SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 37
Evaluating Information Tomado de  Teaching and Marketing Electronic Information Programs , 2003 . Doanld A. Barclay Shades of Gray
Evaluating Information ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Scholarly Information ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Scholarly Non Scholarly
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Scholarly Non Scholarly
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Scholarly Non Scholarly
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Scholarly Non Scholarly
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Scholarly Non Scholarly
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Scholarly Non Scholarly
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Scholarly Non Scholarly
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Scholarly Non Scholarly
Scholar reads journal article. Gets idea for conducting original research. Scholar conducts a literature review. Scholar forms a hypothesis, develops a research methodology, and conducts research. Scholar writes up results of research as an article. Scholar submits manuscript of article to editor of scholarly journal. Editor sends copies of manuscript to peer reviewers. Peer reviewers recommend publication upon revision. Editor sends manuscript to scholar with peer reviewers’ anonymous comments. Scholar revises manuscript and  re-submits to editor. Revised manuscript is accepted and (eventually) published in the journal. The Scholarly  Publication Process
Scholarly Journals Versus Popular Magazines ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Identifying Scholarly Journals ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Identifying Scholarly Journals ,[object Object],Athletic Physical Therapy Publication of the Canadian Association of Sports Physical Therapists
Identifying Scholarly Journals ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Identifying Scholarly Journals ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Identifying Scholarly Journals ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Is print information always more  credible than Web Information? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Logical Fallacies ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Authority Fallacies ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Fallacy: Findings Based on Anecdotal Evidence or Small Samples ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Fallacy: Incomplete Information ,[object Object],[object Object]
Fallacy: Selective Bibliography ,[object Object],[object Object]
Fallacy: Personal Attacks or Prejudicial Language ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Fallacy: Flat-Line Projections ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Fallacy: No Areas of Uncertainty ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Fallacy: False Dilemma ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Fallacy: Arguments from Ignorance ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Fallacy: Faulty If/Then Reasoning ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Casual Fallacies ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Other Casual Fallacies: ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Fallacy: Unrelated Points ,[object Object],[object Object]
Primary Versus Secondary Sources of Information  ,[object Object],[object Object]
Primary/Secondary Example ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Typical  primary sources  include: Typical  secondary sources  include:
A Source May Be Both Primary And Secondary ,[object Object],[object Object]

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente

Predatory Journals
Predatory JournalsPredatory Journals
Predatory JournalsRoger Watson
 
Selecting journal a432e23ceb6d454de29468d66c466458
Selecting journal a432e23ceb6d454de29468d66c466458Selecting journal a432e23ceb6d454de29468d66c466458
Selecting journal a432e23ceb6d454de29468d66c466458Kæsy Chaudhari
 
Informative speeches 2nd sem rev3 9 12
Informative speeches 2nd sem rev3 9 12Informative speeches 2nd sem rev3 9 12
Informative speeches 2nd sem rev3 9 12Ms. D
 
Responsibly epidemiological
Responsibly epidemiologicalResponsibly epidemiological
Responsibly epidemiologicalJames Coyne
 
Research misconduct: science's self-administered poison
Research misconduct: science's self-administered poisonResearch misconduct: science's self-administered poison
Research misconduct: science's self-administered poisonLeonid Schneider
 
Twitter 101 Signing up: A Tutorial for Oncologists
Twitter 101  Signing up: A Tutorial for OncologistsTwitter 101  Signing up: A Tutorial for Oncologists
Twitter 101 Signing up: A Tutorial for OncologistsMatthew Katz
 

La actualidad más candente (9)

Research Methodology-03: Plagiarism
Research Methodology-03: PlagiarismResearch Methodology-03: Plagiarism
Research Methodology-03: Plagiarism
 
Predatory Journals
Predatory JournalsPredatory Journals
Predatory Journals
 
Selecting journal a432e23ceb6d454de29468d66c466458
Selecting journal a432e23ceb6d454de29468d66c466458Selecting journal a432e23ceb6d454de29468d66c466458
Selecting journal a432e23ceb6d454de29468d66c466458
 
Informative speeches 2nd sem rev3 9 12
Informative speeches 2nd sem rev3 9 12Informative speeches 2nd sem rev3 9 12
Informative speeches 2nd sem rev3 9 12
 
Responsibly epidemiological
Responsibly epidemiologicalResponsibly epidemiological
Responsibly epidemiological
 
Twitter as a Research Megaphone
Twitter as a Research MegaphoneTwitter as a Research Megaphone
Twitter as a Research Megaphone
 
