We are in the process of a large scale consortial implementation project for Relais D2D. Our session will describe the process and the hurdles in creating a consortial wide shared catalog project. Presentation by Ryan Litsey and Jennifer Duncan

1.  
Relais D2D and the Greater Western Library Alliance

2.  Arizona State University
 Baylor University
 Brigham Young University
 Colorado State University
 Iowa State University Library
 Kansas State University
 Oklahoma State University
 Oregon State University
 Rice University
 Southern Illinois University, Carbondale
 Southern Methodist University
 Texas A&M University
 Texas Tech
 University of Arizona
 University of Arkansas
 University of Colorado, Boulder
 University of Hawaii at Manoa
 University of Houston
 University of Illinois, Chicago
 University of Kansas
 University of Missouri-Columbia
 University of Nevada, Las Vegas
 University of New Mexico
 University of Oklahoma
 University of Oregon
 University of Southern California
 University of Texas, Austin
 University of Utah
 University of Washington
 University of Wyoming
 Utah State University
 Washington State University
 Washington University in St. Louis

4. Resource Sharing and Document
Delivery
+
Collection Development

5.  Print & Electronic Collection Management Task Force
Charge
o Item 1: Develop a program to efficiently analyze and remove
duplication from the existing monograph collection
o Item 2: Develop strategies to reduce duplicate materials
purchases via existing tools and technologies

6.  Vast Distances Separate our Schools
 Enormity of the Shared Collection
 Difficult Decision Making
 Sacrificing Prestige

7.  Budgets Remain Flat
 Space Constraints
 Reality of the Significance of Use and Demonstrable ROI
in State Universities
 Faculty Recruitment & Retention

8.  AFU, 817,96
 AZS, 247,103
 AZU, 461,282
 COD, 223,883
 COF, 141,478
 CSL, 603,424
 FKS, 34,471
 HUH, 601,725
 IAY, 94,649
 ILU, 176,887
 IQU, 177,588
 ISM, 62,808
 IWA, 215,716
 IXA, 1,105,697
 IYU, 136,651
 KKS, 191,679
 KKU, 454,647
 MUU, 291,507
 NTE, 243,059
 OKS, 162,858
 OKU, 439,432
 ORE, 103,923
 ORU, 232,350
 RCE, 164,165
 SOI, 194,424
 TXA, 366,201
 TXH, 102,920
 UBY, 884,417
 UNL, 66,304
 UUM, 382,287
 UUS, 114,586
 WAU, 1,010,499
 WTU, 216,507
 WYA, 12,293

9.  AFU, 32,129
 AZS, 55,260
 AZU, 76,712
 COD, 70,384
 COF, 38738
 CSL, 74662
 FKS, 1,918
 HUH, 64,729
 IAY, 43,366
 ILU, 62,391
 IQU, 47,770
 ISM, 30,280
 IWA, 48,865
 IXA, 85,016
 IYU, 23,367
 KKS, 41,797
 KKU, 59,847
 MUU, 64,566
 NTE, 59,898
 OKS, 55,742
 OKU, 67,727
 ORE, 52,150
 ORU, 58,109
 RCE, 42,290
 SOI, 68,661
 TXA, 58,842
 TXH, 44,589
 UBY, 75,537
 UNL, 28,234
 UUM, 73,690
 UUS, 22,046
 WAU, 83,319
 WTU, 59,992
 WYA, 602

10.  AFU, 2,666
 AZS, 2,665
 AZU, 2,670
 COD, 2,672
 COF, 2,665
 CSL, 2,673
 FKS, 429
 HUH, 2,659
 IAY, 2,667
 ILU, 2,673
 IQU, 2,672
 ISM, 2,653
 IWA, 2,670
 IXA, 2,672
 IYU, 2,649
 KKS, 2,654
 KKU, 2,670
 MUU, 2,653
 NTE, 2,668
 OKS, 2,633
 OKU, 2,669
 ORE, 2,644
 ORU, 2,668
 RCE, 2,641
 SOI, 2,667
 TXA, 2,665
 TXH, 2,658
 UBY, 2,666
 UNL, 2,488
 UUM, 2,673
 UUS, 2,656
 WAU, 2,675
 WTU, 2,661
 WYA, 136

11.  Cooperative Collection Development
 Cost Savings
 Improved ILL Services
 Load Leveling
 E-Book Discoverabilty

12. A system like BorrowItNow is essential to fully realize the
possibilities of consortial collaborative collection development.
With the implementation of this service, we will be able to
present our local constituents with a catalog of tens of millions
of titles.

13.  Presented to the GWLA board in Fall 2012
o A division between full implementers and lenders only
 Summer 2013
o August - Implementation began
• Borrowing add-ons are sent out
• Lending's server add-on for full implementers sent out
• Configuration of local ILLiad’s
 September 2013
o All full implementers are fully operational
o All lender only targets are fully operational
o Patrons have real-time location and call number access to 31
Research libraries

14.  Patron places the request through their local discovery
layer

15.  The results lists shows real-time location and availability

16.  The pertinent information for the request utilizes Open
URL to map an ILLiad request form

17.  For requests that are not submitted through the Relais
Discovery layer the staff can utilize the BorrowItNow
add-on

19.  Borrowing – Full Implementers
o Borrowing add-on
o Workform mapping
o Open URL configuration
o Request form mapping
o Routing rule for OCLC sending
o Direct Request enabled
 Lending
o Lending server add-on
o Lending routing rule
 Relais Configurations
o Z39.50 configurations
o Discovery layer

20.  Jennifer Duncan
jennifer.duncan@usu.edu
 Ryan Litsey
ryan.litsey@ttu.edu