Good Stuff Happens in 1:1 Meetings: Why you need them and how to do them well
Standard chartered securities_-_equity_research_report
1. l Equity Research l
India I Financials 21 July 2012
India financials
Restructuring norms – negative on profitability; to increase discipline
The new norms for loan restructuring recommended by the RBI Working Group (WG) will
have a negative impact on profitability, but will increase discipline among banks while
restructuring loans, in our view.
We believe these guidelines will be finalized in the current shape without changes before the
end of FY13.
New tighter norms include higher contribution from promoters to ensure their full
commitment, personal guarantee from the promoter which cannot be replaced with a
corporate guarantee, higher provisioning by banks on restructured loans, reducing viability
tenors and changes to the recompense clause.
Impact: If these guidelines are followed, net profit of state banks will likely decline by 6-18%.
For private banks the impact will be much lower at 0.2% to 2%. While the provisioning on
restructured loans has been hiked it still remains substantially lower than NPL provisioning.
Impact analysis
O/S % impact
restructured Loans Incremental (post tax) on FY12 yoy FY12 yoy
Internal Use Only
loans (March restructured 3% provision FY12 net FY12 % impact on EPS growth EPS growth
2012) during FY12 requirement profit reported PAT current BVPS pre impact post impact
Rs bn Rs bn Rs bn Rs bn % %
Allahabad Bank 59.6 44.0 1.8 18.7 6.7% 1.3% 23% 15%
Not For Distribution
BoB 171.4 88.5 5.1 50.1 7.2% 1.4% 10% 2%
BOI 143.7 91.3 4.3 26.8 11.3% 1.5% 3% -8%
Canara 79.0 44.2 2.4 32.8 5.1% 0.8% -24% -28%
OBC 95.1 65.7 2.9 11.4 17.5% 1.8% -35% -46%
PNB 230.6 148.1 6.9 48.8 9.9% 1.8% 10% -1%
SBI 311.6 84.0 9.3 117.1 5.6% 0.8% 42% 34%
Union Bank 79.9 62.3 2.4 17.9 9.4% 1.3% -14% -22%
Total (PSBs) 1,171 628 35 324 7.6% na na na
Axis Bank* 38.3 13.3 1.1 42.4 1.9% 0.3% 24% 22%
HDFC Bank* 7.8 na 0.2 51.7 0.3% 0.1% 30% 30%
ICICI Bank 42.6 37.4 1.3 64.7 1.4% 0.1% 24% 22%
IndusInd* 0.9 na 0.0 8.0 0.2% 0.0% 31% 30%
Yes Bank 2.0 na 0.1 9.8 0.4% 0.1% 32% 31%
Source: Company, * as of June 2012 ** for above calculations we have assumed the incremental charge is provided in one year itself vs two years allowed as per the new norms
Key guidelines
5% provision on restructured loans: The provision requirement on standard restructured
accounts should be increased from the current 2% to 5% in a phased manner over a two-year
period, ie, 3.5% in the first year and 5% in the second year. However, in cases of new
restructuring of standard asset (flow), provision of 5% should be made with immediate effect.
Extant classification for project loans to continue: The extant asset classification benefits
in cases of change of date of commencement of commercial operation (DCCO) of
infrastructure project loans may be allowed to continue for some more time in view of the
uncertainties involved in obtaining clearances from various authorities and the importance of
the sector in national growth and development.
Mahrukh Adajania Rounak Agarwal
Mahrukh.Adajania@sc.com Rounak.Agarwal@sc.com
+91 22 4205 5903 +91 22 4205 5933
Important disclosures can be found in the Disclosures Appendix
PNB IN
All rights reserved. Standard Chartered Bank 2012
Rs853.00
Rs1,041.00 http://research.standardchartered.com
2. India financials l 21 July 2012
Tighten norms for upgrading restructured loans where there are multiple credit
facilities restructured: Accounts classified as NPAs upon restructuring are currently eligible
for up-gradation to the 'standard' category after observation of 'satisfactory performance'
during the 'specified period'. The specified period has been defined as a period of one year
from the date when the first payment of interest or instalment of principal falls due under the
terms of restructuring package. The WG has recommended that the „specified period‟ should
be redefined in cases of restructuring with multiple credit facilities as „one year from the
commencement of the first payment of interest or principal, whichever is later, on the credit
facility with longest period of moratorium.
