1. NORAZUIN BT JAWARI P55723
NURHAFIZA BT MOHD HASSIM P60144
NORIZZA SYAFIQAH BT BAHRIN P65408

2. TRANSPORTATION
•Major impact on the economic development of cities and region.
•Advances in transportation changes in the way of living and great influenced
in development of civilization.
•Public transportation contributed in the shaping of town.
•Areas with efficient public transport are economically thriving and can offer
advantageous for businesses and individuals to work or live in.

3. KAJANG
PUTRAJAYA
BANGI
NILAI
BANDAR SRI PUTRA

4. KTM KOMUTER
-NILAI
-BANGI
-UKM
-KAJANG
BUS
-NILAI ERL
EXISTING
BANGI TRANSPORTATION -NILAI
KAJANG -PUTRAJAYA
PUTRAJAYA
TAXIS
-NILAI
-BANDAR SRI
PUTRA
-BANGI
-KAJANG
-PUTRAJAYA

5. NILAI
PUTRAJAYA
BANDAR SRI PUTRA
BANGI HIGHWAY NILAI
BANGI
KAJANG KAJANG
PUTRAJAYA
KAJANG
PUTRAJAYA
KAJANG
PUTRAJAYA

7. KTM-KOMUTER
Improve on time
punctualities with
less delays
• Longer coaches with
exclusive coach for
ladies.
• more comfortable to
travel and provided
with wifi services

8. • Connected both Bandar
Baru Bangi and Kajang
• More bus routes services
provided (Genting,
Johor,Kedaha and etc.
• Located near to UKM KTM
station
• Located at the center of
Pekan Kajang.

10. Less public trasnportation available here.
Only taxis and mini buses
Provide more services with better time
punctualites

12. TRANSPORT MODELING
 Trip generation
 Determines the frequency of origins or destinations of trips in
each zone by trip purpose, as a function of land uses and
household demographics, and other socio-economic factors.
 Trip distribution
 Matches origins with destinations, often using a gravity model
function, equivalent to an entropy maximizing model.
 Modal split
 Computes the proportion of trips between each origin and
destination that use a particular transportation mode.
 Trip assignment
 Allocates trips between an origin and destination by a particular
mode to a route.

13. POPULATION FOR EACH ZONE
ZONE POPULATION
Kajang 448243
Bandar Baru Bangi 116745
Putrajaya 62457
Bandar Seri Putra 71683
Nilai 38612

14. PRODUCTION AND ATTRACTION
ZONE RESIDENTIAL UNIT PRODUCTION RATE PRODUCTION
Kajang 448243 0.65 291358
Bandar Baru Bangi 116745 0.65 75884
Putrajaya 62457 0.65 40597
Bandar Seri Putra 71683 0.65 46594
Nilai 38612 0.65 25098

15. PRODUCTION AND ATTRACTION
ZONE RESIDENTIAL UNIT ATTRACTION RATE ATTRACTION
Kajang 448243 0.75 336182
Bandar Baru Bangi 116745 0.72 84056
Putrajaya 62457 0.72 44969
Bandar Seri Putra 71683 0.49 35125
Nilai 38612 0.72 27801

16. ADJUSTED PRODUCTION AND
ATTRACTION
ZONE PRODUCTION ATTRACTION
Kajang 291358 336182
Bandar Baru Bangi 75884 84056
Putrajaya 40597 44969
Bandar Seri Putra 46594 35125
Nilai 25098 27801
TOTAL 479531 528133
AVERAGE 503832

17. ADJUSTED PRODUCTION AND
ATTRACTION
ZONE PRODUCTION ATTRACTION
Kajang 306123 320713
Bandar Baru Bangi 79730 80189
Putrajaya 42654 42900
Bandar Seri Putra 48955 33508
Nilai 26370 26521
TOTAL 503832 503832
AVERAGE 503832

18. TRIP PATTERN ( O – D ) MATRIX
Bandar Baru Bandar Seri
ZONE Kajang Putrajaya Nilai PRODUCTION
Bangi Putra
Kajang 194862 48722 26066 20359 16114 306123
Bandar Baru
50752 12690 6789 5303 4197 79730
Bangi
Putrajaya 27152 6789 3632 2837 2245 42654
Bandar Seri
31162 7792 4168 3256 2577 48955
Putra
Nilai 16786 4197 2245 1754 1388 26370
ATTRACTION 320713 80189 42900 33508 26521 503832

