October 2013 presentation on Era of Crisis is NOW (YouTube) - http://bit.ly/Crisis-NOW
The era for crisis is Now. A combination of factors, including concerns for public safety based upon recent tragedies, an enhanced focus on decreasing ER and inpatient utilization and cost savings and an emphasis on trauma informed care are creating a new prioritization of integrated crisis systems. In 2014, National Council will launch a special steering committee and host a crisis track at its Washington DC conference in May.
3. Polling Question #1
Virginia Tech, Columbine, Tucson, Aurora,
Newtown… We should do the following:
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
Double Mental Health System Capacity
Ban Assault Rifles Immediately
Dramatically Expand MH First Aid
Create Robust, Integrated Crisis Systems
All of the Above
None of the Above, as Tragedies Are
Unavoidable
6. CIT Law Enforcement Training
Response to shooting death of person with mental
illness by Memphis police
Sam Cochran and Randy Dupont with NAMI
40 hours mental health and de-escalation
Now in 40 states and 2,000 jurisdictions
7. Joint Effort in St. Louis
Legislative response to shooting death of family
members by person with mental illness
Board of Directors four local CMHCs
9. Statewide Crisis & Access Line
Single Point of Entry concept led to GCAL
Hurricane Katrina in 2005
Scheduling, Dashboards and Analytics
10. Crisis Response Center Tucson
2006 community bond packages $54 million
CPSA and University Physician’s Hospital
Co-located Call Center, Stabilization and more
11. Phoenix’s Full Array of Services
Peer Warm-line, Crisis Line & Mobile Crisis
24/7 Outpatient & Co-located Residential
Detox, Crisis Stabilization & Psych Inpatient
Above, Community Bridges
12.
13.
14. Colorado’s Integrated Vision
Peer Warm Line
Crisis Line
Mobile Crisis Response
24/7 Walk-In
Crisis Stabilization
Crisis Respite
16. Importance of Mental Health in
Public Safety
On gun violence, Americans now
more likely to blame mental
health system over gun laws, a
shift since 2011’s Tucson tragedy.
17. Polling Question #2
Without community based mobile crisis
services law enforcement and ERs will
hospitalize individuals:
A. The Same Amount as if Those Services
Were Available
B. Less Likely to Hospitalize
C. 2x More Likely
D. 3x More Likely
18. Investment in Mental Health
Wellness Act of 2013
“SB 82 [found] that 70% of
people taken to ERs for
psychiatric evaluation can be
stabilized and transferred to a
less intensive level of care. ”
26. Polling Question #3
People have a right to suicide. We should do
everything possible to engage someone at
risk but not invasively intervene if they do
not want our help.
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Don’t Know
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
27. Imminent Risk
NSPL defined “Imminent Risk”:
Staff believe the person’s current risk status/actions could
lead to suicide
Staff sense an obligation/immediate pressure to take urgent
actions
Individual has both a desire and intent to die and has the
capability of carrying through
28. Emergency Intervention
NSPL provided Nine Guidelines for Active Rescue:
Active Engagement
Least Invasive Intervention
Initiation of life-saving
services for attempts in
progress
Supervisory Consultation
Active Rescue
Caller I.D.
Confirmation of Emergency
Services Contact
Procedures for Follow-Up
When Emergency Services
Contact Is Unsuccessful
Third-Party callers
Collaborative Relationships
with Local Emergency/Crisis
Services Provider
29. Engagement & Collaboration
“From the very beginning I felt like she
was an ally... It felt safe to really, really
open up to her because she accepted me
as I was, where I was. She listened to me
and she heard me. . . I felt like she was a
partner, working with me - and it felt
safe…”
30. Polling Question #4
Individuals in crisis often feel out of control
and seclusion and restraint are appropriate
treatment interventions that help reduce
anxiety and provide safety.
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
Strongly Agree
Agree
Don’t Know
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
33. Seclusion & Restraint
In 2000, Charles Curie won the
Harvard Innovations in American
Government Award for a
Pennsylvania state hospital
initiative that viewed seclusion and
restraint as a treatment failure
rather than an acceptable best
practice intervention.
