Converged Data Center: FCoE, iSCSI and the Future of Storage Networking

CONVERGED DATA
CENTER:

FCoE, iSCSI AND THE FUTURE OF
STORAGE NETWORKING

David L. Black, Ph.D.
Distinguished Engineer

© Copyright 2012 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved. 1

Agenda
 Network
Convergence
 Protocols & Standards
 Server Virtualization
 Solution Evolution
 Conclusion


10Gb Ethernet Converged Data Center
 Maturation of 10 Gigabit Ethernet
– Replace 1Gb adapters with fewer (start with 2) 10Gb adapters
– Single network simplifies mobility for virtualization/cloud deployments

Single Wire for SAN
10 GbE Network and Storage
LAN

 10 Gigabit Ethernet simplifies infrastructure
– Reduces the number of cables and server adapters
– Lowers capital expenditures and administrative costs
– Reduces server power and cooling costs
– Blade servers and server virtualization drive consolidated bandwidth

FCoE and iSCSI both leverage this inflection point


Conventional Rack Servers
Ethernet
Fibre Channel iSCSI SAN • Servers connect to LAN, NAS
and iSCSI SAN with NICs
Gigabit Ethernet • Servers connect to FC SAN
with HBAs
• Many environments today are
Gigabit Ethernet still Gigabit Ethernet
• Multiple server adapters,
Fibre
higher power/ cooling costs
Gigabit Ethernet LAN
– Separate storage network (incl. iSCSI)
Ethernet Channel
HBAs
NICs
Note: NAS is part of the converged
Fibre Channel SAN approach. Everywhere that
Ethernet or 10Gb Ethernet is used
in this presentation, NAS can be
considered part of the unified
Storage storage solution
Rack-mount
servers


Agenda

• Network Convergence
• Protocols &
Standards
• Server Virtualization
• Solution Evolution
• Conclusion


iSCSI Introduction
 Transport storage (SCSI) over standard Ethernet
– Reliability through TCP
 More flexible than FC due to IP routing
SCSI
 Good performance
iSCSI
 iSCSI has thrived
– Especially where the server, storage and network TCP
administrators are the same person
IP

Link

IP Network


iSCSI Introduction (continued)
 Standardized in 2004: IETF RFC 3720
– Stable: No major changes since 2004
– iSCSI Corrections and Clarifications: IETF RFC 5048 (2007)
– Now underway: consolidated spec, minor updates

 iSCSI Session: One Initiator and one Target
– Multiple TCP connections allowed in a session

 Important iSCSI additions to SCSI
– Immediate and unsolicited data to avoid round trip
– Login phase for connection setup
– Explicit logout for clean teardown


iSCSI Read Example
Initiator Target
SCSI Read
Data in PDU
Command
Target
Data in PDU

Receive Data in PDU
Data

Status
Command
Complete
Optimization: Good
status can be
included with last
“Data in” PDU


iSCSI Write Example
Initiator Target

Ready to
SCSI Write
Transmit
Command
(R2T)
Optimization:
Immediate and/or
Data out PDU Receive unsolicited data
Data
Data out PDU avoids a round trip

Data out PDU R2T

Data out PDU

Receive
Data

Command
Status
Complete


iSCSI Encapsulation

Ethernet
IP TCP iSCSI Data CRC
Header

Delivery of iSCSI Protocol
Data Unit (PDU) for SCSI
functionality (initiator, target,
data read/write, etc.)
Reliable data transport and delivery (TCP
Windows, ACKs, ordering, etc.) Also
demux within node (port numbers)

Provides IP routing capability so packets
can find their way through the network
Provides physical network capability (Cat 6, MAC, etc.)


