SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 10
Descargar para leer sin conexión
Why Americans use social
media
Social networking sites are appealing as a way to
maintain contact with close ties and reconnect with old
friends

      Aaron Smith, Senior Research Specialist
      11/14/2011




http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Why-Americans-Use-Social-
Media.aspx




Pew Research Center
1615 L St., NW – Suite 700
Washington, D.C. 20036
202-419-4500 | pewinternet.org
Why Americans Use Online Social Media Tools
Two-thirds of online adults (66%) use social media platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, MySpace or
LinkedIn.1 These internet users say that connections with family members and friends (both new and
old) are a primary consideration in their adoption of social media tools. Roughly two thirds of social
media users say that staying in touch with current friends and family members is a major reason they
use these sites, while half say that connecting with old friends they’ve lost touch with is a major reason
behind their use of these technologies.

Other factors play a much smaller role—14% of users say that connecting around a shared hobby or
interest is a major reason they use social media, and 9% say that making new friends is equally
important. Reading comments by public figures and finding potential romantic partners are cited as
major factors by just 5% and 3% of social media users, respectively.


    Motivations for using social networking sites
    Based on adults who use social networking sites such as Facebook, MySpace, LinkedIn and/or Twitter

     100%
                  9%             13%            13%

       80%        24%
                                 23%                        50%          57%
                                                36%
       60%                                                                             74%
                                                                                                    84%


       40%
                  67%            64%                        35%
                                                50%                      34%
       20%
                                                                                       20%
                                                            14%                                     13%
                                                                          9%
        0%
                                                                                       5%            3%
               Staying in      Staying in   Connecting w/ Connecting Making new    Reading         Finding
                touch w/       touch w/       old friends with others w/ friends comments by      potential
             current friends     family      you've lost      shared              celebrities,   romantic or
                               members       touch with    hobbies or             athletes or       dating
                                                             interests            politicians      partners

                               Major reason           Minor reason        Not a reason
    Source: The Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project, April 26 – May 22, 2011 Spring
    Tracking Survey; n=2,277 adults ages 18 and older, including 755 cell phone interviews. Interviews were
    conducted in English and Spanish. Margin of error is +/-3 percentage points for SNS users (n=1,015)




1
 Throughout this report the term “social media users” refers to individuals who “use a social networking site like
MySpace, Facebook or LinkedIn” (65% of online adults do this) and/or “use Twitter” (13% of online adults).


http://pewinternet.org                                                                                         Page 2
Staying in touch with family members is a major factor across a range of social media users, but it’s
especially important to women

Those who say that keeping up with family members is a major consideration in their use of social
networking sites are a demographically diverse group. Two-thirds of all social media users cite family
connections as a major reason for their use of these tools, and there are no major differences on this
question in terms of age, income, education, race/ethnicity, parental status or place of residence. The
primary difference on this topic pertains to gender, as female social media users are more likely than
male users to cite family connections as a major reason for using these sites (72% vs. 55%).

Staying in touch with current friends and reconnecting with old friends is most relevant for those
under the age of 50

Compared with older adults, social media users under the age of 50 are especially likely to say that these
tools help them keep up with existing friends and reconnect with old ones—roughly seven in ten users
under the age of fifty say that staying in touch with current friends is a major reason they use online
social platforms, and just over half say that connecting with old friends they’ve lost touch with is equally
important. Each of these is significantly higher than comparable figures for users ages 50 and older,
although a relatively large number of older adults point to connections with friends as a major reason
for their social networking site usage as well.


       Staying in touch with current friends and reconnecting with old ones
       % of social networking site users within each group who say the following are a “major reason” for
       their use of social networking sites

          100%


            80%          71%     70%

                                         57%                              55%
            60%                                                    53%
                                                45%                               42%
            40%
                                                                                         30%

            20%


             0%
                     Staying in touch with current friends   Connecting with old friends you've lost
                                                                          touch with

                  18-29 (n=274)         30-49 (n=348)         50-64 (n=262)        65+ (n=110)
       Source: The Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project, April 26 – May 22, 2011
       Spring Tracking Survey; n=2,277 adults ages 18 and older, including 755 cell phone interviews.
       Interviews were conducted in English and Spanish. Margin of error is +/-3 percentage points for
       SNS users (n=1,015)


http://pewinternet.org                                                                                      Page 3
In addition to age, gender and parental status are linked with users’ attitudes towards social media as a
way to maintain connections with friends. Women are slightly more likely than men to say that staying
in touch with current friends is a major reason for using online social tools (70% vs. 63%) while parents
are more likely than non-parents to say that connecting with old friends is a major reason behind their
use of these sites (56% vs. 47%).

Compared with keeping tabs on current friends or old acquaintances, users place much less emphasis on
using social platforms to make entirely new friends—just 9% say this is a major reason they use these
sites, and 57% say that it is not a reason at all for their online social networking activity. Groups that are
more likely than average to use social media to make new friends include men (12% say that making
new friends is a major reason for using these sites), African Americans (15%), those who have a high
school diploma but have not attended college (16%) and those with an annual household income under
$30,000 (18%).

Middle-aged and older adults place a relatively high value on social media as a tool to connect with
others around a hobby and interest

Compared with maintaining or rekindling friendships, the ability to connect with others who share a
hobby or interest using social media resonates with a slightly older cohort of users. Sixteen percent of
30-49 year olds and 18% of 50-64 year olds cite connecting with others with common hobbies or
interests as a major reason they use social networking sites, compared with 10% of 18-29 year olds.

Additionally, men are a bit more likely than women to use these sites to connect around a hobby or
interest—56% of male users say that this is either a major or minor reason for their usage of these sites,
compared with 44% of female users.

Connecting with public figures online is relatively popular among Twitter users, as well as African
Americans and Latinos

Among social media users as a whole, the ability to read comments by public figures such as politicians,
celebrities or athletes does not come into play as a major factor—fully three quarters of users say that
this plays no role whatsoever in their decision to use these sites. And while connecting with public
figures has a relatively modest impact on users across a range of groups, both African Americans and
Latinos show more interest in this activity than white users. One in ten black social media users (10%)
and 11% of Latinos say that reading comments from public figures is a major reason for using these sites
(compared with just 3% of white users). Black and Latino social media users are also more likely to say
that this is a minor factor (31% of blacks and 26% of Latinos say this, compared with 16% of whites).




http://pewinternet.org                                                                                 Page 4
Reading comments by celebrities, politicians or athletes
         Based on adults who use Twitter and/or social networking sites such as Facebook, MySpace or
         LinkedIn

           100%



            80%

                                                         59%                        63%
            60%               80%


            40%


                                                         31%                        26%
            20%
                              16%
                                                         10%                        11%
             0%               3%
                         White (n=695)               Black (n=117)             Latino (n=115)

                            Major reason          Minor reason          Not a reason
         Source: The Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project, April 26 – May 22, 2011
         Spring Tracking Survey; n=2,277 adults ages 18 and older, including 755 cell phone interviews.
         Interviews were conducted in English and Spanish. Margin of error is +/-3 percentage points
         for SNS users (n=1,015)


Additionally, Twitter users are more interested in connecting with public figures than are social media
users who do not use Twitter. One in ten Twitter users (11%) say that reading comments by politicians,
celebrities or athletes is a major reason they use online social networks, and 30% say that this is a minor
reason for their usage of these sites. Each of these is notably higher than the average for social media
users who do not use Twitter (4% of these users say this is a major reason for using these sites, with 11%
citing it as a minor reason).

