SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 29
Chapter 15
       Death:
       The Ultimate Sanction



McGraw-Hill/Irwin              © 2013 McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights Reserved.
A Brief History of Capital
               Punishment
   Throughout history, capital punishment has
    commonly been used as a penalty for criminal
    behavior.
   Until the Age of Enlightenment in the18th
    century, death was meted out for crimes as
    minor as forgery or the theft of a chicken.
   The Enlightenment led to new theories on crime
    and punishment. One put forth the notion that
    punishment ought to fit the particular crime for
    which it is applied.

                                                   15-2
A Brief History of Capital
         Punishment – Continued
   Some states banned or limited capital
    punishment in the early 20th century.
   U.S. v. Jackson (1968) – held that the provision
    of the federal kidnapping statute that required
    the death penalty to be imposed only upon the
    recommendation by a jury was unconstitutional.
   Witherspoon v. Illinois (1968) – a potential juror’s
    mere reservations about the death penalty were
    insufficient to prevent that person from serving
    on the jury in a death penalty case.

                                                      15-3
A Brief History of Capital
         Punishment – Continued
   Furman v. Georgia (1972) – declared the death
    penalty, as it was applied, was unconstitutional
      As a result the court voided 40 death penalty

       statutes
   Gregg v. Georgia (1976) – upheld the guided
    discretionary capital statutes
      Created a bifurcated trial process




                                                   15-4
Capital Punishment Worldwide

As of March of 2010, the death penalty had been
abolished in law or practice in 139 countries. 58
countries still use the death penalty.




                                               15-5
Capital Punishment Worldwide
   In 2010, Amnesty International
    documented 527 executions in 23
    countries, but the total did not include
    figures from China, which executes more
    people than the rest of the world
    combined. The five countries that reported
    the most executions in 2009 were Iran
    (252), North Korea (60), Yemen (53),
    United States (46), and Saudi Arabia (27).
                                            15-6
Capital Punishment in the U.S.
   Today, 34 states, the military, and the federal
    government allow capital punishment.
   Sixteen states do not allow capital punishment.
   The first person to be executed in the U.S. after
    the moratorium ended on the death penalty was
    Gary Gilmore by a Utah firing squad on January
    17, 1977.




                                                    15-7
Federal Death Penalty
   The U.S. Constitution does not mention the
    death penalty, but it does permit depriving
    citizens of life after giving due process.
   The first federal execution was of Thomas Bird
    on June 25, 1790 when he was hanged in Maine
    for the crime of murder.
   Since 1790, the federal government has
    executed 336 men and 4 women.
       39% were white; 35% were black; 19% were Native
        American; and 7% were Hispanic or other

                                                          15-8
Federal Death Penalty Act and the
            Right to Counsel
   A minimum of two lawyers should be appointed
    to represent federal capital defendants.
   At least one of the two lawyers must have
    experience in capital work.
   The federal court must consider the Federal
    Public Defender’s recommendation regarding
    which counsel are qualified for appointment in
    capital cases.


                                                 15-9
Federal Death Row
 United States Penitentiary, Terre Haute, Indiana
    Special Confinement Unit (SCU)

 On March 10, 2011, 60 people were on federal

  death row.
 The last three federal executions were:

 Timothy McVeigh, executed June 11, 2001.

• Juan Raul Garza, executed June 19, 2001 .
• Louis Jones Jr., executed March 18, 2003.


                                                15-10
•Executions
    Since the death penalty began again in
    1977, 1,242 people have been executed.
    Thirty-eight percent of the executions have
    taken place in Texas. The South leads the
    U.S. in executions.




                                                  15-11
Characteristics of
          Death Row Inmates
    Today, 3,261 people were under sentence of
    death in the United States. Most are in
    California (697), Florida (398), and Texas
    (337). In 2008, there were 111 death
    sentences issued, the fewest since 1976,
    when the Supreme Court reinstated the death
    penalty.




