2. 1.
• Through having the right growth model it is advisable that
NO LC is growing a LOT at the same time in 2 ICX or 2
OGX Programmes because it is challenging to balance
resources
• What makes sense is that an LC grows in one ICX
Programme and one OGX Programme (Eg: iGIP and
oGCDP or iGCDP and oGIP)
• Do this for 2014 LC Goals as much as possible!
Consideration for MC Growth Model/OD Model
3. However, not every LC might have this kind of goal allocation
for the fruit peak!
So what should you do in the fruit peak as LC/MC in these 2
cases
High
growth/High
volume in both
ICX
High
growth/High
volume in
both OGX
5. 1. Identify common detractor issues/comments at REALIZED stage in
iGCDP and iGIP (MC and/or LC)
2. Find common solutions to issues that can be addressed together by
HR in GCDP and GIP to optimize the process (MC and LC)
3. MC to ensure implementation of solutions through the right planning
with LCs, ensuring the right synergy between structures, incentives,
L&D etc
Balance ICX Programmes
6. 1. Identify common detractor issues/comments at
REALIZED stage in iGCDP and iGIP (MC and/or
LC)
2. Find common solutions to issues that can be
addressed together by HR in GCDP and GIP to
optimize the process (MC and LC)
3. MC to ensure implementation of solutions
through the right planning with LCs, ensuring
the right synergy between structures, incentives,
L&D etc
Balance ICX Programmes
1.Common issues
- Accommodation
- EP Integration into host entity
- Logistics, mainly pick ups
7. 1. Identify common detractor issues/comments
at REALIZED stage in iGCDP and iGIP (MC
and/or LC)
2. Find common solutions to issues that can be
addressed together by HR in GCDP and GIP to
optimize the process (MC and LC)
3. MC to ensure implementation of solutions
through the right planning with LCs, ensuring
the right synergy between structures,
incentives, L&D etc
Balance ICX Programmes
2. Common solutions
• Effective synergy between delivery
members in iGIP and iGCDP team to work
on accommodation during or right after
the TN is matched
• The same members (members from both
iGCDP and iGIP) can work together on
logistics and pick up of Eps
• EP Integration (cultural aspect) can be
done together
• Outsourcing pick up support in case of
very very high number of Re only
8. 1. Identify common detractor issues/comments at
REALIZED stage in iGCDP and iGIP (MC and/or
LC)
2. Find common solutions to issues that can be
addressed together by HR in GCDP and GIP to
optimize the process (MC and LC)
3. MC to ensure implementation of solutions
through the right planning with LCs, ensuring
the right synergy between structures, incentives,
L&D etc
Balance ICX Programmes
3. MC Support in
implementation
• Talent Planning to know how
many people are needed for better
delivery
• Supporting LCs in capacity
creation in the summer for both
ICX Programme delivery
• Incentives to LCs to ensure high
quality through the process
9. 1. Identify common detractor issues/comments at
REALIZED stage in iGCDP and iGIP (MC and/or
LC)
2. Find common solutions to issues that can be
addressed together by HR in GCDP and GIP to
optimize the process (MC and LC)
3. MC to ensure implementation of solutions
through the right planning with LCs, ensuring
the right synergy between structures, incentives,
L&D etc
Balance ICX Programmes
3. MC Support in
implementation
• Synergy between the MCVP
iGCDP and MCVP iGIP with the
MCVP TM to make sure JD of
delivery members and structures
allow them to work together on
common elements like
accommodation etc
10. Example – SYNERGY IN MAY
LCLLC A is expecting 100 iGCDP and 50 iGIP Realizations between July 1st and July 20th
iGIP Team iGCDP Team
Synergy
MAY
• Meet to identify common issues and how to take it
forwards
• Start working together on accommodation of EPs –
find accommodation, create contracts, payment
conditions etc
11. Example – SYNERGY IN JUNE
LCLLC A is expecting 100 iGCDP and 50 iGIP Realizations between July 1st and July 20th
iGIP Team iGCDP Team
Synergy
JUNE