Finding potential dating partners is at most a minor element of the social media experience

Very few social media users say that finding potential romantic partners or people to date plays a role in
their use of these sites—overall more than eight in ten (84%) do not use these sites for that purpose at
all. Most of the remainder say that the prospect of romance is only a minor reason. Most differences on
this question are quite modest—for example, men are twice as likely as women to say that finding
potential dating or romantic partners is a minor reason for using online social platforms (17% vs. 9%) but
overall few men say that this is a major factor (just 4% do so).




http://pewinternet.org                                                                                    Page 5
To be sure, many Americans are currently in relationships or may not otherwise be seeking dating or
romantic partners in any venue (on social networking sites or otherwise). Among those users who
identify themselves as single, separated or divorced, 6% say that finding romantic or dating partners is a
major reason why they use these sites (an additional 27% say that this is a minor reason for their social
media usage).

About this survey

The results reported here are based on a national telephone survey of 2,277 adults conducted April 26-
May 22, 2011. 1,522 interviews were conducted by landline phone, and 755 interviews were conducted
by cell phone. Interviews were conducted in both English and Spanish. For results based on social
networking site users, the margin of error is +/-3 percentage points (n=1,015).




http://pewinternet.org                                                                              Page 6
Survey questions

Spring Change Assessment Survey 2011                                                              Final Topline            5/25/2011
Data for April 26–May 22, 2011

Princeton Survey Research Associates International
for the Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project

Sample: n= 2,277 national adults, age 18 and older, including 755 cell phone interviews
Interviewing dates: 04.26.2011 – 05.22.2011

Margin   of    error   is   plus   or   minus   2   percentage   points   for   results   based   on   Total [n=2,277]
Margin   of    error   is   plus   or   minus   3   percentage   points   for   results   based   on   internet users [n=1,701]
Margin   of    error   is   plus   or   minus   3   percentage   points   for   results   based   on   cell phone users [n=1,914]
Margin   of    error   is   plus   or   minus   3   percentage   points   for   results   based   on   SNS or Twitter users [n=1,015]




SNS10     People use social networking sites for a number of reasons. Please tell me if each of the
          following is a MAJOR reason you use these sites, a MINOR reason, or not a reason at all
          for you. (First,/Next,) [INSERT; RANDOMIZE].

          [READ FOR FIRST ITEM, THEN AS NECESSARY:] Is this a MAJOR reason you use social
          networking sites, a MINOR reason, or not a reason at all for you?

          Based on SNS or Twitter users [N=1,015]

                                                                                     MAJOR        MINOR        NOT A     DON’T
                                                                                    REASON        REASON      REASON     KNOW     REFUSED

          a.     Staying in touch with family members                                 64               23         13       *            *
          b.     Staying in touch with current friends                                67               24         9        *            *
          c.     Connecting with old friends that you lost
                 touch with                                                           50               36         13       *            *
          d.     Making new friends                                                       9            34         57       *            *
          e.     Connecting with other people who share your
                 hobbies or interests                                                 14               35         50       0            *
          f.     Reading comments or posts by celebrities,
                 politicians or athletes                                                  5            20         74       *            *
          g.     Finding potential romantic partners or people
                 you might like to date                                                   3            13         84       *            *




http://pewinternet.org                                                                                                              Page 7
Methodology
This report is based on the findings of a survey on Americans' use of the Internet. The results in this
report are based on data from telephone interviews conducted by Princeton Survey Research Associates
International from April 26 to May 22, 2011, among a sample of 2,277 adults, age 18 and older.
Telephone interviews were conducted in English and Spanish by landline (1,522) and cell phone (755,
including 346 without a landline phone). For results based on the total sample, one can say with 95%
confidence that the error attributable to sampling is plus or minus 2.4 percentage points. For results
based Internet users (n=1,701), the margin of sampling error is plus or minus 2.7 percentage points. In
addition to sampling error, question wording and practical difficulties in conducting telephone surveys
may introduce some error or bias into the findings of opinion polls.

A combination of landline and cellular random digit dial (RDD) samples was used to represent all adults
in the continental United States who have access to either a landline or cellular telephone. Both samples
were provided by Survey Sampling International, LLC (SSI) according to PSRAI specifications. Numbers
for the landline sample were selected with probabilities in proportion to their share of listed telephone
households from active blocks (area code + exchange + two-digit block number) that contained three or
more residential directory listings. The cellular sample was not list-assisted, but was drawn through a
systematic sampling from dedicated wireless 100-blocks and shared service 100-blocks with no
directory-listed landline numbers.

New sample was released daily and was kept in the field for at least five days. The sample was released
in replicates, which are representative subsamples of the larger population. This ensures that complete
call procedures were followed for the entire sample. At least 7 attempts were made to complete an
interview at a sampled telephone number. The calls were staggered over times of day and days of the
week to maximize the chances of making contact with a potential respondent. Each number received at
least one daytime call in an attempt to find someone available. For the landline sample, interviewers
asked to speak with the youngest adult male or female currently at home based on a random rotation. If
no male/female was available, interviewers asked to speak with the youngest adult of the other gender.
For the cellular sample, interviews were conducted with the person who answered the phone.
Interviewers verified that the person was an adult and in a safe place before administering the survey.
Cellular sample respondents were offered a post-paid cash incentive for their participation. All
interviews completed on any given day were considered to be the final sample for that day.

