SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 13
Download to read offline
MAY 7, 2012



Just-in-time Information through
Mobile Connections
86% of smartphone owners used their phone in the past month to make
real-time queries to help them meet friends, solve problems, or settle
arguments


                                                         Lee Rainie
                                                         Director, Pew Internet Project
                                                         Susannah Fox
                                                         Associate Director, Pew Internet Project




Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project
1615 L St., NW – Suite 700
Washington, D.C. 20036
Phone: 202-419-4500


http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Just-in-time.aspx
Summary of Findings
Some 70% of all cell phone owners and 86% of smartphone owners have used their phones in the
previous 30 days to perform at least one of the following activities:

       Coordinate a meeting or get-together -- 41% of cell phone owners have done this in the past 30
        days.

       Solve an unexpected problem that they or someone else had encountered -- 35% have used
        their phones to do this in the past 30 days.

       Decide whether to visit a business, such as a restaurant -- 30% have used their phone to do
        this in the past 30 days.

       Find information to help settle an argument they were having -- 27% have used their phone to
        get information for that reason in the past 30 days.

       Look up a score of a sporting event -- 23% have used their phone to do that in the past 30
        days.

       Get up-to-the-minute traffic or public transit information to find the fastest way to get
        somewhere -- 20% have used their phone to get that kind of information in the past 30 days.

       Get help in an emergency situation -- 19% have used their phone to do that in the past 30 days.

Overall, these “just-in-time” cell users—defined as anyone who has done one or more of the above
activities using their phone in the preceding 30 days—amount to 62% of the entire adult population.

Younger cell phone users are more likely than older users to have performed most of these activities. In
all, 88% of the cell phone owners ages 18-29 had performed one of these activities in the past 30 days,
compared with 76% of the cell owners ages 30-49, 57% of the cell owners ages 50-64, and 46% of the
cell owners age 65 and older.

There are also differences between men and women, parents of minor children and non-parents, and
among whites, African-Americans, and Hispanics on some of these activities. For instance:

       Men who own cells are more likely than women cell owners to have used their phones in the
        past 30 days to look up information that settles an argument or disagreement: 31% of males
        who own cells have done this, compared with 22% of women cell owners.

       White cell phone owners are more likely than minorities to have used their phones to
        coordinate a gathering in the past 30 days. Some 43% of white cell owners have done this,
        compared with 33% of African-Americans who own cells and 34% of Hispanic cell owners.

       African-American cell owners are more likely than whites to have used their phones in the past
        month to get up-to-the-minute traffic or public transit information: 31% vs. 16%.




pewinternet.org                                                                                          2
These just-in-time information searches take place in the wider context of people using their
smartphones to get needed information right away. In this survey, we also asked about using cell
phones to get turn-by-turn navigation or directions while driving. Some 65% of smartphone owners say
they have done that, with 15% doing so on a typical day.

These findings come from a nationally representative survey by the Pew Internet Project conducted
between March 15 and April 3, 2012 among 2,254 adults age 18 and older. The margin of error on the
full sample is 2 percentage points. Some 1,954 cell owners were part of the sample. The margin of error
of questions asked of them is 3 percentage points.




pewinternet.org                                                                                       3
Main Report
The rapid adoption of cell phones and, especially, the spread of internet-connected smartphones are
changing people’s communications with others and their relationships with information. Users’ ability to
access data immediately through apps and web browsers and through contact with their social networks
is creating a new culture of real-time information seekers and problem solvers.

The Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project has documented some of the ways that
people perform just-in-time services with their cell phones. Earlier this year, we reported on the 9% of
adults who sometimes make spur-of-the-moment text donations to charities1. We have also examined
the use of cell phones inside stores during the holiday season, as users consulted friends about
purchases and looked online for price comparisons and reviews about things they were thinking of
buying.2

More recently, a new nationally representative survey by the Pew Internet Project has found additional
evidence of this just-in-time phenomenon. The survey was conducted between March 15 and April 3,
2012 among 2,254 adults age 18 and older and it found that 88% of adults are cell phone owners and
that 46% are smartphone owners. In the section of the survey exploring the just-in-time behaviors of the
cell-using population, respondents were asked if they had used their phone to access different types of
time-sensitive information in the 30 days preceding the survey. Their answers disclosed that:

        41% of cell phone owners used their phone in the previous 30 days to coordinate a meeting or
         get-together.

        35% used their phone to solve an unexpected problem they or someone else had encountered
         in the previous 30 days.

        30% used their phone in the previous 30 days to decide whether to visit a business, such as a
         restaurant

        27% used their phone in the previous 30 days to get information to help settle an argument
         they were having.

        23% used their phone in the previous 30 days to look up a score of a sporting event.

        20% used their phone in the previous 30 days for up-to-the-minute traffic or public transit
         information to find the fastest way to get somewhere.

        19% used their phone to get help in an emergency situation.

In all, 70% of cell phone owners – representing 62% of the entire adult population – have used their
phone in the previous month to do at least one of these real-time searches.


1
  “Real Time Charitable Giving” (Pew Internet: January 12, 2012). Available at:
http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/MobileGiving.aspx
2
  “The rise of in-store mobile commerce” (Pew Internet: January 30, 2012). Available at:
http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/In-store-mobile-commerce.aspx


pewinternet.org                                                                                            4
The demographics of just-in-time phone users
The young, the relatively well-educated and well-off, and parents of minor children are more likely than
other kinds of cell owners to have used their cell phones recently for the just-in-time activities we
measured in this survey.

      A wide range of cell owners use their phones for just-in-time information
      70% of adult cell owners have performed at least one of seven different just-in-time searches Pew
      Internet measured in a survey. This is the % of cell owners in each group who have done at least one
      such search in the preceding 30 days.
                                                                           % who have done at least
                                                                           one of several just-in-time
                                                                            searches in past 30 days
      All adult cell owners (age 18+)                                                   70%
      Men                                                                               73
      Women                                                                             67
      Race/ethnicity
      White, Non-Hispanic                                                               70
      Black, Non-Hispanic                                                                68
      Hispanic (English- and Spanish-speaking)                                          73
      Age
      18-29                                                                             88
      30-49                                                                             76
      50-64                                                                             57
      65+                                                                               46
      Household income
      Less than $30,000/yr                                                              63
      $30,000-$49,999                                                                   67
      $50,000-$74,999                                                                   76
      $75,000+                                                                          81
      Educational attainment
      No high school diploma                                                            64
      High school grad                                                                  64
      Some College                                                                      72
      College +                                                                         78
      Parental status
      Parent of minor child                                                             75
      Non-parent                                                                        68
      Source: Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Mobile Survey, March 15-April 3, 2012. N
      for entire survey = 2,254 respondents age 18 older and N=1,954 for cell owners. Interviews were
      conducted in English and Spanish and on landline and cells.



pewinternet.org                                                                                              5
Younger cell phone users are considerably more likely than older users to have done these kinds of
searches. Overall, 88% of cell phone owners ages 18-29 had performed one or more of these activities in
the past 30 days, compared with 76% of cell owners ages 30-49, 57% of cell owners ages 50-64, and 46%
of the owners age 65 and older.

Young adults are more likely to use their cells for real-time information than
their elders
% of cell owners in each age group who have performed these real-time activities in the previous 30 days


                                         18-29     30-49      50-64      65+

                                                                                                               60%
                             Coordinate a gathering                                               45%
                                                                               27%
                                                                            23%
                                                                                                       49%
                     Solve an unexpected problem                                            39%
                                                                               26%
                                                                      15%
                                                                                                 43%
  Decide whether or not to visit a business, such as                                       37%
                    restaurant                                           18%
                                                                   12%
                                                                                                  45%
          Look up something to settle an argument                                    31%
                                                                      15%
                                                             4%
                                                                                    33%
                               Look up sports score                               29%
                                                                      14%
                                                             5%
                                                                                     31%
  Get up-to-the minute traffic or public transit info                       23%
                                                                   11%
                                                             4%
                                                                          21%
                Get help in an emergency situation                        21%
                                                                        18%
                                                                       16%
                                                        0%   10%      20%      30%     40%        50%        60%   70%


Source: Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Mobile Survey, March 15-April 3, 2012. N for entire survey
= 2,254 respondents age 18 older and N=1,954 for cell owners. Interviews were conducted in English and Spanish
and on landline and cells.

