Declaration of Performances are mandatory to supply per 1-7-2013. How to organise the logistics of the declarations to a product in the building chain?

1. DoP’s in the building chain
Chris Hamans
Okt. 2012

4. Supplying a DoP is a logisitic problem

5. Supplying a DoP is a logisitc problem

6. from factory

7. per packaging unit
from factory
Unpacked into
many single units

8. xyz
123
Impossible to
CE-mark the
product

9. xyz
123
Impossible to
CE-mark the
product

10. ?
?

11. Delivery note
Bordereau de livraison
Lieferschein
Vrachtbrief
Incl.

12. CPR 305/2011
+ DoP
Declaration of Performance

13. DoP: ult. per 1-7-2013

15. Delivery note
Bordereau de livraison
Lieferschein
+
Vrachtbrief
+ Incl.

16. Delivery note
Bordereau de livraison
Lieferschein
+
the paper flow
Vrachtbrief
+ Incl.

17. ?
??
? ? ?
+
DoP
xxxxx
abbc 123 pqr

18. ?
??
? ? ?
+
DoP
xxxxx
abbc 123 pqr
the paper flow

19. xyz
123
DoP no. ......

20. Delivery note
Bordereau de livraison
Lieferschein
Vrachtbrief
DoP no. ......
Incl.

21. A paper based solution will not work

22. A paper based solution will not work
An electronic solution:
the information amount to a product only can be managed via
electronic data exchange.

23. DoP no. ......
A server filled with DoP

24. A paper based solution will not work
An electronic solution:
the information amount to a product only can be managed via
electronic data exchange.
Question: a data server per manufacturer?

25. A paper based solution will not work
An electronic solution:
the information amount to a product only can be managed via
electronic data exchange.
Question: a data server per building merchant?

26. a DoP-server with a DoP-server with
each A server filled with DoP each
builders merchant ? product manufacturer ?

27. A paper based solution will not work
An electronic solution:
the information amount to a product only can be managed via
electronic data exchange.
Question: a central European dataserver?

28. From a manufacturer’s point of view:

29. direct delivery to end-user
From a manufacturer’s point of view:
Paper based DoP impossible to handle
in printing, packaging and distributing
Electronic communication via
manufacturer’s server or assigned server;
Instructions or URL on delivery note and/or
CE-marking on the product

30. DoP no. ......
A server filled with DoP
The manufacturer

31. delivery via builders merchants .................
..................... to end-user
From a manufacturer’s point of view:
If all builders merchants will have their own server
and communication system for distributing the DoP’s
Different systems and server templates
will be impossible to handle

32. A server filled with DoP
DoP no. ......
1
Manufacturer
n
2 3

33. From a builders merchant’s point of view:

34. From a builders merchant’s point of view:
If all manufacturers supply their DoP’s
or specify the source of DoP’s.
An enormous administrative burden for
merchants chanelling DoP’s or DoP-source

35. A server filled with DoP
Manufacturer 1
Manufacturer 3
Manufacturer 2

36. DoP no. ......
DoP no. ......
DoP no. ......
A server filled with DoP
Manufacturer 1
Manufacturer 3
Manufacturer 2

37. DoP no. ......
A server filled with DoP
? A Common European DoP Access Point
?

38. A Common European DoP Access Point
– What is the point and how could it work

39. Motivation
Why a common DoP-Access Point?
Why an industry controlled DoP-Access Point?
• Centralised-channelled data exchange
• Efficiency
• Compliance
• Greater strength
• Traceability
• Greater potential for future tasks
• Supports a Common Market
39

40. PRINCIPLE

41. or
DoP – Access Code
Common access point

42. or
DoP – Access Code
Association Manufacturer
server server
Common access point

43. or
DoP – Access Code
Association Manufacturer
server server
Common access point
Central server

44. Approach A: Re-Direction
Product - ID Product - ID
Common access point
responsibility responsibility responsibility

45. Approach A: Re-Direction
Product - ID Product - ID
Common access point
responsibility responsibility responsibility
 only requires an identifiable product-id each participant has to run his own system
 low cost for the consortium each system has to comply with the criteria (to be) set by
 almost no maintenance cost the Commission
each operator has to store data for > 10 a
each operator has to take care of the language issue
higher risk of errors
over all higher costs

46. Approach B: Synchronised data
Product - ID Product - ID
Common access point
Database Database
+ Interface + Interface
Server
46

47. Approach B: Synchronised data
Product - ID Product - ID
 only requires an identifiable product-id higher costs for consortium
 low cost for the user (manufacturers) Common access point
 system compliance with Commission criteria to be
demonstrated only once for all
 language version included
 storage > 10 a provided
 manufacturer can cut the link to the platform without
loosing data
 over all lower costs
Database
 lower risk of errors Database
+ Interface + Interface
Server
47

48. Approach C: Outsourced data
Product - ID
Common access point
Server
Web interface
48

49. Approach D: all-in-one Product - ID
Product - ID Product - ID
Product - ID Product - ID
Common access point
Database Database
+ Interface Server
+ Interface
Server
Web interface

50. The European Common Access Point
• Is an initiative of a group of leading European producers of
construction products.
• A confederation is established (in establishment)
– Seat: Maastricht , the Netherlands
– All (public registered) European manufacturers of construction
products can apply as member.
– DoP data remain full responsability of the producer
• Timeline – Goal setting:
– per February 2013 uploading DoP possible
– per 1-7-2013 DoP (free) downloadable

51. we invite construction product manufacturers
- small, medium, big –
joining the project

52. Interested? More info?
contact:
Project management of the European Common Access Point
Ir. Chris Hamans
esc@hamans.com – tel: +31 648 60 63 63