Oral exam presentation

1. research framework exploration visualization an archiving system for work teams Final Project Oral Exam March 12, 2012 Rebecca Knowe Master of Graphic Design candidate NC State University committee: Martha Scotford, Chair Kermit Bailey Denise Gonzales-Crisp

2. research framework exploration visualization research question how can an archiving system represent the diversity of opinion and debate in the decision making process of a work team? How can the system guide team members to: 1. curate meeting notes that capture both diversity of opinion and group decisions? 2. review previous debates in a decision’s history? 3. revisit the group’s initial work in order to stay on track when making later stage decisions?

3. research framework exploration visualization research question how can an archiving system represent archiving system: automated digital repository artifacts of group collaboration the diversity of opinion and debate decision making: major decisions in the decision making process generative project-oriented process work team: of a work team? flatly-structured group professionals from diverse expertise areas How can the system guide team members to: 1. curate meeting notes that capture both diversity of How is the archive created? opinion and group decisions? 2. review previous debates in a decision’s history? How might a new member use the system? 3. revisit the group’s initial work in order to stay on track How might the system help revise decisions? when making later stage decisions?

4. research framework exploration visualization research evaluation of current technologies collaboration software (selected) Generally focus on in-the-moment collaboration spigit memtable User-generated Records voice and tags support interaction easier search google meeting archive docs browsing Supports Meeting history visualized detailed through multiple notetaking data inputs Access records through browsing document files

5. research framework exploration visualization group context group process map: activity being examined With possible points of intervention

6. research framework exploration visualization activity being examined keyton, 2006

7. research framework exploration visualization group context CONTEXTUAL DYNAMICS Small Groups as Complex Systems (Arrow et al, 2000) local dynamics: coordination GLOBAL DYNAMICS Ongoing patterning of interaction Among group’s elements: members, tasks, tools LOCAL DYNAMICS TEMPORAL global dynamics: development PATTERNS emerge MEMBERS System-level variables Emerge from local dynamics guide Shape local dynamics BEHAVIORAL global local activity PATTERNS variables contextual dynamics: adaptation COGNITIVE PATTERNS Group’s embedding context PHYSICAL ORGANIZATIONAL Group adjusts to and alters context features adjust to & alter Features shape, constrain local, CULTURAL TEMPORAL global dynamics embedding contexts

8. research framework exploration visualization group needs typical group Functional theory: decision-making oversights Process breaks down when evaluating ideas Groups discuss advantages but not disadvantages Members hide information unique to them Share information that has already been shared case studies Institute for Emerging Issues Commons group project unlike past projects Rapidly growing organization Shifting roles, processes not yet standardized Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon group Rotates marketing team every 2 years

9. research framework exploration visualization framework architecture of work scenario group process technology system Subquestions Subquestions Flatly structured (vs. hierarchical) Within Google Docs Modes: during, after meetings map to Work team (vs. crew, task force) Portal system aggregates docs Annotation, tagging: always 1 persona, allowed 1 visual study Corrections: approved by all Personas Designers Each at different points in Using iPads for travel portability Specificity setting: mid-range Good intentions process or learning purposes level of input by users Archive built by All in same meeting System also accessible by Vs. “auto” level of archiving (no community computer and smart phone user input) Studies focus Vs. most detailed input (like on individuals court recorder needs) Visual Studies Main data from Major decisions All on iPads: access to cloud Affordances: meetings Expect limited use for minor storage, range of interactions video Access to decisions System transcribes live audio recording supporting meetings, recognizes speakers voice recognition documentation language processing System “learns” over time, semantic web suggests tags based on tags of transcription similar content in past Subquestion 1: Creating the archive, showing its structure Persona 1: Designer, directing the work of other people Subquestion 2: How new member of the team might access archival information Persona 2: Design intern, not familiar with everything in the archive Subquestion 3: How seasoned member of team might access archival information Persona 3: Designer, in process a while, has contextual clues for guidance