                                             15-12
Methods of Execution
   Lethal injection
       Predominant method in U.S
       Used in 37 states
       First adopted in 1977 by Oklahoma
   Electrocution
   Lethal gas
   Hanging
   Firing squad
   The Federal Government authorizes both lethal
    injection or whichever method is in use in the
    convicting state.
                                                 15-13
Death Row
   A prison area housing inmates who have been
    sentenced to death
       A prison within a prison
   All but two death penalty states (Missouri and
    Tennessee) segregate death row inmates from
    the general prison population
   Most death row inmates spend 22 to 23 hours
    per day locked down in a five-by-eight- or six-by-
    nine-foot cell

                                                   15-14
Public Opinion and Death
   Public still favors capital punishment.
   Support for the death penalty drops when other
    punishment options, such as life without the
    possibility of parole are given.
   People with higher incomes are more likely to
    support capital punishment than people with
    lower incomes.




                                                 15-15
Continued
   According to the Gallup Poll, public
    support for capital punishment in the
    United States was at its lowest in 1966
    when only 42 percent of Americans
    supported it. It reached its highest level
    (80 percent) in 1994.




                                                 15-16
Politics and Death
 In January 2003, Illinois Governor George
  Ryan commuted 164 death sentences to life
  in prison, commuted three other death row
  inmates’ sentences to 40 years in prison, and
  pardoned four other death row inmates
  because of mounting evidence that the death
  penalty was not being applied fairly in Illinois.




                                                 15-17
Courts and the Death Penalty
     Furman v. Georgia (1972)
   The death penalty, as imposed and carried out
    under the laws of Georgia, was cruel and
    unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth
    and Fourteenth Amendments
   Voided all death penalty statutes because they
    allowed arbitrary and discriminatory imposition of
    the death sentence
   The states responded by rewriting the statutes -
    some devised mandatory death penalties for
    certain crimes, while others opted for guided
    discretion that set standards to guide judges and
    juries
                                                   15-18
Courts and the Death Penalty
        Mandatory Death Penalty
   A death sentence that the legislature has
    required to be imposed upon people convicted
    of certain offenses.
   Woodson v. North Carolina and Roberts v.
    Louisiana (1976) rejected mandatory death
    penalty statutes.




                                                   15-19
Courts and the Death Penalty
      Gregg v. Georgia (1976)
   Approved guided discretion statutes
   Mandated a bifurcated trial process
     The first part is the guilt phase, in which the
      jury decides the issue of guilt
     The second part is the penalty phase, in
      which the prosecution presents aggravating
      factors and the defense present mitigating
      factors and a jury decides which punishment
      to impose
   Approved automatic appellate review
                                                   15-20
Key Terminology
   Guided discretion: decision making bounded
    by general guidelines, rules, or laws
   Bifurcated trial : two separated hearings for
    different issues in a trial, one for guilt and the
    other for punishment
   Mitigating circumstances : factors that,
    although not justifying or excusing an action,
    may reduce the culpability of the offender
   Aggravating circumstances : factors that
    may increase the culpability of the offender

                                                    15-21
Appealing Death
   The average time between imposition of a death
    sentence and execution of the offender is 11
    years
   Serious error – error that substantially
    undermines the reliability of the guilt finding or
    death sentence imposed at trial
   Nationally, for every 100 death sentences
    imposed, 41 were turned back at the trial and
    direct review phase because of serious error

                                                    15-22
Appealing Death – Continued
   Death penalty cases may pass through as
    many as 10 courts across three stages:
    trial and direct review, state postconviction
    appeals, and federal habeas corpus
    appeals




                                               15-23
Appealing Death – Continued
   Second stage reviews (state post-
    conviction appeals) detect serious error in
    10 percent of the capital cases reviewed

   Despite extensive state-level appellate
    review, federal courts still find serious
    error in 40 percent of the capital cases
    they review



                                                15-24
The Liebman Study
   The overall rate of prejudicial error in the U.S.
    capital punishment system is 68%
   Serious flaws existed in more than two out of
    three capital cases reviewed by the courts
   The error rate in some states exceeded 75%
   Almost 1,000 retried cases ended in sentences
    less than death
   Retrials in 87 cases ended in verdicts of not
    guilty

                                                    15-25
Juveniles and the Death Penalty
   The first juvenile executed was Thomas
    Graunger in 1642 when he was hanged in
    Massachusetts for buggery. He was sixteen.
   The U.S. has put to death 365 people for
    offenses they committed as children.
      From 1976 to March 2, 2005, 22 people were
       executed for crimes they committed as
       juveniles.




