Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
The Limits of Prior Restraint
1. The limits of prior restraint
How far can the press go?
2. Sedition Act of 1798
• Alexander Hamilton (left) is
accused of corruption by
James Thomson Callender
• Callender is imprisoned and
fined
• Callender later turns on
Jefferson, his benefactor
3. The end of seditious libel
• Sedition Act helps
lead to Adams’ defeat
in 1800
• Jefferson (left) lets
Sedition Act lapse
• Still, press is less free
during wartime
4. Abraham Lincoln
• Suspended habeas
corpus to crack down on
protesters
• Ohio publisher Clement
Laird Vallandigham
banished behind
Confederate lines
• Censorship in effect
5. Schenckv. United States (1919)
• Schenck charged with
violating Espionage Act
• Holmes (right)
establishes a new
standard: “clear and
present danger”
• Wartime is different
6. Gitlowv. New York (1925)
• 14th Amendment
extends First
Amendment to the
states
• Holmes now takes a
more expansive view
of free speech
• “Every idea is an
incitement”
7. Whitney v. California (1927)
• Brandeis (left) refines
“clear and present
danger”
• A “serious” and
“imminent” threat —
an “emergency”
• Brandeis sided with
majority on
technicality
8. Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969)
• Speech can be
prohibited if “directed
at inciting or
producing imminent
lawless action” and —
• Is “likely to incite or
produce such action”
• Brandeis standard
9. Near v. Minnesota (1931)
• Classic case defining
the limits of prior
restraint
• History of case told by
Fred Friendly in
Minnesota Rag
10. The Saturday Press
• Begun by Jay Near and
Howard Guilford
• Claimed Minneapolis was
controlled by Jewish
gangsters
• Shut down after nine
issues under state’s
Public Nuisance Law
11. Near loses at state level
• Argues that Public Nuisance Law violates
the First, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments
• Minnesota Supreme Court: “There is no
constitutional right to publish a fact merely
because it is true.”
13. Bad cases make bad law
• Harry Chandler, head of American
Newspaper Publishers Association, was
reluctant to get involved
• The Saturday Press was unsavory
• Chandler feared a defeat would set back
the cause of press freedom
14. Charles Evans Hughes
• Chief Justice replaced
Justice
Sanford, author of
Gitlow decision
• Reaffirmed that the
14th Amendment
incorporated the First
Amendment
15. Weymouth Kirkland
• “[E]very legitimate newspaper in the
country regularly and customarily publishes
defamation, as it has a right to in criticizing
government agencies”
• Akin to saying that seditious libel is the
purpose of a free press
16. Justice Brandeis
• “Of course there was defamation; you
cannot disclose evil without naming the
doers of evil”
• “A newspaper cannot always wait until it
gets the judgment of a court”
• Isn’t this why we have a First Amendment?
17. Near wins, 5-4
• Near fails to re-establish himself as a
newspaperman, dies in 1936
• Howard Guilford is assassinated by
gangsters in 1934
• Nevertheless, they contribute to the idea of
no prior restraint
18. Key points of Near
• Exceptions to the rule of no prior restraint
– National security
• Obstruction of draft
• Disclosing movement of ships or troops
– Obscenity
– Fighting words (incitement)
19. Key points of Near
• Exceptions to the rule of no prior restraint
• Unprotected speech may be punished after
the fact
– William Blackstone
– “Criminal” speech
– Libel — certainly an issue with The Saturday
Press
20. Key points of Near
• Exceptions to the rule of no prior restraint
• Unprotected speech may be punished after
the fact
• Minnesota’s Public Nuisance Law
tantamount to prior restraint
21. The Pentagon Papers
• Daniel Ellsberg
provided them to the
New York Times and
the Washington Post
• Federal appeals courts
ruled against the
Times and for the Post
• Supreme Court takes
the case
22. New York Times Co.
v. United States (1971)
• Supreme Court issues
nine separate
decisions
• Government could
prosecute after
publication
• Nixon tried, but was
derailed by Watergate