1. New technologies in primary
English teacher training
Shona Whyte
Equipe LiDida
Bases, Corpus, Langage, UMR6039
Université de Nice-Sophia Antipolis
51e Congrès De La SAES, Atelier 24 - Didactique Et Acquisition Des Langues, 21/05/11
1
3. 1. ICT
new technologies are the only
salvation for FL teaching in
French schools
Shona WHYTE, Nice whyte@unice.fr efl.unice.fr
3
4. BUT
only if teacher cognition
research informs training
Shona WHYTE, Nice whyte@unice.fr efl.unice.fr
4
5. AND
this research can inform wider
questions of classroom
acquisition
Shona WHYTE, Nice whyte@unice.fr efl.unice.fr
5
6. Learning to teach with videoconferencing in
primary FL classrooms
✤ Special issue of ReCALL on
CALL and CMC Teacher
Education research: enduring
questions, emerging
methodologies
✤ Edited by Nicolas Guichon and
Mirjam Hauck
✤ September 2011
Shona WHYTE, Nice whyte@unice.fr efl.unice.fr
6
9. Background
Context
Literature
✤ generalist teachers
✤ Borg (2009): teacher cognition
✤ whole-class teaching, rote learning
✤ Cutrim Schmid (2008): IWB for EFL
✤ CER
✤ Develotte, Guichon, Kern (2007): VC
✤ centralised recruitment/promotion
✤ Gruson (2011): VC in French primary
EFL
✤ masters training
Shona WHYTE, Nice whyte@unice.fr efl.unice.fr
9
10. Project “recipient” “resource”
✤ videoconferencing in English between W V
pairs of primary classes in the Alpes-
Maritimes
✤ 8 (6) generalist primary teachers; 2 teacher C E
trainers; researcher as participant observer
✤ “resource” (experienced EFL teacher) to
“recipient” (novice EFL teacher) class
J M
✤ 6 months: initial training => first VC
sessions (Jan-June 10)
Shona WHYTE, Nice whyte@unice.fr efl.unice.fr
10
11. Project: data
✤ pre-training questionnaire (FL, ICT experience)
✤ video recordings of VC sessions
✤ learner focus-group interviews after VC sessions
✤ learner drawings of VC experience
✤ teacher and trainer contributions to asynchronous discussion group
✤ video-stimulated recall interviews
Shona WHYTE, Nice whyte@unice.fr efl.unice.fr
11
12. Project: VC set-up
✤ whole-class to whole-class communication
✤ IWB + VC equipment at front of class; panel
of 4-6 speakers at front of class; other pupils
observing from desks
✤ session format: opening ritual (date, weather)
> vocabulary review > one or two games
(bingo, hangman) > story and/or song >
close (class debriefing)
Shona WHYTE, Nice whyte@unice.fr efl.unice.fr
12
13. Project: VSR interviews
✤ VC videos segmented into activities (opening
ritual, games) and shared online
✤ teachers invited to select successful/failed/
puzzling episodes
✤ 45-90 minute interview with researcher
Shona WHYTE, Nice whyte@unice.fr efl.unice.fr
13
14. Project: participant profiles
E: “since it’s a
new thing I can’t ✤ coding of interview transcripts
rely on
references. Even ✤ teacher orientation:
if you look on M: “they only saw
internet there’s ✤ teacher (E) the fun side [of the
no sample lesson ✤ teaching (J, W) IWB] and they
plan” hadn’t noticed the
✤ learner (V)
concept we wanted
✤ learning (M) them to learn”
V: “they want to ✤ technology (C)
show what they
know”
Shona WHYTE, Nice whyte@unice.fr efl.unice.fr
14
15. Project: participant profiles
“recipient” “resource”
W teaching V learner
What different
concerns do teachers
C technology E teacher have?
J teaching M learning
Shona WHYTE, Nice whyte@unice.fr efl.unice.fr
15
16. Project: teacher concerns
1. effective VC teaching
How do different
teacher concerns affect
2. second language learning
classroom interaction?
3. teacher role and learner
participation
Shona WHYTE, Nice whyte@unice.fr efl.unice.fr
16
17. Findings (1) Effective VC teaching
Hangman
✤ selected by teacher J as
successful activity
✤ remote class sets word
(topic: emotions)
✤ speakers in J’s class take
turns to guess a letter
Shona WHYTE, Nice whyte@unice.fr efl.unice.fr
17
19. Findings (2) Second language learning
Bingo
✤ selected by teacher J as
unsuccessful activity
✤ speakers in J’s class take turns
to call out words (body parts)
✤ other learners in both classes
check off
Shona WHYTE, Nice whyte@unice.fr efl.unice.fr
19
20. Findings (2) Second language learning
Teachers focus on:
✤ “what works”
✤ collaboration, teamwork
✤ learner autonomy
Shona WHYTE, Nice whyte@unice.fr efl.unice.fr
20
21. Findings (2) Second language learning
“Maintenant pour l'année
prochaine c'est ça, c'est à dire
NOT
avoir ce, ce, ben ce vocabulaire
c'est pas ce vocabulaire mais, cette
✤ L2 difficulties
capacité à dire […] je voudrais
✤ opportunities for FL learning que ça ils l'aient, pour pouvoir se
dégager justement de ces
✤ reflection on teaching situations, mais, en anglais” (M)
Shona WHYTE, Nice whyte@unice.fr efl.unice.fr
21
23. Findings (3)
Teacher & learner participation
Consequences
✤ little or no spontaneous learner-learner interaction in FL
✤ memorised routines in rehearsed settings
✤ learner stress in triangular settings
Shona WHYTE, Nice whyte@unice.fr efl.unice.fr
23
24. Conclusion
Teachers can and
do self-train with new
✤ researcher participation technology, but cannot identify the
promotes sharing, affordances of the new tools unless they
communication, and receive help in identifying effective language
reflection learning practices. Conversely, it is difficult for
trainers to discover and pass on such useful
✤ specific FL teacher practices without having participated in
specifically directed technology training
training is essential
themselves in the first
place.
✤ technology training
must be embedded in
FL context
Shona WHYTE, Nice whyte@unice.fr efl.unice.fr
24
25. research can inform
training; development of
training resources can
inform research
http://unt.unice.fr/uoh/learn_teach_FL/
Shona WHYTE, Nice whyte@unice.fr efl.unice.fr
25
26. ✤ Borg, S. (2009). Teacher cognition and language education. London: Continuum.
✤ Cutrim Schmid, E. (2008) Potential pedagogical benefits and drawbacks of multimedia
use in the English language classroom equipped with interactive whiteboard
technology, Computers & Education, 51: 1553–1568.
✤ Develotte, C., Guichon, N., and Kern, R. (2007) «Allo Berkeley? Ici Lyon... Vous nous
voyez bien? Etude d'un dispositif d’enseignement- apprentissage en ligne synchrone
franco-américain à travers les discours de ses usagers. ALSIC, 11 (2): 129-156.
✤ Gruson, B. (2011). Analyse comparative d’une situation de communication orale en
classe ordinaire et lors d’une séance en visioconférence. Distance et Savoirs, 8: 395-423.
✤ Whyte, S. (to appear). Learning to teach with videoconferencing in primary EFL
classrooms. ReCALL.
Shona WHYTE, Nice whyte@unice.fr efl.unice.fr
26