Right of life, cristian carter

Cristian Carter http://cristcarter4.spaces.live.com

2. ABOUT RIGHT TO LIFE, ABORTION,
DEATH PENALTY AND EUTHANASIA

Of Cristian Carter
http://cristcarter4.spaces.live.com
www.scribd.com/cristcarter

“While mankind continue massacring to their fellows, the animals, suffering will reign,
because anyone who sows sorrow and death cannot harvest nor joy, nor peace, nor love
and happiness”
Pythagoras

LIFE is the gift from God, - from something which transcends and covers us – and it is
good to take care of it in all sense.

From this gift, intelligence is a part of the gift in an advanced and complex way
compared to other animals, and sometimes it is used for ridiculous purposes against
ourselves, nature and environment, and it is supposed that the other animals had less
development and neuronal complexity, so, therefore, they have less intelligence, which
is doubtful, because of cruelty, damages and destruction for unconscious and lack of
transcendental integral intelligence of human beings.

BOOKS, AND UNIVERSAL MENTALITY, ON www.scribd.com/cristcarter


The disasters we have made have been historical facts, known for everyone: wars;
atomic bombs; thousands of deaths on behalf of God or ideas of sick people; animals
killing and cruelty; and destruction of flora and fauna, to benefit financial interests of
some sick people (psychopathology because of lack of conscious of human superior
human values, like respect for life and sustainable development for the future
generations).

Harmony with nature, intelligence and spirituality is an invitation for develop a better
world in harmony with the entire Universe, because everything and everybody are
connected in behaviour. Every act has a consequence in the world (Newton), and is
based on thinking (quantum physical).... So, what we think about?

Life, in all sense, in all its facets, human and animal, deserves respect and protection.
It is not just the beautiful speech which hails from it; it is certain that through its
genuine respect and protection, the needed conditions for a healthy life are created, and
transcends beyond the possible arguments in favour of it.

The posture in favour of it, banning abortion, death penalty and euthanasia, is a deep
sight which leads to other state of universal development in terms of integral social
happiness. Without respect for life, any advance is just material and short-term.

IF WE SAY NO TO ABORTION, then protecting our lives, and, of course, with the
basis of creating the conditions for those children, in order they can grow up in a world
containing the minimal conditions which enable their integral growth and development,
such as food, affect, values, clothing, education, health, justice and freedom. It’s a fact
that while creating a social dynamic of respect and development in groups of harmony,
because the society itself becomes supportive, a conscious society in where each and
every one of its inhabitants are benefited of this consciousness of life and good.

The same can be applied to the CASE OF DEATH PENALTY, against a system in
which sanctions are proportional to crimes; and in which the ones who can’t or don’t
want to be reinstated in society could be on places in where the rest can’t be affected,
because also the State must look after safety and respect of human right, life and
psychological and physical integrity of the other inhabitants, who’d grow up in a safer
world in order to reach their happiness.



To proclaim about right to life is useless if neither we look after the ones who DON’T
WANT to respect it. In this instance, the state must be strong, of course, regarding to
limits in human rights, as procedural guarantees.

For instance, it’s absurd to collectively achieve high minimum wages and be killed
while going to work from home, v.gr. To the taxi driver, or the jeweller who’d been
robbed four times during the year. It’s also as unacceptable as living behind bars and
jail safety systems. The victims of those crimes also have human rights to look after.

The system also gives means for people who want and are willing to change and be
reinstated in society (training, job opportunities, psychological and psychiatric
therapies, etc.), because all of us can also fall into behaviour instability and we deserve
to be given another chance, to find the light again in a plural altruist society.

There are other known crimes as murders, which cause great clear sorrow to social mind
and victims; certainly, that murderer’s death causes a surprisingly wide shadow, in
which a more violent society causes more violence. Without affecting the other strong
effective means that society uses for defence, it must be based on superior arguments,
such as human’s life and dignity.

