SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 14
Some determinants
of urinary tract infection in children
   from 2 months to 6 years old
   In hai phong vietnam In 2008


                      Dang Van Chuc
                    Nguyen Ngoc Sang
                     Dang Viet Linh
1. introduction

• Urinary Tract Infection (UTI):
  - Renal Scarring=> anemia, hypertention (7-17%),
preclampsia, clampsia, renal failure and ended stage
  renal diseases.
  - Hospital based studies.
  - Limited community based studies
 Objective:
    To determine some risk factors of UTI in children
  from 2 month to 6 years old at some areas of Hai
  Phong.
2. Population and method

2.1. Population and research time.
- All children from 2 months to 6 years old at some areas of H
- Research time: 7/2006-10/2008.
-UTI criteria: Leucocyturia ≥ 30/mm3 and bacteriuria ≥ 105/m
2.2. Method
- Research area: 3 counties/districts representative of rural, u
coastal of HP.
- Study design: Descriptive and Cross-sectional study.
- Sample size: using the following formula:
2         p1  p
                n     Z 1    / 2
                                    d2

n: Sample Size
Z21-α/2 = (1,96)2 (Confidence degree 95%)
p = 0,04 (UTI incidence in children of HP in a commune from
Nguyen Ngoc Sang et al in 2005)
d: Expected accuracy = 20% of p
Applying to this formula , it needs about 4610 children for the study.
-Sampling procedure: Multistage sampling.
3 county/districts: Kien An (urban), Kien Thuy (coastal) and Thuy Ng
 9 cummunes: Nam son, Trang Minh and Van au (Kien An), ai Ha, T
and Ngu oan(Kien Thuy), Phuc Le, Lap Le and Pha Le (Thuy Nguyen
- Data collection:
+ Determing UTI:
Clean morning midstream urine samples were used to scr
for urinary tract infection.
UTI was defined when having both
bacteriuria ≥105/ml and Leucocyturia ≥ 30/mm3.
+ Children’ parent interview:
On socio-economic conditions, children’s diseases and
history of children’diseases.
+ Physical examination:
Pediatricians directly examined children to find out childre
diseases then weigh and measure to estimate their nutritio
status.
Data analysis:
     Using Epi-Info and SPSS version 13.0 to enter
and analyse data, calculate UTI incidence and determ
risk factors.
Dependent variables: 128 UTI cases, independent va
socio-economic and children’s diseases.
Risk factor: OR>1, 95% IC includes OR.
Multivariable analysis by using Logistics Regression
3. results


3.1. Common information on children:
-There were 4631 children screened among them
boys were 2268 (49%); girls 2363 (51%);
rural children 1603 (34,6%); coastal children 1568
(33,9%); urban children 1460 (31,5%).
-128 children had both leucocyturia and bacteriuri
UTI incidence was 2.8%.
3.2. Some determinants of UTI:
 Table 1. The relationship of socio-economic condition and UTI.

                                                    OR                  OR
  Risk                                     Rate      Bi                 Multi
                   Exposure           n                      95%CI               95%CI
 factors                                    %     variable             variabl
                                                      s                  es
Maternal    < secondary*             105   3.1
                                                    1.7      1.1-2.7
education   ≥ secondary              23    1.8
Paternal    < secondary *            109   3.3
                                                    2.2      1.3-3.7
education   ≥ secondary              19    1.5
            Poverty*                 29    5.8
Economy                                             2.5      1.6-3.8    2.9      1.3-6.5
            Non poverty              99    2.4
            Unsafe water             31    2.6
Water                                               0.9      0.6-1.3
            Safe water               97    2.8
Ware of     Unware of UTI            115   2.8
                                                    1.2      0.7-2.2
UTI         Ware                     13    2.3
Paternal    Indirect paternal care
                                     84    3.6
care of     of child*                               1.9      1.3-2.8
child       Direct care              44    1.9
3.2. Some determinants of UTI:
 Table 2. The relationship of socio-economic condition and UTI (continu

