SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 19
GPS Data Collection Setting
 For Pedestrian Activity Modelling

Adel Bolbol Fernández
Tao Cheng
Department of Civil, Environmental & Geomatic Engineering
UCL
Outline
• Background
   – Research Area
   – Positioning Sensor Devices
   – Scenario
• Why
   – Epoch Rate Detection?
   – Pedestrians?
• Test
   –   Data
   –   Method
   –   Limitations
• Observations
   –   Positional Error
   –   Route Length Error
   –   Average Speed Error
   –   Start & End Error
• Conclusions


   Background                Why?   Test   Analysis   Conclusions
Background: Research Area
            Location Information                Activity Recognition
               “Sensor Data”                   •Diaries/logs
            GPS
            GSM   Wi-Fi    RFID                •Algorithms



Inferring
                            Trip        Trip Start     Transport
            Trip Route
                           Purpose       & End           Mode




                                  Modelling
                  •Spatio-Temporal Human Activity
                  •Travel Behaviour



 Background               Why?        Test           Analysis      Conclusions
Background: Positioning Sensor Devices
                             Travel Data

     Wi-Fi, GSM                                             GPS
      & RFID


   Indoor           Wide            High             Long Life
                                                                  Small Size
  Coverage        Coverage        Accuracy            Battery

                                               Non-
                       Logged Data
                        Real Time          Interactivity
Desirable Properties                        Interactive




  Background           Why?           Test            Analysis    Conclusions
Why Pedestrians?


     1. Almost every journey starts and ends in the
        “Pedestrian” Mode (Walking)

     2. Unlike vehicles, No Traffic Routing rules are
        followed




 Background      Why?       Test      Analysis    Conclusions
Why Find Best Epoch Rate?
                                                       “Epoch Rate”
      The frequency at which GPS
         measurements are taken                       “Data Collection
                                                           Rate”
        (e.g. every 30 seconds)
                                                       “Capture Rate”

 Is the more data the better?

 When is data too much?
 & Where is the threshold?

 Practicability of battery requirements?




                                    Best epoch rate for a realistic,
                                      accurate, battery efficient
                                  representation of human behaviour


 Background            Why?          Test        Analysis      Conclusions
Scenario
1. Route Detection                                                      Walk
                                                                    5
2. Detection of MoT
3. Start & End Locations           2                         Work
                             Bus
4. Trip Purpose
            GPS
           points




                     User                     GPS
                                                    Walk 3
                             Home – Work
     Home
   Walk                         Trip                           4
                                                             Tube
    1

   Background         Why?             Test     Analysis        Conclusions
Why Find Best Epoch Rate Detection? 10S
1. For Route Detection




   Epoch rate =
   10 Seconds




   Background            Why?   Test   Analysis   Conclusions
Why Find Best Epoch Rate Detection? 20S
1. For Route Detection




   Epoch rate =
   20
   10 Seconds




   Background            Why?   Test   Analysis   Conclusions
Why Find Best Epoch Rate Detection? 60S
1. For Route Detection




   Epoch rate =
   60
   20 Seconds




   Background            Why?   Test   Analysis   Conclusions
Why Find Best Epoch Rate Detection? 4
1. For Route Detection
2. For Mode Detection
3. For Detecting Start-End                        Work


   Epoch rate =
   60 Seconds



                  Walk


                                          Bus

      Home



   Background            Why?   Test   Analysis     Conclusions
Test: Data

    • 7-8 minute walking journey

    • Data was collected every 1 second

    • Data was thinned to the following epoch rates:
      (1, 10, 20, 30, 60, 120 and 300 seconds)

    • 11 datasets were collected for the exact same
      journey




 Background      Why?      Test      Analysis   Conclusions
Test: Method

1. Route taken                     1. Positional Errors
      (Map matching)
2. Distance Travelled              2. Route Length Errors

3. Trajectory Speed                3. Average Speed Errors

4. Identifying Trip Start          4. Distances from First
   & End                              & last points to Trips’
                                      Start & End




 Background       Why?      Test        Analysis    Conclusions
Analysis: 1. Positional Errors

                                                                     From Averages of All Thinned Data Groups


                                 From Thinned Data Group 1                                                                                         From Thinned Data Group 2
                                                            50
                                     Positional Error (m)




                                                            40
                         Bearing in mind;
                          100                                   100
  Positional Error (m)