Some 86% of smartphone owners have used their phones for at least one of these purposes, a figure
that is considerably higher than among other cell users —52% of non-smartphone owners have used
their phone for some sort of just-in-time searching in the preceding 30 days. These smartphone owners
are also considerably more likely than other cell users to have done each of the individual activities we
measured in our survey—the only exception is getting help in an emergency situation, as both
smartphone owners and other types of cell owners were equally likely to have used their phone recently
for this purpose.



pewinternet.org                                                                                                          6
Smartphone owners get real-time information
% of cell owners in each group who have performed these real-time activities in the previous 30 days


                                     Smartphone owner         Other cell owners

 60%
                                                                      49%                              50%
 50%                                                   46%                           47%
                                        39%
 40%                     33%                                                                                 32%
 30%
          20% 18%                                                                          22%
 20%
                                                                            10%
 10%                           5%             5%             6%

  0%
        Get help in an Get up-to-the Look up sports    Look up       Decide     Solve an          Coordinate a
         emergency minute traffic        score      something to whether or unexpected             gathering
          situation      or public                    settle an  not to visit a problem
                        transit info                  argument business, such
                                                                 as restaurant


Source: Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Mobile Survey, March 15-April 3, 2012. N for entire survey
= 2,254 respondents age 18 older; N=1,954 for cell owners; N=904 for smartphone owners; N=1,050 for other cell
phone owners. Interviews were conducted in English and Spanish and on landline and cells.

Other demographic differences appear in a least some of these just-in-time searches. For instance:

       Men who own cells are more likely than women cell owners to have used their phones in the
        past 30 days to look for information that settles an argument or disagreement: 31% of males
        who own cells have done this, compared with 22% of women cell owners. In addition, male cell
        owners (31%) are more likely than females (14%) to have used their phones to check on sports
        scores.

        Overall, men who own cells are more likely than women to have used their phone in the past
        month for at least one of these purposes: 73% of men who own cells have done at least one of
        these things, compared with 67% of women.

       Parents of minor children are more likely than non-parents to have done several of these just-in-
        time searches in the past 30 days: Compared with cell owners with no minor children living at
        home, parents who own cell phones are more likely to have used their phones to solve an
        unexpected problem (40% vs. 33%); to have used their phones to decide whether to visit a local
        business (38% vs. 27%); to have looked up something to help settle an argument (32% vs. 24%);
        and to have looked up a sports score (28% vs. 20%).

       White cell phone owners are more likely than minorities to have used their phones to
        coordinate a gathering in the past 30 days. Some 43% of white cell owners have done this,
        compared with 33% of African-Americans who own cells and 34% of Hispanic cell owners. On


pewinternet.org                                                                                                    7
the other hand, African-American cell owners are more likely than whites to have used their
        phones in the past month to get up-to-the-minute traffic or public transit information: 31% vs.
        16%.

       People living in higher income households are more likely than the less well-off to have used
        their cell phones in the past month for these purposes. And people with higher levels of
        education are often more likely than those with lesser levels of education to have used their
        cells for these reasons.

In addition, rural cell users are less likely than suburban and urban users to have done some of the just-
in-time searches in the past month.

Rural residents are less likely than others to use their cells for just-in-time
information
% of cell owners in each group who have performed these real-time activities in the previous 30 days

                                             Urban          Suburban     Rural

                                                                                                                  35%
                     Solve an unexpected problem                                                                    37%
                                                                                                         28%
 Decide whether or not to visit a business, such as                                                            32%
                                                                                                                 34%
                   restaurant                                                        17%
                                                                                                         28%
         Look up something to settle an argument                                                         28%
                                                                                           20%
                                                                                                       26%
                              Look up sports score                                               23%
                                                                                   15%
                                                                                                 23%
 Get up-to-the minute traffic or public transit info                                       20%
                                                                             11%
                                                                                            21%
               Get help in an emergency situation                                          20%
                                                                                   15%

                                                       0%              10%           20%                30%            40%


Source: Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Mobile Survey, March 15-April 3, 2012. N for entire survey
= 2,254 respondents age 18 older; N=1,954 for cell owners; N=904 for smartphone owners; N=1,050 for other cell
phone owners. Interviews were conducted in English and Spanish and on landline and cells.


The just-in-time information searches discussed above are just one way in which cell owners are using
their phones to access detailed information and advanced applications through their mobile devices. We
asked owners of cell phones who get email, have apps, or access the internet on their phones several
questions about their general use of their phones. Some 65% of smartphone owners say they have used
their phone to get turn-by-turn navigation or directions while driving, with 15% doing so on a typical
day.




pewinternet.org                                                                                                              8
About Pew Internet
The Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project is an initiative of the Pew Research Center,
a nonprofit “fact tank” that provides information on the issues, attitudes, and trends shaping America
and the world. The Pew Internet Project explores the impact of the internet on children, families,
communities, the work place, schools, health care and civic/political life. The Project is nonpartisan and
takes no position on policy issues. Support for the Project is provided by The Pew Charitable Trusts.
More information is available at www.pewinternet.org


Survey questions
Spring Tracking Survey 2012                                            Final Topline           04/10/2012
Data for March 15–April 3, 2012

Princeton Survey Research Associates International for
the Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project

Sample: n=2,254 national adults, age 18 and older, including 903 cell phone interviews
Interviewing dates: 03.15.2012 – 04.03.2012

Margin of error is plus or minus 2 percentage points for results based on Total [n=2,254]
Margin of error is plus or minus 3 percentage points for results based on internet users [n=1,803]
Margin of error is plus or minus 3 percentage points for results based on cell phone owners [n=1,954]

Margin of error is plus or minus 3 percentage points for results based on cell phone owners who text message
   [n=1,395]

Margin of error is plus or minus 4 percentage points for results based on those who use the internet or email on
   their cell phone or download apps to their cell phone [n=953]
Margin of error is plus or minus 4 percentage points for results based on those who use the internet or email on
   their cell phone [n=929]
Margin of error is plus or minus 4 percentage points for results based on those who download apps to their cell
   phone [n=714]




Q10     Pease tell me if you happen to have each of the following items, or not. Do you have...
        [INSERT ITEMS IN ORDER]?

        A cell phone or a Blackberry or iPhone or
        other device that is also a cell phone3

3
  Question was asked of landline sample only. Results shown here have been recalculated to include cell phone
sample in the "Yes" percentage. In past polls, question was sometimes asked as an independent question and
sometimes as an item in a series. In January 2010, question wording was “Do you have...a cell phone or a
Blackberry or iPhone or other handheld device that is also a cell phone.” In Dec 2008, Nov 2008, May 2008,
January 2005 and Nov 23-30 2004, question wording was "Do you happen to have a cell phone?" In August 2008,
July 2008 and January 2008, question wording was "Do you have a cell phone, or a Blackberry or other device that


pewinternet.org                                                                                                    9
Current                                             88             12            *             *
         February 2012                                       88             12            0             *
         December 2011                                       87             13            0             *
         August 2011                                         84             15            *             *
         May 2011                                            83             17            *             0
         January 2011                                        84             16            *             *
         December 2010                                       81             19            *             *
         November 2010                                       82             18            0             *
         September 2010                                      85             15            *             *
         May 2010                                            82             18            *             0
         January 2010                                        80             20            0             *
         December 2009                                       83             17            0             *
         September 2009                                      84             15            *             *
         April 2009                                          85             15            *             *
         Dec 2008                                            84             16            *             *
         July 2008                                           82             18            *             --
         May 2008                                            78             22            *             0
         April 2008                                          78             22            *             --
         January 2008                                        77             22            *             --
         Dec 2007                                            75             25            *             --
         Sept 2007                                           78             22            *             --
         April 2006                                          73             27            *             --
         January 2005                                        66             34            *             --
         November 23-30, 2004                                65             35            *             --



Q14    Some cell phones are called “smartphones” because of certain features they have. Is your cell
phone a smartphone or not, or are you not sure?
Based on cell phone owners
                                                                      May
              current                                    Feb 2012 2011
       %      46        Yes, is a smartphone             45           33
              44        No, is not a smartphone          46           53
              10        Not sure                         8            14
              *         Refused                          *            *
               [n=1,954]                                            [n=1,961]     [n=1,914]



Q15    Which of the following best describes the type of cell phone you have? Is it an iPhone, a
Blackberry, an Android phone, a Windows phone, or something else?4
Based on cell phone owners
             current                                              fEB 2012      Dec 2011       May 2011
        %    20          iPhone                                   19            15             10
             5           Blackberry                               6             8              10
             22          Android                                  20            20             15

is also a cell phone?" In April 2008, Dec 2007, Sept 2007 and April 2006, question wording was “Do you have a cell
phone?” Beginning December 2007, question/item was not asked of the cell phone sample, but results shown here
reflect Total combined Landline and cell phone sample.
4
  Prior to April 2012, question wording was slightly different: “Which of the following best describes the type of cell
phone you have? Is it an iPhone, a Blackberry, an Android phone, a Windows phone, a Palm, or something else?”


pewinternet.org                                                                                                     10
2             Windows phone                            2             2             2
              n/a           Palm                                     1             2             2
              16            Basic cell phone – unspecified (VOL.)    16            18            8
              7             Samsung – unspecified (VOL.)             8             7             7
              5             LG – unspecified (VOL.)                  5             4             5
              4             Flip phone – unspecified (VOL.)          4             6             3
              2             Tracfone (VOL.)                          3             2             2
              3             Motorola – unspecified (VOL.)            2             2             3
              2             Nokia – unspecified (VOL.)               1             2             2
              1             Pantech – unspecified (VOL.)             1             1             1
              7             Something else (SPECIFY)                 6             7             16
              5             Don’t know                               4             4             13
              *             Refused                                  *             *             1
              [n=1,954]                                              [n=1,961]     [n=2,771]     [n=1,914]


Q23     Thinking of some of the things you have done recently with your cell phone... In the last
        30 days, have you used your cell phone to [INSERT ITEMS; RANDOMIZE]?