                                             OR               OR
  Risk                              Rate      Bi             Multi
               Exposure        n                    95%CI              95%CI
 factors                             %     variable         variable
                                              s                s

Maternal   Indirect maternal
                               71   3.9             1.4-
care of    care of child*                   1.9
                                                    2.8
child      Direct care         57   2.0
           Stable              73   2.5             0.5-
House                                       0.7
           Unatable            55   3.3             1.1

           Unhygienic
                               58   2.3             0.4-
Lavatory   lavatory                         0.65
                                                    0.9
           Hygienic lavatory   70   3.4

House’s    < 20 m2             98   2.5             0.3-
                                            0.5
square     ≥ 20 m2             30   4.3             0.8
3.2. Some determinants of UTI:
 Table 3. The relationship of hygienic factors and UTI.

                                       OR
                                                       OR
  Risk                          Rate    Bi                    95%C
             Exposure     n                   95%CI   Multi
 factors                         %   variable                   I
                                                    variables
                                        s

Hygiene     Clean*       102     3.3
                                                  1.3-
after                                    1.9
             Clean and                            3.0
urination                 26     1.8
              washing
            Yes*          23     5.8
                                                  1.5-
Diaper                                   2.4
                                                  3.8
            No           105     2.5

Hygiene     Clean *       99     3.2
                                                  1.1-
after                                    1.7
            Clean and                             2.6
stool                     29     1.9
            washing
3.2. Some determinants of UTI:
 Table 4. The relationship of hygienic factors and UTI (continued).

                                             OR             OR
  Risk                              Rate      Bi      95%  Multi   95%C
              Exposure         n
 factors                             %     variable    CI variable   I
                                               s              s
            Posterio-
                              123   2.9
Way of      anterior*
                                                      1.1-            1.2-
washing     Anterio-                         2.6             1.9
                                                      6.3             3.9
after stool posterior,   in    5    1.2
            place

Kinder-     Yes               94    2.6               0.5-
                                             0.9
garten                                                1.1
            No                34    3.3

            Yes               16    2.5
                                                      0.5-
Preschool                                    0.8
                                                      1.4
            No                112   2.8
3.2. Some determinants of UTI:
  Table 5. The relationship of children’s diseases and UTI.

                                                             OR
                                            OR
                Exposur          Rate                       Multi   95%C
 Risk factors              n                 Bi      95%CI
                   e              %                        variable   I
                                         variables
                                                              s
                Yes *      49     3.5
Stunting                                   1.4       1.0-2.1
                No         79     2.4
                Yes *      41     4.0                                1.1-
Low weight                                 1.6       1.1-2.4   1.7
                No         87     2.4                                3.3
                Yes *      26     4.7
Wasting                                    1.97      1.3-3.3
                No        102     2.5
                Yes *      30     6.6                 3.7-           3.7-
Phimosis                                   6.6                 6.7
                No         19     1.0                 11.9           12.2
                Yes *      44     4.6
Constipation                               2.0       1.4-2.9
                No         84     2.3
                Yes *      81     3.3
Enuresis                                   1.5       1.1-2.3
                No         45     2.1
4. conclusion



- Family poverty
- Low weight malnutrition
- Phimosis in boys
- Parental Incorrect washing method for their child
Determinants of UTI in Vietnamese Children

Más contenido relacionado

Más de BinhThang

Epidata v2.1
Epidata v2.1Epidata v2.1
Epidata v2.1BinhThang
 
Y te cong cong la gi
Y te cong cong la giY te cong cong la gi
Y te cong cong la giBinhThang
 
Chien luoc dan so 2011 2020 - ytecongcong.com
Chien luoc dan so 2011 2020 - ytecongcong.comChien luoc dan so 2011 2020 - ytecongcong.com
Chien luoc dan so 2011 2020 - ytecongcong.comBinhThang
 