                                                                                                         Positional Error (m)
                         •Road links in London (278,691 links): 80
                           80
                                     30

                         •Average Length of Road links = 80 m 60 SD = 98.47
                           60
                                     20
                         •Average Speed of Pedestrians = 1.2 m/s40
                           40                                              Average
                          20                                                                                                    20
                                                                                                                                                                = 15 m
                                                            10

                         Therefore;
                            0                                            0

                                        0
                         •To select the correct Road Link  We need1 at least 2 points 120 each
                          -20
                              1  10   20  30 60     120  300
                                                                       -20
                                                                             10 20 30  60
                                                                                                on 300
                         •Most AppropriateMin Outlier Max Rate = Approx. 66s
                                      -10    Epoch Outlier                            Min Outlier Max Outlier
                                                                 1        10       20          30                         60             120           300
                                                                                                                                                     Epoch Rate (s)
                                     Epoch Rate (s)
                                                                                        Epoch Rate (s)
                                                                                                                                     Min Outlier      Max Outlier




                                                                      Results from 11 Datasets

 Background                                                          Why?                      Test                                                Analysis                Conclusions
Analysis: 2. Route Length Errors

                                  1100
                                  4200

                                  1000

                                   900
         Total Route Length (m)




                                   800
                                                                                                           Actual Route
                                   700                                                                       Length =
                                   600
                                                                                                              667m
                                   500

                                   400

                                   300

                                   200

                                   100

                                     0
                                         1   10     20           30       60      120         300

                                                         Epoch Rate (s)
                                                                               Min Outlier   Max Outlier




 Background                                  Why?                     Test                   Analysis       Conclusions
Analysis: 3. Average Speed Errors

                                    2.5


                                    2.3


                                    2.0


                                    1.8
        Average Route Speed (m/s)




                                    1.5
                                                                                                          Actual Average
                                    1.3
                                                                                                             Speed =
                                    1.0                                                                   Approx. 1.2 m/s
                                    0.8


                                    0.5


                                    0.3


                                    0.0
                                          1   10   20          30        60      120          300

                                                        Epoch Rate (s)
                                                                              Min Outlier   Max Outlier




 Background                                   Why?                   Test                   Analysis        Conclusions
Analysis: 4. Distances from last points to Trips
Starts & Ends
                                                                                 250



                                                                                 200




                                             Distance from End Destination (m)
                                                                                 150



                                                                                 100



                                                                                  50



                                                                                  0
                                                                                         1   10     20       30       60         120      300
                                                                                                  Epoch Rate (s)
  •Pedestrians Average Speed = 1.2 m/s                                                                             Min Outlier   Max Outlier

  •Worst Case:
  10s = 12m
  20s = 24m
  30s = 36m
                    + Positional Errors
  60s = 72m                                                                            •Do we require the exact location?
  120s = 144m                                                                          •If not ---- Land Use/Mix data
  300s = 360m



 Background                Why?           Test                                                Analysis                       Conclusions
Conclusions

  1. Positional Accuracy = Approx. 15-20m

  2. Length Calculation: 20 sec was most accurate

  3. Speed Calculation: 30 & 60 sec

  4. Start & End: 10 & 20 sec – 1 sec good accuracy &
     high uncertainty

  5. Around 20 or 30 sec is most appropriate for
     pedestrian route modelling

 Background      Why?      Test       Analysis   Conclusions
Thank You
& what are your questions?



a.bolbol@ucl.ac.uk

Más contenido relacionado

Similar a 7A_4_Gps data collection setting for pedestrian activity modelling

Study of Tactile interactions for visually disabled and hearing impaired
Study of  Tactile interactions for visually disabled and hearing impaired Study of  Tactile interactions for visually disabled and hearing impaired
Study of Tactile interactions for visually disabled and hearing impaired Abu Saleh Musa
 
Hand Gesture Recognition for an Off-the-Shelf Radar by Electromagnetic Modeli...
Hand Gesture Recognition for an Off-the-Shelf Radar by Electromagnetic Modeli...Hand Gesture Recognition for an Off-the-Shelf Radar by Electromagnetic Modeli...
Hand Gesture Recognition for an Off-the-Shelf Radar by Electromagnetic Modeli...Arthur Sluÿters
 
