The day is here when home area networks (HANs) contribute to energy efficiency for utilities and home users; the way forward will be driven by automated demand response (ADR), automated demand side management (DSM), dynamic pricing, and electric vehicle (EV) charging among other key factors.
The Work Ahead in Intelligent Automation: Coping with Complexity in a Post-Pa...
Home Area Networks: A Preferred Choice for Energy Efficiency
1. • Cognizant 20-20 Insights
Home Area Networks: A Preferred
Choice for Energy Efficiency
Rising energy prices, increasingly sophisticated conservation options
and gains in customer confidence are driving the adoption of home
energy management technologies and electric vehicle charging.
Executive Summary has proposed strict greenhouse emissions rules
for all new power stations, effectively barring the
According to reports, global investment in smart
building of any new coal-fired plants.3 Nuclear
home management will surpass $4 billion in 2016,
power generation has proliferation and environ-
fueled by government stimulus, faster wireless
mental risks. The aftermath of the 2011 tsunami
networks and cloud platforms.1 Utility customers
made this abundantly clear. With the given rise in
now no longer just consume energy but are
political pressure, utilities worldwide would look
willing to participate in energy conservation and
to their own customers to help tackle the ever-
contribute through energy generation. For a
increasing demand for energy.
utility, every kWh saved is a kWh earned.
The current scenario has enabled energy service Energy Demand and Utilities’
providers and retailers to offer cloud-based Response
smart services and solutions for home energy According to the Electric Power Research
management. Institute, electricity consumption in residen-
tial, commercial and industrial establishments
This paper seeks to address the challenges in the U.S. is set to increase at a rate of 1.07%
that the energy industry faces in leveraging annually, with consumption increasing by 26%
investments in advanced meter infrastructure. till 2030. Whereas the Annual Energy Outlook
It proposes engaging residential customers in 2012 (AEO2012) Reference Case forecasts a
achieving end-user energy efficiency. realistic potential reduction of 22%, to 0.83% in
this growth rate, by the creation of a favorable
The Geopolitical Imperative environment through government sponsorship
The “Green Button Initiative,”2 an industry as well as market-driven trends toward energy
response to a White House call to provide utility efficiency.4
customers with energy usage data to help them
minimize wastage and shrink bills, has prompted While utilities search for newer and cleaner ways
large investments in home area network (HAN) of energy generation, however, their programs
development. Adding to the urgency is the fact and policies for energy demand reduction lag
that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency behind. This can be partly attributed to utilities’
cognizant 20-20 insights | september 2012
2. fears about their bottom line, which in turn is This leads to some obvious questions:
due to their lack of understanding of appropri-
ate technologies to achieve demand reduction. • How profitable is pursuing residential energy
efficiency through ADR?
Successful demand reduction can be realized with
automated demand side management (DSM), • How much are customers willing to invest in
which uses analytical frameworks to analyze HAN HAN-enabled smart appliances?
device data, end-user load profile characteriza-
tion and environmental impact, and thereafter
• How should baselines be estimated for resi-
dential customers without jeopardizing their
integrate this data into utility resource planning. comfort or safety?
The U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s • How should rewards be determined for
report on national demand response potential consumers without compromising grid
suggests that the residential class of customers, operators’ profitability?
which is awash in energy choices and replete with
high tech options, provides the most “untapped
• How should energy reduction coefficients for
demand reduction management be calculated?
potential for demand response.” With 70% antici-
pated participation, demand response programs Impediments to end-user demand control can
represent roughly 45% of the potential impact be resolved through a systematic and stream-
on end-user energy efficiency.5 The caveat here is lined approach towards ADR programs. It would
the lack of a viable business plan for generating comprise steps such as the following:
revenue and profit from smart appliances.
• Segregate consumers into heterogeneous
groups based on factors such as weather
Business Case Modeling for
conditions, appliance classes, etc. and
HAN Energy Management
designate a baseline load shape for each group.
Automated Demand Response
Automated demand response (ADR) programs
• Analyze demand patterns combining historic
and real-time demand data.
for HAN-enabled appliances present a utility
with viable opportunities for flattening peak • Design and deploy an accurate prediction
load demand to a manageable scale through model for dispatchable and non-dispatchable
peak shaving. Peak shaving could be achieved ADR programs.
by programming end-user devices to reflect daily
• Quantify statistically the impact of ADR
demand patterns. through an appropriate measurement and veri-
Results of ADR Implementation from a Listed Utility
Electric Load Profile of Auto DR Participants, August 30, 2007
45
Whole Building Power (MW)
40
Auto DR
35 Saves Capacity
30
25
Auto DR Saves Energy — 3/10/07 Baseline
20
— 8/30/07 Baseline
12 AM 12 PM 11PM
Source: http://www.pge.com/mybusiness/energysavingsrebates/demandresponse/adrp/
Figure 1
cognizant 20-20 insights 2
3. fication methodology. Use regression methods • Accruing cost overhead of newer devices and
for baseline adjustment. absence of accepted standards for interoper-
ability.
