SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 1
1

2

3

4

The task is
incomplete and/or
it is apparent that
little effort went
into the
development of the
task.

At least two areas
of the task were
not addressed. The
plan followed by
the teacher
demonstrated a
moderate level of
thought.

At least one area
of the task was
not addressed. The
plan followed by
the teacher
demonstrated a
great deal of
thought.

All areas of the
task were
addressed and
handled with a
high degree of
sophistication. The
plan followed by
the teacher
demonstrated a
great deal of
thought.

Task

All activities were
NOT completed

Only a few
activities were
completed or most
were partially
completed.

Most activities
were fully
completed or all
activities were
partially
completed.

All activities were
fully completed.

Process: Activities

There were no
original ideas
expressed in this
project.

The ideas
expressed by the
body of work
demonstrate a low
degree of
originality.

The ideas
expressed by the
body of work are
mostly original.
The group may
have improved
upon a previous
idea.

The ideas
expressed by the
body of work
demonstrate a high
degree of
originality.

Process:
Originality

The final body of
work had major
grammar, spelling,
and formatting
errors.

The final body of
work had 3-5
grammar, spelling,
and formatting
errors.

The final body of
work had 1 error
related to either
grammar, spelling,
and formatting
errors.

The final body of
work was free of
grammar, spelling,
and formatting
errors.

Grammar, format,
and spelling

TOTAL---------->

Más contenido relacionado

Similar a Rubric

Webquest rubrics(1)
Webquest rubrics(1)Webquest rubrics(1)
Webquest rubrics(1)Linzylu07
 
ENG 101 Rubric Compare ContrastPoints 2FPoints3D-D.docx
ENG 101 Rubric Compare ContrastPoints 2FPoints3D-D.docxENG 101 Rubric Compare ContrastPoints 2FPoints3D-D.docx
ENG 101 Rubric Compare ContrastPoints 2FPoints3D-D.docxchristinemaritza
 
Take A Stand Rubric
Take A Stand RubricTake A Stand Rubric
Take A Stand Rubricelavolet
 
OEP: Setting up your company
OEP: Setting up your companyOEP: Setting up your company
OEP: Setting up your companyraul oviedo silva
 
Total Possible Score 4.00General ContentSubject Knowledge To.docx
Total Possible Score 4.00General ContentSubject Knowledge To.docxTotal Possible Score 4.00General ContentSubject Knowledge To.docx
Total Possible Score 4.00General ContentSubject Knowledge To.docxturveycharlyn
 
Rubric epals project
Rubric epals projectRubric epals project
Rubric epals projectAna Martinez
 
Feedback on assignments
Feedback on assignmentsFeedback on assignments
Feedback on assignmentsGreg Myles
 
PhD Support: Handling Criticism and Peer Review
PhD Support: Handling Criticism and Peer ReviewPhD Support: Handling Criticism and Peer Review
PhD Support: Handling Criticism and Peer ReviewDoctoralNet Limited
 
Capstone Example 2_Modified Watrous
Capstone Example 2_Modified WatrousCapstone Example 2_Modified Watrous
Capstone Example 2_Modified WatrousKelseyShroyer
 
Practical Perspectives on Measuring Student Success - L. Mercado IGA 2013 FINAL
Practical Perspectives on Measuring Student Success - L. Mercado IGA 2013 FINALPractical Perspectives on Measuring Student Success - L. Mercado IGA 2013 FINAL
Practical Perspectives on Measuring Student Success - L. Mercado IGA 2013 FINALLeonardo Mercado
 
Tesol 2011 cristin boyd
Tesol 2011 cristin boydTesol 2011 cristin boyd
Tesol 2011 cristin boydsal.teachers
 
senior_thesis_rubric_2020_computational_students.pdf
senior_thesis_rubric_2020_computational_students.pdfsenior_thesis_rubric_2020_computational_students.pdf
senior_thesis_rubric_2020_computational_students.pdfHAMIDKHAN851929
 
Dae seminar 2 9-11 Assessing Writing
Dae seminar 2 9-11 Assessing WritingDae seminar 2 9-11 Assessing Writing
Dae seminar 2 9-11 Assessing WritingMaría Inés Córdoba
 
Speaking assessment-..1330508 (1)
Speaking assessment-..1330508 (1)Speaking assessment-..1330508 (1)
Speaking assessment-..1330508 (1)CristinaGrumal
 

Similar a Rubric (20)

Scoring rubric 1o1
Scoring rubric 1o1Scoring rubric 1o1
Scoring rubric 1o1
 
Rubrics
RubricsRubrics
Rubrics
 
Webquest rubrics(1)
Webquest rubrics(1)Webquest rubrics(1)
Webquest rubrics(1)
 
Rubrica
RubricaRubrica
Rubrica
 
ENG 101 Rubric Compare ContrastPoints 2FPoints3D-D.docx
ENG 101 Rubric Compare ContrastPoints 2FPoints3D-D.docxENG 101 Rubric Compare ContrastPoints 2FPoints3D-D.docx
ENG 101 Rubric Compare ContrastPoints 2FPoints3D-D.docx
 
Take A Stand Rubric
Take A Stand RubricTake A Stand Rubric
Take A Stand Rubric
 
OEP: Setting up your company
OEP: Setting up your companyOEP: Setting up your company
OEP: Setting up your company
 