IAP09 CUDA@MIT 6.963 - Lecture 01: High-Throughput Scientific Computing (Hans...
IAP09 CUDA@MIT 6.963 - Lecture 01: High-Throughput Scientific Computing (Hans...IAP09 CUDA@MIT 6.963 - Lecture 01: High-Throughput Scientific Computing (Hans...
IAP09 CUDA@MIT 6.963 - Lecture 01: High-Throughput Scientific Computing (Hans...npinto
 
Bringing iot data to life, IoT Israel 2014
Bringing iot data to life, IoT Israel 2014Bringing iot data to life, IoT Israel 2014
Bringing iot data to life, IoT Israel 2014iotisrael
 
K t-route-privacy - kan qi
K t-route-privacy - kan qiK t-route-privacy - kan qi
K t-route-privacy - kan qiKan Qi
 
Amaya_Presentation
Amaya_PresentationAmaya_Presentation
Amaya_PresentationIsaias Amaya
 
Adaptive Hyper-Parameter Tuning for Black-box LiDAR Odometry [IROS2021]
Adaptive Hyper-Parameter Tuning for Black-box LiDAR Odometry [IROS2021]Adaptive Hyper-Parameter Tuning for Black-box LiDAR Odometry [IROS2021]
Adaptive Hyper-Parameter Tuning for Black-box LiDAR Odometry [IROS2021]KenjiKoide1
 
Link line crossing speed estimation with narrowband signal strength
Link line crossing speed estimation with narrowband signal strengthLink line crossing speed estimation with narrowband signal strength
Link line crossing speed estimation with narrowband signal strengthAlemayehu Solomon
 
Multi Sensor Data Fusion In Target Tracking
Multi Sensor Data Fusion In Target TrackingMulti Sensor Data Fusion In Target Tracking
Multi Sensor Data Fusion In Target TrackingVasuhiSamydurai1
 
Study of Tactile interactions for visually disabled and hearing impaired
Study of Tactile interactions for visually disabled and hearing impaired Study of Tactile interactions for visually disabled and hearing impaired
Study of Tactile interactions for visually disabled and hearing impaired Taslima Projucti
 
Citron : Context Information Acquisition Framework on Personal Devices
Citron : Context Information Acquisition Framework on Personal DevicesCitron : Context Information Acquisition Framework on Personal Devices
Citron : Context Information Acquisition Framework on Personal DevicesTetsuo Yamabe
 
Smartphone-based Pedestrian Dead Reckoning as an Indoor Positioning System
Smartphone-based Pedestrian Dead Reckoning as an Indoor Positioning SystemSmartphone-based Pedestrian Dead Reckoning as an Indoor Positioning System
Smartphone-based Pedestrian Dead Reckoning as an Indoor Positioning SystemAlwin Poulose
 
HPLC APPLICATION RECENT DEVELOPMENT STATIONARY PHASE MATERIAL Dr suman presen...
HPLC APPLICATION RECENT DEVELOPMENT STATIONARY PHASE MATERIAL Dr suman presen...HPLC APPLICATION RECENT DEVELOPMENT STATIONARY PHASE MATERIAL Dr suman presen...
HPLC APPLICATION RECENT DEVELOPMENT STATIONARY PHASE MATERIAL Dr suman presen...Dr. Suman Pattanayak
 
Evaluating Data Freshness in Large Scale Replicated Databases
Evaluating Data Freshness in Large Scale Replicated DatabasesEvaluating Data Freshness in Large Scale Replicated Databases
Evaluating Data Freshness in Large Scale Replicated DatabasesMiguel Araújo
 
Indoor Radio Positioning Systems
Indoor Radio Positioning SystemsIndoor Radio Positioning Systems
Indoor Radio Positioning SystemsIEEEP Karachi
 
Présentation noura baccar " Innovation on Indoor GeoLocalization Applications...
Présentation noura baccar " Innovation on Indoor GeoLocalization Applications...Présentation noura baccar " Innovation on Indoor GeoLocalization Applications...
Présentation noura baccar " Innovation on Indoor GeoLocalization Applications...Cynapsys It Hotspot
 

Similar a 7A_4_Gps data collection setting for pedestrian activity modelling (20)

Session 55 Oded Cats
Session 55 Oded CatsSession 55 Oded Cats
Session 55 Oded Cats
 
Study of Tactile interactions for visually disabled and hearing impaired
Study of  Tactile interactions for visually disabled and hearing impaired Study of  Tactile interactions for visually disabled and hearing impaired
Study of Tactile interactions for visually disabled and hearing impaired
 
Hand Gesture Recognition for an Off-the-Shelf Radar by Electromagnetic Modeli...
Hand Gesture Recognition for an Off-the-Shelf Radar by Electromagnetic Modeli...Hand Gesture Recognition for an Off-the-Shelf Radar by Electromagnetic Modeli...
Hand Gesture Recognition for an Off-the-Shelf Radar by Electromagnetic Modeli...
 
