SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 86
Nashua School District
   Leadership Development
Leadership Development
   Setting the Context
   Supporting the Goals
   Does Leadership Matter?
       Are leaders crucial to support achievement?
       How do we build leaders to support achievement?
       How do we challenge our leaders?
   Student Achievement
       Where we are and where we need to be
   Leadership Initiatives
   Laying the Cornerstones for Leadership
   Opportunities for Leadership Development
Leadership Development

SETTING THE CONTEXT
Setting the Context:
               District Goals
1.   To increase academic achievement for all
     students while recognizing the diverse needs of
     our students
2.   To establish and communicate an accountability
     system
3.   To align policies, procedures, and resources
4.   To establish an assessment process
5.   To provide a positive climate and a safe
     educational environment
Leadership Development

SUPPORTING THE GOALS
Setting the Context:
              Supporting the Goals
   Does leadership matter?
   Do beliefs make a difference?
       Is our business growth and development?
       Can all children learn?
       If we seek student proficiency,
          What is teacher proficiency?
          What is administrator proficiency?

   What is a successful school?
Leadership Development

DOES LEADERSHIP MATTER?
The Challenging Question:
       Instructional Leadership
   Principals are held accountable for student
    achievement; and yet,
   ―The direct effect of principals on student
    achievement is near zero.‖
          Ross and Gray, School Leadership and Student
           Achievement. 2002


   Do you believe this?
   And if you do, why are you a Principal
    [or, a District Administrator]?
Instructional Leadership Model
Community                          Instructional Climate




Personal
Beliefs and     Principal Leadership                       Student Outcomes
Experiences




Institutional                      Instructional Organization
Context
Instructional Leadership Model
   Instructional Climate
       School mission
       Student opportunity to learn
       Teacher expectations for student learning
   Instructional Organization
       Opportunities for teaching and learning
       Teaming students and teachers for
        instructional delivery and curricular
        monitoring
Leadership
   Advice for Urban School Leaders
       Do what you say you’re going to do.

       Know the work to lead the work.

       Do not be afraid of accountability.
            Tom Payzant, former Superintendent, Boston
Leadership Development

STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT:
WHERE WE ARE AND WHERE
WE NEED TO BE
Leadership Development

STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT:
ATTENDANCE
Nashua Attendance 2007-08
                                                         Attendance By School
                                   100
PERCENTAGE OF DAYS IN ATTENDANCE




                                   95



                                   90


                                   85
                                                   96   97   96   96                            96                  95        96
                                              94                       95   95        95             95                  95
                                                                                 94        94             92   93
                                   80
                                         87

                                   75


                                   70
                                         ALT AM BH      BI   BR   CH CR EMS FG FMS LG MD MP NHN NHS NS PMS SH
                                                                                 SCHOOL
Nashua Attendance 2007-08
                                             % Students with >30 Absences

             40%
                   37%

             35%
                          ALT: 33 students
             30%


             25%
% Students




             20%

                                                                     North: 246 students      South: 293 students
             15%
                                                                                           13% 13%
                                                                 Ledge St: 32 students
             10%
                                                                        6%
                                                                 5%                                       5%
                         4%
                                                   3% 3%
             5%
                                        2%                                         2%                2%
                              1% 1%           2%            1%               1%                                 1%
             0%
                   ALT   AM   BH   BI   BR    CH   CR EMS   FG   FMS    LG    MD   MP NHN NHS        NS   PMS   SH
                                                            School
Leadership Questions
   Where we are and where we need to be
       Student Attendance
           Is it acceptable
                That 293 students at South miss more than 30 days of
                 school a year?
                That 246 students at North miss more than 30 days of
                 school a year?
                That 32 elementary students at Ledge St. miss more
                 than 30 days of school a year?
Leadership Development

STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT:
CLIMATE
High School Climate
                     High School Students Involved in Misconduct
               450
                                                              448
               400
                                       402
               350     385
               300
No. Students




               250                                                  NHN
                                              249                   NHS
               200

               150

               100

               50

                0
                             2006-07                2007-08
High School Climate
                 Students Involved in Fighting and Inappropriate Contact
               160
                                                                159
               140

                       135
               120
                                                121
                                        114
No. Students




               100

                                                                           NHN
               80
                                                                           NHS

               60

               40

               20


                0
                              2006-07                 2007-08
High School Climate
                      Incidents of High School Fighting and Inappropriate Contact
                280


                240                                                     254

                          226
                200

                                                        188
No. Incidents




                160
                                          167                                       NHN
                                                                                    NHS
                120


                80


                40


                 0
                                2006-07                       2007-08
High School Climate
       HIGH SCHOOL DISCIPLINE HISTORY
                         Number of Suspensions
1200


1000                                                                     1026
                                                                   916
800                                                          848
       760
600                       675
                                           603
             538   568                                567

400                             442


200


  0
                   NHN                                       NHS

                         03     04    05         06         07
Leadership Questions
   Where we are and where we need to be
       High School Climate
            Is it acceptable
                 That 18% of our students were involved in misconduct
                  incidents last year?
                 That 7% of our students were involved in fighting
                  incidents last year?
                 That 1500 suspensions occurred at the high schools last
                  year?
Leadership Development

STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT:
STATE TESTING
NECAP Math 2007
   Elementary Proficiency and Poverty
100%
90%       84%
                81%                                 81%
80%
                      78%
                            74%
                                                                70% 69%
70% 63%
                                              58%         60%
60%
                                  52%
50%
                                        42%
40%
                                                                          Proficient
30%
                                                                          SES
20%
10%
 0%
NECAP Reading 2007
   Elementary Proficiency and Poverty
100%
90%       87%
                82%
                      79% 78%                     79%         78%
80%
                                            71%                     71%
70%
    68%
                                59%                     57%
60%
50%                                   47%

