SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 17
TRADE MARK OPPOSITIONS IN ITALY
             OVERVIEW
(also in comparison with CTM system)




                      Società Italiana Brevetti (“SIB”)
           Roma, Firenze, Milano, Verona – www.sib.it
Some rough figures
Number of Italian TM applications published                                                            26.559
as of Bulletin No of 11 July 2011, up till Bulletin No 9 of 8 March 2012

Number of Italian IR designations published                                                            2.507
as of WIPO Gazette No 24 of 7 July 2011, up till WIPO Gazette No 7 of 8 March 2012

Number of published oppositions
till Bulletin No 9 of 8 March 2012                                                                       772
                                                                                                       i.e. 3%

NB Informal, approximate n° of oppositions lodged on 8 March 2012 including unpublished ones             900
                                                                                               98% TMs   (identical or LOC)
Oppositions grounds in % *                                                                          of which 39% IT TM
*calculated on data of published oppositions                                                                  47% CTM
                                                                                                                 11% IR
                                                                                               2% : Other rights
Outline of Italian opposition proceedings


1. Trademarks subject to opposition:

    •    published Italian trademark applications filed as of 1
         May 2011

    •    Italian designations of International trademarks
         published on WIPO’s Gazette as of July 2011:
         regardless of the date of their registration (or subsequent
         designation)

P.S.: All classes immediately open to opposition
Outline of Italian opposition proceedings



2. Time limit:

   •   3 months from publication in National Bulletin, or

   •   3 months, commencing on the first day of the month
       following publication in the WIPO Gazette (as of July
       2011) – difference with CTM system!
Outline of Italian opposition proceedings


    3. Grounds:

    (iii) Identical or similar marks covering identical
          or similar goods/services

    (v) Certain specific names or signs failing prior
        consent by the right owner to register them
        as trademarks
Outline of Italian opposition proceedings



  3. Grounds:
  (iii) Prior identical or similar marks* covering identical or
        similar goods/services: i.e.

  -     “Double identity”: identical signs and identical g/s; or

  -     LoC: identical or similar signs and identical or similar
        g/s so as to cause a LoC on the part of the public (incl.
        LoA)

  * Earlier IT, CTM or IR designating Italy (TM registration or application)
Outline of Italian opposition proceedings

  3. Grounds:
  (ii) Certain specific names or signs failing prior consent
       by the right owner to register them as trademarks: i.e.
  -    image rights,
  -    personal name other than the applicant’s name if its use in
       the trademark may harm the reputation of the person entitled
       to bear the name,
  -    well-known personal names,
  -    well-known signs used in the artistic, literary, scientific,
       political or sporting fields,
  -    well-known denominations or initials or characteristic
       emblems of events and of non-profit bodies.
Outline of Italian opposition proceedings

        3. Grounds:
        ⇒      NO opposition can be filed on the basis of :
              unregistered rights or copyrights (except in the specific cases set
               out above under (ii)),
              company names,
              domain names,
              reputation of an earlier mark registered or applied for dissimilar g/s,
              It is NOT possible for the owner to oppose against an application
               filed by an agent or representative in its own name and without
               owner’s consent.
  In the absence of a voluntary cancellation, the only means of attacking on the above grounds remains
  the filing of a cancellation action before the competent Italian IP court.

  The same goes for obtaining the revocation (e.g. extinction of rights through non-use)
Outline of Italian opposition proceedings


   4. Who may initiate an opposition:
   •   Owner (even if non recorded)

   •   Exclusive Licensee (unless license agreement
       excludes it) – difference with CTM system!