        Based on cell phone owners [N=1,954]


                                                               YES          NO      DON’T KNOW    REFUSED
        a.   Look something up to help settle an argument      27           73          *             *
             or disagreement you were having
        b.   Coordinate a gathering, meeting or get-           41           59          0             *
             together
        c.   Solve an unexpected problem for yourself or       35           64          1             *
             someone else
                                                               19           80          *             *
        d.   Get help in an emergency situation
                                                               23           77          0             0
        e.   Look up the score of a sporting event
        f.   Get up-to-the minute traffic or public transit
             information so you could find the fastest way     20           80          0             *
             to get somewhere
        g.   Decide whether or not to visit a particular       30           70          *             0
             business, such as a restaurant




Methodology

        This report is based on the findings of a survey on Americans' use of the internet. The results in
this report are based on data from telephone interviews conducted by Princeton Survey Research
Associates International from March 15 to April 3, 2012, among a sample of 2,254 adults, age 18 and
older. Telephone interviews were conducted in English and Spanish by landline (1,351) and cell phone
(903, including 410 without a landline phone). For results based on the total sample, one can say with
95% confidence that the error attributable to sampling is plus or minus 2.4 percentage points. For



pewinternet.org                                                                                           11
results based on internet users5 (n=1,803), the margin of sampling error is plus or minus 2.7 percentage
points. In addition to sampling error, question wording and practical difficulties in conducting telephone
surveys may introduce some error or bias into the findings of opinion polls. A combination of landline
and cellular random digit dial (RDD) samples was used to represent all adults in the continental United
States who have access to either a landline or cellular telephone. Both samples were provided by Survey
Sampling International, LLC (SSI) according to PSRAI specifications. Numbers for the landline sample
were selected with probabilities in proportion to their share of listed telephone households from active
blocks (area code + exchange + two-digit block number) that contained three or more residential
directory listings. The cellular sample was not list-assisted, but was drawn through a systematic sampling
from dedicated wireless 100-blocks and shared service 100-blocks with no directory-listed landline
numbers.
         New sample was released daily and was kept in the field for at least five days. The sample was
released in replicates, which are representative subsamples of the larger population. This ensures that
complete call procedures were followed for the entire sample. At least 7 attempts were made to
complete an interview at a sampled telephone number. The calls were staggered over times of day and
days of the week to maximize the chances of making contact with a potential respondent. Each number
received at least one daytime call in an attempt to find someone available. For the landline sample,
interviewers asked to speak with the youngest adult male or female currently at home based on a
random rotation. If no male/female was available, interviewers asked to speak with the youngest adult
of the other gender. For the cellular sample, interviews were conducted with the person who answered
the phone. Interviewers verified that the person was an adult and in a safe place before administering
the survey. Cellular sample respondents were offered a post-paid cash incentive for their participation.
All interviews completed on any given day were considered to be the final sample for that day.
         Weighting is generally used in survey analysis to compensate for sample designs and patterns of
non-response that might bias results. A two-stage weighting procedure was used to weight this dual-
frame sample. The first-stage corrected for different probabilities of selection associated with the
number of adults in each household and each respondent’s telephone usage patterns.6 This weighting
also adjusts for the overlapping landline and cell sample frames and the relative sizes of each frame and
each sample.

         The second stage of weighting balances sample demographics to population parameters. The
sample is balanced to match national population parameters for sex, age, education, race, Hispanic
origin, region (U.S. Census definitions), population density, and telephone usage. The Hispanic origin
was split out based on nativity; U.S born and non-U.S. born. The White, non-Hispanic subgroup is also
balanced on age, education and region. The basic weighting parameters came from a special analysis of
the Census Bureau’s 2011 Annual Social and Economic Supplement (ASEC) that included all households
in the United States. The population density parameter was derived from Census 2000 data. The cell
phone usage parameter came from an analysis of the July-December 2010 National Health Interview
Survey.7


        Following is the full disposition of all sampled telephone numbers:


5
  Internet user definition includes those who access the internet on their cell phones or other mobile handheld
device.
6
  i.e., whether respondents have only a landline telephone, only a cell phone, or both kinds of telephone.
7
  Blumberg SJ, Luke JV. Wireless substitution: Early release of estimates from the National Health Interview Survey,
July-December, 2010. National Center for Health Statistics. June 2011.


pewinternet.org                                                                                                  12
Table 2:Sample Disposition
                   Landline        Cell
                   33,738          22,143        Total Numbers Dialed

                   1,502            332          Non-residential
                   1,491            45           Computer/Fax
                   8                ----         Cell phone
                   15,401           8,237        Other not working
                   2,746            404          Additional projected not working
                   12,590           13,126       Working numbers
                   37.3%            59.3%        Working Rate

                   915              135          No Answer / Busy
                   3,472            4,465        Voice Mail
                   66               5            Other Non-Contact
                   8,137            8,521        Contacted numbers
                   64.6%            64.9%        Contact Rate

                   523              1,382        Callback
                   6,161            5,654        Refusal
                   1,453            1,485        Cooperating numbers
                   17.9%            17.4%        Cooperation Rate

                   52               43           Language Barrier
                   ----             498          Child's cell phone
                   1,401            944          Eligible numbers
                   96.4%            63.6%        Eligibility Rate

                   50               41           Break-off
                   1,351            903          Completes
                   96.4%            95.7%        Completion Rate

                   11.1%            10.8%        Response Rate

       The disposition reports all of the sampled telephone numbers ever dialed from the original
telephone number samples. The response rate estimates the fraction of all eligible respondents in the
sample that were ultimately interviewed. At PSRAI it is calculated by taking the product of three
component rates:
    o   Contact rate – the proportion of working numbers where a request for interview was made
    o   Cooperation rate – the proportion of contacted numbers where a consent for interview was at
        least initially obtained, versus those refused
    o   Completion rate – the proportion of initially cooperating and eligible interviews that were
        completed
Thus the response rate for the landline sample was 11 percent. The response rate for the cellular sample
was 11 percent.




pewinternet.org                                                                                         13

More Related Content

What's hot

Rise of the Apps Culture - Pew Internet Project
Rise of the Apps Culture - Pew Internet Project Rise of the Apps Culture - Pew Internet Project
Rise of the Apps Culture - Pew Internet Project Sustainly
 
2012 pip teens smartphones_and_texting
2012 pip teens smartphones_and_texting2012 pip teens smartphones_and_texting
2012 pip teens smartphones_and_textingDustianne North
 
2012 pip futureof internetyoungbrains
2012 pip futureof internetyoungbrains2012 pip futureof internetyoungbrains
2012 pip futureof internetyoungbrainsDustianne North
 
2012 pip teens kindness_cruelty_sns_report_nov_2011_final_110711
2012 pip teens kindness_cruelty_sns_report_nov_2011_final_1107112012 pip teens kindness_cruelty_sns_report_nov_2011_final_110711
2012 pip teens kindness_cruelty_sns_report_nov_2011_final_110711Dustianne North
 
Information 2.0 and beyond where are we going
Information 2.0 and beyond  where are we goingInformation 2.0 and beyond  where are we going
Information 2.0 and beyond where are we goingHero Wa
 
Cross generational view of women and tech
Cross generational view of women and techCross generational view of women and tech
Cross generational view of women and techLisa D'Adamo-Weinstein
 

What's hot (19)

Reaching Your Audience in the Digital Age: Key Research Trends to Watch
Reaching Your Audience in the Digital Age: Key Research Trends to WatchReaching Your Audience in the Digital Age: Key Research Trends to Watch
Reaching Your Audience in the Digital Age: Key Research Trends to Watch
 
