SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 6
Download to read offline
F U N D       F O R                O U R
                                       E C O N O M I C                        F U T U R E
                                       February 2010 Members Newsletter




                                       Venture Dollars Slow, But Still Flow

                                              The 2009 Venture Capital Report for the Cleveland Plus Region issued in
   Northeast Ohio by                   January found that between 2005 and 2009, $1.1 billion has been invested by venture
     the Numbers                       capitalists and angel investors in 183 unique companies in the region. In the last five
                                       years, these 183 Northeast Ohio companies have received 348 investments, contributing
                                       to Ohio’s 2009 ranking as a top ten state for investment deal activity.




125
                                              However, 2009 was a disappointing year for venture investment in the region,
                                       with only $99 million raised, compared to $260 million in 2008.
                                              Despite the overall drop in venture deals, investments in young companies
   Ohio companies will receive
                                       (described as seed stage investment) peaked in 2009, with 32 companies attracting
nearly $125 million in clean-energy
                                       investment.
     manufacturing tax credits
                                              “The fact that investment actually increased in seed stage companies in 2009
                                       is an indicator of the commitment of the region’s investors and the State of Ohio to




 41
                                       commercializing technologies,” says Ray Leach, CEO of JumpStart Inc. “Seed stage
                                       investors in the region are priming the pump for later stage investors, enabling them
      Cuyahoga County’s land
                                       to find competitive investment opportunities here.” Over the past five years, more than
 bank received nearly $41 million
                                       170 seed stage investments have been made.
 to demolish blighted homes and
         renovate others                      The Venture Capital Advisory Task Force that compiled the report is comprised
                                       of more than 40 investors in the Cleveland Plus region. The report is paid for by the




 4
                                       Fund for Our Economic Future.

        Collaborative efforts                                                     The 2009 Venture Capital Report for the Cleveland Plus™ Region
                                                                                                                                                                                                                For Policy Makers
    of four entities (the Global
                                                                Over $1 Billion of Venture Capital Invested in the last Five Years
Cardiovascular Innovation Center,                               has Created Thousands of Jobs, with Thousands More Projected.
                                                                                                                                                    Jobs Are Being Created at Every Stage of Growth
 Team NEO, the State of Ohio and                              Today: A Thriving Pipeline of Growing Companies                                       SEED  BSKLive is an IT company whose flagship product, StaffKnex, is a web-based application that
                                                                                                                                                          combines staff scheduling and other functions into an automated staff management system. The
the City of Akron) attracted Israeli                          $1.1 billion dollars have been invested by angel and venture capital investors in 183 unique Cleveland Plus regionentrepreneursince 2005*, raised $550,000 of seed funding in 2008,
                                                                                                                                                          company, led by serial companies Mark Woodka,
                                                              demonstrating that our region is starting and growing the innovative companies and large scale employers of our future. In 2009, during2009, and has grown its team to nine full time employees.
                                                                                                                                                          followed by a $1.3 million Series A round in a
                                                              year in which venture capital investing was down 38 percent nationally, our region saw seed stage investment at its highest level in the

   biomedical device company                                  region’s pipeline of growing companies.                                               EARLY
                                                              last four years. Over the past five years, more than 170 seed stage investments have beenMAR Systems’ process forthe Cleveland Plus and other metals from water has already proven
                                                                                                                                                           made, continuously filling removing mercury
                                                                                                                                                          over 100 times more effective than competitive methods. The company has grown due to seed
                                                              These investment dollars are funding companies in globally competitive, high tech industriesinvestment, followed by a $1 million Series A round in 2007, and a $1.5 million Series B round in
                                                                                                                                                            such as Healthcare, Cleantech, and IT.
     NI Medical Ltd. to Akron                                                                                                                             2009. With this funding, the company plans to grow its current seven-person team to 50 people in 2010.
                                                              EqUITY INVESTMENTS BY SECTOR
                                                              [$ Millions 2005-2009]                                       [2005-2009]              GROWTH
                                                                                                                           NUMBER OF COMPANIES BY SECTOR                       PartsSource is the nation’s only alternative parts aggregator for hospital equipment parts. The
                                                                                                                                                                               company is led by Air Force veteran Ray Dalton, currently employs over 200 people, and hires
                                                               Business & Consumer Products &                                 Business & Consumer                             an additional four to six people per month. The previously angel-backed company raised a $50
                                                                                                                                                                           Healthcare
                                                               Services & Agriculture                                         Products & Services
                                                                                                                              & Agriculture
                                                                                                                                                                               million growth capital round in 2008,n Information
                                                                                                                                                                                           Healthcare                and its revenues grew by 338% in 2009.
                                                               Information             136
                                                                                                                                                                                             n Healthcare Services,          Technology
                                                                                                                                                    EXIT
                                                                                                                                                 35            25              MemberHealth, a pharmacy benefits management company, grew rapidly and was acquired
                                                                                                                                                                                             Healthcare IT & Other
                                                               Technology                            261                                                                                                           n Business &
                                                                              112                                                                                       11     by UniversalnAmerican in 2007 for $630 million. Prior to the acquisition, MemberHealth
                                                                                                                                                                                             Biopharmaceuticals
                                                                                                                                                                                                                     Consumer
                                                                    4
                                                                                                                                                                                          n Medical Devices &        Products &
                                                                                                                                                                               employed 160 people; now, Universal American’s Cleveland office employs 250 and the
                                                                                                                                                                                             Equipment               Services &
                                                                             63                                                                                                company ranks 494 in the Fortune 500. Agriculture
                                                                                                                                                                        33
                                                                             48                                                             46
                                                                                                        206
                                                                                                                                                                                             Cleantech
                                                                                       262
                                                                                                                              Information           Tomorrow: $1.2 Billion in Venture Capital Will Be
                                                                                                                                                           18
                                                                                                                                                                               n Advanced
                                                                                                                              Technology               12                        Specialty Materials
                                                               Cleantech
                                                                                                                                                    Needed to Deliver Growth andChemicals
                                                                                                                                                                                 & Thousands More Jobs
                                                                                                                 Healthcare                                                                  n Energy
                                                                                                                                                 3The Venture Capital Advisory Task Force, comprised of over 40
                                                                                                                                                        Cleantech                    n Environmental
                                                                                                                                                  investors in the Cleveland Plus region, has determined that at
                                                                                                                                    least an additional $1.2 billion in private sector venture capital
                                                                                                                                    investment will be needed over the next five years to continue the
                                                                Today and Tomorrow: Thousands of Jobs Created                       growth of the companies in the pipeline and create thousands of
                                                                                                                                    additional jobs.
                                                                According to the National Venture Capital Association, a job is created for every $26,435 of private sector capital invested, which
                                                                equates to 40,700 jobs that have been and will be created from the $1.1 billion raised by Cleveland Plus companies in the last five
                                                                years. These jobs feed into an ecosystem of growth in the high tech sector in Northeast Ohio:
                                                                   •     Ohio is in the Top 10 for medical device jobs in the country and venture-backed Cleveland Plus area companies such as AxioMed
                                                                        Spine, CerviLenz, IMALUX, Orthohelix Surgical Designs, Synapse BioMedical, Trek Diagnostics, and ViewRay are the programs of the State of Ohio, some of which are currently pending
                                                                                                                                      Current investment incentives and funding types of
                                                                        firms that will continue to keep Ohio ranked highly.          approval in the state legislature, are critical to maintaining this projected flow of private sector venture capital




ffef
                                                                   •    Ohio has the 4th highest number of cleantech jobs in the country the venture-backed Cleveland Plus area companies such as
                                                                                                                                          into and Cleveland Plus region.
                                                                        Five Star Technologies, Logos Energy, MAR Systems, Ovation Polymers, rexorce Thermionics, and Sorbent Technologies are the
                                                                        types of firms that will keep Ohio standing strong on this front.     Ohio Third Frontier                   Technology Investment Tax Credit                                               The Ohio Capital Fund
                                                                   •   Ohio’s high tech employment has grown faster than almost all other Midwest states funded percent versus an averagetax credit is for taxpayers who
                                                                                                                                                                 Third Frontier has – 6.4 four pre-                       This of 4.3                              This fund provides capital to investment
                                                                       percent in other Midwest states. Nowhere is this more true than in the Cleveland Plus region.supported
                                                                                                                                                                 seed and seed funds and                                  invest in small, Ohio-based technology   funds to increase investing in Ohio
                                                                                                                                                                 the growth of over 800 innovative                        companies.                               companies.
                                                                                                                                                                 companies in the Cleveland Plus region                   Over $20 million in private sector       10 Cleveland Plus area investment funds
                                                              *Annual Equity Capital Raised by Cleveland Plus Area Companies: 2005: $259 million, 2006: $158 million, 2007:and indirectly. Statewide, it 2009: $99 millioncapital has been invested in over 200
                                                                                                                                                                 directly $317 million, 2008: $260 million,                                                        have received monies from which $64
                                                                                                                                                                 has catalyzed innovation and created                     Cleveland Plus area companies as a       million has been invested in Cleveland
                                                                                                                                                                 41,300 jobs already, with the potential                  result of the tax credit.                Plus area companies for their growth.
                                                                                                                                                                 to create thousands more.




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       Special thanks to the Fund for Our Economic Future for
                                                                                                                                                        www.jumpstartinc.org                  www.nortech.org                         www.bioenterprise.com            underwriting this report. www.futurefundneo.org




                                          February 2010 Members Newsletter
Northeast Ohio Health Care Startups
                                                Raise $66 Million in 2009

                                                       As part of its work to grow health care companies and commercialize bioscience
                                                technologies in Northeast Ohio, BioEnterprise closely monitors private investment
                                                across biotechnology, medical device and health care software and services – with a
                                                special focus on trends, financings and opinions in the Midwest region.
                                                       The organization’s latest Midwest Health Care Venture Investment Report found
                                                that health care startups in the Midwest attracted $780 million in new investments
                                                across 156 companies in 2009. Northeast Ohio accounted for $66.6 million of the new
   Northeast Ohio by
                                                investments across 21 companies – the third highest number of companies in
     the Numbers                                the Midwest.




 50
                                                       The total number of investments across the Midwest in 2009 is comparable to
                                                2008, but the funding level represents a 26% drop from 2008, reflecting a similar drop
                                                nationally in health care venture investing.
      San Francisco-based
Revere Data opened a Youngstown
                                                       “This was a difficult year for emerging health care ventures in the Midwest
     office and plans to hire                   and nationally,” said Baiju R. Shah, president & CEO of BioEnterprise. “The global
 50 employees within two years                  recession combined with the industry uncertainties related to U.S. health care reform
                                                dampened investment.”