   (evidence to be filed within 2 months ̶ non extendable ̶
   from expiry of cooling-off)
Outline of Italian opposition proceedings

5. Fees (amount- payment - refund) & apportionment of costs:

     •     Amount official fees: € 250 (+ € 34 if no general POA or POA
           including lodging of oppositions already of record ) + stamp
           fees

     •     Payment: to be paid prior to filing of opposition (failure of
           attaching proof of payment leads to withdrawal)

     •     Refund: if, before the commencement of the adversarial part
           of proceedings, the parties reach a settlement and the Office
           is informed accordingly: refund official opposition fee

     •     Costs: in its decision rejecting or upholding the opposition,
           the Office may award costs to the winning party of up to a
           maximum of € 300 in professional fees and € 250 in official
           opposition fees.
Outline of Italian opposition proceedings



    6. Procedure:
    the good and the bad sides
Outline of Italian opposition proceedings


6. Procedure: the good sides
•     Cooling-off period: expires 2 months from notification of admissibility -
      extendable upon joint request by the parties by up to a maximum of 12
      months (>< OHIM’s 24 month maximum limit)

•     Submission of supporting documents (registration certificates,
      translations…): may be filed within 2 months (non extendable) from the expiry
      of the cooling-off

•     Defence of PoU: applicant may request PoU of any registration if granted ≥
      5years - to be submitted within 60 days from notification to do so (on penalty
      of the rejection of opposition) – term extendable upon request up to a
      maximum of 6 months

•     Decision must be issued within 24 months from date of lodging opposition
      (without taking into account c-o period or period of suspension such as
      opposition based on pending application/mark pending cancellation where
      such suspension is requested by its owner)
Outline of Italian opposition proceedings
      Differences with CTM system

  6. Procedure:
  the bad sides

  •   Limited grounds for opposition

  •   Inexperience of the Italian PTO
Recommendations for businesses
• Trademark watch service!

• Increased importance of registration in classes of current
  and potential interest

• Exclusive licensees must make sure they have written
  consent of licensor to lodge an opposition if their license
  agreement does not specifically entitle them to do so.

  Conversely, trademark owners that do not want their
  exclusive licensees file oppositions, must make sure that
  the license contract precludes it.

• Prior right holders intending to lodge an opposition on the
  basis of a trademark subject to user requirements should
  have sufficient evidence ready to prove genuine use
Additional issues

• Observations by third parties (no time limit, up till
  registration of the mark)
• Geographical indications
• State Emblems, Official Hallmarks and Emblems of
  Intergovernmental Organizations
• Provisional refusals IR: mandatory to appoint a
  representative before the Italian PTO within non-
  extendable term to obtain copy of the opposition notice
  (penalty: final refusal)
Concluding remarks

• Welcome addition to the Italian legal system
• Means of exerting pressure, sometimes avoiding
  expensive court proceedings
• Ideal and cost-effective resource for monitoring and
  keeping (future) competitors at a distance
• Importance of assessment on a case by case basis
  whether filing an opposition is the best option.
Società Italiana brevetti (“SIB”)

                         Offices


Rome                               Milan
E-mail: roma@sib.it                E-mail: milano@sib.it
Phone: +39 06.69.54.41             Phone: +39 02.80.63.31

Florence                           Verona

Más contenido relacionado

Similar a Tm Oppositions In Italy - March2012

Global Intellectual Property Convention 2016 -Enforcement of Trademarks in Af...
Global Intellectual Property Convention 2016 -Enforcement of Trademarks in Af...Global Intellectual Property Convention 2016 -Enforcement of Trademarks in Af...
Global Intellectual Property Convention 2016 -Enforcement of Trademarks in Af...
Vanessa Halle
 
IPR_Patent, Trademark, Copyrights
IPR_Patent, Trademark, Copyrights IPR_Patent, Trademark, Copyrights
IPR_Patent, Trademark, Copyrights
Parul Institute of Pharmacy
 

Similar a Tm Oppositions In Italy - March2012 (20)

Differences Italian and OHIM opposition procedure
Differences Italian and OHIM opposition procedureDifferences Italian and OHIM opposition procedure
Differences Italian and OHIM opposition procedure
 
Intellectual property regime
Intellectual property regimeIntellectual property regime
Intellectual property regime
 
Intellectual property 2018
Intellectual property 2018Intellectual property 2018
Intellectual property 2018
 