Weighting is generally used in survey analysis to compensate for sample designs and patterns of non-
response that might bias results. A two-stage weighting procedure was used to weight this dual-frame
sample. The first-stage weight is the product of two adjustments made to the data – a Probability of
Selection Adjustment (PSA) and a Phone Use Adjustment (PUA). The PSA corrects for the fact that
respondents in the landline sample have different probabilities of being sampled depending on how
many adults live in the household. The PUA corrects for the overlapping landline and cellular sample
frames.




http://pewinternet.org                                                                            Page 8
The second stage of weighting balances sample demographics to population parameters. The sample is
balanced by form to match national population parameters for sex, age, education, race, Hispanic origin,
region (U.S. Census definitions), population density, and telephone usage. The White, non-Hispanic
subgroup is also balanced on age, education and region. The basic weighting parameters came from a
special analysis of the Census Bureau’s 2010 Annual Social and Economic Supplement (ASEC) that
included all households in the continental United States. The population density parameter was derived
from Census 2000 data. The cell phone usage parameter came from an analysis of the January-June
2010 National Health Interview Survey. Following is the full disposition of all sampled telephone
numbers:

                   Table 2:Sample Disposition
                   Landline         Cell
                    32,909       19,899     Total Numbers Dialed

                      1,416         364     Non-residential
                      1,428           35    Computer/Fax
                         32          ----   Cell phone
                     16,833       8,660     Other not working
                      1,629         287     Additional projected not working
                     11,571      10,553     Working numbers
                     35.2%       53.0%      Working Rate

                         543         96     No Answer / Busy
                       3,091      3,555     Voice Mail
                          53         10     Other Non-Contact
                       7,884      6,892     Contacted numbers
                      68.1%      65.3%      Contact Rate

                         489      1,055     Callback
                       5,757      4,618     Refusal
                       1,638      1,219     Cooperating numbers
                      20.8%      17.7%      Cooperation Rate

                           56        33     Language Barrier
                          ----     426      Child's cell phone
                       1,582       760      Eligible numbers
                      96.6%      62.3%      Eligibility Rate

                          60         5      Break-off
                       1,522       755      Completes
                      96.2%      99.3%      Completion Rate

                      13.6%      11.5%      Response Rate




http://pewinternet.org                                                                           Page 9
The disposition reports all of the sampled telephone numbers ever dialed from the original telephone
number samples. The response rate estimates the fraction of all eligible respondents in the sample that
were ultimately interviewed. At PSRAI it is calculated by taking the product of three component rates:

       Contact rate – the proportion of working numbers where a request for interview was made
       Cooperation rate – the proportion of contacted numbers where a consent for interview was at
        least initially obtained, versus those refused
       Completion rate – the proportion of initially cooperating and eligible interviews that were
        completed

Thus the response rate for the landline sample was 13.6 percent. The response rate for the cellular
sample was 11.5 percent.




http://pewinternet.org                                                                           Page 10

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente

How & Why - Social Media for Emergencies
How & Why - Social Media for EmergenciesHow & Why - Social Media for Emergencies
How & Why - Social Media for Emergencies
EPI2oh
 
Unicast what wome nwant from internet Unicst 2010
Unicast what wome nwant from internet Unicst 2010Unicast what wome nwant from internet Unicst 2010
Unicast what wome nwant from internet Unicst 2010
Mitya Voskresensky
 

La actualidad más candente (16)

Youth exposure to pornography and violent web sites
Youth exposure to pornography and violent web sitesYouth exposure to pornography and violent web sites
Youth exposure to pornography and violent web sites
 
Social mediaslidedeck
Social mediaslidedeckSocial mediaslidedeck
Social mediaslidedeck
 
How & Why - Social Media for Emergencies
How & Why - Social Media for EmergenciesHow & Why - Social Media for Emergencies
How & Why - Social Media for Emergencies
 
Teen Content Creators
Teen Content CreatorsTeen Content Creators
Teen Content Creators
 
Young Women - Relationships
Young Women - RelationshipsYoung Women - Relationships
Young Women - Relationships
 
Millennials 2.0 - Relationships
Millennials 2.0 - RelationshipsMillennials 2.0 - Relationships
Millennials 2.0 - Relationships
 
WoM: Mom-Fluentials - Harnessing the Power of Moms
WoM: Mom-Fluentials - Harnessing the Power of MomsWoM: Mom-Fluentials - Harnessing the Power of Moms
WoM: Mom-Fluentials - Harnessing the Power of Moms
 
Teens, trends in communications and revolutions
Teens, trends in communications and revolutionsTeens, trends in communications and revolutions
Teens, trends in communications and revolutions
 
Whos not-online-and-why
Whos not-online-and-whyWhos not-online-and-why
Whos not-online-and-why
 
Unicast what wome nwant from internet Unicst 2010
Unicast what wome nwant from internet Unicst 2010Unicast what wome nwant from internet Unicst 2010
Unicast what wome nwant from internet Unicst 2010
 
Teens, Social Media & Technology Overview 2015
Teens, Social Media & Technology Overview 2015Teens, Social Media & Technology Overview 2015
Teens, Social Media & Technology Overview 2015
 
Pip Social Media And Young Adults Report
Pip Social Media And Young Adults ReportPip Social Media And Young Adults Report
Pip Social Media And Young Adults Report
 
Final survey report of ovaw 2017 by sajina karki and shreedeep rayamajhi
Final survey report of ovaw 2017 by sajina karki and shreedeep rayamajhiFinal survey report of ovaw 2017 by sajina karki and shreedeep rayamajhi
Final survey report of ovaw 2017 by sajina karki and shreedeep rayamajhi
 
This is your brain on DOPA
This is your brain on DOPAThis is your brain on DOPA
This is your brain on DOPA
 
Teens, Online Stranger Contact & Cyberbullying
Teens, Online Stranger Contact & CyberbullyingTeens, Online Stranger Contact & Cyberbullying
Teens, Online Stranger Contact & Cyberbullying
 
Pew Research Study on Online Dating 021116
Pew Research Study on Online Dating 021116Pew Research Study on Online Dating 021116
Pew Research Study on Online Dating 021116
 

Destacado

Final Presentation
Final PresentationFinal Presentation
Final Presentation
lmkahn
 
Journalist Involvement in Comment Sections
Journalist Involvement  in Comment SectionsJournalist Involvement  in Comment Sections
Journalist Involvement in Comment Sections
Genaro Bardy
 
The role of content - nielsen
The role of content - nielsenThe role of content - nielsen
The role of content - nielsen
Genaro Bardy
 
Deloitte Digital Democracy 2014
Deloitte Digital Democracy 2014Deloitte Digital Democracy 2014
Deloitte Digital Democracy 2014
Genaro Bardy
 

Destacado (15)

cagüitasbonense
cagüitasbonensecagüitasbonense
cagüitasbonense
 
Sme
SmeSme
Sme
 
Forex buffalo forum-Commodity Channel Index in Forex Trading
Forex buffalo forum-Commodity Channel Index in Forex TradingForex buffalo forum-Commodity Channel Index in Forex Trading
Forex buffalo forum-Commodity Channel Index in Forex Trading
 
Marketing made more agile
Marketing made more agileMarketing made more agile
Marketing made more agile
 
Final Presentation
Final PresentationFinal Presentation
Final Presentation
 
General Information On Medical Supply
General Information On Medical SupplyGeneral Information On Medical Supply
General Information On Medical Supply
 