• Evaluate and automate the process of integrat-
ing customers’ distributed energy generation How can these problems be addressed?
and renewable capability. • Leverage advanced communication such as
• Create awareness and educate customers Wi-Fi, 4G-LTE, etc. to stream real-time usage
about the benefits and ease of modern demand data from smart meters.
reduction methods. • Educate consumers by deploying IHDs and
• Reward customers’ demand reduction steps. energy dashboards, and eradicate miscon-
ceptions about price neutrality and the
Dynamic Pricing and Curated Consumption extent of usage curtailment by using statisti-
Consumers find it easier to comprehend price cally accurate yet easy-to-decipher reports,
information rather than kilowatts/hour. Thus messages and alerts.
price management systems must translate peak
• Exhibit sensitivity towards particular customer
electric system conditions, providing objective segments such as low-income groups, the
information on scarcity of electricity to customers, elderly, the infirm, children and small businesses
so as to engage them in energy management. to help allay concerns about dynamic pricing
being unfair. Create forward contracts and
Is Dynamic Pricing the One-stop Shop for DSM?
baseline rebates and encourage risk-free trials.
Dynamic pricing deployment involves challenges
such as the following: • Provide bill protection by ensuring that bills are
not higher than otherwise applicable tariffs but
• Availability
of usage data that is sufficient- rather are reduced.
ly granular and frequent for flexible rate
deployment. Distributed Generation and Impact
from Electric Vehicle Charging
• Consumer sentiment about the complex
With the advent of deregulation, distributed
dynamic pricing being predatory and unfair
energy generation can no longer be overlooked
and designed to benefit only high-end homes.
in distribution systems. Bloomberg’s energy
Dynamic Pricing Philosophy
Would you mind a dynamic tariff?
No risk, no reward
Potential
Reward Less Risk, More Risk,
(Discount from Lower Reward Higher Reward
Flat Rate)
RTP
Increasing Reward
PTR VPP
CPP
Super Peak TOU
TOU
Seasonal Rate
Inclining Block Rate
Flat Rate
Risk
Increasing Risk (Variance in Price)
Source: http://www.menloenergy.com/?p=349
Figure 2
TOU = Time of Use
CPP = Critcal Peak Pricing cognizant 20-20 insights 3
VPP = Variable Peak Pricing
PTR = Peak Time Rebate
RTP = Real Time Pricing
4. finance report on the U.S. mentions a massive off-peak hours could cause shifts in demand
57% increase in its renewable energy outlay, to peaks and may lead to vulnerability in the
$51 billion.6 Falling technology costs and strength- power distribution system.
ening policy support in favor of renewable energy
create a favorable environment for benefitting
• High variability and complex signaling make
renewable energy integration difficult.
from the advantages of distribution generation.
• Power quality and harmonic distortion can
A major advantage of the advent of smart throw a systematic grid off balance.
grids and smart appliances is their ability to
sense, collect and analyze disaggregated data. Dealing with the Impact of EV Charging
Therefore dynamic peak load shaving can be Utilities can subsidize electric charging equipment,
achieved by intelligently shifting residential users thereby reserving the rights to provision them as
to their localized power backup facilities during HAN devices — thus making remote monitoring
peak demand. and management possible.
Growth of Electric Vehicles Utilities should provision separate meters for EV
The stability of energy grids worldwide has charging so that the advanced metering infra-
been affected by plug-in electric vehicles. U.S. structure (AMI) data from these meters can be
government agencies predict that more than collected and analyzed for accurate identifica-
one million electric vehicles will be in service by tion and customer profile segregation. This will
2015. The U.S. Department of Energy recently help in prediction of EV penetration and charging
announced an $8.5 million grant to support public behavior.
planning of EV infrastructure through joint public
Finally, focused solutions such as EV charging
and private ventures.7
impact visualization, ADR and direct load control
A settlement between the California Public can be leveraged through HAN and wide area
Utilities Commission (CPUC) and NRG Energy Inc. network applications.
will result in the establishment of roughly 200
charging stations and over 10,000 charging units
Conclusion
in 1,000 locations across California.8 Growing energy prices and consumers’ desire
for energy monitoring and control will attract
To mitigate the risk from uncontrolled EV investments into HAN technology and in-home
charging, utilities should focus on applications displays. Commoditization of LAN/WAN tech-
that help integrate the charging infrastructure nologies coupled with maturity and standardiza-
into their resource planning. tion of protocols will foster growth and ease of
deployment in HAN-based energy management
Problematic Scenarios for EV and Renewable systems. Utilities and energy service providers
Energy Integration should target this growth opportunistically and
• EV early adopters with even a level 2 charger should align their offerings to capitalize on the
could exceed the emergency loading charac- emerging HAN marketplace. Simply put, execution
teristics in most transformers today in a matter of ADR, DSM and dynamic pricing combined with
of minutes. the versatility and flexibility of HAN technology
• Disparate EV charging could be uncontrollable will not only increase trust among customers but
and undetectable. Simultaneous charging at also engage them in energy-saving endeavors.
cognizant 20-20 insights 4