123
                                                       The full Midwest Health Care Venture Investment Report is published yearly.
                                                Editions dating back to 2005 are available at www.bioenterprise.com.

    Business expansion projects                                                          News from



in Wayne County totaled more than                     Midwest Health Care Startups Raise $780 Million in 2009

      $123 million in 2009
                                                                     Minnesota Leading State

                                                  Cleveland, OH, January 29, 2010 – Midwest health care startups attracted $780 Million
                                                  in new investments across 156 companies in 2009 according to the BioEnterprise                                     Table: Midwest Health Care Venture Investment (By State)
                                                  Midwest Health Care Venture Investment Report.. While the total number of
                                                  investments is comparable to 2008, the funding level represents a 26% drop from 2008,
                                                                                                                                             State                     2009                    2008                        2007                   2006                       2005
                                                  reflecting a similar drop nationally in health care venture investing. Minnesota
                                                                                                                                                                        $       # of              $       # of             $       # of                      # of              $      # of
                                                  companies collectively attracted the most investment dollars within the Midwest.
                                                                                                                                                                Millions       Cos.       Millions       Cos.       Millions      Cos.     $ Millions       Cos.        Millions     Cos.




 70
                                                                                                                                             Illinois               38.9           8          97.3         13         125.5           7        101.6          12            39.2         7
                                                  “This was a difficult year for emerging health care ventures in the Midwest and
                                                  nationally,” said Baiju R. Shah, President & CEO of BioEnterprise, the Cleveland-based
                                                                                                                                             Indiana                76.3         14           75.4           7        135.6         10           37.2           8           23.1         4
                                                  biomedical venture developer. “The global recession combined with the industry             Iowa                   36.8           3            4.0          1             -          -             -           -              -         -
                                                  uncertainties related to U.S. health care reform dampened investment.”                     Kansas                   4.3          5          16.9           9          56.6          6             -           -              -         -
                                                                                                                                             Kentucky               97.3           7          19.2           6          32.0          4          51.4           4           19.3         2
                                                  By sector, the 2009 equity funding was allocated as follows:                               Michigan             102.2          14         105.0          12           56.2          5        135.5          11            52.9         8
     The Minority Business                           •   Medical device companies: $264 million (34%)                                        Minnesota            199.0
                                                                                                                                                                    65.8
                                                                                                                                                                                 23
                                                                                                                                                                                   8
                                                                                                                                                                                            318.9
                                                                                                                                                                                              50.2
                                                                                                                                                                                                           22
                                                                                                                                                                                                           11
                                                                                                                                                                                                                      296.1
                                                                                                                                                                                                                        69.6
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    25
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      7
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               233.9
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 39.2
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              22
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              10
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          151.0
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            71.9
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       18
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         9
                                                     •   Biopharmaceutical companies: $378 million (48%)                                     Missouri
 Accelerator 2.5+ has generated                      •   Health care software and service companies: $139 million (18%)                      Ohio
                                                                                                                                             Western
                                                                                                                                                                  105.4          40         189.1          43         295.5         44         113.9          39          185.4        18
                                                                                                                                                                    37.8         24         126.2           33           101.4      17            54.4        22            58.3       10
  $70 million in new deals for
                                                  “While the dollars to biotech companies are larger, the number of companies attracting     Pennsylvania
                                                  capital is balanced between biotech and medical devices,” Shah continued. “This            Wisconsin              16.2         10          48.5           8          56.2         12            25.2         7            39.3        6
                                                  reflects the industry balance in the Midwest as compared to the coasts.”                   Total                 780.0        156       1,050.5         165       1,224.7        137           792.3       135           640.4       82
    16 minority companies                         The Midwest Health Care Venture Investment Report includes all reported numbers and
                                                  regionally collected data. For complete state and region results across the Midwest, see                         Table: Midwest Health Care Venture Investment (By Region)**
                                                  the attached table. To view additional data about Midwest health care business activity
                                                  visit http://www.bioenterprise.com/reports/index.html.                                     Region                               2009                       2008                         2007                            2006
                                                                                                                                                                                            # of              $          # of                        # of                            # of
                                                                                               1
                                                                                                                                                                            $ Millions     Cos.       Millions          Cos.      $ Millions        Cos.            $ Millions      Cos.
                                                                                                                                             Chicago                              38.9         8          97.3            13          125.5             7               101.6         12
                                                                                                                                             Indianapolis                         41.2         9          73.0              6         113.6             8                 18.4          6
                                                                                                                                             West Lafayette                       28.2         3            2.5             1           22.0            2                 18.8          2
                                                                                                                                             Louisville                             2.5        4          13.4              3             6.2           2                 11.4          3
                                                                                                                                             Detroit-Ann Arbor                    68.8         7          89.0              8           56.2            5                 98.3          8
                                                                                                                                             SW Michigan                          14.5         5          16.0              2               -           -                   6.7         2
                                                                                                                                             Minneapolis                        199.0        23         318.9             22          296.1           25                233.9         22
                                                                                                                                             St. Louis                            27.8         7          47.2            10            57.6            6                 20.2          9
                                                                                                                                             Kansas City*                         42.3         6          19.9            10            68.6            7                 19.0          1
                                                                                                                                             Cincinnati*                        121.2          8          19.2              2           64.6          10                  13.6          4
                                                                                                                                             Cleveland                            66.3       21         163.5             31          241.8           28                  87.9        23
                                                                                                                                             Columbus                             12.4       13             6.4           10            14.2            7                 12.4        12
                                                                                                                                             Pittsburgh                           37.8       24         126.2             33          101.4           17                  54.4        22
                                                                                                                                             Wisconsin                            16.2       10           48.5              8           56.2          12                  25.2          7

                                                                                                                                             * Border MSAs such as Kansas City and Cincinnati include deals from both states in those geographies; deals are
                                                                                                                                             aggregated into state totals based on the MSA’s principal state

                                                                                                                                             **Regions’ totals do not equal states as not all areas are included in list of regions

                                                                                                                                             Sources: Compiled by BioEnterprise team from Venture Wire, Private Equity Week, Wall Street Journal, Venture Source,
                                                                                                                                             SEC Filings, company press releases, and www.biospace.com.




                                                                                                                                                                                                                    2




  Pg.   2


  1 4 2 2 E u c l i d A v e n u e , S u i t e 1 5 1 0 , C l e v e l a n d , O h i o 44115 • 2 1 6 . 9 2 5 . 4 9 0 0 • w w w . f u t u r e f u n d n e o . o r g
EfficientGovNow Engagement Meetings
                                     Sweep the Region

                                           Representatives from the Fund for Our Economic Future and Kent State
                                     University’s Center for Public Administration & Public Policy have been hitting the road
                                     across Northeast Ohio to encourage the public and government officials to participate
                                     in Round 2 of EfficientGovNow.
                                           Entities participating in recent and upcoming EfficientGovNow engagement
                                     meetings include:
  Northeast Ohio by                  Ashland Area Council for Economic Development
    the Numbers                      Ashland City Council




    45
                                     Ashtabula Growth Partnership
                                     Burton Middlefield Rotary
    Cleveland Clinic’s Global        Chagrin Valley Intergovernmental Council
Cardiovascular Innovation Center     City of Medina, Montville, Lafayette and York Townships
 has awarded $13 million to 45       Cleveland City Council Caucus
  companies in just two years
                                     First Suburbs Consortium
                                     Lorain County Community Alliance




    37
                                     Medina County Economic Development Corporation
       Northeast Ohio’s              Medina County Township Trustees Association
biomedical industry has grown by     Northeast Ohio Four County Regional Planning and Development Organization
37 percent in the last five years,   Northeast Ohio Trade & Economic Consortium
 outpacing the national average
                                     Portage County Township Trustee Association
                                     Richland County Regional Planning Commission
                                     Stark Development Board
                                     Tri County Municipal Clerks
                                     Western Reserve Municipal Clerks
                                             Similar meetings last year helped persuade 294 government entities, representing
                                     14 of Northeast Ohio’s 16 counties, and their partners to submit 65 project ideas to the
                                     first round of the competitive grants program. In the second round, the Fund hopes to
                                     attract even more project ideas from the region’s government officials, as well as entries
                                     from all 16 counties. The deadline for government officials to submit a project abstract
                                     for Round 2 of EfficientGovNow is February 26.
                                             Updates on the progress of engagement efforts, as well as details about the
                                     second round of EfficientGovNow, are available at www.efficientgovnow.org.




ffef                                    February 2010 Members Newsletter
                                                                                                                         Pg.   3
BioEnterprise and Team NEO Amp Up
                                                                                                               Biomedical Company Attraction

                                                                                                                       Northeast Ohio’s robust biomedical cluster is getting a shot in the arm from
                                                                                                               a collaboration between BioEnterprise and Team NEO. The two Fund grantees have
                                                                                                               been collaborating on a targeted marketing campaign to attract additional medical
                                                                                                               device companies to the 16-county Plus region.
                                                                                                                       Through an informative new Web site ( www.clevelandplusbiomedical.com ),
                                                                                                               ongoing national and trade media stories and targeted business development efforts,
                                                                                                               the initiative aims to:
                                                                                                                                                     >> Attract new businesses and jobs in core regional
       MEDICAL DEVICES
                                                                                                                                                     strengths: medical imaging, orthopedics, cardiovascular and
                                                                                                                                                     neurostimulation
                               Behind Cleveland’s                                                                                                    >> Promote Northeast Ohio’s biomedical cluster as an ideal
                                 BioMed Hub                                                                                                          location for medical device business growth because of the
                                                  Company executives credit their success
                                                    to the area’s deep pool of resources.
                                                                                                                                                     access to funding, talent, support entities, suppliers, customers
                                                                                                                                                     and collaborative partners, such as the Cleveland Clinic, Case
                   by MARK AREND                          velop the critical mass for
               m a r k . a r e n d @ c o n w a y. c o m   a sustainable biomedical
                                                          industry cluster,” says Peter




      C                                                                                                                                              Western Reserve University, Summa Health System, University
                                                          Gingras, president and
                 leveland’s aspirations of being          CEO of Proxy Biomedical,
                 a leading center of biomedi-             Inc., which makes bioma-


