SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 13
Papanikolas, Stathopoulos-Vlamis 3rd
fib International Congress – 2010
THE RION – ANTIRION BRIDGE: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION
Panayotis Papanikolas, PhD, Vice-Chairman and Managing Director, GEFYRA S.A. –
Concession Company for the Rion-Antirion Bridge, Greece
Aris Stathopoulos-Vlamis, Structural Maintenance Manager, GEFYRA S.A. –
Concession Company for the Rion-Antirion Bridge, Greece
ABSTRACT
The Rion-Antirion Bridge located in the Gulf of Corinth of Greece, was given
to traffic in August 2004. As part of the Transeuropean Network, it links the
Peloponnesus to Continental Greece over a stretch of water 2,500m wide. The
project was awarded by the Greek government to GEFYRA S.A, a consortium
led by VINCI and six Greek construction companies. It was the first
concession contract in Greece, based on a financial scheme of build, operate
and transfer.
The environment in which the bridge was constructed combines a number of
physical challenges and thus makes this project quite complex: deep water (up
to 65 m) combined with deep soil strata of weak alluviums, possibility of
strong seismic activity, tectonic movements and adverse high wind actions.
The paper presents the innovative designs of the cable-stayed bridge, which
include: shallow foundations on reinforced soil; continuous and fully
suspended deck for the full length of the bridge (2.252 m); a huge dissipation
system; stay cables equipped with special anti-seismic accessories; and
offshore construction methods.
Keywords: Cable Stayed Bridge, Inclusions, Seismic Dissipation System, Cantilever
Construction
Papanikolas, Stathopoulos-Vlamis 3rd
fib International Congress – 2010
1
THE ENVIRONMENT
The RION-ANTIRION Bridge is located between the Peloponnese and the continent over the
Gulf of Corinth, Western Greece, and is intended to replace an existing ferry system.
Its environment presents an exceptional combination of physical conditions, which makes
this project quite complex: large water depth (up to 65m), deep soil strata of weak
alluviums, strong seismic activity combined with possible tectonic movements, and adverse
high wind actions.
The structure spans a stretch of water of some 2500m. The seabed presents fairly steep slopes
on each side and a long horizontal plateau at a depth of 60 to 70m. No bedrock was
encountered during soil investigations down to a depth of 100m. Based on a geological study
it is believed that the thickness of sediments is greater than 500m. General trends identified
through soils surveys are the following:
• a cohesionless layer is present at mudline level consisting of sand and gravel to a
thickness of 4 to 7m, except under pier M4, where its thickness reaches 25m.
• underneath this layer, the soil profile, rather erratic and heterogeneous, presents strata
of sand, silty sand and silty clay.
• below 30m, the soils are more homogeneous and mainly consist in silty clays or
clays.
In view of the nature of the soils, liquefaction does not appear to be a problem except on the
north shore, where the first 20m are susceptible of liquefaction.
The seismic conditions to be taken into account are presented in the form of a response
spectrum at seabed level given in figure 1. The peak ground acceleration is equal to 0.48g
and the maximum spectral acceleration is equal to 1.2g between periods of 0.2 and 1.0sec.
This spectrum corresponds to a 2000-year return period, or 5% probability of exceedance for
a life of 120 years. In Figure 1 the design spectrum of the Bridge is compared with the one
required by Greek Seismic Code (EAK 2000) for the specific seismic zone of the bridge (III),
with an importance factor of I=1.3.
It is worth mentioning that the Peloponnese drifts away from mainland Greece by a few
millimeters per year. Taking into account the 120 years design life of the bridge, contractual
specifications require the bridge to accommodate possible fault movements up to 2m in any
direction, horizontally and/or vertically between two adjacent piers, in addition with 1/500
vertical tilt of the pylons. The critical accidental seismic load combination consists of the
specified earthquake combined with 50% of the tectonic movements.
Papanikolas, Stathopoulos-Vlamis 3rd
fib International Congress – 2010
2
0
0,3
0,6
0,9
1,2
1,5
0,0 1,0 2,0 3,0 4,0 5,0
Period [s]
pseudoacceleration[g]
EAK 2000
Seismic risk zone III
Soil cat "Γ "
5% damping
Importance factor I = 1,3
RION-ANTIRION
E.A.K.
Fig. 1 Design spectrum
Due to the morphology of the surrounding mountains, the Rion-Antirion strait is known for
the frequent and strong winds. The reference wind speed (hourly average, 10 meters high,
120 years return period) was estimated, from a large database of wind measurements, to be
32 m/sec. At deck level (57 meter above sea level) the reference wind speed is 50 m/sec.
Flexible decks, however, such as cable-stay (i.e.Rion-Antirion Bridge) and suspension
bridges are prone to aerodynamic instabilities. Existing standards require that the
aerodynamic stability of flexible bridges with span larger than 200 meters be confirmed with
aerodynamic tests. For the Rion-Antirion Bridge, the specifications required the critical wind
speed for flutter instability to be higher than 74 m/sec, and that vortex shedding does not
occur for speeds between 0 to 53 m/sec.
In addition, the bridge is capable to withstand the impact from a 180000 dwt tanker sailing at
16 knots. This corresponds to an equivalent horizontal static load of 28000 tons applied at a
height of 67m from the foundation (3m above normal water surface level).
DESCRIPTION OF THE BRIDGE
These difficult environmental conditions called for an original design based on large
foundations able to sustain seismic forces and large spans in order to limit the number of
these foundations. The bridge consists of:
• the cable-stayed main bridge, 2252m long, built on 4 large foundations with a span
distribution equal to 286m – 560m – 560m – 560m – 286m (Figure 2).
• the approach viaducts, 1000m on Rion side (composite deck), the 392m being within
the concession area and 239m on Antirion side (pre-stressed simple supported
beams).
Papanikolas, Stathopoulos-Vlamis 3rd
fib International Congress – 2010
3
Fig. 2 Bridge elevation
Foundations consist of large diameter (90m) caissons, resting on the seabed (Figure 3). The
top 20m of soils are rather heterogeneous and of low mechanical characteristics. To provide
sufficient shear strength to these soil strata, which have to carry large seismic forces coming
from structural inertia forces and hydrodynamic water pressures, the upper soil layer is
reinforced by inclusions.
Fig. 3 Foundation and soil reinforcement with inclusions
These inclusions are hollow steel pipes, 25 to 30m long, 2m in diameter, driven into the
upper layer at a regular spacing of 7 to 8m (depending on the pier); about 150 to 200 pipes
were driven in at each pier location. They are topped by a 3m thick, properly selected and
leveled gravel layer, on which the foundations rest. These inclusions are not required under
pier M4 owing to the presence of a thick natural gravel layer.
The cable-stayed deck is a composite steel-concrete structure with a width of 27.2m, carrying
two traffic lanes in each direction. The steel frame was made of two longitudinal plate girders
2.2m high on each side of the deck with transverse plate girders spaced at 4m and a concrete
slab, 0.25 to 0.35m thick (Figure 4). On top, asphalt concrete pavement of 75mm thickness,
including special waterproofing membrane, have been placed. The deck superstructure is
continuous and fully suspended by means of stay cables for its total length of 2252 meters. In
the longitudinal direction, the deck is free to accommodate all thermal and tectonic
movements. At its extremities, expansion joints can accommodate the following movements:
Papanikolas, Stathopoulos-Vlamis 3rd
fib International Congress – 2010
4
• Under service conditions – in the longitudinal direction: opening +1.26m, closing –
1.22m, and
• under an extreme seismic event: +2.81m to –2.2m in the longitudinal direction and
±2.5m in the transverse direction.
Fig. 4 Typical deck cross section
Each pylon is composed of four legs 4 x 4m, made of high strength concrete, joined at the top
to give the rigidity necessary to support unsymmetrical service loads and seismic forces
(Figure 5). The pylons are rigidly embedded in pier head to form a monolithic structure, up to
230m high, from sea bottom to pylon top.
Fig. 5 Pier and pylon
The stay cables, forming a semi-fan shape, are in two inclined arrangements, with their lower
anchorages on deck sides and their upper anchorages at the pylon top. They are made of 43 to
73 parallel-galvanized strands individually protected with an extruded layer of HDPE.
Finally, all strands are placed inside a HDPE duct. The cable stay system, which is supplied
by Freyssinet, is equipped with special accessories related to it behaviour during a major
earthquake. It includes wedge-blocking devices in case that the cable is unloaded and
bending guiding tubes at the anchorage to control the curvature of the cable during
earthquake oscillations. Following a close monitoring of the behaviour of the cables for wind
induced vibrations, in 2006 (two years after operation) it was decided to improve the
behaviour of cables, with length higher than 100m, by increasing the damping of the cable
Papanikolas, Stathopoulos-Vlamis 3rd
fib International Congress – 2010
5
system. This was achieved with the installation of external dampers close to the bottom
anchorage (Figure 6).
Fig. 6 Cable stays external hydraulic dampers
Finally, conservatory measures were taken for future installation of internal dampers on the
short cables and secondary cross-ties, in case that the cables experience any additional type
of vibration.
An innovative energy dissipation system connects the deck to the top of each pier and limits
the lateral movement of the deck during the specified earthquake, while dissipating the
seismic energy. The seismic protection system comprises fuse restraints and viscous dampers
acting in parallel, connecting in the transverse direction the deck to the piers. The restrainers
are designed as a rigid link intended to protect (to block) the hydraulic devices by
withstanding the high wind loads up to a pre-determined force corresponding to a value
slightly higher than the wind load ultimate limit state. Under an earthquake, the fuse
restrainers are designed to yield, leaving the viscous dampers free to dissipate the energy
induced by the earthquake into the structure. After the seismic event, new fuses can be re-
installed in few weeks.
DESIGN CONCEPT
From the beginning it was clear that the critical load for most of the structure is the design
seismic loading. The impact from the 180000 dwt tanker, equivalent to a static horizontal
force of 280MN at sea level, creates shear forces and overturning moments smaller than
seismic loads under the design spectrum and necessitates only local strengthening of piers in
the impact zone.
The choice of the present design was made after examination of a wide range of possible
solutions in term of span type (suspension spans vs. cable-stayed spans) and foundation