Conversion of debt into preference shares should be done only as a last resort. Also,
conversion of debt into equity/preference shares should be restricted to a cap (say 10% of the
restructured debt). Further, conversion of debt into equity should be done only in the case of
listed companies.
Promoter contribution towards sacrifice to increase to 15% from current 10%: A higher
amount of promoters‟ sacrifice in cases of restructuring of large exposures under CDR
mechanism needs to be considered. Further, the promoters‟ contribution should be prescribed
at a minimum of 15% of the diminution in fair value of the restructured account or 2% of the
restructured debt, whichever is higher.
Personal guarantee of promoter now mandatory and cannot be replaced with corporate
guarantee: As stipulating personal guarantee will ensure promoters‟ “skin in the game” or
commitment to the restructuring package, obtaining the personal guarantee of promoters be
made a mandatory requirement in all cases of restructuring, ie, even if the restructuring is
necessitated on account of external factors pertaining to the economy and industry. Further,
corporate guarantee should not be considered as a substitute for the promoters‟ personal
guarantee.
Viability time frame to be tightened to ensure that no undue time benefit is granted to
restructured companies: The WG also felt that the prescribed time span of seven years for
non-infrastructure borrowal accounts and ten years for infrastructure accounts for becoming
viable on restructuring was too long and banks should take it as an outer limit. The WG,
therefore, recommended that, in times when there is no general downturn in the economy, the
viability time span should not be more than five years in non-infrastructure cases and not more
than eight years in infrastructure cases.
Standard restructured loans that perform well for a year need not be shown as
restructured all through their life: In terms of present guidelines, banks are required to
disclose annually all accounts restructured on their books on a cumulative basis even though
many of them would have subsequently shown satisfactory performance over a sufficiently
long period. The WG has, therefore, recommended that once the higher provisions and risk
weights (if applicable) on restructured advances (classified as standard either ab initio or on
upgradation from NPA category) revert back to the normal level on account of satisfactory
performance during the prescribed period, such advances should no longer be required to be
disclosed by banks as restructured accounts in the “Notes on Accounts” in their Annual
Balance Sheets.
While banks like ICICI Bank already follow this norm, for most other banks this norm
will help lower the stock of restructured loans.
l Equity Research l 2
3. India financials l 21 July 2012
Prompt corrective action necessary: The WG observed that there were cases which were
found to be viable before restructuring but the assumptions leading to viability did not
materialize in due course of time. There were also cases where the approved restructuring
package could not be implemented satisfactorily due to external reasons or due to promoters‟
non-adherence to the terms and conditions. The WG recommended that in such cases, banks
should be advised to assess the situation early and use the exit options with a view to
minimize the losses. The WG also recommended that the terms and conditions of
restructuring should inherently contain the principle of „carrot and stick‟, ie, while restructuring
being an incentive for viable accounts, it should also have disincentives for non-adherence to
the terms of restructuring and under-performance.
Some relaxation in recompense: Due to the current guidelines issued by CDR Cell that
recompense be calculated on compounding basis and that 100% of recompense so calculated
is payable, exit of companies from the CDR system was not happening. Therefore, the WG
recommended that CDR Standing Forum/Core Group may take a view as to whether their
clause on „recompense‟ may be made somewhat flexible in order to facilitate the exit of the
borrowers from the CDR Cell. However, it also recommended that in any case 75% of the
amount of recompense calculated should be recovered from the borrowers and in cases of
restructuring where a facility has been granted below base rate, 100% of the recompense
amount should be recovered. The WG also recommended that the present recommendatory
nature of „recompense‟ clause should be made mandatory even in cases of non-CDR
restructurings.
l Equity Research l 3
4. India financials l 21 July 2012
Disclosures appendix
The information and opinions in this report were prepared by Standard Chartered Bank (Hong Kong) Limited, Standard
Chartered Bank Singapore Branch, Standard Chartered Securities (India) Limited, Standard Chartered Securities Korea
Limited and/or one or more of its affiliates (together with its group of companies, ”SCB”) and the research analyst(s) named in
this report. THIS RESEARCH HAS NOT BEEN PRODUCED IN THE UNITED STATES.
Analyst Certification Disclosure: The research analyst or analysts responsible for the content of this research report certify
that: (1) the views expressed and attributed to the research analyst or analysts in the research report accurately reflect their
personal opinion(s) about the subject securities and issuers and/or other subject matter as appropriate; and (2) no part of his
or her compensation was, is or will be directly or indirectly related to the specific recommendations or views contained in this
research report. On a general basis, the efficacy of recommendations is a factor in the performance appraisals of analysts.