FCoE: Why a New Option for FC?
 FC: large and well managed installed base
– Leverage FC expertise / investment
– Other convergence options not incremental for existing FC

 Data Center solution for I/O consolidation
 Leverage Ethernet infrastructure and skill set

FCoE allows an Ethernet-based SAN to be introduced
into an FC-based Data Center
without breaking existing administrative tools and workflows


FCoE Extends FC on a Single Network
Server sees storage traffic as FC

Ethernet
Network FC
Network
Driver Driver

Converged FC storage
Network Adapter

SAN sees host as FC
Lossless Ethernet
FC network

FCoE
Switch
Ethernet
FC


FCoE Frames
 FC frames encapsulated in Layer 2 Ethernet frames
– No TCP, Lossless Ethernet required
– No IP routing
 1:1 frame encapsulation
– FC frame never segmented across multiple Ethernet frames
 Requires at least Mini Jumbo (2.5k) Ethernet frames
– Max FC payload size: 2180 bytes
– Max FCoE frame size: 2240 bytes FC Frame

Header
Ethernet

FC Payload
Header
Header

CRC
FCoE

EOF
FC

FCS

FCoE Initialization
Ethernet is more than a cable

 Native FC link: Optical fiber has 2 endpoints (simple)
– Discovery: Who’s at the other end?
– Liveness: Is the other end still there?
 FCoE virtual link: Ethernet LAN or VLAN, 3+ endpoints possible
– Discovery: Choice of FCoE switches
– Liveness: FCoE virtual link may span multiple Ethernet links
▪ Single link liveness check isn’t enough, where’s the problem?

 FCoE configuration: Do mini jumbo (or larger) frames work?
 FIP: FCoE Initialization Protocol
– Discover endpoints, create and initialize virtual link with FCoE switch
– Mini jumbo frame support: Large frame is part of discovery
– Periodic LKA (Link Keep Alive) messages after initialization


FCoE Switch Discovery FCoE/FC
Step 1: FIP Solicitation Switches

Server
DCB Ethernet FC SAN

Solicitation

 Select FCoE VLAN first (pre-config or FIP)
 Multicast Solicitation: Server can discover multiple switches
 Solicitation identifies Server (FC WWN for FCoE CNA)
– CNA = Converged Network Adapter (FCoE analog of HBA)
– Switch chooses servers to respond to (default: respond to all)


FCoE Switch Discovery FCoE/FC
Step 2: FIP Advertisement Switches

Server
DCB Ethernet FC SAN

Advertisement
Priority = 1

Advertisement

Priority = 25
 Advertisement identifies switch
– Multiple switches may respond, advertisement includes priority
– Server chooses FCoE switch by priority (smallest number wins)
 Advertisement padded to max FC frame size: Test mini jumbo frames


FIP Switch Discovery FCoE/FC
Step 3: FIP-based FC Login Switches

Server
DCB Ethernet FC SAN

FLOGI
Priority = 1

FLOGI ACC

Priority = 25
 FIP encapsulated FC Login
– Server sends FC Fabric Login (FLOGI) to selected switch
– Switch responds with FC FLOGI ACC (accept) with assigned FCID
 All further traffic is standard FC frames (FCoE encapsulated)


FCoE and Ethernet Standards –
Two complementary standards efforts
Fibre Channel over Ethernet (FCoE) Data Center Bridging (DCB) Ethernet
 Developed by International  Developed by IEEE Data Center
Committee for Information Bridging (DCB) Task Group
Technology Standards (INCITS)  DCB Ethernet drops frames as
T11 Fibre Channel Interfaces rarely as FC
Technical Committee  Technology commonly referred to
 Enables FC traffic over Ethernet as Lossless Ethernet
 FC-BB-5 standard: June 2009  IEEE standards: final approval
 FC-BB-6 standard in process to March 2011
expand solution  DCB: Required for FCoE
 DCB: Enhancement for iSCSI

Companies working on the standard committees
Key participants: Brocade, Cisco, EMC, Emulex, HP, IBM, Intel, QLogic, others


