5. Relation between cost & quality
Elliott Fisher at Health Datapalooza 6/2/14
(Answer:
NO relation
between cost
& quality.
Enormous
variation!)
(What if everyone
started doing
what the lower left
does?)
Deathrate!
Cost of the care !
6.
7.
8.
9.
10. “It can be argued
that the largest
yet most neglected
health care
resource,
worldwide,
is the patient…”
11. How I came to be here
• High tech marketing
• Data geek; tech trends; automation
• 2007: Cancer discovery & recovery
• 2008: E-Patient blogger
• 2009: Participatory
Medicine, Public Speaker
• 2010: full time
• 2011: international
16. Me? An indicator
of the future??
• Who’s getting online:
– 1989: Me (CompuServe sysop)
– 2009: 76% of US adults (Pew)
• Who’s romancing online:
– 1999: I met my wife (Match.com)
– 2009: One in eight weddings
in the U.S. met online
– 2011: One in five couples
met online
26. ACOR members told me:
• This is an uncommon disease –
get to a hospital that does a lot of cases
• There’s no cure, but HDIL-2 sometimes works.
– When it does, about half the time it’s permanent
– The side effects are severe.
• Don’t let them give you anything else first
• Here are four doctors in your area who do it
– And one of them was at my hospital
31. How can it be
that the most useful
and relevant and
up-to-the-minute information
can exist outside of
traditional channels?
32. If I read two journal articles every night,
at the end of a year I’d be 400 years behind.
It’s not humanly possible to keep up.
Dr. Lindberg: 400 years
33. The lethal lag time:
2-5 years
During this time,
people who might have benefitted can die.
Patients have all the time in the world
to look for such things.
The time it takes after successful research is completed
before publication is completed and the article’s been read.
34. Compare with
To Err is Human (98,000 deaths/yr Nov 1999)
Death by Googling:
Not.
(Dr. Gunther Eysenbach, Europe: 0 deaths found in a three year search)
36. These conclusions
are no more anti-doctor
or anti-medicine
than Copernicus and Galileo
were anti-astronomer.
Patients can simply contribute
more today than in the past.
37. Because of the Web,
Patients Can Connect to Information
and Each Other (and other Providers)
40. “Now I know why docs
don’t give you scan data.
I see theVirgin Mary,
Jimmy Hoffa, several forks,
and Saddam’s yellowcake
hiding in my guts.”
“And this CT scan makes my butt look big.”
@Xeni
Live tweeting, 12-18-2011
41. “So I figure out how to open
my bone scan data. I look.”
“What the...”
“What’s that ****-shaped
ghost-shadow thing—
it looks like I have a penis!”
“I call a hacker pal.‘That, Xeni, is a ****.’”
“I look at metadata more carefully. THEY GAVE ME
THE WRONG DATA. SOME OTHER DUDE’S SCANS.”
@Xeni
Next day: 12-19-2011
42. Pre-op:“At least you won’t be lopsided.”
“What do you mean?”
“You’re getting a bilateral mastectomy.”
“No I’m not!”
“That’s what came to us on this paper.”
52. • 99% of patients wanted to continue!
• 17-26% of docs preferred not to…!
– But when given the chance to stop, none did!
• 85-89% of patients said availability of "
open notes would influence their
choice of providers and health plans!
55. Yes, the IOM itself
says e-patients are an
essential part of
tomorrow’s healthcare.
.
Patient-Clinician Partnerships .
Engaged, empowered patients—
A learning health care system is
anchored on patient needs and perspectives
and promotes the inclusion of patients,
families, and other caregivers as vital
members of the continuously learning care
team.