BUlLETIN- Should I file an observation or opposition.pdf
BUlLETIN- Should I file an observation or opposition.pdfBUlLETIN- Should I file an observation or opposition.pdf
BUlLETIN- Should I file an observation or opposition.pdf
 
Critical Changes To Vietnam's Patents, Trademarks, And Industrial Designs Und...
Critical Changes To Vietnam's Patents, Trademarks, And Industrial Designs Und...Critical Changes To Vietnam's Patents, Trademarks, And Industrial Designs Und...
Critical Changes To Vietnam's Patents, Trademarks, And Industrial Designs Und...
 
Intellectual Property in Colombia
Intellectual Property in ColombiaIntellectual Property in Colombia
Intellectual Property in Colombia
 
Vietnam's 2022 amended IP Law - What do new trademark provisions mean for you...
Vietnam's 2022 amended IP Law - What do new trademark provisions mean for you...Vietnam's 2022 amended IP Law - What do new trademark provisions mean for you...
Vietnam's 2022 amended IP Law - What do new trademark provisions mean for you...
 
China IPR Guide for European SMEs in the Ceramics Industry
China IPR Guide for European SMEs in the Ceramics Industry China IPR Guide for European SMEs in the Ceramics Industry
China IPR Guide for European SMEs in the Ceramics Industry
 
Claiming damages in IPR lawsuits in Vietnam
Claiming damages in IPR lawsuits in VietnamClaiming damages in IPR lawsuits in Vietnam
Claiming damages in IPR lawsuits in Vietnam
 
Global Intellectual Property Convention 2016 -Enforcement of Trademarks in Af...
Global Intellectual Property Convention 2016 -Enforcement of Trademarks in Af...Global Intellectual Property Convention 2016 -Enforcement of Trademarks in Af...
Global Intellectual Property Convention 2016 -Enforcement of Trademarks in Af...
 
How to Successfully Argue Wide Use Evidence in Trademark Opposition and Cance...
How to Successfully Argue Wide Use Evidence in Trademark Opposition and Cance...How to Successfully Argue Wide Use Evidence in Trademark Opposition and Cance...
How to Successfully Argue Wide Use Evidence in Trademark Opposition and Cance...
 
IPR_Patent, Trademark, Copyrights
IPR_Patent, Trademark, Copyrights IPR_Patent, Trademark, Copyrights
IPR_Patent, Trademark, Copyrights
 
Trademark and Paten Registration
Trademark and Paten RegistrationTrademark and Paten Registration
Trademark and Paten Registration
 
An overview of the available remedies against infringements in Italy: civil, ...
An overview of the available remedies against infringements in Italy: civil, ...An overview of the available remedies against infringements in Italy: civil, ...
An overview of the available remedies against infringements in Italy: civil, ...
 
Filing PCT National Phase Patent Applications in Thailand
Filing PCT National Phase Patent Applications in ThailandFiling PCT National Phase Patent Applications in Thailand
Filing PCT National Phase Patent Applications in Thailand
 
Patent, Trademark, Industrial Design in Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar
Patent, Trademark, Industrial Design in Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar Patent, Trademark, Industrial Design in Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar
Patent, Trademark, Industrial Design in Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar
 
Ipr notes
Ipr notesIpr notes
Ipr notes
 
Trade mark registration processes (2)
Trade mark registration processes (2)Trade mark registration processes (2)
Trade mark registration processes (2)
 
Madrid system
Madrid systemMadrid system
Madrid system
 
Trademark law treaty
Trademark law treatyTrademark law treaty
Trademark law treaty
 

Más de Edith Van den Eede (6)

Ecta2015 non agri g-is and their impact on tms_edith van den eede
Ecta2015 non agri g-is and their impact on tms_edith van den eedeEcta2015 non agri g-is and their impact on tms_edith van den eede
Ecta2015 non agri g-is and their impact on tms_edith van den eede
 