                                               15-26
Juveniles and the Death Penalty
   In Thompson v. Oklahoma (1988), the
    Court held that it is unconstitutional to
    execute a 15-year-old.
   In Roper v. Simmons (2005) the Court
    held that it is unconstitutional to execute
    anyone for a crime they committed before
    turning age 18.



                                             15-27
Juveniles and the Death Penalty
   Justices cited scientific literature from the
    American Academy of Child and Adolescent
    Psychiatry, the American Medical Association,
    and the American Psychological Association
    showing that adolescents lack mature judgment,
    are less aware of the consequences of their
    decisions and actions, are more vulnerable than
    adults to peer pressure, and have a greater
    tendency toward impulsiveness and lesser
    reasoning skills, regardless of how big they are
    or how tough they talk
                                                  15-28
The Mentally Retarded and Death
   Atkins v. Virginia (2002) held the execution of
    the mentally retarded to be a violation of the
    Eighth Amendment ban against cruel and
    unusual punishment.
       The Court cited the development of a national
        consensus against such executions.
   Atkins also left it to the states to define mental
    retardation.



                                                         15-29

More Related Content

What's hot

Ppt chapter 14
Ppt chapter 14Ppt chapter 14
Ppt chapter 14
difordham
 
Actus reus new
Actus reus newActus reus new
Actus reus new
957755
 
Ch 15 Search and Seizure
Ch 15 Search and SeizureCh 15 Search and Seizure
Ch 15 Search and Seizure
rharrisonaz
 

What's hot (20)

O. XXXVII OF CPC,1908 [SUMMARY PROCEDURE]
O. XXXVII OF CPC,1908 [SUMMARY PROCEDURE]O. XXXVII OF CPC,1908 [SUMMARY PROCEDURE]
O. XXXVII OF CPC,1908 [SUMMARY PROCEDURE]
 
Capital punishment
Capital punishment Capital punishment
Capital punishment
 
Punishment
PunishmentPunishment
Punishment
 
Ppt chapter 14
Ppt chapter 14Ppt chapter 14
Ppt chapter 14
 
Actus reus new
Actus reus newActus reus new
Actus reus new
 
Code of civil procedure 1908 incidental proceedings
Code of civil procedure 1908 incidental proceedingsCode of civil procedure 1908 incidental proceedings
Code of civil procedure 1908 incidental proceedings
 
Psychiatric illness tort law
Psychiatric illness tort lawPsychiatric illness tort law
Psychiatric illness tort law
 
Ch 15 Search and Seizure
Ch 15 Search and SeizureCh 15 Search and Seizure
Ch 15 Search and Seizure
 
Offences affecting the human body
Offences affecting the human bodyOffences affecting the human body
Offences affecting the human body
 
Theories of Punishment
Theories of PunishmentTheories of Punishment
Theories of Punishment
 
Culpable Homicide VS Murder
Culpable Homicide VS MurderCulpable Homicide VS Murder
Culpable Homicide VS Murder
 
Plea bargaining
Plea bargainingPlea bargaining
Plea bargaining
 
(10) stolen property
(10) stolen property(10) stolen property
(10) stolen property
 
Parole: Definition, Objectives, Conditions and Social Implication
Parole: Definition, Objectives, Conditions and Social ImplicationParole: Definition, Objectives, Conditions and Social Implication
Parole: Definition, Objectives, Conditions and Social Implication
 
Criminal Law - Difference between criminal misappropriation and theft
Criminal Law - Difference between criminal misappropriation and theftCriminal Law - Difference between criminal misappropriation and theft
Criminal Law - Difference between criminal misappropriation and theft
 
Capital punishment
Capital punishmentCapital punishment
Capital punishment
 
Victimology-ppt.ppt
Victimology-ppt.pptVictimology-ppt.ppt
Victimology-ppt.ppt
 
security for keeping the peace and for good behaviour
 security for keeping the peace and for good behaviour security for keeping the peace and for good behaviour
security for keeping the peace and for good behaviour
 
Administrative Law
Administrative Law Administrative Law
Administrative Law
 
Mens Rea
Mens ReaMens Rea
Mens Rea
 

Viewers also liked (20)

Ppt chapter 16
Ppt chapter 16Ppt chapter 16
Ppt chapter 16
 
Criminal Justice Today - Chap 15
Criminal Justice Today - Chap 15Criminal Justice Today - Chap 15
Criminal Justice Today - Chap 15
 
