SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 31
Recent Developments In Oklahoma Family Law - 2009  December 3, 10, 2009 Materials – Julie S. Rivers  Slides - David A. Tracy Julie S Rivers PLLC   Naylor, Williams & Tracy, Inc 512 NW 12th St.     1701 S. Boston Ave. Oklahoma City, Oklahoma  73103  Tulsa, OK  74119 405-232-6357  918-582-8000 [email_address]   [email_address]
[object Object]
New Juvenile Code ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
New Juvenile Code ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
New Juvenile Code ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
New Juvenile Code ,[object Object],[object Object]
New Juvenile Code ,[object Object],[object Object]
Protection From Abuse ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object]
Kennedy v. E. I. DuPont 129 S. Ct. 865 (2009) ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Elliott v. Elliott 2009 OK CIV APP 2, ___ P.3d ___ ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
In Re Marriage of King 2009 OK CIV APP 49, 212 P.3d 1232 ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
McQuay v. McQuay 2009 OK CIV APP 59, ___ P.3d ___ ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object]
Buffalo v. Buffalo 2009 OK CIV APP 44, 211 P.3d 923 ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Redmond v. Cauthron, 2009 OK CIV APP 46, 211 P.3d 233 ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Moore v. Moore  2009 OK CIV APP 27, 209 P.3d 318 ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object]
DHS v. Palmer 2009 OK CIV APP 38, 212 P.3d 491 ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object]
Adoption of L.J.S. 2009 OK CIV APP 60, 216 P.3d 300 ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
 
[object Object]
Seirafi-Pour v. Bagherinassab, 2008 OK CIV APP 98, 197 P.3d 1097 ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
In Re Marriage of Lahman 2009 OK CIV APP 26, 209 P.3d 793 ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Cooper v. Cooper 2009 OK CIV APP 73 ___ P.3d ___ ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
In Re Rowe 2009 OK 66, ___ P.3d ___ ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object]
Marriage of Sanel,  2009 OK CIV APP 7, 217 P.3d 141 ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Nichols v. Nichols 2009 OK 43, ___ P.3d ___ ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Recent Developments In Oklahoma Family Law - 2009  December 3, 10, 2009 Materials – Julie S. Rivers  Slides - David A. Tracy Julie S Rivers PLLC   Naylor, Williams & Tracy, Inc 512 NW 12th St.     1701 S. Boston Ave. Oklahoma City, Oklahoma  73103  Tulsa, OK  74119 405-232-6357  918-582-8000 [email_address]   [email_address]

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente

236668928 adoption-cases-summary
236668928 adoption-cases-summary236668928 adoption-cases-summary
236668928 adoption-cases-summaryhomeworkping3
 
West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals Memorandum Decision No. 18-0230 (Putna...
West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals Memorandum Decision No. 18-0230 (Putna...West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals Memorandum Decision No. 18-0230 (Putna...
West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals Memorandum Decision No. 18-0230 (Putna...Putnam Reporter
 
Usana, Company Of Distinction
Usana, Company Of DistinctionUsana, Company Of Distinction
Usana, Company Of Distinctionbradshapiro
 
Family Court exploitation and harm to families by court appointees in Illinois
 Family Court exploitation and harm to families by court appointees in Illinois Family Court exploitation and harm to families by court appointees in Illinois
Family Court exploitation and harm to families by court appointees in IllinoisLinda Shelton
 
SAVE-VAWA-Restraining-Orders
SAVE-VAWA-Restraining-OrdersSAVE-VAWA-Restraining-Orders
SAVE-VAWA-Restraining-OrdersL. Gabriel Womack
 
Rooney Excerpt from Appellant Legal Brief
Rooney Excerpt from Appellant Legal BriefRooney Excerpt from Appellant Legal Brief
Rooney Excerpt from Appellant Legal BriefCaitlin Rooney
 
child abandonment
child abandonmentchild abandonment
child abandonmentguest2e27fe
 
