2. Critical Political Economy
“Traditionally, this type of analysis focuses
on how economic inequalities based upon
ownership and control serve to narrow the
range of media content available in market-
based societies.”
Source: Chadwick, p. 290.
3. Three Schools of Thought
Strong political economy approach
Media should be seen as directly servicing a wider
system of material production (e.g. Theodor Adorno
-- consumer capitalism)
Weak political economy approach
Greater role for individual leadership in the media
industries (e.g. Benjamin Bagdikian)
Instrumental approach
How owners and political elites use the media as
instruments of ideological mobilization (e.g.
Noam Chomsky)
4. Decline of Newspapers?
Readership is down relative to other media use.
Last year was the worst on record for the U.S.
newspaper industry advertising. Total advertising
revenues (both print and online) declined to $25.84
billion in 2010, according to the latest figures from the
Newspaper Association of America. That is down from
$48 billion in 2004.
On-line newspaper advertising was up to $3 billion in
2010 from $1.2 billion in 2003 but that clearly does not
make up from the decline in other areas.
Newspaper Death Watch
13. Closing of Newspapers
At least 120 newspapers in the U.S. have
shut down since January 2008,
according to Paper Cuts, a Web site
tracking the newspaper industry. More
than 21,000 jobs at 67 newspapers have
vaporized in that time, according to the
site.
Source: http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/03/19/newspaper.decline.layoff/index.html
14. Origins of the Net Neutrality Debate
Coalition of Broadband Users and
Innovators (CBUI) sent a letter to FCC
Chairman Michael Powell in November
2002
It included the phrase “net neutrality”
coined by Tim Wu in an article written in
2002 and published in 2003
CBUI called for “nondiscrimination
safeguards” to guarantee net neutrality
15. What is Net Neutrality?
“Net neutrality simply means that all like Internet
content must be treated alike and move at the
same speed over the network. The owners of
the Internet’s wires cannot discriminate. This is
the simple but brilliant “end-to-end” design of
the Internet that has made it such a powerful
force for economic and social good.”
Lawrence Lessig and Robert W. McChesney, “No Tolls on the Internet,”
Washington Post, June 8, 2006.
Ask a Ninja’s “What is Net Neutrality?” video
16. Eli Noam’s Possible Meanings
No different quality grades for service
No price discrimination among Internet providers
No monopoly price charged to content and
application providers
No discrimination against content providers who
compete with carrier’s own content
No selectivity by the carriers over the content that
they transmit
No blocking of the access of users to some
websites
17. Arguments of Proponents
End-to-end architecture of the Internet
must be preserved
This means preventing discrimination by
conduit companies against content and
services that they do not control
Conduit companies will reserve lots of
bandwidth for services like cable TV
which will degrade Internet performance
for everyone else
Vint Cerf
18. Congress and the FCC Encourage
Telephone and Cable to Compete
Telecom Act of 1996
FCC decisions to permit telephone
companies to buy cable networks and cable
operators to compete in telephone markets
FCC wanted telcos and cable companies to
compete in high-speed Internet and cable TV
services via new fiber optic networks built
without government subsidies
19. Top ISPs in the USA (2011)
Comcast
Time Warner
Cable operators
AT&T
Cox
Optimum
Charter Telephone companies
Verizon
Source: http://isp-review.toptenreviews.com/
20. Top Global Web Sites (2011)
Google
Facebook
YouTube
Yahoo!
Wikipedia
Baidu
Blogspot
Twitter
21. Michael Powell’s Internet
Freedoms, 2004
freedom to access content
freedom to use applications
freedom to attach personal devices
freedom to obtain service plan
information
22. FCC Policy Statement 2005
consumers are entitled to access the lawful
Internet content of their choice
consumers are entitled to run applications and
services of their choice, subject to the needs of
law enforcement
consumers are entitled to connect their choice of
legal devices that do not harm the network
consumers are entitled to competition among
network providers, application and service
providers, and content providers
23. More Arguments of
Proponents
There is insufficient competition between
cable operators and telcos to guarantee
non-discrimination
There is a potential for violations of
freedom of speech in the absence of net
neutrality guarantees
Gigi Sohn Larry Tim
Lessig Berners-Lee
24. Organizations that Support Net
Neutrality
ACLU
ALA
Christian Coalition
Gun Owners of America
Consumers Union
Google, Amazon, Yahoo!