                                                                                                                                                     Hospitals and the Austen BioInnovation Institute in Akron
                 cal device manufacturing will            terials for the repair and
                 take a step forward when the             regeneration of tissue. “The
                 Medical Mart and Conven-                 development of the Euclid
      tion Center opens in 2013. A site on the            Corridor and the Medi-
      city’s downtown mall, chosen in January             cal Mart will help the city
      2009, will accommodate 120,000 sq.
      ft. (11,150 sq. m.) of permanent show-
      rooms, 300,000 sq. ft. (27,870 sq. m.) of
                                                          in attaining this critical
                                                          mass and lead to additional
                                                          growth,” he predicts. (The
                                                                                                                The offices of Quality
                                                                                                                Electrodynamics, led by
                                                                                                                                                     >> Increase the Plus region’s brand awareness and position
                                                                                                                                                     in core industries
      exhibit halls and 100,000 sq. ft. (9,290            Euclid Corridor is a trans-                           President and CEO Dr. Hiroyuki
                                                                                                                Fujita (left), have doubled
      sq. m.) of conference center space. The             portation project involving                           in staff every 18 months.
      center, being developed by MMPI —                   rapid transit and diesel-
      manager of Chicago’s Merchandise                    electric vehicles on Euclid
      Mart, among other properties — will                 Avenue.)
      bring together buyers and sellers of
      medical equipment and help showcase                 Catalysts for Growth
                                                                                                      initiative of the Cleveland Clinic, Uni-
                                                                                                      versity Hospitals, Case Western, Summa                 To date, the campaign has secured 15 national/trade media
      Cleveland’s substantial healthcare and                What’s already in place is just as        Health System and the BioInnovation
      biotech communities.
         “Cleveland is on the path to de-
                                                          important as what lies ahead. Two
                                                          organizations are behind much of the
                                                                                                      Institute in Akron that cultivates health-
                                                                                                      care companies and commercializes              placements, including stories in Expansion Solutions magazine,
                                                                        recent growth in the area’s   bioscience technologies.
                                                                        medical device and equip-
                                                                        ment sector — the Global
                                                                                                         “Access to funding is essential for
                                                                                                      biomed companies to grow,” says Gin-           Site Selection magazine and the Medical Device Daily technology
                                                                        Cardiovascular Innova-        gras. “GCIC and BioEnterprise, and the
                                                                        tion Center (GCIC) and
                                                                        BioEnterprise. GCIC is a
                                                                        US$250-million research
                                                                                                      connections to funding resources these
                                                                                                      organizations provide, demonstrate the
                                                                                                      area’s commitment to providing finan-
                                                                                                                                                     newspaper.
                                                                        and product development
                                                                        consortium founded in
                                                                        2007 with funding from
                                                                                                      cial resources that will help the cluster
                                                                                                      continue to grow.”
                                                                                                         Dr. Hiroyuki Fujita, president and
                                                                                                                                                             More information about the effort, as well as what makes
                                                                        Ohio’s Third Frontier Proj-
                                                                        ect. The Cleveland Clinic
                                                                        leads the effort with par-
                                                                                                      CEO of Quality Electrodynamics
                                                                                                      (QED), a maker of MRI RF coils for hu-
                                                                                                      man body imaging founded in Cleveland
                                                                                                                                                     Northeast Ohio an attractive biomedical hub, is available at
                                                                                                                                                     www.clevelandplusbiomedical.com.
                                                                        ticipation from Case West-    in 2005, concurs.
                                                                        ern Reserve University,          “The region will continue to grow,
      Peter Gingras (right), President                                  Ohio State University, the    because it provides biomedical compa-
      and CEO of Proxy Biomedical,                                      Universities of Toledo and    nies the resources necessary to thrive,”
      Inc., says development of the                                     Cincinnati and University     he says. In February 2009, QED moved
      Euclid Corridor and the new
                                                                        Hospitals of Cleveland.       from 3,000 sq. ft. (279 sq. m.) of space
      Medical Mart will help Cleveland
      achieve critical mass for the                                     GCIC has funded 45 com-       to a 27,000-sq.-ft. (2,500-sq.-m.) facility.
      biomedical industry.                                              panies thus far.              The company doubles its staff approxi-
                                                                           BioEnterprise is an        mately every 18 months and currently

      784   NOVEMBER 2009     SITE SELECTION




Pg.   4


1 4 2 2 E u c l i d A v e n u e , S u i t e 1 5 1 0 , C l e v e l a n d , O h i o 44115 • 2 1 6 . 9 2 5 . 4 9 0 0 • w w w . f u t u r e f u n d n e o . o r g
Report Indicates Northeast Ohio Benefits
                                     from Diversifying Industry

                                            Northeast Ohio is trending closer to the United States in this current recession
                                     than in the 1981 recession, according to the most recent edition of Team NEO’s
                                     quarterly Cleveland Plus Economic Review.
                                            Compared to the 1981 major recession in which Northeast Ohio significantly
                                     lagged behind the United States in employment and GRP, these indicators in the
                                     16-county region of Northeast Ohio are trending closer to national averages in this
  Northeast Ohio by                  recession.
    the Numbers                             The review indicates that this improvement is likely due to Northeast Ohio’s
                                     change in industry mix. Nearly 30% of the region’s GRP depended on the manufacturing




     25
                                     industry in 1981, compared with 12% today. The Cleveland Plus region’s economy
                                     is now more diversified, with increases in health care, headquarters, professional,
   Phycal, a JumpStart portfolio     scientific and technical services, and other industries.
  company creating algal biofuel,           More information and the complete report are available at
    was one of BusinessWeek’s        www.clevelandplusbusiness.com.
 “25 Most Intriguing Companies.”




     33
                                                                                                                                          December 2009 | Volume 3, Issue 4
                                                                                                                                                     Our partners include:
                                                                                                                                                           Greater Cleveland Partnership
                                                                                                                                                                  Greater Akron Chamber
                                                                                                                                                                Stark Development Board


    Thirty-three Northeast Ohio
                                                                                                                                                                      Team Lorain County




                                                                                                                                          The Cleveland Plus Economy
                                                                                                                                                   Youngstown-Warren Regional Chamber
                                                                                                                                        Medina County Economic Development Corporation                                                            ®
                                                                                                                                                  Growth Partnership of Ashtabula County


cleantech companies have received
venture or angel investment in the
                                                                                                                                          Through Two Recessions
                                                                                                                                          The U.S. has experienced two major recessions in                                                        Therefore, today it is important to know how
            last five years                                                                                                               the last 30 years: one beginning in 1981, and the                                                       we are doing in comparison – both to the 1981
                                                            Cleveland                                                                     current recession, which began in 2007. In the 1981                                                     recession and to the nation. To evaluate this,
                                                                                                                                          recession, the Cleveland Plus region saw much                                                           the following report looks at the Cleveland
                                                            Plus       ®

                                                                                                                                          greater declines in employment and Gross Regional                                                       Plus region’s performance through the first
                                                                                                                                          Product (GRP) than for the U.S. as a whole.                                                             seven quarters of each recession.
                                                            Economic
                                                            Review
                                                            December 2009
                                                            Volume 3, Issue 4                                                             Current                                                                                                                     NEO vs U.S. Employment
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      1981 vs. 2007 Recession

                                                                                                                                          Recession                                                                        +2%                                                                                                                                               +2%




                                       Diversifying Industries                                                                            Trending                                                                          0

                                                                                                                                                                                                                           -2%                                                                                                                        U.S. ‘81
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              0

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             -2%
                                                                                                                                                                                                               % Change




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  % Change
                                                                                                                                          Closer to U.S.                                                                   -4%                                                                                                                        U.S.‘07                -4%

                                       Positively Impacting                                                                                                                                                                -6%
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      NEO ‘07
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             -6%



                                       Cleveland Plus Economy: An indicator of regional
                                                                                                                                                                                                                           -8%                                                                                                                                               -8%
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      NEO ‘81
                                                                                                                                                                                                                          -10%                                                                                                                                               -10%
                                                               economic strength is the                                                                                                                                           Q3 in ‘81 vs.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   Q4 in ’07
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      Q4 in ‘81 vs.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       Q1 in ’08
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      Q1 in ‘82 vs.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       Q2 in ’08
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      Q2 in ‘82 vs.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       Q3 in ’08
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Q3 in ‘82 vs.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         Q4 in ’08
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         Q4 in ‘82 vs.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          Q1 in ’09
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             Q1 in ‘83 vs.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              Q2 in ’09
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    Q3 in ‘81 vs.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     Q4 in ’07
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    Q4 in ‘81 vs.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     Q1 in ’08
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    Q


                                       A Northeast Ohio View of the Global Recession of employment
                                                                              comparison                                                                                                                                              U.S. in ‘81                      NEO in ‘81                     U.S. in ‘07                   NEO in ‘07                                            U.S. in ‘81
                                                                                                                                         and GRP indexes. During the
                                                                                                                                         1981 recession, Cleveland Plus                                        > From 1981 to 2007,                                                                                  Source : Economy.com and Ohio LMI

                                                                                                                                         employment and GRP rate                                                 Employment has increased
                                       www.clevelandplusbusiness.com
                                                                                                                                         dropped more sharply than the                                           by nearly 100,000 individuals
                                                                                                                                         U.S. During the current recession,
                                                                                                                           NEO vs U.S. Employment and GRP are only
                                                                                                                                         employment                                                                                                                         NEO vs U.S. GRP
                                                                                                                           1981 vs. 2007 Recession                                                                                                                    1981 vs. 2007 Recession
                                                                                                                                         now approaching the decline
                                                                                                                                         experienced in 1981. And, the
                                                                                  +2%                                                                                                                                      +2%
                                                                                                                                         change in Cleveland Plus
                                                                                   0                                                                                                                                        0
                                                                                                                                         employment and GRP is                                                                                                                                                                                        U.S.‘81
                                                                                  -2%                                                                                                                                      -2%
                                                                                                                                         tracking much closer to the U.S.‘81
                                                                       % Change




                                                                                                                                                                                                                % Change




                                                                                                                                                                                   U.S.‘07                                                                                                                                                            U.S. ‘07
                                                                                  -4%
                                                                                                                                         changes for the U.S. In this                                                      -4%
                                                                                                                                                                                   NEO ‘07
                                                                                  -6%                                                    recession, Northeast Ohio                                                         -6%
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      NEO ’07
                                                                                  -8%                                                    is performing more in                                                             -8%                                                                                                                        NEO ‘81
                                                                                                                                                                                   NEO ‘81
                                                                                  -10%
                                                                                         Q3 in ‘81 vs.     Q4 in ‘81 vs.   Q1 in ‘82 vs.
                                                                                                                                         line ‘82 vs. the ‘82 vs. average. Q1 in ‘83 vs.
                                                                                                                                           Q2 in
                                                                                                                                                 with Q3 in U.S. Q4 in ‘82 vs.                                             -10%
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  Q3 in ‘81 vs.       Q4 in ‘81 vs.   Q1 in ‘82 vs.   Q2 in ‘82 vs.     Q3 in ‘82 vs.    Q4 in ‘82 vs.       Q1 in ‘83 vs.
                                                                                          Q4 in ’07         Q1 in ’08       Q2 in ’08         Q3 in ’08        Q4 in ’08        Q1 in ’09          Q2 in ’09                       Q4 in ’07           Q1 in ’08       Q2 in ’08       Q3 in ’08         Q4 in ’08        Q1 in ’09           Q2 in ’09