FC-BB-6 – New FCoE features
 Direct connection of servers to storage
– PT2PT [point to point]: Single cable
– VN2VN [VN_Port to VN_Port]: Single Ethernet LAN or VLAN
 Better support for FC fabric scaling (switch count)
– Distribute logical FC fabric switch functionality
– Enables every DCB Ethernet switch to participate in FCoE

For more, see Erik Smith’s (EMC E-Lab) presentation:
FCoE - Topologies, Protocol, and Limitations
Tues 10:00am and Wed 4:15pm


Lossless Ethernet (DCB)
 IEEE 802.1 Data Center Bridging (DCB)
 Link level enhancements:
1. Enhanced Transmission Selection (ETS)
2. Priority Flow Control (PFC)
3. Data Center Bridging Exchange Protocol (DCBX)

 DCB: network portion that must be lossless
– Generally limited to data center distances per link
– Can use long-distance optics, but uncommon in practice

DCB Ethernet provides the Lossless Infrastructure
that enables FCoE. DCB also improves iSCSI.


Enhanced Transmission Selection
DCB part 1: IEEE 802.1Qaz [ETS]
Management framework for link bandwidth

• Priority configuration and bandwidth reservation
– HPC & storage traffic have higher priority
– HPC & storage traffic reserve bandwidth
• Low latency for Offered Traffic 10 GE Link Realized Traffic Utilization

high priority traffic 3G/s 3G/s 2G/s
3G/s HPC Traffic 2G/s
3G/s
– Unused bandwidth
available to other 3G/s Storage Traffic 3G/s
3G/s 3G/s 3G/s
traffic 3G/s

3G/s 4G/s 6G/s 3G/s LAN Traffic 5G/s
4G/s

t1 t2 t3 t1 t2 t3


PAUSE and Priority Flow Control
DCB part 2: IEEE 802.1Qbb & 802.3bd [PFC]
 PAUSE can produce lossless Ethernet behavior
– Original 802.3x PAUSE stops all traffic: rarely implemented
 New PAUSE: Priority Flow Control (PFC)
– Pause per priority level
– No effect on traffic at other priority levels
– Creates lossless virtual lanes
 Per priority flow control
– Enable/disable per priority
▪ Only for traffic that needs it
– Better link management
than 8-way PAUSE

Switch A Switch B


Data Center Bridging Capability eXchange
DCB part 3: IEEE 802.1Qaz (again) [DCBX]
FCoE/FC
Switches

Server
DCB Ethernet FC SAN

DCBX

• Ethernet Link configuration (single link)
– Extends Link Layer Discovery Protocol (LLDP)
• Reliably enables lossless behavior (DCB)
– e.g., exchange Ethernet priority values for FCoE and FIP
• FCoE virtual links should not be instantiated without DCBX


Ethernet Spanning Trees and FCoE
 Reminder: FCoE is Ethernet only, no IP routing
– Ethernet (layer 2) is bridged, not routed
 Spanning Tree Protocol (STP): Prevents (deadly) loops
– Elects a Root Switch, disables redundant paths
 Causes problems in large layer 2 networks
– No network multipathing
– Inefficient link utilization
Root Switch Si Si

Si Si Si Si Si


TRILL – Transparent Interconnection of
Lots of Links
 Layer 2 routing for Ethernet switches [IP: layer 3]
– IS-IS routing protocol for inter-switch Ethernet traffic
– Blocks Spanning Tree Protocol
 TRILL encapsulates Ethernet frames
– Not used with end systems (NICs)
– NICs: use link teaming/aggregation

Si Si

All links active 

Si Si Si Si Si


Ethernet Cabling Choices
Type /
Connector Cable 1Gb 10Gb 40/100Gb
Copper Cat6 or Most Some products Not
(10GBase-T) Cat6a existing on market, but supported
/ RJ-45 cabling not for FCoE (insufficient
(lots of yet. For 10Gb bandwidth)
Cat 5e) Ethernet:
Cat6 55m
Cat6a 100m

