1. An Evolving
Australian Gold
Producer
JUNE 2011
TSX:CRK OTCQX:CROCF
FRANKFURT:XGC
2. Disclaimer
Forward Looking Statements TSX:CRK
This presentation contains forward-looking statements under Canadian securities legislation. Forward-looking statements include, but are not
limited to, statements with respect to the development potential and timetable of the projects; the Company’s ability to raise additional funds as
necessary; the future price of gold; the estimation of mineral resources; conclusions of economic evaluation (including scoping studies); the
realization of mineral resource estimates; the timing and amount of estimated future production, development and exploration; costs of future
activities; capital and operating expenditures; success of exploration activities; mining or processing issues; currency exchange rates; government
regulation of mining operations; and environmental risks. Generally, forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking
terminology such as “plans”, “expects” or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates”
or “does not anticipate”, or “believes”, or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”,
“would”, “might” or “will be taken”, “occur” or “be achieved”. Forward-looking statements are based on the opinions and estimates of management
as of the date such statements are made. Estimates regarding the anticipated timing, amount and cost of mining at the projects are based on
assumptions underlying mineral resource estimates and the realization of such estimates; results of previous mining activities at the projects, and
detailed research and analysis completed by independent of the Company; research and estimates regarding the timing of delivery for long-lead
items; knowledge regarding the factors consultants and management involved in building a mine and other factors described in the technical
reports and Annual Information Form filed under the profile of the Company on SEDAR. Capital and operating cost estimates are based on results
of previous mining activities, research of the Company and independent consultants, recent estimates of construction and mining costs and other
factors that are set out in the scoping study. Production estimates are based on mine plans and production schedules, which have been developed
by the Company’s personnel and independent consultants. Forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and
other factors that may cause the actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from those
expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements, including but not limited to risks related to: timing and availability of external financing
on acceptable terms; unexpected events and delays during construction, expansion and start-up; variations in ore grade and recovery rates;
receipt and revocation of government approvals; actual results of exploration and mining activities; changes in project parameters as plans
continue to be refined; future prices of gold; failure of plant, equipment or processes to operate as anticipated; accidents, labour disputes and other
risks of the mining industry. Although management of the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to
differ materially from those contained in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated,
estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ
materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. The
Company does not undertake to update any forward-looking statements except in accordance with applicable securities laws.
Investors are advised that National Instrument NI 43-101 of the Canadian Securities Administrators requires that each category of mineral reserves
and mineral resources be reported separately. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.
Qualified Person
David Keough, MAusIMM of Crocodile Gold Australia Operations is a “qualified person” as such term is defined in National Instrument 43-101 and
has reviewed and confirmed the technical information and data included in this presentation.
Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors Concerning Estimates of Measured, Indicated or Inferred Resources
The information presented uses the terms “measured”, “indicated” and “inferred” mineral resources. United States investors are advised that while
such terms are recognized and required by Canadian regulations, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission does not recognize these
terms. “Inferred mineral resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and as to their economic and legal feasibility. It
cannot be assumed that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimates
of inferred mineral resources may not form the basis of feasibility or other economic studies. United States investors are cautioned not to assume
that all or any part of measured or indicated mineral resources will ever be converted into mineral reserves. United States investors are also
cautioned not to assume that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource exists, or is economically or legally mineable.
2
4. Our Assets
TSX:CRK
Production Development Mills
Howley Trend Cosmo Union Reefs Mill
open pit mine underground mine 2.4 mtpy
North Point Initial ore mined 3rd in operation
Qtr 2011
open pit mine Tom’s Gully Mill
oxide, low strip ratio Pine Creek- 240,000 tpy
dry season operation International Care and
(May – Nov) open pit mine maintenance
Princess Louise Production upon
open pit mine receipt of permits
dry season operation
(May – Nov)
Exploration Potential
>2,700 km2
4
5. Investment Advantage
TSX:CRK
Expanding production profile, decreasing cash costs
Outstanding potential to discover additional resources
3.175 million ounces M&I and 2.14 million ounces Inf.