concepts. Particularly with regard to the foundations, the bearing capacity was a major
concern in these difficult environmental conditions characterised by poor soil conditions,
Papanikolas, Stathopoulos-Vlamis 3rd
fib International Congress – 2010
6
significant seismic accelerations and large depth of water. Alternative foundation concepts
(such as pile foundations, deep embedded caissons and soil substitution) were investigated
with their relative merits in terms of economy, feasibility and technical soundness1
. This
analysis showed that a shallow foundation was the most satisfactory solution as long as it
was feasible to significantly improve the top 20m of soils. The improvement of the shear
resistance of the soil was achieved by means of metallic inclusions, as described here above.
Although these foundations resemble piled foundations, they do not at all behave as such: no
connection exists between the inclusions and the caisson raft, which will allow for the
foundation to uplift partially or to slide with respect to the soil; the density of inclusions is far
more important and the length smaller than would have been the case in piled foundations.
The major concept for the selected shallow foundation is that the forces of the structure will
initially transferred through contact (mainly friction) to a gravel bed layer and then to the
original soil that is reinforced with the metallic inclusions. The word “inclusion” was
selected instead of “pile” in order to mark the difference in the foundation behavior. This
type of soil reinforcement is quite innovative and necessitated extensive numerical studies
and centrifuge model tests for its validation in the Laboratoire Central des Ponts et Chaussées
(France).
Another unique feature of this project lies in its continuous cable-stayed deck, which, in
addition to being the longest in the world, is fully suspended. This creates an effective
isolation system significantly reducing seismic forces in the deck and allowing the bridge to
accommodate fault movements between adjacent piers thanks to its flexibility. In particular
the 20 first natural periods of vibration of the deck are from 1.8 sec up to 7.2 sec, while the
pier eigen-frequencies are around 0.55 sec. This feature allows low acceleration for the deck
mass and thus lower forces on the piers.
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
1.40
0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00
Period (sec)
PseudoFrequencies(g)
KME Spectrum
DECK
EIGENFREQUENCIES
PYLON
EIGENFREQUENCIES
Fig. 7 Structure eigen-frequencies and KME spectrum
In the transverse direction the deck will behave like a pendulum and its lateral movements
must be buffered. This is achieved with the use of 4 hydraulic dampers at the pylon locations
and two at the transition piers, having a capacity of 3500 kN each, operating both in tension
and compression. They are able to limit the relative lateral displacements between the deck
and the pylons and dissipate large amount of energy during a seismic event. The dynamic
relative stroke between the deck and a pylon during an extreme seismic event will be in the
order of 3.50m, with velocities up to 1.6m/sec. The constitutive law of the dampers is non-
Papanikolas, Stathopoulos-Vlamis 3rd
fib International Congress – 2010
7
linear viscous, with a velocity exponent of 0.15 (F=C.V0.15
, where C=3, V in m/sec and F in
MN).
The dissipation system (4 dampers, 2 on each side) installed between deck and a pier is
illustrated in the next figure. In order to avoid deck transverse movements due to wind, a
special metallic strut, called “fuse restrainer”, connects the deck and each pier. This lateral
restrainer incorporates a mechanical device that fuses at ±10500kN. The function of this
device is to allow transversal deck motion only after a seismic event of low occurrence
enabling the dampers to go into action.
Fig. 8 Dissipation system between deck and piers
A prototype test for these dampers was performed in the CALTRANS testing facility at the
University of California San Diego2
(Figure 9).
Fig. 9 Prototype testing of hydraulic dampers at SRMD Facility (UCSD)
The good performance of the dissipation system of the bridge was confirmed after a seismic
event of a moment magnitude of Mw=6.5, that took place on June 08, 2008 with an epicenter
located approximately 36km SW of the bridge and a focal depth of around 30km. The
recorded peak ground acceleration was 0.13g, while the maximum estimated under the piers
was 0.18g. The fuses yielded and the dampers operated with a maximum estimated velocity
of 0.28m/sec and a maximum stroke of 15cm.
Papanikolas, Stathopoulos-Vlamis 3rd
fib International Congress – 2010
8
An expansion joint with special fuse elements was designed by Maurer Söhne to allow the
maximum design movements of the main bridge to the approach viaducts. While the
expansion joint accommodates a service movement of 1.22m closing, 1.26m opening in
longitudinal and +/- 0.10m in lateral direction, it is designed for a maximum opening of
2.20m closing, 2.81m opening in longitudinal and +/- 2.50m in lateral direction for the
specified design earthquake (Figure 10). During this seismic event fuse elements within the
expansion joint will open to minimize the forces induced to the bridge structure and keep the
expansion joint with minor damages. Several tests for these fuse elements were performed on
a shaking table of the Enel.Hydro S.p.A. – B.U. ISMES in Bergamo (Italy).
Fig. 10 Installation of MAURER expansion joint
The capacity design of the structure for the extreme seismic event consisted of a “control
damage” approach at the following locations: sliding at the foundation raft-soil interface,
dissipation of energy by viscous dampers at pylon locations and potential formation of plastic
hinges (with a minor damage of concrete spalling) at pylons legs. The dynamic response of
the structure was estimated with artificial and natural accelerograms matching the design
spectrum based on a non-linear time history analysis. This analysis took into account large
displacements, hysteretic behaviour of materials, non-linear viscous behaviour of the
dissipation system, sliding and uplifting elements at the raft-soil interface and a reological
model for the soil-structure interaction1
.
In addition to the 3D finite element analysis, a non-linear 3D push over analysis was
performed for the 4 leg pylons in order to estimate their remaining capacity after the
formation of plastic hinges and to confirm their ductile behaviour of the highly confined
pylon legs. Special concrete confinement tests were also performed at the University of
California San Diego on high strength concrete (C60/75) used for pylon legs in order to
define its strain-stress curves (especially the reduced slope of the descending branch of the
curves) for various confinement ratios.
Papanikolas, Stathopoulos-Vlamis 3rd
fib International Congress – 2010
9
CONSTRUCTION METHODS
Construction methods for the foundations were those commonly used for the construction of
offshore concrete platforms:
• construction of the foundation footings in a dry dock up to a height of 15m in order to
provide sufficient buoyancy;
• towing and mooring of these footings at a wet dock site;
• construction of the conical part of the foundations at the wet dock site;
• towing and immersion of the foundations at final position.
However, some features of this project made the construction process of its foundations quite
exceptional.
The dry dock has been established near the site. It was 200m long, 100m wide, 14m deep,
and could accommodate the simultaneous construction of two foundations. It had an unusual
closure system: the first foundation was built behind the protection of a dyke, but once towed
out, the second foundation, the construction of which had already started, was floated to the
front place and used as a dock gate.
Fig. 11 Construction in dry dock
Dredging the seabed, driving 500 inclusions, placing and leveling the gravel layer on the top,
with a depth of water reaching 65m, was a major marine operation, which necessitated
special equipment and procedures. In fact, a tension-leg barge has been custom-made, based
on the well-known concept of tension-leg platforms but used for the first time for movable
equipment. This concept was based on active vertical anchorage to dead weights lying on the
seabed (Figure 12).
Papanikolas, Stathopoulos-Vlamis 3rd
fib International Congress – 2010
10
Fig. 12 Tension-leg barge
The tension in these vertical anchor lines was adjusted in order to give the required stability
to the barge with respect to sea movements and loads handled by the crane disposed on its
deck. By increasing the tension in the anchor lines, the buoyancy of the barge allowed the
anchor weights to be lifted from the seabed, then the barge, including its weights, could be
floated away to a new position.
As already stated, once completed the pier bases were towed then sunk at their final position.
Compartments created in the footings by the radial beams were used to control trim by
differential ballasting. Then the pier bases were filled with water to accelerate settlements,
which are significant (between 0.1 and 0.2m). This pre-loading was maintained during pier
shaft and pier head construction, thus allowing a correction for potential differential
settlements before erecting pylons and deck superstructure.
The deck of the main bridge was erected using the balanced free-cantilever technique, with
prefabricated deck elements 12m long comprising also their concrete slab. The total weight
of a prefabricated segment is 340 tons and was placed with a floating crane (TAKLIFT 7).
The rate of erection of completed deck structure was up to 60m per week (Figure 13).
Papanikolas, Stathopoulos-Vlamis 3rd
fib International Congress – 2010
11
Fig. 6 Installation of a prefabricated deck segment
CONCLUSIONS
The Rion – Antirion Bridge had to overcome an exceptional combination of adverse
environmental conditions: water depth up to 65m, deep soil strata of weak alluviums, strong
seismic activity and tectonic movements.
This resulted in a unique multi-span cable-stayed bridge with a continuous deck for the full
length of the stretch (2252m), fully suspended from four pylons. Foundations consist in large
diameter (90m) caissons resting on the seabed. The top 20m of soils are reinforced by means
of metallic inclusions, based on an innovative concept.
The design and construction of this € 800 million project have been undertaken under a
private BOT scheme, led by the French company VINCI. The whole project was completed
on summer 2004, ahead of the contractual deadline by several months (Figure 14).
REFERENCES
1. Pecker, A., “A seismic foundation design process, Lessons learned from two major
projects: The Vasco da Gama and the Rion-Antirion Bridges” ACI International Conference
on Seismic Bridge Design and Retrofit, 2003, La Jolla, California.
2. Infanti S., Papanikolas P., Theodossopoulos G., “Rion-Antirion Bridge: Full-Scale Testing
of Seismic Devices” fib 2003 Symposium, May 6-8, 2003, Athens, Greece.
Papanikolas, Stathopoulos-Vlamis 3rd
fib International Congress – 2010
12
Fig. 7 The Rion-Antirion Bridge close to completion (spring 2004)

