Workshop for students at the Graduate School of Library and Information Science, Simmons College, Boston, MA.

1. http://www.flickr.com/photos/davekellam/13728964/,
photo by Dave Kellam, words by Karin Dalziel 1

2. 2

3. Wikipedia, Comparison of reference management software,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_reference_management_sof
tware and see also Martin Fenner’s Reference Manager Overview,
http://blogs.plos.org/mfenner/reference-manager-overview/
3

4. reference
management
cloud social
computing networking
zotero
4

5. Zotero and your library
are specific to machine
unless you sync
5

6. bottom of Firefox
library
citations record
tags
6

7. folders
7

8. if enabled
8

9. record in
amazon
9

10. record in
opac
10

11. multiple
records
11

12. record in
indexing service
12

13. multiple
records
13

14. records in
Google Scholar
14

15. blog posting
15

16. any web
page
16

17. highlighted
content
17

18. YouTube video
18

19. flickr image
19

20. multiple images
20

21. manually create
new record
21

22. add standalone
or child note
attachments
22

23. 23

24. 24

25. 25

26. 26

27. good for export
27

28. you can also drag and
drop into
Word, Gdocs, OpenOffi
ce 28

29. Anderson, J. D., & Hofmann, M. A. (2006). A fully faceted syntax for Library of Congress
subject headings. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 43(1), 7-38.
Broughton, V. (2006). The need for a faceted classification as the basis of all methods of
information retrieval. Aslib Proceedings, 58(1), 49-72.
Broughton, V., & Slavic, A. (2007). Building a faceted classification for the humanities:
Principles and procedures. Journal of Documentation, 63(5), 727-754.
Ellis, D., & Vasconcelos, A. (2000). The relevance of facet analysis for World Wide Web subject
organization and searching. Journal of Internet Cataloging, 2(3/4), 97-114.
Foskett, A. C. (2000). The future of faceted classification. In The future of classification (pp. 69-
80). Brookfield, VT: Gower.
Franklin, R. A. (2003). Re-inventing subject access for the semantic Web. Online Information
Review, 27(2), 94-101.
Hagedorn, K., Chapman, S., & Newman, D. (2007). Enhancing search and browse using
automated clustering of subject metadata. D-Lib Magazine, 13(7/8). Retrieved from
http://www.dlib.org/dlib/july07/hagedorn/07hagedorn.html.
Lapointe, F., & Legendre, P. (1994). A classification of pure malt scotch whiskies. Applied
Statistics, 43(1), 237-257.
Wilson, K. (2006). OPAC 2.0: Next generation online library catalogues ride the Web 2.0 wave!
Information Technology and Libraries, 128–139.
29

30. backing up
30

31. 31

32. but, filed under “a”
32

33. editing online
33

34. 34

35. used for course
support
35

36. Twitter,
Facebook,
etc.
36

37. Chrome
connector for
standalone
37

38. Web app in iPad,
iPhone, mobile site
38

39. True mobile apps
ZotPad
$9.99
39

40. plugins
et al.
40

41. plugins
et al.
41

42. http://www.zotero.org/support/screencast_t
utorials/zotero_and_word
42

43. video tutorials
43

44. http://purchase.libguides.com/zotero
44