Research misconduct: science's self-administered poison
Research misconduct: science's self-administered poisonResearch misconduct: science's self-administered poison
Research misconduct: science's self-administered poison
 
Twitter 101 Signing up: A Tutorial for Oncologists
Twitter 101  Signing up: A Tutorial for OncologistsTwitter 101  Signing up: A Tutorial for Oncologists
Twitter 101 Signing up: A Tutorial for Oncologists
 
Finding Sources
Finding SourcesFinding Sources
Finding Sources
 

Destacado

Cambios en el formato de APA 2009
Cambios en el formato de APA 2009Cambios en el formato de APA 2009
Cambios en el formato de APA 2009bibliotecaag
 
Estrategies for Evaluating Information
Estrategies for Evaluating InformationEstrategies for Evaluating Information
Estrategies for Evaluating Informationbibliotecaag
 
Aspectos Generales Sobre El Uso Del
Aspectos  Generales Sobre El Uso DelAspectos  Generales Sobre El Uso Del
Aspectos Generales Sobre El Uso Delbibliotecaag
 
Cambios en el formato de apa 2009
Cambios en el formato de apa 2009Cambios en el formato de apa 2009
Cambios en el formato de apa 2009bibliotecaag
 
Aspectos Generales Sobre El Uso Del
Aspectos Generales Sobre El Uso DelAspectos Generales Sobre El Uso Del
Aspectos Generales Sobre El Uso Delbibliotecaag
 
Presentación del manual de estilo ACS
Presentación del manual de estilo ACSPresentación del manual de estilo ACS
Presentación del manual de estilo ACSbibliotecaag
 
Presentación del manual de estilo ACS
Presentación del manual de estilo ACSPresentación del manual de estilo ACS
Presentación del manual de estilo ACSbibliotecaag
 

Destacado (7)

Cambios en el formato de APA 2009
Cambios en el formato de APA 2009Cambios en el formato de APA 2009
Cambios en el formato de APA 2009
 
Estrategies for Evaluating Information
Estrategies for Evaluating InformationEstrategies for Evaluating Information
Estrategies for Evaluating Information
 
Aspectos Generales Sobre El Uso Del
Aspectos  Generales Sobre El Uso DelAspectos  Generales Sobre El Uso Del
Aspectos Generales Sobre El Uso Del
 
Cambios en el formato de apa 2009
Cambios en el formato de apa 2009Cambios en el formato de apa 2009
Cambios en el formato de apa 2009
 
Aspectos Generales Sobre El Uso Del
Aspectos Generales Sobre El Uso DelAspectos Generales Sobre El Uso Del
Aspectos Generales Sobre El Uso Del
 
Presentación del manual de estilo ACS
Presentación del manual de estilo ACSPresentación del manual de estilo ACS
Presentación del manual de estilo ACS
 
Presentación del manual de estilo ACS
Presentación del manual de estilo ACSPresentación del manual de estilo ACS
Presentación del manual de estilo ACS
 

Similar a Evaluating Information

Covering Medical Studies: How Not to Get It Wrong
Covering Medical Studies: How Not to Get It WrongCovering Medical Studies: How Not to Get It Wrong
Covering Medical Studies: How Not to Get It WrongIvan Oransky
 
Fixing Scholarly Publishing (Cologne 6.4.2018)
Fixing Scholarly Publishing (Cologne 6.4.2018)Fixing Scholarly Publishing (Cologne 6.4.2018)
Fixing Scholarly Publishing (Cologne 6.4.2018)Leonid Schneider
 
The scandal of the £5m PACE chronic fatigue trial
The scandal of the £5m PACE chronic fatigue trialThe scandal of the £5m PACE chronic fatigue trial
The scandal of the £5m PACE chronic fatigue trialJames Coyne
 
Advice to junior researchers: High or low road to success?
Advice to junior researchers: High or low road to success?Advice to junior researchers: High or low road to success?
Advice to junior researchers: High or low road to success?James Coyne
 
Fraud and Why Studies are Flawed: Should Journalists Trust Peer Review?
Fraud and Why Studies are Flawed: Should Journalists Trust Peer Review? Fraud and Why Studies are Flawed: Should Journalists Trust Peer Review?
Fraud and Why Studies are Flawed: Should Journalists Trust Peer Review? Ivan Oransky
 
Evaluating medical evidence for journalists
Evaluating medical evidence for journalistsEvaluating medical evidence for journalists
Evaluating medical evidence for journalistsIvan Oransky
 
Finding credible health information online
Finding credible health information onlineFinding credible health information online
Finding credible health information onlineLindaP_MD
 