Social networking 2013
Social networking 2013Social networking 2013
Social networking 2013
 
The value of content
The value of contentThe value of content
The value of content
 
Democratic Republic of Congo--2011 FDA Global Electoral Audit Report
Democratic Republic of Congo--2011 FDA Global Electoral Audit Report Democratic Republic of Congo--2011 FDA Global Electoral Audit Report
Democratic Republic of Congo--2011 FDA Global Electoral Audit Report
 
Journalist Involvement in Comment Sections
Journalist Involvement  in Comment SectionsJournalist Involvement  in Comment Sections
Journalist Involvement in Comment Sections
 
The role of content - nielsen
The role of content - nielsenThe role of content - nielsen
The role of content - nielsen
 
Photojournalisme en 2015 - Etude SCAM
Photojournalisme en 2015 - Etude SCAMPhotojournalisme en 2015 - Etude SCAM
Photojournalisme en 2015 - Etude SCAM
 
Global Brands 2014 report by WPP
Global Brands 2014 report by WPPGlobal Brands 2014 report by WPP
Global Brands 2014 report by WPP
 
Deloitte Digital Democracy 2014
Deloitte Digital Democracy 2014Deloitte Digital Democracy 2014
Deloitte Digital Democracy 2014
 
What is deficit financing
What is deficit financingWhat is deficit financing
What is deficit financing
 

Similar a Why americans use social media

Pew internet older adults and social media
Pew internet   older adults and social mediaPew internet   older adults and social media
Pew internet older adults and social media
Sumit Roy
 
¿Qué hacen los adolescentes en Redes Sociales?
¿Qué hacen los adolescentes en Redes Sociales?¿Qué hacen los adolescentes en Redes Sociales?
¿Qué hacen los adolescentes en Redes Sociales?
ADCENTRAL
 
Social Networking in ireland an amárach report - august 2010
Social Networking in ireland   an amárach report - august 2010Social Networking in ireland   an amárach report - august 2010
Social Networking in ireland an amárach report - august 2010
Amarach Research
 

Similar a Why americans use social media (20)

Teens, Kindness and Cruelty on Social Network Sites
Teens, Kindness and Cruelty on Social Network SitesTeens, Kindness and Cruelty on Social Network Sites
Teens, Kindness and Cruelty on Social Network Sites
 
Pew internet older adults and social media
Pew internet   older adults and social mediaPew internet   older adults and social media
Pew internet older adults and social media
 
Pew internet older adults and social media
Pew internet  older adults and social mediaPew internet  older adults and social media
Pew internet older adults and social media
 
Pew internet older adults and social media
Pew internet   older adults and social mediaPew internet   older adults and social media
Pew internet older adults and social media
 
¿Qué hacen los adolescentes en Redes Sociales?
¿Qué hacen los adolescentes en Redes Sociales?¿Qué hacen los adolescentes en Redes Sociales?
¿Qué hacen los adolescentes en Redes Sociales?
 
Teens, Social Media, and Privacy Infographic
Teens, Social Media, and Privacy InfographicTeens, Social Media, and Privacy Infographic
Teens, Social Media, and Privacy Infographic
 
Mobile is the needle; Social is the thread
Mobile is the needle; Social is the threadMobile is the needle; Social is the thread
Mobile is the needle; Social is the thread
 
Amaze generation phase 2 final - October 2013
Amaze generation phase 2 final - October 2013Amaze generation phase 2 final - October 2013
Amaze generation phase 2 final - October 2013
 
MSL Germany's Healthcare Survey 2012 - News From the Virtual Waiting Room
MSL Germany's Healthcare Survey 2012 - News From the Virtual Waiting RoomMSL Germany's Healthcare Survey 2012 - News From the Virtual Waiting Room
MSL Germany's Healthcare Survey 2012 - News From the Virtual Waiting Room
 
MSL Germany's Healthcare Survey 2012 - News From the Virtual Waiting Room
MSL Germany's Healthcare Survey 2012 - News From the Virtual Waiting RoomMSL Germany's Healthcare Survey 2012 - News From the Virtual Waiting Room
MSL Germany's Healthcare Survey 2012 - News From the Virtual Waiting Room
 
High Ed Web Ark - E-Expectations #hewebar
High Ed Web Ark - E-Expectations #hewebarHigh Ed Web Ark - E-Expectations #hewebar
High Ed Web Ark - E-Expectations #hewebar
 
Reaching Your Audience in the Digital Age: Key Research Trends to Watch
Reaching Your Audience in the Digital Age: Key Research Trends to WatchReaching Your Audience in the Digital Age: Key Research Trends to Watch
Reaching Your Audience in the Digital Age: Key Research Trends to Watch
 
2012 Random Student Insights from New Zealand
2012 Random Student Insights from New Zealand2012 Random Student Insights from New Zealand
2012 Random Student Insights from New Zealand
 
What people living with rare disease can teach us
What people living with rare disease can teach usWhat people living with rare disease can teach us
What people living with rare disease can teach us
 
OCPRA 2012: E-expectations Presentation
OCPRA 2012: E-expectations PresentationOCPRA 2012: E-expectations Presentation
OCPRA 2012: E-expectations Presentation
 
Teens 2012: Truth, Trends, and Myths About Teen Online Behavior
Teens 2012: Truth, Trends, and Myths About Teen Online BehaviorTeens 2012: Truth, Trends, and Myths About Teen Online Behavior
Teens 2012: Truth, Trends, and Myths About Teen Online Behavior
 
Social Networking in ireland an amárach report - august 2010
Social Networking in ireland   an amárach report - august 2010Social Networking in ireland   an amárach report - august 2010
Social Networking in ireland an amárach report - august 2010
 
Social Networking in Ireland - an Amrach report August2010
Social Networking in Ireland - an Amrach report August2010Social Networking in Ireland - an Amrach report August2010
Social Networking in Ireland - an Amrach report August2010
 
E expectations 2012 for Chapman University
E expectations 2012 for Chapman UniversityE expectations 2012 for Chapman University
E expectations 2012 for Chapman University
 
Mom vs. Machine
Mom vs. MachineMom vs. Machine
Mom vs. Machine
 

Más de Genaro Bardy

Etude ipsos google global smartphone
Etude ipsos google global smartphoneEtude ipsos google global smartphone
Etude ipsos google global smartphone
Genaro Bardy
 
La diffusion des technologies de l’information et de la communication dans la...
La diffusion des technologies de l’information et de la communication dans la...La diffusion des technologies de l’information et de la communication dans la...
La diffusion des technologies de l’information et de la communication dans la...
Genaro Bardy
 

Más de Genaro Bardy (20)

Bunkr - Forget Powerpoint
Bunkr - Forget PowerpointBunkr - Forget Powerpoint
Bunkr - Forget Powerpoint
 
Guide dutilisation pédagogique des médias sociaux
Guide dutilisation pédagogique des médias sociauxGuide dutilisation pédagogique des médias sociaux
Guide dutilisation pédagogique des médias sociaux
 
Etude ipsos google global smartphone
Etude ipsos google global smartphoneEtude ipsos google global smartphone
Etude ipsos google global smartphone
 
La diffusion des technologies de l’information et de la communication dans la...
La diffusion des technologies de l’information et de la communication dans la...La diffusion des technologies de l’information et de la communication dans la...
La diffusion des technologies de l’information et de la communication dans la...
 
