criminals are holy.            tu (-) Mu
  Thus, no criminals are lawyers. tu (-) Tu
  * Fallacy of the Illicit Major Term

  All birds have wings.             Mu (+) Tp
  All birds are animals.            Mu (+) tp
  Thus, all animals have wings.      tu (+) Tp
  * Fallacy of the Illicit Minor Term
5. There must be not 2 particular premises; one
   premise atleast must be universal.

  Some priest are holy.         Tp (+) Mp
  Some nuns are holy.           tp (+) Mp
  Thus, some nuns are priests. tp (+) Tp
  *Fallacy of Two Particular Premises

  Some scholars are wide-readers.
  Some Filipinos are scholars.
  Thus, Some Filipinos are wide-readers.
6. If one premise is prticular, the conclusion must
    be particular.

  All lawyers are professionals.     Tu (+) Mp
  Some criminals are professionals.  tp (+) Mp
  Thus, some criminals are lawyers. tp (+) Tp
  * Fallacy of Undistributed Middle Term

  Some animals are two-legged.
  All people are animals.
  Thus, all people are two-legged.
  * Fallacy of Universal Conclusion drawn from a
     Particular Premise
7. If the conclusion is negative, only one premise
    must be negative.

  No tenor is a soprano.
  No soprano is a baritone.
  Thus, no baritone is a tenor.
  *Negative Premises

  All lawyers are professionals.
  Some criminals are not professionals.
  Thus, some criminals are lawyers.
  *Fallacy of Illicit Exclusion
8. Two affirmative premises cannot give a negative
   conclusion.

  All stones are hard.              Mu (+) Tp
  Some diamonds are stones.         tp (+) Mp
  Thus, some diamonds are not hard. tp (-) Tu

  * Fallacy of a Negative Conclusion drawn from
  Affirmative Premises
1. No heroes are cowards.
   Some soldiers are cowards.
   Thus, some soldiers are heroes.
2. All sacrifices are rewarding.
   Some acts of cheating are rewarding.
   Thus, all acts of cheating are sacrifices.
3. Some pilots are not happy-go-lucky.
   All pilots are risk-takers.
   Thus, some risk-takers are happy-go-lucky.
4. Some mosquitoes are blood-suckers.
   All vampires are blood-suckers.
   Thus, all vampires are mosquitoes
    Figure 1 (SUB-PRE)
          M T
           t M
     Thus, t T

1.   The major premise must be universal.
2.   The minor premise must be affirmative.
   The major premise must be universal.
   Some males are married.
    All priests are males.
    Thus, some priests are married.



   The minor premise must be affirmative.
   All surgeons are doctors.
    No anesthesiologists are surgeons.
    Thus, no anesthesiologists are doctors.
   BARBARA – AAA
   CELARENT – EAE
   DARII – AII
   FERIO - EIO
    Figure 2 (PRE-PRE)
          T M
           t M
     Thus, t T

1.   One premise must be negative.
2.   The major premise must be universal.
   One premise must be negative.
    All great scientists are college graduates.
    Some prof. athletes are college graduates.
    Thus, some prof. athletes are great scientists.



   The major premise must be universal.
    Some lawyers are liars.
    No honest citizens are liars.
    Thus, no honest citizens are lawyers.
   CESARE – EAE
   CAMESTRES – AEE
   FESTINO – EIO
   BAROCO - AOO
    Figure 3 (SUB-SUB)
          M T
           M t
     Thus, t T

1.   The minor premise must be affirmative.
2.   The conclusion must be particular.
   The minor premise must be affirmative.
    All murdered are criminals.
    No murderers are saints.
    Thus, no saints are criminals.

   The conclusion must be particular.
    Some movies are violent.
    All movies are works of art.
    Thus, all works of art are violent.
   DARAPTI – AAI
   DISAMIS – IAI
   DATISI – AII
   FELAPTON – EAO
   BOCARDO – OAO
   FERISON - EIO
    Figure 4 (PRE-SUB)
           T M
            M t
     Thus, t    T
1.   If the MP is affirmative, the mp must be
     universal.
2.   If the mp is affirmative, the conclusion must
     be particular.
3.   If one premise is (-), the MP must be
     universal
   If the MP is affirmative, the mp must be
    universal.
    Some males are criminals.
    Some criminals are females.
    Thus, some females are males.

   If the mp is affirmative, the conclusion
    must be particular.
    All postmen are workers.
    Some workers are professors.
    Thus, all professors are postmen.
   If one premise is negative, the MP must be
    universal.
    Some criminals are terrorists.
    No terrorists are women.
    Thus, no women are criminals.
   BRAMANTIP – AAI
   CAMENES – AEE
   DIMARIS – IAI
   FESAPO – EAO
   FRESISON - EIO
1. Is AOO a valid mood under figure 1?
2. Is OAO a valid mood under figure 2?