Technology Device OWNERSHIP: 2015
Technology Device OWNERSHIP: 2015 Technology Device OWNERSHIP: 2015
Technology Device OWNERSHIP: 2015
 
The State of Mobile Connectivity
The State of Mobile ConnectivityThe State of Mobile Connectivity
The State of Mobile Connectivity
 
The State of Mobile America
The State of Mobile AmericaThe State of Mobile America
The State of Mobile America
 
Rise of the Apps Culture - Pew Internet Project
Rise of the Apps Culture - Pew Internet Project Rise of the Apps Culture - Pew Internet Project
Rise of the Apps Culture - Pew Internet Project
 
2012 pip teens smartphones_and_texting
2012 pip teens smartphones_and_texting2012 pip teens smartphones_and_texting
2012 pip teens smartphones_and_texting
 
2012 pip futureof internetyoungbrains
2012 pip futureof internetyoungbrains2012 pip futureof internetyoungbrains
2012 pip futureof internetyoungbrains
 
2012 pip teens kindness_cruelty_sns_report_nov_2011_final_110711
2012 pip teens kindness_cruelty_sns_report_nov_2011_final_1107112012 pip teens kindness_cruelty_sns_report_nov_2011_final_110711
2012 pip teens kindness_cruelty_sns_report_nov_2011_final_110711
 
Information on the go
Information on the goInformation on the go
Information on the go
 
Information 2.0 and beyond where are we going
Information 2.0 and beyond  where are we goingInformation 2.0 and beyond  where are we going
Information 2.0 and beyond where are we going
 
Information 2.0 and Beyond: Where are we, where are we going?
Information 2.0 and Beyond: Where are we, where are we going?Information 2.0 and Beyond: Where are we, where are we going?
Information 2.0 and Beyond: Where are we, where are we going?
 
Cross generational view of women and tech
Cross generational view of women and techCross generational view of women and tech
Cross generational view of women and tech
 
My Digital Library: Leveraging Today’s Mobile and Participatory Information E...
My Digital Library: Leveraging Today’s Mobile and Participatory Information E...My Digital Library: Leveraging Today’s Mobile and Participatory Information E...
My Digital Library: Leveraging Today’s Mobile and Participatory Information E...
 
10 Things to Know About How Teens Use Technology
10 Things to Know About How Teens Use Technology10 Things to Know About How Teens Use Technology
10 Things to Know About How Teens Use Technology
 
"How do [they] even do that? A Pew Internet guide to teens, young adults, mob...
"How do [they] even do that? A Pew Internet guide to teens, young adults, mob..."How do [they] even do that? A Pew Internet guide to teens, young adults, mob...
"How do [they] even do that? A Pew Internet guide to teens, young adults, mob...
 
Smartphone Ownership — 2013 Update
Smartphone Ownership — 2013 UpdateSmartphone Ownership — 2013 Update
Smartphone Ownership — 2013 Update
 
Trends to Watch: News and Information Consumption
Trends to Watch: News and Information ConsumptionTrends to Watch: News and Information Consumption
Trends to Watch: News and Information Consumption
 
Mobile is the Needle, Social is the Thread: How Information Today is Woven In...
Mobile is the Needle, Social is the Thread: How Information Today is Woven In...Mobile is the Needle, Social is the Thread: How Information Today is Woven In...
Mobile is the Needle, Social is the Thread: How Information Today is Woven In...
 
News Consumption 2010: Portable, Participatory and Personal
 News Consumption 2010: Portable, Participatory and Personal  News Consumption 2010: Portable, Participatory and Personal
News Consumption 2010: Portable, Participatory and Personal
 

Similar to Just-in-Time Mobile Info

Getting to Know the Newly Mobile Senior Set
Getting to Know the Newly Mobile Senior SetGetting to Know the Newly Mobile Senior Set
Getting to Know the Newly Mobile Senior Setsachsinsights
 
Online marketing strategy for audiologists
Online marketing strategy for audiologistsOnline marketing strategy for audiologists
Online marketing strategy for audiologistsGeoffrey Cooling
 
APRIL 2013: Google/Ipsos Data Breakdown - Boomers
APRIL 2013: Google/Ipsos Data Breakdown - BoomersAPRIL 2013: Google/Ipsos Data Breakdown - Boomers
APRIL 2013: Google/Ipsos Data Breakdown - BoomersAARP
 
APRIL 2013: Google on Boomers & Seniors Online
APRIL 2013: Google on Boomers & Seniors OnlineAPRIL 2013: Google on Boomers & Seniors Online
APRIL 2013: Google on Boomers & Seniors OnlineAARP
 
2009 Women and Social Media Study by BlogHer, iVillage and Compass Partners
2009 Women and Social Media Study by BlogHer, iVillage and Compass Partners2009 Women and Social Media Study by BlogHer, iVillage and Compass Partners
2009 Women and Social Media Study by BlogHer, iVillage and Compass PartnersLisa Stone
 
Google/Ipsos Seniors Online April 2013
Google/Ipsos Seniors Online April 2013Google/Ipsos Seniors Online April 2013
Google/Ipsos Seniors Online April 2013AARP
 
Teens Social Media And Health Nyph Dept 041009nn Amrevise
Teens Social Media And Health   Nyph Dept 041009nn AmreviseTeens Social Media And Health   Nyph Dept 041009nn Amrevise
Teens Social Media And Health Nyph Dept 041009nn Amrevisetrygd
 

Similar to Just-in-Time Mobile Info (20)

Teens 2012: Truth, Trends, and Myths About Teen Online Behavior
Teens 2012: Truth, Trends, and Myths About Teen Online BehaviorTeens 2012: Truth, Trends, and Myths About Teen Online Behavior
Teens 2012: Truth, Trends, and Myths About Teen Online Behavior
 
Mobile Philanthropy
Mobile PhilanthropyMobile Philanthropy
Mobile Philanthropy
 
Libraries 2020: Imagining the library of the (not too distant) future
Libraries 2020: Imagining the library of the (not too distant) futureLibraries 2020: Imagining the library of the (not too distant) future
Libraries 2020: Imagining the library of the (not too distant) future
 
Getting to Know the Newly Mobile Senior Set
Getting to Know the Newly Mobile Senior SetGetting to Know the Newly Mobile Senior Set
Getting to Know the Newly Mobile Senior Set
 
The State of Millennials
The State of MillennialsThe State of Millennials
The State of Millennials
 
Books or Nooks? How Americans’ reading habits are shifting in a digital world
Books or Nooks? How Americans’ reading habits are shifting in a digital worldBooks or Nooks? How Americans’ reading habits are shifting in a digital world
Books or Nooks? How Americans’ reading habits are shifting in a digital world
 
Older Adults and Internet Use: (Some of) What we know
Older Adults and Internet Use: (Some of) What we knowOlder Adults and Internet Use: (Some of) What we know
Older Adults and Internet Use: (Some of) What we know
 
Participatory Medicine at NIH
Participatory Medicine at NIHParticipatory Medicine at NIH
Participatory Medicine at NIH
 
Online marketing strategy for audiologists
Online marketing strategy for audiologistsOnline marketing strategy for audiologists
Online marketing strategy for audiologists
 
OMH SF Presentation 040809
OMH SF Presentation 040809OMH SF Presentation 040809
OMH SF Presentation 040809
 
Client Use of Technology
Client Use of TechnologyClient Use of Technology
Client Use of Technology
 
The Mobile Difference
The Mobile DifferenceThe Mobile Difference
The Mobile Difference
 
APRIL 2013: Google/Ipsos Data Breakdown - Boomers
APRIL 2013: Google/Ipsos Data Breakdown - BoomersAPRIL 2013: Google/Ipsos Data Breakdown - Boomers
APRIL 2013: Google/Ipsos Data Breakdown - Boomers
 
APRIL 2013: Google on Boomers & Seniors Online
APRIL 2013: Google on Boomers & Seniors OnlineAPRIL 2013: Google on Boomers & Seniors Online
APRIL 2013: Google on Boomers & Seniors Online
 
2009 Women and Social Media Study by BlogHer, iVillage and Compass Partners
2009 Women and Social Media Study by BlogHer, iVillage and Compass Partners2009 Women and Social Media Study by BlogHer, iVillage and Compass Partners
2009 Women and Social Media Study by BlogHer, iVillage and Compass Partners
 
What people living with rare disease can teach us
What people living with rare disease can teach usWhat people living with rare disease can teach us
What people living with rare disease can teach us
 
E-patients and their hunt for health information
E-patients and their hunt for health informationE-patients and their hunt for health information
E-patients and their hunt for health information
 
Google/Ipsos Seniors Online April 2013
Google/Ipsos Seniors Online April 2013Google/Ipsos Seniors Online April 2013
Google/Ipsos Seniors Online April 2013
 