IAP09 CUDA@MIT 6.963 - Lecture 01: High-Throughput Scientific Computing (Hans...
IAP09 CUDA@MIT 6.963 - Lecture 01: High-Throughput Scientific Computing (Hans...IAP09 CUDA@MIT 6.963 - Lecture 01: High-Throughput Scientific Computing (Hans...
IAP09 CUDA@MIT 6.963 - Lecture 01: High-Throughput Scientific Computing (Hans...
 
Bringing iot data to life, IoT Israel 2014
Bringing iot data to life, IoT Israel 2014Bringing iot data to life, IoT Israel 2014
Bringing iot data to life, IoT Israel 2014
 
K t-route-privacy - kan qi
K t-route-privacy - kan qiK t-route-privacy - kan qi
K t-route-privacy - kan qi
 
Amaya_Presentation
Amaya_PresentationAmaya_Presentation
Amaya_Presentation
 
Adaptive Hyper-Parameter Tuning for Black-box LiDAR Odometry [IROS2021]
Adaptive Hyper-Parameter Tuning for Black-box LiDAR Odometry [IROS2021]Adaptive Hyper-Parameter Tuning for Black-box LiDAR Odometry [IROS2021]
Adaptive Hyper-Parameter Tuning for Black-box LiDAR Odometry [IROS2021]
 
Link line crossing speed estimation with narrowband signal strength
Link line crossing speed estimation with narrowband signal strengthLink line crossing speed estimation with narrowband signal strength
Link line crossing speed estimation with narrowband signal strength
 
Multi Sensor Data Fusion In Target Tracking
Multi Sensor Data Fusion In Target TrackingMulti Sensor Data Fusion In Target Tracking
Multi Sensor Data Fusion In Target Tracking
 
Study of Tactile interactions for visually disabled and hearing impaired
Study of Tactile interactions for visually disabled and hearing impaired Study of Tactile interactions for visually disabled and hearing impaired
Study of Tactile interactions for visually disabled and hearing impaired
 
project final ppt.pptx
project final ppt.pptxproject final ppt.pptx
project final ppt.pptx
 
Citron : Context Information Acquisition Framework on Personal Devices
Citron : Context Information Acquisition Framework on Personal DevicesCitron : Context Information Acquisition Framework on Personal Devices
Citron : Context Information Acquisition Framework on Personal Devices
 
Smartphone-based Pedestrian Dead Reckoning as an Indoor Positioning System
Smartphone-based Pedestrian Dead Reckoning as an Indoor Positioning SystemSmartphone-based Pedestrian Dead Reckoning as an Indoor Positioning System
Smartphone-based Pedestrian Dead Reckoning as an Indoor Positioning System
 
HPLC APPLICATION RECENT DEVELOPMENT STATIONARY PHASE MATERIAL Dr suman presen...
HPLC APPLICATION RECENT DEVELOPMENT STATIONARY PHASE MATERIAL Dr suman presen...HPLC APPLICATION RECENT DEVELOPMENT STATIONARY PHASE MATERIAL Dr suman presen...
HPLC APPLICATION RECENT DEVELOPMENT STATIONARY PHASE MATERIAL Dr suman presen...
 
Lecture 06: Features and Uncertainty
Lecture 06: Features and UncertaintyLecture 06: Features and Uncertainty
Lecture 06: Features and Uncertainty
 
Modern Surveying Equipment Presentation
Modern Surveying Equipment PresentationModern Surveying Equipment Presentation
Modern Surveying Equipment Presentation
 
Evaluating Data Freshness in Large Scale Replicated Databases
Evaluating Data Freshness in Large Scale Replicated DatabasesEvaluating Data Freshness in Large Scale Replicated Databases
Evaluating Data Freshness in Large Scale Replicated Databases
 
Indoor Radio Positioning Systems
Indoor Radio Positioning SystemsIndoor Radio Positioning Systems
Indoor Radio Positioning Systems
 
Présentation noura baccar " Innovation on Indoor GeoLocalization Applications...
Présentation noura baccar " Innovation on Indoor GeoLocalization Applications...Présentation noura baccar " Innovation on Indoor GeoLocalization Applications...
Présentation noura baccar " Innovation on Indoor GeoLocalization Applications...
 