Infrastructure replacement value = $200M
Adjacent to major highway and utilities
2010 production of 82,000 ounces
2011 production guidance: 85,000 – 100,000 ounces
5
6. 2011 – Growing Production
Throughout the Year TSX:CRK
2011 Key Catalysts
Production from Cosmo
• Initial ore expected 3rd Qtr -2011
• Will contribute 50% of ounces at full production (800,000 t.p.a. ore).
Production from Pine Creek- International, upon receipt of permits
Aggressive exploration program (Brownfields and Greenfields)
Increasing % of high grade mill feed throughout the year from Cosmo
2011 Guidance 2011 Production 2011 Major
Sources Capital
85,000-100,000 oz
Open Pits: Howley, Investments
Cash Cost US$875-$975/oz
Princess Louise, Pine
Creek/Union Reefs area Cosmo underground
Underground: Cosmo, Exploration
Brocks Creek
6
14. Mining Projects –
Cost Comparison TSX:CRK
• Cosmo development
provides leverage of
additional high-grade ore Open Pit Open Pit Open Pit Open Pit Underground
leading to significantly lower Example Example Example Example
Burnside Burnside Burnside Pine Creek Cosmo
cash costs/oz.
• Cosmo mining costs are Mining Cost per tonne $2.50 $2.50 $2.50 $2.50 $44.00
Strip Ratio 3.0 3.0 6.5 2.5
higher than open pits but
the ounces per vertical Mining Cost per Tonne Milled $10.00 $10.00 $18.75 $8.75 $44.00
Processing Cost $16.00 $16.00 $16.00 $16.00 $16.00
meter assist in lower mining Ore Haulage $8.25 $8.25 $8.25 $2.50 $8.50
costs for underground.
Site General & Administration $3.50 $3.50 $3.50 $3.50 $3.50
• Cosmo will eventually Total $/Tonne Milled $37.75 $37.75 $46.50 $30.75 $72.00
make up 40% of mill feed
Ore Grade 1.30 1.50 1.50 1.30 4.50
(50% of ounces) which will Recovery 90.0% 90.0% 93.0% 80.0% 92.0%
help lower overall costs and
improve overall production. Cost per Ounce $1,003 $870 $1,037 $920 $541
• Open Pits provide good
margin (US$400) to current
gold price. 14
15. Outside Exploration - Cosmo
Conductive/Magnetic Targets Associated With
the Cosmo Trend
TSX:CRK
Conductive/magnetic
Horizon
Identified
Gossan
AEM
15
18. Union Reefs & Pine Creek
Near Term, Low Cost Production TSX:CRK
New targets adjacent
to Union Reefs Mill
Potential for near
term, low cost
production
Currently prioritizing
targets
Potential production
mid 2011
Pine Creek Indicated
Resources increased
from 69,600 oz to
288,600 oz
18
19. Union Reefs
TSX:CRK
Historical Production/Intercepts:
Union Reefs = 800,000 oz Au
Pine Creek = 750,000 oz Au
Significant potential to increase existing resources
Union North: Lady Alice:
3m @ 24.56 g/t Au 5m @ 31.97 g/t Au
3m @ 45.10 g/t Au
Prospect Claim:
3m @ 37.50 g/t Au
Crosscourse – “Cosmo” scale target:
11m @ 6.60g/t Au 19m @ 10.62 g/t Au
36m @ 4.10 g/t Au 9m @ 24.40 g/t Au
16m @ 6.00 g/t Au 9m @ 4.00 g/t Au
19
20. Union Reef
Crosscourse Deposit TSX:CRK
1.5 g/t Au 4 g/t Au over 30 metres
Mineralized
Quartz Veins
Crosscourse Pit Mineralization (Photo taken in base of pit at Crosscourse in
2003 looking north. Mineralization is estimated to be around 30m wide at a grade
of 4g/t plunging to the north at around 60o. Red line is showing high grade zone
20
and orange line is lower grade margin (~1.5g/t).)
