2. Goal
1. To understand how mass media talks about the local
education
2. To examine the possible impacts on the ways of
reporting on various actors in the educational system
Mass media
Printed media (e.g., newspapers, magazines)
Electronic media (e.g., TV, radio)
Internet (e.g., YouTube, Xanga, Facebook)
3. What we need to know
Develop an understanding of media
1. What interests media
Issues, crises, problems…
1. What influences media
Government, political parties, pressure/interest groups, business
sector…
1. What is their knowledge level about education
Expertise/professional? Outsiders?
1. What are their sources of information
Information: documents, press release, consultation papers, research
reports, seminars,…
government officers, professionals, front liners, parents, students,…
1. What is the local/global/regional
presence/affiliations/networking of media. E.g.,
PTU = Democratic Party = pan-democratic media (e.g., Apple Daily)
In order to manage perception
4. Media perception
Positive
- students’ results (in the
public exams)
- excellent performance of
stakeholders (in terms of
learning capacity)
- Reforms (strive for
excellence)
Negative
- Misconducts (teachers
/students)
- Poor performance/capacity (e.g.,
zero points of candidates in
public exam, low level of
“language teachers” in the
Language Proficiency
Assessment)
- Deforms (regressive)
- Strives/demonstrations
(undermine the societal interests
and social order)
5. 5
Observation [1]
Politics of scapegoat
The introduction to, and the implementation of the
new policy, is mainly attributed to the erratic and/or
dubious practices of stakeholders. E.g.,
Language Benchmarking Assessment (Language
Proficiency Assessment) maintaining
(questioning?) the language competence of teachers
School-based management school
democratization? Strengthening accountability (but
accountable to whom?)
6. 6
Observation [2]
The nature of the politics of scapegoat:
(1) cover up the covert intentions of the government
(manipulative and hegemonic approach);
(2) influence the public opinion that sides with the official
stance;
(3) aim at the powerless/excluded group (being attacked and
discriminated)
(4) avert the threat to the educational bureaucracy in case of
blunder
15. Reminders for Critical Reading
15
1. Heading (Sub-heading): eye-catching and colorful
remarks/wordings
2. Information
Homogenous or divergent
accurate and updated?
Official or non-official
Using figures or statistics, what purposes?
Using table or point form to summarize/simplify the content, be
accurate or relevant?
1. View
Sole or multiple/different
Objective or subjective/exaggerated/biased
Any sound evidence to support?
16. Reminders for Critical Reading
16
4. Editorial
Affirmation or negativity
4. Commentaries/forums
Affirmation, negativity, or both
4. Illustrations (e.g., political cartoon)
5. If you were an ordinary reader, what do you feel about
the reporting? Do you think such readers are being
affected by the reporting?
17. Media perspective
1. Reflect or distort the public views?
2. The social / cultural reconstruction of reality
3. Serve as a mouthpiece of the public / the government?
4. Professional in reporting and commenting on the critical
educational issues?
Knowledgeable
Objective (avoid misinformation, disinformation and
misinterpretation)
Truth