Teens and Social Media: An Overview
Teens and Social Media: An OverviewTeens and Social Media: An Overview
Teens and Social Media: An Overview
 
Teens Social Media And Health Nyph Dept 041009nn Amrevise
Teens Social Media And Health   Nyph Dept 041009nn AmreviseTeens Social Media And Health   Nyph Dept 041009nn Amrevise
Teens Social Media And Health Nyph Dept 041009nn Amrevise
 

More from Path of the Blue Eye Project

Getting to Value: Eleven Chronic Disease Technologies to Watch
Getting to Value: Eleven Chronic Disease Technologies to WatchGetting to Value: Eleven Chronic Disease Technologies to Watch
Getting to Value: Eleven Chronic Disease Technologies to WatchPath of the Blue Eye Project
 
McKinsey Global Institute - Big data: The next frontier for innovation, compe...
McKinsey Global Institute - Big data: The next frontier for innovation, compe...McKinsey Global Institute - Big data: The next frontier for innovation, compe...
McKinsey Global Institute - Big data: The next frontier for innovation, compe...Path of the Blue Eye Project
 
Young Physicians and their Views Regarding the Future of the U.S. Healthcare ...
Young Physicians and their Views Regarding the Future of the U.S. Healthcare ...Young Physicians and their Views Regarding the Future of the U.S. Healthcare ...
Young Physicians and their Views Regarding the Future of the U.S. Healthcare ...Path of the Blue Eye Project
 
IBM and Cincom: Guiding Smarter Interactions in Healthcare Reform
IBM and Cincom: Guiding Smarter Interactions in Healthcare ReformIBM and Cincom: Guiding Smarter Interactions in Healthcare Reform
IBM and Cincom: Guiding Smarter Interactions in Healthcare ReformPath of the Blue Eye Project
 
MARS Study Outlines Online Habits of Health Consumers
MARS Study Outlines Online Habits of Health Consumers MARS Study Outlines Online Habits of Health Consumers
MARS Study Outlines Online Habits of Health Consumers Path of the Blue Eye Project
 
Most Marketers Unaware of What Digital ROI Means, Fail to Measure it Appropri...
Most Marketers Unaware of What Digital ROI Means, Fail to Measure it Appropri...Most Marketers Unaware of What Digital ROI Means, Fail to Measure it Appropri...
Most Marketers Unaware of What Digital ROI Means, Fail to Measure it Appropri...Path of the Blue Eye Project
 
Overview of FDA Guidance Document Developed by Dose of Digital
Overview of FDA Guidance Document Developed by Dose of DigitalOverview of FDA Guidance Document Developed by Dose of Digital
Overview of FDA Guidance Document Developed by Dose of DigitalPath of the Blue Eye Project
 
FDA Draft Guidance on Responding to Unsolicited Requests for Off-Label Drug I...
FDA Draft Guidance on Responding to Unsolicited Requests for Off-Label Drug I...FDA Draft Guidance on Responding to Unsolicited Requests for Off-Label Drug I...
FDA Draft Guidance on Responding to Unsolicited Requests for Off-Label Drug I...Path of the Blue Eye Project
 

More from Path of the Blue Eye Project (20)

CDC Facebook guidelines
CDC Facebook guidelinesCDC Facebook guidelines
CDC Facebook guidelines
 
Getting to Value: Eleven Chronic Disease Technologies to Watch
Getting to Value: Eleven Chronic Disease Technologies to WatchGetting to Value: Eleven Chronic Disease Technologies to Watch
Getting to Value: Eleven Chronic Disease Technologies to Watch
 
CDC's Health Communicator's Toolkit
CDC's Health Communicator's ToolkitCDC's Health Communicator's Toolkit
CDC's Health Communicator's Toolkit
 
CDC's Guide to writing for social media
CDC's Guide to writing for social mediaCDC's Guide to writing for social media
CDC's Guide to writing for social media
 
Productive Social-Marketing
Productive Social-MarketingProductive Social-Marketing
Productive Social-Marketing
 
McKinsey Global Institute - Big data: The next frontier for innovation, compe...
McKinsey Global Institute - Big data: The next frontier for innovation, compe...McKinsey Global Institute - Big data: The next frontier for innovation, compe...
McKinsey Global Institute - Big data: The next frontier for innovation, compe...
 
Young Physicians and their Views Regarding the Future of the U.S. Healthcare ...
Young Physicians and their Views Regarding the Future of the U.S. Healthcare ...Young Physicians and their Views Regarding the Future of the U.S. Healthcare ...
Young Physicians and their Views Regarding the Future of the U.S. Healthcare ...
 
IBM and Cincom: Guiding Smarter Interactions in Healthcare Reform
IBM and Cincom: Guiding Smarter Interactions in Healthcare ReformIBM and Cincom: Guiding Smarter Interactions in Healthcare Reform
IBM and Cincom: Guiding Smarter Interactions in Healthcare Reform
 
Pew Research Center: Digital Differences
Pew Research Center: Digital DifferencesPew Research Center: Digital Differences
Pew Research Center: Digital Differences
 
Recall Bias and Digital Health Market Research
Recall Bias and Digital Health Market ResearchRecall Bias and Digital Health Market Research
Recall Bias and Digital Health Market Research
 
MARS Study Outlines Online Habits of Health Consumers
MARS Study Outlines Online Habits of Health Consumers MARS Study Outlines Online Habits of Health Consumers
MARS Study Outlines Online Habits of Health Consumers
 
Most Marketers Unaware of What Digital ROI Means, Fail to Measure it Appropri...
Most Marketers Unaware of What Digital ROI Means, Fail to Measure it Appropri...Most Marketers Unaware of What Digital ROI Means, Fail to Measure it Appropri...
Most Marketers Unaware of What Digital ROI Means, Fail to Measure it Appropri...
 
Search Engine Use 2012
Search Engine Use 2012Search Engine Use 2012
Search Engine Use 2012
 
Nielsen Digital Consumer Report Q3-Q4 2011
Nielsen Digital Consumer Report Q3-Q4 2011Nielsen Digital Consumer Report Q3-Q4 2011
Nielsen Digital Consumer Report Q3-Q4 2011
 
Overview of FDA Guidance Document Developed by Dose of Digital
Overview of FDA Guidance Document Developed by Dose of DigitalOverview of FDA Guidance Document Developed by Dose of Digital
Overview of FDA Guidance Document Developed by Dose of Digital
 
FDA Draft Guidance on Responding to Unsolicited Requests for Off-Label Drug I...
FDA Draft Guidance on Responding to Unsolicited Requests for Off-Label Drug I...FDA Draft Guidance on Responding to Unsolicited Requests for Off-Label Drug I...
FDA Draft Guidance on Responding to Unsolicited Requests for Off-Label Drug I...
 
Unniched mo tech
Unniched mo techUnniched mo tech
Unniched mo tech
 
Poster instrat final_rev2
Poster instrat final_rev2Poster instrat final_rev2
Poster instrat final_rev2
 
Unniched instrat
Unniched instratUnniched instrat
Unniched instrat
 
Unniched ignite gamification_10252011
Unniched ignite gamification_10252011Unniched ignite gamification_10252011
Unniched ignite gamification_10252011
 

Recently uploaded

What is DBT - The Ultimate Data Build Tool.pdf
What is DBT - The Ultimate Data Build Tool.pdfWhat is DBT - The Ultimate Data Build Tool.pdf
What is DBT - The Ultimate Data Build Tool.pdfMounikaPolabathina
 
unit 4 immunoblotting technique complete.pptx
unit 4 immunoblotting technique complete.pptxunit 4 immunoblotting technique complete.pptx
unit 4 immunoblotting technique complete.pptxBkGupta21
 
Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?
Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?
Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?Mattias Andersson
 
Passkey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Passkey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxPasskey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Passkey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxLoriGlavin3
 
The Ultimate Guide to Choosing WordPress Pros and Cons
The Ultimate Guide to Choosing WordPress Pros and ConsThe Ultimate Guide to Choosing WordPress Pros and Cons
The Ultimate Guide to Choosing WordPress Pros and ConsPixlogix Infotech
 
Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)
Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)
Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)Mark Simos
 
How to write a Business Continuity Plan
How to write a Business Continuity PlanHow to write a Business Continuity Plan
How to write a Business Continuity PlanDatabarracks
 
DSPy a system for AI to Write Prompts and Do Fine Tuning
DSPy a system for AI to Write Prompts and Do Fine TuningDSPy a system for AI to Write Prompts and Do Fine Tuning
DSPy a system for AI to Write Prompts and Do Fine TuningLars Bell
 