21. Union Reef Development
Conceptual Cost Profile TSX:CRK
•Using previous operating data,
existing cost regime, and
projected grades, deposits show Conceptual Conceptual Conceptual
excellent potential to deliver low Underground Underground Underground Underground
cost ounces to the production Cosmo Prospect Prospect Crosscourse
profile.
Union Reef Union Reef Union Reef
•Number 1 Exploration priority
Mining Cost per Tonne Milled $44.00 $80.00 $80.00 $44.00
- High-Grade vein targets
(Prospect & Lady Alice) Processing Cost $16.00 $16.00 $16.00 $16.00
Ore Haulage $8.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
- Bulk-Ore targets
(Crosscourse – “Cosmo Style”). Site General & Administration $3.50 $3.50 $3.50 $3.50
•Need to expand resources and Total $/Tonne Milled $72.00 $99.50 $99.50 $63.50
complete detailed mining studies
before deposits can be included Ore Grade 4.50 6.00 7.50 4.50
in any future production Recovery 92.0% 92.0% 92.0% 92.0%
forecasts.
Cost per Ounce $541 $561 $448 $477
•No guarantee that an economic
resource will be discovered to
justify a production decision.
21
23. MASSIVE SULPHIDE DEPOSITS
TSX:CRK
MOUNT BONNIE •
•
Historic Production
10,000t oxide @ 9g/t Au and 250g/t Ag
Historic Resource
• = Au eq 15.8g
650,000t - 1.7g/t Au, 279g/t Ag • 25,000t sulphide (supergene) @ 7g/t Au
= Au eq 9.3g/t or 194,000oz and 360g/t Ag = Au eq 17g
plus 9% Zn, 2% Pb, 0.5% Cu • Total production Au eq = 18,747oz
• Current Inferred Resources
Oxide Cap previously mined • 3,175,000t @ 2.1g/t Au, 101g/t Ag,
3.3% Zn, 0.76% Pb, 0.19% Cu
110,000t @ 7g/t Au and 230g/t Ag • Au eq = 4.85g or 495,000oz (only Au and Ag considered)
Au eq = 13.3g/t Au or 47,000oz Au
IRON BLOW
Aeromagnetics- tilt derivative
24. MAUD CREEK DEPOSIT
TSX:CRK
Resources Mined 173,600t @3.32g/t Au – 18,500oz
Indicated - 9,288,000t @3.1g/t Au for
935,000oz
Inferred - 1,072,000t @2.4g/t Au for
82,000oz Using a 1.0g/t Au cut-off
•Indicated Resource -Greater than 4.5g/t Au –
3.1 Mt @ 6.3 g/t for 628,000oz
•Partially refractory – metallurgical testing
indicates 90-95% recovery by flotation with
concentrates grading 6 opt.
•Near the town of Katherine – 8km haul road
to paved highway
•Significant asset to Crocodile Gold Cross section
•North south trending, good widths, excellent
configuration for underground mining
25. Regional Exploration Program
(Airborne Geophysics Survey Areas) TSX:CRK
Bons Rush
Mt. Ellison
Woolwonga
Brocks Creek
• 3,700 line Km’s Scheduled for
Cosmo Mine
Mid June
Mt. Bonnie
•Combined AEM and
magnetometer survey
•Geotech VTEM system- state of
the art
•Includes Moline and Maud Creek
tenements 25
26. Undervalued on Equivalent/oz Au
Comparison TSX:CRK
$600
KCN
EV/oz Au Producer Average
$500
= $US 134/oz
SMF
$400
Crocodile Gold
EV/oz Au (US$/oz)
= $US 59/oz
$300
AGI
HRG
$200
GAM
ORA NGD
ARZ AVO
AVM GSC
MFL Average
RSG
$100
EDV ALD JAG OGC ANV
CLF
P CRK NGX
RML
$0
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000
Source: NBF
Total Resources (Moz Au) 26
Updated as at Jan 17, 2011
27. Undervalued on Price to Net
Asset Value Comparison TSX:CRK
2
1.5
1
0.5x
0.5
0
ORA CRK AGI GSC LSG YRI ANO ELD AEM
Source: Raymond James Gold Producers 27
Updated as at June 14, 2011
28. Management & Board
TSX:CRK
Management Board of Directors
Chantal Lavoie, P.Eng. Stan Bharti, P.Eng.