ECTA2015_Non-agri GIs and their impact on TMs_Edith Van den Eede
ECTA2015_Non-agri GIs and their impact on TMs_Edith Van den EedeECTA2015_Non-agri GIs and their impact on TMs_Edith Van den Eede
ECTA2015_Non-agri GIs and their impact on TMs_Edith Van den Eede
 
Presentation Parma Relationship GIs and Trademarks 15March2013
Presentation Parma Relationship GIs and Trademarks 15March2013Presentation Parma Relationship GIs and Trademarks 15March2013
Presentation Parma Relationship GIs and Trademarks 15March2013
 
Oposiciones al registro de marca en Italia - Introduccion y comparacion con e...
Oposiciones al registro de marca en Italia - Introduccion y comparacion con e...Oposiciones al registro de marca en Italia - Introduccion y comparacion con e...
Oposiciones al registro de marca en Italia - Introduccion y comparacion con e...
 
La procedure d’opposition en Italie - Introduction et comparaison avec la mar...
La procedure d’opposition en Italie - Introduction et comparaison avec la mar...La procedure d’opposition en Italie - Introduction et comparaison avec la mar...
La procedure d’opposition en Italie - Introduction et comparaison avec la mar...
 
Merkenoppositie in Italië - Inleiding en vergelijking met het CTM systeem
Merkenoppositie in Italië - Inleiding en vergelijking met het CTM systeemMerkenoppositie in Italië - Inleiding en vergelijking met het CTM systeem
Merkenoppositie in Italië - Inleiding en vergelijking met het CTM systeem
 