3. Is AEE a valid mood under figure 3?

4. Some politicians are pro-poor.

   Some teachers are pro-poor.
   Thus, some teachers are politicians.
5. All carabaos are black.
   Some cats are black.
   Thus, some cats are carabaos.
   Its major premise is a hypothetical proposition,
    while its minor premise and conclusion are
    categorical propositions. Here, there is no major
    term (P), minor term (S), & middle term (M).

   If the students plagiarize, then they should be
    punished.
    The students plagiarize.
    Therefore, they should be punished.
1. Conditional Syllogism

  MP – Hypothetical Proposition
  mp – Categorical Proposition
  C – Categorical Proposition
1. Posit the antecedent, posit the consequent
   (MODUS PONENS)
   -If the antecedent is affirmed in the mp, the
   consequent must also be affirmed in the conclusion.
   Consequent’s truth follows from the antecedent’s.
Ex: If someone wins in the lotto draw, one becomes a
   millionaire.
   Son Gokou wins in the lotto draw.
   Thus, Son Gokou becomes a millionaire.
   *p‫כ‬q
     p
     ‫؞‬q     VALID
2. Sublate the consequent, sublate the antecedent.
    (MODUS TOLLENS)
    - If the consequent is rejected in the mp, the
    antecedent must also be rejected in the conclusion.
    Antecedent’s falsity follows from the consequent’s.
Ex: If the best pres. cand. is Miguel Imburnal, then the
    worst pres. cand. is Pepot Kuyukot.
    The worst pres. cand. Is not Pepot Kuyukot.
    Thus, the best pres. cand. is not Miguel Imburnal.

   *p‫כ‬q
   ~q
   ‫~ ؞‬p VALID
3. Posit the consequent, no conclusion (Fallacy of
   Affirming the Consequent)
   - Committed when the consequent is affirmed in the
   mp.
Ex: If it is raining, then Rolando is absent.
   Rolando is absent.
   Thus, it is raining.

   (There must be no conclusion)

   *p‫כ‬q
    q
    ‫؞‬p  INVALID
4. Sublate the antecedent, no conclusion (Fallacy of
   Rejecting the Antecedent)
   - It is committed when the antecedent is rejected in
   the mp.
Ex: If it is raining, then Roland is absent.
   It is not raining.
   Thus, Roland is not absent.

   (There must be no conclusion)

   *p‫כ‬q
    ~p
    ‫~ ؞‬q INVALID
1. If this month is December, next month is January.
   This month is not December.
   Thus, next month is not January.

2. If you failed in the test, you did not pass.
   You did not pass.
   Thus, you failed.

*EXEMPTIONS
Identify the proper conclusion to these c.syllogisms if the
   mp is valid. If the mp is invalid, place NO CONCLUSION.
1. If you cheat, you will fail.
    You did not cheat.
    _________________________
2. If UST beats ADMU in this game, we will be exempted from the final
      exam.
    UST did not win in this game.
    _________________________
3. If each O is P, then no R is S.
   All R is S.
    _________________________
4. If every B is C, then each D is I.
    No D is I.
    _________________________
5. If every B is C, then each D is I.
   No B is C.
   __________________________
MP – Disjunctive Proposition
mp – Categorical Proposition
C - Categorical Proposition

Ex: Jojo Kulot is either guilty or not guilty.
    Jojo Kulot is guilty. (affirmed)
    Thus, Jojo Kulot is not guilty. (rejected)
1. Strict Disjunctive
- “Only one member is true & both cannot be true”

Ex: Either Angge is a truthful person or a liar.
    She is telling the truth.
    Thus, she is not a liar.

    *p ˅ q
     p
     ‫~ ؞‬q
*Strict Disjunctive follows the rule:
1. Posit one or more member of the MP in the mp, then
   sublate the remaining in the conclusion.
   (Ponendo-tollens)
   *p ˅ q                    *p ˅ q
     p            or          q
     ‫~ ؞‬q                     ‫~ ؞‬p

   The accused is either guilty or not guilty.
    He is guilty.
    Thus, he is not not guilty
2. Sublate one or more member of the MP in the mp,
   then posit the remaining in the conclusion.
   (Tollendo-ponens)
    *p ˅ q                   *p ˅ q
     ~p            or         ~q
     ‫؞‬q                       ‫؞‬p