40%
                                                                          Proficient
30%
                                                                          SES
20%
10%
 0%
NECAP Writing 2007
   Elementary Proficiency and Poverty
100%
90%
80%
70%
          68%
                      63%
60%
                                              58%
                            53%                           54% 52%
                51%                                 51%
50%
    48%
                                        39%
40%                               33%                               33%
                                                                          Proficient
30%
                                                                          SES
20%
10%
 0%
NECAP Math 2007
            Elementary Not Proficient
60%                                       57%

50%                                 47%
                                                41%
                                                            39%
40%   36%
                                                                  29%   30%
30%
                              25%
                        21%
20%               18%                                 18%
            15%

10%


0%
NECAP Reading 2007
            Elementary Not Proficient
60%
                                          52%
50%
                                                            42%
                                    40%
40%

      31%
30%                                             28%                     28%

                        20%   21%                     20%         21%
20%               17%
            12%
10%


0%
NECAP Writing 2007
            Elementary Not Proficient
70%                                 66%                                 66%
                                          60%
60%
      51%
50%               48%         46%                     48%         47%
                                                            45%
                                                41%
40%                     36%
            31%
30%

20%

10%

0%
Nashua District Test Results
                          District NECAP 2005
                          Math Proficiency by Grade
             80
             70
             60
% Students




             50
                                                          Proficient
             40
                                                          Not Proficient
             30
             20
             10
              0
                  3   4     5           6   7         8
                                Grade
Nashua District Test Results
                          District NECAP 2006
                          Math Proficiency by Grade
             80
             70
             60
% Students




             50
                                                          Proficient
             40
                                                          Not Proficient
             30
             20
             10
              0
                  3   4     5           6   7         8
                                Grade
Nashua District Test Results
                          District NECAP 2007
                          Math Proficiency by Grade
             80
             70
             60
% Students




             50
                                                           Proficient
             40
                                                           Not Proficient
             30
             20
             10
              0
                  3   4   5     6      7     8        11
                              Grade
Leadership Questions
   Where we are and where we need to be
       NECAP Math Testing
           Is it acceptable
                That 3 out of 10 students are not proficient in math in
                 Grade 5?
                That 4 out of 10 students are not proficient in math in
                 Grade 8?
                That 7 out of 10 students are not proficient in math in
                 Grade 11?
Nashua District Test Results
                              District NECAP 2007
                           Math Students in Poverty by Grade
             100


              80
% Students




              60
                                                               Proficient
                                                               Not Proficient
              40

              20


               0
                   3   4       5      6     7     8     11
                                    Grade
Nashua District Test Results
                           District NECAP 2007
                       Math Advanced Students by Grade
             100


              80
% Students




              60
                                                          Advanced
                                                          Others
              40

              20


               0
                   3   4    5      6     7     8     11
                                 Grade
Nashua District Test Results
                           District NECAP 2005
                          Reading Proficiency by Grade
             70

             60

             50
% Students




             40                                          Proficient
             30                                          Not Proficient

             20

             10

              0
                  3   4       5           6   7     8
                                  Grade
Nashua District Test Results
                           District NECAP 2006
                          Reading Proficiency by Grade
             70

             60

             50
% Students




             40                                          Proficient
             30                                          Not Proficient

             20

             10

              0
                  3   4       5           6   7     8
                                  Grade
Nashua District Test Results
                           District NECAP 2007
                          Reading Proficiency by Grade
             80
             70
             60
% Students




             50
                                                         Proficient
             40
                                                         Not Proficient
             30
             20
             10
              0
                  3   4     5     6     7      8    11
                                Grade
Leadership Questions
   Where we are and where we need to be
       NECAP Reading Testing
           Is it acceptable
                That 3 out of 10 students are not proficient in reading in
                 Grade 5?
                That 4 out of 10 students are not proficient in reading in
                 Grade 8?
                That 5 out of 10 students are not proficient in reading in
                 Grade 11?
Nashua District Test Results
                          District NECAP 2007
                      Reading Students in Poverty by Grade
             70

             60

             50
% Students




             40                                              Proficient
             30                                              Not Proficient

             20

             10

              0
                  3   4    5      6     7      8     11
                                Grade
Nashua District Test Results
                           District NECAP 2007
                       Reading Advanced Students by Grade
             100


              80
% Students




              60
                                                            Advanced
                                                            Others
              40

              20


               0
                   3   4      5     6      7     8     11
                                  Grade
Leadership Development

STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT:
HIGH SCHOOL FINAL EXAMS
High School Final Exams
                            Math Department Nashua North HS
                                Final Exams Semester Two 2007-08
                240


                200


                160
Student Count




                                                                         A
                                                                         B
                120                                                      C
                                 211        212                          D
                                                                         F
                 80                                                157
                                                         136
                      119
                 40


                  0
                       A         B           C             D        F
                                           GRADE
High School Final Exams
                            Math Department Nashua South HS
                               Final Exams Semester Two 2007-08
                350

                300

                250
Student Count




                                                                        A
                200                                                     B
                                                                        C
                150                                               320   D
                                                                        F

                100              200        193         191

                 50
                       81
                  0
                       A          B          C           D         F
                                           GRADE
Leadership Questions
   Where we are and where we need to be
       High School Math Final Exams:
            Is it acceptable that 19% of our math students at
             North failed their final exam?
            Is it acceptable that 35% received a D or F?


            Is it acceptable that 33% of our math students at
             South failed their final exam?
            Is it acceptable that 52% received a D or F?
School Climate and Leadership Development

STAFF RESPONSES TO MY
ASPIRATIONS SURVEY
My Voice Staff Survey: Leadership & Responsibility
            “I see myself as a leader.”
My Voice Staff Survey: Leadership & Responsibility
       “My colleagues see me as a leader.”
My Voice Staff Survey: Leadership & Responsibility
    “I am involved in school-wide decisions.”
My Voice Staff Survey: Leadership & Responsibility
“I know the goals my school is working on this year.”
Leadership Questions
 Where we are and where we need to be
   Staff responses to Aspirations Survey:
      Is it acceptable that 25% of our staff do not view
       themselves as leaders in our elementary schools?
      Is it acceptable that 50% do not believe their
       colleagues view them as leaders?
      Is it acceptable that 60% of our staff do not feel
       they are involved in school decisions?
      Is it acceptable that between 40 and 50% of our
       staff do not know their school goals?
Leadership Development

LEADERSHIP INITIATIVES
Dr. Ron Krause – July 2008

A PRACTICAL APPROACH TO
EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Conceptual Framework
   If you are involved in building and
    managing an organization……it is of
    critical importance to create tangible
    mechanisms aligned to preserve the core
    and stimulate progress.