Where “disclosure date” appears below, this means the day prior to the report date. All share prices quoted are the closing
price for the business day prior to the date of the report, unless otherwise stated.
Recommendation Distribution and Investment Banking Relationships
% of companies assigned this rating
% of covered companies with which SCB has provided investment
currently assigned this rating banking services over the past 12 months
OUTPERFORM 61.1% 11.0%
IN-LINE 30.7% 12.3%
UNDERPERFORM 8.2% 8.3%
As of 30 June 2012
Research Recommendation
Terminology Definitions
The total return on the security is expected to outperform the relevant market index by 5% or more
OUTPERFORM (OP)
over the next 12 months
The total return on the security is not expected to outperform or underperform the relevant market
IN-LINE (IL)
index by 5% or more over the next 12 months
The total return on the security is expected to underperform the relevant market index by 5% or
UNDERPERFORM (UP)
more over the next 12 months
SCB uses an investment horizon of 12 months for its price targets.
Additional information, including disclosures, with respect to any securities referred to herein will be available upon
request. Requests should be sent to scer@sc.com.
Global Disclaimer: Standard Chartered Bank and/or its affiliates ("SCB”) makes no representation or warranty of any kind,
express, implied or statutory regarding this document or any information contained or referred to in the document. The
information in this document is provided for information purposes only. It does not constitute any offer, recommendation or
solicitation to any person to enter into any transaction or adopt any hedging, trading or investment strategy, nor does it
constitute any prediction of likely future movements in rates or prices or represent that any such future movements will not
exceed those shown in any illustration. The stated price of the securities mentioned herein, if any, is as of the date indicated
and is not any representation that any transaction can be effected at this price. While all reasonable care has been taken in
preparing this document, no responsibility or liability is accepted for errors of fact or for any opinion expressed herein. The
contents of this document may not be suitable for all investors as it has not been prepared with regard to the specific
investment objectives or financial situation of any particular person. Any investments discussed may not be suitable for all
investors. Users of this document should seek professional advice regarding the appropriateness of investing in any
securities, financial instruments or investment strategies referred to in this document and should understand that statements
regarding future prospects may not be realised. Opinions, forecasts, assumptions, estimates, derived valuations, projections,
and price target(s), if any, contained in this document are as of the date indicated and are subject to change at any time
without prior notice. Our recommendations are under constant review. The value and income of any of the securities or
financial instruments mentioned in this document can fall as well as rise and an investor may get back less than invested.
Future returns are not guaranteed, and a loss of original capital may be incurred. Foreign-currency denominated securities
and financial instruments are subject to fluctuation in exchange rates that could have a positive or adverse effect on the
value, price or income of such securities and financial instruments. Past performance is not indicative of comparable future
results and no representation or warranty is made regarding future performance. While we endeavour to update on a
reasonable basis the information and opinions contained herein, there may be regulatory, compliance or other reasons that
prevent us from doing so. Accordingly, information may be available to us which is not reflected in this material, and we may
have acted upon or used the information prior to or immediately following its publication. SCB is not a legal or tax adviser,
and is not purporting to provide legal or tax advice. Independent legal and/or tax advice should be sought for any queries
relating to the legal or tax implications of any investment. SCB, and/or a connected company, may have a position in any of
the securities, instruments or currencies mentioned in this document. SCB and/or any member of the SCB group of
companies or its respective officers, directors, employee benefit programmes or employees, including persons involved in the
preparation or issuance of this document may at any time, to the extent permitted by applicable law and/or regulation, be long
or short any securities or financial instruments referred to in this document and on the website or have a material interest in
any such securities or related investment, or may be the only market maker in relation to such investments, or provide, or
have provided advice, investment banking or other services, to issuers of such investments. SCB has in place policies and
procedures and physical information walls between its Research Department and differing public and private business
functions to help ensure confidential information, including „inside‟ information is not disclosed unless in line with its policies
and procedures and the rules of its regulators. Data, opinions and other information appearing herein may have been
obtained from public sources. SCB makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of such
information obtained from public sources. You are advised to make your own independent judgment (with the advice of your
professional advisers as necessary) with respect to any matter contained herein and not rely on this document as the basis
for making any trading, hedging or investment decision. SCB accepts no liability and will not be liable for any loss or damage
arising directly or indirectly (including special, incidental, consequential, punitive or exemplary damages) from use of this
l Equity Research l 4