Más de GISRUK conference

7B_3_Matterhorn on the horizon
7B_3_Matterhorn on the horizon7B_3_Matterhorn on the horizon
7B_3_Matterhorn on the horizonGISRUK conference
 
7B_2_Topological consistent generalization of openstreetmap
7B_2_Topological consistent generalization of openstreetmap7B_2_Topological consistent generalization of openstreetmap
7B_2_Topological consistent generalization of openstreetmapGISRUK conference
 
5A_3_GIS based spatial modelling for improving the sustainability of aggregat...
5A_3_GIS based spatial modelling for improving the sustainability of aggregat...5A_3_GIS based spatial modelling for improving the sustainability of aggregat...
5A_3_GIS based spatial modelling for improving the sustainability of aggregat...GISRUK conference
 
5A_1_Land evaluation techniques comparing fuzzy ahp with ideal point methods
5A_1_Land evaluation techniques comparing fuzzy ahp with ideal point methods5A_1_Land evaluation techniques comparing fuzzy ahp with ideal point methods
5A_1_Land evaluation techniques comparing fuzzy ahp with ideal point methodsGISRUK conference
 
4B_3_Automatically generating keywods for georeferenced imaged
4B_3_Automatically generating keywods for georeferenced imaged4B_3_Automatically generating keywods for georeferenced imaged
4B_3_Automatically generating keywods for georeferenced imagedGISRUK conference
 
4B_1_How many volunteers does it take to map an area well
4B_1_How many volunteers does it take to map an area well4B_1_How many volunteers does it take to map an area well
4B_1_How many volunteers does it take to map an area wellGISRUK conference
 
4A_1_Uncertainty in the 2001 output area classification for the census of eng...
4A_1_Uncertainty in the 2001 output area classification for the census of eng...4A_1_Uncertainty in the 2001 output area classification for the census of eng...
4A_1_Uncertainty in the 2001 output area classification for the census of eng...GISRUK conference
 
3A_4_Applying network analysis to quantify accessibility to urban greenspace ...
3A_4_Applying network analysis to quantify accessibility to urban greenspace ...3A_4_Applying network analysis to quantify accessibility to urban greenspace ...
3A_4_Applying network analysis to quantify accessibility to urban greenspace ...GISRUK conference
 
3A_2_Modelling health-harming behaviours in a socially ranked geographic space
3A_2_Modelling health-harming behaviours in a socially ranked geographic space3A_2_Modelling health-harming behaviours in a socially ranked geographic space
3A_2_Modelling health-harming behaviours in a socially ranked geographic spaceGISRUK conference
 
1A_3_A geodemographic classification of london primary schools
1A_3_A geodemographic classification of london primary schools1A_3_A geodemographic classification of london primary schools
1A_3_A geodemographic classification of london primary schoolsGISRUK conference
 
UK Map Challenge Aidan Slingsby
UK Map Challenge   Aidan SlingsbyUK Map Challenge   Aidan Slingsby
UK Map Challenge Aidan SlingsbyGISRUK conference
 
SP_4 Supporting spatial negotiations in land use planning
SP_4 Supporting spatial negotiations in land use planningSP_4 Supporting spatial negotiations in land use planning
SP_4 Supporting spatial negotiations in land use planningGISRUK conference
 
SP_3 Automatic identification of high streets and classification of urban lan...
SP_3 Automatic identification of high streets and classification of urban lan...SP_3 Automatic identification of high streets and classification of urban lan...
SP_3 Automatic identification of high streets and classification of urban lan...GISRUK conference
 
9B_1_Trust in web gis a preliminary investigation of the environment agencys ...
9B_1_Trust in web gis a preliminary investigation of the environment agencys ...9B_1_Trust in web gis a preliminary investigation of the environment agencys ...
9B_1_Trust in web gis a preliminary investigation of the environment agencys ...GISRUK conference
 