   Built To Last
VALUES – What’s Important
   What are your values?
   Discover the values of those whom you wish to
    lead
   Discover the organization’s values
   Discover your mutual values
   Make all decisions based on values
   The strength of the organization is the strength
    of shared values
   Drive home the organization’s values every time
    you speak
What do Leaders Talk About?
   They talk about what’s important around here

   They talk about where are we headed

   They talk about risk

   They talk about what motivates people
Leadership and Change
Attitude:     Ability is what you are capable of doing; motivation
  determines what you do; ATTITUDE determines how well you do it.

Sensitivity: ―The art of progress is to preserve order amid
  change‖ Whitehead

Style:  ―The true measure of a person is how he/she treats
  someone who can do him/her absolutely no good‖ Samuel Johnson

Salesmanship:         ―Enthusiasm is the very propeller of progress‖
  B.C. Forbes
Leadership & Change
   Motivation:      ―Management by objective works, if
    you know the objectives‖ Peter Drucker

   Communication:           ―Understanding is a two-way
    street‖ Eleanor Roosevelt

   Support:       ―If anything goes bad, I did it. If anything
    goes semi-good, then we did it. If anything goes real
    good, then you did it. That’s all it takes to get people to
    win football games for you.‖ Bear Bryant
Leadership & Change

   Drive:      ― Leadership: The art of getting someone
    else to do something you want done because he wants
    to do it.‖ Dwight Eisenhower

   Integrity:     ― A lie can travel halfway around the
    world while the truth is putting on its shoes.‖ Mark
    Twain

   Responsibility:         ―The quality of a leader is
    reflected in the standards they set for themselves.‖
    Abraham Lincoln
OUTCOMES
   Alignment – sense of purpose/energy
   Empowerment – responsibility
   Respect – shared participation
   Interdependence - connected system
   Innovation – divergent ideas
   Commitment – buy-in
Dr. Daniel Goleman

LEADERSHIP THAT GETS
RESULTS
Leadership That Gets Results
   Six Drivers of Climate
       Flexibility
            How free employees feel to innovate
             unencumbered by red tape
       Responsibility
            The sense of responsibility that employees have to
             the organization
       Standards
            The level of standards that people set
Leadership That Gets Results
   Rewards
        The sense of accuracy about performance
         feedback and aptness of rewards
   Clarity
        The clarity people have about mission and values
   Commitment
        The level of commitment to a common purpose
Leadership That Gets Results
   Six Leadership Styles*
       Coercive
       Authoritative
       Affiliative
       Democratic
       Pacesetting
       Coaching
* From Hay/McBer executive research
Leadership That Gets Results
   Coercive leaders
       Demand immediate compliance
   Authoritative leaders
       Mobilize people toward a vision
   Affiliative leaders
       Create emotional bonds and harmony
Leadership That Gets Results
   Democratic leaders
       Build consensus through participaton
   Pacesetting leaders
       Expect excellence and self-direction
   Coaching leaders
       Develop people for the future
Leadership That Gets Results
                 Coercive   Authoritative   Affiliative   Democratic   Pacesetting   Coaching


Flexibility      -.28          .32            .27           .28          -.07         .17
Responsibility   -.37          .21            .16           .23          .04          .08
Standards         .02          .38            .31           .22          -.27         .39
Rewards          -.18          .54            .48           .42          -.29         .43
Clarity          -.11          .44            .37           .35          -.28         .38
Commitment       -.13          .35            .34           .26          -.20         .27
Overall Impact   -.26          .54            .46           .43          -.25         .42
Leadership That Gets Results
                  Coercive         Authoritative         Affiliative       Democratic Pacesetting              Coaching

The leader’s     Demands           Mobilizes people     Creates            Forges            Set high         Develops
modus            immediate         toward a vision      harmony and        consensus         standards for    people for the
operandi         compliance                             builds             through           performance      future
                                                        emotional          participation
                                                        bonds
The style in a   ―Do what I        ―Come with me.‖      ―People come       ―What do you      ―Do as I do,     ―Try this.‖
phrase           tell you.‖                             first.‖            think?‖           now.‖

Underlying       Drive to          Self-confidence,     Empathy,           Collaboration,    Conscientiousn   Developing
emotional        achieve,          empathy, change      building           team              ess, drive to    others,
intelligence     initiative,       catalyst             relationships,     leadership,       achieve,         empathy, self-
competencies     self-control                           communication      communication     initiative       awareness


When the style   In a crisis, to   When changes         To heal rifts in   To build buy-in   To get quick     To help an
works best       kick start a      require a new        a team or to       or consensus,     results from a   employee
                 turnaround,       vision, or when a    motivate           or to get input   highly           improve
                 or with           clear direction is   people during      from valuable     motivated and    performance
                 problem           needed               stressful          employees         competent        to develop
                 employees                              circumstances                        team             long-term
                                                                                                              strengths
Overall impact   Negative          Most strongly        Positive           Positive          Negative         Positive
on climate                         positive
James Mealey, Chief Operating Officer, Nashua School District

THE CHANGE PROCESS
The Ten Commandments of
         Implementing Change
1.    Analyze the organization and its need for change
2.    Create a common direction
3.    Separate from the past
4.    Create a sense of urgency
5.    Support strong leadership roles
6.    Line up political sponsorship
7.    Craft an implementation plan
8.    Develop enabling structures
9.    Communicate, involve people, and be honest
10.   Reinforce and institutionalize change
Priorities for Leadership and Organizational Development in Nashua