Introduction to Information Literacy for the Health Sciences Student
Introduction to Information Literacy for the Health Sciences StudentIntroduction to Information Literacy for the Health Sciences Student
Introduction to Information Literacy for the Health Sciences Studentmputerba
 
Research Fundamentals for Activists
Research Fundamentals for ActivistsResearch Fundamentals for Activists
Research Fundamentals for ActivistsHopkinsCFAR
 
How anonymous post-publication peer review uncovers bad science
How anonymous post-publication peer review uncovers bad scienceHow anonymous post-publication peer review uncovers bad science
How anonymous post-publication peer review uncovers bad scienceLeonid Schneider
 
Vaccine Policy Advocacy, Journalism & Social Media Engagement
Vaccine Policy Advocacy, Journalism & Social Media EngagementVaccine Policy Advocacy, Journalism & Social Media Engagement
Vaccine Policy Advocacy, Journalism & Social Media EngagementTara Haelle
 
Introduction
IntroductionIntroduction
Introductionmputerba
 
Trex motz young
Trex motz youngTrex motz young
Trex motz youngTraciwm
 
Mr. Beridon received your requests for information and returned .docx
Mr. Beridon received your requests for information and returned .docxMr. Beridon received your requests for information and returned .docx
Mr. Beridon received your requests for information and returned .docxroushhsiu
 

Similar a Evaluating Information (18)

Covering Medical Studies: How Not to Get It Wrong
Covering Medical Studies: How Not to Get It WrongCovering Medical Studies: How Not to Get It Wrong
Covering Medical Studies: How Not to Get It Wrong
 
Fixing Scholarly Publishing (Cologne 6.4.2018)
Fixing Scholarly Publishing (Cologne 6.4.2018)Fixing Scholarly Publishing (Cologne 6.4.2018)
Fixing Scholarly Publishing (Cologne 6.4.2018)
 
The scandal of the £5m PACE chronic fatigue trial
The scandal of the £5m PACE chronic fatigue trialThe scandal of the £5m PACE chronic fatigue trial
The scandal of the £5m PACE chronic fatigue trial
 
Advice to junior researchers: High or low road to success?
Advice to junior researchers: High or low road to success?Advice to junior researchers: High or low road to success?
Advice to junior researchers: High or low road to success?
 
Fraud and Why Studies are Flawed: Should Journalists Trust Peer Review?
Fraud and Why Studies are Flawed: Should Journalists Trust Peer Review? Fraud and Why Studies are Flawed: Should Journalists Trust Peer Review?
Fraud and Why Studies are Flawed: Should Journalists Trust Peer Review?
 
Evaluating medical evidence for journalists
Evaluating medical evidence for journalistsEvaluating medical evidence for journalists
Evaluating medical evidence for journalists
 
Enc 1102 may 21
Enc 1102 may 21Enc 1102 may 21
Enc 1102 may 21
 
Finding credible health information online
Finding credible health information onlineFinding credible health information online
Finding credible health information online
 
Introduction to Information Literacy for the Health Sciences Student
Introduction to Information Literacy for the Health Sciences StudentIntroduction to Information Literacy for the Health Sciences Student
Introduction to Information Literacy for the Health Sciences Student
 
Propaganda techniques overgeneralizing lesson by Dean Berry
Propaganda techniques  overgeneralizing lesson by Dean BerryPropaganda techniques  overgeneralizing lesson by Dean Berry
Propaganda techniques overgeneralizing lesson by Dean Berry
 
Research Fundamentals for Activists
Research Fundamentals for ActivistsResearch Fundamentals for Activists
Research Fundamentals for Activists
 
How anonymous post-publication peer review uncovers bad science
How anonymous post-publication peer review uncovers bad scienceHow anonymous post-publication peer review uncovers bad science
How anonymous post-publication peer review uncovers bad science
 
Vaccine Policy Advocacy, Journalism & Social Media Engagement
Vaccine Policy Advocacy, Journalism & Social Media EngagementVaccine Policy Advocacy, Journalism & Social Media Engagement
Vaccine Policy Advocacy, Journalism & Social Media Engagement
 
Introduction
IntroductionIntroduction
Introduction
 
Academia
AcademiaAcademia
Academia
 
Trex motz young
Trex motz youngTrex motz young
Trex motz young
 
Publication ethics
Publication ethics Publication ethics
Publication ethics
 
Mr. Beridon received your requests for information and returned .docx
Mr. Beridon received your requests for information and returned .docxMr. Beridon received your requests for information and returned .docx
Mr. Beridon received your requests for information and returned .docx
 