19. TRIP ASSIGNMENT
Bandar Baru Bandar Seri
ZONE Kajang Putrajaya Nilai
Bangi Putra
Kajang 48722 26066 20359 16114
Bandar Baru
50752 6789 5303 4197
Bangi
Putrajaya 27152 6789 2837 2245
Bandar Seri
31162 7792 4168 2577
Putra
Nilai 16786 4197 2245 1754

20. Trip Distribution Diagram
125851 Kajang 111261
Bandar
93877 Baru Bangi 78827
Putrajaya
66350 51055
Bandar
Seri Putra
25133
48955 Nilai

21. Policy Changes And
Recommended
Action Plan

22. Government Funding
Gives funding to local
transport services.
In order to maintain and
improve the infrastructure.
Mobility and Traffic Laws
Management
To ensure to be
Aims that by 2025,more successfully
than half commuting trip implemented.
made via public transport.
Mobility centers will be set
Policy Ensure all buses
uses NGV or non
up to coordinate all
transportation
Changes polluting and low
emission fuel to
infrastructure. minimized pollutant.
Improving road signage Parking Management and
and road safety. Park-And-Ride System
More be built at origins rather than
destination.
Parking tickets at a very minimum
and reasonable price to maintain
continuous support.
Safe and secure environment for
parked vehicle.

23. •More car parks be built at origin
rather than destination.
•Play an important role as it can
be integrated with public transport
park-and-ride system
•Provide real time information on
parking space availability
•Safe and secure environment in
the parking spaces
• Urban areas classified as traffic
restrain zone
• entering fee will be charged to
ensure those who choose will
Can drive in stress free
environment
Discourage private car use
Reducing road congestion

24. Improvement on pedestrian path and
walkway
•Increase the safety of
pedestrian
• summons to be issued for
those who cross zebra crossing
without stopping (enforce law)
•Beautify and add in more
landscape with it
•Implement green pedestrian
•Latest improvement was air
conditioned KLCC-Bukit Bintang
Walkway

25.  Proposed in 2010, fully operational in 2016
 Expected to serve on population of 1.2 mil
 Total length of 150 km, with 31 stations and 16
incorporating with park-and- ride system
 Integration with existing Kajang Komuter
Station

26. LRT AND BRT
COST ESTIMATION
CONCLUSION

27. *Generate a new
stretch for LRT to link
2020 : LRT 2020: Bus services the town.
passenger 40 % 1.7 % incremental
incremental only *For bus services, the
service upgrading
into good condition

28. OVERALL PROPOSED ALIGNMENT OF KAJANG –
BANGI – PUTRAJAYA – BANDAR SERI PUTRA – NILAI
3
Park FEEDER
FEEDER N BUS
BUS Ride
KAJANG
15 KM
Integrated with KTM KOMUTER
Park
FEEDER N
BUS 13 KM Ride
PUTRAJAYA
Integrated with KLIA (ERL) FEEDER
BUS
28 KM
BANGI
FEEDER Park LRT Monorail Integrate with
BUS N Elevated BRT
Ride
LEGENDS BANDAR SERI PUTRA
X LRT MONORAIL
X ELEVATED BRT LINE
INTEGRATED STATION FEEDER
NILAI 3
BUS
STATION
NILAI
Integrated with KTM KOMUTER

29. DESIGN DATA FOR LRT MONORAIL
 speed - up to 60km/hr
 capacity – up to 40,000 passengers/hr/dir
 suitable for radial movement and for high
density and high plot ratio area
 relatively smooth and comfortable operation,
easy boarding, attractive stations, and easy-
to-understand routes and schedules
 facilities for disabled are functionality

30. DESIGN DATA FOR BUS RAPID TRANSIT
 Distance between Putrajaya – Kajang - Nilai:
29 km.
 Seats : 60 pass., standees: 25 pass.
 Travel Time = 50 minutes.
 headway = max.30 minutes.
 Average of passenger = 23039 pass./day
 Hours of job: 18 hr. (6:00am-12:00am).
 Time of stopping at terminal :5 minutes.
 Growth Rate : 1.74%
 Elevated BRT for decrease land acquisition