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente

Tunnels and tunneling (Engineering Geology)
Tunnels and tunneling (Engineering Geology)Tunnels and tunneling (Engineering Geology)
Tunnels and tunneling (Engineering Geology)SudhanKumarSubedi
 
tunnelling scope, construction techniques and necessity
tunnelling scope, construction techniques and necessitytunnelling scope, construction techniques and necessity
tunnelling scope, construction techniques and necessityShashank Gaurav
 
Michalis presentation_2015
Michalis presentation_2015Michalis presentation_2015
Michalis presentation_2015ILIAS MICHALIS
 
Tunnel constructions
Tunnel constructionsTunnel constructions
Tunnel constructionsVinay Vb
 
Study of tunnel engineering
Study of tunnel engineeringStudy of tunnel engineering
Study of tunnel engineeringAdil Shaikh
 
7. TUNNEL ENGINEERING
7. TUNNEL ENGINEERING7. TUNNEL ENGINEERING
7. TUNNEL ENGINEERINGVATSAL PATEL
 
Cut and cover_sections
Cut and cover_sectionsCut and cover_sections
Cut and cover_sectionsjuwes
 
Importance of geological considerations while choosing tunnel sites and align...
Importance of geological considerations while choosing tunnel sites and align...Importance of geological considerations while choosing tunnel sites and align...
Importance of geological considerations while choosing tunnel sites and align...Buddharatna godboley
 
Detailed Slope Stability Analysis and Assessment of the Original Carsington E...
Detailed Slope Stability Analysis and Assessment of the Original Carsington E...Detailed Slope Stability Analysis and Assessment of the Original Carsington E...
Detailed Slope Stability Analysis and Assessment of the Original Carsington E...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
 
Advanced tunnel borring machine.ppt
Advanced tunnel borring machine.pptAdvanced tunnel borring machine.ppt
Advanced tunnel borring machine.pptabhishek kulkarni
 
Presentation to the International Workshop on Mosul Dam held in Stockholm . M...
Presentation to the International Workshop on Mosul Dam held in Stockholm . M...Presentation to the International Workshop on Mosul Dam held in Stockholm . M...
Presentation to the International Workshop on Mosul Dam held in Stockholm . M...Nasrat Adamo
 
project on dam and dam safety with application of geophysics
project on dam and dam safety with application of geophysicsproject on dam and dam safety with application of geophysics
project on dam and dam safety with application of geophysicsRIPU DAMAN SINGH
 
Tunneling exploration
Tunneling explorationTunneling exploration
Tunneling explorationjamali husain
 

La actualidad más candente (20)

Tunnels and tunneling (Engineering Geology)
Tunnels and tunneling (Engineering Geology)Tunnels and tunneling (Engineering Geology)
Tunnels and tunneling (Engineering Geology)
 
tunnelling scope, construction techniques and necessity
tunnelling scope, construction techniques and necessitytunnelling scope, construction techniques and necessity
tunnelling scope, construction techniques and necessity
 
Michalis presentation_2015
Michalis presentation_2015Michalis presentation_2015
Michalis presentation_2015
 
Tunnel constructions
Tunnel constructionsTunnel constructions
Tunnel constructions
 
Presentation1mining
Presentation1miningPresentation1mining
Presentation1mining
 
Study of tunnel engineering
Study of tunnel engineeringStudy of tunnel engineering
Study of tunnel engineering
 
7. TUNNEL ENGINEERING
7. TUNNEL ENGINEERING7. TUNNEL ENGINEERING
7. TUNNEL ENGINEERING
 
Site visit presentation: Kwun Tong line extension
Site visit presentation: Kwun Tong line extensionSite visit presentation: Kwun Tong line extension
Site visit presentation: Kwun Tong line extension
 
Under ground railway
Under ground railwayUnder ground railway
Under ground railway
 
2 tunnels
2 tunnels2 tunnels
2 tunnels
 
Cut and cover
Cut and coverCut and cover
Cut and cover
 
Cut and cover_sections
Cut and cover_sectionsCut and cover_sections
Cut and cover_sections
 
Importance of geological considerations while choosing tunnel sites and align...
Importance of geological considerations while choosing tunnel sites and align...Importance of geological considerations while choosing tunnel sites and align...
Importance of geological considerations while choosing tunnel sites and align...
 
Detailed Slope Stability Analysis and Assessment of the Original Carsington E...
Detailed Slope Stability Analysis and Assessment of the Original Carsington E...Detailed Slope Stability Analysis and Assessment of the Original Carsington E...
Detailed Slope Stability Analysis and Assessment of the Original Carsington E...
 