Más de bibliotecaag

Introducción a las Bases de Datos
Introducción a las Bases de Datos Introducción a las Bases de Datos
Introducción a las Bases de Datos bibliotecaag
 
Aspectos Generales Sobre El Uso Del
Aspectos Generales Sobre El Uso DelAspectos Generales Sobre El Uso Del
Aspectos Generales Sobre El Uso Delbibliotecaag
 
Uso del Catálogo en Línea
Uso del Catálogo en LíneaUso del Catálogo en Línea
Uso del Catálogo en Líneabibliotecaag
 
Ley de Derecho de Autor (Copyright) y el Plagio
Ley de Derecho de Autor (Copyright) y el PlagioLey de Derecho de Autor (Copyright) y el Plagio
Ley de Derecho de Autor (Copyright) y el Plagiobibliotecaag
 
Criterios para Evaluar Fuentes de Información Provenientes de Internet
Criterios para Evaluar Fuentes de Información Provenientes de InternetCriterios para Evaluar Fuentes de Información Provenientes de Internet
Criterios para Evaluar Fuentes de Información Provenientes de Internetbibliotecaag
 
Pesentacion Sobre Aguadilla
Pesentacion Sobre AguadillaPesentacion Sobre Aguadilla
Pesentacion Sobre Aguadillabibliotecaag
 
Cómo Acceso A Las Bases De Datos
Cómo Acceso A Las Bases De DatosCómo Acceso A Las Bases De Datos
Cómo Acceso A Las Bases De Datosbibliotecaag
 
Como Accedo A La Reserva Electrónica
Como Accedo A La Reserva ElectrónicaComo Accedo A La Reserva Electrónica
Como Accedo A La Reserva Electrónicabibliotecaag
 

Más de bibliotecaag (8)

Introducción a las Bases de Datos
Introducción a las Bases de Datos Introducción a las Bases de Datos
Introducción a las Bases de Datos
 
Aspectos Generales Sobre El Uso Del
Aspectos Generales Sobre El Uso DelAspectos Generales Sobre El Uso Del
Aspectos Generales Sobre El Uso Del
 
Uso del Catálogo en Línea
Uso del Catálogo en LíneaUso del Catálogo en Línea
Uso del Catálogo en Línea
 
Ley de Derecho de Autor (Copyright) y el Plagio
Ley de Derecho de Autor (Copyright) y el PlagioLey de Derecho de Autor (Copyright) y el Plagio
Ley de Derecho de Autor (Copyright) y el Plagio
 
Criterios para Evaluar Fuentes de Información Provenientes de Internet
Criterios para Evaluar Fuentes de Información Provenientes de InternetCriterios para Evaluar Fuentes de Información Provenientes de Internet
Criterios para Evaluar Fuentes de Información Provenientes de Internet
 
Pesentacion Sobre Aguadilla
Pesentacion Sobre AguadillaPesentacion Sobre Aguadilla
Pesentacion Sobre Aguadilla
 
Cómo Acceso A Las Bases De Datos
Cómo Acceso A Las Bases De DatosCómo Acceso A Las Bases De Datos
Cómo Acceso A Las Bases De Datos
 
Como Accedo A La Reserva Electrónica
Como Accedo A La Reserva ElectrónicaComo Accedo A La Reserva Electrónica
Como Accedo A La Reserva Electrónica
 

Evaluating Information

  • 1. Evaluating Information Tomado de Teaching and Marketing Electronic Information Programs , 2003 . Doanld A. Barclay Shades of Gray
  • 2.
  • 3.
  • 4.
  • 5.
  • 6.
  • 7.
  • 8.
  • 9.
  • 10.
  • 11.
  • 12. Scholar reads journal article. Gets idea for conducting original research. Scholar conducts a literature review. Scholar forms a hypothesis, develops a research methodology, and conducts research. Scholar writes up results of research as an article. Scholar submits manuscript of article to editor of scholarly journal. Editor sends copies of manuscript to peer reviewers. Peer reviewers recommend publication upon revision. Editor sends manuscript to scholar with peer reviewers’ anonymous comments. Scholar revises manuscript and re-submits to editor. Revised manuscript is accepted and (eventually) published in the journal. The Scholarly Publication Process
  • 13.
  • 14.
  • 15.
  • 16.
  • 17.
  • 18.
  • 19.
  • 20.
  • 21.
  • 22.
  • 23.
  • 24.
  • 25.
  • 26.
  • 27.
  • 28.
  • 29.
  • 30.
  • 31.
  • 32.
  • 33.
  • 34.
  • 35.
  • 36.
  • 37.