Ppt chapter 11
Ppt chapter 11Ppt chapter 11
Ppt chapter 11
 
Sentencing notes
Sentencing notesSentencing notes
Sentencing notes
 
Ppt chapter 3
Ppt chapter 3Ppt chapter 3
Ppt chapter 3
 
Ppt chapter 2
Ppt chapter 2Ppt chapter 2
Ppt chapter 2
 
Ppt chapter 9
Ppt chapter 9Ppt chapter 9
Ppt chapter 9
 
Schm5e ppt ch17
Schm5e ppt ch17Schm5e ppt ch17
Schm5e ppt ch17
 
Ppt chapter 8
Ppt chapter 8Ppt chapter 8
Ppt chapter 8
 
Ppt chapter 10
Ppt chapter 10Ppt chapter 10
Ppt chapter 10
 
Ppt chapter 13
Ppt chapter 13Ppt chapter 13
Ppt chapter 13
 
Ppt chapter 12
Ppt chapter 12Ppt chapter 12
Ppt chapter 12
 
Ppt chapter 7
Ppt chapter 7Ppt chapter 7
Ppt chapter 7
 
Sentencing
SentencingSentencing
Sentencing
 
Sentencing
SentencingSentencing
Sentencing
 
Adult Sentencing
Adult Sentencing Adult Sentencing
Adult Sentencing
 
Aims Of Sentencing
Aims Of SentencingAims Of Sentencing
Aims Of Sentencing
 
Aims and Factors of Sentencing
Aims and Factors of SentencingAims and Factors of Sentencing
Aims and Factors of Sentencing
 
Bail and PreTrial
Bail and PreTrialBail and PreTrial
Bail and PreTrial
 
Stop and Search
Stop and SearchStop and Search
Stop and Search
 

Similar to Ppt chapter 15

Capital punishment
Capital punishmentCapital punishment
Capital punishment
Zeno Ziemke
 
AGAINST THE DEATH PENALTYStephen B. BrightAttorney Stephen B. Br.pdf
AGAINST THE DEATH PENALTYStephen B. BrightAttorney Stephen B. Br.pdfAGAINST THE DEATH PENALTYStephen B. BrightAttorney Stephen B. Br.pdf
AGAINST THE DEATH PENALTYStephen B. BrightAttorney Stephen B. Br.pdf
apexcomputer54
 
Capital Punishment
Capital PunishmentCapital Punishment
Capital Punishment
MrG
 
Eng 202 Final research paper
Eng 202 Final research paperEng 202 Final research paper
Eng 202 Final research paper
Lauren Brady
 
Running Head DEATH PENALTY1 DEATH PENALTY8.docx
Running Head DEATH PENALTY1 DEATH PENALTY8.docxRunning Head DEATH PENALTY1 DEATH PENALTY8.docx
Running Head DEATH PENALTY1 DEATH PENALTY8.docx
todd271
 
CRIJ4385_Death Penalty_F23.pptx
CRIJ4385_Death Penalty_F23.pptxCRIJ4385_Death Penalty_F23.pptx
CRIJ4385_Death Penalty_F23.pptx
yvettemm100
 
Moral problems capital punishment
Moral problems capital punishmentMoral problems capital punishment
Moral problems capital punishment
babygal000
 
Capital Punishment5Capital Punishment.docx
Capital Punishment5Capital Punishment.docxCapital Punishment5Capital Punishment.docx
Capital Punishment5Capital Punishment.docx
humphrieskalyn
 
Instructing on DeathPsychologists, Juries, and JudgesSha.docx
Instructing on DeathPsychologists, Juries, and JudgesSha.docxInstructing on DeathPsychologists, Juries, and JudgesSha.docx
Instructing on DeathPsychologists, Juries, and JudgesSha.docx
dirkrplav
 
ASSIGNMENTSPersuasive Speech written outPersuasive speech o.docx
ASSIGNMENTSPersuasive Speech written outPersuasive speech o.docxASSIGNMENTSPersuasive Speech written outPersuasive speech o.docx
ASSIGNMENTSPersuasive Speech written outPersuasive speech o.docx
rock73
 
Civil libertiesnew
Civil libertiesnewCivil libertiesnew
Civil libertiesnew
guest69d991
 