Total Possible Score 4.00General ContentSubject Knowledge To.docx
Total Possible Score 4.00General ContentSubject Knowledge To.docxTotal Possible Score 4.00General ContentSubject Knowledge To.docx
Total Possible Score 4.00General ContentSubject Knowledge To.docx
 
Rubric epals project
Rubric epals projectRubric epals project
Rubric epals project
 
Feedback on assignments
Feedback on assignmentsFeedback on assignments
Feedback on assignments
 
Cátedra 1, methodology ii
Cátedra 1, methodology iiCátedra 1, methodology ii
Cátedra 1, methodology ii
 
PhD Support: Handling Criticism and Peer Review
PhD Support: Handling Criticism and Peer ReviewPhD Support: Handling Criticism and Peer Review
PhD Support: Handling Criticism and Peer Review
 
Capstone Example 2_Modified Watrous
Capstone Example 2_Modified WatrousCapstone Example 2_Modified Watrous
Capstone Example 2_Modified Watrous
 
Practical Perspectives on Measuring Student Success - L. Mercado IGA 2013 FINAL
Practical Perspectives on Measuring Student Success - L. Mercado IGA 2013 FINALPractical Perspectives on Measuring Student Success - L. Mercado IGA 2013 FINAL
Practical Perspectives on Measuring Student Success - L. Mercado IGA 2013 FINAL
 
Tesol 2011 cristin boyd
Tesol 2011 cristin boydTesol 2011 cristin boyd
Tesol 2011 cristin boyd
 
Rubrics
RubricsRubrics
Rubrics
 
senior_thesis_rubric_2020_computational_students.pdf
senior_thesis_rubric_2020_computational_students.pdfsenior_thesis_rubric_2020_computational_students.pdf
senior_thesis_rubric_2020_computational_students.pdf
 
Dae seminar 2 9-11
Dae seminar 2 9-11 Dae seminar 2 9-11
Dae seminar 2 9-11
 
Dae seminar 2 9-11 Assessing Writing
Dae seminar 2 9-11 Assessing WritingDae seminar 2 9-11 Assessing Writing
Dae seminar 2 9-11 Assessing Writing
 
Speaking assessment-..1330508 (1)
Speaking assessment-..1330508 (1)Speaking assessment-..1330508 (1)
Speaking assessment-..1330508 (1)
 

Más de Frank Westcott (19)

Geotest1review slides
Geotest1review slidesGeotest1review slides
Geotest1review slides
 
Geotest1review
Geotest1reviewGeotest1review
Geotest1review
 
Rubric (1)
Rubric (1)Rubric (1)
Rubric (1)
 
Comic
ComicComic
Comic
 
Comic
ComicComic
Comic
 
Interactive
InteractiveInteractive
Interactive
 
Billtolaw
BilltolawBilltolaw
Billtolaw
 
Exit Project Overview
Exit Project OverviewExit Project Overview
Exit Project Overview
 
Grade 8 social studies exit project
Grade 8 social studies exit projectGrade 8 social studies exit project
Grade 8 social studies exit project
 
7th grade test 1 review
7th grade test 1 review7th grade test 1 review
7th grade test 1 review
 
Colonies to Revolution
Colonies to RevolutionColonies to Revolution
Colonies to Revolution
 
World war 1 test review
World war 1 test reviewWorld war 1 test review
World war 1 test review
 
Progressive Era Notes
Progressive Era NotesProgressive Era Notes
Progressive Era Notes
 
Tah Technology Skills Graphs
Tah Technology Skills GraphsTah Technology Skills Graphs
Tah Technology Skills Graphs
 
PPT Beyond Basics
PPT Beyond BasicsPPT Beyond Basics
PPT Beyond Basics
 
ABCs
ABCsABCs
ABCs
 
Power Point 101
Power Point 101Power Point 101
Power Point 101
 
Searching for Information
Searching for InformationSearching for Information
Searching for Information
 
Vetting Spurious Websites
Vetting Spurious WebsitesVetting Spurious Websites
Vetting Spurious Websites
 

Rubric

  • 1. 1 2 3 4 The task is incomplete and/or it is apparent that little effort went into the development of the task. At least two areas of the task were not addressed. The plan followed by the teacher demonstrated a moderate level of thought. At least one area of the task was not addressed. The plan followed by the teacher demonstrated a great deal of thought. All areas of the task were addressed and handled with a high degree of sophistication. The plan followed by the teacher demonstrated a great deal of thought. Task All activities were NOT completed Only a few activities were completed or most were partially completed. Most activities were fully completed or all activities were partially completed. All activities were fully completed. Process: Activities There were no original ideas expressed in this project. The ideas expressed by the body of work demonstrate a low degree of originality. The ideas expressed by the body of work are mostly original. The group may have improved upon a previous idea. The ideas expressed by the body of work demonstrate a high degree of originality. Process: Originality The final body of work had major grammar, spelling, and formatting errors. The final body of work had 3-5 grammar, spelling, and formatting errors. The final body of work had 1 error related to either grammar, spelling, and formatting errors. The final body of work was free of grammar, spelling, and formatting errors. Grammar, format, and spelling TOTAL---------->