                                                                                             U.S. in ‘81                    NEO in ‘81                    U.S. in ‘07                       NEO in ‘07                                  U.S. in ‘81                      NEO in ‘81                    U.S. in ‘07                       NEO in ‘07

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    Source : Economy.com
                                                                                                                                                                                                               > From 1981 to 2007,
                                                                                                                                          All data are for seven quarters of each respective                     GRP has increased by almost $65 billion
                                                                                                                                          recession and does not project future performance.




ffef
                                                                                                                                             www.clevelandplusbusiness.com




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 Pg.           5

                                         February 2010 Members Newsletter
Broer to Join Leadership Team at
                                              Montessori High School

                                                      Members and friends of the Fund for Our Economic Future are widely familiar
                                              with the efforts of Weathertop Foundation’s Vikki Broer, who has been working as a
                                              consultant to the collaboration’s staff over the last three years.
                                                      She has raised the bar in the area of member relations, feedback and fundraising.
                                              Recently, a new opportunity to advance the goals of the region, namely in the area
                                              of talent development, piqued Vikki’s interest. Over the next couple months, she will
                                              transition into the position of dean of administration at the Montessori High School at
                                              University Circle.
                                                      In breaking the news of her new opportunity, Vikki shared the following reflections:
                                                     The Fund for Our Economic Future is one of the keys to the revitalization
                                              on Northeast Ohio. I am privileged to be part of this forward-thinking network of
                                              philanthropists. While I will continue with the Fund in a volunteer capacity, I will
                                              miss the supportive and collegial atmosphere of the Fund offices. The opportunity
                                              to work with all of our members was an experience in the pursuit of excellence. The
                                              vision and dedication of Fund members, Fund leadership and staff is overwhelming.
                                              The Fund “walks the walk,” creating a regional network that encourages collaboration,
                                              and creativity in solving the challenges of our region. In my new position, I will
                                              continue the spread the message of Advance Northeast Ohio, working on what
                                              matters across silos and across regional boundaries to ensure a bright future for
                                              Northeast Ohio.
                                                     The Fund looks forward to working with Vikki in a volunteer capacity, and wishes
                                              her the best in her new position. Brad Whitehead, president of the Fund, responded:
                                                      Vikki has been an extraordinary asset to the Fund over the last two years,
                                              leading our strategy process, facilitating the design of our committee structure,
                                              coordinating membership efforts and regularly reaching out to Fund members to
                                              determine how they might best contribute to our collaboration – and she has been
                                              a trusted counselor and friend to me as well. Vikki certainly represents philanthropy
                                              at its finest and we are thrilled that she will still be a part of the Fund even as she
                                              moves in new professional directions.



                                              Funders Committee 2010 Calendar
                                                      The first Phase 3 meeting of the Funders Committee of the Fund for Our
                                              Economic Future will be held on March 3 at the Intercontinental Hotel at the Cleveland
                                              Clinic, 9801 Carnegie Ave. The meeting will be held from 9 a.m. to noon.
                                                      The dates for the other Funders Committee meetings in 2010 are:

                                              • June 16 at the Davis Education & Visitor Center in Youngstown
                     2010                     • September 1 (location to be determined)
                                              • December 8 (location to be determined)
                                                    All Funders Committee meetings are from 9 a.m. to noon. If you have questions
                                              or suggestions for a Funders Committee location, please contact Angela Maldonado
                                              at 216-925-4900.
Pg.   6


1 4 2 2 E u c l i d A v e n u e , S u i t e 1 5 1 0 , C l e v e l a n d , O h i o 44115 • 2 1 6 . 9 2 5 . 4 9 0 0 • w w w . f u t u r e f u n d n e o . o r g

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

Fund April 2010 newsletter
Fund April 2010 newsletterFund April 2010 newsletter
Fund April 2010 newsletterfuturefundneo
 
March 2010 Newsletter
March 2010 NewsletterMarch 2010 Newsletter
March 2010 Newsletterfuturefundneo
 
April 2010 newsletter
April 2010 newsletterApril 2010 newsletter
April 2010 newsletterfuturefundneo
 
Brad Whitehead's presentation at NOACA's Annual Summit, 2010
Brad Whitehead's presentation at NOACA's Annual Summit, 2010Brad Whitehead's presentation at NOACA's Annual Summit, 2010
Brad Whitehead's presentation at NOACA's Annual Summit, 2010futurefundneo
 
October 2009 Fund Newsletter
October 2009 Fund NewsletterOctober 2009 Fund Newsletter
October 2009 Fund Newsletterfuturefundneo
 
Ceogc job leads jan 3 20122 (2)
Ceogc job leads jan 3  20122 (2)Ceogc job leads jan 3  20122 (2)
Ceogc job leads jan 3 20122 (2)Naz Robinson
 
Cross-Sector Collaboration Presentation-August 5, 2010
Cross-Sector Collaboration Presentation-August 5, 2010Cross-Sector Collaboration Presentation-August 5, 2010
Cross-Sector Collaboration Presentation-August 5, 2010futurefundneo
 

Viewers also liked (8)

Fund April 2010 newsletter
Fund April 2010 newsletterFund April 2010 newsletter
Fund April 2010 newsletter
 
March 2010 Newsletter
March 2010 NewsletterMarch 2010 Newsletter
March 2010 Newsletter
 
April 2010 newsletter
April 2010 newsletterApril 2010 newsletter
April 2010 newsletter
 
Brad Whitehead's presentation at NOACA's Annual Summit, 2010
Brad Whitehead's presentation at NOACA's Annual Summit, 2010Brad Whitehead's presentation at NOACA's Annual Summit, 2010
Brad Whitehead's presentation at NOACA's Annual Summit, 2010
 
Save by Sharing
Save by SharingSave by Sharing
Save by Sharing
 
October 2009 Fund Newsletter
October 2009 Fund NewsletterOctober 2009 Fund Newsletter
October 2009 Fund Newsletter
 
Ceogc job leads jan 3 20122 (2)
Ceogc job leads jan 3  20122 (2)Ceogc job leads jan 3  20122 (2)
Ceogc job leads jan 3 20122 (2)
 
Cross-Sector Collaboration Presentation-August 5, 2010
Cross-Sector Collaboration Presentation-August 5, 2010Cross-Sector Collaboration Presentation-August 5, 2010
Cross-Sector Collaboration Presentation-August 5, 2010
 

Similar to February 2010 Newsletter

Capital Risk & IT, The Perfect Connection?
Capital Risk & IT, The Perfect Connection?Capital Risk & IT, The Perfect Connection?
Capital Risk & IT, The Perfect Connection?senejug
 
Q410 qer singlepages
Q410 qer singlepagesQ410 qer singlepages
Q410 qer singlepagesTeam NEO
 
Q410 qer singlepages
Q410 qer singlepagesQ410 qer singlepages
Q410 qer singlepagesTeam NEO
 
agilent AR2003
agilent  AR2003agilent  AR2003
agilent AR2003finance38
 
Corporate VC Gains Strength
 	Corporate VC Gains Strength   	Corporate VC Gains Strength
Corporate VC Gains Strength mensa25
 
Safeguard Scientifics (NYSE: SFE) Investor Relations Presentation - January 2012
Safeguard Scientifics (NYSE: SFE) Investor Relations Presentation - January 2012Safeguard Scientifics (NYSE: SFE) Investor Relations Presentation - January 2012
Safeguard Scientifics (NYSE: SFE) Investor Relations Presentation - January 2012Safeguard Scientifics
 
Safeguard Scientifics (NYSE: SFE) Investor Relations Presentation - January 2012
Safeguard Scientifics (NYSE: SFE) Investor Relations Presentation - January 2012Safeguard Scientifics (NYSE: SFE) Investor Relations Presentation - January 2012
Safeguard Scientifics (NYSE: SFE) Investor Relations Presentation - January 2012Safeguard Scientifics
 
state street corp FINAL10K
state street corp FINAL10Kstate street corp FINAL10K
state street corp FINAL10Kfinance23
 
Safeguard Scientifics (NYSE: SFE) Investor Relations Presentation - April 2012
Safeguard Scientifics (NYSE: SFE) Investor Relations Presentation - April 2012Safeguard Scientifics (NYSE: SFE) Investor Relations Presentation - April 2012
Safeguard Scientifics (NYSE: SFE) Investor Relations Presentation - April 2012Safeguard Scientifics
 
Venture Investing Q4 '05 - MoneyTree Release
  	Venture Investing Q4 '05 - MoneyTree Release  	Venture Investing Q4 '05 - MoneyTree Release
Venture Investing Q4 '05 - MoneyTree Releasemensa25
 
eastman chemical annual reports 2004
eastman chemical  annual reports 2004eastman chemical  annual reports 2004
eastman chemical annual reports 2004finance31
 
Nuvo annual report_2010-11
Nuvo annual report_2010-11Nuvo annual report_2010-11
Nuvo annual report_2010-11msundesha
 
CloroxAR08_Letter
CloroxAR08_LetterCloroxAR08_Letter
CloroxAR08_Letterfinance48
 
Safeguard Scientifics (NYSE: SFE) Investor Relations Presentation - September...
Safeguard Scientifics (NYSE: SFE) Investor Relations Presentation - September...Safeguard Scientifics (NYSE: SFE) Investor Relations Presentation - September...
Safeguard Scientifics (NYSE: SFE) Investor Relations Presentation - September...Safeguard Scientifics
 
pitney bowes AR_2004
pitney bowes AR_2004pitney bowes AR_2004
pitney bowes AR_2004finance47
 
pitney bowes AR_2004
pitney bowes AR_2004pitney bowes AR_2004
pitney bowes AR_2004finance47
 
Endowments & Foundations 2011
Endowments & Foundations 2011Endowments & Foundations 2011
Endowments & Foundations 2011Aneil Luhan
 
Safeguard Scientifics (NYSE: SFE) Investor Relations Presentation - August 2012
Safeguard Scientifics (NYSE: SFE) Investor Relations Presentation - August 2012Safeguard Scientifics (NYSE: SFE) Investor Relations Presentation - August 2012
Safeguard Scientifics (NYSE: SFE) Investor Relations Presentation - August 2012Safeguard Scientifics
 

Similar to February 2010 Newsletter (20)

Capital Risk & IT, The Perfect Connection?
Capital Risk & IT, The Perfect Connection?Capital Risk & IT, The Perfect Connection?
Capital Risk & IT, The Perfect Connection?
 