Civil Liberties & Rights
Civil Liberties & RightsCivil Liberties & Rights
Civil Liberties & Rights
jonathanmpowell
 

Similar to Ppt chapter 15 (20)

Khadija Jones - Death Penalty Thesis Presentation
Khadija Jones - Death Penalty Thesis PresentationKhadija Jones - Death Penalty Thesis Presentation
Khadija Jones - Death Penalty Thesis Presentation
 
Ch 6 Homicide
Ch 6 HomicideCh 6 Homicide
Ch 6 Homicide
 
Презентація а м.pptx
Презентація а м.pptxПрезентація а м.pptx
Презентація а м.pptx
 
Capital punishment
Capital punishmentCapital punishment
Capital punishment
 
AGAINST THE DEATH PENALTYStephen B. BrightAttorney Stephen B. Br.pdf
AGAINST THE DEATH PENALTYStephen B. BrightAttorney Stephen B. Br.pdfAGAINST THE DEATH PENALTYStephen B. BrightAttorney Stephen B. Br.pdf
AGAINST THE DEATH PENALTYStephen B. BrightAttorney Stephen B. Br.pdf
 
research paper
research paperresearch paper
research paper
 
Capital Punishment
Capital PunishmentCapital Punishment
Capital Punishment
 
Eng 202 Final research paper
Eng 202 Final research paperEng 202 Final research paper
Eng 202 Final research paper
 
Furman at-40
Furman at-40Furman at-40
Furman at-40
 
Death penalty
Death penaltyDeath penalty
Death penalty
 
Running Head DEATH PENALTY1 DEATH PENALTY8.docx
Running Head DEATH PENALTY1 DEATH PENALTY8.docxRunning Head DEATH PENALTY1 DEATH PENALTY8.docx
Running Head DEATH PENALTY1 DEATH PENALTY8.docx
 
CRIJ4385_Death Penalty_F23.pptx
CRIJ4385_Death Penalty_F23.pptxCRIJ4385_Death Penalty_F23.pptx
CRIJ4385_Death Penalty_F23.pptx
 
Moral problems capital punishment
Moral problems capital punishmentMoral problems capital punishment
Moral problems capital punishment
 
Capital Punishment5Capital Punishment.docx
Capital Punishment5Capital Punishment.docxCapital Punishment5Capital Punishment.docx
Capital Punishment5Capital Punishment.docx
 
Did crime punishment 2011
Did crime punishment 2011Did crime punishment 2011
Did crime punishment 2011
 
Capital Punishment Essay Conclusion
Capital Punishment Essay ConclusionCapital Punishment Essay Conclusion
Capital Punishment Essay Conclusion
 
Instructing on DeathPsychologists, Juries, and JudgesSha.docx
Instructing on DeathPsychologists, Juries, and JudgesSha.docxInstructing on DeathPsychologists, Juries, and JudgesSha.docx
Instructing on DeathPsychologists, Juries, and JudgesSha.docx
 
ASSIGNMENTSPersuasive Speech written outPersuasive speech o.docx
ASSIGNMENTSPersuasive Speech written outPersuasive speech o.docxASSIGNMENTSPersuasive Speech written outPersuasive speech o.docx
ASSIGNMENTSPersuasive Speech written outPersuasive speech o.docx
 
Civil libertiesnew
Civil libertiesnewCivil libertiesnew
Civil libertiesnew
 
Civil Liberties & Rights
Civil Liberties & RightsCivil Liberties & Rights
Civil Liberties & Rights
 

More from difordham

Ppt chapter 6
Ppt chapter 6Ppt chapter 6
Ppt chapter 6
difordham
 
Ppt chapter 5
Ppt chapter 5Ppt chapter 5
Ppt chapter 5
difordham
 
Ppt chapter 4
Ppt chapter 4Ppt chapter 4
Ppt chapter 4
difordham
 
Ppt chapter 1
Ppt chapter 1Ppt chapter 1
Ppt chapter 1
difordham
 
Ch 12 separation agreements 2ed
Ch 12 separation agreements 2edCh 12 separation agreements 2ed
Ch 12 separation agreements 2ed
difordham
 
Ch 14 adoption 2ed
Ch 14 adoption 2edCh 14 adoption 2ed
Ch 14 adoption 2ed
difordham
 