LAYING THE CORNERSTONES
Laying the Cornerstones
   Cornerstones are foundations of
    organizational direction
        To create and sustain organizational behavior to
         build leadership through the district
        To focus the energy and direction of the internal
         organization of the Nashua School District
        To Identify target areas of human resources
         development to maximize student achievement
        To support the Board of Education goals for the
         Nashua School District
Organizational and Leadership
Cornerstones for the Nashua School District
      Building Leadership
      Shaping Belief
      Creating Achievement
      Celebrating Success
Laying the Cornerstones
   How do we Build Leadership?
       Throughout the district
            In every student, every teacher, every
             administrator, every paraprofessional, every food
             service employee, every custodian, every
             secretary, every bus driver,
       For shared decisions
       For innovative ideas
       For student success and student achievement
Laying the Cornerstones
   How do we Shape Belief?
       In every student, every teacher, every
        administrator, every paraprofessional, every
        food service employee, every custodian, every
        secretary, every bus driver, that
          All students can succeed
          Education is an inalienable right

          Our business is the growth and development of
           children
          Learning takes place every day for everyone
Laying the Cornerstones
   How do we Create Achievement?
       Do we believe that our business in education
        is the growth and development of children?
       Can we commit ourselves to breaking the
        myth that some children are incapable of
        learning at high levels?
       Are we creating opportunities for students to
        demonstrate that they can learn at high
        levels—in every class, every day?
Laying the Cornerstones
   How do we Celebrate Success?
       Are we building a culture of community?
       Are we recognizing the achievements of
        students and staff?
       Do we recognize achievement when we see
        it?
       Is the school a family?
The Four Cornerstones
   What will building the Cornerstones lead
    to?
       Success and achievement for all students, through
         1.   Leadership development

         2.   Accountability for schools
         3.   Human resources professional development
              focused on student learning
         4.   Individual student monitoring reports
1. Leadership Development
   Literacy training for Principals and school
    leaders
   360 leadership institute
   Professional panel presentations by staff
    at Board of Education meetings
   The Efficacy Institute
       Shaping proficiency throughout the
        organization
2. Accountability for Schools
   Develop school report cards
       Establish criteria [examples]
          Attendance
          State test scores [AYP]

          Climate
                 My Voice surveys, School approval standards, Discipline,
                  Staff evaluation
            Student monitoring and improvement
   Set school targets
   Use targets for evaluations
3. Human Resources
        Professional Development
   All kids can learn
       TERC data teams: grade-level and vertical
       CRM literacy training
       Small learning communities
       Efficacy Institute for title schools
       Paraprofessional mentoring
       Principal walkthroughs and feedback
       Understanding of special education
        identification
4. Individual Student Monitoring
   Set criteria for individual monitoring report
   Develop monitoring report
   Each student has monitoring report in
    place by end of 2008-09
   Monitoring report data is used in
    Accountability for Schools
Organizational Cornerstones
    of the Nashua School District
      Supporting District Goals
Leadership Development


                                        Student
                                        Achievement
                           Teacher
                           Leadership

              Principal
              Leadership



 District
 Leadership

Más contenido relacionado

Similar a Leadership Development Nashua, NH

Power presentation ncsu 2
Power presentation ncsu 2Power presentation ncsu 2
Power presentation ncsu 2
EducationNC
 
EOPS-Celebrating 40 Years Of Service
EOPS-Celebrating 40 Years Of ServiceEOPS-Celebrating 40 Years Of Service
EOPS-Celebrating 40 Years Of Service
Nazaryan
 
FMP Northwest Planning Area
FMP Northwest Planning AreaFMP Northwest Planning Area
FMP Northwest Planning Area
psnotebook
 
Annual gathering and fundraising dinner final final
Annual gathering and fundraising dinner final finalAnnual gathering and fundraising dinner final final
Annual gathering and fundraising dinner final final
miacademy
 

Similar a Leadership Development Nashua, NH (20)

Using connect edu student impact data to improve your academy
Using connect edu student impact data to improve your academyUsing connect edu student impact data to improve your academy
Using connect edu student impact data to improve your academy
 
Sample data presentation
Sample data presentationSample data presentation
Sample data presentation
 
Scholarships: Tips and Strategies to Cut College Costs
Scholarships: Tips and Strategies to Cut College CostsScholarships: Tips and Strategies to Cut College Costs
Scholarships: Tips and Strategies to Cut College Costs
 
Student Perception Surveys - Market Research Study
Student Perception Surveys - Market Research StudyStudent Perception Surveys - Market Research Study
Student Perception Surveys - Market Research Study
 
DE-MYSTIFYING THE U.S. NEWS RANKINGS
DE-MYSTIFYING THE U.S. NEWS RANKINGSDE-MYSTIFYING THE U.S. NEWS RANKINGS
DE-MYSTIFYING THE U.S. NEWS RANKINGS
 
Power presentation ncsu 2
Power presentation ncsu 2Power presentation ncsu 2
Power presentation ncsu 2
 
The Chamber's Franklin Initiative
The Chamber's Franklin InitiativeThe Chamber's Franklin Initiative
The Chamber's Franklin Initiative
 
2010-2011 Denton ISD Parent Survey
2010-2011 Denton ISD Parent Survey2010-2011 Denton ISD Parent Survey
2010-2011 Denton ISD Parent Survey
 
APRESENTAÇÃO DO PPP ESCOLA MUN. PROF. LUIZ MARANHÃO FILHO PARTE I - ALUNOS
APRESENTAÇÃO DO PPP ESCOLA MUN. PROF. LUIZ MARANHÃO FILHO PARTE I - ALUNOSAPRESENTAÇÃO DO PPP ESCOLA MUN. PROF. LUIZ MARANHÃO FILHO PARTE I - ALUNOS
APRESENTAÇÃO DO PPP ESCOLA MUN. PROF. LUIZ MARANHÃO FILHO PARTE I - ALUNOS
 
Evaluating Your School Counseling Program: The Risks and the Rewards
Evaluating Your School Counseling Program: The Risks and the RewardsEvaluating Your School Counseling Program: The Risks and the Rewards
Evaluating Your School Counseling Program: The Risks and the Rewards
 
