32. The inside game is most
effective when the issues:
are narrow and technical;
33. The inside game is most
effective when the issues:
are narrow and technical;
do not command much media
or public attention;
34. The inside game is most
effective when the issues:
are narrow and technical;
do not command much media
or public attention;
do not stir up counteractivity by
other interest groups.
47. Tools of the Outside Game
• Mobilizing Membership
48. Tools of the Outside Game
• Mobilizing Membership
• Organizing the District
49. Tools of the Outside Game
• Mobilizing Membership
• Organizing the District
• Shaping Opinion
50. Tools of the Outside Game
• Mobilizing Membership
• Organizing the District
• Shaping Opinion
– Publication of Research results
51. Tools of the Outside Game
• Mobilizing Membership
• Organizing the District
• Shaping Opinion
– Publication of Research results
– Advertising
52. Tools of the Outside Game
• Mobilizing Membership
• Organizing the District
• Shaping Opinion
– Publication of Research results
– Advertising
– Maintaining working relationships with
the media
53. Tools of the Outside Game
• Mobilizing Membership
• Organizing the District
• Shaping Opinion
– Publication of Research results
– Advertising
– Maintaining working relationships with
the media
– Political Action Committees
54. Tools of the Outside Game
• Mobilizing Membership
• Organizing the District
• Shaping Opinion
– Publication of Research results
– Advertising
– Maintaining working relationships with
the media
– Political Action Committees
– Blogging and Web 2.0 activism
67. Access inequality
inequalities of representation
and resources are accentuated
by the ability of some groups to
form relatively stable alliances
with government institutions and
decision-makers
71. Iron Triangles
A three-way arrangement in
which an alliance is formed
between a private interest
group, a bureaucratic agency,
and a Congressional committee
or subcommittee.