   The military operation in Basilan is either successful
    or unsuccessful.
    It is not successful.
    Thus, it is unsuccessful.
*Broad Disjunctive
   - “Only one member is true, but both may also
   be true.”
   - Sublate 1 or more members of the MP in the
   mp, then posit the remaining in the C.
   Either Pepe likes to dive or play chess.
   Pepe does not like to dive.
   Thus, he likes to play chess.
   *p ˅ q                     *p ˅ q
     ~p             or         ~q
     ‫؞‬q                         ‫؞‬p
  It is possible that he does not likes to do both.
   Pepe was not able to finish his thesis either because
    he is lazy or deadened.
    He is not lazy.
    Thus, he is deadened.
    *p ˅ q
     ~p
     ‫؞‬q
   Pepe was not able to finish his thesis either because
    he is lazy or deadened.
    He is lazy.
    Thus, he is not deadened.
    *p ˅ q
     p
     ‫~ ؞‬q
MP – Conjunctive Proposition
mp – Categorical Proposition
C - Categorical Proposition
Rule 1: Posit one alternative, sublate the other.
Ex: You cannot be a good husband and philosopher at
   the same time.
    You are a good husband.
    Thus, you are not a good philosopher.
   * ~(p • q)
      p
    ‫~ ؞‬q
Rule 2: Sublate one alternative, no conclusion
Ex: The passenger cannot be in the tricycle and in the
    bus at the same time.
   He is not in the tricycle.
   Thus, he is in the bus.
   * ~(p • q)
      ~p
    ‫ ؞‬q
1. (p ‫ כ‬q) ‫ כ‬r
  ~q
 ‫(~ ؞‬p ‫ כ‬r)
2. (p ‫ כ‬q) ˅ (q ˅ r)
   ~(q ˅ r)
 ‫؞‬p‫כ‬q
3. (p ‫ כ‬q) • r
    p‫כ‬q
    ‫~ ؞‬r
4. If Angola achieves stability, then both Botswana
    and Chile will adopt more liberal policies. But
    Botswana will not adopt a more liberal policy. Thus,
    Angola will achieve stability.
1. If Montana suffers a severe drought, then, if
    Nevada has its normal light rainfall, Oregon’s
    water supply will be greatly reduced. Nevada
    does have its normal light rainfall. So if Oregon’s
    water supply is greatly reduced, then Montana
    suffers a severe drought.
2. p ‫( כ‬q • r)
   (q ˅ r) ‫ כ‬s
    ‫؞‬p‫כ‬s
Syllogism 2

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente

Categorical syllogism
Categorical syllogismCategorical syllogism
Categorical syllogism3842
 
Categorical Syllogism-MCM
Categorical Syllogism-MCMCategorical Syllogism-MCM
Categorical Syllogism-MCMRoyPerfuma
 
Logical Opposition (Social Philosophy and Logic)
Logical Opposition (Social Philosophy and Logic)Logical Opposition (Social Philosophy and Logic)
Logical Opposition (Social Philosophy and Logic)Daryl Melo
 
Part ii, lesson 4 the square of opposition
Part ii, lesson 4  the square of oppositionPart ii, lesson 4  the square of opposition
Part ii, lesson 4 the square of oppositionshovanam Prakash
 
Hypothetical & Modal Propositions
Hypothetical & Modal PropositionsHypothetical & Modal Propositions
Hypothetical & Modal PropositionsEm Dangla
 
001 logic09_syllogism
001  logic09_syllogism001  logic09_syllogism
001 logic09_syllogismKate Balgos
 
4.4 Conversion Obversion And Contraposition
4.4   Conversion Obversion And Contraposition4.4   Conversion Obversion And Contraposition
4.4 Conversion Obversion And ContrapositionNicholas Lykins
 
Categorical syllogism
Categorical syllogismCategorical syllogism
Categorical syllogismNoel Jopson
 
1.3.2 Conditional Statements
1.3.2 Conditional Statements1.3.2 Conditional Statements
1.3.2 Conditional Statementssmiller5
 
Creating categorical syllogisms
Creating categorical syllogismsCreating categorical syllogisms
Creating categorical syllogismsSteve Wyre
 

La actualidad más candente (20)

Categorical syllogism
Categorical syllogismCategorical syllogism
Categorical syllogism
 
Categorical Syllogism-MCM
Categorical Syllogism-MCMCategorical Syllogism-MCM
Categorical Syllogism-MCM
 
Syllogism
SyllogismSyllogism
Syllogism
 
Logical Opposition (Social Philosophy and Logic)
Logical Opposition (Social Philosophy and Logic)Logical Opposition (Social Philosophy and Logic)
Logical Opposition (Social Philosophy and Logic)
 
Part ii, lesson 4 the square of opposition
Part ii, lesson 4  the square of oppositionPart ii, lesson 4  the square of opposition
Part ii, lesson 4 the square of opposition
 
LOGIC: Ideas & Terms
LOGIC: Ideas & TermsLOGIC: Ideas & Terms
LOGIC: Ideas & Terms
 
Logggiiiccc.!
Logggiiiccc.!Logggiiiccc.!
Logggiiiccc.!
 