Optical OM2 Rare for Most backbone Expect shift
(multimode) (orange) Ethernet deployments to optical w/
/ LC OM3 are optical. 40/100Gb
(aqua) Standard
for FC OM2 82m OM3 100m
OM4
(aqua) OM3 300m OM4 125m
OM4 380m

Copper / Twinax N/A Low power Different
SFP+DA Think of short-
(direct 5-10m distance distance
as part of (Rack solution)
attach) option
connected (QSFP)
equipment


Agenda

• Protocols & Standards
• Server
Virtualization
• Conclusion


Live Virtual Machine Migration

Shared storage: Storage networking:
Move VM without
moving stored data C: Enabler of shared
storage


Storage Drivers and Server Virtualization

vNIC vSCSI vNIC vSCSI

virtual switch Hypervisor
Hypervisor driver

NIC FC NIC FC
HBA HBA

LAN traffic
iSCSI traffic FC traffic
*iSCSI initiator can also be in the VM
(Private Storage)


Storage Drivers and Server Virtualization


Hypervisor driver

NIC C FC NIC C FC
N HBA N HBA
A A
LAN traffic iSCSI traffic FCoE follows FC path

*iSCSI initiator can also be in the VM
(Private Storage)


Software FCoE and Server Virtualization

Not a problem for
iSCSI, NFS or CIFS
in a VM SW
FCoE
SW
FCoE

Virtual Switches in
ESX/ESXi
(including Cisco
Nexus 1000v) and virtual switch Hypervisor
Hypervisor driver
Hyper-V are not
Lossless (no DCB)

NIC FC NIC FC
HBA HBA

FCoE software in VMs would send traffic
through the virtual switch to the NICs


Software FCoE and Server Virtualization

SW SW
FCoE FCoE

Hypervisor driver
SW
FCoE works in FCoE

Hypervisor or CNA
(just not in a VM)
NIC FC NIC C FC
HBA N HBA
A
FCoE software in VMs would send traffic
through the virtual switch to the NICs


Agenda

• Conclusion


FCoE and iSCSI

FCoE iSCSI
Ethernet
FC expertise / install base No FC expertise needed
FC management Leverage
Layer 2 Ethernet Ethernet/IP expertise
Supports distance
Use FCIP for distance 10 Gigabit Ethernet connectivity (L3 IP routing)
Lossless Ethernet Strong virtualization affinity


iSCSI Deployment
 10 Gb iSCSI solutions are
available
– Traditional Ethernet (recover from
dropped packets using TCP) or
– Lossless Ethernet (DCB)
environment (TCP still used)

 iSCSI: natively routable (IP)
Ethernet
– Can use VLAN(s) to isolate traffic
iSCSI SAN
 iSCSI solutions: smaller scale
than FC
– Larger SANs: usually FC


Convergence: Server Phase
 Converged Network Switch at top of
rack or end of row
– Tightly controlled solution
– Server 10 GE adapters: CNA or NIC Ethernet LAN
 iSCSI and FCoE via Converged
Network Switch

Ethernet iSCSI
FC
Converged Network
Switch

FC Attach Fibre Channel SAN

1 Gb NICs FC HBAs
10 GbE CNAs
Storage

Rack Mount
Servers


Convergence: Network Phase
 Converged Network Switches move out of rack
 Maintains existing SAN and network
management Ethernet LAN

Overlapping admin domains may compel cultural adjustments

Ethernet Network
Ethernet (IP, FCoE) and CNS
Converged Network
FC Switch

Fibre Channel SAN

10 GbE CNAs
Storage

Rack Mount
Servers


Convergence at 10 Gigabit Ethernet
 Two paths to a Converged Network
– iSCSI: purely Ethernet
– FCoE: mix FC and Ethernet (or all Ethernet)
▪ FC compatibility now and in the future Ethernet LAN