Who are our students
Who are our studentsWho are our students
Who are our students
 
Chancellor Cheek DDDH Presentation
Chancellor Cheek DDDH PresentationChancellor Cheek DDDH Presentation
Chancellor Cheek DDDH Presentation
 
EOPS-Celebrating 40 Years Of Service
EOPS-Celebrating 40 Years Of ServiceEOPS-Celebrating 40 Years Of Service
EOPS-Celebrating 40 Years Of Service
 
The dark future of Vietnamese education
The dark future of Vietnamese educationThe dark future of Vietnamese education
The dark future of Vietnamese education
 
FMP Northwest Planning Area
FMP Northwest Planning AreaFMP Northwest Planning Area
FMP Northwest Planning Area
 
Annual gathering and fundraising dinner final final
Annual gathering and fundraising dinner final finalAnnual gathering and fundraising dinner final final
Annual gathering and fundraising dinner final final
 
November 2020 Division Meeting: "UofSC Community Insights Survey"
November 2020 Division Meeting: "UofSC Community Insights Survey"November 2020 Division Meeting: "UofSC Community Insights Survey"
November 2020 Division Meeting: "UofSC Community Insights Survey"
 
Branum mla 2012
Branum mla 2012Branum mla 2012
Branum mla 2012
 
A needs analysis for information literacy provision for research : a case stu...
A needs analysis for information literacy provision for research : a case stu...A needs analysis for information literacy provision for research : a case stu...
A needs analysis for information literacy provision for research : a case stu...
 
Operational and Financial Review - NAU presentation to ABOR
Operational and Financial Review - NAU presentation to ABOROperational and Financial Review - NAU presentation to ABOR
Operational and Financial Review - NAU presentation to ABOR
 

Último

Salient Features of India constitution especially power and functions
Salient Features of India constitution especially power and functionsSalient Features of India constitution especially power and functions
Salient Features of India constitution especially power and functions
KarakKing
 

Último (20)

How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
 
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning ExhibitSociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
 
HMCS Vancouver Pre-Deployment Brief - May 2024 (Web Version).pptx
HMCS Vancouver Pre-Deployment Brief - May 2024 (Web Version).pptxHMCS Vancouver Pre-Deployment Brief - May 2024 (Web Version).pptx
HMCS Vancouver Pre-Deployment Brief - May 2024 (Web Version).pptx
 
UGC NET Paper 1 Mathematical Reasoning & Aptitude.pdf
UGC NET Paper 1 Mathematical Reasoning & Aptitude.pdfUGC NET Paper 1 Mathematical Reasoning & Aptitude.pdf
UGC NET Paper 1 Mathematical Reasoning & Aptitude.pdf
 
2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx
2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx
2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx
 
Kodo Millet PPT made by Ghanshyam bairwa college of Agriculture kumher bhara...
Kodo Millet  PPT made by Ghanshyam bairwa college of Agriculture kumher bhara...Kodo Millet  PPT made by Ghanshyam bairwa college of Agriculture kumher bhara...
Kodo Millet PPT made by Ghanshyam bairwa college of Agriculture kumher bhara...
 
Application orientated numerical on hev.ppt
Application orientated numerical on hev.pptApplication orientated numerical on hev.ppt
Application orientated numerical on hev.ppt
 
HMCS Max Bernays Pre-Deployment Brief (May 2024).pptx
HMCS Max Bernays Pre-Deployment Brief (May 2024).pptxHMCS Max Bernays Pre-Deployment Brief (May 2024).pptx
HMCS Max Bernays Pre-Deployment Brief (May 2024).pptx
 
Beyond_Borders_Understanding_Anime_and_Manga_Fandom_A_Comprehensive_Audience_...
Beyond_Borders_Understanding_Anime_and_Manga_Fandom_A_Comprehensive_Audience_...Beyond_Borders_Understanding_Anime_and_Manga_Fandom_A_Comprehensive_Audience_...
Beyond_Borders_Understanding_Anime_and_Manga_Fandom_A_Comprehensive_Audience_...
 
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsIntroduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
 
Salient Features of India constitution especially power and functions
Salient Features of India constitution especially power and functionsSalient Features of India constitution especially power and functions
Salient Features of India constitution especially power and functions
 
Understanding Accommodations and Modifications
Understanding  Accommodations and ModificationsUnderstanding  Accommodations and Modifications
Understanding Accommodations and Modifications
 
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdfKey note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
 
80 ĐỀ THI THỬ TUYỂN SINH TIẾNG ANH VÀO 10 SỞ GD – ĐT THÀNH PHỐ HỒ CHÍ MINH NĂ...
80 ĐỀ THI THỬ TUYỂN SINH TIẾNG ANH VÀO 10 SỞ GD – ĐT THÀNH PHỐ HỒ CHÍ MINH NĂ...80 ĐỀ THI THỬ TUYỂN SINH TIẾNG ANH VÀO 10 SỞ GD – ĐT THÀNH PHỐ HỒ CHÍ MINH NĂ...
80 ĐỀ THI THỬ TUYỂN SINH TIẾNG ANH VÀO 10 SỞ GD – ĐT THÀNH PHỐ HỒ CHÍ MINH NĂ...
 
Towards a code of practice for AI in AT.pptx
Towards a code of practice for AI in AT.pptxTowards a code of practice for AI in AT.pptx
Towards a code of practice for AI in AT.pptx
 
Google Gemini An AI Revolution in Education.pptx
Google Gemini An AI Revolution in Education.pptxGoogle Gemini An AI Revolution in Education.pptx
Google Gemini An AI Revolution in Education.pptx
 
Micro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdf
Micro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdfMicro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdf
Micro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdf
 
Python Notes for mca i year students osmania university.docx
Python Notes for mca i year students osmania university.docxPython Notes for mca i year students osmania university.docx
Python Notes for mca i year students osmania university.docx
 
ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.
ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.
ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.
 