Q410 qer singlepages
Q410 qer singlepagesQ410 qer singlepages
Q410 qer singlepages
 
Q410 qer singlepages
Q410 qer singlepagesQ410 qer singlepages
Q410 qer singlepages
 
agilent AR2003
agilent  AR2003agilent  AR2003
agilent AR2003
 
2009 Genesee Regional Chamber of Commerce Annual Report
2009 Genesee Regional Chamber of Commerce Annual Report2009 Genesee Regional Chamber of Commerce Annual Report
2009 Genesee Regional Chamber of Commerce Annual Report
 
Corporate VC Gains Strength
 	Corporate VC Gains Strength   	Corporate VC Gains Strength
Corporate VC Gains Strength
 
Safeguard Scientifics (NYSE: SFE) Investor Relations Presentation - January 2012
Safeguard Scientifics (NYSE: SFE) Investor Relations Presentation - January 2012Safeguard Scientifics (NYSE: SFE) Investor Relations Presentation - January 2012
Safeguard Scientifics (NYSE: SFE) Investor Relations Presentation - January 2012
 
Safeguard Scientifics (NYSE: SFE) Investor Relations Presentation - January 2012
Safeguard Scientifics (NYSE: SFE) Investor Relations Presentation - January 2012Safeguard Scientifics (NYSE: SFE) Investor Relations Presentation - January 2012
Safeguard Scientifics (NYSE: SFE) Investor Relations Presentation - January 2012
 
We 2012 workshop finance
We 2012 workshop   financeWe 2012 workshop   finance
We 2012 workshop finance
 
state street corp FINAL10K
state street corp FINAL10Kstate street corp FINAL10K
state street corp FINAL10K
 
Safeguard Scientifics (NYSE: SFE) Investor Relations Presentation - April 2012
Safeguard Scientifics (NYSE: SFE) Investor Relations Presentation - April 2012Safeguard Scientifics (NYSE: SFE) Investor Relations Presentation - April 2012
Safeguard Scientifics (NYSE: SFE) Investor Relations Presentation - April 2012
 
Venture Investing Q4 '05 - MoneyTree Release
  	Venture Investing Q4 '05 - MoneyTree Release  	Venture Investing Q4 '05 - MoneyTree Release
Venture Investing Q4 '05 - MoneyTree Release
 
eastman chemical annual reports 2004
eastman chemical  annual reports 2004eastman chemical  annual reports 2004
eastman chemical annual reports 2004
 
Nuvo annual report_2010-11
Nuvo annual report_2010-11Nuvo annual report_2010-11
Nuvo annual report_2010-11
 
CloroxAR08_Letter
CloroxAR08_LetterCloroxAR08_Letter
CloroxAR08_Letter
 
Safeguard Scientifics (NYSE: SFE) Investor Relations Presentation - September...
Safeguard Scientifics (NYSE: SFE) Investor Relations Presentation - September...Safeguard Scientifics (NYSE: SFE) Investor Relations Presentation - September...
Safeguard Scientifics (NYSE: SFE) Investor Relations Presentation - September...
 
pitney bowes AR_2004
pitney bowes AR_2004pitney bowes AR_2004
pitney bowes AR_2004
 
pitney bowes AR_2004
pitney bowes AR_2004pitney bowes AR_2004
pitney bowes AR_2004
 
Endowments & Foundations 2011
Endowments & Foundations 2011Endowments & Foundations 2011
Endowments & Foundations 2011
 
Safeguard Scientifics (NYSE: SFE) Investor Relations Presentation - August 2012
Safeguard Scientifics (NYSE: SFE) Investor Relations Presentation - August 2012Safeguard Scientifics (NYSE: SFE) Investor Relations Presentation - August 2012
Safeguard Scientifics (NYSE: SFE) Investor Relations Presentation - August 2012
 

Recently uploaded

Lucia Ferretti, Lead Business Designer; Matteo Meschini, Business Designer @T...
Lucia Ferretti, Lead Business Designer; Matteo Meschini, Business Designer @T...Lucia Ferretti, Lead Business Designer; Matteo Meschini, Business Designer @T...
Lucia Ferretti, Lead Business Designer; Matteo Meschini, Business Designer @T...Associazione Digital Days
 
WSMM Technology February.March Newsletter_vF.pdf
WSMM Technology February.March Newsletter_vF.pdfWSMM Technology February.March Newsletter_vF.pdf
WSMM Technology February.March Newsletter_vF.pdfJamesConcepcion7
 
digital marketing , introduction of digital marketing
digital marketing , introduction of digital marketingdigital marketing , introduction of digital marketing
digital marketing , introduction of digital marketingrajputmeenakshi733
 
Welding Electrode Making Machine By Deccan Dynamics
Welding Electrode Making Machine By Deccan DynamicsWelding Electrode Making Machine By Deccan Dynamics
Welding Electrode Making Machine By Deccan DynamicsIndiaMART InterMESH Limited
 
NAB Show Exhibitor List 2024 - Exhibitors Data
NAB Show Exhibitor List 2024 - Exhibitors DataNAB Show Exhibitor List 2024 - Exhibitors Data
NAB Show Exhibitor List 2024 - Exhibitors DataExhibitors Data
 
Go for Rakhi Bazaar and Pick the Latest Bhaiya Bhabhi Rakhi.pptx
Go for Rakhi Bazaar and Pick the Latest Bhaiya Bhabhi Rakhi.pptxGo for Rakhi Bazaar and Pick the Latest Bhaiya Bhabhi Rakhi.pptx
Go for Rakhi Bazaar and Pick the Latest Bhaiya Bhabhi Rakhi.pptxRakhi Bazaar
 
GUIDELINES ON USEFUL FORMS IN FREIGHT FORWARDING (F) Danny Diep Toh MBA.pdf
GUIDELINES ON USEFUL FORMS IN FREIGHT FORWARDING (F) Danny Diep Toh MBA.pdfGUIDELINES ON USEFUL FORMS IN FREIGHT FORWARDING (F) Danny Diep Toh MBA.pdf
GUIDELINES ON USEFUL FORMS IN FREIGHT FORWARDING (F) Danny Diep Toh MBA.pdfDanny Diep To
 
1911 Gold Corporate Presentation Apr 2024.pdf
1911 Gold Corporate Presentation Apr 2024.pdf1911 Gold Corporate Presentation Apr 2024.pdf
1911 Gold Corporate Presentation Apr 2024.pdfShaun Heinrichs
 
20220816-EthicsGrade_Scorecard-JP_Morgan_Chase-Q2-63_57.pdf
20220816-EthicsGrade_Scorecard-JP_Morgan_Chase-Q2-63_57.pdf20220816-EthicsGrade_Scorecard-JP_Morgan_Chase-Q2-63_57.pdf
20220816-EthicsGrade_Scorecard-JP_Morgan_Chase-Q2-63_57.pdfChris Skinner
 
Intermediate Accounting, Volume 2, 13th Canadian Edition by Donald E. Kieso t...
Intermediate Accounting, Volume 2, 13th Canadian Edition by Donald E. Kieso t...Intermediate Accounting, Volume 2, 13th Canadian Edition by Donald E. Kieso t...
Intermediate Accounting, Volume 2, 13th Canadian Edition by Donald E. Kieso t...ssuserf63bd7
 
TriStar Gold Corporate Presentation - April 2024
TriStar Gold Corporate Presentation - April 2024TriStar Gold Corporate Presentation - April 2024
TriStar Gold Corporate Presentation - April 2024Adnet Communications
 
1911 Gold Corporate Presentation Apr 2024.pdf
1911 Gold Corporate Presentation Apr 2024.pdf1911 Gold Corporate Presentation Apr 2024.pdf
1911 Gold Corporate Presentation Apr 2024.pdfShaun Heinrichs
 
The McKinsey 7S Framework: A Holistic Approach to Harmonizing All Parts of th...
The McKinsey 7S Framework: A Holistic Approach to Harmonizing All Parts of th...The McKinsey 7S Framework: A Holistic Approach to Harmonizing All Parts of th...
The McKinsey 7S Framework: A Holistic Approach to Harmonizing All Parts of th...Operational Excellence Consulting
 
Planetary and Vedic Yagyas Bring Positive Impacts in Life
Planetary and Vedic Yagyas Bring Positive Impacts in LifePlanetary and Vedic Yagyas Bring Positive Impacts in Life
Planetary and Vedic Yagyas Bring Positive Impacts in LifeBhavana Pujan Kendra
 
Healthcare Feb. & Mar. Healthcare Newsletter
Healthcare Feb. & Mar. Healthcare NewsletterHealthcare Feb. & Mar. Healthcare Newsletter
Healthcare Feb. & Mar. Healthcare NewsletterJamesConcepcion7
 
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.Anamaria Contreras
 
Introducing the Analogic framework for business planning applications
Introducing the Analogic framework for business planning applicationsIntroducing the Analogic framework for business planning applications
Introducing the Analogic framework for business planning applicationsKnowledgeSeed
 
Appkodes Tinder Clone Script with Customisable Solutions.pptx
Appkodes Tinder Clone Script with Customisable Solutions.pptxAppkodes Tinder Clone Script with Customisable Solutions.pptx
Appkodes Tinder Clone Script with Customisable Solutions.pptxappkodes
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Lucia Ferretti, Lead Business Designer; Matteo Meschini, Business Designer @T...
Lucia Ferretti, Lead Business Designer; Matteo Meschini, Business Designer @T...Lucia Ferretti, Lead Business Designer; Matteo Meschini, Business Designer @T...
Lucia Ferretti, Lead Business Designer; Matteo Meschini, Business Designer @T...
 