9A_2_Automatic classification of retail spaces from a large scale topographc ...
9A_2_Automatic classification of retail spaces from a large scale topographc ...9A_2_Automatic classification of retail spaces from a large scale topographc ...
9A_2_Automatic classification of retail spaces from a large scale topographc ...GISRUK conference
 
9A_1_On automatic mapping of environmental data using adaptive general regres...
9A_1_On automatic mapping of environmental data using adaptive general regres...9A_1_On automatic mapping of environmental data using adaptive general regres...
9A_1_On automatic mapping of environmental data using adaptive general regres...GISRUK conference
 
8B_4_Exploring the usability of geographic information
8B_4_Exploring the usability of geographic information8B_4_Exploring the usability of geographic information
8B_4_Exploring the usability of geographic informationGISRUK conference
 
8B_2_Using sound to represent uncertainty in address locations
8B_2_Using sound to represent uncertainty in address locations8B_2_Using sound to represent uncertainty in address locations
8B_2_Using sound to represent uncertainty in address locationsGISRUK conference
 
8B_1_A map to hear - use of sound in enhancing the map use experience
8B_1_A map to hear - use of sound in enhancing the map use experience8B_1_A map to hear - use of sound in enhancing the map use experience
8B_1_A map to hear - use of sound in enhancing the map use experienceGISRUK conference
 
8A_2_A containment-first search algorithm for higher-order analysis of urban ...
8A_2_A containment-first search algorithm for higher-order analysis of urban ...8A_2_A containment-first search algorithm for higher-order analysis of urban ...
8A_2_A containment-first search algorithm for higher-order analysis of urban ...GISRUK conference
 

Más de GISRUK conference (20)

7B_3_Matterhorn on the horizon
7B_3_Matterhorn on the horizon7B_3_Matterhorn on the horizon
7B_3_Matterhorn on the horizon
 
7B_2_Topological consistent generalization of openstreetmap
7B_2_Topological consistent generalization of openstreetmap7B_2_Topological consistent generalization of openstreetmap
7B_2_Topological consistent generalization of openstreetmap
 
5A_3_GIS based spatial modelling for improving the sustainability of aggregat...
5A_3_GIS based spatial modelling for improving the sustainability of aggregat...5A_3_GIS based spatial modelling for improving the sustainability of aggregat...
5A_3_GIS based spatial modelling for improving the sustainability of aggregat...
 
5A_1_Land evaluation techniques comparing fuzzy ahp with ideal point methods
5A_1_Land evaluation techniques comparing fuzzy ahp with ideal point methods5A_1_Land evaluation techniques comparing fuzzy ahp with ideal point methods
5A_1_Land evaluation techniques comparing fuzzy ahp with ideal point methods
 
4B_3_Automatically generating keywods for georeferenced imaged
4B_3_Automatically generating keywods for georeferenced imaged4B_3_Automatically generating keywods for georeferenced imaged
4B_3_Automatically generating keywods for georeferenced imaged
 
4B_1_How many volunteers does it take to map an area well
4B_1_How many volunteers does it take to map an area well4B_1_How many volunteers does it take to map an area well
4B_1_How many volunteers does it take to map an area well
 
4A_1_Uncertainty in the 2001 output area classification for the census of eng...
4A_1_Uncertainty in the 2001 output area classification for the census of eng...4A_1_Uncertainty in the 2001 output area classification for the census of eng...
4A_1_Uncertainty in the 2001 output area classification for the census of eng...
 
3A_4_Applying network analysis to quantify accessibility to urban greenspace ...
3A_4_Applying network analysis to quantify accessibility to urban greenspace ...3A_4_Applying network analysis to quantify accessibility to urban greenspace ...
3A_4_Applying network analysis to quantify accessibility to urban greenspace ...
 