Advanced tunnel borring machine.ppt
Advanced tunnel borring machine.pptAdvanced tunnel borring machine.ppt
Advanced tunnel borring machine.ppt
 
Presentation to the International Workshop on Mosul Dam held in Stockholm . M...
Presentation to the International Workshop on Mosul Dam held in Stockholm . M...Presentation to the International Workshop on Mosul Dam held in Stockholm . M...
Presentation to the International Workshop on Mosul Dam held in Stockholm . M...
 
Dam safety
Dam safetyDam safety
Dam safety
 
project on dam and dam safety with application of geophysics
project on dam and dam safety with application of geophysicsproject on dam and dam safety with application of geophysics
project on dam and dam safety with application of geophysics
 
Tunneling exploration
Tunneling explorationTunneling exploration
Tunneling exploration
 
Tunnel’s
Tunnel’sTunnel’s
Tunnel’s
 

Similar a Fib2010 article260 design & construction_rev_a

Mokpo symposium pecker 2006
Mokpo symposium pecker 2006Mokpo symposium pecker 2006
Mokpo symposium pecker 2006gefyra-rion
 
Athens pecker 2005
Athens pecker 2005Athens pecker 2005
Athens pecker 2005gefyra-rion
 
Geo trans2004 pecker
Geo trans2004 peckerGeo trans2004 pecker
Geo trans2004 peckergefyra-rion
 
Votonosi Bridge - The Structural Engineer
Votonosi Bridge - The Structural EngineerVotonosi Bridge - The Structural Engineer
Votonosi Bridge - The Structural EngineerChristos Miltsakakis
 
Busan geoje fixed link
Busan   geoje fixed linkBusan   geoje fixed link
Busan geoje fixed linkVicky Matwan
 
RMT Group5 presentation.pptx
RMT Group5 presentation.pptxRMT Group5 presentation.pptx
RMT Group5 presentation.pptxSubratDash37
 
SUBMERGED FLOATING TUNNEL
SUBMERGED FLOATING TUNNELSUBMERGED FLOATING TUNNEL
SUBMERGED FLOATING TUNNELseminarppts
 
Rion antirion - yerevan - oct 2003
Rion antirion - yerevan  - oct 2003Rion antirion - yerevan  - oct 2003
Rion antirion - yerevan - oct 2003gefyra-rion
 
Nhpc training report civil engineerimg_bit_mesra_ISHANT GAUTAM
Nhpc training report civil engineerimg_bit_mesra_ISHANT GAUTAMNhpc training report civil engineerimg_bit_mesra_ISHANT GAUTAM
Nhpc training report civil engineerimg_bit_mesra_ISHANT GAUTAMIshant Gautam.
 
Effect Of Water On Slope Stability And Investigation Of ΝΝw Drainage Techniqu...
Effect Of Water On Slope Stability And Investigation Of ΝΝw Drainage Techniqu...Effect Of Water On Slope Stability And Investigation Of ΝΝw Drainage Techniqu...
Effect Of Water On Slope Stability And Investigation Of ΝΝw Drainage Techniqu...IJMER
 
Bridge Construction Kalia Bhomara Setu
Bridge Construction Kalia Bhomara SetuBridge Construction Kalia Bhomara Setu
Bridge Construction Kalia Bhomara SetuVishweshwar Rao Narla
 
pile foundation of burj khalifa
pile foundation of burj khalifapile foundation of burj khalifa
pile foundation of burj khalifaSUNILPRASAD68
 

Similar a Fib2010 article260 design & construction_rev_a (20)

Mokpo symposium pecker 2006
Mokpo symposium pecker 2006Mokpo symposium pecker 2006
Mokpo symposium pecker 2006
 
Athens pecker 2005
Athens pecker 2005Athens pecker 2005
Athens pecker 2005
 
Dfi2005 pecker
Dfi2005 peckerDfi2005 pecker
Dfi2005 pecker
 
Geo trans2004 pecker
Geo trans2004 peckerGeo trans2004 pecker
Geo trans2004 pecker
 
Votonosi Bridge - The Structural Engineer
Votonosi Bridge - The Structural EngineerVotonosi Bridge - The Structural Engineer
Votonosi Bridge - The Structural Engineer
 
Busan geoje fixed link
Busan   geoje fixed linkBusan   geoje fixed link
Busan geoje fixed link
 
S7
S7S7
S7
 
RMT Group5 presentation.pptx
RMT Group5 presentation.pptxRMT Group5 presentation.pptx
RMT Group5 presentation.pptx
 
PPT
PPTPPT
PPT
 
Rion antirion bridge
Rion antirion bridgeRion antirion bridge
Rion antirion bridge
 
SUBMERGED FLOATING TUNNEL
SUBMERGED FLOATING TUNNELSUBMERGED FLOATING TUNNEL
SUBMERGED FLOATING TUNNEL
 
the millau viaduct
the millau viaductthe millau viaduct
the millau viaduct
 
Rion antirion - yerevan - oct 2003
Rion antirion - yerevan  - oct 2003Rion antirion - yerevan  - oct 2003
Rion antirion - yerevan - oct 2003
 
floating tunnels
floating tunnelsfloating tunnels
floating tunnels
 
Rio Antirio Bridge - Report
Rio Antirio Bridge - ReportRio Antirio Bridge - Report
Rio Antirio Bridge - Report
 
Nhpc training report civil engineerimg_bit_mesra_ISHANT GAUTAM
Nhpc training report civil engineerimg_bit_mesra_ISHANT GAUTAMNhpc training report civil engineerimg_bit_mesra_ISHANT GAUTAM
Nhpc training report civil engineerimg_bit_mesra_ISHANT GAUTAM
 
Effect Of Water On Slope Stability And Investigation Of ΝΝw Drainage Techniqu...
Effect Of Water On Slope Stability And Investigation Of ΝΝw Drainage Techniqu...Effect Of Water On Slope Stability And Investigation Of ΝΝw Drainage Techniqu...
Effect Of Water On Slope Stability And Investigation Of ΝΝw Drainage Techniqu...
 
Bridge Construction Kalia Bhomara Setu
Bridge Construction Kalia Bhomara SetuBridge Construction Kalia Bhomara Setu
Bridge Construction Kalia Bhomara Setu
 
Auckland
AucklandAuckland
Auckland
 
pile foundation of burj khalifa
pile foundation of burj khalifapile foundation of burj khalifa
pile foundation of burj khalifa
 

Más de gefyra-rion

ΓΕΦΥΡΑ Α.Ε. – Ισολογισμός 31.12.2012
ΓΕΦΥΡΑ Α.Ε. – Ισολογισμός 31.12.2012ΓΕΦΥΡΑ Α.Ε. – Ισολογισμός 31.12.2012
ΓΕΦΥΡΑ Α.Ε. – Ισολογισμός 31.12.2012gefyra-rion
 
ΓΕΦΥΡΑ Α.Ε. – Πρόσκληση σε τακτική γενική συνέλευση των μετόχων
ΓΕΦΥΡΑ Α.Ε. – Πρόσκληση σε τακτική γενική συνέλευση των μετόχωνΓΕΦΥΡΑ Α.Ε. – Πρόσκληση σε τακτική γενική συνέλευση των μετόχων
ΓΕΦΥΡΑ Α.Ε. – Πρόσκληση σε τακτική γενική συνέλευση των μετόχωνgefyra-rion
 
Universite de tous les savoirs
Universite de tous les savoirsUniversite de tous les savoirs
Universite de tous les savoirsgefyra-rion
 
The stay cable system papanikolas liolios
The stay cable system papanikolas lioliosThe stay cable system papanikolas liolios
The stay cable system papanikolas lioliosgefyra-rion
 
Patras 4th congress on steel structures
Patras 4th congress on steel structuresPatras 4th congress on steel structures
Patras 4th congress on steel structuresgefyra-rion
 
Montrιal o.flamand
Montrιal o.flamandMontrιal o.flamand
Montrιal o.flamandgefyra-rion
 
Iscd2009 flamand ppa_final
Iscd2009 flamand ppa_finalIscd2009 flamand ppa_final
Iscd2009 flamand ppa_finalgefyra-rion
 