• Continue working on accommodation and other
logistics requirements
• Start working on virtual EP Preparation together for
Eps coming from the same country for GIP and GCDP
12. Example – SYNERGY IN JULY
LCLLC A is expecting 100 iGCDP and 50 iGIP Realizations between July 1st and July 20th
iGIP Team iGCDP Team
Synergy
JULY
• Involve LC in Trainee Pick ups
• Assign trainee buddies – no member has
more than 2 preferably
• Work together on EP registration etc
14. 1. Identify common detractor issues/comments at REALIZED stage in
iGCDP and iGIP (MC and/or LC)
2. Find common solutions to issues that can be addressed together by
HR in GCDP and GIP to optimize the process (MC and LC)
3. MC to ensure implementation of solutions through the right planning
with LCs, ensuring the right synergy between structures, incentives,
L&D etc
Balance OGX Programmes
15. 1. Identify common detractor
issues/comments at REALIZED stage in
iGCDP and iGIP (MC and/or LC)
2. Find common solutions to issues that can
be addressed together by HR in GCDP and
GIP to optimize the process (MC and LC)
3. MC to ensure implementation of
solutions through the right planning with
LCs, ensuring the right synergy between
structures, incentives, L&D etc
Balance OGX Programmes
1.Common issues
- Accommodation
- EP Integration into host entity
- Logistics
- AIESEC Support
16. 1. Identify common detractor
issues/comments at REALIZED stage in
oGCDP and oGIP (MC and/or LC)
2. Find common solutions to issues that
can be addressed together by HR in
GCDP and GIP to optimize the process
(MC and LC)
3. MC to ensure implementation of
solutions through the right planning
with LCs, ensuring the right synergy
between structures, incentives, L&D etc
Balance OGX Programmes
2. Common solutions
1. Effective synergy between delivery
members in oGIP and oGCDP for EP
PREPARATION for
Preparing EPs of GIP and GCDP going to
the same country – about the culture,
accommodation details, contact details in
host entity etc
Giving Eps insurance support
Ensuring Eps communicate with host
entity virtually
2. Coordinating and aligning with MC
expectation settings with host entity
17. 1. Identify common detractor
issues/comments at REALIZED stage in
oGCDP and oGIP (MC and/or LC)
2. Find common solutions to issues that can
be addressed together by HR in GCDP and
GIP to optimize the process (MC and LC)
3. MC to ensure implementation of
solutions through the right planning with
LCs, ensuring the right synergy between
structures, incentives, L&D etc
Balance OGX Programmes
2. Common solutions
• Marketing teams to be on top of clear
product and expectation settings in
both OGX Programmes
• Specific members in marketing
working for oGCDP and specific
members working for oGIP support
18. 1. Identify common detractor
issues/comments at REALIZED stage in
iGCDP and iGIP (MC and/or LC)
2. Find common solutions to issues that
can be addressed together by HR in
GCDP and GIP to optimize the process
(MC and LC)
3. MC to ensure implementation of
solutions through the right planning
with LCs, ensuring the right synergy
between structures, incentives, L&D etc
Balance OGX Programmes
3. MC Support in
implementation
• Talent Planning to know how
many people are needed for better
delivery in both OGX
Programmes and in marketing
• Supporting LCs in capacity
creation in the summer for both
OGX Programme delivery
• Incentives to LCs to ensure high
quality through the process
19. 1. Identify common detractor
issues/comments at REALIZED stage in
iGCDP and iGIP (MC and/or LC)
2. Find common solutions to issues that
can be addressed together by HR in
GCDP and GIP to optimize the process
(MC and LC)
3. MC to ensure implementation of
solutions through the right planning
with LCs, ensuring the right synergy
between structures, incentives, L&D etc
Balance OGX Programmes
3. MC Support in
implementation
• Synergy between the MCVP
oGCDP and MCVP oGIP with the
MCVP TM to make sure JD of
delivery members and structures
allow them to work together on
common detractor issues etc.