Tm Oppositions In Italy - March2012

  • 1. TRADE MARK OPPOSITIONS IN ITALY OVERVIEW (also in comparison with CTM system) Società Italiana Brevetti (“SIB”) Roma, Firenze, Milano, Verona – www.sib.it
  • 2. Some rough figures Number of Italian TM applications published 26.559 as of Bulletin No of 11 July 2011, up till Bulletin No 9 of 8 March 2012 Number of Italian IR designations published 2.507 as of WIPO Gazette No 24 of 7 July 2011, up till WIPO Gazette No 7 of 8 March 2012 Number of published oppositions till Bulletin No 9 of 8 March 2012 772 i.e. 3% NB Informal, approximate n° of oppositions lodged on 8 March 2012 including unpublished ones 900 98% TMs (identical or LOC) Oppositions grounds in % * of which 39% IT TM *calculated on data of published oppositions 47% CTM 11% IR 2% : Other rights
  • 3. Outline of Italian opposition proceedings 1. Trademarks subject to opposition: • published Italian trademark applications filed as of 1 May 2011 • Italian designations of International trademarks published on WIPO’s Gazette as of July 2011: regardless of the date of their registration (or subsequent designation) P.S.: All classes immediately open to opposition
  • 4. Outline of Italian opposition proceedings 2. Time limit: • 3 months from publication in National Bulletin, or • 3 months, commencing on the first day of the month following publication in the WIPO Gazette (as of July 2011) – difference with CTM system!
  • 5. Outline of Italian opposition proceedings 3. Grounds: (iii) Identical or similar marks covering identical or similar goods/services (v) Certain specific names or signs failing prior consent by the right owner to register them as trademarks
  • 6. Outline of Italian opposition proceedings 3. Grounds: (iii) Prior identical or similar marks* covering identical or similar goods/services: i.e. - “Double identity”: identical signs and identical g/s; or - LoC: identical or similar signs and identical or similar g/s so as to cause a LoC on the part of the public (incl. LoA) * Earlier IT, CTM or IR designating Italy (TM registration or application)
  • 7. Outline of Italian opposition proceedings 3. Grounds: (ii) Certain specific names or signs failing prior consent by the right owner to register them as trademarks: i.e. - image rights, - personal name other than the applicant’s name if its use in the trademark may harm the reputation of the person entitled to bear the name, - well-known personal names, - well-known signs used in the artistic, literary, scientific, political or sporting fields, - well-known denominations or initials or characteristic emblems of events and of non-profit bodies.
  • 8. Outline of Italian opposition proceedings 3. Grounds: ⇒ NO opposition can be filed on the basis of :  unregistered rights or copyrights (except in the specific cases set out above under (ii)),  company names,  domain names,  reputation of an earlier mark registered or applied for dissimilar g/s,  It is NOT possible for the owner to oppose against an application filed by an agent or representative in its own name and without owner’s consent. In the absence of a voluntary cancellation, the only means of attacking on the above grounds remains the filing of a cancellation action before the competent Italian IP court. The same goes for obtaining the revocation (e.g. extinction of rights through non-use)
  • 9. Outline of Italian opposition proceedings 4. Who may initiate an opposition: • Owner (even if non recorded) • Exclusive Licensee (unless license agreement excludes it) – difference with CTM system! (evidence to be filed within 2 months ̶ non extendable ̶ from expiry of cooling-off)
  • 10. Outline of Italian opposition proceedings 5. Fees (amount- payment - refund) & apportionment of costs: • Amount official fees: € 250 (+ € 34 if no general POA or POA including lodging of oppositions already of record ) + stamp fees • Payment: to be paid prior to filing of opposition (failure of attaching proof of payment leads to withdrawal) • Refund: if, before the commencement of the adversarial part of proceedings, the parties reach a settlement and the Office is informed accordingly: refund official opposition fee • Costs: in its decision rejecting or upholding the opposition, the Office may award costs to the winning party of up to a maximum of € 300 in professional fees and € 250 in official opposition fees.
  • 11. Outline of Italian opposition proceedings 6. Procedure: the good and the bad sides
  • 12. Outline of Italian opposition proceedings 6. Procedure: the good sides • Cooling-off period: expires 2 months from notification of admissibility - extendable upon joint request by the parties by up to a maximum of 12 months (>< OHIM’s 24 month maximum limit) • Submission of supporting documents (registration certificates, translations…): may be filed within 2 months (non extendable) from the expiry of the cooling-off • Defence of PoU: applicant may request PoU of any registration if granted ≥ 5years - to be submitted within 60 days from notification to do so (on penalty of the rejection of opposition) – term extendable upon request up to a maximum of 6 months • Decision must be issued within 24 months from date of lodging opposition (without taking into account c-o period or period of suspension such as opposition based on pending application/mark pending cancellation where such suspension is requested by its owner)
  • 13. Outline of Italian opposition proceedings Differences with CTM system 6. Procedure: the bad sides • Limited grounds for opposition • Inexperience of the Italian PTO
  • 14. Recommendations for businesses • Trademark watch service! • Increased importance of registration in classes of current and potential interest • Exclusive licensees must make sure they have written consent of licensor to lodge an opposition if their license agreement does not specifically entitle them to do so. Conversely, trademark owners that do not want their exclusive licensees file oppositions, must make sure that the license contract precludes it. • Prior right holders intending to lodge an opposition on the basis of a trademark subject to user requirements should have sufficient evidence ready to prove genuine use
  • 15. Additional issues • Observations by third parties (no time limit, up till registration of the mark) • Geographical indications • State Emblems, Official Hallmarks and Emblems of Intergovernmental Organizations • Provisional refusals IR: mandatory to appoint a representative before the Italian PTO within non- extendable term to obtain copy of the opposition notice (penalty: final refusal)
  • 16. Concluding remarks • Welcome addition to the Italian legal system • Means of exerting pressure, sometimes avoiding expensive court proceedings • Ideal and cost-effective resource for monitoring and keeping (future) competitors at a distance • Importance of assessment on a case by case basis whether filing an opposition is the best option.
  • 17. Società Italiana brevetti (“SIB”) Offices Rome Milan E-mail: roma@sib.it E-mail: milano@sib.it Phone: +39 06.69.54.41 Phone: +39 02.80.63.31 Florence Verona