Seismic Design for the Foundation of the Rion Antirion Bridge
Seismic Design for the Foundation of the Rion Antirion BridgeSeismic Design for the Foundation of the Rion Antirion Bridge
Seismic Design for the Foundation of the Rion Antirion Bridgegefyra-rion
 
Hsgf bolts papanikolas
Hsgf bolts papanikolasHsgf bolts papanikolas
Hsgf bolts papanikolasgefyra-rion
 
Fib2010 article269 june 2008 eq case study_rev_a
Fib2010 article269 june 2008 eq case study_rev_aFib2010 article269 june 2008 eq case study_rev_a
Fib2010 article269 june 2008 eq case study_rev_agefyra-rion
 
Fib2010 article263 concrete durability_rev_a
Fib2010 article263 concrete durability_rev_aFib2010 article263 concrete durability_rev_a
Fib2010 article263 concrete durability_rev_agefyra-rion
 

Más de gefyra-rion (20)

ΓΕΦΥΡΑ Α.Ε. – Ισολογισμός 31.12.2012
ΓΕΦΥΡΑ Α.Ε. – Ισολογισμός 31.12.2012ΓΕΦΥΡΑ Α.Ε. – Ισολογισμός 31.12.2012
ΓΕΦΥΡΑ Α.Ε. – Ισολογισμός 31.12.2012
 
ΓΕΦΥΡΑ Α.Ε. – Πρόσκληση σε τακτική γενική συνέλευση των μετόχων
ΓΕΦΥΡΑ Α.Ε. – Πρόσκληση σε τακτική γενική συνέλευση των μετόχωνΓΕΦΥΡΑ Α.Ε. – Πρόσκληση σε τακτική γενική συνέλευση των μετόχων
ΓΕΦΥΡΑ Α.Ε. – Πρόσκληση σε τακτική γενική συνέλευση των μετόχων
 
Universite de tous les savoirs
Universite de tous les savoirsUniversite de tous les savoirs
Universite de tous les savoirs
 
Travaux no 809
Travaux no 809Travaux no 809
Travaux no 809
 
The stay cable system papanikolas liolios
The stay cable system papanikolas lioliosThe stay cable system papanikolas liolios
The stay cable system papanikolas liolios
 
Pecker aci2003
Pecker aci2003Pecker aci2003
Pecker aci2003
 
Pecker salencon
Pecker salenconPecker salencon
Pecker salencon
 
Patras 4th congress on steel structures
Patras 4th congress on steel structuresPatras 4th congress on steel structures
Patras 4th congress on steel structures
 
Montrιal o.flamand
Montrιal o.flamandMontrιal o.flamand
Montrιal o.flamand
 
Londe ap
Londe apLonde ap
Londe ap
 
Lisbonne
LisbonneLisbonne
Lisbonne
 
La recherche
La rechercheLa recherche
La recherche
 
Ix 29
Ix 29Ix 29
Ix 29
 
Iscd2009 flamand ppa_final
Iscd2009 flamand ppa_finalIscd2009 flamand ppa_final
Iscd2009 flamand ppa_final
 
Seismic Design for the Foundation of the Rion Antirion Bridge
Seismic Design for the Foundation of the Rion Antirion BridgeSeismic Design for the Foundation of the Rion Antirion Bridge
Seismic Design for the Foundation of the Rion Antirion Bridge
 
Hsgf bolts papanikolas
Hsgf bolts papanikolasHsgf bolts papanikolas
Hsgf bolts papanikolas
 
Habib
HabibHabib
Habib
 
Fip rion2
Fip rion2Fip rion2
Fip rion2
 
Fib2010 article269 june 2008 eq case study_rev_a
Fib2010 article269 june 2008 eq case study_rev_aFib2010 article269 june 2008 eq case study_rev_a
Fib2010 article269 june 2008 eq case study_rev_a
 
Fib2010 article263 concrete durability_rev_a
Fib2010 article263 concrete durability_rev_aFib2010 article263 concrete durability_rev_a
Fib2010 article263 concrete durability_rev_a
 

Último

Flow Control | Block Size | ST Min | First Frame
Flow Control | Block Size | ST Min | First FrameFlow Control | Block Size | ST Min | First Frame
Flow Control | Block Size | ST Min | First FrameKapil Thakar
 
Top 10 Squarespace Development Companies
Top 10 Squarespace Development CompaniesTop 10 Squarespace Development Companies
Top 10 Squarespace Development CompaniesTopCSSGallery
 
Emil Eifrem at GraphSummit Copenhagen 2024 - The Art of the Possible.pptx
Emil Eifrem at GraphSummit Copenhagen 2024 - The Art of the Possible.pptxEmil Eifrem at GraphSummit Copenhagen 2024 - The Art of the Possible.pptx
Emil Eifrem at GraphSummit Copenhagen 2024 - The Art of the Possible.pptxNeo4j
 
Stobox 4: Revolutionizing Investment in Real-World Assets Through Tokenization
Stobox 4: Revolutionizing Investment in Real-World Assets Through TokenizationStobox 4: Revolutionizing Investment in Real-World Assets Through Tokenization
Stobox 4: Revolutionizing Investment in Real-World Assets Through TokenizationStobox
 
Introduction - IPLOOK NETWORKS CO., LTD.
Introduction - IPLOOK NETWORKS CO., LTD.Introduction - IPLOOK NETWORKS CO., LTD.
Introduction - IPLOOK NETWORKS CO., LTD.IPLOOK Networks
 
Novo Nordisk's journey in developing an open-source application on Neo4j
Novo Nordisk's journey in developing an open-source application on Neo4jNovo Nordisk's journey in developing an open-source application on Neo4j
Novo Nordisk's journey in developing an open-source application on Neo4jNeo4j
 
How to release an Open Source Dataweave Library
How to release an Open Source Dataweave LibraryHow to release an Open Source Dataweave Library
How to release an Open Source Dataweave Libraryshyamraj55
 
Planetek Italia Srl - Corporate Profile Brochure
Planetek Italia Srl - Corporate Profile BrochurePlanetek Italia Srl - Corporate Profile Brochure
Planetek Italia Srl - Corporate Profile BrochurePlanetek Italia Srl
 
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 1
UiPath Studio Web workshop series  - Day 1UiPath Studio Web workshop series  - Day 1
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 1DianaGray10
 
The Zero-ETL Approach: Enhancing Data Agility and Insight
The Zero-ETL Approach: Enhancing Data Agility and InsightThe Zero-ETL Approach: Enhancing Data Agility and Insight
The Zero-ETL Approach: Enhancing Data Agility and InsightSafe Software
 
Patch notes explaining DISARM Version 1.4 update
Patch notes explaining DISARM Version 1.4 updatePatch notes explaining DISARM Version 1.4 update
Patch notes explaining DISARM Version 1.4 updateadam112203
 
GraphSummit Copenhagen 2024 - Neo4j Vision and Roadmap.pptx
GraphSummit Copenhagen 2024 - Neo4j Vision and Roadmap.pptxGraphSummit Copenhagen 2024 - Neo4j Vision and Roadmap.pptx
GraphSummit Copenhagen 2024 - Neo4j Vision and Roadmap.pptxNeo4j
 
March Patch Tuesday
March Patch TuesdayMarch Patch Tuesday
March Patch TuesdayIvanti
 
Automation Ops Series: Session 2 - Governance for UiPath projects
Automation Ops Series: Session 2 - Governance for UiPath projectsAutomation Ops Series: Session 2 - Governance for UiPath projects
Automation Ops Series: Session 2 - Governance for UiPath projectsDianaGray10
 
IT Service Management (ITSM) Best Practices for Advanced Computing
IT Service Management (ITSM) Best Practices for Advanced ComputingIT Service Management (ITSM) Best Practices for Advanced Computing
IT Service Management (ITSM) Best Practices for Advanced ComputingMAGNIntelligence
 
How to become a GDSC Lead GDSC MI AOE.pptx
How to become a GDSC Lead GDSC MI AOE.pptxHow to become a GDSC Lead GDSC MI AOE.pptx
How to become a GDSC Lead GDSC MI AOE.pptxKaustubhBhavsar6
 
.NET 8 ChatBot with Azure OpenAI Services.pptx
.NET 8 ChatBot with Azure OpenAI Services.pptx.NET 8 ChatBot with Azure OpenAI Services.pptx
.NET 8 ChatBot with Azure OpenAI Services.pptxHansamali Gamage
 
