This document summarizes a study on laparoscopic adhesiolysis for small bowel obstruction. Key points include:
- Laparoscopic adhesiolysis has advantages over open surgery like less pain, quicker recovery, and fewer adhesions.
- Patient selection is important, and factors like bowel diameter >4cm or distal complete obstruction increase risk of conversion.
- The open technique for initial trocar insertion is recommended to avoid injury to adherent bowel.
- Adhesiolysis requires careful sharp dissection and avoidance of cautery to prevent new adhesions.
- Findings like perforated bowel or dense adhesions often require conversion to open surgery.
9. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for small bowel obstruction Alexander Nagle, M.D., Michael Ujiki, M.D., Woody Denham, M.D., Kenric Murayama, M.D.* The American Journal of Surgery 187 (2004) 464–470
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for small bowel obstruction Alexander Nagle, M.D., Michael Ujiki, M.D., Woody Denham, M.D., Kenric Murayama, M.D.* The American Journal of Surgery 187 (2004) 464–470
20. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for small bowel obstruction Alexander Nagle, M.D., Michael Ujiki, M.D., Woody Denham, M.D., Kenric Murayama, M.D.* The American Journal of Surgery 187 (2004) 464–470
21.
22.
23.
24. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for small bowel obstruction Alexander Nagle, M.D., Michael Ujiki, M.D., Woody Denham, M.D., Kenric Murayama, M.D.* The American Journal of Surgery 187 (2004) 464–470
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56. Laparoscopic compared with conventional treatment of acute adhesive small bowel obstruction C. Wullstein and E. Gross British Journal of Surgery 2003; 90 : 1147–1151
57. Laparoscopic compared with conventional treatment of acute adhesive small bowel obstruction C. Wullstein and E. Gross British Journal of Surgery 2003; 90 : 1147–1151
58.
59. Laparoscopic compared with conventional treatment of acute adhesive small bowel obstruction C. Wullstein and E. Gross British Journal of Surgery 2003; 90 : 1147–1151
60.
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
66.
67.
68. Results after laparoscopic lysis of adhesions and placement of Seprafilm for intractable abdominal pain L. Khaitan, S. Scholz, H. L. Houston, W. O. Richards Surg Endosc (2003) 17: 247–253
69.
70.
71.
72.
73.
74.
75.
76.
77.
78.
79.
80.
81.
82.
83.
84.
85.
86.
87.
88.
89.
90.
91.
92.
93.
94.
95.
96.
97.
98.
99.
100.
101. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for chronic abdominal pain is not indicated D. Swank* International Congress Series 1279 (2005) 85– 89
102.
103.
104.
105.
106.
107.
108.
109. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for recurrent small bowel obstruction: long-term follow-up Yoshiaki Sato, MD, Endoscopy 0016-5107/2001/ 1. A, Laparoscopic view of single band adhesion. B, Laparoscopic view of convoluted mass of adherent bowel.
110. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for recurrent small bowel obstruction: long-term follow-up Yoshiaki Sato, MD, Endoscopy 0016-5107/2001/
111.
112.
113.
114.
115.
116.
117.
118.
119.
120.
121. Laparoscopic management of acute small-bowel obstruction I. M. Ibrahim, F. Wolodiger, B. Sussman, M. Kahn, F. Silvestri