President and Chief Executive Officer Chairman
David Keough
George Faught, CA
Chief Operating Officer
Steve Woodhead Chantal Lavoie, P.Eng.
Chief Financial Officer
Mike Hoffman, P.Eng.
Bill Nielsen, P. Geo
Vice President Exploration
Bruce Humphrey, P.Eng.
Colinda Parent
Vice President Business Development
Peter Tagliamonte, P.Eng.
28
29. Capital Structure
TSX:CRK
Share Structure (at May 31, 2011)
Analyst Coverage
Cormark Securities
TSX:CRK
Fraser Mackenzie
Shares Issued & 309,851,311 Raymond James
Outstanding Union Securities
Warrants 69,499,116 CRK Share Price
Options 18,441,204 $1.80
Fully Diluted 397,791,631 $1.60
$1.40
$1.20
Market Capitalization $239 Million $1.00
$0.80
(approximately, as at May 31, $0.60
2011) $0.40
$0.20
$0.00
29
30. Dec. 31, 2010
Reserve Summary TSX:CRK
CROCODILE GOLD MINERAL RESERVE STATEMENT -31 December, 2010
PROBABLE MINERAL RESERVE
Cut-off Gold Grade Ounces
Project Deposit Tonnes
(g/t) (g/t) Gold
Burnside Brocks Creek 7.1 34,000 8.6 9,300
Cosmo Deeps 3.1 3,100,000 4.2 420,000
Howley 1.0 340,000 1.6 18,000
North Point* 1.0 55,000 2.3 4,000
Princess Louise 1.0 200,000 1.5 9,700
Mottrams 1.0 980,000 1.2 39,000
Pine Creek Kohinoor 1.0 290,000 1.9 18,000
Cox 1.0 500,000 1.6 26,000
International 1.0 1,300,000 1.5 65,000
Gandys 1.0 480,000 1.7 26,000
South Enterprise 1.0 420,000 2.0 27,000
TOTAL 7,699,000 2.7 662,000
Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability
Gold Price: $US1000/oz
$A:$US 0.91
30
31. December 31st 2010
Resource Summary
31 December 2010
TSX:CRK
M+I Inferred
Tonnes Grade Ounces Tonnes Grade Ounces
Mt Bundy 20,241,000 1.0 664,800 10,513,000 1.0 350,800
Burnside 16,553,330 2.4 1,268,500 18,679,800 2.2 1,323,200
Union Reefs 239,000 2.4 18,200 3,740,000 1.7 204,200
Pine Creek 5,528,000 1.6 288,600 2,347,000 2.4 183,200
Maud Creek 9,288,000 3.1 935,000 1,072,000 2.4 82,000
Total 51,849,330 1.9 3,175,100 36,351,800 1.8 2,143,400
MINERAL RESOURCE STATEMENT (Other Commodities) - 31 December 2010
INFERRED MINERAL RESOURCE
Grade
Project Deposit Commodity Cut-off Tonnes Contained metal
(ppm)
Lead 1.0g/t Au 3,175,000 7,595 53,163,000 pounds
Iron Blow Zinc 1.0g/t Au 3,175,000 32,823 229,750,000 pounds
Burnside
Silver 1.0g/t Au 3,175,000 101 10,200,000 ounces
ThunderballC Uranium 200ppm 316,800 796 556,000 pounds
Note: C= Crocodile Gold has a 30% free carried interest in this deposit 31
32. Investor Contact Info
TSX:CRK
Chantal Lavoie www.crocgold.com
President and CEO
416-861-2964
clavoie@crocgold.com
Investor Relations
Rob Hopkins
416-861-5899
info@crocgold.com
Union Reefs Mill
A Member of the Forbes & Manhattan Group of Companies 32