20140402 - Smart house demo kit
20140402 - Smart house demo kit20140402 - Smart house demo kit
20140402 - Smart house demo kitJamie (Taka) Wang
 
Extra-120324-Visite-Entreprise-icare.pdf
Extra-120324-Visite-Entreprise-icare.pdfExtra-120324-Visite-Entreprise-icare.pdf
Extra-120324-Visite-Entreprise-icare.pdfInfopole1
 

Último (20)

Flow Control | Block Size | ST Min | First Frame
Flow Control | Block Size | ST Min | First FrameFlow Control | Block Size | ST Min | First Frame
Flow Control | Block Size | ST Min | First Frame
 
Top 10 Squarespace Development Companies
Top 10 Squarespace Development CompaniesTop 10 Squarespace Development Companies
Top 10 Squarespace Development Companies
 
Emil Eifrem at GraphSummit Copenhagen 2024 - The Art of the Possible.pptx
Emil Eifrem at GraphSummit Copenhagen 2024 - The Art of the Possible.pptxEmil Eifrem at GraphSummit Copenhagen 2024 - The Art of the Possible.pptx
Emil Eifrem at GraphSummit Copenhagen 2024 - The Art of the Possible.pptx
 
Stobox 4: Revolutionizing Investment in Real-World Assets Through Tokenization
Stobox 4: Revolutionizing Investment in Real-World Assets Through TokenizationStobox 4: Revolutionizing Investment in Real-World Assets Through Tokenization
Stobox 4: Revolutionizing Investment in Real-World Assets Through Tokenization
 
Introduction - IPLOOK NETWORKS CO., LTD.
Introduction - IPLOOK NETWORKS CO., LTD.Introduction - IPLOOK NETWORKS CO., LTD.
Introduction - IPLOOK NETWORKS CO., LTD.
 
Novo Nordisk's journey in developing an open-source application on Neo4j
Novo Nordisk's journey in developing an open-source application on Neo4jNovo Nordisk's journey in developing an open-source application on Neo4j
Novo Nordisk's journey in developing an open-source application on Neo4j
 
How to release an Open Source Dataweave Library
How to release an Open Source Dataweave LibraryHow to release an Open Source Dataweave Library
How to release an Open Source Dataweave Library
 
Planetek Italia Srl - Corporate Profile Brochure
Planetek Italia Srl - Corporate Profile BrochurePlanetek Italia Srl - Corporate Profile Brochure
Planetek Italia Srl - Corporate Profile Brochure
 
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 1
UiPath Studio Web workshop series  - Day 1UiPath Studio Web workshop series  - Day 1
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 1
 
The Zero-ETL Approach: Enhancing Data Agility and Insight
The Zero-ETL Approach: Enhancing Data Agility and InsightThe Zero-ETL Approach: Enhancing Data Agility and Insight
The Zero-ETL Approach: Enhancing Data Agility and Insight
 
Patch notes explaining DISARM Version 1.4 update
Patch notes explaining DISARM Version 1.4 updatePatch notes explaining DISARM Version 1.4 update
Patch notes explaining DISARM Version 1.4 update
 
SheDev 2024
SheDev 2024SheDev 2024
SheDev 2024
 
GraphSummit Copenhagen 2024 - Neo4j Vision and Roadmap.pptx
GraphSummit Copenhagen 2024 - Neo4j Vision and Roadmap.pptxGraphSummit Copenhagen 2024 - Neo4j Vision and Roadmap.pptx
GraphSummit Copenhagen 2024 - Neo4j Vision and Roadmap.pptx
 
March Patch Tuesday
March Patch TuesdayMarch Patch Tuesday
March Patch Tuesday
 
Automation Ops Series: Session 2 - Governance for UiPath projects
Automation Ops Series: Session 2 - Governance for UiPath projectsAutomation Ops Series: Session 2 - Governance for UiPath projects
Automation Ops Series: Session 2 - Governance for UiPath projects
 
IT Service Management (ITSM) Best Practices for Advanced Computing
IT Service Management (ITSM) Best Practices for Advanced ComputingIT Service Management (ITSM) Best Practices for Advanced Computing
IT Service Management (ITSM) Best Practices for Advanced Computing
 
How to become a GDSC Lead GDSC MI AOE.pptx
How to become a GDSC Lead GDSC MI AOE.pptxHow to become a GDSC Lead GDSC MI AOE.pptx
How to become a GDSC Lead GDSC MI AOE.pptx
 
.NET 8 ChatBot with Azure OpenAI Services.pptx
.NET 8 ChatBot with Azure OpenAI Services.pptx.NET 8 ChatBot with Azure OpenAI Services.pptx
.NET 8 ChatBot with Azure OpenAI Services.pptx
 
20140402 - Smart house demo kit
20140402 - Smart house demo kit20140402 - Smart house demo kit
20140402 - Smart house demo kit
 
Extra-120324-Visite-Entreprise-icare.pdf
Extra-120324-Visite-Entreprise-icare.pdfExtra-120324-Visite-Entreprise-icare.pdf
Extra-120324-Visite-Entreprise-icare.pdf
 