Social Customer Lifecycle
Social Customer LifecycleSocial Customer Lifecycle
Social Customer Lifecycle
 
The Social Media Ecosystem Report by IAB
The Social Media Ecosystem Report by IABThe Social Media Ecosystem Report by IAB
The Social Media Ecosystem Report by IAB
 
Excuses Ikea - Catalogue Arabie Saoudite
Excuses Ikea - Catalogue Arabie SaouditeExcuses Ikea - Catalogue Arabie Saoudite
Excuses Ikea - Catalogue Arabie Saoudite
 
Eurobrand 2012 france top 10
Eurobrand 2012 france top 10Eurobrand 2012 france top 10
Eurobrand 2012 france top 10
 
Eurobrand 2012 europe top 10
Eurobrand 2012 europe top 10Eurobrand 2012 europe top 10
Eurobrand 2012 europe top 10
 
Eurobrand 2012 global top 100
Eurobrand 2012 global top 100Eurobrand 2012 global top 100
Eurobrand 2012 global top 100
 
Emploi sur Internet - Livre blanc
Emploi sur Internet - Livre blancEmploi sur Internet - Livre blanc
Emploi sur Internet - Livre blanc
 
Livre blanc observatoire marketing digital sas idc 2012
Livre blanc observatoire marketing digital sas idc 2012Livre blanc observatoire marketing digital sas idc 2012
Livre blanc observatoire marketing digital sas idc 2012
 
Display business trends publisher edition by Google
Display business trends publisher edition by GoogleDisplay business trends publisher edition by Google
Display business trends publisher edition by Google
 
etude popai
etude popaietude popai
etude popai
 
Brandz 2012 top 100
Brandz 2012 top 100Brandz 2012 top 100
Brandz 2012 top 100
 
CGA skyboard
CGA skyboardCGA skyboard
CGA skyboard
 
SOCIALLY ENGAGED COMPANIES$SEE 4X GREATER BUSINESS IMPACT
SOCIALLY ENGAGED COMPANIES$SEE 4X GREATER BUSINESS IMPACTSOCIALLY ENGAGED COMPANIES$SEE 4X GREATER BUSINESS IMPACT
SOCIALLY ENGAGED COMPANIES$SEE 4X GREATER BUSINESS IMPACT
 
Luxury Marketing Outlook 2012
Luxury Marketing Outlook 2012Luxury Marketing Outlook 2012
Luxury Marketing Outlook 2012
 
Leading Transformation
Leading TransformationLeading Transformation
Leading Transformation
 
New Facebook Brand Pages: A first look at usability
New Facebook Brand Pages: A first look at usabilityNew Facebook Brand Pages: A first look at usability
New Facebook Brand Pages: A first look at usability
 

Último

Russian Call Girls In Gurgaon ❤️8448577510 ⊹Best Escorts Service In 24/7 Delh...
Russian Call Girls In Gurgaon ❤️8448577510 ⊹Best Escorts Service In 24/7 Delh...Russian Call Girls In Gurgaon ❤️8448577510 ⊹Best Escorts Service In 24/7 Delh...
Russian Call Girls In Gurgaon ❤️8448577510 ⊹Best Escorts Service In 24/7 Delh...
lizamodels9
 
Call Girls From Pari Chowk Greater Noida ❤️8448577510 ⊹Best Escorts Service I...
Call Girls From Pari Chowk Greater Noida ❤️8448577510 ⊹Best Escorts Service I...Call Girls From Pari Chowk Greater Noida ❤️8448577510 ⊹Best Escorts Service I...
Call Girls From Pari Chowk Greater Noida ❤️8448577510 ⊹Best Escorts Service I...
lizamodels9
 
Call Girls Kengeri Satellite Town Just Call 👗 7737669865 👗 Top Class Call Gir...
Call Girls Kengeri Satellite Town Just Call 👗 7737669865 👗 Top Class Call Gir...Call Girls Kengeri Satellite Town Just Call 👗 7737669865 👗 Top Class Call Gir...
Call Girls Kengeri Satellite Town Just Call 👗 7737669865 👗 Top Class Call Gir...
amitlee9823
 
FULL ENJOY Call Girls In Mahipalpur Delhi Contact Us 8377877756
FULL ENJOY Call Girls In Mahipalpur Delhi Contact Us 8377877756FULL ENJOY Call Girls In Mahipalpur Delhi Contact Us 8377877756
FULL ENJOY Call Girls In Mahipalpur Delhi Contact Us 8377877756
dollysharma2066
 
Call Girls In DLf Gurgaon ➥99902@11544 ( Best price)100% Genuine Escort In 24...
Call Girls In DLf Gurgaon ➥99902@11544 ( Best price)100% Genuine Escort In 24...Call Girls In DLf Gurgaon ➥99902@11544 ( Best price)100% Genuine Escort In 24...
Call Girls In DLf Gurgaon ➥99902@11544 ( Best price)100% Genuine Escort In 24...
lizamodels9
 
unwanted pregnancy Kit [+918133066128] Abortion Pills IN Dubai UAE Abudhabi
unwanted pregnancy Kit [+918133066128] Abortion Pills IN Dubai UAE Abudhabiunwanted pregnancy Kit [+918133066128] Abortion Pills IN Dubai UAE Abudhabi
unwanted pregnancy Kit [+918133066128] Abortion Pills IN Dubai UAE Abudhabi
Abortion pills in Kuwait Cytotec pills in Kuwait
 

Último (20)

Russian Call Girls In Gurgaon ❤️8448577510 ⊹Best Escorts Service In 24/7 Delh...
Russian Call Girls In Gurgaon ❤️8448577510 ⊹Best Escorts Service In 24/7 Delh...Russian Call Girls In Gurgaon ❤️8448577510 ⊹Best Escorts Service In 24/7 Delh...
Russian Call Girls In Gurgaon ❤️8448577510 ⊹Best Escorts Service In 24/7 Delh...
 