10. research framework exploration visualization situated scenario institute for emerging issues Public policy think tank Raleigh, NC Interdisciplinary group making technology decisions “Emerging Issues Commons” project Interactive installation To facilitate groups of visitors

11. research framework exploration visualization exploration small studies outcomes Need for structured and easily understood tagging system Need for more than tagging: annotation Classifications of content data that system could feasibly recognize Need for incorporating visuals and other documentation Mapping visualizations need inherent structure Detailed scenario information and personas to contextualize Motivating users: system should not have to prompt, but meet

12. research framework exploration visualization visualization scenario snapshot scenario: All group members in a meeting Discuss fluctuating factors in interactive stations Will affect number of visitor seats at stations decision content map: Team discusses new light study Needs, constraints on number of interactive Requires limits on stations’ proximity to windows (glare) stations to be installed katie mark sam

13. research framework exploration visualization study 1. subquestion 1. Curating meeting notes that capture both diversity of opinion and group decisions Sam, 43 Senior designer Industrial designer specializing in museum design. Oversees team of industrial designers and architects. Uses an iPad while traveling Function • ses transcript to organize future work, tasks U • Agenda management • creen sharing to project presesentation S Goal • Record meeting, • ccess agenda plan, files projected onto screen A • Review/ tag/annotate transcript Optimal feelings • Control • Agility of teamwork/collaboration sam

14. research framework exploration visualization study 1. subquestion 1. Curating meeting notes that capture both diversity of opinion and group decisions agenda presentation agenda presentation agenda presentation 1. Knows light study will mean changes to the layout of the stations Wants to capture meeting transcript video feed details for his team in Washington, D.C. record transcript transcript 2. Uses system to set up check sound transcribing equipment. Will record video and audio. 3. Views dashboard to examine agenda. Discusses the findings of the light study. 4. Controls projection of agenda transcript agenda transcript quick agenda transcript presentation file. archive Shows attendees stations in solu. annotation current layout which are near pro/con windows and must now be moved. factor 5. Scans through transcript presentation key presentation key presentation key words words words when not participating. content content content Categorizes comments tags tags tags from discussion that will be important for his team, by archiving and tagging. 6. Annotates comments for use by team. Designates his annotations as tasks for the team. Tags meeting attendees as sources for further detail.

15. research framework exploration visualization study 1. subquestion 1. Curating meeting notes that capture both diversity of opinion and group decisions Motion study

16. AGENDA MEETING: 95% DD Work Session Review MEETING HUB MEETING HUB 95% DD Work Session Review Sherri Mark Winona Sam Melanie Katie Interactive Media Physical Design content user ex. studio dir. senior comm. design manager designer (GA) designer director intern • The Pulse • Emerging Voices (SS) (SS) (GA) • Connections Wall • Emerging Ideas • Action Components • Donor Wall Transcript • Voices Area • The Pulse Mark Volut quo quame ommo beatus, iusae endebis cones nobit • Ideas Area • Niches 11:33 miliberatur autatur? Quick Archive GROUP HUB • Additional Areas • Upstairs Area Sherri Quideliquis apelestiusa is exeratu mquide cum sin excea • Web App 11:58 iligenit exero officit quam iur, ande voluptatio. Nequia veriones et restemolore expellabo. Mark Ex et utestiuste sitatumenis delibust, officius es ut fugiam FILES 12:24 quatem lamus derchitis susdandis dolorro eum quis ut Interactive Media 95% Design optatur, quate nisto bea exceates ame voles ditibus apicte floor plan Development Work volesto ritiur, tem ate debit alicaes siminte lab ide dis et a MY HUB Session nes sitas niam accus, que eicil ent untur, ullectat volo estia Interactive Media budget Regulations endaest ut aut doloriosa ditatempor molorro blautenim eaquist quam volorit velest, sinumquae. Light study Katie At volupta el il imporeped ut ut aut illiquossit, alitiosam, sae 13:15 volupta nonsequam qui dolless usanihilit et in reperibus. Ucimiligent officime nonseque nit, volorib uscias velit PRESENTATION slide 4/30 perferum fuga. Itaque quatio te sam, quae maio invel id quate repere explab ipsandit optae inctur? Us. Rum reic te et quissenet es aditis maximin velende aut id mo endis et vendi. Keywords: Gallagher Assoc. budget Interactive stations Second Story Microsoft Surface IEI tables Map view Light study Suggested number of visitors environmental content tags: constraints light study Interactive Media floor plan number of stations implications NEW