Fib2010 article260 design & construction_rev_a

  • 1. Papanikolas, Stathopoulos-Vlamis 3rd fib International Congress – 2010 THE RION – ANTIRION BRIDGE: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION Panayotis Papanikolas, PhD, Vice-Chairman and Managing Director, GEFYRA S.A. – Concession Company for the Rion-Antirion Bridge, Greece Aris Stathopoulos-Vlamis, Structural Maintenance Manager, GEFYRA S.A. – Concession Company for the Rion-Antirion Bridge, Greece ABSTRACT The Rion-Antirion Bridge located in the Gulf of Corinth of Greece, was given to traffic in August 2004. As part of the Transeuropean Network, it links the Peloponnesus to Continental Greece over a stretch of water 2,500m wide. The project was awarded by the Greek government to GEFYRA S.A, a consortium led by VINCI and six Greek construction companies. It was the first concession contract in Greece, based on a financial scheme of build, operate and transfer. The environment in which the bridge was constructed combines a number of physical challenges and thus makes this project quite complex: deep water (up to 65 m) combined with deep soil strata of weak alluviums, possibility of strong seismic activity, tectonic movements and adverse high wind actions. The paper presents the innovative designs of the cable-stayed bridge, which include: shallow foundations on reinforced soil; continuous and fully suspended deck for the full length of the bridge (2.252 m); a huge dissipation system; stay cables equipped with special anti-seismic accessories; and offshore construction methods. Keywords: Cable Stayed Bridge, Inclusions, Seismic Dissipation System, Cantilever Construction
  • 2. Papanikolas, Stathopoulos-Vlamis 3rd fib International Congress – 2010 1 THE ENVIRONMENT The RION-ANTIRION Bridge is located between the Peloponnese and the continent over the Gulf of Corinth, Western Greece, and is intended to replace an existing ferry system. Its environment presents an exceptional combination of physical conditions, which makes this project quite complex: large water depth (up to 65m), deep soil strata of weak alluviums, strong seismic activity combined with possible tectonic movements, and adverse high wind actions. The structure spans a stretch of water of some 2500m. The seabed presents fairly steep slopes on each side and a long horizontal plateau at a depth of 60 to 70m. No bedrock was encountered during soil investigations down to a depth of 100m. Based on a geological study it is believed that the thickness of sediments is greater than 500m. General trends identified through soils surveys are the following: • a cohesionless layer is present at mudline level consisting of sand and gravel to a thickness of 4 to 7m, except under pier M4, where its thickness reaches 25m. • underneath this layer, the soil profile, rather erratic and heterogeneous, presents strata of sand, silty sand and silty clay. • below 30m, the soils are more homogeneous and mainly consist in silty clays or clays. In view of the nature of the soils, liquefaction does not appear to be a problem except on the north shore, where the first 20m are susceptible of liquefaction. The seismic conditions to be taken into account are presented in the form of a response spectrum at seabed level given in figure 1. The peak ground acceleration is equal to 0.48g and the maximum spectral acceleration is equal to 1.2g between periods of 0.2 and 1.0sec. This spectrum corresponds to a 2000-year return period, or 5% probability of exceedance for a life of 120 years. In Figure 1 the design spectrum of the Bridge is compared with the one required by Greek Seismic Code (EAK 2000) for the specific seismic zone of the bridge (III), with an importance factor of I=1.3. It is worth mentioning that the Peloponnese drifts away from mainland Greece by a few millimeters per year. Taking into account the 120 years design life of the bridge, contractual specifications require the bridge to accommodate possible fault movements up to 2m in any direction, horizontally and/or vertically between two adjacent piers, in addition with 1/500 vertical tilt of the pylons. The critical accidental seismic load combination consists of the specified earthquake combined with 50% of the tectonic movements.
  • 3. Papanikolas, Stathopoulos-Vlamis 3rd fib International Congress – 2010 2 0 0,3 0,6 0,9 1,2 1,5 0,0 1,0 2,0 3,0 4,0 5,0 Period [s] pseudoacceleration[g] EAK 2000 Seismic risk zone III Soil cat "Γ " 5% damping Importance factor I = 1,3 RION-ANTIRION E.A.K. Fig. 1 Design spectrum Due to the morphology of the surrounding mountains, the Rion-Antirion strait is known for the frequent and strong winds. The reference wind speed (hourly average, 10 meters high, 120 years return period) was estimated, from a large database of wind measurements, to be 32 m/sec. At deck level (57 meter above sea level) the reference wind speed is 50 m/sec. Flexible decks, however, such as cable-stay (i.e.Rion-Antirion Bridge) and suspension bridges are prone to aerodynamic instabilities. Existing standards require that the aerodynamic stability of flexible bridges with span larger than 200 meters be confirmed with aerodynamic tests. For the Rion-Antirion Bridge, the specifications required the critical wind speed for flutter instability to be higher than 74 m/sec, and that vortex shedding does not occur for speeds between 0 to 53 m/sec. In addition, the bridge is capable to withstand the impact from a 180000 dwt tanker sailing at 16 knots. This corresponds to an equivalent horizontal static load of 28000 tons applied at a height of 67m from the foundation (3m above normal water surface level). DESCRIPTION OF THE BRIDGE These difficult environmental conditions called for an original design based on large foundations able to sustain seismic forces and large spans in order to limit the number of these foundations. The bridge consists of: • the cable-stayed main bridge, 2252m long, built on 4 large foundations with a span distribution equal to 286m – 560m – 560m – 560m – 286m (Figure 2). • the approach viaducts, 1000m on Rion side (composite deck), the 392m being within the concession area and 239m on Antirion side (pre-stressed simple supported beams).
  • 4. Papanikolas, Stathopoulos-Vlamis 3rd fib International Congress – 2010 3 Fig. 2 Bridge elevation Foundations consist of large diameter (90m) caissons, resting on the seabed (Figure 3). The top 20m of soils are rather heterogeneous and of low mechanical characteristics. To provide sufficient shear strength to these soil strata, which have to carry large seismic forces coming from structural inertia forces and hydrodynamic water pressures, the upper soil layer is reinforced by inclusions. Fig. 3 Foundation and soil reinforcement with inclusions These inclusions are hollow steel pipes, 25 to 30m long, 2m in diameter, driven into the upper layer at a regular spacing of 7 to 8m (depending on the pier); about 150 to 200 pipes were driven in at each pier location. They are topped by a 3m thick, properly selected and leveled gravel layer, on which the foundations rest. These inclusions are not required under pier M4 owing to the presence of a thick natural gravel layer. The cable-stayed deck is a composite steel-concrete structure with a width of 27.2m, carrying two traffic lanes in each direction. The steel frame was made of two longitudinal plate girders 2.2m high on each side of the deck with transverse plate girders spaced at 4m and a concrete slab, 0.25 to 0.35m thick (Figure 4). On top, asphalt concrete pavement of 75mm thickness, including special waterproofing membrane, have been placed. The deck superstructure is continuous and fully suspended by means of stay cables for its total length of 2252 meters. In the longitudinal direction, the deck is free to accommodate all thermal and tectonic movements. At its extremities, expansion joints can accommodate the following movements:
  • 5. Papanikolas, Stathopoulos-Vlamis 3rd fib International Congress – 2010 4 • Under service conditions – in the longitudinal direction: opening +1.26m, closing – 1.22m, and • under an extreme seismic event: +2.81m to –2.2m in the longitudinal direction and ±2.5m in the transverse direction. Fig. 4 Typical deck cross section Each pylon is composed of four legs 4 x 4m, made of high strength concrete, joined at the top to give the rigidity necessary to support unsymmetrical service loads and seismic forces (Figure 5). The pylons are rigidly embedded in pier head to form a monolithic structure, up to 230m high, from sea bottom to pylon top. Fig. 5 Pier and pylon The stay cables, forming a semi-fan shape, are in two inclined arrangements, with their lower anchorages on deck sides and their upper anchorages at the pylon top. They are made of 43 to 73 parallel-galvanized strands individually protected with an extruded layer of HDPE. Finally, all strands are placed inside a HDPE duct. The cable stay system, which is supplied by Freyssinet, is equipped with special accessories related to it behaviour during a major earthquake. It includes wedge-blocking devices in case that the cable is unloaded and bending guiding tubes at the anchorage to control the curvature of the cable during earthquake oscillations. Following a close monitoring of the behaviour of the cables for wind induced vibrations, in 2006 (two years after operation) it was decided to improve the behaviour of cables, with length higher than 100m, by increasing the damping of the cable
  • 6. Papanikolas, Stathopoulos-Vlamis 3rd fib International Congress – 2010 5 system. This was achieved with the installation of external dampers close to the bottom anchorage (Figure 6). Fig. 6 Cable stays external hydraulic dampers Finally, conservatory measures were taken for future installation of internal dampers on the short cables and secondary cross-ties, in case that the cables experience any additional type of vibration. An innovative energy dissipation system connects the deck to the top of each pier and limits the lateral movement of the deck during the specified earthquake, while dissipating the seismic energy. The seismic protection system comprises fuse restraints and viscous dampers acting in parallel, connecting in the transverse direction the deck to the piers. The restrainers are designed as a rigid link intended to protect (to block) the hydraulic devices by withstanding the high wind loads up to a pre-determined force corresponding to a value slightly higher than the wind load ultimate limit state. Under an earthquake, the fuse restrainers are designed to yield, leaving the viscous dampers free to dissipate the energy induced by the earthquake into the structure. After the seismic event, new fuses can be re- installed in few weeks. DESIGN CONCEPT From the beginning it was clear that the critical load for most of the structure is the design seismic loading. The impact from the 180000 dwt tanker, equivalent to a static horizontal force of 280MN at sea level, creates shear forces and overturning moments smaller than seismic loads under the design spectrum and necessitates only local strengthening of piers in the impact zone. The choice of the present design was made after examination of a wide range of possible solutions in term of span type (suspension spans vs. cable-stayed spans) and foundation concepts. Particularly with regard to the foundations, the bearing capacity was a major concern in these difficult environmental conditions characterised by poor soil conditions,