Fostering Friendships - Enhancing Social Bonds in the Classroom
Fostering Friendships - Enhancing Social Bonds  in the ClassroomFostering Friendships - Enhancing Social Bonds  in the Classroom
Fostering Friendships - Enhancing Social Bonds in the Classroom
 

Leadership Development Nashua, NH

  • 1. Nashua School District Leadership Development
  • 2. Leadership Development  Setting the Context  Supporting the Goals  Does Leadership Matter?  Are leaders crucial to support achievement?  How do we build leaders to support achievement?  How do we challenge our leaders?  Student Achievement  Where we are and where we need to be  Leadership Initiatives  Laying the Cornerstones for Leadership  Opportunities for Leadership Development
  • 4. Setting the Context: District Goals 1. To increase academic achievement for all students while recognizing the diverse needs of our students 2. To establish and communicate an accountability system 3. To align policies, procedures, and resources 4. To establish an assessment process 5. To provide a positive climate and a safe educational environment
  • 6. Setting the Context: Supporting the Goals  Does leadership matter?  Do beliefs make a difference?  Is our business growth and development?  Can all children learn?  If we seek student proficiency,  What is teacher proficiency?  What is administrator proficiency?  What is a successful school?
  • 8. The Challenging Question: Instructional Leadership  Principals are held accountable for student achievement; and yet,  ―The direct effect of principals on student achievement is near zero.‖  Ross and Gray, School Leadership and Student Achievement. 2002  Do you believe this?  And if you do, why are you a Principal [or, a District Administrator]?
  • 9. Instructional Leadership Model Community Instructional Climate Personal Beliefs and Principal Leadership Student Outcomes Experiences Institutional Instructional Organization Context
  • 10. Instructional Leadership Model  Instructional Climate  School mission  Student opportunity to learn  Teacher expectations for student learning  Instructional Organization  Opportunities for teaching and learning  Teaming students and teachers for instructional delivery and curricular monitoring
  • 11. Leadership  Advice for Urban School Leaders  Do what you say you’re going to do.  Know the work to lead the work.  Do not be afraid of accountability.  Tom Payzant, former Superintendent, Boston
  • 12. Leadership Development STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT: WHERE WE ARE AND WHERE WE NEED TO BE
  • 14. Nashua Attendance 2007-08 Attendance By School 100 PERCENTAGE OF DAYS IN ATTENDANCE 95 90 85 96 97 96 96 96 95 96 94 95 95 95 95 95 94 94 92 93 80 87 75 70 ALT AM BH BI BR CH CR EMS FG FMS LG MD MP NHN NHS NS PMS SH SCHOOL
  • 15. Nashua Attendance 2007-08 % Students with >30 Absences 40% 37% 35% ALT: 33 students 30% 25% % Students 20% North: 246 students South: 293 students 15% 13% 13% Ledge St: 32 students 10% 6% 5% 5% 4% 3% 3% 5% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 0% ALT AM BH BI BR CH CR EMS FG FMS LG MD MP NHN NHS NS PMS SH School
  • 16. Leadership Questions  Where we are and where we need to be  Student Attendance  Is it acceptable  That 293 students at South miss more than 30 days of school a year?  That 246 students at North miss more than 30 days of school a year?  That 32 elementary students at Ledge St. miss more than 30 days of school a year?
  • 18. High School Climate High School Students Involved in Misconduct 450 448 400 402 350 385 300 No. Students 250 NHN 249 NHS 200 150 100 50 0 2006-07 2007-08
  • 19. High School Climate Students Involved in Fighting and Inappropriate Contact 160 159 140 135 120 121 114 No. Students 100 NHN 80 NHS 60 40 20 0 2006-07 2007-08
  • 20. High School Climate Incidents of High School Fighting and Inappropriate Contact 280 240 254 226 200 188 No. Incidents 160 167 NHN NHS 120 80 40 0 2006-07 2007-08
  • 21. High School Climate HIGH SCHOOL DISCIPLINE HISTORY Number of Suspensions 1200 1000 1026 916 800 848 760 600 675 603 538 568 567 400 442 200 0 NHN NHS 03 04 05 06 07
  • 22. Leadership Questions  Where we are and where we need to be  High School Climate  Is it acceptable  That 18% of our students were involved in misconduct incidents last year?  That 7% of our students were involved in fighting incidents last year?  That 1500 suspensions occurred at the high schools last year?
  • 24. NECAP Math 2007 Elementary Proficiency and Poverty 100% 90% 84% 81% 81% 80% 78% 74% 70% 69% 70% 63% 58% 60% 60% 52% 50% 42% 40% Proficient 30% SES 20% 10% 0%
  • 25. NECAP Reading 2007 Elementary Proficiency and Poverty 100% 90% 87% 82% 79% 78% 79% 78% 80% 71% 71% 70% 68% 59% 57% 60% 50% 47% 40% Proficient 30% SES 20% 10% 0%
  • 26. NECAP Writing 2007 Elementary Proficiency and Poverty 100% 90% 80% 70% 68% 63% 60% 58% 53% 54% 52% 51% 51% 50% 48% 39% 40% 33% 33% Proficient 30% SES 20% 10% 0%
  • 27. NECAP Math 2007 Elementary Not Proficient 60% 57% 50% 47% 41% 39% 40% 36% 29% 30% 30% 25% 21% 20% 18% 18% 15% 10% 0%
  • 28. NECAP Reading 2007 Elementary Not Proficient 60% 52% 50% 42% 40% 40% 31% 30% 28% 28% 20% 21% 20% 21% 20% 17% 12% 10% 0%
  • 29. NECAP Writing 2007 Elementary Not Proficient 70% 66% 66% 60% 60% 51% 50% 48% 46% 48% 47% 45% 41% 40% 36% 31% 30% 20% 10% 0%
  • 30. Nashua District Test Results District NECAP 2005 Math Proficiency by Grade 80 70 60 % Students 50 Proficient 40 Not Proficient 30 20 10 0 3 4 5 6 7 8 Grade
  • 31. Nashua District Test Results District NECAP 2006 Math Proficiency by Grade 80 70 60 % Students 50 Proficient 40 Not Proficient 30 20 10 0 3 4 5 6 7 8 Grade
  • 32. Nashua District Test Results District NECAP 2007 Math Proficiency by Grade 80 70 60 % Students 50 Proficient 40 Not Proficient 30 20 10 0 3 4 5 6 7 8 11 Grade
  • 33. Leadership Questions  Where we are and where we need to be  NECAP Math Testing  Is it acceptable  That 3 out of 10 students are not proficient in math in Grade 5?  That 4 out of 10 students are not proficient in math in Grade 8?  That 7 out of 10 students are not proficient in math in Grade 11?