3A_2_Modelling health-harming behaviours in a socially ranked geographic space
3A_2_Modelling health-harming behaviours in a socially ranked geographic space3A_2_Modelling health-harming behaviours in a socially ranked geographic space
3A_2_Modelling health-harming behaviours in a socially ranked geographic space
 
1A_3_A geodemographic classification of london primary schools
1A_3_A geodemographic classification of london primary schools1A_3_A geodemographic classification of london primary schools
1A_3_A geodemographic classification of london primary schools
 
UK Map Challenge Aidan Slingsby
UK Map Challenge   Aidan SlingsbyUK Map Challenge   Aidan Slingsby
UK Map Challenge Aidan Slingsby
 
SP_4 Supporting spatial negotiations in land use planning
SP_4 Supporting spatial negotiations in land use planningSP_4 Supporting spatial negotiations in land use planning
SP_4 Supporting spatial negotiations in land use planning
 
SP_3 Automatic identification of high streets and classification of urban lan...
SP_3 Automatic identification of high streets and classification of urban lan...SP_3 Automatic identification of high streets and classification of urban lan...
SP_3 Automatic identification of high streets and classification of urban lan...
 
9B_1_Trust in web gis a preliminary investigation of the environment agencys ...
9B_1_Trust in web gis a preliminary investigation of the environment agencys ...9B_1_Trust in web gis a preliminary investigation of the environment agencys ...
9B_1_Trust in web gis a preliminary investigation of the environment agencys ...
 
9A_2_Automatic classification of retail spaces from a large scale topographc ...
9A_2_Automatic classification of retail spaces from a large scale topographc ...9A_2_Automatic classification of retail spaces from a large scale topographc ...
9A_2_Automatic classification of retail spaces from a large scale topographc ...
 
9A_1_On automatic mapping of environmental data using adaptive general regres...
9A_1_On automatic mapping of environmental data using adaptive general regres...9A_1_On automatic mapping of environmental data using adaptive general regres...
9A_1_On automatic mapping of environmental data using adaptive general regres...
 
8B_4_Exploring the usability of geographic information
8B_4_Exploring the usability of geographic information8B_4_Exploring the usability of geographic information
8B_4_Exploring the usability of geographic information
 
8B_2_Using sound to represent uncertainty in address locations
8B_2_Using sound to represent uncertainty in address locations8B_2_Using sound to represent uncertainty in address locations
8B_2_Using sound to represent uncertainty in address locations
 
8B_1_A map to hear - use of sound in enhancing the map use experience
8B_1_A map to hear - use of sound in enhancing the map use experience8B_1_A map to hear - use of sound in enhancing the map use experience
8B_1_A map to hear - use of sound in enhancing the map use experience
 
8A_2_A containment-first search algorithm for higher-order analysis of urban ...
8A_2_A containment-first search algorithm for higher-order analysis of urban ...8A_2_A containment-first search algorithm for higher-order analysis of urban ...
8A_2_A containment-first search algorithm for higher-order analysis of urban ...
 