Chien luoc dan so 2011 2020 - ytecongcong.com
Chien luoc dan so 2011 2020 - ytecongcong.comChien luoc dan so 2011 2020 - ytecongcong.com
Chien luoc dan so 2011 2020 - ytecongcong.comBinhThang
 
Programme of the 2nd international conference on public health
Programme of the 2nd international conference on public healthProgramme of the 2nd international conference on public health
Programme of the 2nd international conference on public healthBinhThang
 
Presentation mekong conference
Presentation mekong conferencePresentation mekong conference
Presentation mekong conferenceBinhThang
 
19. nguyen hoang lan
19. nguyen hoang lan19. nguyen hoang lan
19. nguyen hoang lanBinhThang
 
18. truong cong dat presentation
18. truong cong dat presentation18. truong cong dat presentation
18. truong cong dat presentationBinhThang
 
17. chris doran ace alcohol vine presentation
17. chris doran ace alcohol vine presentation17. chris doran ace alcohol vine presentation
17. chris doran ace alcohol vine presentationBinhThang
 
17. chris doran
17. chris doran17. chris doran
17. chris doranBinhThang
 
16. hoang khanh chi
16. hoang khanh chi16. hoang khanh chi
16. hoang khanh chiBinhThang
 
15. tran kim phung
15. tran kim phung15. tran kim phung
15. tran kim phungBinhThang
 
14. douangphachanh xaysomphou
14. douangphachanh xaysomphou14. douangphachanh xaysomphou
14. douangphachanh xaysomphouBinhThang
 
13. nguyen phuong lan
13. nguyen phuong lan13. nguyen phuong lan
13. nguyen phuong lanBinhThang
 
12. michael dunne
12. michael dunne12. michael dunne
12. michael dunneBinhThang
 
11. cao my phuong risk factors of pre diabetes in adults aged 45
11. cao my phuong risk factors of pre diabetes in adults aged 4511. cao my phuong risk factors of pre diabetes in adults aged 45
11. cao my phuong risk factors of pre diabetes in adults aged 45BinhThang
 
10. doan vuong diem khanh
10. doan vuong diem khanh10. doan vuong diem khanh
10. doan vuong diem khanhBinhThang
 
9. peter hill
9. peter hill9. peter hill
9. peter hillBinhThang
 
8. nguyen van hai
8. nguyen van hai8. nguyen van hai
8. nguyen van haiBinhThang
 
7. nguyen dinh tung
7. nguyen dinh tung7. nguyen dinh tung
7. nguyen dinh tungBinhThang
 

Más de BinhThang (20)

Epidata v2.1
Epidata v2.1Epidata v2.1
Epidata v2.1
 
Y te cong cong la gi
Y te cong cong la giY te cong cong la gi
Y te cong cong la gi
 
Chien luoc dan so 2011 2020 - ytecongcong.com
Chien luoc dan so 2011 2020 - ytecongcong.comChien luoc dan so 2011 2020 - ytecongcong.com
Chien luoc dan so 2011 2020 - ytecongcong.com
 
Chien luoc dan so 2011 2020 - ytecongcong.com
Chien luoc dan so 2011 2020 - ytecongcong.comChien luoc dan so 2011 2020 - ytecongcong.com
Chien luoc dan so 2011 2020 - ytecongcong.com
 
Programme of the 2nd international conference on public health
Programme of the 2nd international conference on public healthProgramme of the 2nd international conference on public health
Programme of the 2nd international conference on public health
 
Presentation mekong conference
Presentation mekong conferencePresentation mekong conference
Presentation mekong conference
 
19. nguyen hoang lan
19. nguyen hoang lan19. nguyen hoang lan
19. nguyen hoang lan
 
18. truong cong dat presentation
18. truong cong dat presentation18. truong cong dat presentation
18. truong cong dat presentation
 