35. No Force First
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Define the use of force and coercion
as a treatment failure
Train staff in effective de-escalation
techniques
Debrief coercion and force and
include the service recipient
Perform critical incident reviews
Track and report all types of forced
interventions and provide feedback to
staff
Use active outreach, engagement and
peer support
Describe relationships as “risk
sharing”
37. Follow-Up Research
Jerome Motto’s “caring letters” found a simple
follow-up letter expressing concern following a
hospital discharge reduced suicide attempts.
Madelyn Gould
Madelyn Gould’s follow-up calls to persons
contacting Lifeline found 54% indicated that
the calls helped significantly with keeping
them from killing themselves.
The research has demonstrated that isolation
and lack of connectedness elevate suicidality
considerably. Knowing that someone cares
helps persons feel less isolated.
45. Contact Us
National Council Crisis Steering Committee Co-Leads
david.covington@crisisaccess-co.com
suzanner@crisisnetwork.org
Social Networking
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwcovington
https://twitter.com/davidwcovington
https://www.facebook.com/david.covington
http://www.youtube.com/davidcovington
crisisaccess.com
Notas del editor
http://www.colorado.gov/cs/Satellite/GovHickenlooper/CBON/1251635156890Gov. John Hickenlooper and Colorado Department of Human Services Executive Director Reggie Bicha today introduced a plan to redesign and strengthen Colorado’s mental health services and support system. The plan is called “Strengthening Colorado’s Mental Health System: A Plan to Safeguard All Coloradans.”“For the past five months, in response to the Aurora shooting, we have been working to expand mental health care and services across Colorado,” Hickenlooper said. “No single plan can guarantee to stop dangerous people from doing harm to themselves or others. But we can help people from falling through the cracks. We believe these policies will reduce the probability of bad things happening to good people.”Five key strategies form the plan:Provide the right services to the right people at the right time.Align three statutes into one new civil commitment law. This alignment protects the civil liberties of people experiencing mental crises or substance abuse emergencies, and clarifies the process and options for providers of mental health and substance abuse services (requires legislative change).Authorize the Colorado State Judicial System to transfer mental health commitment records electronically and directly to the Colorado Bureau of Investigation in real-time so the information is available for firearm purchase background checks conducted by Colorado InstaCheck (requires legislative change).Enhance Colorado’s crisis response system ($10,272,874 budget request).Establish a single statewide mental health crisis hotline.Establish five, 24/7 walk-in crisis stabilization services for urgent mental health care needs.Expand hospital capacity ($2,063,438 budget request).Develop a 20-bed jailed-based restoration program in the Denver area.Enhance community care ($4,793,824 budget request).Develop community residential services for those transitioning from institutional care.Expand case management and wrap-around services for seriously mentally ill people in the communityDevelop two 15-bed Residential Facilities for short-term transition from mental health hospitals to the community.Target housing subsidies to add 107 housing vouchers for individuals with serious mental illness.Build a trauma-informed culture of care ($1,391,865 budget request).Develop peer support specialist positions in the state’s mental health hospitals.Provide de-escalation rooms at each of the state’s mental health hospitals.Develop a consolidated mental health/substance abuse data systemTo fund this plan, the governor is asking the General Assembly to approve $18.5 million in the FY 2013-14 budget.
The answer is E, all of the above. Mental health advocates have called for the first three (see Ron Manderscheid’s letter, for example). F is the wrong answer. Handwringing will no longer cut it. We must create robust, integrated crisis systems, and policy makers are requiring and funding it in increasing numbers.http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/01/07/newtown-shooting-mental-health-reform/1781145/
The answer is D, 3x more likely. Scott (2000) and Hugo et al (2002) alongside data from the BHL Georgia Crisis & Access Line and mobile crisis response services suggest that diversion is 25% away from intrusive and costly higher end services without mobile crisis response, and 75% and higher with those services in place.
The answer is E, strongly disagree. Yes, we should do everything possible to engage someone voluntarily in care through peer supports, respect, collaboration, etc., but at the end of the day, medical and behavioral professionals have legal and ethical obligations to do no harm. We must perform active rescues or other intrusive interventions if health and safety of the person are others are at “imminent risk.”