A DAY IN THE LIFE OF A SALESMAN / WOMAN
A DAY IN THE LIFE OF A  SALESMAN / WOMANA DAY IN THE LIFE OF A  SALESMAN / WOMAN
A DAY IN THE LIFE OF A SALESMAN / WOMAN
 
👉Chandigarh Call Girls 👉9878799926👉Just Call👉Chandigarh Call Girl In Chandiga...
👉Chandigarh Call Girls 👉9878799926👉Just Call👉Chandigarh Call Girl In Chandiga...👉Chandigarh Call Girls 👉9878799926👉Just Call👉Chandigarh Call Girl In Chandiga...
👉Chandigarh Call Girls 👉9878799926👉Just Call👉Chandigarh Call Girl In Chandiga...
 
Call Girls In Panjim North Goa 9971646499 Genuine Service
Call Girls In Panjim North Goa 9971646499 Genuine ServiceCall Girls In Panjim North Goa 9971646499 Genuine Service
Call Girls In Panjim North Goa 9971646499 Genuine Service
 
Call Girls Zirakpur👧 Book Now📱7837612180 📞👉Call Girl Service In Zirakpur No A...
Call Girls Zirakpur👧 Book Now📱7837612180 📞👉Call Girl Service In Zirakpur No A...Call Girls Zirakpur👧 Book Now📱7837612180 📞👉Call Girl Service In Zirakpur No A...
Call Girls Zirakpur👧 Book Now📱7837612180 📞👉Call Girl Service In Zirakpur No A...
 
(Anamika) VIP Call Girls Napur Call Now 8617697112 Napur Escorts 24x7
(Anamika) VIP Call Girls Napur Call Now 8617697112 Napur Escorts 24x7(Anamika) VIP Call Girls Napur Call Now 8617697112 Napur Escorts 24x7
(Anamika) VIP Call Girls Napur Call Now 8617697112 Napur Escorts 24x7
 
Call Girls Service In Old Town Dubai ((0551707352)) Old Town Dubai Call Girl ...
Call Girls Service In Old Town Dubai ((0551707352)) Old Town Dubai Call Girl ...Call Girls Service In Old Town Dubai ((0551707352)) Old Town Dubai Call Girl ...
Call Girls Service In Old Town Dubai ((0551707352)) Old Town Dubai Call Girl ...
 
Call Girls From Pari Chowk Greater Noida ❤️8448577510 ⊹Best Escorts Service I...
Call Girls From Pari Chowk Greater Noida ❤️8448577510 ⊹Best Escorts Service I...Call Girls From Pari Chowk Greater Noida ❤️8448577510 ⊹Best Escorts Service I...
Call Girls From Pari Chowk Greater Noida ❤️8448577510 ⊹Best Escorts Service I...
 
Phases of Negotiation .pptx
 Phases of Negotiation .pptx Phases of Negotiation .pptx
Phases of Negotiation .pptx
 
Call Girls Kengeri Satellite Town Just Call 👗 7737669865 👗 Top Class Call Gir...
Call Girls Kengeri Satellite Town Just Call 👗 7737669865 👗 Top Class Call Gir...Call Girls Kengeri Satellite Town Just Call 👗 7737669865 👗 Top Class Call Gir...
Call Girls Kengeri Satellite Town Just Call 👗 7737669865 👗 Top Class Call Gir...
 
Cracking the Cultural Competence Code.pptx
Cracking the Cultural Competence Code.pptxCracking the Cultural Competence Code.pptx
Cracking the Cultural Competence Code.pptx
 
Enhancing and Restoring Safety & Quality Cultures - Dave Litwiller - May 2024...
Enhancing and Restoring Safety & Quality Cultures - Dave Litwiller - May 2024...Enhancing and Restoring Safety & Quality Cultures - Dave Litwiller - May 2024...
Enhancing and Restoring Safety & Quality Cultures - Dave Litwiller - May 2024...
 
FULL ENJOY Call Girls In Mahipalpur Delhi Contact Us 8377877756
FULL ENJOY Call Girls In Mahipalpur Delhi Contact Us 8377877756FULL ENJOY Call Girls In Mahipalpur Delhi Contact Us 8377877756
FULL ENJOY Call Girls In Mahipalpur Delhi Contact Us 8377877756
 
Call Girls In DLf Gurgaon ➥99902@11544 ( Best price)100% Genuine Escort In 24...
Call Girls In DLf Gurgaon ➥99902@11544 ( Best price)100% Genuine Escort In 24...Call Girls In DLf Gurgaon ➥99902@11544 ( Best price)100% Genuine Escort In 24...
Call Girls In DLf Gurgaon ➥99902@11544 ( Best price)100% Genuine Escort In 24...
 
Dr. Admir Softic_ presentation_Green Club_ENG.pdf
Dr. Admir Softic_ presentation_Green Club_ENG.pdfDr. Admir Softic_ presentation_Green Club_ENG.pdf
Dr. Admir Softic_ presentation_Green Club_ENG.pdf
 
Call Girls Ludhiana Just Call 98765-12871 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Ludhiana Just Call 98765-12871 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Ludhiana Just Call 98765-12871 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Ludhiana Just Call 98765-12871 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
 
unwanted pregnancy Kit [+918133066128] Abortion Pills IN Dubai UAE Abudhabi
unwanted pregnancy Kit [+918133066128] Abortion Pills IN Dubai UAE Abudhabiunwanted pregnancy Kit [+918133066128] Abortion Pills IN Dubai UAE Abudhabi
unwanted pregnancy Kit [+918133066128] Abortion Pills IN Dubai UAE Abudhabi
 
Katrina Personal Brand Project and portfolio 1
Katrina Personal Brand Project and portfolio 1Katrina Personal Brand Project and portfolio 1
Katrina Personal Brand Project and portfolio 1
 
Falcon Invoice Discounting: The best investment platform in india for investors
Falcon Invoice Discounting: The best investment platform in india for investorsFalcon Invoice Discounting: The best investment platform in india for investors
Falcon Invoice Discounting: The best investment platform in india for investors
 
RSA Conference Exhibitor List 2024 - Exhibitors Data
RSA Conference Exhibitor List 2024 - Exhibitors DataRSA Conference Exhibitor List 2024 - Exhibitors Data
RSA Conference Exhibitor List 2024 - Exhibitors Data
 