Categorical propositions
Categorical propositionsCategorical propositions
Categorical propositions
 
Logic Ppt
Logic PptLogic Ppt
Logic Ppt
 
Hypothetical & Modal Propositions
Hypothetical & Modal PropositionsHypothetical & Modal Propositions
Hypothetical & Modal Propositions
 
Eduction (ph1)
Eduction (ph1)Eduction (ph1)
Eduction (ph1)
 
001 logic09_syllogism
001  logic09_syllogism001  logic09_syllogism
001 logic09_syllogism
 
4.4 Conversion Obversion And Contraposition
4.4   Conversion Obversion And Contraposition4.4   Conversion Obversion And Contraposition
4.4 Conversion Obversion And Contraposition
 
Conversion (LOGIC)
Conversion (LOGIC)Conversion (LOGIC)
Conversion (LOGIC)
 
Categorical syllogism
Categorical syllogismCategorical syllogism
Categorical syllogism
 
1.3.2 Conditional Statements
1.3.2 Conditional Statements1.3.2 Conditional Statements
1.3.2 Conditional Statements
 
Logic.ppt.
Logic.ppt.Logic.ppt.
Logic.ppt.
 
Philo 1 inference
Philo 1 inferencePhilo 1 inference
Philo 1 inference
 
5.3 Rules And Fallacies
5.3   Rules And Fallacies5.3   Rules And Fallacies
5.3 Rules And Fallacies
 
Creating categorical syllogisms
Creating categorical syllogismsCreating categorical syllogisms
Creating categorical syllogisms
 

Destacado

5.1 Standard Form Mood And Figure
5.1   Standard Form Mood And Figure5.1   Standard Form Mood And Figure
5.1 Standard Form Mood And FigureNicholas Lykins
 
Unity, coherence, emphasis
Unity, coherence, emphasisUnity, coherence, emphasis
Unity, coherence, emphasisNick Nicolas
 
Scott mc cormick float mobile learning_winningoverstakeholders_mlearncon2012
Scott mc cormick float mobile learning_winningoverstakeholders_mlearncon2012Scott mc cormick float mobile learning_winningoverstakeholders_mlearncon2012
Scott mc cormick float mobile learning_winningoverstakeholders_mlearncon2012Scott McCormick
 
Pakiet angielski
Pakiet angielskiPakiet angielski
Pakiet angielskifederacja
 
Presentation 1
Presentation 1Presentation 1
Presentation 1ambermich
 
Thesimplelife(1)
Thesimplelife(1)Thesimplelife(1)
Thesimplelife(1)007rikki
 
Big ideas pecha kucha
Big ideas pecha kuchaBig ideas pecha kucha
Big ideas pecha kuchasfioretti
 
Launch X431 digimaster 3 - Digimasteriii upgrade-notice
Launch X431 digimaster 3 - Digimasteriii upgrade-noticeLaunch X431 digimaster 3 - Digimasteriii upgrade-notice
Launch X431 digimaster 3 - Digimasteriii upgrade-noticeAmy joe
 
How to use Ford Scan Tools - Ford Scanner Use Manual | VtoolShop
How to use Ford Scan Tools - Ford Scanner Use Manual | VtoolShopHow to use Ford Scan Tools - Ford Scanner Use Manual | VtoolShop
How to use Ford Scan Tools - Ford Scanner Use Manual | VtoolShopAmy joe
 
Putu Wahyuni Utari Dewi - 3249 - IT Teaching Media
Putu Wahyuni Utari Dewi - 3249 - IT Teaching MediaPutu Wahyuni Utari Dewi - 3249 - IT Teaching Media
Putu Wahyuni Utari Dewi - 3249 - IT Teaching Mediayuniutari
 
Hipertensi¢n arterial
Hipertensi¢n arterialHipertensi¢n arterial
Hipertensi¢n arterialRikardo Rojas
 
Phrasal verbs oficina flir
Phrasal verbs oficina flirPhrasal verbs oficina flir
Phrasal verbs oficina flirMary Aby
 
Shaping the role_of_hr_546
Shaping the role_of_hr_546Shaping the role_of_hr_546
Shaping the role_of_hr_546Naresh Trainer
 

Destacado (19)

Syllogism
SyllogismSyllogism
Syllogism
 
Syllogistic figures
Syllogistic figuresSyllogistic figures
Syllogistic figures
 
5.1 Standard Form Mood And Figure
5.1   Standard Form Mood And Figure5.1   Standard Form Mood And Figure
5.1 Standard Form Mood And Figure
 
Coherence in Writing
Coherence in WritingCoherence in Writing
Coherence in Writing
 
Unity, coherence, emphasis
Unity, coherence, emphasisUnity, coherence, emphasis
Unity, coherence, emphasis
 
The paragraph
The paragraphThe paragraph
The paragraph
 
Scott mc cormick float mobile learning_winningoverstakeholders_mlearncon2012
Scott mc cormick float mobile learning_winningoverstakeholders_mlearncon2012Scott mc cormick float mobile learning_winningoverstakeholders_mlearncon2012
Scott mc cormick float mobile learning_winningoverstakeholders_mlearncon2012
 