  • 34. Nashua District Test Results District NECAP 2007 Math Students in Poverty by Grade 100 80 % Students 60 Proficient Not Proficient 40 20 0 3 4 5 6 7 8 11 Grade
  • 35. Nashua District Test Results District NECAP 2007 Math Advanced Students by Grade 100 80 % Students 60 Advanced Others 40 20 0 3 4 5 6 7 8 11 Grade
  • 36. Nashua District Test Results District NECAP 2005 Reading Proficiency by Grade 70 60 50 % Students 40 Proficient 30 Not Proficient 20 10 0 3 4 5 6 7 8 Grade
  • 37. Nashua District Test Results District NECAP 2006 Reading Proficiency by Grade 70 60 50 % Students 40 Proficient 30 Not Proficient 20 10 0 3 4 5 6 7 8 Grade
  • 38. Nashua District Test Results District NECAP 2007 Reading Proficiency by Grade 80 70 60 % Students 50 Proficient 40 Not Proficient 30 20 10 0 3 4 5 6 7 8 11 Grade
  • 39. Leadership Questions  Where we are and where we need to be  NECAP Reading Testing  Is it acceptable  That 3 out of 10 students are not proficient in reading in Grade 5?  That 4 out of 10 students are not proficient in reading in Grade 8?  That 5 out of 10 students are not proficient in reading in Grade 11?
  • 40. Nashua District Test Results District NECAP 2007 Reading Students in Poverty by Grade 70 60 50 % Students 40 Proficient 30 Not Proficient 20 10 0 3 4 5 6 7 8 11 Grade
  • 41. Nashua District Test Results District NECAP 2007 Reading Advanced Students by Grade 100 80 % Students 60 Advanced Others 40 20 0 3 4 5 6 7 8 11 Grade
  • 43. High School Final Exams Math Department Nashua North HS Final Exams Semester Two 2007-08 240 200 160 Student Count A B 120 C 211 212 D F 80 157 136 119 40 0 A B C D F GRADE
  • 44. High School Final Exams Math Department Nashua South HS Final Exams Semester Two 2007-08 350 300 250 Student Count A 200 B C 150 320 D F 100 200 193 191 50 81 0 A B C D F GRADE
  • 45. Leadership Questions  Where we are and where we need to be  High School Math Final Exams:  Is it acceptable that 19% of our math students at North failed their final exam?  Is it acceptable that 35% received a D or F?  Is it acceptable that 33% of our math students at South failed their final exam?  Is it acceptable that 52% received a D or F?
  • 46. School Climate and Leadership Development STAFF RESPONSES TO MY ASPIRATIONS SURVEY
  • 47. My Voice Staff Survey: Leadership & Responsibility “I see myself as a leader.”
  • 48. My Voice Staff Survey: Leadership & Responsibility “My colleagues see me as a leader.”
  • 49. My Voice Staff Survey: Leadership & Responsibility “I am involved in school-wide decisions.”
  • 50. My Voice Staff Survey: Leadership & Responsibility “I know the goals my school is working on this year.”
  • 51. Leadership Questions  Where we are and where we need to be  Staff responses to Aspirations Survey:  Is it acceptable that 25% of our staff do not view themselves as leaders in our elementary schools?  Is it acceptable that 50% do not believe their colleagues view them as leaders?  Is it acceptable that 60% of our staff do not feel they are involved in school decisions?  Is it acceptable that between 40 and 50% of our staff do not know their school goals?
  • 53. Dr. Ron Krause – July 2008 A PRACTICAL APPROACH TO EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP
  • 54. Conceptual Framework  If you are involved in building and managing an organization……it is of critical importance to create tangible mechanisms aligned to preserve the core and stimulate progress.  Built To Last
  • 55.
  • 56. VALUES – What’s Important  What are your values?  Discover the values of those whom you wish to lead  Discover the organization’s values  Discover your mutual values  Make all decisions based on values  The strength of the organization is the strength of shared values  Drive home the organization’s values every time you speak
  • 57. What do Leaders Talk About?  They talk about what’s important around here  They talk about where are we headed  They talk about risk  They talk about what motivates people
  • 58. Leadership and Change Attitude: Ability is what you are capable of doing; motivation determines what you do; ATTITUDE determines how well you do it. Sensitivity: ―The art of progress is to preserve order amid change‖ Whitehead Style: ―The true measure of a person is how he/she treats someone who can do him/her absolutely no good‖ Samuel Johnson Salesmanship: ―Enthusiasm is the very propeller of progress‖ B.C. Forbes
  • 59. Leadership & Change  Motivation: ―Management by objective works, if you know the objectives‖ Peter Drucker  Communication: ―Understanding is a two-way street‖ Eleanor Roosevelt  Support: ―If anything goes bad, I did it. If anything goes semi-good, then we did it. If anything goes real good, then you did it. That’s all it takes to get people to win football games for you.‖ Bear Bryant
  • 60. Leadership & Change  Drive: ― Leadership: The art of getting someone else to do something you want done because he wants to do it.‖ Dwight Eisenhower  Integrity: ― A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes.‖ Mark Twain  Responsibility: ―The quality of a leader is reflected in the standards they set for themselves.‖ Abraham Lincoln
  • 61. OUTCOMES  Alignment – sense of purpose/energy  Empowerment – responsibility  Respect – shared participation  Interdependence - connected system  Innovation – divergent ideas  Commitment – buy-in
  • 62. Dr. Daniel Goleman LEADERSHIP THAT GETS RESULTS
  • 63. Leadership That Gets Results  Six Drivers of Climate  Flexibility  How free employees feel to innovate unencumbered by red tape  Responsibility  The sense of responsibility that employees have to the organization  Standards  The level of standards that people set
  • 64. Leadership That Gets Results  Rewards  The sense of accuracy about performance feedback and aptness of rewards  Clarity  The clarity people have about mission and values  Commitment  The level of commitment to a common purpose
  • 65. Leadership That Gets Results  Six Leadership Styles*  Coercive  Authoritative  Affiliative  Democratic  Pacesetting  Coaching * From Hay/McBer executive research