Ch 13 family violence
Ch 13 family violenceCh 13 family violence
Ch 13 family violence
difordham
 
Ch 11 property division 2ed
Ch 11 property division 2edCh 11 property division 2ed
Ch 11 property division 2ed
difordham
 
Juvenile corrections pp week 16
Juvenile corrections pp week 16Juvenile corrections pp week 16
Juvenile corrections pp week 16
difordham
 
Juvenile corrections pp week 15
Juvenile corrections pp week 15Juvenile corrections pp week 15
Juvenile corrections pp week 15
difordham
 
Juvenile corrections pp week 14
Juvenile corrections pp week 14Juvenile corrections pp week 14
Juvenile corrections pp week 14
difordham
 
Juvenile corrections pp week 13
Juvenile corrections pp week 13Juvenile corrections pp week 13
Juvenile corrections pp week 13
difordham
 
Juvenile corrections pp week 12
Juvenile corrections pp week  12Juvenile corrections pp week  12
Juvenile corrections pp week 12
difordham
 
Juvenile corrections pp week 11
Juvenile corrections pp week 11Juvenile corrections pp week 11
Juvenile corrections pp week 11
difordham
 
Juvenile corrections pp week 10
Juvenile corrections pp week 10Juvenile corrections pp week 10
Juvenile corrections pp week 10
difordham
 
Juvenile corrections pp week 9
Juvenile corrections pp week 9Juvenile corrections pp week 9
Juvenile corrections pp week 9
difordham
 
Juvenile corrections pp week 8
Juvenile corrections pp week 8Juvenile corrections pp week 8
Juvenile corrections pp week 8
difordham
 
Juvenile corrections pp week 7
Juvenile corrections pp week 7Juvenile corrections pp week 7
Juvenile corrections pp week 7
difordham
 

More from difordham (18)

Ppt chapter 6
Ppt chapter 6Ppt chapter 6
Ppt chapter 6
 
Ppt chapter 5
Ppt chapter 5Ppt chapter 5
Ppt chapter 5
 
Ppt chapter 4
Ppt chapter 4Ppt chapter 4
Ppt chapter 4
 
Ppt chapter 1
Ppt chapter 1Ppt chapter 1
Ppt chapter 1
 
Ch 12 separation agreements 2ed
Ch 12 separation agreements 2edCh 12 separation agreements 2ed
Ch 12 separation agreements 2ed
 
Ch 14 adoption 2ed
Ch 14 adoption 2edCh 14 adoption 2ed
Ch 14 adoption 2ed
 
Ch 13 family violence
Ch 13 family violenceCh 13 family violence
Ch 13 family violence
 
Ch 11 property division 2ed
Ch 11 property division 2edCh 11 property division 2ed
Ch 11 property division 2ed
 
Juvenile corrections pp week 16
Juvenile corrections pp week 16Juvenile corrections pp week 16
Juvenile corrections pp week 16
 
Juvenile corrections pp week 15
Juvenile corrections pp week 15Juvenile corrections pp week 15
Juvenile corrections pp week 15
 
Juvenile corrections pp week 14
Juvenile corrections pp week 14Juvenile corrections pp week 14
Juvenile corrections pp week 14
 
Juvenile corrections pp week 13
Juvenile corrections pp week 13Juvenile corrections pp week 13
Juvenile corrections pp week 13
 
Juvenile corrections pp week 12
Juvenile corrections pp week  12Juvenile corrections pp week  12
Juvenile corrections pp week 12
 
Juvenile corrections pp week 11
Juvenile corrections pp week 11Juvenile corrections pp week 11
Juvenile corrections pp week 11
 
Juvenile corrections pp week 10
Juvenile corrections pp week 10Juvenile corrections pp week 10
Juvenile corrections pp week 10
 
Juvenile corrections pp week 9
Juvenile corrections pp week 9Juvenile corrections pp week 9
Juvenile corrections pp week 9
 
Juvenile corrections pp week 8
Juvenile corrections pp week 8Juvenile corrections pp week 8
Juvenile corrections pp week 8
 
Juvenile corrections pp week 7
Juvenile corrections pp week 7Juvenile corrections pp week 7
Juvenile corrections pp week 7
 