Court Case Example - Professor W.A. Kritsonis
Court Case Example - Professor W.A. KritsonisCourt Case Example - Professor W.A. Kritsonis
Court Case Example - Professor W.A. KritsonisWilliam Kritsonis
 
Court Case Example - Dr. William Allan Kritsonis
Court Case Example - Dr. William Allan KritsonisCourt Case Example - Dr. William Allan Kritsonis
Court Case Example - Dr. William Allan KritsonisWilliam Kritsonis
 
I'm Never Going to Die and My Partner's Never Going to Leave Me - RKWN event ...
I'm Never Going to Die and My Partner's Never Going to Leave Me - RKWN event ...I'm Never Going to Die and My Partner's Never Going to Leave Me - RKWN event ...
I'm Never Going to Die and My Partner's Never Going to Leave Me - RKWN event ...Russell_Kennedy
 
Jane Sharks - Joint Ownership – A Potential Minefield for Advisors
Jane Sharks -  Joint Ownership – A Potential Minefield for AdvisorsJane Sharks -  Joint Ownership – A Potential Minefield for Advisors
Jane Sharks - Joint Ownership – A Potential Minefield for AdvisorsEstate Planning Council of Abbotsford
 
Family law - Customary and statutory adoption (Malaysia)
Family law - Customary and statutory adoption (Malaysia)Family law - Customary and statutory adoption (Malaysia)
Family law - Customary and statutory adoption (Malaysia)surrenderyourthrone
 
Jackson v. Jackson COMPLAINTfor DIVORCE
Jackson v. Jackson  COMPLAINTfor DIVORCEJackson v. Jackson  COMPLAINTfor DIVORCE
Jackson v. Jackson COMPLAINTfor DIVORCETerry Evers
 

La actualidad más candente (20)

236668928 adoption-cases-summary
236668928 adoption-cases-summary236668928 adoption-cases-summary
236668928 adoption-cases-summary
 
In re AJR
In re AJRIn re AJR
In re AJR
 
West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals Memorandum Decision No. 18-0230 (Putna...
West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals Memorandum Decision No. 18-0230 (Putna...West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals Memorandum Decision No. 18-0230 (Putna...
West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals Memorandum Decision No. 18-0230 (Putna...
 
5D11-2275.op
5D11-2275.op5D11-2275.op
5D11-2275.op
 
Absolute Community Cases
Absolute Community  CasesAbsolute Community  Cases
Absolute Community Cases
 
Usana, Company Of Distinction
Usana, Company Of DistinctionUsana, Company Of Distinction
Usana, Company Of Distinction
 
Family Court exploitation and harm to families by court appointees in Illinois
 Family Court exploitation and harm to families by court appointees in Illinois Family Court exploitation and harm to families by court appointees in Illinois
Family Court exploitation and harm to families by court appointees in Illinois
 
SAVE-VAWA-Restraining-Orders
SAVE-VAWA-Restraining-OrdersSAVE-VAWA-Restraining-Orders
SAVE-VAWA-Restraining-Orders
 
Rooney Excerpt from Appellant Legal Brief
Rooney Excerpt from Appellant Legal BriefRooney Excerpt from Appellant Legal Brief
Rooney Excerpt from Appellant Legal Brief
 
child abandonment
child abandonmentchild abandonment
child abandonment
 
Court Case Example - Professor W.A. Kritsonis
Court Case Example - Professor W.A. KritsonisCourt Case Example - Professor W.A. Kritsonis
Court Case Example - Professor W.A. Kritsonis
 
Court of Appeals decision
Court of Appeals decisionCourt of Appeals decision
Court of Appeals decision
 
Court Case Example - Dr. William Allan Kritsonis
Court Case Example - Dr. William Allan KritsonisCourt Case Example - Dr. William Allan Kritsonis
Court Case Example - Dr. William Allan Kritsonis
 
I'm Never Going to Die and My Partner's Never Going to Leave Me - RKWN event ...
I'm Never Going to Die and My Partner's Never Going to Leave Me - RKWN event ...I'm Never Going to Die and My Partner's Never Going to Leave Me - RKWN event ...
I'm Never Going to Die and My Partner's Never Going to Leave Me - RKWN event ...
 