Pakiet angielski
Pakiet angielskiPakiet angielski
Pakiet angielski
 
Hogyan dolgozunk
Hogyan dolgozunkHogyan dolgozunk
Hogyan dolgozunk
 
Presentation 1
Presentation 1Presentation 1
Presentation 1
 
Thesimplelife(1)
Thesimplelife(1)Thesimplelife(1)
Thesimplelife(1)
 
Big ideas pecha kucha
Big ideas pecha kuchaBig ideas pecha kucha
Big ideas pecha kucha
 
Launch X431 digimaster 3 - Digimasteriii upgrade-notice
Launch X431 digimaster 3 - Digimasteriii upgrade-noticeLaunch X431 digimaster 3 - Digimasteriii upgrade-notice
Launch X431 digimaster 3 - Digimasteriii upgrade-notice
 
How to use Ford Scan Tools - Ford Scanner Use Manual | VtoolShop
How to use Ford Scan Tools - Ford Scanner Use Manual | VtoolShopHow to use Ford Scan Tools - Ford Scanner Use Manual | VtoolShop
How to use Ford Scan Tools - Ford Scanner Use Manual | VtoolShop
 
Putu Wahyuni Utari Dewi - 3249 - IT Teaching Media
Putu Wahyuni Utari Dewi - 3249 - IT Teaching MediaPutu Wahyuni Utari Dewi - 3249 - IT Teaching Media
Putu Wahyuni Utari Dewi - 3249 - IT Teaching Media
 
Hipertensi¢n arterial
Hipertensi¢n arterialHipertensi¢n arterial
Hipertensi¢n arterial
 
Phrasal verbs oficina flir
Phrasal verbs oficina flirPhrasal verbs oficina flir
Phrasal verbs oficina flir
 
Responding to your hbs decision
Responding to your hbs decisionResponding to your hbs decision
Responding to your hbs decision
 
Shaping the role_of_hr_546
Shaping the role_of_hr_546Shaping the role_of_hr_546
Shaping the role_of_hr_546
 

Similar a Syllogism 2 (20)

Logiclecsf
LogiclecsfLogiclecsf
Logiclecsf
 
Categorical Syllogism
Categorical SyllogismCategorical Syllogism
Categorical Syllogism
 
9 2 t4_chapterninepowerpoint
9 2 t4_chapterninepowerpoint9 2 t4_chapterninepowerpoint
9 2 t4_chapterninepowerpoint
 
Lecture 1.pptx
Lecture 1.pptxLecture 1.pptx
Lecture 1.pptx
 
MATHMOW_LESSON-7.pptx
MATHMOW_LESSON-7.pptxMATHMOW_LESSON-7.pptx
MATHMOW_LESSON-7.pptx
 
Logic
LogicLogic
Logic
 
AppTheories_L3
AppTheories_L3AppTheories_L3
AppTheories_L3
 
Logic booklet, by Jovelle C. Abello class 101
Logic booklet, by Jovelle C. Abello class 101Logic booklet, by Jovelle C. Abello class 101
Logic booklet, by Jovelle C. Abello class 101
 
2 Aristotle Logic
2 Aristotle Logic2 Aristotle Logic
2 Aristotle Logic
 
Reasoning (Logic)
Reasoning (Logic)Reasoning (Logic)
Reasoning (Logic)
 
Syllogisms and Logic WorksheetPHL251 Version 52University.docx
Syllogisms and Logic WorksheetPHL251 Version 52University.docxSyllogisms and Logic WorksheetPHL251 Version 52University.docx
Syllogisms and Logic WorksheetPHL251 Version 52University.docx
 
Logical Reasoning for NET SET Exam
Logical Reasoning for NET SET ExamLogical Reasoning for NET SET Exam
Logical Reasoning for NET SET Exam
 
Logical reasoning For NET/SET
Logical reasoning For NET/SET Logical reasoning For NET/SET
Logical reasoning For NET/SET
 
judgment and proposition
judgment and propositionjudgment and proposition
judgment and proposition
 
Week 4.1 deductive & inductive reasoning
Week 4.1 deductive & inductive reasoningWeek 4.1 deductive & inductive reasoning
Week 4.1 deductive & inductive reasoning
 
Deductive and Inductive Reasoning with Vizzini
Deductive and Inductive Reasoning with VizziniDeductive and Inductive Reasoning with Vizzini
Deductive and Inductive Reasoning with Vizzini
 
Deductive reasoning
Deductive reasoningDeductive reasoning
Deductive reasoning
 
Logic By Dr. Syed Imad Shah
Logic By Dr. Syed Imad ShahLogic By Dr. Syed Imad Shah
Logic By Dr. Syed Imad Shah
 
Context Clues(New)
Context Clues(New)Context Clues(New)
Context Clues(New)
 