 Choose (one or both) on scalability,
management, and skill set
Converged
Network
Ethernet Switch
FC iSCSI/FCoE
Storage

Fibre Channel
& FCoE attach
10 GbE CNAs
FC & FCoE
SAN

Rack Mount
Servers


EMC and Ethernet
 TechBooks (Google: “FCoE Tech Book”)
– Fibre Channel over Ethernet (FCoE) and Data Center
Bridging (DCB) Concepts and Protocols
– Fibre Channel over Ethernet (FCoE) and Data Center
Bridging (DCB) Case Studies
▪ Includes blade server case studies

 Services
– Design, Implementation, Performance and Security
offerings for networks

 Products
– Ethernet equipment for creating Converged Network
Environments


Agenda

• Conclusion


Summary
 Converged data centers can be built using 10Gb
Ethernet
– Continued use of FC and adoption of FCoE can be flexible
due to shared management
– iSCSI solutions work well for all IP/Ethernet networks
 10 Gigabit Ethernet solutions are maturing
– Active industry participation is creating standards that
allow solutions that can integrate into existing data centers
– FCoE and iSCSI will follow Ethernet roadmap to 40 and 100
Gigabits/sec
 Achieving a converged network: Consider
technology, processes/best practices and
organizational dynamics


Network Virtualization: Background
Benefits of Virtual Networks

Common network links with access
control properties of separate links. VLAN A VLAN B VLAN C
Manage virtual networks instead of
physical networks.
Virtual SANs provide similar
benefits for storage area networks.

VLAN Trunk
Virtual
Switch Switch
Networks

Each application (or VM) sees its
own virtual network,
independent of physical network


Network Virtualization: What’s new?
 Network version of DOS’s 640k memory limit
– Ethernet VLAN tag has only 12 bits!
 Not enough for large data centers
– Run any workload, anywhere?
– Configure every VLAN, everywhere!
 New approach: IP-based encapsulation
– Encapsulate Ethernet frames in IP
– Use IP routing (e.g., OSPF ECMP) to run network
– Hypervisor virtual switches can encapsulate for VMs
 Example encapsulations: VXLAN, NVGRE
– Initially: No DCB Ethernet support (so, no FCoE, initially)
– iSCSI, NFS, CIFS all work fine (all use TCP)
 Watch this space!
– E.g., IETF nvo3 (Network Virtualization Overlays) Working Group


Related Session and Resources
 FCoE - Topologies, Protocol, and Limitations
– Tuesday 10:00a & Wednesday 4:15p
 Birds of a Feather: The Future of Storage Networking
– Tuesday 1:30p
 Brocade: Storage Networking For the Virtual Enterprise
– Tuesday 4:15p
 FCoE in the EMC Support Matrix
– http://elabnavigator.emc.com
 EMC FCoE Videos: Search for “FCoE” on YouTube
 EMC FCoE Introduction whitepaper
– http://www.emc.com/collateral/hardware/white-papers/h5916-intro-to-
fcoe-wp.pdf
 FCoE Blog by Erik Smith (E-Lab)
– http://www.brasstacksblog.typepad.com


Q&A


Provide Feedback & Win!

 125 attendees will receive
$100 iTunes gift cards. To
enter the raffle, simply
complete:
– 5 sessions surveys
– The conference survey
 Download the EMC World
Conference App to learn
more: emcworld.com/app


Converged Data Center: FCoE, iSCSI and the Future of Storage Networking

Converged Data Center: FCoE, iSCSI and the Future of Storage Networking

Recomendados

Recomendados

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente

La actualidad más candente (18)

Destacado

Destacado (11)

Similar a Converged Data Center: FCoE, iSCSI and the Future of Storage Networking

Similar a Converged Data Center: FCoE, iSCSI and the Future of Storage Networking (20)

Más de EMC

Más de EMC (20)

Último

Último (20)

Converged Data Center: FCoE, iSCSI and the Future of Storage Networking