21. AGENDA MEETING: 95% DD Work Session Review MEETING HUB MEETING HUB 95% DD Work Session Review Sherri Mark Winona Sam Melanie Katie Interactive Media Physical Design content user ex. studio dir. senior comm. design manager designer (GA) designer director intern • The Pulse • Emerging Voices (SS) (SS) (GA) • Connections Wall • Emerging Ideas • Action Components • Donor Wall Transcript • Voices Area • The Pulse Mark Volut quo quame ommo beatus, iusae endebis cones nobit • Ideas Area • Niches 11:33 miliberatur autatur? Quick Archive GROUP HUB • Additional Areas • Upstairs Area Sherri Quideliquis apelestiusa is exeratu mquide cum sin excea sin excea Quideliquis apelestiusa is exeratu mquide cum • Web App 11:58 iligenit exero officit quam iur, ande voluptatio. voluptatio. Nequia iligenit exero officit quam iur, ande Nequia veriones et restemolore expellabo. expellabo. veriones et restemolore Mark Ex et utestiuste sitatumenis delibust, officius es ut fugiam FILES 12:24 quatem lamus derchitis susdandis dolorro eum quis ut Interactive Media 95% Design optatur, quate nisto bea exceates ame voles ditibus apicte floor plan Development Work volesto ritiur, tem ate debit alicaes siminte lab ide dis et a MY HUB Session nes sitas niam accus, que eicil ent untur, ullectat volo estia Interactive Media budget Regulations endaest ut aut doloriosa ditatempor molorro blautenim eaquist quam volorit velest, sinumquae. Light study Katie At volupta el il imporeped ut ut aut illiquossit, alitiosam, sae 13:15 volupta nonsequam qui dolless usanihilit et in reperibus. Ucimiligent officime nonseque nit, volorib uscias velit PRESENTATION slide 4/30 perferum fuga. Itaque quatio te sam, quae maio invel id quate repere explab ipsandit optae inctur? Us. Rum reic te et quissenet es aditis maximin velende aut id mo endis et vendi. Keywords: Gallagher Assoc. budget Interactive stations Second Story Microsoft Surface IEI tables Map view Light study Suggested number of visitors environmental content tags: constraints light study Interactive Media floor plan number of stations implications NEW

22. AGENDA MEETING: 95% DD Work Session Review MEETING HUB MEETING HUB 95% DD Work Session Review Sherri Mark Winona Sam Melanie Katie Interactive Media Physical Design content user ex. studio dir. senior comm. design manager designer (GA) designer director intern • The Pulse • Emerging Voices (SS) (SS) (GA) • Connections Wall • Emerging Ideas • Action Components • Donor Wall Transcript • Voices Area • The Pulse Mark Volut quo quame ommo beatus, iusae endebis cones nobit • Ideas Area • Niches 11:33 miliberatur autatur? Quick Archive GROUP HUB • Additional Areas • Upstairs Area Sherri Quideliquis apelestiusa is exeratu mquide cum sin excea • Web App 11:58 iligenit exero officit quam iur, ande voluptatio. Nequia mquide cum sin excea Quideliquis apelestiusa is exeratu iligenit exero officit quam iur, ande voluptatio. Nequia veriones et restemolore expellabo. veriones et restemolore expellabo. Mark Ex et utestiuste sitatumenis delibust, officius es ut fugiam FILES 12:24 quatem lamus derchitis susdandis dolorro eum quis ut Interactive Media 95% Design optatur, quate nisto bea exceates ame voles ditibus apicte floor plan Development Work volesto ritiur, tem ate debit alicaes siminte lab ide dis et a MY HUB Session nes sitas niam accus, que eicil ent untur, ullectat volo estia Interactive Media budget Regulations endaest ut aut doloriosa ditatempor molorro blautenim eaquist quam volorit velest, sinumquae. Light study Katie At volupta el il imporeped ut ut aut illiquossit, alitiosam, sae 13:15 volupta nonsequam qui dolless usanihilit et in reperibus. Ucimiligent officime nonseque nit, volorib uscias velit PRESENTATION slide 4/30 perferum fuga. Itaque quatio te sam, quae maio invel id quate repere explab ipsandit optae inctur? Us. Rum reic te et quissenet es aditis maximin velende aut id mo endis et vendi. Keywords: Gallagher Assoc. budget Interactive stations Second Story Microsoft Surface IEI tables Map view Light study Suggested number of visitors environmental content tags: constraints light study Interactive Media floor plan number of stations implications NEW