Arguments
ArgumentsArguments
Arguments
 

Syllogism 2

  • 1. INFERENCE AND SYLLOGISM
  • 2. It is the mental activity whereby starting with several judgments which we relate to one another, we arrive at a new judgment which necessarily follows from the preceding ones.  Every reasoning process, involves a number of previously known truths. These truths are called premises. The reasoning process also involves the knowledge of a new truth (the conclusion).
  • 3. It is the drawing of a conclusion from one or more premises. There are 2 kinds of inference: immediate and mediate.  Immediate – when a conclusion is drawn from only one premise.  Mediate – when a conclusion is drawn from two premises.  The mental product of inference is called an argument: The external expression of which is called a syllogism.
  • 4. It is the logical process in which the premises relate two terms with a third (middle), and the relationship is expressed in the conclusion that either unites (affirmative) or separates (negative) the first two terms  It is an inference that draws the conclusion in an absolute manner. Here, when the first 2 propositions are posited as true, the third must also be true.  All animals are substances. But, a dog is an animal. Therefore, a dog is a substance.
  • 5. It is an inference which concludes with certainty, affirming or denying a statement, from the affirmation or denial of another.  If the students plagiarize, then they should be punished. The students plagiarize. Therefore, they should be punished.  Either you pass the test, or you fail. You pass. Therefore, you did not fail.
  • 6. All humans are mortal. All Filipinos are humans. Thus, all Filipinos are mortal.  Major premise: All humans are mortal. Minor premise: All Filipinos are humans. Conclusion: All Filipinos are mortal.  Major term (T) – predicate of the conclusion Minor term (t) – subject of the conclusion Middle term (M) – found in both premises.
  • 7. Figure 1  M T t M Thus, t T  SUB-PRE  Some scholars are wide-readers. Some Filipinos are scholars. Thus, Some Filipinos are wide-readers.  III-1
  • 8. Figure 2  T M t M Thus, t T  PRE-PRE  All great scientists are college graduates. Some professional athletes are college graduates. Thus, some professional athletes are great scientists  AII-2
  • 9. Figure 3  M T M t Thus, t T  SUB-SUB  All artists are egoists. Some artists are paupers. Thus, some paupers are egoists.  AII-3
  • 10. Figure 4  T M M t Thus, t T  PRE-SUB  No gamblers are quitters. All quitters are losers. Thus, no losers are gamblers.  EAE-4
  • 11. 1. No heroes are cowards. Some soldiers are cowards. Thus, some soldiers are not heroes. 2. All sacrifices are rewarding. Some acts of cheating are rewarding. Thus, all acts of cheating are sacrifices. 3. All pilots are risk-takers. Some pilots are not happy-go-lucky. Thus, some risk-takers are not happy-go-lucky. 4. No nuclear-powered submarines are commercial vessels, so no warships are commercial vessels, since all nuclear-powered submarines are warships.
  • 12. Some animals are two-legged. All people are animals. Thus, all people are two-legged.  All animals are mortal. Some animals are dogs. Thus, some dogs are mortal.
  • 13. 1. There must only be 3 univocal terms, each of which occurs twice but not in the same proposition. A father is a male parent. The Holy Pope is a father. Thus, the Holy Pope is a male parent. *Fallacy of Equivocation All flowers are beautiful. All roses are flowers. Thus, all roses are beautiful.
  • 14. 2. The middle term must not occur in the conclusion. A goddess is a female. A goddess is a deity. Thus, a goddess is a female deity. *Fallacy of Misplaced Middle Term
  • 15. 3. The middle tem must be distributed atleast once, in the premises. All lions are animals. Tu (+) Mp All men are animals. tu (+) Mp Thus, all men are lions. tu (+) Tp * Fallacy of the Undistributed Middle Term All trees are plants. All kamagong are plants. Thus, all kamagong are trees.
  • 16. 4. If a term is distributed in the conclusion, then such term must be distributed in the premise. Some lawyers are holy. Tp (+) Mp No criminals are holy. tu (-) Mu Thus, no criminals are lawyers. tu (-) Tu * Fallacy of the Illicit Major Term All birds have wings. Mu (+) Tp All birds are animals. Mu (+) tp Thus, all animals have wings. tu (+) Tp * Fallacy of the Illicit Minor Term
  • 17. 5. There must be not 2 particular premises; one premise atleast must be universal. Some priest are holy. Tp (+) Mp Some nuns are holy. tp (+) Mp Thus, some nuns are priests. tp (+) Tp *Fallacy of Two Particular Premises Some scholars are wide-readers. Some Filipinos are scholars. Thus, Some Filipinos are wide-readers.