Why americans use social media

  • 1. Why Americans use social media Social networking sites are appealing as a way to maintain contact with close ties and reconnect with old friends Aaron Smith, Senior Research Specialist 11/14/2011 http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Why-Americans-Use-Social- Media.aspx Pew Research Center 1615 L St., NW – Suite 700 Washington, D.C. 20036 202-419-4500 | pewinternet.org
  • 2. Why Americans Use Online Social Media Tools Two-thirds of online adults (66%) use social media platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, MySpace or LinkedIn.1 These internet users say that connections with family members and friends (both new and old) are a primary consideration in their adoption of social media tools. Roughly two thirds of social media users say that staying in touch with current friends and family members is a major reason they use these sites, while half say that connecting with old friends they’ve lost touch with is a major reason behind their use of these technologies. Other factors play a much smaller role—14% of users say that connecting around a shared hobby or interest is a major reason they use social media, and 9% say that making new friends is equally important. Reading comments by public figures and finding potential romantic partners are cited as major factors by just 5% and 3% of social media users, respectively. Motivations for using social networking sites Based on adults who use social networking sites such as Facebook, MySpace, LinkedIn and/or Twitter 100% 9% 13% 13% 80% 24% 23% 50% 57% 36% 60% 74% 84% 40% 67% 64% 35% 50% 34% 20% 20% 14% 13% 9% 0% 5% 3% Staying in Staying in Connecting w/ Connecting Making new Reading Finding touch w/ touch w/ old friends with others w/ friends comments by potential current friends family you've lost shared celebrities, romantic or members touch with hobbies or athletes or dating interests politicians partners Major reason Minor reason Not a reason Source: The Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project, April 26 – May 22, 2011 Spring Tracking Survey; n=2,277 adults ages 18 and older, including 755 cell phone interviews. Interviews were conducted in English and Spanish. Margin of error is +/-3 percentage points for SNS users (n=1,015) 1 Throughout this report the term “social media users” refers to individuals who “use a social networking site like MySpace, Facebook or LinkedIn” (65% of online adults do this) and/or “use Twitter” (13% of online adults). http://pewinternet.org Page 2
  • 3. Staying in touch with family members is a major factor across a range of social media users, but it’s especially important to women Those who say that keeping up with family members is a major consideration in their use of social networking sites are a demographically diverse group. Two-thirds of all social media users cite family connections as a major reason for their use of these tools, and there are no major differences on this question in terms of age, income, education, race/ethnicity, parental status or place of residence. The primary difference on this topic pertains to gender, as female social media users are more likely than male users to cite family connections as a major reason for using these sites (72% vs. 55%). Staying in touch with current friends and reconnecting with old friends is most relevant for those under the age of 50 Compared with older adults, social media users under the age of 50 are especially likely to say that these tools help them keep up with existing friends and reconnect with old ones—roughly seven in ten users under the age of fifty say that staying in touch with current friends is a major reason they use online social platforms, and just over half say that connecting with old friends they’ve lost touch with is equally important. Each of these is significantly higher than comparable figures for users ages 50 and older, although a relatively large number of older adults point to connections with friends as a major reason for their social networking site usage as well. Staying in touch with current friends and reconnecting with old ones % of social networking site users within each group who say the following are a “major reason” for their use of social networking sites 100% 80% 71% 70% 57% 55% 60% 53% 45% 42% 40% 30% 20% 0% Staying in touch with current friends Connecting with old friends you've lost touch with 18-29 (n=274) 30-49 (n=348) 50-64 (n=262) 65+ (n=110) Source: The Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project, April 26 – May 22, 2011 Spring Tracking Survey; n=2,277 adults ages 18 and older, including 755 cell phone interviews. Interviews were conducted in English and Spanish. Margin of error is +/-3 percentage points for SNS users (n=1,015) http://pewinternet.org Page 3
  • 4. In addition to age, gender and parental status are linked with users’ attitudes towards social media as a way to maintain connections with friends. Women are slightly more likely than men to say that staying in touch with current friends is a major reason for using online social tools (70% vs. 63%) while parents are more likely than non-parents to say that connecting with old friends is a major reason behind their use of these sites (56% vs. 47%). Compared with keeping tabs on current friends or old acquaintances, users place much less emphasis on using social platforms to make entirely new friends—just 9% say this is a major reason they use these sites, and 57% say that it is not a reason at all for their online social networking activity. Groups that are more likely than average to use social media to make new friends include men (12% say that making new friends is a major reason for using these sites), African Americans (15%), those who have a high school diploma but have not attended college (16%) and those with an annual household income under $30,000 (18%). Middle-aged and older adults place a relatively high value on social media as a tool to connect with others around a hobby and interest Compared with maintaining or rekindling friendships, the ability to connect with others who share a hobby or interest using social media resonates with a slightly older cohort of users. Sixteen percent of 30-49 year olds and 18% of 50-64 year olds cite connecting with others with common hobbies or interests as a major reason they use social networking sites, compared with 10% of 18-29 year olds. Additionally, men are a bit more likely than women to use these sites to connect around a hobby or interest—56% of male users say that this is either a major or minor reason for their usage of these sites, compared with 44% of female users. Connecting with public figures online is relatively popular among Twitter users, as well as African Americans and Latinos Among social media users as a whole, the ability to read comments by public figures such as politicians, celebrities or athletes does not come into play as a major factor—fully three quarters of users say that this plays no role whatsoever in their decision to use these sites. And while connecting with public figures has a relatively modest impact on users across a range of groups, both African Americans and Latinos show more interest in this activity than white users. One in ten black social media users (10%) and 11% of Latinos say that reading comments from public figures is a major reason for using these sites (compared with just 3% of white users). Black and Latino social media users are also more likely to say that this is a minor factor (31% of blacks and 26% of Latinos say this, compared with 16% of whites). http://pewinternet.org Page 4
  • 5. Reading comments by celebrities, politicians or athletes Based on adults who use Twitter and/or social networking sites such as Facebook, MySpace or LinkedIn 100% 80% 59% 63% 60% 80% 40% 31% 26% 20% 16% 10% 11% 0% 3% White (n=695) Black (n=117) Latino (n=115) Major reason Minor reason Not a reason Source: The Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project, April 26 – May 22, 2011 Spring Tracking Survey; n=2,277 adults ages 18 and older, including 755 cell phone interviews. Interviews were conducted in English and Spanish. Margin of error is +/-3 percentage points for SNS users (n=1,015) Additionally, Twitter users are more interested in connecting with public figures than are social media users who do not use Twitter. One in ten Twitter users (11%) say that reading comments by politicians, celebrities or athletes is a major reason they use online social networks, and 30% say that this is a minor reason for their usage of these sites. Each of these is notably higher than the average for social media users who do not use Twitter (4% of these users say this is a major reason for using these sites, with 11% citing it as a minor reason). Finding potential dating partners is at most a minor element of the social media experience Very few social media users say that finding potential romantic partners or people to date plays a role in their use of these sites—overall more than eight in ten (84%) do not use these sites for that purpose at all. Most of the remainder say that the prospect of romance is only a minor reason. Most differences on this question are quite modest—for example, men are twice as likely as women to say that finding potential dating or romantic partners is a minor reason for using online social platforms (17% vs. 9%) but overall few men say that this is a major factor (just 4% do so). http://pewinternet.org Page 5