Divorce 2010,
Divorce 2010,Divorce 2010,
Divorce 2010,
 
Jane Sharks - Joint Ownership – A Potential Minefield for Advisors
Jane Sharks -  Joint Ownership – A Potential Minefield for AdvisorsJane Sharks -  Joint Ownership – A Potential Minefield for Advisors
Jane Sharks - Joint Ownership – A Potential Minefield for Advisors
 
04121601shd
04121601shd04121601shd
04121601shd
 
Family law - Customary and statutory adoption (Malaysia)
Family law - Customary and statutory adoption (Malaysia)Family law - Customary and statutory adoption (Malaysia)
Family law - Customary and statutory adoption (Malaysia)
 
Sample collection letter
Sample collection letterSample collection letter
Sample collection letter
 
Jackson v. Jackson COMPLAINTfor DIVORCE
Jackson v. Jackson  COMPLAINTfor DIVORCEJackson v. Jackson  COMPLAINTfor DIVORCE
Jackson v. Jackson COMPLAINTfor DIVORCE
 

Similar a Recent Developments 2009

2011 Oklahoma Family Law - Recent Developments
2011 Oklahoma Family Law - Recent Developments2011 Oklahoma Family Law - Recent Developments
2011 Oklahoma Family Law - Recent Developmentsdavidtracy
 
362017 Castle Rock v. Gonzales, 545 US 748 - Supreme Court 2.docx
362017 Castle Rock v. Gonzales, 545 US 748 - Supreme Court 2.docx362017 Castle Rock v. Gonzales, 545 US 748 - Supreme Court 2.docx
362017 Castle Rock v. Gonzales, 545 US 748 - Supreme Court 2.docxtamicawaysmith
 
WV Supreme Court Opinion - Mark V Halburn v. Dolores J Halburn #13-0591 11/13...
WV Supreme Court Opinion - Mark V Halburn v. Dolores J Halburn #13-0591 11/13...WV Supreme Court Opinion - Mark V Halburn v. Dolores J Halburn #13-0591 11/13...
WV Supreme Court Opinion - Mark V Halburn v. Dolores J Halburn #13-0591 11/13...Putnam Reporter
 
Petition to Modify - Weaver
Petition to Modify - WeaverPetition to Modify - Weaver
Petition to Modify - WeaverAndrew Rawlings
 
Nominal Alimony: The Not-So-New Kid on the Block
Nominal Alimony: The Not-So-New Kid on the BlockNominal Alimony: The Not-So-New Kid on the Block
Nominal Alimony: The Not-So-New Kid on the Blocknlashway
 
2007 PBI Family Law Update - Support
2007 PBI Family Law Update - Support2007 PBI Family Law Update - Support
2007 PBI Family Law Update - SupportBrian Vertz
 
109 The mother ’s homeschool-ing of the minor child .docx
109 The mother ’s homeschool-ing of the minor child .docx109 The mother ’s homeschool-ing of the minor child .docx
109 The mother ’s homeschool-ing of the minor child .docxpaynetawnya
 
2008 Support Update
2008 Support Update2008 Support Update
2008 Support UpdateBrian Vertz
 
2011 child support law update
2011 child support law update 2011 child support law update
2011 child support law update Brian Vertz
 
2011 support law update
2011 support law update 2011 support law update
2011 support law update Brian Vertz
 
Case law updatepaper5807
Case law updatepaper5807Case law updatepaper5807
Case law updatepaper5807screaminc
 
Order reversing in part and affirming in part, the Final Divorce Order - Halb...
Order reversing in part and affirming in part, the Final Divorce Order - Halb...Order reversing in part and affirming in part, the Final Divorce Order - Halb...
Order reversing in part and affirming in part, the Final Divorce Order - Halb...Putnam Reporter
 