  • 66. Leadership That Gets Results  Coercive leaders  Demand immediate compliance  Authoritative leaders  Mobilize people toward a vision  Affiliative leaders  Create emotional bonds and harmony
  • 67. Leadership That Gets Results  Democratic leaders  Build consensus through participaton  Pacesetting leaders  Expect excellence and self-direction  Coaching leaders  Develop people for the future
  • 68. Leadership That Gets Results Coercive Authoritative Affiliative Democratic Pacesetting Coaching Flexibility -.28 .32 .27 .28 -.07 .17 Responsibility -.37 .21 .16 .23 .04 .08 Standards .02 .38 .31 .22 -.27 .39 Rewards -.18 .54 .48 .42 -.29 .43 Clarity -.11 .44 .37 .35 -.28 .38 Commitment -.13 .35 .34 .26 -.20 .27 Overall Impact -.26 .54 .46 .43 -.25 .42
  • 69. Leadership That Gets Results Coercive Authoritative Affiliative Democratic Pacesetting Coaching The leader’s Demands Mobilizes people Creates Forges Set high Develops modus immediate toward a vision harmony and consensus standards for people for the operandi compliance builds through performance future emotional participation bonds The style in a ―Do what I ―Come with me.‖ ―People come ―What do you ―Do as I do, ―Try this.‖ phrase tell you.‖ first.‖ think?‖ now.‖ Underlying Drive to Self-confidence, Empathy, Collaboration, Conscientiousn Developing emotional achieve, empathy, change building team ess, drive to others, intelligence initiative, catalyst relationships, leadership, achieve, empathy, self- competencies self-control communication communication initiative awareness When the style In a crisis, to When changes To heal rifts in To build buy-in To get quick To help an works best kick start a require a new a team or to or consensus, results from a employee turnaround, vision, or when a motivate or to get input highly improve or with clear direction is people during from valuable motivated and performance problem needed stressful employees competent to develop employees circumstances team long-term strengths Overall impact Negative Most strongly Positive Positive Negative Positive on climate positive
  • 70. James Mealey, Chief Operating Officer, Nashua School District THE CHANGE PROCESS
  • 71. The Ten Commandments of Implementing Change 1. Analyze the organization and its need for change 2. Create a common direction 3. Separate from the past 4. Create a sense of urgency 5. Support strong leadership roles 6. Line up political sponsorship 7. Craft an implementation plan 8. Develop enabling structures 9. Communicate, involve people, and be honest 10. Reinforce and institutionalize change
  • 72. Priorities for Leadership and Organizational Development in Nashua LAYING THE CORNERSTONES
  • 73. Laying the Cornerstones  Cornerstones are foundations of organizational direction  To create and sustain organizational behavior to build leadership through the district  To focus the energy and direction of the internal organization of the Nashua School District  To Identify target areas of human resources development to maximize student achievement  To support the Board of Education goals for the Nashua School District
  • 74. Organizational and Leadership Cornerstones for the Nashua School District  Building Leadership  Shaping Belief  Creating Achievement  Celebrating Success
  • 75. Laying the Cornerstones  How do we Build Leadership?  Throughout the district  In every student, every teacher, every administrator, every paraprofessional, every food service employee, every custodian, every secretary, every bus driver,  For shared decisions  For innovative ideas  For student success and student achievement
  • 76. Laying the Cornerstones  How do we Shape Belief?  In every student, every teacher, every administrator, every paraprofessional, every food service employee, every custodian, every secretary, every bus driver, that  All students can succeed  Education is an inalienable right  Our business is the growth and development of children  Learning takes place every day for everyone
  • 77. Laying the Cornerstones  How do we Create Achievement?  Do we believe that our business in education is the growth and development of children?  Can we commit ourselves to breaking the myth that some children are incapable of learning at high levels?  Are we creating opportunities for students to demonstrate that they can learn at high levels—in every class, every day?
  • 78. Laying the Cornerstones  How do we Celebrate Success?  Are we building a culture of community?  Are we recognizing the achievements of students and staff?  Do we recognize achievement when we see it?  Is the school a family?
  • 79. The Four Cornerstones  What will building the Cornerstones lead to?  Success and achievement for all students, through 1. Leadership development 2. Accountability for schools 3. Human resources professional development focused on student learning 4. Individual student monitoring reports
  • 80. 1. Leadership Development  Literacy training for Principals and school leaders  360 leadership institute  Professional panel presentations by staff at Board of Education meetings  The Efficacy Institute  Shaping proficiency throughout the organization
  • 81. 2. Accountability for Schools  Develop school report cards  Establish criteria [examples]  Attendance  State test scores [AYP]  Climate  My Voice surveys, School approval standards, Discipline, Staff evaluation  Student monitoring and improvement  Set school targets  Use targets for evaluations
  • 82. 3. Human Resources Professional Development  All kids can learn  TERC data teams: grade-level and vertical  CRM literacy training  Small learning communities  Efficacy Institute for title schools  Paraprofessional mentoring  Principal walkthroughs and feedback  Understanding of special education identification
  • 83. 4. Individual Student Monitoring  Set criteria for individual monitoring report  Develop monitoring report  Each student has monitoring report in place by end of 2008-09  Monitoring report data is used in Accountability for Schools
  • 84.
  • 85. Organizational Cornerstones of the Nashua School District Supporting District Goals
  • 86. Leadership Development Student Achievement Teacher Leadership Principal Leadership District Leadership