17. chris doran ace alcohol vine presentation
17. chris doran ace alcohol vine presentation17. chris doran ace alcohol vine presentation
17. chris doran ace alcohol vine presentation
 
17. chris doran
17. chris doran17. chris doran
17. chris doran
 
16. hoang khanh chi
16. hoang khanh chi16. hoang khanh chi
16. hoang khanh chi
 
15. tran kim phung
15. tran kim phung15. tran kim phung
15. tran kim phung
 
14. douangphachanh xaysomphou
14. douangphachanh xaysomphou14. douangphachanh xaysomphou
14. douangphachanh xaysomphou
 
13. nguyen phuong lan
13. nguyen phuong lan13. nguyen phuong lan
13. nguyen phuong lan
 
12. michael dunne
12. michael dunne12. michael dunne
12. michael dunne
 
11. cao my phuong risk factors of pre diabetes in adults aged 45
11. cao my phuong risk factors of pre diabetes in adults aged 4511. cao my phuong risk factors of pre diabetes in adults aged 45
11. cao my phuong risk factors of pre diabetes in adults aged 45
 
10. doan vuong diem khanh
10. doan vuong diem khanh10. doan vuong diem khanh
10. doan vuong diem khanh
 
9. peter hill
9. peter hill9. peter hill
9. peter hill
 
8. nguyen van hai
8. nguyen van hai8. nguyen van hai
8. nguyen van hai
 
7. nguyen dinh tung
7. nguyen dinh tung7. nguyen dinh tung
7. nguyen dinh tung
 

Determinants of UTI in Vietnamese Children

  • 1. Some determinants of urinary tract infection in children from 2 months to 6 years old In hai phong vietnam In 2008 Dang Van Chuc Nguyen Ngoc Sang Dang Viet Linh
  • 2. 1. introduction • Urinary Tract Infection (UTI): - Renal Scarring=> anemia, hypertention (7-17%), preclampsia, clampsia, renal failure and ended stage renal diseases. - Hospital based studies. - Limited community based studies Objective: To determine some risk factors of UTI in children from 2 month to 6 years old at some areas of Hai Phong.
  • 3. 2. Population and method 2.1. Population and research time. - All children from 2 months to 6 years old at some areas of H - Research time: 7/2006-10/2008. -UTI criteria: Leucocyturia ≥ 30/mm3 and bacteriuria ≥ 105/m 2.2. Method - Research area: 3 counties/districts representative of rural, u coastal of HP. - Study design: Descriptive and Cross-sectional study. - Sample size: using the following formula:
  • 4. 2 p1 p n Z 1 / 2 d2 n: Sample Size Z21-α/2 = (1,96)2 (Confidence degree 95%) p = 0,04 (UTI incidence in children of HP in a commune from Nguyen Ngoc Sang et al in 2005) d: Expected accuracy = 20% of p Applying to this formula , it needs about 4610 children for the study. -Sampling procedure: Multistage sampling. 3 county/districts: Kien An (urban), Kien Thuy (coastal) and Thuy Ng 9 cummunes: Nam son, Trang Minh and Van au (Kien An), ai Ha, T and Ngu oan(Kien Thuy), Phuc Le, Lap Le and Pha Le (Thuy Nguyen
  • 5. - Data collection: + Determing UTI: Clean morning midstream urine samples were used to scr for urinary tract infection. UTI was defined when having both bacteriuria ≥105/ml and Leucocyturia ≥ 30/mm3. + Children’ parent interview: On socio-economic conditions, children’s diseases and history of children’diseases. + Physical examination: Pediatricians directly examined children to find out childre diseases then weigh and measure to estimate their nutritio status.