  • 7. Papanikolas, Stathopoulos-Vlamis 3rd fib International Congress – 2010 6 significant seismic accelerations and large depth of water. Alternative foundation concepts (such as pile foundations, deep embedded caissons and soil substitution) were investigated with their relative merits in terms of economy, feasibility and technical soundness1 . This analysis showed that a shallow foundation was the most satisfactory solution as long as it was feasible to significantly improve the top 20m of soils. The improvement of the shear resistance of the soil was achieved by means of metallic inclusions, as described here above. Although these foundations resemble piled foundations, they do not at all behave as such: no connection exists between the inclusions and the caisson raft, which will allow for the foundation to uplift partially or to slide with respect to the soil; the density of inclusions is far more important and the length smaller than would have been the case in piled foundations. The major concept for the selected shallow foundation is that the forces of the structure will initially transferred through contact (mainly friction) to a gravel bed layer and then to the original soil that is reinforced with the metallic inclusions. The word “inclusion” was selected instead of “pile” in order to mark the difference in the foundation behavior. This type of soil reinforcement is quite innovative and necessitated extensive numerical studies and centrifuge model tests for its validation in the Laboratoire Central des Ponts et Chaussées (France). Another unique feature of this project lies in its continuous cable-stayed deck, which, in addition to being the longest in the world, is fully suspended. This creates an effective isolation system significantly reducing seismic forces in the deck and allowing the bridge to accommodate fault movements between adjacent piers thanks to its flexibility. In particular the 20 first natural periods of vibration of the deck are from 1.8 sec up to 7.2 sec, while the pier eigen-frequencies are around 0.55 sec. This feature allows low acceleration for the deck mass and thus lower forces on the piers. 0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 Period (sec) PseudoFrequencies(g) KME Spectrum DECK EIGENFREQUENCIES PYLON EIGENFREQUENCIES Fig. 7 Structure eigen-frequencies and KME spectrum In the transverse direction the deck will behave like a pendulum and its lateral movements must be buffered. This is achieved with the use of 4 hydraulic dampers at the pylon locations and two at the transition piers, having a capacity of 3500 kN each, operating both in tension and compression. They are able to limit the relative lateral displacements between the deck and the pylons and dissipate large amount of energy during a seismic event. The dynamic relative stroke between the deck and a pylon during an extreme seismic event will be in the order of 3.50m, with velocities up to 1.6m/sec. The constitutive law of the dampers is non-
  • 8. Papanikolas, Stathopoulos-Vlamis 3rd fib International Congress – 2010 7 linear viscous, with a velocity exponent of 0.15 (F=C.V0.15 , where C=3, V in m/sec and F in MN). The dissipation system (4 dampers, 2 on each side) installed between deck and a pier is illustrated in the next figure. In order to avoid deck transverse movements due to wind, a special metallic strut, called “fuse restrainer”, connects the deck and each pier. This lateral restrainer incorporates a mechanical device that fuses at ±10500kN. The function of this device is to allow transversal deck motion only after a seismic event of low occurrence enabling the dampers to go into action. Fig. 8 Dissipation system between deck and piers A prototype test for these dampers was performed in the CALTRANS testing facility at the University of California San Diego2 (Figure 9). Fig. 9 Prototype testing of hydraulic dampers at SRMD Facility (UCSD) The good performance of the dissipation system of the bridge was confirmed after a seismic event of a moment magnitude of Mw=6.5, that took place on June 08, 2008 with an epicenter located approximately 36km SW of the bridge and a focal depth of around 30km. The recorded peak ground acceleration was 0.13g, while the maximum estimated under the piers was 0.18g. The fuses yielded and the dampers operated with a maximum estimated velocity of 0.28m/sec and a maximum stroke of 15cm.
  • 9. Papanikolas, Stathopoulos-Vlamis 3rd fib International Congress – 2010 8 An expansion joint with special fuse elements was designed by Maurer Söhne to allow the maximum design movements of the main bridge to the approach viaducts. While the expansion joint accommodates a service movement of 1.22m closing, 1.26m opening in longitudinal and +/- 0.10m in lateral direction, it is designed for a maximum opening of 2.20m closing, 2.81m opening in longitudinal and +/- 2.50m in lateral direction for the specified design earthquake (Figure 10). During this seismic event fuse elements within the expansion joint will open to minimize the forces induced to the bridge structure and keep the expansion joint with minor damages. Several tests for these fuse elements were performed on a shaking table of the Enel.Hydro S.p.A. – B.U. ISMES in Bergamo (Italy). Fig. 10 Installation of MAURER expansion joint The capacity design of the structure for the extreme seismic event consisted of a “control damage” approach at the following locations: sliding at the foundation raft-soil interface, dissipation of energy by viscous dampers at pylon locations and potential formation of plastic hinges (with a minor damage of concrete spalling) at pylons legs. The dynamic response of the structure was estimated with artificial and natural accelerograms matching the design spectrum based on a non-linear time history analysis. This analysis took into account large displacements, hysteretic behaviour of materials, non-linear viscous behaviour of the dissipation system, sliding and uplifting elements at the raft-soil interface and a reological model for the soil-structure interaction1 . In addition to the 3D finite element analysis, a non-linear 3D push over analysis was performed for the 4 leg pylons in order to estimate their remaining capacity after the formation of plastic hinges and to confirm their ductile behaviour of the highly confined pylon legs. Special concrete confinement tests were also performed at the University of California San Diego on high strength concrete (C60/75) used for pylon legs in order to define its strain-stress curves (especially the reduced slope of the descending branch of the curves) for various confinement ratios.
  • 10. Papanikolas, Stathopoulos-Vlamis 3rd fib International Congress – 2010 9 CONSTRUCTION METHODS Construction methods for the foundations were those commonly used for the construction of offshore concrete platforms: • construction of the foundation footings in a dry dock up to a height of 15m in order to provide sufficient buoyancy; • towing and mooring of these footings at a wet dock site; • construction of the conical part of the foundations at the wet dock site; • towing and immersion of the foundations at final position. However, some features of this project made the construction process of its foundations quite exceptional. The dry dock has been established near the site. It was 200m long, 100m wide, 14m deep, and could accommodate the simultaneous construction of two foundations. It had an unusual closure system: the first foundation was built behind the protection of a dyke, but once towed out, the second foundation, the construction of which had already started, was floated to the front place and used as a dock gate. Fig. 11 Construction in dry dock Dredging the seabed, driving 500 inclusions, placing and leveling the gravel layer on the top, with a depth of water reaching 65m, was a major marine operation, which necessitated special equipment and procedures. In fact, a tension-leg barge has been custom-made, based on the well-known concept of tension-leg platforms but used for the first time for movable equipment. This concept was based on active vertical anchorage to dead weights lying on the seabed (Figure 12).
  • 11. Papanikolas, Stathopoulos-Vlamis 3rd fib International Congress – 2010 10 Fig. 12 Tension-leg barge The tension in these vertical anchor lines was adjusted in order to give the required stability to the barge with respect to sea movements and loads handled by the crane disposed on its deck. By increasing the tension in the anchor lines, the buoyancy of the barge allowed the anchor weights to be lifted from the seabed, then the barge, including its weights, could be floated away to a new position. As already stated, once completed the pier bases were towed then sunk at their final position. Compartments created in the footings by the radial beams were used to control trim by differential ballasting. Then the pier bases were filled with water to accelerate settlements, which are significant (between 0.1 and 0.2m). This pre-loading was maintained during pier shaft and pier head construction, thus allowing a correction for potential differential settlements before erecting pylons and deck superstructure. The deck of the main bridge was erected using the balanced free-cantilever technique, with prefabricated deck elements 12m long comprising also their concrete slab. The total weight of a prefabricated segment is 340 tons and was placed with a floating crane (TAKLIFT 7). The rate of erection of completed deck structure was up to 60m per week (Figure 13).
  • 12. Papanikolas, Stathopoulos-Vlamis 3rd fib International Congress – 2010 11 Fig. 6 Installation of a prefabricated deck segment CONCLUSIONS The Rion – Antirion Bridge had to overcome an exceptional combination of adverse environmental conditions: water depth up to 65m, deep soil strata of weak alluviums, strong seismic activity and tectonic movements. This resulted in a unique multi-span cable-stayed bridge with a continuous deck for the full length of the stretch (2252m), fully suspended from four pylons. Foundations consist in large diameter (90m) caissons resting on the seabed. The top 20m of soils are reinforced by means of metallic inclusions, based on an innovative concept. The design and construction of this € 800 million project have been undertaken under a private BOT scheme, led by the French company VINCI. The whole project was completed on summer 2004, ahead of the contractual deadline by several months (Figure 14). REFERENCES 1. Pecker, A., “A seismic foundation design process, Lessons learned from two major projects: The Vasco da Gama and the Rion-Antirion Bridges” ACI International Conference on Seismic Bridge Design and Retrofit, 2003, La Jolla, California. 2. Infanti S., Papanikolas P., Theodossopoulos G., “Rion-Antirion Bridge: Full-Scale Testing of Seismic Devices” fib 2003 Symposium, May 6-8, 2003, Athens, Greece.
  • 13. Papanikolas, Stathopoulos-Vlamis 3rd fib International Congress – 2010 12 Fig. 7 The Rion-Antirion Bridge close to completion (spring 2004)