Ppt chapter 15

  • 1. Chapter 15 Death: The Ultimate Sanction McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2013 McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights Reserved.
  • 2. A Brief History of Capital Punishment  Throughout history, capital punishment has commonly been used as a penalty for criminal behavior.  Until the Age of Enlightenment in the18th century, death was meted out for crimes as minor as forgery or the theft of a chicken.  The Enlightenment led to new theories on crime and punishment. One put forth the notion that punishment ought to fit the particular crime for which it is applied. 15-2
  • 3. A Brief History of Capital Punishment – Continued  Some states banned or limited capital punishment in the early 20th century.  U.S. v. Jackson (1968) – held that the provision of the federal kidnapping statute that required the death penalty to be imposed only upon the recommendation by a jury was unconstitutional.  Witherspoon v. Illinois (1968) – a potential juror’s mere reservations about the death penalty were insufficient to prevent that person from serving on the jury in a death penalty case. 15-3
  • 4. A Brief History of Capital Punishment – Continued  Furman v. Georgia (1972) – declared the death penalty, as it was applied, was unconstitutional  As a result the court voided 40 death penalty statutes  Gregg v. Georgia (1976) – upheld the guided discretionary capital statutes  Created a bifurcated trial process 15-4
  • 5. Capital Punishment Worldwide As of March of 2010, the death penalty had been abolished in law or practice in 139 countries. 58 countries still use the death penalty. 15-5
  • 6. Capital Punishment Worldwide  In 2010, Amnesty International documented 527 executions in 23 countries, but the total did not include figures from China, which executes more people than the rest of the world combined. The five countries that reported the most executions in 2009 were Iran (252), North Korea (60), Yemen (53), United States (46), and Saudi Arabia (27). 15-6
  • 7. Capital Punishment in the U.S.  Today, 34 states, the military, and the federal government allow capital punishment.  Sixteen states do not allow capital punishment.  The first person to be executed in the U.S. after the moratorium ended on the death penalty was Gary Gilmore by a Utah firing squad on January 17, 1977. 15-7
  • 8. Federal Death Penalty  The U.S. Constitution does not mention the death penalty, but it does permit depriving citizens of life after giving due process.  The first federal execution was of Thomas Bird on June 25, 1790 when he was hanged in Maine for the crime of murder.  Since 1790, the federal government has executed 336 men and 4 women.  39% were white; 35% were black; 19% were Native American; and 7% were Hispanic or other 15-8
  • 9. Federal Death Penalty Act and the Right to Counsel  A minimum of two lawyers should be appointed to represent federal capital defendants.  At least one of the two lawyers must have experience in capital work.  The federal court must consider the Federal Public Defender’s recommendation regarding which counsel are qualified for appointment in capital cases. 15-9
  • 10. Federal Death Row  United States Penitentiary, Terre Haute, Indiana  Special Confinement Unit (SCU)  On March 10, 2011, 60 people were on federal death row.  The last three federal executions were:  Timothy McVeigh, executed June 11, 2001. • Juan Raul Garza, executed June 19, 2001 . • Louis Jones Jr., executed March 18, 2003. 15-10
  • 11. •Executions  Since the death penalty began again in 1977, 1,242 people have been executed. Thirty-eight percent of the executions have taken place in Texas. The South leads the U.S. in executions. 15-11
  • 12. Characteristics of Death Row Inmates  Today, 3,261 people were under sentence of death in the United States. Most are in California (697), Florida (398), and Texas (337). In 2008, there were 111 death sentences issued, the fewest since 1976, when the Supreme Court reinstated the death penalty. 15-12
  • 13. Methods of Execution  Lethal injection  Predominant method in U.S  Used in 37 states  First adopted in 1977 by Oklahoma  Electrocution  Lethal gas  Hanging  Firing squad  The Federal Government authorizes both lethal injection or whichever method is in use in the convicting state. 15-13
  • 14. Death Row  A prison area housing inmates who have been sentenced to death  A prison within a prison  All but two death penalty states (Missouri and Tennessee) segregate death row inmates from the general prison population  Most death row inmates spend 22 to 23 hours per day locked down in a five-by-eight- or six-by- nine-foot cell 15-14
  • 15. Public Opinion and Death  Public still favors capital punishment.  Support for the death penalty drops when other punishment options, such as life without the possibility of parole are given.  People with higher incomes are more likely to support capital punishment than people with lower incomes. 15-15