  • 18. 6. If one premise is prticular, the conclusion must be particular. All lawyers are professionals. Tu (+) Mp Some criminals are professionals. tp (+) Mp Thus, some criminals are lawyers. tp (+) Tp * Fallacy of Undistributed Middle Term Some animals are two-legged. All people are animals. Thus, all people are two-legged. * Fallacy of Universal Conclusion drawn from a Particular Premise
  • 19. 7. If the conclusion is negative, only one premise must be negative. No tenor is a soprano. No soprano is a baritone. Thus, no baritone is a tenor. *Negative Premises All lawyers are professionals. Some criminals are not professionals. Thus, some criminals are lawyers. *Fallacy of Illicit Exclusion
  • 20. 8. Two affirmative premises cannot give a negative conclusion. All stones are hard. Mu (+) Tp Some diamonds are stones. tp (+) Mp Thus, some diamonds are not hard. tp (-) Tu * Fallacy of a Negative Conclusion drawn from Affirmative Premises
  • 21. 1. No heroes are cowards. Some soldiers are cowards. Thus, some soldiers are heroes. 2. All sacrifices are rewarding. Some acts of cheating are rewarding. Thus, all acts of cheating are sacrifices. 3. Some pilots are not happy-go-lucky. All pilots are risk-takers. Thus, some risk-takers are happy-go-lucky. 4. Some mosquitoes are blood-suckers. All vampires are blood-suckers. Thus, all vampires are mosquitoes
  • 22. Figure 1 (SUB-PRE)  M T t M Thus, t T 1. The major premise must be universal. 2. The minor premise must be affirmative.
  • 23. The major premise must be universal.  Some males are married. All priests are males. Thus, some priests are married.  The minor premise must be affirmative.  All surgeons are doctors. No anesthesiologists are surgeons. Thus, no anesthesiologists are doctors.
  • 24. BARBARA – AAA  CELARENT – EAE  DARII – AII  FERIO - EIO
  • 25. Figure 2 (PRE-PRE)  T M t M Thus, t T 1. One premise must be negative. 2. The major premise must be universal.
  • 26. One premise must be negative. All great scientists are college graduates. Some prof. athletes are college graduates. Thus, some prof. athletes are great scientists.  The major premise must be universal. Some lawyers are liars. No honest citizens are liars. Thus, no honest citizens are lawyers.
  • 27. CESARE – EAE  CAMESTRES – AEE  FESTINO – EIO  BAROCO - AOO
  • 28. Figure 3 (SUB-SUB)  M T M t Thus, t T 1. The minor premise must be affirmative. 2. The conclusion must be particular.
  • 29. The minor premise must be affirmative. All murdered are criminals. No murderers are saints. Thus, no saints are criminals.  The conclusion must be particular. Some movies are violent. All movies are works of art. Thus, all works of art are violent.
  • 30. DARAPTI – AAI  DISAMIS – IAI  DATISI – AII  FELAPTON – EAO  BOCARDO – OAO  FERISON - EIO
  • 31. Figure 4 (PRE-SUB)  T M M t Thus, t T 1. If the MP is affirmative, the mp must be universal. 2. If the mp is affirmative, the conclusion must be particular. 3. If one premise is (-), the MP must be universal
  • 32. If the MP is affirmative, the mp must be universal. Some males are criminals. Some criminals are females. Thus, some females are males.  If the mp is affirmative, the conclusion must be particular. All postmen are workers. Some workers are professors. Thus, all professors are postmen.
  • 33. If one premise is negative, the MP must be universal. Some criminals are terrorists. No terrorists are women. Thus, no women are criminals.
  • 34. BRAMANTIP – AAI  CAMENES – AEE  DIMARIS – IAI  FESAPO – EAO  FRESISON - EIO
  • 35. 1. Is AOO a valid mood under figure 1? 2. Is OAO a valid mood under figure 2? 3. Is AEE a valid mood under figure 3? 4. Some politicians are pro-poor. Some teachers are pro-poor. Thus, some teachers are politicians. 5. All carabaos are black. Some cats are black. Thus, some cats are carabaos.
  • 36. Its major premise is a hypothetical proposition, while its minor premise and conclusion are categorical propositions. Here, there is no major term (P), minor term (S), & middle term (M).  If the students plagiarize, then they should be punished. The students plagiarize. Therefore, they should be punished.
  • 37. 1. Conditional Syllogism MP – Hypothetical Proposition mp – Categorical Proposition C – Categorical Proposition
  • 38. 1. Posit the antecedent, posit the consequent (MODUS PONENS) -If the antecedent is affirmed in the mp, the consequent must also be affirmed in the conclusion. Consequent’s truth follows from the antecedent’s. Ex: If someone wins in the lotto draw, one becomes a millionaire. Son Gokou wins in the lotto draw. Thus, Son Gokou becomes a millionaire. *p‫כ‬q p ‫؞‬q VALID