WSMM Technology February.March Newsletter_vF.pdf
WSMM Technology February.March Newsletter_vF.pdfWSMM Technology February.March Newsletter_vF.pdf
WSMM Technology February.March Newsletter_vF.pdf
 
digital marketing , introduction of digital marketing
digital marketing , introduction of digital marketingdigital marketing , introduction of digital marketing
digital marketing , introduction of digital marketing
 
Welding Electrode Making Machine By Deccan Dynamics
Welding Electrode Making Machine By Deccan DynamicsWelding Electrode Making Machine By Deccan Dynamics
Welding Electrode Making Machine By Deccan Dynamics
 
NAB Show Exhibitor List 2024 - Exhibitors Data
NAB Show Exhibitor List 2024 - Exhibitors DataNAB Show Exhibitor List 2024 - Exhibitors Data
NAB Show Exhibitor List 2024 - Exhibitors Data
 
Go for Rakhi Bazaar and Pick the Latest Bhaiya Bhabhi Rakhi.pptx
Go for Rakhi Bazaar and Pick the Latest Bhaiya Bhabhi Rakhi.pptxGo for Rakhi Bazaar and Pick the Latest Bhaiya Bhabhi Rakhi.pptx
Go for Rakhi Bazaar and Pick the Latest Bhaiya Bhabhi Rakhi.pptx
 
GUIDELINES ON USEFUL FORMS IN FREIGHT FORWARDING (F) Danny Diep Toh MBA.pdf
GUIDELINES ON USEFUL FORMS IN FREIGHT FORWARDING (F) Danny Diep Toh MBA.pdfGUIDELINES ON USEFUL FORMS IN FREIGHT FORWARDING (F) Danny Diep Toh MBA.pdf
GUIDELINES ON USEFUL FORMS IN FREIGHT FORWARDING (F) Danny Diep Toh MBA.pdf
 
1911 Gold Corporate Presentation Apr 2024.pdf
1911 Gold Corporate Presentation Apr 2024.pdf1911 Gold Corporate Presentation Apr 2024.pdf
1911 Gold Corporate Presentation Apr 2024.pdf
 
20220816-EthicsGrade_Scorecard-JP_Morgan_Chase-Q2-63_57.pdf
20220816-EthicsGrade_Scorecard-JP_Morgan_Chase-Q2-63_57.pdf20220816-EthicsGrade_Scorecard-JP_Morgan_Chase-Q2-63_57.pdf
20220816-EthicsGrade_Scorecard-JP_Morgan_Chase-Q2-63_57.pdf
 
Intermediate Accounting, Volume 2, 13th Canadian Edition by Donald E. Kieso t...
Intermediate Accounting, Volume 2, 13th Canadian Edition by Donald E. Kieso t...Intermediate Accounting, Volume 2, 13th Canadian Edition by Donald E. Kieso t...
Intermediate Accounting, Volume 2, 13th Canadian Edition by Donald E. Kieso t...
 
TriStar Gold Corporate Presentation - April 2024
TriStar Gold Corporate Presentation - April 2024TriStar Gold Corporate Presentation - April 2024
TriStar Gold Corporate Presentation - April 2024
 
1911 Gold Corporate Presentation Apr 2024.pdf
1911 Gold Corporate Presentation Apr 2024.pdf1911 Gold Corporate Presentation Apr 2024.pdf
1911 Gold Corporate Presentation Apr 2024.pdf
 
The Bizz Quiz-E-Summit-E-Cell-IITPatna.pptx
The Bizz Quiz-E-Summit-E-Cell-IITPatna.pptxThe Bizz Quiz-E-Summit-E-Cell-IITPatna.pptx
The Bizz Quiz-E-Summit-E-Cell-IITPatna.pptx
 
The McKinsey 7S Framework: A Holistic Approach to Harmonizing All Parts of th...
The McKinsey 7S Framework: A Holistic Approach to Harmonizing All Parts of th...The McKinsey 7S Framework: A Holistic Approach to Harmonizing All Parts of th...
The McKinsey 7S Framework: A Holistic Approach to Harmonizing All Parts of th...
 
Planetary and Vedic Yagyas Bring Positive Impacts in Life
Planetary and Vedic Yagyas Bring Positive Impacts in LifePlanetary and Vedic Yagyas Bring Positive Impacts in Life
Planetary and Vedic Yagyas Bring Positive Impacts in Life
 
Healthcare Feb. & Mar. Healthcare Newsletter
Healthcare Feb. & Mar. Healthcare NewsletterHealthcare Feb. & Mar. Healthcare Newsletter
Healthcare Feb. & Mar. Healthcare Newsletter
 
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.
 
Introducing the Analogic framework for business planning applications
Introducing the Analogic framework for business planning applicationsIntroducing the Analogic framework for business planning applications
Introducing the Analogic framework for business planning applications
 
WAM Corporate Presentation April 12 2024.pdf
WAM Corporate Presentation April 12 2024.pdfWAM Corporate Presentation April 12 2024.pdf
WAM Corporate Presentation April 12 2024.pdf
 
Appkodes Tinder Clone Script with Customisable Solutions.pptx
Appkodes Tinder Clone Script with Customisable Solutions.pptxAppkodes Tinder Clone Script with Customisable Solutions.pptx
Appkodes Tinder Clone Script with Customisable Solutions.pptx
 

