1. PRELIMINARY EVALUATION SHEET
Quality of Summary My honest evaluation- what Strategies put forward to
was done well and what was make sure a high quality is
not of good standard? Try to maintained.
cite specific example and
moments from your video
Quality of holding a shot We used a tripod, which The tripod on the table was
steady held a steady shot. We not professional. A tripod with
balanced the tripod on the longer legs could have been
table at one point in order to used.
create a low shot camera
angle of the conversation
taking place.
Quality of the framing shots We filmed over the
character’s shoulders,
enabling the audience to
feel like they are watching
through the eyes of that
character
Quality of shooting material
appropriate to the task set-
i.e. the content of your film
pre and post editing was
consistent with the exam
directives
Quality of selecting mise-en- We were able to get a table We should distinguish who
scène including colour, figure, situated in the middle of the the characters are, where
lighting, objects and setting; room. However, we did not they are, and age in order to
pay specific attention to supply costume and
costume, lighting and color. significant mise en scene.
A piece of paper signified Lighting should’ve been
the will acknowledged. Perhaps a
dim light could have been
used to enhance bad news
Quality of editing so that
meaning is apparent to the
viewer
Quality of using sound with
images and editing
appropriately for the task set;
Quality of positioning and
movements of actors
Quality of group planning,
meeting targets, organization

2. Group dynamics i.e. how did
your group work together
Other points of evaluation
( e.g. equipment related etc)