15. Table 6: After removing superfluous attribute ‘b’ & duplicate rules u a c d e f 1 3 2 2 2 4 2 3 2 1 2 4 3 2 2 1 1 4 4 2 2 2 1 4 5 3 2 3 2 3 6 4 2 3 2 3 7 4 3 3 2 2 8 4 3 2 2 2
16. a3c2d2 ==> e2f4 c2d2 ==> e2f4 (rule 1) c2d2 ==> e1f4 (rule 4) a3c2 ==> e2f4 (rule 1) a3c2 ==> e1f3 (rule 5) For e.g . let us compute core values and reduct values for the first decision rule: In the table 7, values ‘a’ and ‘d’ are indispensible in the rule Since the following pairs of rules are Inconsistent. Thus a3 and d2 are core values of the decision value a3c2d2 ---> e2f4
17. Table 6: Inconsitent rows without column a u c d e f 1 2 2 2 4 2 2 1 2 4 3 2 1 1 4 4 2 2 1 4 5 2 3 2 3 6 2 3 2 3 7 3 3 2 2 8 3 2 2 2
18. Table 6: Inconsitent rows without column c u a d e f 1 3 2 2 4 2 3 1 2 4 3 2 1 1 4 4 2 2 1 4 5 3 3 2 3 6 4 3 2 3 7 4 3 2 2 8 4 2 2 2
19. Table 6: Inconsitent rows without column d u a c e f 1 3 2 2 4 2 3 2 2 4 3 2 2 1 4 4 2 2 1 4 5 3 2 2 3 6 4 2 2 3 7 4 3 2 2 8 4 3 2 2