February 2010 Newsletter

  • 1. F U N D F O R O U R E C O N O M I C F U T U R E February 2010 Members Newsletter Venture Dollars Slow, But Still Flow The 2009 Venture Capital Report for the Cleveland Plus Region issued in Northeast Ohio by January found that between 2005 and 2009, $1.1 billion has been invested by venture the Numbers capitalists and angel investors in 183 unique companies in the region. In the last five years, these 183 Northeast Ohio companies have received 348 investments, contributing to Ohio’s 2009 ranking as a top ten state for investment deal activity. 125 However, 2009 was a disappointing year for venture investment in the region, with only $99 million raised, compared to $260 million in 2008. Despite the overall drop in venture deals, investments in young companies Ohio companies will receive (described as seed stage investment) peaked in 2009, with 32 companies attracting nearly $125 million in clean-energy investment. manufacturing tax credits “The fact that investment actually increased in seed stage companies in 2009 is an indicator of the commitment of the region’s investors and the State of Ohio to 41 commercializing technologies,” says Ray Leach, CEO of JumpStart Inc. “Seed stage investors in the region are priming the pump for later stage investors, enabling them Cuyahoga County’s land to find competitive investment opportunities here.” Over the past five years, more than bank received nearly $41 million 170 seed stage investments have been made. to demolish blighted homes and renovate others The Venture Capital Advisory Task Force that compiled the report is comprised of more than 40 investors in the Cleveland Plus region. The report is paid for by the 4 Fund for Our Economic Future. Collaborative efforts The 2009 Venture Capital Report for the Cleveland Plus™ Region For Policy Makers of four entities (the Global Over $1 Billion of Venture Capital Invested in the last Five Years Cardiovascular Innovation Center, has Created Thousands of Jobs, with Thousands More Projected. Jobs Are Being Created at Every Stage of Growth Team NEO, the State of Ohio and Today: A Thriving Pipeline of Growing Companies SEED BSKLive is an IT company whose flagship product, StaffKnex, is a web-based application that combines staff scheduling and other functions into an automated staff management system. The the City of Akron) attracted Israeli $1.1 billion dollars have been invested by angel and venture capital investors in 183 unique Cleveland Plus regionentrepreneursince 2005*, raised $550,000 of seed funding in 2008, company, led by serial companies Mark Woodka, demonstrating that our region is starting and growing the innovative companies and large scale employers of our future. In 2009, during2009, and has grown its team to nine full time employees. followed by a $1.3 million Series A round in a year in which venture capital investing was down 38 percent nationally, our region saw seed stage investment at its highest level in the biomedical device company region’s pipeline of growing companies. EARLY last four years. Over the past five years, more than 170 seed stage investments have beenMAR Systems’ process forthe Cleveland Plus and other metals from water has already proven made, continuously filling removing mercury over 100 times more effective than competitive methods. The company has grown due to seed These investment dollars are funding companies in globally competitive, high tech industriesinvestment, followed by a $1 million Series A round in 2007, and a $1.5 million Series B round in such as Healthcare, Cleantech, and IT. NI Medical Ltd. to Akron 2009. With this funding, the company plans to grow its current seven-person team to 50 people in 2010. EqUITY INVESTMENTS BY SECTOR [$ Millions 2005-2009] [2005-2009] GROWTH NUMBER OF COMPANIES BY SECTOR PartsSource is the nation’s only alternative parts aggregator for hospital equipment parts. The company is led by Air Force veteran Ray Dalton, currently employs over 200 people, and hires Business & Consumer Products & Business & Consumer an additional four to six people per month. The previously angel-backed company raised a $50 Healthcare Services & Agriculture Products & Services & Agriculture million growth capital round in 2008,n Information Healthcare and its revenues grew by 338% in 2009. Information 136 n Healthcare Services, Technology EXIT 35 25 MemberHealth, a pharmacy benefits management company, grew rapidly and was acquired Healthcare IT & Other Technology 261 n Business & 112 11 by UniversalnAmerican in 2007 for $630 million. Prior to the acquisition, MemberHealth Biopharmaceuticals Consumer 4 n Medical Devices & Products & employed 160 people; now, Universal American’s Cleveland office employs 250 and the Equipment Services & 63 company ranks 494 in the Fortune 500. Agriculture 33 48 46 206 Cleantech 262 Information Tomorrow: $1.2 Billion in Venture Capital Will Be 18 n Advanced Technology 12 Specialty Materials Cleantech Needed to Deliver Growth andChemicals & Thousands More Jobs Healthcare n Energy 3The Venture Capital Advisory Task Force, comprised of over 40 Cleantech n Environmental investors in the Cleveland Plus region, has determined that at least an additional $1.2 billion in private sector venture capital investment will be needed over the next five years to continue the Today and Tomorrow: Thousands of Jobs Created growth of the companies in the pipeline and create thousands of additional jobs. According to the National Venture Capital Association, a job is created for every $26,435 of private sector capital invested, which equates to 40,700 jobs that have been and will be created from the $1.1 billion raised by Cleveland Plus companies in the last five years. These jobs feed into an ecosystem of growth in the high tech sector in Northeast Ohio: • Ohio is in the Top 10 for medical device jobs in the country and venture-backed Cleveland Plus area companies such as AxioMed Spine, CerviLenz, IMALUX, Orthohelix Surgical Designs, Synapse BioMedical, Trek Diagnostics, and ViewRay are the programs of the State of Ohio, some of which are currently pending Current investment incentives and funding types of firms that will continue to keep Ohio ranked highly. approval in the state legislature, are critical to maintaining this projected flow of private sector venture capital ffef • Ohio has the 4th highest number of cleantech jobs in the country the venture-backed Cleveland Plus area companies such as into and Cleveland Plus region. Five Star Technologies, Logos Energy, MAR Systems, Ovation Polymers, rexorce Thermionics, and Sorbent Technologies are the types of firms that will keep Ohio standing strong on this front. Ohio Third Frontier Technology Investment Tax Credit The Ohio Capital Fund • Ohio’s high tech employment has grown faster than almost all other Midwest states funded percent versus an averagetax credit is for taxpayers who Third Frontier has – 6.4 four pre- This of 4.3 This fund provides capital to investment percent in other Midwest states. Nowhere is this more true than in the Cleveland Plus region.supported seed and seed funds and invest in small, Ohio-based technology funds to increase investing in Ohio the growth of over 800 innovative companies. companies. companies in the Cleveland Plus region Over $20 million in private sector 10 Cleveland Plus area investment funds *Annual Equity Capital Raised by Cleveland Plus Area Companies: 2005: $259 million, 2006: $158 million, 2007:and indirectly. Statewide, it 2009: $99 millioncapital has been invested in over 200 directly $317 million, 2008: $260 million, have received monies from which $64 has catalyzed innovation and created Cleveland Plus area companies as a million has been invested in Cleveland 41,300 jobs already, with the potential result of the tax credit. Plus area companies for their growth. to create thousands more. Special thanks to the Fund for Our Economic Future for www.jumpstartinc.org www.nortech.org www.bioenterprise.com underwriting this report. www.futurefundneo.org February 2010 Members Newsletter
  • 2. Northeast Ohio Health Care Startups Raise $66 Million in 2009 As part of its work to grow health care companies and commercialize bioscience technologies in Northeast Ohio, BioEnterprise closely monitors private investment across biotechnology, medical device and health care software and services – with a special focus on trends, financings and opinions in the Midwest region. The organization’s latest Midwest Health Care Venture Investment Report found that health care startups in the Midwest attracted $780 million in new investments across 156 companies in 2009. Northeast Ohio accounted for $66.6 million of the new Northeast Ohio by investments across 21 companies – the third highest number of companies in the Numbers the Midwest. 50 The total number of investments across the Midwest in 2009 is comparable to 2008, but the funding level represents a 26% drop from 2008, reflecting a similar drop nationally in health care venture investing. San Francisco-based Revere Data opened a Youngstown “This was a difficult year for emerging health care ventures in the Midwest office and plans to hire and nationally,” said Baiju R. Shah, president & CEO of BioEnterprise. “The global 50 employees within two years recession combined with the industry uncertainties related to U.S. health care reform dampened investment.” 123 The full Midwest Health Care Venture Investment Report is published yearly. Editions dating back to 2005 are available at www.bioenterprise.com. Business expansion projects News from in Wayne County totaled more than Midwest Health Care Startups Raise $780 Million in 2009 $123 million in 2009 Minnesota Leading State Cleveland, OH, January 29, 2010 – Midwest health care startups attracted $780 Million in new investments across 156 companies in 2009 according to the BioEnterprise Table: Midwest Health Care Venture Investment (By State) Midwest Health Care Venture Investment Report.. While the total number of investments is comparable to 2008, the funding level represents a 26% drop from 2008, State 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 reflecting a similar drop nationally in health care venture investing. Minnesota $ # of $ # of $ # of # of $ # of companies collectively attracted the most investment dollars within the Midwest. Millions Cos. Millions Cos. Millions Cos. $ Millions Cos. Millions Cos. 70 Illinois 38.9 8 97.3 13 125.5 7 101.6 12 39.2 7 “This was a difficult year for emerging health care ventures in the Midwest and nationally,” said Baiju R. Shah, President & CEO of BioEnterprise, the Cleveland-based Indiana 76.3 14 75.4 7 135.6 10 37.2 8 23.1 4 biomedical venture developer. “The global recession combined with the industry Iowa 36.8 3 4.0 1 - - - - - - uncertainties related to U.S. health care reform dampened investment.” Kansas 4.3 5 16.9 9 56.6 6 - - - - Kentucky 97.3 7 19.2 6 32.0 4 51.4 4 19.3 2 By sector, the 2009 equity funding was allocated as follows: Michigan 102.2 14 105.0 12 56.2 5 135.5 11 52.9 8 The Minority Business • Medical device companies: $264 million (34%) Minnesota 199.0 65.8 23 8 318.9 50.2 22 11 296.1 69.6 25 7 233.9 39.2 22 10 151.0 71.9 18 9 • Biopharmaceutical companies: $378 million (48%) Missouri Accelerator 2.5+ has generated • Health care software and service companies: $139 million (18%) Ohio Western 105.4 40 189.1 43 295.5 44 113.9 39 185.4 18 37.8 24 126.2 33 101.4 17 54.4 22 58.3 10 $70 million in new deals for “While the dollars to biotech companies are larger, the number of companies attracting Pennsylvania capital is balanced between biotech and medical devices,” Shah continued. “This Wisconsin 16.2 10 48.5 8 56.2 12 25.2 7 39.3 6 reflects the industry balance in the Midwest as compared to the coasts.” Total 780.0 156 1,050.5 165 1,224.7 137 792.3 135 640.4 82 16 minority companies The Midwest Health Care Venture Investment Report includes all reported numbers and regionally collected data. For complete state and region results across the Midwest, see Table: Midwest Health Care Venture Investment (By Region)** the attached table. To view additional data about Midwest health care business activity visit http://www.bioenterprise.com/reports/index.html. Region 2009 2008 2007 2006 # of $ # of # of # of 1 $ Millions Cos. Millions Cos. $ Millions Cos. $ Millions Cos. Chicago 38.9 8 97.3 13 125.5 7 101.6 12 Indianapolis 41.2 9 73.0 6 113.6 8 18.4 6 West Lafayette 28.2 3 2.5 1 22.0 2 18.8 2 Louisville 2.5 4 13.4 3 6.2 2 11.4 3 Detroit-Ann Arbor 68.8 7 89.0 8 56.2 5 98.3 8 SW Michigan 14.5 5 16.0 2 - - 6.7 2 Minneapolis 199.0 23 318.9 22 296.1 25 233.9 22 St. Louis 27.8 7 47.2 10 57.6 6 20.2 9 Kansas City* 42.3 6 19.9 10 68.6 7 19.0 1 Cincinnati* 121.2 8 19.2 2 64.6 10 13.6 4 Cleveland 66.3 21 163.5 31 241.8 28 87.9 23 Columbus 12.4 13 6.4 10 14.2 7 12.4 12 Pittsburgh 37.8 24 126.2 33 101.4 17 54.4 22 Wisconsin 16.2 10 48.5 8 56.2 12 25.2 7 * Border MSAs such as Kansas City and Cincinnati include deals from both states in those geographies; deals are aggregated into state totals based on the MSA’s principal state **Regions’ totals do not equal states as not all areas are included in list of regions Sources: Compiled by BioEnterprise team from Venture Wire, Private Equity Week, Wall Street Journal, Venture Source, SEC Filings, company press releases, and www.biospace.com. 2 Pg. 2 1 4 2 2 E u c l i d A v e n u e , S u i t e 1 5 1 0 , C l e v e l a n d , O h i o 44115 • 2 1 6 . 9 2 5 . 4 9 0 0 • w w w . f u t u r e f u n d n e o . o r g
