Business Case: IBM DB2 versus Oracle Database - Conor O'Mahony

Smackdown: IBM DB2 versus Oracle Database Conor O’Mahony, IBM [email_address] Session 1428

Important Disclaimer ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Agenda ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Background: Server Costs ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

DB2---Strong Tradition of Performance Leadership! Source: Days of leadership for TPC performance results (www.tpc.org) between 01 Jan 2003 and 28 July 2009.

DB2 Performs Better on Identical Systems ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Source: TPC-C results available on www.tpc.org.

Caution: Prices in Benchmarks ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Background: Solitaire Report ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

DB2 has Better Performance in Production Systems Higher is Better Source: Solitaire Whitepaper: DB2 Performance on IBM System p® and System x® Transactions per Second on IBM System p

Conclusions: Server Costs ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Background: Software Costs ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Impact of Better Performance on Software Costs ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Oracle Database 11g 22% = $104,500 Year 3 Support $788,500 22% = $104,500 22% = $104,500 1 * 10 x 47,500 = $475,000 Total Costs Year 2 Support Year 1 Support Initial Software License IBM DB2 9.7 20% = $97,200 Year 3 Support $681,200 20% = $97,200 Included 120 x 10 x 405 = $486,800 Total Costs Year 2 Support Year 1 Support Initial Software License IBM DB2 9.7 20% = $77,760 Year 3 Support $544,320 20% = $77,760 Included 120 x 8 x 405 = $388,800 Total Costs Year 2 Support Year 1 Support Initial Software License

Impact of Better Performance on Software Costs ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Oracle Database 11g 22% = $78,375 Year 3 Support $591,375 22% = $78,375 22% = $78,375 .75 * 10 x 47,500 = $356,250 Total Costs Year 2 Support Year 1 Support Initial Software License IBM DB2 9.7 20% = $81,000 Year 3 Support $567,000 20% = $81,000 Included 100 x 10 x 405 = $405,000 Total Costs Year 2 Support Year 1 Support Initial Software License IBM DB2 9.7 20% = $64,800 Year 3 Support $453,600 20% = $64,800 Included 100 x 8 x 405 = $324,000 Total Costs Year 2 Support Year 1 Support Initial Software License

Background: Storage Costs ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

DB2 Leads Storage Efficiency DB2 9 Oracle Database Higher is Better “ Due to its global optimality of compression a table-wide dictionary approach can result in high compression factors… Furthermore, a global dictionary may use less disk space compared to a block level approach...” 1.5 Times Better 3.3 Times Better 2.0 Times Better 8.7 Times Better

DB2 Needs 43% Less Staff on System p IBM DB2 Oracle Database Microsoft SQL Server Not Available on System p Lower is Better Source: Solitaire Whitepaper: DB2 Performance on IBM System p® and System x®

DB2 Needs 22% Less Staff on System x IBM DB2 Oracle Database Microsoft SQL Server Source: Solitaire Whitepaper: DB2 Performance on IBM System p® and System x® Lower is Better

Industry Analysts Praise DB2… "The industry “rule of thumb” remains that 25% to 35% more DBA time is required for Oracle than for DB2 9 environments." — ITG "DB2 was heavily favored in this regard... with fewer and shorter outages for normal operational activities, the overall availability and reliability of the DBMS shows some clear differentiation." — Solitaire

Business Case Studies ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

DB2 Saves 37% for Retail ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],IBM DB2 9.7 Oracle Database 11g Source: ITG: Value Proposition for IBM DB2 9.7: Cost Savings Compared to Oracle 11g

DB2 Saves 34% for Telecoms ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Source: ITG: Value Proposition for IBM DB2 9.7: Cost Savings Compared to Oracle 11g IBM DB2 9.7 Oracle Database 11g

DB2 Saves 38% for Financial Services ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Source: ITG: Value Proposition for IBM DB2 9.7: Cost Savings Compared to Oracle 11g IBM DB2 9.7 Oracle Database 11g

DB2 Costs Less Across the Board Source: ITG: Value Proposition for IBM DB2 9.7: Cost Savings Compared to Oracle 11g

For More Information… ,[object Object],[object Object],Email: [email_address] Twitter: conor_omahony Blog: db2news.wordpress.com

Business Case: IBM DB2 versus Oracle Database - Conor O'Mahony

Recomendados

Recomendados

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente

La actualidad más candente (19)

Destacado

Destacado (19)

Similar a Business Case: IBM DB2 versus Oracle Database - Conor O'Mahony

Similar a Business Case: IBM DB2 versus Oracle Database - Conor O'Mahony (20)

Último

Último (20)

Business Case: IBM DB2 versus Oracle Database - Conor O'Mahony