31. PROPOSED INTEGRATED
STATION
PUTRAJAYA STATION
KLIA ERL INTEGRATED WITH
PROPOSED LRT MONORAIL &
ELEVATED BRT
Sources : Elevated BRT Sunway Line, 2012
KAJANG STATION
PROPOSED LRT MONORAIL
INTEGRATED WITH PROPOSED
ELEVATED BRT
BANGI STATION
PROPOSED ELEVATED BRT
INTEGRATED WITH PROPOSED LRT
MONORAIL
NILAI STATION
KTM KOMUTER INTEGRATED WITH
PROPOSED LRT MONORAIL
Sources : Elevated BRT Sunway Line, 2012

32. Low Space
SPEED? Utilization?
PROPOSED LRT
MONORAIL
MINIMAL LAND OPERATE
ACQUISITION? WITHOUT A
DRIVER?
SAFETY?
LESS
Sources : Dean Heaton Mobile Hairdressing,
2008
Environmental
STOP?
High Capacity? Quality And
Conservation?

33. Maximize
Passenger
RIDERSHIP?
Demand?
MINIMAL LAND
Sources : Elevated BRT Sunway Line, 2012
ACQUISITION?
Constructability
Aesthetic
Value?
PROPOSED ELEVATED BUS
RAPID TRANSIT (BRT)

34. SUSTAINABLE
ELECTRIC BUS

35. SIDE
PLATFORM
STATION

36. PEDESTRIAN
CROSSING &
SUSTAINABLE
WALKWAY

37. BRT –SIDE PLATFORM ELEVATED HALT
OPTION -02
PEDESTRIAN CROSSING AT GROUND LEVEL
PLATFORM LEVEL PLAN

38. COST ESTIMATION
LRT MONORAIL
 For five heavy LRT lines, the estimated cost
= RM 50 mil/km
 From Purtajaya – Bangi – Nilai = 28 km
 Construction cost = RM 1.4 Billion
ELEVATED BRT
 For Elevated Bus Rapid Transit = RM50 mil/km
 From Putrajaya-Kajang-Bangi = 29 km
 Total estimated cost = RM 1.45 Billion

39. CONCLUSION
 From our point of personal view that most of people prefer to use
the train compare with the bus for the following reasons:
* Not to waste time on the road by the congestion .
* Uniform time by using the train.
* Easy to use train.
* Comfort in long-distance.
* Easy to access to needed destination.
* Life span of the train.
* Train serves the large number of passengers.
 Finally, from the previous calculations and the estimated costs of
the project, we found that the option of using buses is the best
economically as we can used it on the same current roads also for
lower operating costs compared to use the train, if the design was
subject to the conditions established in the calculations of the trip
distributions .

40. THANK
YOU

41. REFERENCES
http://aibob.blogspot.com/2012/01/vintage-and-rare-photos-of-kuala-lumpur.html
http://www.mymrt.com.my/
http://www.mrt.com.my/
http://malaysiafactbook.com/Maju_Expressway
http://tripwow.tripadvisor.com/slideshow-photo/shaded-walkway-san-michele-anacapri-by-travelpod-member-everardt-
curinga-italy.html?sid=10970492&fid=tp-14
http://www.jpm.gov.my/post/modules/pajpm/vbulletin.php?page=19&bulletin_id=150
http://www.nst.com.my/streets/central/driving-through-zebra-crossings-1.67695
Sources : Elevated BRT Sunway Line, 2012
Bus Rapid Transit Design Guidelines via transit sustainability policies
THAMIZH ARASAN &VEDAGIRI- Modelling Modal Shift from Personal Vehicles to Bus on Introduction ofBus Priority
Measure.
K.Fedra-Sustainable Urban Transportation:A model-based approach.
Masanobu &Hanaoka: COMPARISON OF SUSTAINABILITY BETWEEN
PRIVATE AND PUBLIC TRANSPORT CONSIDERING URBAN STRUCTURE-2003
Parsons Brincker- Improving The Pedestrian Environment
Nikki Laffel- Promoting Public Transportation for Sustainable Development,May 2006
NPTEL-Role of transportation in society-May 2004
Reid Ewig-Pedestrian And Transit Friendly Design
Hiroya Fujimoto-The Modal Shift to Environmentally Sustainble Transport prospects of Urban Transport Systems:
LRT,BRT and Buses.