Reinstatement of Parental Rights in Georgia
Reinstatement of Parental Rights in GeorgiaReinstatement of Parental Rights in Georgia
Reinstatement of Parental Rights in Georgiabartoncenter
 
Deprivation rules 2014
Deprivation rules 2014Deprivation rules 2014
Deprivation rules 2014screaminc
 
Ch06 deprivation-dependency
Ch06 deprivation-dependencyCh06 deprivation-dependency
Ch06 deprivation-dependencyscreaminc
 
1045Fla.GULLIVER SCHOOLS, INC. v. SNAYCite as 137 So.3d 1045.docx
1045Fla.GULLIVER SCHOOLS, INC. v. SNAYCite as 137 So.3d 1045.docx1045Fla.GULLIVER SCHOOLS, INC. v. SNAYCite as 137 So.3d 1045.docx
1045Fla.GULLIVER SCHOOLS, INC. v. SNAYCite as 137 So.3d 1045.docxaulasnilda
 

Similar a Recent Developments 2009 (20)

2011 Oklahoma Family Law - Recent Developments
2011 Oklahoma Family Law - Recent Developments2011 Oklahoma Family Law - Recent Developments
2011 Oklahoma Family Law - Recent Developments
 
362017 Castle Rock v. Gonzales, 545 US 748 - Supreme Court 2.docx
362017 Castle Rock v. Gonzales, 545 US 748 - Supreme Court 2.docx362017 Castle Rock v. Gonzales, 545 US 748 - Supreme Court 2.docx
362017 Castle Rock v. Gonzales, 545 US 748 - Supreme Court 2.docx
 
WV Supreme Court Opinion - Mark V Halburn v. Dolores J Halburn #13-0591 11/13...
WV Supreme Court Opinion - Mark V Halburn v. Dolores J Halburn #13-0591 11/13...WV Supreme Court Opinion - Mark V Halburn v. Dolores J Halburn #13-0591 11/13...
WV Supreme Court Opinion - Mark V Halburn v. Dolores J Halburn #13-0591 11/13...
 
Petition to Modify - Weaver
Petition to Modify - WeaverPetition to Modify - Weaver
Petition to Modify - Weaver
 
Nominal Alimony: The Not-So-New Kid on the Block
Nominal Alimony: The Not-So-New Kid on the BlockNominal Alimony: The Not-So-New Kid on the Block
Nominal Alimony: The Not-So-New Kid on the Block
 
2007 PBI Family Law Update - Support
2007 PBI Family Law Update - Support2007 PBI Family Law Update - Support
2007 PBI Family Law Update - Support
 
109 The mother ’s homeschool-ing of the minor child .docx
109 The mother ’s homeschool-ing of the minor child .docx109 The mother ’s homeschool-ing of the minor child .docx
109 The mother ’s homeschool-ing of the minor child .docx
 
2008 Support Update
2008 Support Update2008 Support Update
2008 Support Update
 
Estates/Probate 6
Estates/Probate 6Estates/Probate 6
Estates/Probate 6
 
2011 child support law update
2011 child support law update 2011 child support law update
2011 child support law update
 
2011 support law update
2011 support law update 2011 support law update
2011 support law update
 
Case law updatepaper5807
Case law updatepaper5807Case law updatepaper5807
Case law updatepaper5807
 
Estates/Probate 7
Estates/Probate 7Estates/Probate 7
Estates/Probate 7
 
Order reversing in part and affirming in part, the Final Divorce Order - Halb...
Order reversing in part and affirming in part, the Final Divorce Order - Halb...Order reversing in part and affirming in part, the Final Divorce Order - Halb...
Order reversing in part and affirming in part, the Final Divorce Order - Halb...
 