  • 39. 2. Sublate the consequent, sublate the antecedent. (MODUS TOLLENS) - If the consequent is rejected in the mp, the antecedent must also be rejected in the conclusion. Antecedent’s falsity follows from the consequent’s. Ex: If the best pres. cand. is Miguel Imburnal, then the worst pres. cand. is Pepot Kuyukot. The worst pres. cand. Is not Pepot Kuyukot. Thus, the best pres. cand. is not Miguel Imburnal. *p‫כ‬q ~q ‫~ ؞‬p VALID
  • 40. 3. Posit the consequent, no conclusion (Fallacy of Affirming the Consequent) - Committed when the consequent is affirmed in the mp. Ex: If it is raining, then Rolando is absent. Rolando is absent. Thus, it is raining. (There must be no conclusion) *p‫כ‬q q ‫؞‬p INVALID
  • 41. 4. Sublate the antecedent, no conclusion (Fallacy of Rejecting the Antecedent) - It is committed when the antecedent is rejected in the mp. Ex: If it is raining, then Roland is absent. It is not raining. Thus, Roland is not absent. (There must be no conclusion) *p‫כ‬q ~p ‫~ ؞‬q INVALID
  • 42. 1. If this month is December, next month is January. This month is not December. Thus, next month is not January. 2. If you failed in the test, you did not pass. You did not pass. Thus, you failed. *EXEMPTIONS
  • 43. Identify the proper conclusion to these c.syllogisms if the mp is valid. If the mp is invalid, place NO CONCLUSION. 1. If you cheat, you will fail. You did not cheat. _________________________ 2. If UST beats ADMU in this game, we will be exempted from the final exam. UST did not win in this game. _________________________ 3. If each O is P, then no R is S. All R is S. _________________________ 4. If every B is C, then each D is I. No D is I. _________________________ 5. If every B is C, then each D is I. No B is C. __________________________
  • 44. MP – Disjunctive Proposition mp – Categorical Proposition C - Categorical Proposition Ex: Jojo Kulot is either guilty or not guilty. Jojo Kulot is guilty. (affirmed) Thus, Jojo Kulot is not guilty. (rejected)
  • 45. 1. Strict Disjunctive - “Only one member is true & both cannot be true” Ex: Either Angge is a truthful person or a liar. She is telling the truth. Thus, she is not a liar. *p ˅ q p ‫~ ؞‬q
  • 46. *Strict Disjunctive follows the rule: 1. Posit one or more member of the MP in the mp, then sublate the remaining in the conclusion. (Ponendo-tollens) *p ˅ q *p ˅ q p or q ‫~ ؞‬q ‫~ ؞‬p  The accused is either guilty or not guilty. He is guilty. Thus, he is not not guilty
  • 47. 2. Sublate one or more member of the MP in the mp, then posit the remaining in the conclusion. (Tollendo-ponens) *p ˅ q *p ˅ q ~p or ~q ‫؞‬q ‫؞‬p  The military operation in Basilan is either successful or unsuccessful. It is not successful. Thus, it is unsuccessful.
  • 48. *Broad Disjunctive - “Only one member is true, but both may also be true.” - Sublate 1 or more members of the MP in the mp, then posit the remaining in the C. Either Pepe likes to dive or play chess. Pepe does not like to dive. Thus, he likes to play chess. *p ˅ q *p ˅ q ~p or ~q ‫؞‬q ‫؞‬p  It is possible that he does not likes to do both.
  • 49. Pepe was not able to finish his thesis either because he is lazy or deadened. He is not lazy. Thus, he is deadened. *p ˅ q ~p ‫؞‬q  Pepe was not able to finish his thesis either because he is lazy or deadened. He is lazy. Thus, he is not deadened. *p ˅ q p ‫~ ؞‬q
  • 50. MP – Conjunctive Proposition mp – Categorical Proposition C - Categorical Proposition Rule 1: Posit one alternative, sublate the other. Ex: You cannot be a good husband and philosopher at the same time. You are a good husband. Thus, you are not a good philosopher. * ~(p • q) p ‫~ ؞‬q
  • 51. Rule 2: Sublate one alternative, no conclusion Ex: The passenger cannot be in the tricycle and in the bus at the same time. He is not in the tricycle. Thus, he is in the bus. * ~(p • q) ~p ‫ ؞‬q
  • 52. 1. (p ‫ כ‬q) ‫ כ‬r ~q ‫(~ ؞‬p ‫ כ‬r) 2. (p ‫ כ‬q) ˅ (q ˅ r) ~(q ˅ r) ‫؞‬p‫כ‬q 3. (p ‫ כ‬q) • r p‫כ‬q ‫~ ؞‬r 4. If Angola achieves stability, then both Botswana and Chile will adopt more liberal policies. But Botswana will not adopt a more liberal policy. Thus, Angola will achieve stability.
  • 53. 1. If Montana suffers a severe drought, then, if Nevada has its normal light rainfall, Oregon’s water supply will be greatly reduced. Nevada does have its normal light rainfall. So if Oregon’s water supply is greatly reduced, then Montana suffers a severe drought. 2. p ‫( כ‬q • r) (q ˅ r) ‫ כ‬s ‫؞‬p‫כ‬s