American Electronics Association
25. The Opponents’ Perspective on
Net Neutrality
NCTA anti-NN ad
Fox News coverage
Glenn Beck
David Farber
26. Arguments of Opponents
Net neutrality guarantees constitute
unnecessary regulation
The threat of discrimination is overblown
Cable and telephone companies need
new revenues to build out the network
Need to have “intelligent networks” to
obtain “quality of service”
Competition is sufficient to prevent
abuses
27. The Video Franchise Bill, 2006
Attempts by Democrats led by Ed
Markey in the House to add net neutrality
amendments failed in committee and on
the floor
Net neutrality amendment proposed by
Senator Olympia Snowe (R-ME) failed to
pass in an 11-11 committee vote
Senator Ted Stevens (R-AK) voted
against the amendment
28. Ted Stevens’ Tubes Statement
And again, the Internet is not something you just dump
something on. It's not a big truck. It's a series of tubes.
And if you don't understand those tubes can be filled and
if they are filled, when you put your message in, it gets in
line and it's going to be delayed by anyone that puts into
that tube enormous amounts of material, enormous
amounts of material.
June 28, 2006
Video by Y490 class memb
30. Telecom Lobbying Money Spent in
the First Half of 2006
Category Specific Firms and Amount in $
Organization millions
Telephone AT&T, Verizon, BellSouth, 30.3
Interests and USTA
Cable Interests Comcast, Time Warner, Cox, 12.2
and NCTA
Internet Google, Yahoo!, eBay, 8.8
Interests Microsoft, Amazon.com
Total 51.3
31. Wyden Saves the Day
Ron Wyden used his Senatorial privilege to
place a hold on the Video Franchise bill
because of the lack of net neutrality
guarantees. Since Ted Stevens did not have
the 60 votes needed to override Wyden’s hold,
the bill was not put up for a vote on the Senate
floor.
32. Barack Obama Supports Net
Neutrality
Speech on net neutrality at Google in 2007
Net neutrality becomes part of the official
Democratic party platform in 2008
Obama appoints Julius Genachowski as head
of the FCC in 2009
American Recovery and Investment Act of
2009 provides $7.2 billion for broadband
infrastructure and mandates that the FCC
prepare a National Broadband Plan
33. Genachowski Adds Two Items to
FCC Policy Statement of 2005
“broadband providers cannot discriminate
against particular Internet content or
applications”
• “providers of broadband Internet access
must be transparent about their network
management processes.”
Video of Genachowski
34. Comcast Throttling of Bit-
Torrent Traffic in 2007
Robb Topolski discovers delays in delivery of
Bit-Torrent files for his barber shop quartet
Topolski publishes this on TorrentFreak blog
EFF and AP verify independently
Comcast eventually admits that it was “traffic
shaping” using an application called Sandvine
that prevents “seeding”
The FCC told Comcast to stop doing this
Comcast complied but appealed to courts
35. The Comcast Ruling
US Circuit Court of Appeals of DC ruled
on April 6, 2010, that the FCC did not
have the authority to regulate ISPs under
the Telecom Act of 1996 (therefore
Comcast was not bound to obey FCC
rules regarding traffic management)
Ruling was based on FCC decision to
reclassify cable modems and DSL as
information services
36. The National Broadband Plan
FCC announced intention to guarantee
net neutrality in spite of Comcast ruling
Genachowski spoke of a “third way”
between “heavy-handed prescriptive
regulation” and the “light-touch approach”
of the past
FCC would attempt to reclassify
transmission component of broadband as
a “telecommunication service”
37. Conclusions
Net neutrality was framed by Republicans as a
regulatory issue.
Republicans and their supporters carried the day until
June 2006 when the political tide began turn against
them.
The 2006 and 2008 election results meant that
Democrats and their allies would attempt to pass
legislation guaranteeing net neutrality.
However, the Comcast ruling and strong Republican
opposition to net neutrality made legislative action very
unlikely. It was not clear whether the FCC strategy to
reclassify broadband transmission would work.