7A_4_Gps data collection setting for pedestrian activity modelling

  • 1. GPS Data Collection Setting For Pedestrian Activity Modelling Adel Bolbol Fernández Tao Cheng Department of Civil, Environmental & Geomatic Engineering UCL
  • 2. Outline • Background – Research Area – Positioning Sensor Devices – Scenario • Why – Epoch Rate Detection? – Pedestrians? • Test – Data – Method – Limitations • Observations – Positional Error – Route Length Error – Average Speed Error – Start & End Error • Conclusions Background Why? Test Analysis Conclusions
  • 3. Background: Research Area Location Information Activity Recognition “Sensor Data” •Diaries/logs GPS GSM Wi-Fi RFID •Algorithms Inferring Trip Trip Start Transport Trip Route Purpose & End Mode Modelling •Spatio-Temporal Human Activity •Travel Behaviour Background Why? Test Analysis Conclusions
  • 4. Background: Positioning Sensor Devices Travel Data Wi-Fi, GSM GPS & RFID Indoor Wide High Long Life Small Size Coverage Coverage Accuracy Battery Non- Logged Data Real Time Interactivity Desirable Properties Interactive Background Why? Test Analysis Conclusions
  • 5. Why Pedestrians? 1. Almost every journey starts and ends in the “Pedestrian” Mode (Walking) 2. Unlike vehicles, No Traffic Routing rules are followed Background Why? Test Analysis Conclusions
  • 6. Why Find Best Epoch Rate? “Epoch Rate” The frequency at which GPS measurements are taken “Data Collection Rate” (e.g. every 30 seconds) “Capture Rate” Is the more data the better? When is data too much? & Where is the threshold? Practicability of battery requirements? Best epoch rate for a realistic, accurate, battery efficient representation of human behaviour Background Why? Test Analysis Conclusions
  • 7. Scenario 1. Route Detection Walk 5 2. Detection of MoT 3. Start & End Locations 2 Work Bus 4. Trip Purpose GPS points User GPS Walk 3 Home – Work Home Walk Trip 4 Tube 1 Background Why? Test Analysis Conclusions
  • 8. Why Find Best Epoch Rate Detection? 10S 1. For Route Detection Epoch rate = 10 Seconds Background Why? Test Analysis Conclusions
  • 9. Why Find Best Epoch Rate Detection? 20S 1. For Route Detection Epoch rate = 20 10 Seconds Background Why? Test Analysis Conclusions
  • 10. Why Find Best Epoch Rate Detection? 60S 1. For Route Detection Epoch rate = 60 20 Seconds Background Why? Test Analysis Conclusions
  • 11. Why Find Best Epoch Rate Detection? 4 1. For Route Detection 2. For Mode Detection 3. For Detecting Start-End Work Epoch rate = 60 Seconds Walk Bus Home Background Why? Test Analysis Conclusions
  • 12. Test: Data • 7-8 minute walking journey • Data was collected every 1 second • Data was thinned to the following epoch rates: (1, 10, 20, 30, 60, 120 and 300 seconds) • 11 datasets were collected for the exact same journey Background Why? Test Analysis Conclusions
  • 13. Test: Method 1. Route taken 1. Positional Errors (Map matching) 2. Distance Travelled 2. Route Length Errors 3. Trajectory Speed 3. Average Speed Errors 4. Identifying Trip Start 4. Distances from First & End & last points to Trips’ Start & End Background Why? Test Analysis Conclusions
  • 14. Analysis: 1. Positional Errors From Averages of All Thinned Data Groups From Thinned Data Group 1 From Thinned Data Group 2 50 Positional Error (m) 40 Bearing in mind; 100 100 Positional Error (m) Positional Error (m) •Road links in London (278,691 links): 80 80 30 •Average Length of Road links = 80 m 60 SD = 98.47 60 20 •Average Speed of Pedestrians = 1.2 m/s40 40 Average 20 20 = 15 m 10 Therefore; 0 0 0 •To select the correct Road Link  We need1 at least 2 points 120 each -20 1 10 20 30 60 120 300 -20 10 20 30 60 on 300 •Most AppropriateMin Outlier Max Rate = Approx. 66s -10 Epoch Outlier Min Outlier Max Outlier 1 10 20 30 60 120 300 Epoch Rate (s) Epoch Rate (s) Epoch Rate (s) Min Outlier Max Outlier Results from 11 Datasets Background Why? Test Analysis Conclusions
  • 15. Analysis: 2. Route Length Errors 1100 4200 1000 900 Total Route Length (m) 800 Actual Route 700 Length = 600 667m 500 400 300 200 100 0 1 10 20 30 60 120 300 Epoch Rate (s) Min Outlier Max Outlier Background Why? Test Analysis Conclusions
  • 16. Analysis: 3. Average Speed Errors 2.5 2.3 2.0 1.8 Average Route Speed (m/s) 1.5 Actual Average 1.3 Speed = 1.0 Approx. 1.2 m/s 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.0 1 10 20 30 60 120 300 Epoch Rate (s) Min Outlier Max Outlier Background Why? Test Analysis Conclusions
  • 17. Analysis: 4. Distances from last points to Trips Starts & Ends 250 200 Distance from End Destination (m) 150 100 50 0 1 10 20 30 60 120 300 Epoch Rate (s) •Pedestrians Average Speed = 1.2 m/s Min Outlier Max Outlier •Worst Case: 10s = 12m 20s = 24m 30s = 36m + Positional Errors 60s = 72m •Do we require the exact location? 120s = 144m •If not ---- Land Use/Mix data 300s = 360m Background Why? Test Analysis Conclusions
  • 18. Conclusions 1. Positional Accuracy = Approx. 15-20m 2. Length Calculation: 20 sec was most accurate 3. Speed Calculation: 30 & 60 sec 4. Start & End: 10 & 20 sec – 1 sec good accuracy & high uncertainty 5. Around 20 or 30 sec is most appropriate for pedestrian route modelling Background Why? Test Analysis Conclusions
  • 19. Thank You & what are your questions? a.bolbol@ucl.ac.uk