The State of Passkeys with FIDO Alliance.pptx
The State of Passkeys with FIDO Alliance.pptxThe State of Passkeys with FIDO Alliance.pptx
The State of Passkeys with FIDO Alliance.pptxLoriGlavin3
 
TrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data Privacy
TrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data PrivacyTrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data Privacy
TrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data PrivacyTrustArc
 
From Family Reminiscence to Scholarly Archive .
From Family Reminiscence to Scholarly Archive .From Family Reminiscence to Scholarly Archive .
From Family Reminiscence to Scholarly Archive .Alan Dix
 
Hyperautomation and AI/ML: A Strategy for Digital Transformation Success.pdf
Hyperautomation and AI/ML: A Strategy for Digital Transformation Success.pdfHyperautomation and AI/ML: A Strategy for Digital Transformation Success.pdf
Hyperautomation and AI/ML: A Strategy for Digital Transformation Success.pdfPrecisely
 
Connect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck Presentation
Connect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck PresentationConnect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck Presentation
Connect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck PresentationSlibray Presentation
 
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdfUnraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdfAlex Barbosa Coqueiro
 
Digital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Digital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxDigital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Digital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxLoriGlavin3
 
Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pdf
Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pdfMoving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pdf
Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pdfLoriGlavin3
 
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache MavenDevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache MavenHervé Boutemy
 
A Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
A Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxA Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
A Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxLoriGlavin3
 
TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024
TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024
TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024Lonnie McRorey
 
Use of FIDO in the Payments and Identity Landscape: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Use of FIDO in the Payments and Identity Landscape: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxUse of FIDO in the Payments and Identity Landscape: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Use of FIDO in the Payments and Identity Landscape: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxLoriGlavin3
 

Recently uploaded (20)

What is DBT - The Ultimate Data Build Tool.pdf
What is DBT - The Ultimate Data Build Tool.pdfWhat is DBT - The Ultimate Data Build Tool.pdf
What is DBT - The Ultimate Data Build Tool.pdf
 
unit 4 immunoblotting technique complete.pptx
unit 4 immunoblotting technique complete.pptxunit 4 immunoblotting technique complete.pptx
unit 4 immunoblotting technique complete.pptx
 
Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?
Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?
Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?
 
Passkey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Passkey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxPasskey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Passkey Providers and Enabling Portability: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
 
The Ultimate Guide to Choosing WordPress Pros and Cons
The Ultimate Guide to Choosing WordPress Pros and ConsThe Ultimate Guide to Choosing WordPress Pros and Cons
The Ultimate Guide to Choosing WordPress Pros and Cons
 
Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)
Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)
Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)
 
How to write a Business Continuity Plan
How to write a Business Continuity PlanHow to write a Business Continuity Plan
How to write a Business Continuity Plan
 
DSPy a system for AI to Write Prompts and Do Fine Tuning
DSPy a system for AI to Write Prompts and Do Fine TuningDSPy a system for AI to Write Prompts and Do Fine Tuning
DSPy a system for AI to Write Prompts and Do Fine Tuning
 
The State of Passkeys with FIDO Alliance.pptx
The State of Passkeys with FIDO Alliance.pptxThe State of Passkeys with FIDO Alliance.pptx
The State of Passkeys with FIDO Alliance.pptx
 
TrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data Privacy
TrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data PrivacyTrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data Privacy
TrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data Privacy
 
From Family Reminiscence to Scholarly Archive .
From Family Reminiscence to Scholarly Archive .From Family Reminiscence to Scholarly Archive .
From Family Reminiscence to Scholarly Archive .
 
Hyperautomation and AI/ML: A Strategy for Digital Transformation Success.pdf
Hyperautomation and AI/ML: A Strategy for Digital Transformation Success.pdfHyperautomation and AI/ML: A Strategy for Digital Transformation Success.pdf
Hyperautomation and AI/ML: A Strategy for Digital Transformation Success.pdf
 
Connect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck Presentation
Connect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck PresentationConnect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck Presentation
Connect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck Presentation
 
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdfUnraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
 
Digital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Digital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxDigital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Digital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
 
Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pdf
Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pdfMoving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pdf
Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pdf
 
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache MavenDevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
 
A Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
A Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxA Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
A Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
 
TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024
TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024
TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024
 
Use of FIDO in the Payments and Identity Landscape: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Use of FIDO in the Payments and Identity Landscape: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxUse of FIDO in the Payments and Identity Landscape: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Use of FIDO in the Payments and Identity Landscape: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
 

