Cash Payment 9602870969 Escort Service in Udaipur Call Girls
CCS - liquid logistics shipping concept - Anthony Veder Vopak
1. Preliminary results
GCCSI Study
Liquid logistic Shipping Concept
Lessons learned to date
Rotterdam
May 11th, 2011
Michael Tetteroo & Cees van der Ben
5/13/2011 1
2. Preliminary results
CINTRA logistic concept
• Bulk making/breaking for off shore CO2 storage
• Intermediate Storage
• Combine and link pipeline systems and barging/shipping routes: 4 routes
• Provide independent custody transfer metering (for ETS)
• Network building block (at rivers and coast lines)
5/13/2011 2
3. Preliminary results
Hub service: CO2 transfer barge/ship pipe
BARGE/SHIP
PIPE
5/13/2011 3
4. Preliminary results
CO2 Transport and Storage systems
• Transport from the Emitters via
pipelines or barges; Liquefaction at the Emitter’s site
• Collecting CO2 in storage tanks at the or at the CO2 Hub
CO2 Hub;
• Loading sea vessels for transport to
depleted offshore gas fields.
Connecting Hub
to offshore trunk line
• Locking the sea vessel to a floating turret or
loading tower linked with the sub-sea system of the
depleted gas field;
• Injecting the CO2 into the porous rocks (depleted
gas or oil field or aquifers, at required temp’s and
pressures ;
• As an alternative, mooring near a platform for
discharging the CO2 into a depleted field via the
platform utilities
5/13/2011 • Ship is designed to carry both CO2 and LPG 4
5. Preliminary results
Hub Concept Organic Growth Model:
Asset build up follows the volume build-up
Source 1 Source 2 Source 3 Source 4 Source n
3
1
2 2
1. Early scheme: single source
flow too small to justify off shore
3. Final mature scheme:
pipe
multiple sources &
2. Intermediate scheme: two sinks, both depleted
combined flows do allow for an reservoirs and EOR at
off shore pipe => ship moves production wells
into alternative CO2 or LPG 3
service 2
3
1
2
Potentially
Ship now could ship that
become pipe used to sail
line for 2 on sink 1 Sink 3: EOR
Sink 1 Sink 1 Sink 2 Sink n
5/13/2011 sources at oil field
5
6. Preliminary results
GCCSI LLSC study:
lessons learned to date
General
• Start engineering at the sink
• Minimize CO2 composition requirements
• Combining multiple emitters in one network is technically feasible.
• No metallurgical/corrosion issues found other than water: dry at the
source
SHE
• No items of concern encountered
• Low vessel collision risk due to high LCO2 density
• On shore pipeline through busy areas: 40 bar
Compression
• Up to 100 bar: bull gear compressor (bull gear), beyond: pump.
• Moderate ambient temperatures: no power consumption difference
between compression or compression/liquefaction/pumping.
Pipeline
• In dense phase in order to minimize costs.
5/13/2011 6
7. Preliminary results
GCCSI LLSC study:
lessons learned to date
Liquefaction
• Optimum CO2 liquefaction condition: -50 ˚C, 7 bara.
• Combining parallel compression and liquefaction in one
machine feasible.
Storage
• Terminal minimum storage volume: 10,000 m3
• Min. costs/m3: > 2000 m3 shop fabricated spheres
• Other considerations may call for horizontal bullets.
Legislation
Biggest remaining uncertainties:
• CO2 custody transfer: who, when and to whom
• Monitoring requirements in the mean time
5/13/2011 7
9. Preliminary results
LLSC mission statement
• Depleted gas field NS
• Stand alone operation
• Stay above hydrate formation bottom hole temperature: 13 ˚C
• Challenges: all solvable
Intermittent flow
Pressure over sink life time: 150 – 400 bar at well head
450
400
Ship manifold pressure (bara)
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Time line (years)
5/13/2011 9
10. Preliminary results
Shipping
Source: AnthonyVeder – IP Anthony Veder
• LPG/CO2 carrier
• 30,000 m3
• Stand alone operation
• Onboard conditioning
• Key challenge: uptime
• Conventional
• X - bow
Source Anthony Veder, X-Bow® IP of Ulstein Sea of Solutions
5/13/2011 10
11. Preliminary results
Conventional hull
Source: AnthonyVeder – IP Anthony Veder
LOA 210 m DP 2
B 33.6 m Sailing speed 17kts (lpg trade)
5/13/2011 T 11 m Gradual power generation build 11
12. Preliminary results
CO2Conditioning
Source: AnthonyVeder – IP Anthony Veder
5/13/2011 12
13. Preliminary results
Rotterdam distance to sinks
Dutch sinks are all
within the 400 km
range.
5/13/2011 13
14. Preliminary results
GCCSI LLSC study:
lessons learned to date
Barging/shipping
• No CO2 venting/re-liquefaction in transit
• Barge max. LOA 135 m → 150 m in the future
• Max barge size Ruhrgebiet → R’dam: 7500 tonnes (Ruhrgebiet →
Karlsruhe: 6000 tonnes)
• Required ship sizes: 10,000 - 30,000 m3
• Ship min. required off loading temperature: 0 ˚C
• => sea water suffices as heat source for LCO2 “vaporization”
Ship off loading
• HP pressure CO2 unmanned off loading: technically feasible at
acceptable uptimes in deep and shallow water.
• Depleted reservoir’s existing wells require retubing
• Ship → sink batch injection technically feasible, multiple wells likely
to be required flow wise.
• Tubing: low temperature material of construction.
5/13/2011 14
15. Preliminary results
GCCSI LLSC study:
lessons learned to date
Costs: contract duration
Pipeline system tariffs are hurt the most by short term contracts
5/13/2011 15
16. Preliminary results
Transportation Costs: insight evolution
LNG CO2
Source: IEA GHG, 2004
CO2 CO2
5/13/2011 16
17. Preliminary results
GCCSI LLSC study:
lessons learned to date
Costs
• CO2 transportation is to be considered as a regular infra
structural project: 20+ year contract durations
• CO2 liquefaction’s energy intensity is relatively low =>
cost break even distances are
1. for on shore pipe versus barge: 200 km (and not 1500 km)
2. for off shore pipe versus ship: 150 km (and not 750 km)
• Depending on flow and distance the transportation costs
may vary from 20 to 120 €/ton (20 year contract)
• Combining multiple emitters in one system is paramount
to make CCS affordable, especially for industrial
(smaller) emitters
5/13/2011 17