  • 16. Continued  According to the Gallup Poll, public support for capital punishment in the United States was at its lowest in 1966 when only 42 percent of Americans supported it. It reached its highest level (80 percent) in 1994. 15-16
  • 17. Politics and Death  In January 2003, Illinois Governor George Ryan commuted 164 death sentences to life in prison, commuted three other death row inmates’ sentences to 40 years in prison, and pardoned four other death row inmates because of mounting evidence that the death penalty was not being applied fairly in Illinois. 15-17
  • 18. Courts and the Death Penalty Furman v. Georgia (1972)  The death penalty, as imposed and carried out under the laws of Georgia, was cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments  Voided all death penalty statutes because they allowed arbitrary and discriminatory imposition of the death sentence  The states responded by rewriting the statutes - some devised mandatory death penalties for certain crimes, while others opted for guided discretion that set standards to guide judges and juries 15-18
  • 19. Courts and the Death Penalty Mandatory Death Penalty  A death sentence that the legislature has required to be imposed upon people convicted of certain offenses.  Woodson v. North Carolina and Roberts v. Louisiana (1976) rejected mandatory death penalty statutes. 15-19
  • 20. Courts and the Death Penalty Gregg v. Georgia (1976)  Approved guided discretion statutes  Mandated a bifurcated trial process  The first part is the guilt phase, in which the jury decides the issue of guilt  The second part is the penalty phase, in which the prosecution presents aggravating factors and the defense present mitigating factors and a jury decides which punishment to impose  Approved automatic appellate review 15-20
  • 21. Key Terminology  Guided discretion: decision making bounded by general guidelines, rules, or laws  Bifurcated trial : two separated hearings for different issues in a trial, one for guilt and the other for punishment  Mitigating circumstances : factors that, although not justifying or excusing an action, may reduce the culpability of the offender  Aggravating circumstances : factors that may increase the culpability of the offender 15-21
  • 22. Appealing Death  The average time between imposition of a death sentence and execution of the offender is 11 years  Serious error – error that substantially undermines the reliability of the guilt finding or death sentence imposed at trial  Nationally, for every 100 death sentences imposed, 41 were turned back at the trial and direct review phase because of serious error 15-22
  • 23. Appealing Death – Continued  Death penalty cases may pass through as many as 10 courts across three stages: trial and direct review, state postconviction appeals, and federal habeas corpus appeals 15-23
  • 24. Appealing Death – Continued  Second stage reviews (state post- conviction appeals) detect serious error in 10 percent of the capital cases reviewed  Despite extensive state-level appellate review, federal courts still find serious error in 40 percent of the capital cases they review 15-24
  • 25. The Liebman Study  The overall rate of prejudicial error in the U.S. capital punishment system is 68%  Serious flaws existed in more than two out of three capital cases reviewed by the courts  The error rate in some states exceeded 75%  Almost 1,000 retried cases ended in sentences less than death  Retrials in 87 cases ended in verdicts of not guilty 15-25
  • 26. Juveniles and the Death Penalty  The first juvenile executed was Thomas Graunger in 1642 when he was hanged in Massachusetts for buggery. He was sixteen.  The U.S. has put to death 365 people for offenses they committed as children.  From 1976 to March 2, 2005, 22 people were executed for crimes they committed as juveniles. 15-26
  • 27. Juveniles and the Death Penalty  In Thompson v. Oklahoma (1988), the Court held that it is unconstitutional to execute a 15-year-old.  In Roper v. Simmons (2005) the Court held that it is unconstitutional to execute anyone for a crime they committed before turning age 18. 15-27
  • 28. Juveniles and the Death Penalty  Justices cited scientific literature from the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, the American Medical Association, and the American Psychological Association showing that adolescents lack mature judgment, are less aware of the consequences of their decisions and actions, are more vulnerable than adults to peer pressure, and have a greater tendency toward impulsiveness and lesser reasoning skills, regardless of how big they are or how tough they talk 15-28
  • 29. The Mentally Retarded and Death  Atkins v. Virginia (2002) held the execution of the mentally retarded to be a violation of the Eighth Amendment ban against cruel and unusual punishment.  The Court cited the development of a national consensus against such executions.  Atkins also left it to the states to define mental retardation. 15-29