  • 6. Data analysis: Using Epi-Info and SPSS version 13.0 to enter and analyse data, calculate UTI incidence and determ risk factors. Dependent variables: 128 UTI cases, independent va socio-economic and children’s diseases. Risk factor: OR>1, 95% IC includes OR. Multivariable analysis by using Logistics Regression
  • 7. 3. results 3.1. Common information on children: -There were 4631 children screened among them boys were 2268 (49%); girls 2363 (51%); rural children 1603 (34,6%); coastal children 1568 (33,9%); urban children 1460 (31,5%). -128 children had both leucocyturia and bacteriuri UTI incidence was 2.8%.
  • 8. 3.2. Some determinants of UTI: Table 1. The relationship of socio-economic condition and UTI. OR OR Risk Rate Bi Multi Exposure n 95%CI 95%CI factors % variable variabl s es Maternal < secondary* 105 3.1 1.7 1.1-2.7 education ≥ secondary 23 1.8 Paternal < secondary * 109 3.3 2.2 1.3-3.7 education ≥ secondary 19 1.5 Poverty* 29 5.8 Economy 2.5 1.6-3.8 2.9 1.3-6.5 Non poverty 99 2.4 Unsafe water 31 2.6 Water 0.9 0.6-1.3 Safe water 97 2.8 Ware of Unware of UTI 115 2.8 1.2 0.7-2.2 UTI Ware 13 2.3 Paternal Indirect paternal care 84 3.6 care of of child* 1.9 1.3-2.8 child Direct care 44 1.9
  • 9. 3.2. Some determinants of UTI: Table 2. The relationship of socio-economic condition and UTI (continu OR OR Risk Rate Bi Multi Exposure n 95%CI 95%CI factors % variable variable s s Maternal Indirect maternal 71 3.9 1.4- care of care of child* 1.9 2.8 child Direct care 57 2.0 Stable 73 2.5 0.5- House 0.7 Unatable 55 3.3 1.1 Unhygienic 58 2.3 0.4- Lavatory lavatory 0.65 0.9 Hygienic lavatory 70 3.4 House’s < 20 m2 98 2.5 0.3- 0.5 square ≥ 20 m2 30 4.3 0.8
  • 10. 3.2. Some determinants of UTI: Table 3. The relationship of hygienic factors and UTI. OR OR Risk Rate Bi 95%C Exposure n 95%CI Multi factors % variable I variables s Hygiene Clean* 102 3.3 1.3- after 1.9 Clean and 3.0 urination 26 1.8 washing Yes* 23 5.8 1.5- Diaper 2.4 3.8 No 105 2.5 Hygiene Clean * 99 3.2 1.1- after 1.7 Clean and 2.6 stool 29 1.9 washing
  • 11. 3.2. Some determinants of UTI: Table 4. The relationship of hygienic factors and UTI (continued). OR OR Risk Rate Bi 95% Multi 95%C Exposure n factors % variable CI variable I s s Posterio- 123 2.9 Way of anterior* 1.1- 1.2- washing Anterio- 2.6 1.9 6.3 3.9 after stool posterior, in 5 1.2 place Kinder- Yes 94 2.6 0.5- 0.9 garten 1.1 No 34 3.3 Yes 16 2.5 0.5- Preschool 0.8 1.4 No 112 2.8
  • 12. 3.2. Some determinants of UTI: Table 5. The relationship of children’s diseases and UTI. OR OR Exposur Rate Multi 95%C Risk factors n Bi 95%CI e % variable I variables s Yes * 49 3.5 Stunting 1.4 1.0-2.1 No 79 2.4 Yes * 41 4.0 1.1- Low weight 1.6 1.1-2.4 1.7 No 87 2.4 3.3 Yes * 26 4.7 Wasting 1.97 1.3-3.3 No 102 2.5 Yes * 30 6.6 3.7- 3.7- Phimosis 6.6 6.7 No 19 1.0 11.9 12.2 Yes * 44 4.6 Constipation 2.0 1.4-2.9 No 84 2.3 Yes * 81 3.3 Enuresis 1.5 1.1-2.3 No 45 2.1
  • 13. 4. conclusion - Family poverty - Low weight malnutrition - Phimosis in boys - Parental Incorrect washing method for their child