23. AGENDA MEETING: 95% DD Work Session Review MEETING HUB MEETING HUB 95% DD Work Session Review Sherri Mark Winona Sam Melanie Katie Interactive Media Physical Design content user ex. studio dir. senior comm. design manager designer (GA) designer director intern • The Pulse • Emerging Voices (SS) (SS) (GA) • Connections Wall • Emerging Ideas • Action Components • Donor Wall Transcript Quick Archive • Voices Area • The Pulse Mark Volut quo quame ommo beatus, iusae endebis cones nobit • Ideas Area • Niches 11:33 miliberatur autatur? Solution GROUP HUB • Additional Areas • Upstairs Area Sherri Quideliquis apelestiusa is exeratu mquide cum sin excea • Web App 11:58 iligenit exero officit quam iur, ande voluptatio. Nequia veriones et restemolore expellabo. Quideliquis apelestiusa is exeratu mquide cum Mark iligenit exero officit es ut Proande Ex et utestiuste sitatumenis delibust, officiusquam fugiam voluptatio. iur, FILES 12:24 quatem lamus derchitis susdandis et restemolore expellabo. veriones dolorro eum quis ut Interactive Media 95% Design optatur, quate nisto bea exceates ame voles ditibus apicte floor plan Development Work volesto ritiur, tem ate debit alicaes siminte lab ide dis et a MY HUB Session nes sitas niam accus, que eicil ent untur, ullectat volo estia Interactive Media budget Regulations endaest ut aut doloriosa ditatempor molorro blautenim Con eaquist quam volorit velest, sinumquae. Light study Katie At volupta el il imporeped ut ut aut illiquossit, alitiosam, sae 13:15 volupta nonsequam qui dolless usanihilit et in reperibus. Ucimiligent officime nonseque nit, volorib uscias velit factor Other PRESENTATION slide 4/30 perferum fuga. Itaque quatio te sam, quae maio invel id quate repere explab ipsandit optae inctur? Us. Rum reic te et quissenet es aditis maximin velende aut id mo endis et vendi. Keywords: Gallagher Assoc. budget Interactive stations Second Story Microsoft Surface IEI tables Map view Light study Suggested number of visitors environmental content tags: constraints light study Interactive Media floor plan number of stations implications NEW