THE CASE OF EUTHANASIA, which comprehends the psychological pain of a sick
person suffering a disease, and, of course, battles with physical pains with all
thecomplex tools created for science, is a way to accept the failure of life, and it shows
that our society hasn’t gone forward in order to ensure the person’s happiness
beyond worldly material problems. The professionals must be focused on mental
behaviour branches and spiritual masters in order to teach people to enjoy life in a
happy positive way.

Here I say that the problems will be problems according our point of view of life; the
problems don’t exist without us, we are the problem according to our particular point of
view. “Let’s learn to be flexible and to charge the life happily, beyond factual
circumstances”.

Euthanasia is a sign of our life in a society overwhelmed in materialism, being love and



spiritual issues the most important things to reach the feeling of happiness we deserve,
which constitutes an upper right we must reach.

In my life, I’ve known hundreds of unhappy bitter frustrated people although they have
money and power. It’s good to learn about studies on happiness and its connection to
lovely interpersonal relations.

Life is, ethical and legally, the most appreciated item (that’s why it’s specially protected
in international treaties, including respect to physical and psychological integrity); so,
about THE GROUNDS FOR ACQUITTAL ON PENAL RESPONSIBILITY, –
except for self-defence – the state of need (I mean, to damage an asset in order to save
another one of more category; e.g.: I break a door to save a person), cannot exempt
from penal responsibility to someone who makes an attempt on other person’s life,
even to save his/her own life; precisely, because life is a legal item, ethical and,
naturally, the most transcendental, the most appreciated and the item with the higher
rank.

So, those interpretations which lead to exempt from someone who kills another one to
save his/her own life are old-fashioned and wrong, for instance, a person eats anyone
else in order not to die for starvation, or the one who kills a child in order to “calm
down the Gods” (if only God can justify death) . This is produced because it leads to the
absurdity of automatically make an attempt against right of life, which is a basic
immanent human right, and furthermore, it can be used on chaotic cases of political or
food crisis. Furthermore, following the same logic, the one who kills other one in order
to extract his/her vital organs in order to save his/her own life, must also be justifiable.
The latter case mathematically shows that while the same logic exposed in the
previously seen examples exists, an unforgivable absurdity also exists.

The right of life therefore requires from everybody, the respect for dignity of each one
of the living beings, and their right to integral and freely develop themselves on the
basis of dignity and love, which leads to a happy world, which can be reached. It is easy
if we want it, if we have thoughts and behaviour which leads to respect.
Transcendentally, we are what we want to be. The penal sanctions and huge fines that
countries give to abuse against animals and protection of flora and fauna are right in this
sense.



Every decision and thought we have has an effect on our lives and environment, so we
are right if we change in this sense, based on a world of relativism, those essential
values, human rights, that if they outweigh in our conscious and minds, foretell a sure
way of happiness and sustainable development for the whole humanity.

In the last decades, the world has substantially changed, technology, values and
conscious (the natural rights, which are deduced by goodness and love) have advanced
and improved, and now, we have reached a point in where if we don’t concrete these
superior values, and the darkness, negativism, evilness, corruption, envy, extreme
competitiveness, lack of solidarity, lack of love, and other negative emotions and
thoughts – which show our low mental, cultural and spiritual level – continue in the
political speeches and in our lives, we are ad portas of our failure as human, in where
depression, stress and sadness will be taking over.

Otherwise, if we take our conscious, worldwide, of this gifts of God, or something
superior, or nature, or the Universe – or as you want to understand them, looking at the
content of this message – we will take over from a mediocre, unhappy, ill and unfair
society, to a BETTER, HAPPIER one, in where, as a whole humanity, from the same
race and nature (we all hail from Africa and have adapted to the means; in science, the
concept of “race” doesn’t exist), beyond material differences, colours, sexual options or
religious believes, can live in peace, responsible freedom (respect to oneself and the
others) and love; which are the basis of the honest happiness, transcendental and raised
from our internal ego, and is then expressed through each one of us, through our
behaviour, in everyone’s happiness, based on the respect of universal superior values, or
human rights.


Right of life, cristian carter

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

Viewers also liked (7)

More from CRIST CARTER

More from CRIST CARTER (12)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Right of life, cristian carter