  • 6. To be sure, many Americans are currently in relationships or may not otherwise be seeking dating or romantic partners in any venue (on social networking sites or otherwise). Among those users who identify themselves as single, separated or divorced, 6% say that finding romantic or dating partners is a major reason why they use these sites (an additional 27% say that this is a minor reason for their social media usage). About this survey The results reported here are based on a national telephone survey of 2,277 adults conducted April 26- May 22, 2011. 1,522 interviews were conducted by landline phone, and 755 interviews were conducted by cell phone. Interviews were conducted in both English and Spanish. For results based on social networking site users, the margin of error is +/-3 percentage points (n=1,015). http://pewinternet.org Page 6
  • 7. Survey questions Spring Change Assessment Survey 2011 Final Topline 5/25/2011 Data for April 26–May 22, 2011 Princeton Survey Research Associates International for the Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project Sample: n= 2,277 national adults, age 18 and older, including 755 cell phone interviews Interviewing dates: 04.26.2011 – 05.22.2011 Margin of error is plus or minus 2 percentage points for results based on Total [n=2,277] Margin of error is plus or minus 3 percentage points for results based on internet users [n=1,701] Margin of error is plus or minus 3 percentage points for results based on cell phone users [n=1,914] Margin of error is plus or minus 3 percentage points for results based on SNS or Twitter users [n=1,015] SNS10 People use social networking sites for a number of reasons. Please tell me if each of the following is a MAJOR reason you use these sites, a MINOR reason, or not a reason at all for you. (First,/Next,) [INSERT; RANDOMIZE]. [READ FOR FIRST ITEM, THEN AS NECESSARY:] Is this a MAJOR reason you use social networking sites, a MINOR reason, or not a reason at all for you? Based on SNS or Twitter users [N=1,015] MAJOR MINOR NOT A DON’T REASON REASON REASON KNOW REFUSED a. Staying in touch with family members 64 23 13 * * b. Staying in touch with current friends 67 24 9 * * c. Connecting with old friends that you lost touch with 50 36 13 * * d. Making new friends 9 34 57 * * e. Connecting with other people who share your hobbies or interests 14 35 50 0 * f. Reading comments or posts by celebrities, politicians or athletes 5 20 74 * * g. Finding potential romantic partners or people you might like to date 3 13 84 * * http://pewinternet.org Page 7
  • 8. Methodology This report is based on the findings of a survey on Americans' use of the Internet. The results in this report are based on data from telephone interviews conducted by Princeton Survey Research Associates International from April 26 to May 22, 2011, among a sample of 2,277 adults, age 18 and older. Telephone interviews were conducted in English and Spanish by landline (1,522) and cell phone (755, including 346 without a landline phone). For results based on the total sample, one can say with 95% confidence that the error attributable to sampling is plus or minus 2.4 percentage points. For results based Internet users (n=1,701), the margin of sampling error is plus or minus 2.7 percentage points. In addition to sampling error, question wording and practical difficulties in conducting telephone surveys may introduce some error or bias into the findings of opinion polls. A combination of landline and cellular random digit dial (RDD) samples was used to represent all adults in the continental United States who have access to either a landline or cellular telephone. Both samples were provided by Survey Sampling International, LLC (SSI) according to PSRAI specifications. Numbers for the landline sample were selected with probabilities in proportion to their share of listed telephone households from active blocks (area code + exchange + two-digit block number) that contained three or more residential directory listings. The cellular sample was not list-assisted, but was drawn through a systematic sampling from dedicated wireless 100-blocks and shared service 100-blocks with no directory-listed landline numbers. New sample was released daily and was kept in the field for at least five days. The sample was released in replicates, which are representative subsamples of the larger population. This ensures that complete call procedures were followed for the entire sample. At least 7 attempts were made to complete an interview at a sampled telephone number. The calls were staggered over times of day and days of the week to maximize the chances of making contact with a potential respondent. Each number received at least one daytime call in an attempt to find someone available. For the landline sample, interviewers asked to speak with the youngest adult male or female currently at home based on a random rotation. If no male/female was available, interviewers asked to speak with the youngest adult of the other gender. For the cellular sample, interviews were conducted with the person who answered the phone. Interviewers verified that the person was an adult and in a safe place before administering the survey. Cellular sample respondents were offered a post-paid cash incentive for their participation. All interviews completed on any given day were considered to be the final sample for that day. Weighting is generally used in survey analysis to compensate for sample designs and patterns of non- response that might bias results. A two-stage weighting procedure was used to weight this dual-frame sample. The first-stage weight is the product of two adjustments made to the data – a Probability of Selection Adjustment (PSA) and a Phone Use Adjustment (PUA). The PSA corrects for the fact that respondents in the landline sample have different probabilities of being sampled depending on how many adults live in the household. The PUA corrects for the overlapping landline and cellular sample frames. http://pewinternet.org Page 8
  • 9. The second stage of weighting balances sample demographics to population parameters. The sample is balanced by form to match national population parameters for sex, age, education, race, Hispanic origin, region (U.S. Census definitions), population density, and telephone usage. The White, non-Hispanic subgroup is also balanced on age, education and region. The basic weighting parameters came from a special analysis of the Census Bureau’s 2010 Annual Social and Economic Supplement (ASEC) that included all households in the continental United States. The population density parameter was derived from Census 2000 data. The cell phone usage parameter came from an analysis of the January-June 2010 National Health Interview Survey. Following is the full disposition of all sampled telephone numbers: Table 2:Sample Disposition Landline Cell 32,909 19,899 Total Numbers Dialed 1,416 364 Non-residential 1,428 35 Computer/Fax 32 ---- Cell phone 16,833 8,660 Other not working 1,629 287 Additional projected not working 11,571 10,553 Working numbers 35.2% 53.0% Working Rate 543 96 No Answer / Busy 3,091 3,555 Voice Mail 53 10 Other Non-Contact 7,884 6,892 Contacted numbers 68.1% 65.3% Contact Rate 489 1,055 Callback 5,757 4,618 Refusal 1,638 1,219 Cooperating numbers 20.8% 17.7% Cooperation Rate 56 33 Language Barrier ---- 426 Child's cell phone 1,582 760 Eligible numbers 96.6% 62.3% Eligibility Rate 60 5 Break-off 1,522 755 Completes 96.2% 99.3% Completion Rate 13.6% 11.5% Response Rate http://pewinternet.org Page 9
  • 10. The disposition reports all of the sampled telephone numbers ever dialed from the original telephone number samples. The response rate estimates the fraction of all eligible respondents in the sample that were ultimately interviewed. At PSRAI it is calculated by taking the product of three component rates:  Contact rate – the proportion of working numbers where a request for interview was made  Cooperation rate – the proportion of contacted numbers where a consent for interview was at least initially obtained, versus those refused  Completion rate – the proportion of initially cooperating and eligible interviews that were completed Thus the response rate for the landline sample was 13.6 percent. The response rate for the cellular sample was 11.5 percent. http://pewinternet.org Page 10