Acoustic tags can provide information about fish populations beyond just presence/absence. If detections are uniformly spaced with high precision, fish behaviors like moving towards and away from objects, holding positions, defecating, downstream migration, fish passage, searching, and predator avoidance can be assessed. Examples showed tagged fish exhibiting these behaviors as detected by multiple precisely positioned hydrophones.
1. Acoustic tagging studies – beyond
presence/absence
Kevin Kumagai, Sam Johnston, and Colleen Sullivan
Hydroacoustic Technology, Inc.
47th Annual Conference of the California-Nevada Chapter AFS
April 4th - April 6th, 2013
Davis Veterans Memorial Center
2. Overview
• Acoustic tags can provide information about fish
populations. For example, presence/absence.
• If detections are uniformly spaced to a high level of
precision, these detections can assess fish behavior.
• Example behaviors include:
• Moving towards and away
• Holding
• Defecation
• Downstream migration
• Fish passage
• Searching
• Predator avoidance
3. Acoustic tags = information
• Acoustic tags can provide information about fish
populations. For example, presence/absence.
6. Fish survival and fish passage
• Can measured from the these detection histories
7. Uniform spacing, high precision: fish
behavior
• Acoustic tags can provide information about fish
populations.
• If detections are uniformly spaced to a high level of
precision, these detections can assess fish behavior.
Tag ID encoded in unique period
(adapted from Ehrenberg and Steig, 2009)
16. Single hydrophone example behaviors
• Acoustic tags can provide information about fish
populations.
• If detections are uniformly spaced to a high level of
precision, these detections can assess fish behavior.
• Behaviors in this example include:
• Moving toward and away
• Holding
• Defecation
20. Single hydrophone example behaviors
• Acoustic tags can provide information about fish
populations.
• If detections are uniformly spaced to a high level of
precision, these detections can assess fish behavior.
• Behaviors in this example include:
• Moving toward and away
• Holding
• Defecation
22. Defecation
• Acoustic tags can provide information about fish
populations.
• If detections are uniformly spaced to a high level of
precision, these detections can assess fish behavior.
• Behaviors in this example include:
• Moving toward and away
• Holding
• Defecation
32. 2D tracks example behaviors
• Acoustic tags can provide information about fish
populations.
• If detections are uniformly spaced to a high level of
precision, these detections can assess fish behavior.
• Behaviors in this example include:
• Holding
• Downstream migration
• Searching
• Fish passage
• Predator avoidance
35. Holding, 23:04-23:05
Tagged striped bass continues holding. Steelhead tag (light green
spheres) approaching array below pink and green hydrophones. Data
courtesy of CDWR.
45. Predator avoidance, 23:14-23:15
As steelhead tag passes over striped bass, steelhead tag appears to
avoid bass moving counter-clockiwse. Striped bass also moves
downstream. Data courtesy of CDWR.
54. 2010 Animation
Eonfusion screen capture showing concurrent tag tracks, hydrophone
positions, tidal, velocity, flow, flap gate operation, sun and moon phase
within a geo-referenced image of the ORT area. Data courtesy of CDWR.
55. 2011 Animation
Eonfusion screen capture showing concurrent tag tracks, hydrophone
positions, river stage height, sun and moon phase within a geo-
referenced image of the ORT area. Data courtesy of CDWR.
56. Summary
• Acoustic tags can provide information about fish
populations. For example, presence/absence.
• If detections are uniformly spaced to a high level of
precision, these detections can assess fish behavior.
• Example behaviors include:
• Moving towards and away
• Holding
• Defecation
• Downstream migration
• Fish passage
• Searching
• Predator avoidance
57. References
• Ehrenberg, J. E., and Steig, T. W. 2009. A study of the relationship between
tag-signal characteristics and achievable performances in acoustic fish-tag
studies. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 66: 1278–1283.
• Kumagai, K.K., S.V. Johnston, C. Sullivan, and P.A. Nealson. 2010. Two-
dimensional fish tracking study in the Old River at Tracy barrier in 2010.
Report to California Department of Water Resources, Sacramento, Calif., by
Hydroacoustic Technology, Inc., Seattle, Wash.
• Tunnicliffe, C., K.K. Kumagai, and S.V. Johnston. 2011. Two-dimensional
fish tracking study in the Old River at Tracy barrier in 2011. Report to
California Department of Water Resources, Sacramento, Calif., by
Hydroacoustic Technology, Inc., Seattle, Wash.
59. Questions?
Kevin Kumagai, Sam Johnston, and Colleen Sullivan
Hydroacoustic Technology, Inc.
For more information: www.htisonar.com
Notas del editor
Timing of the start of each transmission is precisely controlled by a microcontroller within each tag.
Upstream side of barrier. Either moving toward and away from hydrophone.
Behavior can be further interpreted when tag detection histories are observed and analyzed in relation to each other and not as isolated tag detections. In this presentation, we document the behaviors of acoustically tagged fish and discuss the implications for fish survival estimates in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta.
Hyperlink to ORT2011_HTI_AcousticTags.avi using Camtasia Player 2009 version