Just-in-Time Mobile Info

  • 1. MAY 7, 2012 Just-in-time Information through Mobile Connections 86% of smartphone owners used their phone in the past month to make real-time queries to help them meet friends, solve problems, or settle arguments Lee Rainie Director, Pew Internet Project Susannah Fox Associate Director, Pew Internet Project Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project 1615 L St., NW – Suite 700 Washington, D.C. 20036 Phone: 202-419-4500 http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Just-in-time.aspx
  • 2. Summary of Findings Some 70% of all cell phone owners and 86% of smartphone owners have used their phones in the previous 30 days to perform at least one of the following activities:  Coordinate a meeting or get-together -- 41% of cell phone owners have done this in the past 30 days.  Solve an unexpected problem that they or someone else had encountered -- 35% have used their phones to do this in the past 30 days.  Decide whether to visit a business, such as a restaurant -- 30% have used their phone to do this in the past 30 days.  Find information to help settle an argument they were having -- 27% have used their phone to get information for that reason in the past 30 days.  Look up a score of a sporting event -- 23% have used their phone to do that in the past 30 days.  Get up-to-the-minute traffic or public transit information to find the fastest way to get somewhere -- 20% have used their phone to get that kind of information in the past 30 days.  Get help in an emergency situation -- 19% have used their phone to do that in the past 30 days. Overall, these “just-in-time” cell users—defined as anyone who has done one or more of the above activities using their phone in the preceding 30 days—amount to 62% of the entire adult population. Younger cell phone users are more likely than older users to have performed most of these activities. In all, 88% of the cell phone owners ages 18-29 had performed one of these activities in the past 30 days, compared with 76% of the cell owners ages 30-49, 57% of the cell owners ages 50-64, and 46% of the cell owners age 65 and older. There are also differences between men and women, parents of minor children and non-parents, and among whites, African-Americans, and Hispanics on some of these activities. For instance:  Men who own cells are more likely than women cell owners to have used their phones in the past 30 days to look up information that settles an argument or disagreement: 31% of males who own cells have done this, compared with 22% of women cell owners.  White cell phone owners are more likely than minorities to have used their phones to coordinate a gathering in the past 30 days. Some 43% of white cell owners have done this, compared with 33% of African-Americans who own cells and 34% of Hispanic cell owners.  African-American cell owners are more likely than whites to have used their phones in the past month to get up-to-the-minute traffic or public transit information: 31% vs. 16%. pewinternet.org 2
  • 3. These just-in-time information searches take place in the wider context of people using their smartphones to get needed information right away. In this survey, we also asked about using cell phones to get turn-by-turn navigation or directions while driving. Some 65% of smartphone owners say they have done that, with 15% doing so on a typical day. These findings come from a nationally representative survey by the Pew Internet Project conducted between March 15 and April 3, 2012 among 2,254 adults age 18 and older. The margin of error on the full sample is 2 percentage points. Some 1,954 cell owners were part of the sample. The margin of error of questions asked of them is 3 percentage points. pewinternet.org 3
  • 4. Main Report The rapid adoption of cell phones and, especially, the spread of internet-connected smartphones are changing people’s communications with others and their relationships with information. Users’ ability to access data immediately through apps and web browsers and through contact with their social networks is creating a new culture of real-time information seekers and problem solvers. The Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project has documented some of the ways that people perform just-in-time services with their cell phones. Earlier this year, we reported on the 9% of adults who sometimes make spur-of-the-moment text donations to charities1. We have also examined the use of cell phones inside stores during the holiday season, as users consulted friends about purchases and looked online for price comparisons and reviews about things they were thinking of buying.2 More recently, a new nationally representative survey by the Pew Internet Project has found additional evidence of this just-in-time phenomenon. The survey was conducted between March 15 and April 3, 2012 among 2,254 adults age 18 and older and it found that 88% of adults are cell phone owners and that 46% are smartphone owners. In the section of the survey exploring the just-in-time behaviors of the cell-using population, respondents were asked if they had used their phone to access different types of time-sensitive information in the 30 days preceding the survey. Their answers disclosed that:  41% of cell phone owners used their phone in the previous 30 days to coordinate a meeting or get-together.  35% used their phone to solve an unexpected problem they or someone else had encountered in the previous 30 days.  30% used their phone in the previous 30 days to decide whether to visit a business, such as a restaurant  27% used their phone in the previous 30 days to get information to help settle an argument they were having.  23% used their phone in the previous 30 days to look up a score of a sporting event.  20% used their phone in the previous 30 days for up-to-the-minute traffic or public transit information to find the fastest way to get somewhere.  19% used their phone to get help in an emergency situation. In all, 70% of cell phone owners – representing 62% of the entire adult population – have used their phone in the previous month to do at least one of these real-time searches. 1 “Real Time Charitable Giving” (Pew Internet: January 12, 2012). Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/MobileGiving.aspx 2 “The rise of in-store mobile commerce” (Pew Internet: January 30, 2012). Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/In-store-mobile-commerce.aspx pewinternet.org 4
  • 5. The demographics of just-in-time phone users The young, the relatively well-educated and well-off, and parents of minor children are more likely than other kinds of cell owners to have used their cell phones recently for the just-in-time activities we measured in this survey. A wide range of cell owners use their phones for just-in-time information 70% of adult cell owners have performed at least one of seven different just-in-time searches Pew Internet measured in a survey. This is the % of cell owners in each group who have done at least one such search in the preceding 30 days. % who have done at least one of several just-in-time searches in past 30 days All adult cell owners (age 18+) 70% Men 73 Women 67 Race/ethnicity White, Non-Hispanic 70 Black, Non-Hispanic 68 Hispanic (English- and Spanish-speaking) 73 Age 18-29 88 30-49 76 50-64 57 65+ 46 Household income Less than $30,000/yr 63 $30,000-$49,999 67 $50,000-$74,999 76 $75,000+ 81 Educational attainment No high school diploma 64 High school grad 64 Some College 72 College + 78 Parental status Parent of minor child 75 Non-parent 68 Source: Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Mobile Survey, March 15-April 3, 2012. N for entire survey = 2,254 respondents age 18 older and N=1,954 for cell owners. Interviews were conducted in English and Spanish and on landline and cells. pewinternet.org 5
  • 6. Younger cell phone users are considerably more likely than older users to have done these kinds of searches. Overall, 88% of cell phone owners ages 18-29 had performed one or more of these activities in the past 30 days, compared with 76% of cell owners ages 30-49, 57% of cell owners ages 50-64, and 46% of the owners age 65 and older. Young adults are more likely to use their cells for real-time information than their elders % of cell owners in each age group who have performed these real-time activities in the previous 30 days 18-29 30-49 50-64 65+ 60% Coordinate a gathering 45% 27% 23% 49% Solve an unexpected problem 39% 26% 15% 43% Decide whether or not to visit a business, such as 37% restaurant 18% 12% 45% Look up something to settle an argument 31% 15% 4% 33% Look up sports score 29% 14% 5% 31% Get up-to-the minute traffic or public transit info 23% 11% 4% 21% Get help in an emergency situation 21% 18% 16% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% Source: Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Mobile Survey, March 15-April 3, 2012. N for entire survey = 2,254 respondents age 18 older and N=1,954 for cell owners. Interviews were conducted in English and Spanish and on landline and cells. Some 86% of smartphone owners have used their phones for at least one of these purposes, a figure that is considerably higher than among other cell users —52% of non-smartphone owners have used their phone for some sort of just-in-time searching in the preceding 30 days. These smartphone owners are also considerably more likely than other cell users to have done each of the individual activities we measured in our survey—the only exception is getting help in an emergency situation, as both smartphone owners and other types of cell owners were equally likely to have used their phone recently for this purpose. pewinternet.org 6
  • 7. Smartphone owners get real-time information % of cell owners in each group who have performed these real-time activities in the previous 30 days Smartphone owner Other cell owners 60% 49% 50% 50% 46% 47% 39% 40% 33% 32% 30% 20% 18% 22% 20% 10% 10% 5% 5% 6% 0% Get help in an Get up-to-the Look up sports Look up Decide Solve an Coordinate a emergency minute traffic score something to whether or unexpected gathering situation or public settle an not to visit a problem transit info argument business, such as restaurant Source: Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Mobile Survey, March 15-April 3, 2012. N for entire survey = 2,254 respondents age 18 older; N=1,954 for cell owners; N=904 for smartphone owners; N=1,050 for other cell phone owners. Interviews were conducted in English and Spanish and on landline and cells. Other demographic differences appear in a least some of these just-in-time searches. For instance:  Men who own cells are more likely than women cell owners to have used their phones in the past 30 days to look for information that settles an argument or disagreement: 31% of males who own cells have done this, compared with 22% of women cell owners. In addition, male cell owners (31%) are more likely than females (14%) to have used their phones to check on sports scores. Overall, men who own cells are more likely than women to have used their phone in the past month for at least one of these purposes: 73% of men who own cells have done at least one of these things, compared with 67% of women.  Parents of minor children are more likely than non-parents to have done several of these just-in- time searches in the past 30 days: Compared with cell owners with no minor children living at home, parents who own cell phones are more likely to have used their phones to solve an unexpected problem (40% vs. 33%); to have used their phones to decide whether to visit a local business (38% vs. 27%); to have looked up something to help settle an argument (32% vs. 24%); and to have looked up a sports score (28% vs. 20%).  White cell phone owners are more likely than minorities to have used their phones to coordinate a gathering in the past 30 days. Some 43% of white cell owners have done this, compared with 33% of African-Americans who own cells and 34% of Hispanic cell owners. On pewinternet.org 7