24. AGENDA MEETING: 95% DD Work Session Review MEETING HUB MEETING HUB 95% DD Work Session Review Sherri Mark Winona Sam Melanie Katie Interactive Media Physical Design content user ex. studio dir. senior comm. design manager designer (GA) designer director intern • The Pulse • Emerging Voices (SS) (SS) (GA) • Connections Wall • Emerging Ideas • Action Components • Donor Wall Transcript Quick Archive • Voices Area • The Pulse Mark Volut quo quame ommo beatus, iusae endebis cones nobit • Ideas Area • Niches 11:33 miliberatur autatur? Solution GROUP HUB • Additional Areas • Upstairs Area Sherri Quideliquis apelestiusa is exeratu mquide cum sin excea • Web App 11:58 iligenit exero officit quam iur, ande voluptatio. Nequia veriones et restemolore expellabo. Mark Pro Ex et utestiuste sitatumenis delibust, officius es ut fugiam FILES 12:24 quatem lamus derchitis susdandis dolorro eum quis ut Interactive Media 95% Design optatur, quate nisto bea exceates ame voles ditibus apicte Quideliquis apelestiusa is exeratu mquide cum floor plan Development Work volesto ritiur, tem ate debit alicaes siminte lab idequam iur, ande voluptatio. iligenit exero officit dis et a MY HUB Session nes sitas niam accus, que eicil ent untur, ullectat volo estia veriones et restemolore expellabo. Interactive Media budget Regulations endaest ut aut doloriosa ditatempor molorro blautenim Con eaquist quam volorit velest, sinumquae. Light study Katie At volupta el il imporeped ut ut aut illiquossit, alitiosam, sae 13:15 volupta nonsequam qui dolless usanihilit et in reperibus. Ucimiligent officime nonseque nit, volorib uscias velit factor Other PRESENTATION slide 4/30 perferum fuga. Itaque quatio te sam, quae maio invel id quate repere explab ipsandit optae inctur? Us. Rum reic te et quissenet es aditis maximin velende aut id mo endis et vendi. Keywords: Gallagher Assoc. budget Interactive stations Second Story Microsoft Surface IEI tables Map view Light study Suggested number of visitors environmental content tags: constraints light study Interactive Media floor plan number of stations implications NEW

25. AGENDA MEETING: 95% DD Work Session Review MEETING HUB MEETING HUB 95% DD Work Session Review Sherri Mark Winona Sam Melanie Katie Interactive Media Physical Design content user ex. studio dir. senior comm. design manager designer (GA) designer director intern • The Pulse • Emerging Voices (SS) (SS) (GA) • Connections Wall • Emerging Ideas • Action Components • Donor Wall Transcript Quick Archive • Voices Area • The Pulse Mark Con Volut quo quame ommo beatus, iusae endebis cones nobit • Ideas Area • Niches 11:33 Quideliquis apelestiusa is miliberatur autatur? GROUP HUB exeratu mquide cum sin • Additional Areas • Upstairs Area Sherri Quideliquis apelestiusa is exeratu mquide cum sin excea officit excea iligenit exero • Web App 11:58 quam iur, ande voluptatio. iligenit exero officit quam iur, ande voluptatio. Nequia Nequia veriones et veriones et restemolore expellabo. Suggested Mark Ex et utestiuste sitatumenis delibust, officius es ut fugiam archive phrases: FILES 12:24 quatem lamus derchitis susdandis dolorro eum quisinteractive brands choice of ut Interactive Media 95% Design optatur, quate nisto bea exceates ame volesnew station layout ditibus apicte phased station installation floor plan Development Work volesto ritiur, tem ate debit alicaes siminte lab ide dis et a NEW MY HUB Session nes sitas niam accus, que eicil ent untur, ullectat volo estia Interactive Media Suggested budget Regulations endaest ut aut doloriosa ditatempor molorrocontent tags: blautenim eaquist quam volorit velest, sinumquae. environmental constraints Light study number of stations Katie At volupta el il imporeped ut ut aut illiquossit,light study implications alitiosam, sae 13:15 volupta nonsequam qui dolless usanihilit et in reperibus. NEW MORE OK Ucimiligent officime nonseque nit, volorib uscias velit PRESENTATION slide 4/30 perferum fuga. Itaque quatio te sam, quae maio invel id Solution Pro quate repere explab ipsandit optae inctur? Us. Rum reic te et quissenet es aditis maximin velende aut id mo endis etfactor Other vendi. Keywords: Gallagher Assoc. budget Interactive stations Second Story Microsoft Surface IEI tables Map view Light study Suggested number of visitors environmental content tags: constraints light study Interactive Media floor plan number of stations implications NEW

Oral exam presentation

Recomendados

Recomendados

Más contenido relacionado

Similar a Oral exam presentation

Similar a Oral exam presentation (20)

Más de curlybecca

Más de curlybecca (20)

Último

Último (20)

Oral exam presentation