  • 3. EfficientGovNow Engagement Meetings Sweep the Region Representatives from the Fund for Our Economic Future and Kent State University’s Center for Public Administration & Public Policy have been hitting the road across Northeast Ohio to encourage the public and government officials to participate in Round 2 of EfficientGovNow. Entities participating in recent and upcoming EfficientGovNow engagement meetings include: Northeast Ohio by Ashland Area Council for Economic Development the Numbers Ashland City Council 45 Ashtabula Growth Partnership Burton Middlefield Rotary Cleveland Clinic’s Global Chagrin Valley Intergovernmental Council Cardiovascular Innovation Center City of Medina, Montville, Lafayette and York Townships has awarded $13 million to 45 Cleveland City Council Caucus companies in just two years First Suburbs Consortium Lorain County Community Alliance 37 Medina County Economic Development Corporation Northeast Ohio’s Medina County Township Trustees Association biomedical industry has grown by Northeast Ohio Four County Regional Planning and Development Organization 37 percent in the last five years, Northeast Ohio Trade & Economic Consortium outpacing the national average Portage County Township Trustee Association Richland County Regional Planning Commission Stark Development Board Tri County Municipal Clerks Western Reserve Municipal Clerks Similar meetings last year helped persuade 294 government entities, representing 14 of Northeast Ohio’s 16 counties, and their partners to submit 65 project ideas to the first round of the competitive grants program. In the second round, the Fund hopes to attract even more project ideas from the region’s government officials, as well as entries from all 16 counties. The deadline for government officials to submit a project abstract for Round 2 of EfficientGovNow is February 26. Updates on the progress of engagement efforts, as well as details about the second round of EfficientGovNow, are available at www.efficientgovnow.org. ffef February 2010 Members Newsletter Pg. 3
  • 4. BioEnterprise and Team NEO Amp Up Biomedical Company Attraction Northeast Ohio’s robust biomedical cluster is getting a shot in the arm from a collaboration between BioEnterprise and Team NEO. The two Fund grantees have been collaborating on a targeted marketing campaign to attract additional medical device companies to the 16-county Plus region. Through an informative new Web site ( www.clevelandplusbiomedical.com ), ongoing national and trade media stories and targeted business development efforts, the initiative aims to: >> Attract new businesses and jobs in core regional MEDICAL DEVICES strengths: medical imaging, orthopedics, cardiovascular and neurostimulation Behind Cleveland’s >> Promote Northeast Ohio’s biomedical cluster as an ideal BioMed Hub location for medical device business growth because of the Company executives credit their success to the area’s deep pool of resources. access to funding, talent, support entities, suppliers, customers and collaborative partners, such as the Cleveland Clinic, Case by MARK AREND velop the critical mass for m a r k . a r e n d @ c o n w a y. c o m a sustainable biomedical industry cluster,” says Peter C Western Reserve University, Summa Health System, University Gingras, president and leveland’s aspirations of being CEO of Proxy Biomedical, a leading center of biomedi- Inc., which makes bioma- Hospitals and the Austen BioInnovation Institute in Akron cal device manufacturing will terials for the repair and take a step forward when the regeneration of tissue. “The Medical Mart and Conven- development of the Euclid tion Center opens in 2013. A site on the Corridor and the Medi- city’s downtown mall, chosen in January cal Mart will help the city 2009, will accommodate 120,000 sq. ft. (11,150 sq. m.) of permanent show- rooms, 300,000 sq. ft. (27,870 sq. m.) of in attaining this critical mass and lead to additional growth,” he predicts. (The The offices of Quality Electrodynamics, led by >> Increase the Plus region’s brand awareness and position in core industries exhibit halls and 100,000 sq. ft. (9,290 Euclid Corridor is a trans- President and CEO Dr. Hiroyuki Fujita (left), have doubled sq. m.) of conference center space. The portation project involving in staff every 18 months. center, being developed by MMPI — rapid transit and diesel- manager of Chicago’s Merchandise electric vehicles on Euclid Mart, among other properties — will Avenue.) bring together buyers and sellers of medical equipment and help showcase Catalysts for Growth initiative of the Cleveland Clinic, Uni- versity Hospitals, Case Western, Summa To date, the campaign has secured 15 national/trade media Cleveland’s substantial healthcare and What’s already in place is just as Health System and the BioInnovation biotech communities. “Cleveland is on the path to de- important as what lies ahead. Two organizations are behind much of the Institute in Akron that cultivates health- care companies and commercializes placements, including stories in Expansion Solutions magazine, recent growth in the area’s bioscience technologies. medical device and equip- ment sector — the Global “Access to funding is essential for biomed companies to grow,” says Gin- Site Selection magazine and the Medical Device Daily technology Cardiovascular Innova- gras. “GCIC and BioEnterprise, and the tion Center (GCIC) and BioEnterprise. GCIC is a US$250-million research connections to funding resources these organizations provide, demonstrate the area’s commitment to providing finan- newspaper. and product development consortium founded in 2007 with funding from cial resources that will help the cluster continue to grow.” Dr. Hiroyuki Fujita, president and More information about the effort, as well as what makes Ohio’s Third Frontier Proj- ect. The Cleveland Clinic leads the effort with par- CEO of Quality Electrodynamics (QED), a maker of MRI RF coils for hu- man body imaging founded in Cleveland Northeast Ohio an attractive biomedical hub, is available at www.clevelandplusbiomedical.com. ticipation from Case West- in 2005, concurs. ern Reserve University, “The region will continue to grow, Peter Gingras (right), President Ohio State University, the because it provides biomedical compa- and CEO of Proxy Biomedical, Universities of Toledo and nies the resources necessary to thrive,” Inc., says development of the Cincinnati and University he says. In February 2009, QED moved Euclid Corridor and the new Hospitals of Cleveland. from 3,000 sq. ft. (279 sq. m.) of space Medical Mart will help Cleveland achieve critical mass for the GCIC has funded 45 com- to a 27,000-sq.-ft. (2,500-sq.-m.) facility. biomedical industry. panies thus far. The company doubles its staff approxi- BioEnterprise is an mately every 18 months and currently 784 NOVEMBER 2009 SITE SELECTION Pg. 4 1 4 2 2 E u c l i d A v e n u e , S u i t e 1 5 1 0 , C l e v e l a n d , O h i o 44115 • 2 1 6 . 9 2 5 . 4 9 0 0 • w w w . f u t u r e f u n d n e o . o r g
  • 5. Report Indicates Northeast Ohio Benefits from Diversifying Industry Northeast Ohio is trending closer to the United States in this current recession than in the 1981 recession, according to the most recent edition of Team NEO’s quarterly Cleveland Plus Economic Review. Compared to the 1981 major recession in which Northeast Ohio significantly lagged behind the United States in employment and GRP, these indicators in the 16-county region of Northeast Ohio are trending closer to national averages in this Northeast Ohio by recession. the Numbers The review indicates that this improvement is likely due to Northeast Ohio’s change in industry mix. Nearly 30% of the region’s GRP depended on the manufacturing 25 industry in 1981, compared with 12% today. The Cleveland Plus region’s economy is now more diversified, with increases in health care, headquarters, professional, Phycal, a JumpStart portfolio scientific and technical services, and other industries. company creating algal biofuel, More information and the complete report are available at was one of BusinessWeek’s www.clevelandplusbusiness.com. “25 Most Intriguing Companies.” 33 December 2009 | Volume 3, Issue 4 Our partners include: Greater Cleveland Partnership Greater Akron Chamber Stark Development Board Thirty-three Northeast Ohio Team Lorain County The Cleveland Plus Economy Youngstown-Warren Regional Chamber Medina County Economic Development Corporation ® Growth Partnership of Ashtabula County cleantech companies have received venture or angel investment in the Through Two Recessions The U.S. has experienced two major recessions in Therefore, today it is important to know how last five years the last 30 years: one beginning in 1981, and the we are doing in comparison – both to the 1981 Cleveland current recession, which began in 2007. In the 1981 recession and to the nation. To evaluate this, recession, the Cleveland Plus region saw much the following report looks at the Cleveland Plus ® greater declines in employment and Gross Regional Plus region’s performance through the first Product (GRP) than for the U.S. as a whole. seven quarters of each recession. Economic Review December 2009 Volume 3, Issue 4 Current NEO vs U.S. Employment 1981 vs. 2007 Recession Recession +2% +2% Diversifying Industries Trending 0 -2% U.S. ‘81 0 -2% % Change % Change Closer to U.S. -4% U.S.‘07 -4% Positively Impacting -6% NEO ‘07 -6% Cleveland Plus Economy: An indicator of regional -8% -8% NEO ‘81 -10% -10% economic strength is the Q3 in ‘81 vs. Q4 in ’07 Q4 in ‘81 vs. Q1 in ’08 Q1 in ‘82 vs. Q2 in ’08 Q2 in ‘82 vs. Q3 in ’08 Q3 in ‘82 vs. Q4 in ’08 Q4 in ‘82 vs. Q1 in ’09 Q1 in ‘83 vs. Q2 in ’09 Q3 in ‘81 vs. Q4 in ’07 Q4 in ‘81 vs. Q1 in ’08 Q A Northeast Ohio View of the Global Recession of employment comparison U.S. in ‘81 NEO in ‘81 U.S. in ‘07 NEO in ‘07 U.S. in ‘81 and GRP indexes. During the 1981 recession, Cleveland Plus > From 1981 to 2007, Source : Economy.com and Ohio LMI employment and GRP rate Employment has increased www.clevelandplusbusiness.com dropped more sharply than the by nearly 100,000 individuals U.S. During the current recession, NEO vs U.S. Employment and GRP are only employment NEO vs U.S. GRP 1981 vs. 2007 Recession 1981 vs. 2007 Recession now approaching the decline experienced in 1981. And, the +2% +2% change in Cleveland Plus 0 0 employment and GRP is U.S.‘81 -2% -2% tracking much closer to the U.S.‘81 % Change % Change U.S.‘07 U.S. ‘07 -4% changes for the U.S. In this -4% NEO ‘07 -6% recession, Northeast Ohio -6% NEO ’07 -8% is performing more in -8% NEO ‘81 NEO ‘81 -10% Q3 in ‘81 vs. Q4 in ‘81 vs. Q1 in ‘82 vs. line ‘82 vs. the ‘82 vs. average. Q1 in ‘83 vs. Q2 in with Q3 in U.S. Q4 in ‘82 vs. -10% Q3 in ‘81 vs. Q4 in ‘81 vs. Q1 in ‘82 vs. Q2 in ‘82 vs. Q3 in ‘82 vs. Q4 in ‘82 vs. Q1 in ‘83 vs. Q4 in ’07 Q1 in ’08 Q2 in ’08 Q3 in ’08 Q4 in ’08 Q1 in ’09 Q2 in ’09 Q4 in ’07 Q1 in ’08 Q2 in ’08 Q3 in ’08 Q4 in ’08 Q1 in ’09 Q2 in ’09 U.S. in ‘81 NEO in ‘81 U.S. in ‘07 NEO in ‘07 U.S. in ‘81 NEO in ‘81 U.S. in ‘07 NEO in ‘07 Source : Economy.com > From 1981 to 2007, All data are for seven quarters of each respective GRP has increased by almost $65 billion recession and does not project future performance. ffef www.clevelandplusbusiness.com Pg. 5 February 2010 Members Newsletter
  • 6. Broer to Join Leadership Team at Montessori High School Members and friends of the Fund for Our Economic Future are widely familiar with the efforts of Weathertop Foundation’s Vikki Broer, who has been working as a consultant to the collaboration’s staff over the last three years. She has raised the bar in the area of member relations, feedback and fundraising. Recently, a new opportunity to advance the goals of the region, namely in the area of talent development, piqued Vikki’s interest. Over the next couple months, she will transition into the position of dean of administration at the Montessori High School at University Circle. In breaking the news of her new opportunity, Vikki shared the following reflections: The Fund for Our Economic Future is one of the keys to the revitalization on Northeast Ohio. I am privileged to be part of this forward-thinking network of philanthropists. While I will continue with the Fund in a volunteer capacity, I will miss the supportive and collegial atmosphere of the Fund offices. The opportunity to work with all of our members was an experience in the pursuit of excellence. The vision and dedication of Fund members, Fund leadership and staff is overwhelming. The Fund “walks the walk,” creating a regional network that encourages collaboration, and creativity in solving the challenges of our region. In my new position, I will continue the spread the message of Advance Northeast Ohio, working on what matters across silos and across regional boundaries to ensure a bright future for Northeast Ohio. The Fund looks forward to working with Vikki in a volunteer capacity, and wishes her the best in her new position. Brad Whitehead, president of the Fund, responded: Vikki has been an extraordinary asset to the Fund over the last two years, leading our strategy process, facilitating the design of our committee structure, coordinating membership efforts and regularly reaching out to Fund members to determine how they might best contribute to our collaboration – and she has been a trusted counselor and friend to me as well. Vikki certainly represents philanthropy at its finest and we are thrilled that she will still be a part of the Fund even as she moves in new professional directions. Funders Committee 2010 Calendar The first Phase 3 meeting of the Funders Committee of the Fund for Our Economic Future will be held on March 3 at the Intercontinental Hotel at the Cleveland Clinic, 9801 Carnegie Ave. The meeting will be held from 9 a.m. to noon. The dates for the other Funders Committee meetings in 2010 are: • June 16 at the Davis Education & Visitor Center in Youngstown 2010 • September 1 (location to be determined) • December 8 (location to be determined) All Funders Committee meetings are from 9 a.m. to noon. If you have questions or suggestions for a Funders Committee location, please contact Angela Maldonado at 216-925-4900. Pg. 6 1 4 2 2 E u c l i d A v e n u e , S u i t e 1 5 1 0 , C l e v e l a n d , O h i o 44115 • 2 1 6 . 9 2 5 . 4 9 0 0 • w w w . f u t u r e f u n d n e o . o r g