  • 8. the other hand, African-American cell owners are more likely than whites to have used their phones in the past month to get up-to-the-minute traffic or public transit information: 31% vs. 16%.  People living in higher income households are more likely than the less well-off to have used their cell phones in the past month for these purposes. And people with higher levels of education are often more likely than those with lesser levels of education to have used their cells for these reasons. In addition, rural cell users are less likely than suburban and urban users to have done some of the just- in-time searches in the past month. Rural residents are less likely than others to use their cells for just-in-time information % of cell owners in each group who have performed these real-time activities in the previous 30 days Urban Suburban Rural 35% Solve an unexpected problem 37% 28% Decide whether or not to visit a business, such as 32% 34% restaurant 17% 28% Look up something to settle an argument 28% 20% 26% Look up sports score 23% 15% 23% Get up-to-the minute traffic or public transit info 20% 11% 21% Get help in an emergency situation 20% 15% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% Source: Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Mobile Survey, March 15-April 3, 2012. N for entire survey = 2,254 respondents age 18 older; N=1,954 for cell owners; N=904 for smartphone owners; N=1,050 for other cell phone owners. Interviews were conducted in English and Spanish and on landline and cells. The just-in-time information searches discussed above are just one way in which cell owners are using their phones to access detailed information and advanced applications through their mobile devices. We asked owners of cell phones who get email, have apps, or access the internet on their phones several questions about their general use of their phones. Some 65% of smartphone owners say they have used their phone to get turn-by-turn navigation or directions while driving, with 15% doing so on a typical day. pewinternet.org 8
  • 9. About Pew Internet The Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project is an initiative of the Pew Research Center, a nonprofit “fact tank” that provides information on the issues, attitudes, and trends shaping America and the world. The Pew Internet Project explores the impact of the internet on children, families, communities, the work place, schools, health care and civic/political life. The Project is nonpartisan and takes no position on policy issues. Support for the Project is provided by The Pew Charitable Trusts. More information is available at www.pewinternet.org Survey questions Spring Tracking Survey 2012 Final Topline 04/10/2012 Data for March 15–April 3, 2012 Princeton Survey Research Associates International for the Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project Sample: n=2,254 national adults, age 18 and older, including 903 cell phone interviews Interviewing dates: 03.15.2012 – 04.03.2012 Margin of error is plus or minus 2 percentage points for results based on Total [n=2,254] Margin of error is plus or minus 3 percentage points for results based on internet users [n=1,803] Margin of error is plus or minus 3 percentage points for results based on cell phone owners [n=1,954] Margin of error is plus or minus 3 percentage points for results based on cell phone owners who text message [n=1,395] Margin of error is plus or minus 4 percentage points for results based on those who use the internet or email on their cell phone or download apps to their cell phone [n=953] Margin of error is plus or minus 4 percentage points for results based on those who use the internet or email on their cell phone [n=929] Margin of error is plus or minus 4 percentage points for results based on those who download apps to their cell phone [n=714] Q10 Pease tell me if you happen to have each of the following items, or not. Do you have... [INSERT ITEMS IN ORDER]? A cell phone or a Blackberry or iPhone or other device that is also a cell phone3 3 Question was asked of landline sample only. Results shown here have been recalculated to include cell phone sample in the "Yes" percentage. In past polls, question was sometimes asked as an independent question and sometimes as an item in a series. In January 2010, question wording was “Do you have...a cell phone or a Blackberry or iPhone or other handheld device that is also a cell phone.” In Dec 2008, Nov 2008, May 2008, January 2005 and Nov 23-30 2004, question wording was "Do you happen to have a cell phone?" In August 2008, July 2008 and January 2008, question wording was "Do you have a cell phone, or a Blackberry or other device that pewinternet.org 9
  • 10. Current 88 12 * * February 2012 88 12 0 * December 2011 87 13 0 * August 2011 84 15 * * May 2011 83 17 * 0 January 2011 84 16 * * December 2010 81 19 * * November 2010 82 18 0 * September 2010 85 15 * * May 2010 82 18 * 0 January 2010 80 20 0 * December 2009 83 17 0 * September 2009 84 15 * * April 2009 85 15 * * Dec 2008 84 16 * * July 2008 82 18 * -- May 2008 78 22 * 0 April 2008 78 22 * -- January 2008 77 22 * -- Dec 2007 75 25 * -- Sept 2007 78 22 * -- April 2006 73 27 * -- January 2005 66 34 * -- November 23-30, 2004 65 35 * -- Q14 Some cell phones are called “smartphones” because of certain features they have. Is your cell phone a smartphone or not, or are you not sure? Based on cell phone owners May current Feb 2012 2011 % 46 Yes, is a smartphone 45 33 44 No, is not a smartphone 46 53 10 Not sure 8 14 * Refused * * [n=1,954] [n=1,961] [n=1,914] Q15 Which of the following best describes the type of cell phone you have? Is it an iPhone, a Blackberry, an Android phone, a Windows phone, or something else?4 Based on cell phone owners current fEB 2012 Dec 2011 May 2011 % 20 iPhone 19 15 10 5 Blackberry 6 8 10 22 Android 20 20 15 is also a cell phone?" In April 2008, Dec 2007, Sept 2007 and April 2006, question wording was “Do you have a cell phone?” Beginning December 2007, question/item was not asked of the cell phone sample, but results shown here reflect Total combined Landline and cell phone sample. 4 Prior to April 2012, question wording was slightly different: “Which of the following best describes the type of cell phone you have? Is it an iPhone, a Blackberry, an Android phone, a Windows phone, a Palm, or something else?” pewinternet.org 10
  • 11. 2 Windows phone 2 2 2 n/a Palm 1 2 2 16 Basic cell phone – unspecified (VOL.) 16 18 8 7 Samsung – unspecified (VOL.) 8 7 7 5 LG – unspecified (VOL.) 5 4 5 4 Flip phone – unspecified (VOL.) 4 6 3 2 Tracfone (VOL.) 3 2 2 3 Motorola – unspecified (VOL.) 2 2 3 2 Nokia – unspecified (VOL.) 1 2 2 1 Pantech – unspecified (VOL.) 1 1 1 7 Something else (SPECIFY) 6 7 16 5 Don’t know 4 4 13 * Refused * * 1 [n=1,954] [n=1,961] [n=2,771] [n=1,914] Q23 Thinking of some of the things you have done recently with your cell phone... In the last 30 days, have you used your cell phone to [INSERT ITEMS; RANDOMIZE]? Based on cell phone owners [N=1,954] YES NO DON’T KNOW REFUSED a. Look something up to help settle an argument 27 73 * * or disagreement you were having b. Coordinate a gathering, meeting or get- 41 59 0 * together c. Solve an unexpected problem for yourself or 35 64 1 * someone else 19 80 * * d. Get help in an emergency situation 23 77 0 0 e. Look up the score of a sporting event f. Get up-to-the minute traffic or public transit information so you could find the fastest way 20 80 0 * to get somewhere g. Decide whether or not to visit a particular 30 70 * 0 business, such as a restaurant Methodology This report is based on the findings of a survey on Americans' use of the internet. The results in this report are based on data from telephone interviews conducted by Princeton Survey Research Associates International from March 15 to April 3, 2012, among a sample of 2,254 adults, age 18 and older. Telephone interviews were conducted in English and Spanish by landline (1,351) and cell phone (903, including 410 without a landline phone). For results based on the total sample, one can say with 95% confidence that the error attributable to sampling is plus or minus 2.4 percentage points. For pewinternet.org 11
  • 12. results based on internet users5 (n=1,803), the margin of sampling error is plus or minus 2.7 percentage points. In addition to sampling error, question wording and practical difficulties in conducting telephone surveys may introduce some error or bias into the findings of opinion polls. A combination of landline and cellular random digit dial (RDD) samples was used to represent all adults in the continental United States who have access to either a landline or cellular telephone. Both samples were provided by Survey Sampling International, LLC (SSI) according to PSRAI specifications. Numbers for the landline sample were selected with probabilities in proportion to their share of listed telephone households from active blocks (area code + exchange + two-digit block number) that contained three or more residential directory listings. The cellular sample was not list-assisted, but was drawn through a systematic sampling from dedicated wireless 100-blocks and shared service 100-blocks with no directory-listed landline numbers. New sample was released daily and was kept in the field for at least five days. The sample was released in replicates, which are representative subsamples of the larger population. This ensures that complete call procedures were followed for the entire sample. At least 7 attempts were made to complete an interview at a sampled telephone number. The calls were staggered over times of day and days of the week to maximize the chances of making contact with a potential respondent. Each number received at least one daytime call in an attempt to find someone available. For the landline sample, interviewers asked to speak with the youngest adult male or female currently at home based on a random rotation. If no male/female was available, interviewers asked to speak with the youngest adult of the other gender. For the cellular sample, interviews were conducted with the person who answered the phone. Interviewers verified that the person was an adult and in a safe place before administering the survey. Cellular sample respondents were offered a post-paid cash incentive for their participation. All interviews completed on any given day were considered to be the final sample for that day. Weighting is generally used in survey analysis to compensate for sample designs and patterns of non-response that might bias results. A two-stage weighting procedure was used to weight this dual- frame sample. The first-stage corrected for different probabilities of selection associated with the number of adults in each household and each respondent’s telephone usage patterns.6 This weighting also adjusts for the overlapping landline and cell sample frames and the relative sizes of each frame and each sample. The second stage of weighting balances sample demographics to population parameters. The sample is balanced to match national population parameters for sex, age, education, race, Hispanic origin, region (U.S. Census definitions), population density, and telephone usage. The Hispanic origin was split out based on nativity; U.S born and non-U.S. born. The White, non-Hispanic subgroup is also balanced on age, education and region. The basic weighting parameters came from a special analysis of the Census Bureau’s 2011 Annual Social and Economic Supplement (ASEC) that included all households in the United States. The population density parameter was derived from Census 2000 data. The cell phone usage parameter came from an analysis of the July-December 2010 National Health Interview Survey.7 Following is the full disposition of all sampled telephone numbers: 5 Internet user definition includes those who access the internet on their cell phones or other mobile handheld device. 6 i.e., whether respondents have only a landline telephone, only a cell phone, or both kinds of telephone. 7 Blumberg SJ, Luke JV. Wireless substitution: Early release of estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, July-December, 2010. National Center for Health Statistics. June 2011. pewinternet.org 12
  • 13. Table 2:Sample Disposition Landline Cell 33,738 22,143 Total Numbers Dialed 1,502 332 Non-residential 1,491 45 Computer/Fax 8 ---- Cell phone 15,401 8,237 Other not working 2,746 404 Additional projected not working 12,590 13,126 Working numbers 37.3% 59.3% Working Rate 915 135 No Answer / Busy 3,472 4,465 Voice Mail 66 5 Other Non-Contact 8,137 8,521 Contacted numbers 64.6% 64.9% Contact Rate 523 1,382 Callback 6,161 5,654 Refusal 1,453 1,485 Cooperating numbers 17.9% 17.4% Cooperation Rate 52 43 Language Barrier ---- 498 Child's cell phone 1,401 944 Eligible numbers 96.4% 63.6% Eligibility Rate 50 41 Break-off 1,351 903 Completes 96.4% 95.7% Completion Rate 11.1% 10.8% Response Rate The disposition reports all of the sampled telephone numbers ever dialed from the original telephone number samples. The response rate estimates the fraction of all eligible respondents in the sample that were ultimately interviewed. At PSRAI it is calculated by taking the product of three component rates: o Contact rate – the proportion of working numbers where a request for interview was made o Cooperation rate – the proportion of contacted numbers where a consent for interview was at least initially obtained, versus those refused o Completion rate – the proportion of initially cooperating and eligible interviews that were completed Thus the response rate for the landline sample was 11 percent. The response rate for the cellular sample was 11 percent. pewinternet.org 13