4D14-3439.op
4D14-3439.op4D14-3439.op
4D14-3439.op
 
Reinstatement of Parental Rights in Georgia
Reinstatement of Parental Rights in GeorgiaReinstatement of Parental Rights in Georgia
Reinstatement of Parental Rights in Georgia
 
Deprivation rules 2014
Deprivation rules 2014Deprivation rules 2014
Deprivation rules 2014
 
Ch06 deprivation-dependency
Ch06 deprivation-dependencyCh06 deprivation-dependency
Ch06 deprivation-dependency
 
1045Fla.GULLIVER SCHOOLS, INC. v. SNAYCite as 137 So.3d 1045.docx
1045Fla.GULLIVER SCHOOLS, INC. v. SNAYCite as 137 So.3d 1045.docx1045Fla.GULLIVER SCHOOLS, INC. v. SNAYCite as 137 So.3d 1045.docx
1045Fla.GULLIVER SCHOOLS, INC. v. SNAYCite as 137 So.3d 1045.docx
 
B243062 cpr marina
B243062 cpr marinaB243062 cpr marina
B243062 cpr marina
 

Recent Developments 2009

  • 1. Recent Developments In Oklahoma Family Law - 2009 December 3, 10, 2009 Materials – Julie S. Rivers Slides - David A. Tracy Julie S Rivers PLLC Naylor, Williams & Tracy, Inc 512 NW 12th St. 1701 S. Boston Ave. Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73103 Tulsa, OK 74119 405-232-6357 918-582-8000 [email_address] [email_address]
  • 2.
  • 3.
  • 4.
  • 5.
  • 6.
  • 7.
  • 8.
  • 9.
  • 10.
  • 11.
  • 12.
  • 13.
  • 14.
  • 15.
  • 16.
  • 17.
  • 18.
  • 19.
  • 20.
  • 21.
  • 22.  
  • 23.
  • 24.
  • 25.
  • 26.
  • 27.
  • 28.
  • 29.
  • 30.
  • 31. Recent Developments In Oklahoma Family Law - 2009 December 3, 10, 2009 Materials – Julie S. Rivers Slides - David A. Tracy Julie S Rivers PLLC Naylor, Williams & Tracy, Inc 512 NW 12th St. 1701 S. Boston Ave. Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73103 Tulsa, OK 74119 405-232-6357 918-582-8000 [email_address] [email_address]

Notas del editor

  1. Thielenhaus – 1995 OK 5, 890 P.2d 925 – not a prevailing party rule.
  2. Thielenhaus – 1995 OK 5, 890 P.2d 925 – not a prevailing party rule.
  3. Thielenhaus – 1995 OK 5, 890 P.2d 925 – not a prevailing party rule.
  4. Thielenhaus – 1995 OK 5, 890 P.2d 925 – not a prevailing party rule.
  5. Husband had employer testify that he was a key employee, Options treated like deferred compensation in Carpenter. Ettinger 1981 case – options granted after divorce could not be divided. Factors at work – what is the purpose of granting the option – reward for years of service (accrued during marriage) v. incentive to stay with company (must remain employed after marriage to earn reward). Get copy of option plan, stock option agreement, agreement awarding option.
  6. Dad’s income up from 125K per year to 1.3 million.
  7. Foster parents are aunt and uncle Attorney for child suggested making child support payment – parents offered and foster parents declined. Other offers tendered after support order entered.
  8. Foster parents are aunt and uncle Attorney for child suggested making child support payment – parents offered and foster parents declined. Other offers tendered after support order entered.
  9. Trial court found relocation statute unconstitutional. Since reversed on other grounds, supreme court dodged issue. What is the status of Kaiser and 10 O.S. 19 – custodial parent has right to change child’s residence, subject to power of court to restrain parent.
  10. Dad’s income up from 125K per year to 1.3 million.
  11. Foster parents are aunt and uncle Attorney for child suggested making child support payment – parents offered and foster parents declined. Other offers tendered after support order entered.
  12. Dad’s income up from 125K per year to 1.3 million.
  13. Dad’s income up from 125K per year to 1.3 million.
  14. Thielenhaus – 1995 OK 5, 890 P.2d 925 – not a prevailing party rule.